This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4499* 05 11 51.80 +22 59 31.9 6.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9499,6.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4499 6.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.4499 2461247.9499 9.09 05:30:28.17 +21:38:31.7
184.36258 -6.77943 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1 Ceres -3 2 3 9.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:30:28.17 +21:38:31.7: 14.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:30:28.17 +21:38:31.7: 14.33 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4499* 05 30 28.17 +21 38 31.7 9.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9499,9.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4499 9.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4499* 05 11 51.80 +22 59 31.5 7.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9499,7.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4499 7.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.4499 2461247.9499 11.26 05:30:46.30 +22:39:44.3
183.53767 -6.16802 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe -1 -0 1 11.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:30:46.30 +22:39:44.3: 16.80 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:30:46.30 +22:39:44.3: 16.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.80 +/- 0.32
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4499* 05 30 46.30 +22 39 44.3 11.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9499,11.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4499 11.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.4499 2461247.9499 11.91 05:14:32.67 +22:38:45.5
181.45263 -9.29016 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope -0 -0 0 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:14:32.67 +22:38:45.5: 16.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:14:32.67 +22:38:45.5: 16.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4499* 05 14 32.67 +22 38 45.5 11.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9499,11.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4499 11.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.4499 2461247.9499 12.03 05:41:09.69 +24:42:13.9
183.08342 -3.06638 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania 1 -1 1 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:41:09.69 +24:42:13.9: 16.72 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:41:09.69 +24:42:13.9: 16.82 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.76 +/- 0.23
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4499* 05 41 09.69 +24 42 13.9 12.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9499,12.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4499 12.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4499* 05 11 14.87 +23 03 08.4 12.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461247.9499,12.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260726.4499 12.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.4499 2461247.9499 12.99 05:29:30.68 +20:51:57.3
184.89846 -7.38734 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.5 pix
The object was found in VSX24" ASASSN-V J052928.97+205157.4
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.900 V 14.270 V
The object was found in astcheck.712 Boliviana 0 -1 1 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:29:30.68 +20:51:57.3: 15.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:29:30.68 +20:51:57.3: 15.28 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4499* 05 29 30.68 +20 51 57.3 13.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J052928.97+205157.4,2461247.9499,12.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J052928.97+205157.4 20260726.4499 12.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
First image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
Last image: 2461247.95027353 26.07.2026 10:48:13.633 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.92
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 21872
Objects passed selection criteria: 21761
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 18135.2
Average stars matched: 14750.8 (81.3375 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 257608 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 26 08:26:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
First image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
Last image: 2461247.95027353 26.07.2026 10:48:13.633 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 141
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.61
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 518 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 123991
Objects passed selection criteria: 123578
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 99933
Average stars matched: 83288.5 (83.3443 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2113368 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 26 08:43:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461247.94959138
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits'
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Image size: 938.8'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:31.434 +22:03:11.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87
Second-epoch image center 05:32:31.434 +22:03:11.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0660 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
Image size: 938.8'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:34.285 +22:02:40.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87
Second-epoch image center 05:32:34.285 +22:02:40.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0690 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:31.434 +22:03:11.35
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:34.285 +22:02:40.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01398 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pdL5GVY3SP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xAvpximKU5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kYzHjvWvC8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DatqTkyGzS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 47923 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1673 to 91.6837 deg, Dec +16.3329 to +27.3626 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1673 to 91.6837 deg, Dec 16.3329 to 27.3626 deg
Loaded 12332 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8546 out of 10425 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10425 out of 47923 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.967950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.967950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.92
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.05
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.05
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 47923 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1673 to 91.6837 deg, Dec +16.3329 to +27.3626 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1673 to 91.6837 deg, Dec 16.3329 to 27.3626 deg
Loaded 12332 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8546 out of 10425 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10425 out of 47923 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits (aperture=6.8)
Read 40714 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3529 to 91.9466 deg, Dec +16.4869 to +27.3012 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3529 to 91.9466 deg, Dec 16.4869 to 27.3012 deg
Loaded 12401 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8554 out of 10411 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10411 out of 40714 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
2.4 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
2.6 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
16.0 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
15.9 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 10.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pdL5GVY3SP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=6443, bad_region=15170, passed=47923
Got 47923 stars (including 28674 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47923 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34532 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34532 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34532 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.835 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=258 n_q2=216 n_q3=209 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.690
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xAvpximKU5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=5535, bad_region=5787, passed=40714
Got 40714 stars (including 29943 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40714 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34731 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34731 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.498 n_q1=362 n_q2=80 n_q3=350 n_q4=140 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.329
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kYzHjvWvC8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=252, bad_region=968, passed=3644
Got 3644 stars (including 2469 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3644 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 925 stars left (next iteration limit 1018)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=925 robust_rms=6.938 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=925 robust_rms=0.540 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=925 robust_rms_before=0.959 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.549 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.540 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.549 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits N_match=925 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.557 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.490 n_q1=250 n_q2=213 n_q3=218 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DatqTkyGzS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=241, bad_region=945, passed=3548
