This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.1505 2461248.6505 11.32 17:34:03.10 -08:09:16.1
16.48221 13.13096 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.51 Nemausa 2 -0 2 11.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 17:34:03.10 -08:09:16.1: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 17:34:03.10 -08:09:16.1: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.6505,11.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.1505 11.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.1505 2461248.6505 11.75 17:36:32.43 -07:07:56.5
17.70781 13.11307 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.216 Kleopatra 0 -0 1 11.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 17:36:32.43 -07:07:56.5: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 17:36:32.43 -07:07:56.5: 16.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.6505,11.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.1505 11.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.1505 2461248.6505 12.68 17:06:25.22 -14:43:01.3
7.03228 15.36316 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J170625-1443.0
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.610 V Y 0.860 V 2452226.30000 64.272858000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 17:06:25.22 -14:43:01.3: 13.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 17:06:25.22 -14:43:01.3: 13.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J170625-1443.0,2461248.6505,12.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J170625-1443.0 20260727.1505 12.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.80846674 14.05.2026 07:24:01.526 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
First image: 2461174.80846674 14.05.2026 07:24:01.526 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
Last image: 2461248.65169240 27.07.2026 03:38:16.223 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 12
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.99
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 16535
Objects passed selection criteria: 16457
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10271.2
Average stars matched: 9924.25 (96.6216 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 241804 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 26 22:40:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.80846674 14.05.2026 07:24:01.526 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
First image: 2461174.80846674 14.05.2026 07:24:01.526 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
Last image: 2461248.65169240 27.07.2026 03:38:16.223 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 91
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.72
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 26 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 111440
Objects passed selection criteria: 111126
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 75400.5
Average stars matched: 71842.2 (95.2809 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1994816 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 26 22:46:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461248.64937619
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits'
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:35.304 -09:59:32.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.529 -10:00:05.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:35.304 -09:59:32.47
Second-epoch image center 17:08:34.529 -10:00:05.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0096 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:31.754 -09:59:39.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:35.304 -09:59:32.47
Second-epoch image center 17:08:31.754 -09:59:39.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0147 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:34.529 -10:00:05.24
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:31.754 -09:59:39.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01342 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oERCUwhfUX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uNJqITMGNS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EZwhkbbQot
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KHLIqHPeAs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 17479 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0950 to 265.2527 deg, Dec -15.2593 to -4.6816 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0950 to 265.2527 deg, Dec -15.2593 to -4.6816 deg
Loaded 4110 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3306 out of 3603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3603 out of 17479 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.714450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.714450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.99
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 17479 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0950 to 265.2527 deg, Dec -15.2593 to -4.6816 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0950 to 265.2527 deg, Dec -15.2593 to -4.6816 deg
Loaded 4110 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3306 out of 3603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3603 out of 17479 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits (aperture=6.7)
Read 17696 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0965 to 265.2599 deg, Dec -15.2508 to -4.6669 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0965 to 265.2599 deg, Dec -15.2508 to -4.6669 deg
Loaded 4111 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3320 out of 3598 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3598 out of 17696 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits (aperture=6.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
2.6 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
3.5 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
2.6 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
2.6 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
2.6 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
15.7 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.oERCUwhfUX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits 856.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1185, bad_region=0, passed=17479
Got 17479 stars (including 16279 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17479 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17294 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17294 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.762 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.533 n_q1=175 n_q2=343 n_q3=216 n_q4=200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.295
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uNJqITMGNS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits 856.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1219, bad_region=0, passed=17696
Got 17696 stars (including 16466 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17696 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17464 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17464 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.607 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.810 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.571 n_q1=173 n_q2=344 n_q3=217 n_q4=197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.334
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EZwhkbbQot (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=183, bad_region=0, passed=3148
Got 3148 stars (including 2963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3148 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=930 robust_rms=12.711 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=930 robust_rms=0.482 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=930 robust_rms_before=1.019 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.476 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.482 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.476 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.655 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.682 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.345 n_q1=179 n_q2=342 n_q3=233 n_q4=176 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.512
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KHLIqHPeAs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=235, bad_region=0, passed=3063
Got 3063 stars (including 2823 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3063 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2994 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2995 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2995 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=936 robust_rms=12.893 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=936 robust_rms=0.478 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=936 robust_rms_before=0.915 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.368 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.478 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.368 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=186 n_q2=349 n_q3=229 n_q4=172 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.305
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits sigma_overall=0.588 worst_q_ratio=1.295
ref2=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits sigma_overall=0.607 worst_q_ratio=1.334
new1=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits sigma_overall=0.451 worst_q_ratio=1.512
new2=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.305
reference average sigma_overall=0.5975 worst_q_ratio=1.3145
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5_astrometric_residuals.png (934 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.55 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5_astrometric_residuals.png (931 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.56 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002_astrometric_residuals.png (930 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003_astrometric_residuals.png (936 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 17:34:03.10 -08:09:16.1: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 17:34:03.10 -08:09:16.1: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21364.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21199_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 21199_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:27.10 -06:23:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21215_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 21215_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:43.09 -15:07:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21225_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 21225_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:04.74 -11:28:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21258_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 21258_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:45.89 -08:33:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21295_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 21295_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:17.77 -06:14:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21304_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 21304_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:21.56 -05:49:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21364_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 21364_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07051_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 07051_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:56.94 -12:12:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10692_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 10692_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:05.15 -09:57:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02492_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 02492_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:41.81 -14:14:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16207_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 16207_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:06.81 -04:55:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
17:34:03.10 -08:09:16.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:35.304 -09:59:32.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.529 -10:00:05.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:35.304 -09:59:32.47
Second-epoch image center 17:08:34.529 -10:00:05.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0096 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:31.754 -09:59:39.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:35.304 -09:59:32.47
Second-epoch image center 17:08:31.754 -09:59:39.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0147 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:34.529 -10:00:05.24
