This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.4473 2461247.9473 12.12 03:43:50.00 +23:27:16.9
166.46831 -24.49803 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 4.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis -0 -0 0 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:43:50.00 +23:27:16.9: 16.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:43:50.00 +23:27:16.9: 16.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4473* 03 43 50.00 +23 27 16.9 12.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9473,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4473 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.4473 2461247.9473 12.86 03:37:32.51 +22:14:25.3
166.15933 -26.36821 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales -1 -1 1 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:37:32.51 +22:14:25.3: 16.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:37:32.51 +22:14:25.3: 16.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4473* 03 37 32.51 +22 14 25.3 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9473,12.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4473 12.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.4473 2461247.9473 13.84 03:57:10.86 +18:32:42.8
172.70979 -25.87913 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 3.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.344 Desiderata -1 -1 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:57:10.86 +18:32:42.8: 16.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:57:10.86 +18:32:42.8: 16.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4473* 03 57 10.86 +18 32 42.8 13.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9473,13.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4473 13.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.4473 2461247.9473 13.82 03:51:22.33 +23:26:13.1
167.87394 -23.34080 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula -1 -1 2 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:51:22.33 +23:26:13.1: 16.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:51:22.33 +23:26:13.1: 16.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4473* 03 51 22.33 +23 26 13.1 13.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9473,13.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4473 13.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.4473 2461247.9473 14.22 03:40:01.43 +23:27:22.4
165.74746 -25.07685 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 4.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.224 Oceana -1 -1 1 14.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:40:01.43 +23:27:22.4: 16.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:40:01.43 +23:27:22.4: 16.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4473* 03 40 01.43 +23 27 22.4 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9473,14.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4473 14.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.4473 2461247.9473 14.52 03:35:33.33 +23:02:02.5
165.19406 -26.06809 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.6" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.418 Alemannia -1 -1 2 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:35:33.33 +23:02:02.5: 16.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:35:33.33 +23:02:02.5: 16.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4473* 03 35 33.33 +23 02 02.5 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9473,14.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4473 14.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Last image: 2461247.94752102 26.07.2026 10:44:15.816 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.05
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13583
Objects passed selection criteria: 13495
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8803.75
Average stars matched: 8345.5 (94.7948 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239096 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 26 11:17:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Last image: 2461247.94752102 26.07.2026 10:44:15.816 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 100
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 63 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 74114
Objects passed selection criteria: 73884
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 51871.5
Average stars matched: 48560.8 (93.6174 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 292324 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 26 11:25:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461247.94706948
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits'
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:32.575 +22:00:13.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:32.575 +22:00:13.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0062 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:34.354 +22:00:16.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:34.354 +22:00:16.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0078 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:32.575 +22:00:13.57
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:34.354 +22:00:16.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00692 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rmlBZXrCAH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7qkvxUAjvz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fki00eIFYK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pVIEhGEmWI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16676 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.4784 to +27.2944 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.4784 to 27.2944 deg
Loaded 6147 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4732 out of 5194 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5194 out of 16676 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.916900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.916900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.05
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.87
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.87
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16676 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.4784 to +27.2944 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.4784 to 27.2944 deg
Loaded 6147 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4732 out of 5194 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5194 out of 16676 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 16620 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6517 to 64.2526 deg, Dec +16.4784 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6517 to 64.2526 deg, Dec 16.4784 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4726 out of 5194 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5194 out of 16620 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
2.1 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
15.9 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.rmlBZXrCAH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1342, bad_region=3405, passed=16676
Got 16676 stars (including 12145 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16676 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.246 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.224 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.227 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.193 n_q1=376 n_q2=201 n_q3=242 n_q4=157 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.240
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7qkvxUAjvz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1357, bad_region=3432, passed=16620
Got 16620 stars (including 12060 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16620 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13409 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13409 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13409 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.227 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.217 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.180 n_q1=374 n_q2=200 n_q3=243 n_q4=157 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.237
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fki00eIFYK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=365, bad_region=1158, passed=5586
Got 5586 stars (including 4129 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5586 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4512 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4512 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4512 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=968 robust_rms=6.498 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=968 robust_rms=0.516 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=968 robust_rms_before=1.181 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.469 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.516 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.469 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.478 n_q1=256 n_q2=137 n_q3=298 n_q4=277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.143
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pVIEhGEmWI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=333, bad_region=1117, passed=5623
Got 5623 stars (including 4227 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5623 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4579 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4579 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=968 robust_rms=6.585 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=968 robust_rms=0.490 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=968 robust_rms_before=1.145 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.429 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.490 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.429 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.409 n_q1=253 n_q2=137 n_q3=306 n_q4=272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.052