Got 3548 stars (including 2404 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3548 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2693 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2694 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2694 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1018)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=926 robust_rms=6.687 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=926 robust_rms=0.534 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=926 robust_rms_before=0.928 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.564 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.534 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.564 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits N_match=926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.610 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.477 n_q1=247 n_q2=217 n_q3=216 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits sigma_overall=0.494 worst_q_ratio=1.690
ref2=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.329
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits sigma_overall=0.561 worst_q_ratio=1.149
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits sigma_overall=0.546 worst_q_ratio=1.117
reference average sigma_overall=0.4345 worst_q_ratio=1.5095
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4_astrometric_residuals.png (931 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3_astrometric_residuals.png (932 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267_astrometric_residuals.png (925 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.53 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268_astrometric_residuals.png (926 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:30:28.17 +21:38:31.7: 14.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:30:28.17 +21:38:31.7: 14.33 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:30:28.17 +21:38:31.7: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=9.0868 delta=5.27 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out63534.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63530_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 63530_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:38.46 +23:38:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63531_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
Preparing report for the candidate 63531_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63534_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
Preparing report for the candidate 63534_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05585_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 05585_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.40 +17:54:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:30:28.17 +21:38:31.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Image size: 938.8'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:31.434 +22:03:11.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87
Second-epoch image center 05:32:31.434 +22:03:11.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0660 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
Image size: 938.8'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:34.285 +22:02:40.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87
Second-epoch image center 05:32:34.285 +22:02:40.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0690 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:31.434 +22:03:11.35
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:34.285 +22:02:40.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01398 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fqFdku1y7R
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lgfd3bSfwB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DTttUw9E9Z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oGqh32eD0B
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 214983 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.0944 to 91.6891 deg, Dec +16.3141 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.0944 to 91.6891 deg, Dec 16.3141 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 12395 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5815 out of 10430 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10430 out of 214983 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.835300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.835300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.61
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 214983 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.0944 to 91.6891 deg, Dec +16.3141 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.0944 to 91.6891 deg, Dec 16.3141 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 12395 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5815 out of 10430 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10430 out of 214983 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits (aperture=5.4)
Read 218722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3382 to 91.9466 deg, Dec +16.4852 to +27.3055 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3382 to 91.9466 deg, Dec 16.4852 to 27.3055 deg
Loaded 12416 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5762 out of 10440 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10440 out of 218722 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 105 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
2.3 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
2.0 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
16.2 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
16.0 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.fqFdku1y7R (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=48573, bad_region=54631, passed=214967
Got 214967 stars (including 125089 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 214967 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167444 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167443 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.818 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=275 n_q2=215 n_q3=218 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.908
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Lgfd3bSfwB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=81, blended=43565, bad_region=34967, passed=218641
Got 218641 stars (including 144662 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 218641 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 182178 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 182180 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 182180 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.386 n_q1=344 n_q2=88 n_q3=355 n_q4=149 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DTttUw9E9Z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1486, bad_region=6237, passed=35844
Got 35844 stars (including 28319 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35844 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30311 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30311 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 923 stars left (next iteration limit 1014)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits N_match=923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.611 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.509 n_q1=258 n_q2=206 n_q3=214 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.165
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oGqh32eD0B (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1123, bad_region=6019, passed=34259
Got 34259 stars (including 27293 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34259 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.467 n_q1=257 n_q2=214 n_q3=212 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.222
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-47-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_072552_TTUQ2b1x1_1904436_QTCTKvS1/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:36:37.68 +21:56:19.1: 13.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:04:24.58 +19:25:46.5: 12.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:11:53.88 +24:16:38.7: 12.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:38:01.07 +24:12:20.5: 13.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:47:08.27 +22:38:16.6: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:04:44.55 +23:50:52.4: 12.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:28:44.56 +25:02:29.1: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:47:08.27 +22:38:16.6: 12.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:38:01.07 +24:12:20.5: 13.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:01.07 +24:12:20.5: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3475 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:08.27 +22:38:16.6: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.7212 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:04:24.58 +19:25:46.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:11:53.88 +24:16:38.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:28:44.56 +25:02:29.1: 12.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:24.58 +19:25:46.5: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0022 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:53.88 +24:16:38.7: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9433 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:28:44.56 +25:02:29.1: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.9964 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:36:37.68 +21:56:19.1: 13.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:37.68 +21:56:19.1: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0484 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:04:44.55 +23:50:52.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:44.55 +23:50:52.4: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2205 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:09:20.36 +22:26:05.1: 12.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:10:19.90 +21:42:29.7: 12.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:40:42.80 +25:59:24.3: 12.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:09:20.36 +22:26:05.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:20.36 +22:26:05.1: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9723 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:10:19.90 +21:42:29.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:19.90 +21:42:29.7: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9690 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:34:07.79 +24:25:07.3: 12.26 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:40:42.80 +25:59:24.3: 12.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:25:27.33 +19:14:23.0: 12.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:40:42.80 +25:59:24.3: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8730 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:33:48.04 +20:28:14.1: 12.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:07:09.53 +23:08:33.9: 12.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:41:49.75 +24:07:55.0: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:34:07.79 +24:25:07.3: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:07.79 +24:25:07.3: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.8549 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:25:27.33 +19:14:23.0: 12.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:27.33 +19:14:23.0: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7260 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:33:48.04 +20:28:14.1: 12.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:48.04 +20:28:14.1: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5963 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:07:09.53 +23:08:33.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:41:49.75 +24:07:55.0: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:09.53 +23:08:33.9: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0898 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:49.75 +24:07:55.0: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.6773 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:07:34.67 +18:41:55.6: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:45:50.11 +22:28:31.9: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:07:47.26 +25:40:14.5: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:07:34.67 +18:41:55.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:34.67 +18:41:55.6: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6589 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:11:16.84 +21:26:07.6: 11.98 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:45:50.11 +22:28:31.9: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:11:55.41 +18:06:41.2: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:50.11 +22:28:31.9: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.5489 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:07:47.26 +25:40:14.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:47.26 +25:40:14.5: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8718 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:03:59.73 +23:54:54.9: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:36:38.05 +25:43:51.5: 12.14 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:11:16.84 +21:26:07.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:11:55.41 +18:06:41.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:16.84 +21:26:07.6: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.4656 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:55.41 +18:06:41.2: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3281 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:03:59.73 +23:54:54.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:03:59.73 +23:54:54.9: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6149 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:35:54.27 +25:28:12.5: 11.94 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:36:38.05 +25:43:51.5: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:38.05 +25:43:51.5: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.3119 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:09:08.16 +25:26:26.9: 11.84 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:08:43.80 +18:38:40.1: 11.86 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:43:16.76 +18:49:59.7: 11.16 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:35:54.27 +25:28:12.5: 11.96 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:02:22.94 +23:42:44.0: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:21:28.79 +19:18:27.7: 11.37 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:54.27 +25:28:12.5: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.1215 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:09:08.16 +25:26:26.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:08.16 +25:26:26.9: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.3854 delta=-0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:08:43.80 +18:38:40.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:43.80 +18:38:40.1: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.0755 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:21:28.79 +19:18:27.7: 11.56 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.43 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:21:28.79 +19:18:27.7: ref_mag=11.43 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8503 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:04:45.88 +23:49:44.8: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:02:22.94 +23:42:44.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:43:16.76 +18:49:59.7: 11.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:02:22.94 +23:42:44.0: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3590 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.17 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:43:16.76 +18:49:59.7: ref_mag=11.17 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5923 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:04:45.88 +23:49:44.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:45.88 +23:49:44.8: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2428 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:09:01.99 +24:21:02.6: 11.05 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:30:46.30 +22:39:44.3: 16.80 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:09:01.99 +24:21:02.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:03:22.51 +24:29:23.0: 11.30 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.05 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:12:10.23 +24:15:52.5: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:01.99 +24:21:02.6: ref_mag=11.05 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4631 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:06:58.03 +23:06:57.2: 11.51 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:14:32.67 +22:38:45.5: 16.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:30:46.30 +22:39:44.3: 16.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.80 +/- 0.32
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:30:46.30 +22:39:44.3: ref_mag=16.80 +/- 0.32 new_mean_mag=11.2557 delta=5.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:03:22.51 +24:29:23.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:47:39.10 +25:58:33.9: 11.41 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:12:10.23 +24:15:52.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.30 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:03:22.51 +24:29:23.0: ref_mag=11.30 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5290 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:10.23 +24:15:52.5: ref_mag=11.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7998 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:06:58.03 +23:06:57.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.51 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:06:58.03 +23:06:57.2: ref_mag=11.51 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.0171 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:14:32.67 +22:38:45.5: 16.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:41:09.69 +24:42:13.9: 16.72 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:47:39.10 +25:58:33.9: 11.49 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.45 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:39.10 +25:58:33.9: ref_mag=11.45 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7149 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:35:40.69 +25:16:06.4: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:19:01.03 +19:04:30.8: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:41:09.69 +24:42:13.9: 16.82 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.76 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:41:09.69 +24:42:13.9: ref_mag=16.76 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=12.0235 delta=4.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:35:54.50 +21:02:28.7: 11.88 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:35:40.69 +25:16:06.4: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:40.69 +25:16:06.4: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.2609 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:19:01.03 +19:04:30.8: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:19:01.03 +19:04:30.8: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.2932 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:07:44.63 +24:49:13.0: 12.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:35:54.50 +21:02:28.7: 11.80 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:54.50 +21:02:28.7: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.1232 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:49:03.27 +24:36:31.5: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:07:11.94 +24:37:14.2: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:07:44.63 +24:49:13.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:44.63 +24:49:13.0: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7759 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:49:03.27 +24:36:31.5: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:03.27 +24:36:31.5: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3027 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:32:36.56 +21:21:00.1: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:07:11.94 +24:37:14.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:11.94 +24:37:14.2: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7492 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:32:36.56 +21:21:00.1: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:36.56 +21:21:00.1: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5265 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:41:31.33 +22:03:44.7: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:05:10.44 +23:30:07.4: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:41:00.81 +24:20:40.3: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:41:31.33 +22:03:44.7: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:31.33 +22:03:44.7: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.4485 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:08:33.13 +25:03:55.7: 12.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:41:00.81 +24:20:40.3: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:00.81 +24:20:40.3: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5988 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:08:33.13 +25:03:55.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:33.13 +25:03:55.7: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9665 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:05:10.44 +23:30:07.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:05:06.76 +23:48:49.8: 12.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:10.44 +23:30:07.4: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8275 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:41:52.48 +24:19:34.5: 12.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:41:52.48 +24:19:34.5: 12.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:05:06.76 +23:48:49.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:45:31.17 +24:47:03.0: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:06.76 +23:48:49.8: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8840 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:52.48 +24:19:34.5: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6555 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:35:34.63 +21:21:00.6: 12.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:45:31.17 +24:47:03.0: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:31.17 +24:47:03.0: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6932 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:27:27.31 +18:50:48.2: 12.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:35:34.63 +21:21:00.6: 12.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:34.63 +21:21:00.6: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5855 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:27:27.31 +18:50:48.2: 12.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:27.31 +18:50:48.2: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7821 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:04:52.97 +23:32:59.2: 13.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:19:09.23 +20:06:07.6: 13.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:36:08.15 +26:16:24.2: 13.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:36:08.15 +26:16:24.2: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:04:52.97 +23:32:59.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:08.15 +26:16:24.2: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0841 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:52.97 +23:32:59.2: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3610 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:19:09.23 +20:06:07.6: 13.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:19:09.23 +20:06:07.6: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9886 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:33:37.24 +23:20:18.8: 13.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:08:24.75 +22:03:41.2: 13.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:33:37.24 +23:20:18.8: 12.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:37.24 +23:20:18.8: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9844 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:08:24.75 +22:03:41.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:02:50.90 +24:19:22.4: 13.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:24.75 +22:03:41.2: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2769 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:33:51.61 +20:28:05.3: 13.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:02:50.90 +24:19:22.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:02:50.90 +24:19:22.4: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3899 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:33:51.61 +20:28:05.3: 13.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:51.61 +20:28:05.3: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0688 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:29:30.68 +20:51:57.3: 15.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:29:30.68 +20:51:57.3: 15.28 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:29:30.68 +20:51:57.3: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.9636 delta=2.15 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out291086.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out291099.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out291111.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91051.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 24s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 290953_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 290953_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 290966_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 290966_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 290969_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 290969_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 290974_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 290974_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:53.48 +26:01:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 290975_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 290975_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 290976_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 290976_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:29.60 +18:48:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 290978_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 290978_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 290982_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 290982_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:27.69 +26:06:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 290983_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 290983_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 290985_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 290985_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 290987_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 290987_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 290988_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 290988_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 290990_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 290990_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 290991_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 290991_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 290994_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 290994_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 290997_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 290997_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 290998_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 290998_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291003_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291003_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:37.40 +19:45:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291004_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291004_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291006_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291006_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:58.20 +24:15:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291008_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291008_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291013_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291013_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291016_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291016_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:04.22 +24:54:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291019_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291019_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:04.97 +22:35:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291020_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291020_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291021_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291021_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291027_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291027_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291028_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291028_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291031_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291031_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.95 +26:14:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291032_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291032_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:45.59 +17:48:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291035_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291035_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291039_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291039_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:30.27 +23:13:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291040_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291040_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291041_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291041_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291044_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291044_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291047_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291047_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291049_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291049_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291050_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291050_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291051_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291051_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291052_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291052_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:15.73 +26:10:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291054_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291054_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:49.05 +20:33:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291055_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291055_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:27.13 +18:33:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291059_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291059_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291061_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291061_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:07.03 +21:03:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291064_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291064_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:22.94 +22:40:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291065_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291065_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:16.91 +20:08:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291066_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291066_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:38.45 +23:38:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291067_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
Preparing report for the candidate 291067_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291070_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291070_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:28.24 +21:38:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291083_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291083_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291086_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
Preparing report for the candidate 291086_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291093_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291093_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291098_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291098_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291099_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
Preparing report for the candidate 291099_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291101_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291101_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:07.94 +21:23:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291102_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291102_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291104_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291104_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.12 +22:38:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291111_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
Preparing report for the candidate 291111_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291118_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291118_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291120_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291120_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291122_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291122_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291124_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291124_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:10.51 +23:20:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291137_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291137_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:03.59 +20:44:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291153_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291153_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291157_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291157_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.69 +22:27:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291159_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291159_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291169_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291169_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291175_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291175_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:08.61 +21:18:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291182_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291182_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291184_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
Preparing report for the candidate 291184_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291187_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291187_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:10.00 +18:33:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291201_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291201_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:35.65 +25:17:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291202_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291202_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291206_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291206_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.76 +19:34:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291208_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291208_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291209_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291209_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291215_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291215_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291217_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291217_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291223_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291223_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:37.07 +25:05:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291224_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291224_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291225_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291225_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291228_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291228_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:40.10 +18:13:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291229_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291229_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:32.57 +24:00:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291230_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291230_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:00.64 +20:46:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291240_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291240_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291243_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291243_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291249_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291249_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:40.18 +20:11:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291255_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291255_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.80 +22:40:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291264_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291264_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:34.68 +25:27:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291265_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291265_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291268_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291268_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.38 +18:59:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291270_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291270_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291273_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291273_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:11.42 +19:48:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291284_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291284_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.43 +18:33:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291288_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291288_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291303_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291303_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:03.96 +24:38:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291314_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291314_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291321_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291321_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.28 +22:45:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291332_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291332_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291358_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291358_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 291360_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 291360_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:18.94 +21:12:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91051_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
Preparing report for the candidate 91051_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24811_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 24811_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.40 +17:54:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63813_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268
The candidate 63813_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-48-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0268 did not pass the final checks