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:31.754 -09:59:39.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01342 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits &> /tmp/tmp.38GAbFogYb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RqA8MYkZmc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3OOYpICKzb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3d0zsGcIZH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 123842 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0898 to 265.2529 deg, Dec -15.2593 to -4.6766 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0898 to 265.2529 deg, Dec -15.2593 to -4.6766 deg
Loaded 4115 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2758 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 123842 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.565750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.565750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.72
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.85
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.85
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 123842 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0898 to 265.2529 deg, Dec -15.2593 to -4.6766 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0898 to 265.2529 deg, Dec -15.2593 to -4.6766 deg
Loaded 4115 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2758 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 123842 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits (aperture=5.2)
Read 124082 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0938 to 265.2608 deg, Dec -15.2510 to -4.6669 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0938 to 265.2608 deg, Dec -15.2510 to -4.6669 deg
Loaded 4114 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2757 out of 3602 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3602 out of 124082 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 87 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
2.5 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
3.0 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
15.8 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.38GAbFogYb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits 856.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=13671, bad_region=2, passed=123817
Got 123817 stars (including 110001 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 123817 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 122927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 122926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 122927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.607 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.711 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.625 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.613 n_q1=199 n_q2=321 n_q3=210 n_q4=208 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RqA8MYkZmc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits 856.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=13365, bad_region=4, passed=124070
Got 124070 stars (including 110575 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 124070 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 122732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 122728 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 122729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.726 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.663 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.647 n_q1=193 n_q2=335 n_q3=204 n_q4=206 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3OOYpICKzb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=878, bad_region=2, passed=24849
Got 24849 stars (including 23935 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24849 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.617 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.634 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.347 n_q1=166 n_q2=322 n_q3=250 n_q4=196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.444
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3d0zsGcIZH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=914, bad_region=1, passed=31677
Got 31677 stars (including 30712 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31677 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=180 n_q2=340 n_q3=235 n_q4=182 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.221
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223851_TTUQ1b1x1_152346_0eQgegJa/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 17:19:24.77 -10:00:33.6: 13.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 17:06:51.44 -05:54:20.9: 13.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 16:56:15.72 -09:49:02.6: 13.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 16:52:38.70 -08:33:58.4: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 17:19:01.65 -14:36:25.9: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 17:07:41.13 -08:02:56.7: 13.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 17:19:24.77 -10:00:33.6: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:24.77 -10:00:33.6: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3545 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 16:52:38.70 -08:33:58.4: 12.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 17:06:51.44 -05:54:20.9: 13.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 17:07:41.13 -08:02:56.7: 13.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:38.70 -08:33:58.4: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9589 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:51.44 -05:54:20.9: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.5915 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:07:41.13 -08:02:56.7: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4289 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 16:56:15.72 -09:49:02.6: 13.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 17:19:01.65 -14:36:25.9: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:56:15.72 -09:49:02.6: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1772 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:01.65 -14:36:25.9: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6139 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 17:36:32.43 -07:07:56.5: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 17:06:08.14 -10:28:31.5: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 17:36:32.43 -07:07:56.5: 16.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 16:40:53.53 -08:17:11.0: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 16:54:29.85 -05:55:35.9: 12.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 17:25:53.63 -14:58:36.0: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 17:06:08.14 -10:28:31.5: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:08.14 -10:28:31.5: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4454 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 16:40:53.53 -08:17:11.0: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 16:54:29.85 -05:55:35.9: 12.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:53.53 -08:17:11.0: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9176 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:54:29.85 -05:55:35.9: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8620 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 17:34:50.16 -12:14:50.4: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 17:25:53.63 -14:58:36.0: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:53.63 -14:58:36.0: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5299 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 17:02:58.63 -06:22:17.2: 12.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 17:34:50.16 -12:14:50.4: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:34:50.16 -12:14:50.4: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8027 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 16:55:09.58 -08:21:03.7: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 17:02:58.63 -06:22:17.2: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:58.63 -06:22:17.2: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1074 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 16:50:28.46 -07:26:28.8: 13.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 16:55:09.58 -08:21:03.7: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:09.58 -08:21:03.7: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2493 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 16:50:28.46 -07:26:28.8: 13.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:28.46 -07:26:28.8: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4137 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 16:57:11.07 -08:22:50.3: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 16:59:34.03 -07:35:40.8: 13.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 16:54:38.35 -05:42:34.0: 13.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 16:54:16.49 -06:41:11.0: 13.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 17:13:32.24 -10:10:51.3: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 16:57:11.07 -08:22:50.3: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:11.07 -08:22:50.3: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3991 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 17:21:39.76 -11:02:15.7: 13.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 16:59:34.03 -07:35:40.8: 13.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:59:34.03 -07:35:40.8: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4725 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 17:11:24.89 -09:56:23.8: 13.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 16:54:38.35 -05:42:34.0: 13.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:54:38.35 -05:42:34.0: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7669 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 16:54:16.49 -06:41:11.0: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 17:13:32.24 -10:10:51.3: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:54:16.49 -06:41:11.0: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6749 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:13:32.24 -10:10:51.3: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3402 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 17:21:39.76 -11:02:15.7: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:39.76 -11:02:15.7: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6990 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 17:11:24.89 -09:56:23.8: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:24.89 -09:56:23.8: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9915 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080_stack5.fits at 17:06:25.22 -14:43:01.3: 13.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-25-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0082_stack5.fits at 17:06:25.22 -14:43:01.3: 13.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:06:25.22 -14:43:01.3: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6864 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07382.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out146591.