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits sigma_overall=0.246 worst_q_ratio=1.240
ref2=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits sigma_overall=0.240 worst_q_ratio=1.237
new1=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits sigma_overall=0.475 worst_q_ratio=1.143
new2=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits sigma_overall=0.416 worst_q_ratio=1.052
reference average sigma_overall=0.243 worst_q_ratio=1.2385
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:32.575 +22:00:13.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:32.575 +22:00:13.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0062 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:34.354 +22:00:16.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:34.354 +22:00:16.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0078 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:32.575 +22:00:13.57
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:34.354 +22:00:16.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00692 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.otUWlXbtb4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CVZIKYycOI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sUViBPRG8C
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits &> /tmp/tmp.15YKBTqSpF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 88883 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6567 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.4784 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6567 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.4784 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4048 out of 5195 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5195 out of 88883 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.800100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.800100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 88883 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6567 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.4784 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6567 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.4784 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4048 out of 5195 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5195 out of 88883 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 89152 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6517 to 64.2526 deg, Dec +16.4684 to +27.2928 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6517 to 64.2526 deg, Dec 16.4684 to 27.2928 deg
Loaded 6156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4023 out of 5194 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5194 out of 89152 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 90 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
2.1 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
16.1 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
16.1 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.otUWlXbtb4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=7709, bad_region=15156, passed=88855
Got 88855 stars (including 66960 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88855 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75072 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75072 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75072 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 981 stars left (next iteration limit 1079)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits N_match=981 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.206 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.218 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.183 n_q1=366 n_q2=197 n_q3=250 n_q4=168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.246
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CVZIKYycOI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=7668, bad_region=15198, passed=89121
Got 89121 stars (including 67234 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 89121 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.208 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.232 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.175 n_q1=367 n_q2=197 n_q3=251 n_q4=165 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.359
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sUViBPRG8C (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1471, bad_region=5606, passed=36920
Got 36920 stars (including 30094 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36920 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.509 n_q1=261 n_q2=142 n_q3=294 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.099
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.15YKBTqSpF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1366, bad_region=5238, passed=35082
Got 35082 stars (including 28658 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35082 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30335 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30334 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.434 n_q1=263 n_q2=136 n_q3=304 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.111
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-43-36_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_072146_TTUQ2b1x1_1582498_SgCwERac/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:25:37.54 +22:13:19.4: 13.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:25:53.50 +26:09:35.4: 13.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:49:03.85 +19:19:58.7: 13.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:47:54.40 +25:09:17.4: 13.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:43:50.00 +23:27:16.9: 16.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:50:34.56 +24:30:26.4: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:42:21.40 +19:39:46.0: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:50:20.73 +24:28:29.3: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:25:37.54 +22:13:19.4: 13.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:47:54.40 +25:09:17.4: 13.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:25:53.50 +26:09:35.4: 13.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:37.54 +22:13:19.4: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.6577 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:54.40 +25:09:17.4: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7389 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:49:03.85 +19:19:58.7: 13.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:53.50 +26:09:35.4: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.5158 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:03.85 +19:19:58.7: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2040 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:43:50.00 +23:27:16.9: 16.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:50:34.56 +24:30:26.4: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:34.56 +24:30:26.4: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4967 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:50:20.73 +24:28:29.3: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:42:21.40 +19:39:46.0: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:20.73 +24:28:29.3: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4810 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:21.40 +19:39:46.0: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4712 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:36:22.11 +18:20:55.6: 12.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:51:30.82 +25:08:23.8: 12.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:37:32.51 +22:14:25.3: 16.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:36:22.11 +18:20:55.6: 12.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:36:22.11 +18:20:55.6: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6418 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:50:31.46 +24:31:44.2: 13.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:51:30.82 +25:08:23.8: 12.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:30.82 +25:08:23.8: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6358 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:37:32.51 +22:14:25.3: 16.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:50:31.46 +24:31:44.2: 13.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:59:08.21 +23:38:39.8: 13.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:31.46 +24:31:44.2: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0964 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:59:08.21 +23:38:39.8: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:08.21 +23:38:39.8: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1861 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:47:57.53 +23:25:36.5: 13.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:49:42.88 +21:10:23.1: 13.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:31:18.56 +17:58:03.1: 13.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:39:09.99 +24:43:29.0: 13.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:31:18.56 +17:58:03.1: 13.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:18.56 +17:58:03.1: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4493 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:47:57.53 +23:25:36.5: 13.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:49:42.88 +21:10:23.1: 13.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:57.53 +23:25:36.5: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2897 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:42.88 +21:10:23.1: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3443 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:39:09.99 +24:43:29.0: 13.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:09.99 +24:43:29.0: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.4549 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:49:20.69 +24:15:54.3: 13.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:47:31.56 +24:33:33.8: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:49:20.69 +24:15:54.3: 13.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:20.69 +24:15:54.3: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5575 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:49:41.83 +22:31:16.5: 13.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:47:31.56 +24:33:33.8: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:46:18.93 +19:36:43.5: 13.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:31.56 +24:33:33.8: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5220 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:58:14.67 +24:04:19.7: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:49:41.83 +22:31:16.5: 13.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:41.83 +22:31:16.5: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6259 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:46:18.93 +19:36:43.5: 13.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:18.93 +19:36:43.5: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6142 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:58:14.67 +24:04:19.7: 13.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:14.67 +24:04:19.7: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7253 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 04:00:36.02 +21:52:26.6: 13.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:37:59.95 +18:28:49.8: 13.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:57:10.86 +18:32:42.8: 16.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 04:00:36.02 +21:52:26.6: 13.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:36.02 +21:52:26.6: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.7602 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:55:20.79 +23:20:37.4: 13.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:37:59.95 +18:28:49.8: 13.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:37:59.95 +18:28:49.8: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7559 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:57:10.86 +18:32:42.8: 16.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:51:22.33 +23:26:13.1: 16.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:46:17.18 +23:06:44.6: 14.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:55:20.79 +23:20:37.4: 13.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:20.79 +23:20:37.4: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8183 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:46:08.90 +24:04:17.5: 13.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:51:22.33 +23:26:13.1: 16.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:46:17.18 +23:06:44.6: 14.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:17.18 +23:06:44.6: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9435 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:34:14.28 +24:34:48.1: 14.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:50:35.96 +24:48:01.0: 14.02 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:46:08.90 +24:04:17.5: 13.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:08.90 +24:04:17.5: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8705 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:50:35.96 +24:48:01.0: 14.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:34:14.28 +24:34:48.1: 14.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:35.96 +24:48:01.0: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1712 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:14.28 +24:34:48.1: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0703 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:43:57.77 +25:54:05.4: 14.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:54:26.46 +18:38:29.7: 13.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:43:57.77 +25:54:05.4: 13.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:57.77 +25:54:05.4: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0590 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:54:26.46 +18:38:29.7: 13.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:26.46 +18:38:29.7: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=14.0814 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:40:57.60 +25:28:58.0: 14.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:44:58.55 +19:34:15.0: 14.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:44:58.55 +19:34:15.0: 14.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:58.55 +19:34:15.0: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2921 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:34:23.67 +19:48:46.4: 14.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:40:57.60 +25:28:58.0: 14.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:40:01.43 +23:27:22.4: 16.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:57.60 +25:28:58.0: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.3476 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:39:37.06 +22:51:27.7: 14.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:35:33.33 +23:02:02.5: 16.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:35:33.33 +23:02:02.5: 16.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:40:01.43 +23:27:22.4: 16.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:34:23.67 +19:48:46.4: 14.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:23.67 +19:48:46.4: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.4027 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:39:37.06 +22:51:27.7: 14.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:37.06 +22:51:27.7: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.3935 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:41:27.44 +23:29:32.2: 14.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:41:27.44 +23:29:32.2: 14.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:41:27.44 +23:29:32.2: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1899 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out106030.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out107088.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out109442.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out109826.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out111409.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out111602.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104645_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 104645_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:46.53 +24:19:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104650_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 104650_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:10.80 +21:00:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104652_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 104652_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104655_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 104655_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104658_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 104658_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104659_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 104659_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105282_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 105282_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105668_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 105668_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105803_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 105803_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:04.14 +25:32:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105955_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 105955_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105987_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 105987_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106030_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 106030_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106194_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 106194_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106458_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 106458_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106461_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 106461_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106515_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 106515_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106540_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 106540_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106558_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 106558_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:20.00 +24:01:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106667_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 106667_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:07.48 +24:00:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106707_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 106707_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106754_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 106754_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106825_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 106825_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:39:54.73 +25:11:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106959_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 106959_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:54.16 +23:08:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106961_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 106961_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107088_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 107088_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107192_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 107192_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107433_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 107433_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107471_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 107471_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:27:02.54 +24:51:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107496_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 107496_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:40.48 +23:40:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107513_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 107513_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107518_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 107518_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:07.43 +23:38:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107616_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 107616_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:28.65 +22:02:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107830_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 107830_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:24.17 +22:45:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107833_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 107833_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:01.19 +24:05:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107896_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 107896_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:15.28 +23:59:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107924_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 107924_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107934_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 107934_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:11.56 +25:33:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107938_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 107938_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:22.84 +26:10:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108016_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 108016_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:56.18 +23:09:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108019_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 108019_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:51.37 +23:11:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108020_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 108020_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:08.41 +23:20:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108051_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 108051_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:50.24 +24:29:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108101_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 108101_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108175_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 108175_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:23.84 +18:13:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108182_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 108182_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108224_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 108224_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108275_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 108275_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108346_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 108346_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:12.91 +23:36:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108347_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 108347_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:23.40 +24:31:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108562_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 108562_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:55.23 +24:15:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108629_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 108629_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:27.81 +20:49:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108664_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 108664_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108822_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 108822_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:41.93 +24:55:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108861_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 108861_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108906_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 108906_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108963_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 108963_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108974_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 108974_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:11.27 +25:53:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109004_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 109004_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109058_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 109058_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:41:23.25 +24:59:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109107_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 109107_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109228_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 109228_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:11.28 +22:47:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109235_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 109235_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:16.08 +17:49:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109262_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 109262_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:02.06 +23:53:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109358_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 109358_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109372_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 109372_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:22:37.35 +24:53:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109402_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 109402_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:03.96 +24:10:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109415_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 109415_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109442_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 109442_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109604_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 109604_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109608_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 109608_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109825_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 109825_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:15.06 +24:34:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109826_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 109826_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109890_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 109890_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109897_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 109897_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:27.89 +23:53:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110220_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 110220_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110236_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 110236_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110601_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 110601_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110680_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 110680_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110951_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 110951_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111126_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 111126_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111142_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 111142_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111171_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 111171_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111322_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 111322_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:37.70 +24:47:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111384_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 111384_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:58.85 +21:01:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111403_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 111403_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111409_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 111409_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111447_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 111447_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111602_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 111602_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36963_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 36963_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79761_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 79761_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-44-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
