This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4487* 05 11 51.21 +22 59 31.5 6.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9487,6.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4487 6.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.4487 2461247.9487 9.12 05:30:28.12 +21:38:30.9
184.36266 -6.77971 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1 Ceres -2 1 2 9.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:30:28.12 +21:38:30.9: 14.33 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:30:28.12 +21:38:30.9: 14.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4487* 05 30 28.12 +21 38 30.9 9.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9487,9.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4487 9.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4487* 05 11 51.21 +22 59 31.4 7.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9487,7.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4487 7.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.4487 2461247.9487 11.24 05:30:46.17 +22:39:44.8
183.53728 -6.16836 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe -0 1 1 11.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:30:46.17 +22:39:44.8: 16.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:30:46.17 +22:39:44.8: 16.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4487* 05 30 46.17 +22 39 44.8 11.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9487,11.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4487 11.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.4487 2461247.9487 11.90 05:14:32.57 +22:38:45.3
181.45245 -9.29050 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope 0 -0 0 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:14:32.57 +22:38:45.3: 16.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:14:32.57 +22:38:45.3: 16.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4487* 05 14 32.57 +22 38 45.3 11.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9487,11.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4487 11.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.4487 2461247.9487 12.06 05:41:09.48 +24:42:15.6
183.08260 -3.06681 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania 0 1 1 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:41:09.48 +24:42:15.6: 16.81 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:41:09.48 +24:42:15.6: 16.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.81 +/- 0.33
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4487* 05 41 09.48 +24 42 15.6 12.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9487,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4487 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4487* 05 11 15.05 +23 03 08.8 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461247.9487,12.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260726.4487 12.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.4487 2461247.9487 13.56 05:20:46.31 +23:39:13.2
181.42874 -7.53975 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.179 Klytaemnestra 1 1 2 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:20:46.31 +23:39:13.2: 16.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:20:46.31 +23:39:13.2: 16.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4487* 05 20 46.31 +23 39 13.2 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9487,13.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4487 13.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
First image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
Last image: 2461247.94902602 26.07.2026 10:46:25.848 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.92
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 33 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 38887
Objects passed selection criteria: 38724
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 24204.8
Average stars matched: 23749 (98.1171 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 264284 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 26 07:08:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
First image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
Last image: 2461247.94902602 26.07.2026 10:46:25.848 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 98
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.69
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 1130 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 193550
Objects passed selection criteria: 192931
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 125566
Average stars matched: 118848 (94.6491 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2074692 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 26 07:43:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461247.94833738
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits'
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Image size: 942.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:27.369 +21:58:55.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87
Second-epoch image center 05:32:27.369 +21:58:55.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0385 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:24.521 +21:59:28.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87
Second-epoch image center 05:32:24.521 +21:59:28.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0242 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:27.369 +21:58:55.55
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:24.521 +21:59:28.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01427 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6KISRdaRT0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lz9nz70W9N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m0lglz7HCV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hkeIOngn3u
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 47923 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1673 to 91.6837 deg, Dec +16.3329 to +27.3626 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1673 to 91.6837 deg, Dec 16.3329 to 27.3626 deg
Loaded 12332 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8546 out of 10425 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10425 out of 47923 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.967950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.967950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.92
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.05
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.05
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 47923 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1673 to 91.6837 deg, Dec +16.3329 to +27.3626 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1673 to 91.6837 deg, Dec 16.3329 to 27.3626 deg
Loaded 12332 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8546 out of 10425 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10425 out of 47923 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits (aperture=6.8)
Read 40714 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3529 to 91.9466 deg, Dec +16.4869 to +27.3012 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3529 to 91.9466 deg, Dec 16.4869 to 27.3012 deg
Loaded 12401 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8554 out of 10411 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10411 out of 40714 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
2.4 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
2.6 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
16.0 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
15.9 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 10.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.6KISRdaRT0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=6443, bad_region=1, passed=47923
Got 47923 stars (including 41430 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47923 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46343 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.573 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.699 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.908 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.459 n_q1=186 n_q2=286 n_q3=156 n_q4=306 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.584
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Lz9nz70W9N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=5535, bad_region=0, passed=40714
Got 40714 stars (including 35116 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40714 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.439 n_q1=310 n_q2=127 n_q3=304 n_q4=191 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.165
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.m0lglz7HCV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=213, bad_region=0, passed=4468
Got 4468 stars (including 4248 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4468 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013096 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010477 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4309 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4307 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 920 stars left (next iteration limit 1013)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=920 robust_rms=7.757 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=920 robust_rms=0.448 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=920 robust_rms_before=0.954 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.351 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.448 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.351 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits N_match=920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=177 n_q2=256 n_q3=188 n_q4=299 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hkeIOngn3u (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=216, bad_region=1, passed=4332
Got 4332 stars (including 4110 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4332 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4175 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4176 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4176 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=915 robust_rms=7.948 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=915 robust_rms=0.370 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=915 robust_rms_before=0.980 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.366 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.370 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.366 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits N_match=915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.352 n_q1=178 n_q2=253 n_q3=185 n_q4=299 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.072
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits sigma_overall=0.573 worst_q_ratio=1.584
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.165
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits sigma_overall=0.349 worst_q_ratio=1.262
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits sigma_overall=0.380 worst_q_ratio=1.072
reference average sigma_overall=0.475 worst_q_ratio=1.3745
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4_astrometric_residuals.png (934 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3_astrometric_residuals.png (932 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422_astrometric_residuals.png (920 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423_astrometric_residuals.png (915 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:30:28.12 +21:38:30.9: 14.33 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:30:28.12 +21:38:30.9: 14.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:30:28.12 +21:38:30.9: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=9.1181 delta=5.20 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51737.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51723_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 51723_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51737_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 51737_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05585_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 05585_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.47 +17:54:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15602_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 15602_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.94 +20:10:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08541_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 08541_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:12.80 +18:35:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15573_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 15573_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:55.08 +20:08:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16192_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 16192_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:22.41 +20:16:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29965_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 29965_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:07.01 +23:15:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 17s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:30:28.12 +21:38:30.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Image size: 942.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:27.369 +21:58:55.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87
Second-epoch image center 05:32:27.369 +21:58:55.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0385 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:24.521 +21:59:28.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87
Second-epoch image center 05:32:24.521 +21:59:28.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0242 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:27.369 +21:58:55.55
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:24.521 +21:59:28.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01427 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vRKkgvFwRv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits &> /tmp/tmp.P43PIgbk6T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7dDMBGoc3p
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RxZbcbqjwN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 214983 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.0944 to 91.6891 deg, Dec +16.3141 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.0944 to 91.6891 deg, Dec 16.3141 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 12395 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5815 out of 10430 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10430 out of 214983 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.847400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.847400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.69
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.16
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.16
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 214983 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.0944 to 91.6891 deg, Dec +16.3141 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.0944 to 91.6891 deg, Dec 16.3141 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 12395 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5815 out of 10430 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10430 out of 214983 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits (aperture=5.5)
Read 218722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3382 to 91.9466 deg, Dec +16.4852 to +27.3055 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3382 to 91.9466 deg, Dec 16.4852 to 27.3055 deg
Loaded 12416 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5762 out of 10440 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10440 out of 218722 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 94 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
2.3 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
16.2 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
16.0 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.vRKkgvFwRv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=48573, bad_region=1, passed=214957
Got 214957 stars (including 166141 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 214957 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 209751 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 209752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 209750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.903 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.345 n_q1=189 n_q2=291 n_q3=156 n_q4=294 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.816
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.P43PIgbk6T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=81, blended=43565, bad_region=0, passed=218641
Got 218641 stars (including 174775 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 218641 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 211052 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 211053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 211052 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=298 n_q2=148 n_q3=304 n_q4=192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.064
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7dDMBGoc3p (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1070, bad_region=1, passed=35798
Got 35798 stars (including 34670 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35798 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013096 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010477 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34530 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits N_match=914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=181 n_q2=243 n_q3=188 n_q4=302 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.247
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RxZbcbqjwN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1471, bad_region=3, passed=35652
Got 35652 stars (including 34120 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35652 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34464 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits N_match=914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=187 n_q2=244 n_q3=184 n_q4=299 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.087
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-45-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0422.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_065115_TTUQ1b1x1_4067528_oMxvW0bA/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:38:01.04 +24:12:22.0: 13.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:33:48.07 +20:28:16.2: 12.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:48:34.19 +22:49:34.9: 11.80 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:09:07.90 +21:52:56.6: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:12:57.91 +19:26:33.1: 11.74 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:11:57.25 +24:41:59.6: 11.95 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:38:01.04 +24:12:22.0: 13.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:33:48.07 +20:28:16.2: 12.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:48:34.19 +22:49:34.9: 11.85 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:01.04 +24:12:22.0: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3349 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:48.07 +20:28:16.2: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5753 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:34.19 +22:49:34.9: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.3199 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:09:07.90 +21:52:56.6: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:07.90 +21:52:56.6: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.4287 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:12:57.91 +19:26:33.1: 11.78 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:30:46.17 +22:39:44.8: 16.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.76 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:57.91 +19:26:33.1: ref_mag=11.76 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9769 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:11:57.25 +24:41:59.6: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:57.25 +24:41:59.6: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.3775 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:40:29.95 +17:26:18.1: 10.78 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:30:46.17 +22:39:44.8: 16.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:14:32.57 +22:38:45.3: 16.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:40:29.95 +17:26:18.1: 10.83 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.80 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:40:29.95 +17:26:18.1: ref_mag=10.80 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8014 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:41:09.48 +24:42:15.6: 16.81 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:35:40.64 +25:16:06.4: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:14:32.57 +22:38:45.3: 16.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:41:09.48 +24:42:15.6: 16.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.81 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:41:09.48 +24:42:15.6: ref_mag=16.81 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=12.0530 delta=4.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:19:01.01 +19:04:31.1: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:35:40.64 +25:16:06.4: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:40.64 +25:16:06.4: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.3376 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:32:36.48 +21:21:02.2: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:19:01.01 +19:04:31.1: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:19:01.01 +19:04:31.1: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.3898 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:32:36.48 +21:21:02.2: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:36.48 +21:21:02.2: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4297 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:35:34.62 +21:21:02.6: 12.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:41:30.55 +17:34:08.4: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:35:34.62 +21:21:02.6: 12.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:34.62 +21:21:02.6: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5248 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:41:52.38 +24:19:35.3: 12.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:29:27.81 +25:09:12.4: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:41:30.55 +17:34:08.4: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:30.55 +17:34:08.4: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1275 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:41:52.38 +24:19:35.3: 12.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:52.38 +24:19:35.3: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6532 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:29:27.81 +25:09:12.4: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:29:27.81 +25:09:12.4: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9150 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:43:32.58 +26:25:40.1: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:41:00.85 +24:20:40.0: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:43:32.58 +26:25:40.1: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:43:32.58 +26:25:40.1: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7649 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:41:00.85 +24:20:40.0: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:00.85 +24:20:40.0: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6069 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:19:09.19 +20:06:07.9: 13.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:19:09.19 +20:06:07.9: 13.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:36:26.68 +24:19:32.8: 13.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:19:09.19 +20:06:07.9: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9163 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:35:02.28 +24:18:49.6: 13.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:30:21.59 +25:20:29.4: 13.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:36:26.68 +24:19:32.8: 13.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:26.68 +24:19:32.8: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1604 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:35:02.28 +24:18:49.6: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:02.28 +24:18:49.6: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9677 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:33:51.67 +20:28:06.3: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:30:21.59 +25:20:29.4: 13.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.59 +25:20:29.4: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2704 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:33:51.67 +20:28:06.3: 13.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:51.67 +20:28:06.3: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9937 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_stack4.fits at 05:20:46.31 +23:39:13.2: 16.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_stack3.fits at 05:20:46.31 +23:39:13.2: 16.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out250710.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out250777.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out250895.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out251293.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250538_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250538_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250554_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250554_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:37.65 +23:54:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250556_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250556_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:12.86 +24:49:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250558_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250558_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250562_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250562_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:32.93 +26:13:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250564_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250564_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:04.28 +24:54:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250566_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250566_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250567_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250567_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:06.37 +22:35:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250570_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250570_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:12.86 +21:57:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250574_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250574_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:54.18 +25:28:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250575_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250575_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250577_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250577_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250581_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250581_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:27.15 +18:33:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250582_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250582_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:29.54 +23:08:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 250584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250599_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250599_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:28.08 +21:38:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250639_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250639_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:42.79 +23:02:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250710_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 250710_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250720_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250720_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:16.56 +18:58:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250727_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250727_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250766_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250766_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:07.85 +21:23:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250777_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 250777_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250816_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250816_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.06 +22:38:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250870_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250870_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:49.68 +26:44:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250888_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250888_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:31.44 +24:58:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250895_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 250895_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250930_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250930_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250932_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250932_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:17.10 +17:02:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250936_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250936_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:10.49 +23:20:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250938_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250938_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:03.03 +23:18:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250976_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250976_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.73 +22:27:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250990_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250990_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:14.35 +23:18:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250999_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 250999_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251002_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251002_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:52.84 +19:44:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251008_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251008_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.99 +26:25:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:03.79 +20:44:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251029_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251029_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:03.20 +24:36:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251034_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251034_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251043_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251043_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.61 +25:55:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251046_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251046_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:41.64 +23:02:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251058_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251058_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:19.45 +24:25:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251061_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251061_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:36.22 +17:26:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251065_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251065_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:01.67 +26:45:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251092_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251092_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:32.51 +24:00:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251100_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251100_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251102_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 251102_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251107_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251107_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251129_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251129_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251149_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251149_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:36.97 +25:05:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251159_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251159_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:30.32 +25:19:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251165_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251165_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:51.78 +17:14:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251167_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251167_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.70 +19:34:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251174_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251174_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251187_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251187_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:48.58 +25:09:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251189_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251189_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.68 +22:40:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251190_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251190_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.95 +20:10:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251191_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251191_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:34.60 +25:27:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251193_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251193_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:13.83 +21:51:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251203_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251203_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:54.79 +22:33:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251207_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251207_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251213_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251213_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:04.04 +23:13:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251221_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251221_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.44 +21:46:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251234_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251234_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251235_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251235_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251243_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251243_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.19 +22:45:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251244_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251244_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251247_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251247_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251278_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251278_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:46.32 +20:08:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251285_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 251285_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.23 +23:00:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251293_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
Preparing report for the candidate 251293_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145534_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 145534_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:07.02 +23:15:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79661_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 79661_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:22.42 +20:16:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23843_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 23843_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:26.07 +17:43:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11021_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 11021_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:14.38 +17:03:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24811_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 24811_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.47 +17:54:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 158624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:29.08 +24:10:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63813_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 63813_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:09.57 +19:28:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140080_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 140080_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:36.88 +23:10:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85653_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 85653_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:32.92 +20:37:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81479_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 81479_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.43 +20:22:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109128_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 109128_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:50.53 +21:45:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42122_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 42122_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:00.31 +18:21:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36777_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 36777_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:37.81 +18:24:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80573_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 80573_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.11 +20:22:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165540_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 165540_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.75 +26:10:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78999_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 78999_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.95 +20:10:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111563_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 111563_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:53.40 +21:35:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136064_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 136064_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:07.24 +22:50:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09419_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 09419_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:03.80 +17:02:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 77584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:55.07 +20:08:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66688_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423
The candidate 66688_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423 did not pass the final checks