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146362_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146362_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146364_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146364_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146371_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146371_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146372_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146372_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146377_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146377_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146378_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146378_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:02.58 -11:36:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146384_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146384_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146385_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146385_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146387_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146387_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:14.98 -06:15:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146389_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146389_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:43.51 -14:55:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146391_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146391_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:46.52 -05:56:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146393_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146393_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:27.10 -06:23:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146411_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146411_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:43.07 -15:07:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146536_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146536_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:03.10 -08:09:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146552_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146552_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:13.76 -15:05:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146591_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 146591_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146641_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146641_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:37.94 -08:02:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146758_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146758_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:12.73 -14:40:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146805_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146805_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:46.60 -11:48:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146809_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146809_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146880_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146880_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:30.68 -12:31:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146890_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146890_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:56.91 -14:10:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146940_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146940_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146946_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146946_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146953_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146953_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:26.93 -08:19:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146964_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146964_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146974_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146974_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:45.58 -14:46:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146994_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146994_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:53.05 -05:54:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146995_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146995_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:21.12 -08:49:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146998_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146998_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:12.91 -13:41:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147014_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147014_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:56.48 -06:07:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147035_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147035_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147036_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147036_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:44.07 -06:07:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147093_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147093_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:15.52 -10:25:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147107_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147107_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147118_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147118_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:54.52 -09:41:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147136_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147136_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:19.87 -10:18:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147139_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147139_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:22.19 -04:54:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147153_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147153_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147171_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147171_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:24.65 -10:55:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147179_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147179_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:05.57 -08:52:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147196_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147196_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147242_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147242_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:09.62 -12:29:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147290_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147290_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:03.75 -07:33:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147299_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147299_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:27.56 -14:43:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147311_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147311_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:59.72 -12:10:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147332_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147332_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:28.00 -07:58:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147343_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147343_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:19.44 -14:36:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147347_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147347_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:58.50 -09:46:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147394_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147394_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:52.59 -08:58:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147410_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147410_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147424_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147424_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147432_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147432_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:57.36 -13:28:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147453_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147453_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147455_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147455_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:23.49 -08:12:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147465_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147465_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147523_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147523_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147580_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147580_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147589_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147589_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:20.45 -08:07:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147591_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 147591_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13181_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 13181_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:07.61 -14:16:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58138_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 58138_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:44.27 -11:12:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07382_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 07382_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37494_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 37494_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:20.08 -12:40:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15577_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 15577_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:41.04 -14:05:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16748_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 16748_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:37.59 -14:03:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85685_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 85685_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:06.82 -04:55:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115226_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 115226_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:23.20 -07:56:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79191_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 79191_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:05.25 -09:23:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108549_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 108549_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:45.87 -08:33:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21590_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 21590_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:52.75 -13:41:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91715_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 91715_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:58.67 -08:50:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99050_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 99050_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:21.53 -05:49:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72741_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 72741_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:05.15 -09:57:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12827_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 12827_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:41.80 -14:14:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08656_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 08656_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:45.70 -14:35:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72594_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 72594_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:32.67 -10:00:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15245_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 15245_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:51.07 -14:09:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54958_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 54958_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:04.75 -11:28:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07060_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 07060_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:41.94 -14:41:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82104_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 82104_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:57.43 -09:06:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26026_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 26026_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:00.05 -13:26:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08271_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 08271_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:03.84 -14:39:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43402_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 43402_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:56.94 -12:12:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102360_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 102360_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:17.78 -06:14:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98254_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 98254_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:04.00 -06:13:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104111_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 104111_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_22-38-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks