This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.4556 2461247.9556 11.77 05:59:29.37 +33:32:24.6
177.53359 4.88948 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.89 Julia 0 -0 0 11.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:59:29.37 +33:32:24.6: 16.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:59:29.37 +33:32:24.6: 16.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9556,11.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4556 11.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.4556 2461247.9556 12.43 05:51:58.07 +31:22:15.5
178.61920 2.43005 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.250 Bettina 2 -1 2 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:51:58.07 +31:22:15.5: 16.48 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:51:58.07 +31:22:15.5: 16.39 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.43 +/- 0.19
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9556,12.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4556 12.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
Last image: 2461247.95586525 26.07.2026 10:56:16.758 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.91
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 54935
Objects passed selection criteria: 54600
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.1 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.1 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 30719.8
Average stars matched: 29729.8 (96.7773 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 276052 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 26 09:39:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
Last image: 2461247.95586525 26.07.2026 10:56:16.758 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 74
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.66
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 759 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 266843
Objects passed selection criteria: 265950
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 158818
Average stars matched: 152843 (96.238 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2331252 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 26 10:08:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461247.95533160
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits'
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:06.566 +29:58:57.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:06.566 +29:58:57.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0268 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:08.988 +29:58:34.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:08.988 +29:58:34.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0375 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:06.566 +29:58:57.04
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:08.988 +29:58:34.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01073 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XsQQIRgDGZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits &> /tmp/tmp.40uqHYBpMY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o2l8BqbtKI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits &> /tmp/tmp.turfVooX9M
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 59032 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5696 to 99.6817 deg, Dec +24.3390 to +35.3067 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5696 to 99.6817 deg, Dec 24.3390 to 35.3067 deg
Loaded 17127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11106 out of 14210 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14210 out of 59032 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.914400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.914400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.91
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.00
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.00
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 59032 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5696 to 99.6817 deg, Dec +24.3390 to +35.3067 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5696 to 99.6817 deg, Dec 24.3390 to 35.3067 deg
Loaded 17127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11106 out of 14210 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14210 out of 59032 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 59198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5698 to 99.6891 deg, Dec +24.3394 to +35.3126 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5698 to 99.6891 deg, Dec 24.3394 to 35.3126 deg
Loaded 17144 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11087 out of 14183 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14183 out of 59198 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
2.4 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
16.0 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
16.0 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
12.5 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
12.4 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.4 (SNR ) 9.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.XsQQIRgDGZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=9801, bad_region=0, passed=59032
Got 59032 stars (including 49178 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59032 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57725 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57725 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.449 n_q1=226 n_q2=259 n_q3=226 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.054
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.40uqHYBpMY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=9838, bad_region=0, passed=59198
Got 59198 stars (including 49304 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59198 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58232 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58232 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58232 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.431 n_q1=230 n_q2=251 n_q3=220 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.o2l8BqbtKI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=282, bad_region=0, passed=2830
Got 2830 stars (including 2547 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2830 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2751 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2751 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 925 stars left (next iteration limit 1017)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=925 robust_rms=7.183 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=925 robust_rms=0.366 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=925 robust_rms_before=0.862 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.366 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.366 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.366 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits N_match=925 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=249 n_q2=185 n_q3=322 n_q4=169 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.turfVooX9M (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=290, bad_region=0, passed=2650
Got 2650 stars (including 2356 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2650 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 923 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=923 robust_rms=7.599 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=923 robust_rms=0.362 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=923 robust_rms_before=0.872 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.384 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.362 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.384 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits N_match=923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=244 n_q2=183 n_q3=322 n_q4=174 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.187
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits sigma_overall=0.434 worst_q_ratio=1.054
ref2=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits sigma_overall=0.429 worst_q_ratio=1.103
new1=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits sigma_overall=0.368 worst_q_ratio=1.205
new2=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits sigma_overall=0.378 worst_q_ratio=1.187
reference average sigma_overall=0.4315 worst_q_ratio=1.0785
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5_astrometric_residuals.png (934 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430_astrometric_residuals.png (925 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431_astrometric_residuals.png (923 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:06.566 +29:58:57.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:06.566 +29:58:57.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0268 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:08.988 +29:58:34.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:08.988 +29:58:34.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0375 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:06.566 +29:58:57.04
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:08.988 +29:58:34.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01073 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zl7elDrx7V
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4GyBWW8wMg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eZlxd3UcfG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VkXqU6yf7D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 290119 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5613 to 99.6890 deg, Dec +24.3182 to +35.3067 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5613 to 99.6890 deg, Dec 24.3182 to 35.3067 deg
Loaded 17188 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6381 out of 14244 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14244 out of 290119 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.811600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.811600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.66
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 290119 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5613 to 99.6890 deg, Dec +24.3182 to +35.3067 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5613 to 99.6890 deg, Dec 24.3182 to 35.3067 deg
Loaded 17188 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6381 out of 14244 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14244 out of 290119 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits (aperture=5.3)
Read 290640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5698 to 99.6891 deg, Dec +24.3253 to +35.3143 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5698 to 99.6891 deg, Dec 24.3253 to 35.3143 deg
Loaded 17176 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6408 out of 14213 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14213 out of 290640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 71 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
2.3 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
16.1 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
16.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.9 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zl7elDrx7V (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=44, blended=81179, bad_region=3, passed=290075
Got 290075 stars (including 208578 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 290075 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 287165 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 287163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 287163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.457 n_q1=232 n_q2=257 n_q3=234 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4GyBWW8wMg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=81329, bad_region=1, passed=290610
Got 290610 stars (including 208966 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 290610 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 286923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 286922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 286922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.450 n_q1=233 n_q2=260 n_q3=228 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.191
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eZlxd3UcfG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1233, bad_region=1, passed=29509
Got 29509 stars (including 28231 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29509 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=252 n_q2=174 n_q3=321 n_q4=180 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.209
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VkXqU6yf7D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1097, bad_region=0, passed=28471
Got 28471 stars (including 27338 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28471 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits N_match=924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.392 n_q1=249 n_q2=171 n_q3=326 n_q4=178 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.191
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_064912_TTUQ1b1x1_4059235_0nNC3ty4/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 06:06:58.29 +32:10:42.2: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:34:19.73 +27:37:53.2: 11.84 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:44:54.50 +27:54:47.9: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:24:37.16 +29:20:47.4: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:36:36.37 +33:19:10.7: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:46:55.26 +29:46:03.6: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 06:09:15.93 +34:44:59.7: 11.86 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:44:23.13 +34:36:51.6: 11.71 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 06:06:58.29 +32:10:42.2: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:44:54.50 +27:54:47.9: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:34:19.73 +27:37:53.2: 11.91 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:58.29 +32:10:42.2: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9063 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:24:37.16 +29:20:47.4: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:19.73 +27:37:53.2: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.2547 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:54.50 +27:54:47.9: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.2887 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:36:36.37 +33:19:10.7: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:46:55.26 +29:46:03.6: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:37.16 +29:20:47.4: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.5578 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:36.37 +33:19:10.7: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.4547 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:55.26 +29:46:03.6: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.3000 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:45:21.25 +27:38:22.0: 11.49 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 06:09:15.93 +34:44:59.7: 11.90 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:09:15.93 +34:44:59.7: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8736 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:44:23.13 +34:36:51.6: 11.74 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:23.13 +34:36:51.6: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.1569 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:45:21.25 +27:38:22.0: 11.49 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.49 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:21.25 +27:38:22.0: ref_mag=11.49 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8195 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:30:14.53 +32:42:37.0: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 06:04:59.27 +28:22:49.5: 11.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:52:21.99 +32:31:09.0: 11.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:52:16.61 +32:31:41.0: 10.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:52:47.02 +32:33:18.2: 10.49 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:37:11.38 +34:48:46.4: 9.94 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:26:00.86 +28:32:52.1: 11.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:30:14.53 +32:42:37.0: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:52:21.99 +32:31:09.0: 11.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:14.53 +32:42:37.0: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9136 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 06:04:59.27 +28:22:49.5: 11.22 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:21.99 +32:31:09.0: ref_mag=11.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.4511 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.21 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:59.27 +28:22:49.5: ref_mag=11.21 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4377 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:52:16.61 +32:31:41.0: 10.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:52:20.34 +32:33:48.2: 11.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:16.61 +32:31:41.0: ref_mag=10.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.0941 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:52:47.02 +32:33:18.2: 10.55 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:37:11.38 +34:48:46.4: 9.95 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.52 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.95 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:47.02 +32:33:18.2: ref_mag=10.52 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8569 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:11.38 +34:48:46.4: ref_mag=9.95 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3585 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:26:00.86 +28:32:52.1: 11.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:26:00.86 +28:32:52.1: ref_mag=11.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1368 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:26:43.28 +33:49:16.2: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:52:20.34 +32:33:48.2: 11.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:20.34 +32:33:48.2: ref_mag=11.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.2478 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 06:32:00.70 +24:22:12.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:59:29.37 +33:32:24.6: 16.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:26:38.69 +28:35:10.3: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:26:43.28 +33:49:16.2: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:26:43.28 +33:49:16.2: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8930 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:48:13.54 +33:18:04.7: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:26:38.69 +28:35:10.3: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:59:29.37 +33:32:24.6: 16.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 06:32:00.70 +24:22:12.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:00.70 +24:22:12.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:26:38.69 +28:35:10.3: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8690 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:52:48.76 +33:56:55.0: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:56:24.84 +28:59:02.6: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:48:13.54 +33:18:04.7: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:39:20.83 +30:53:55.9: 12.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:13.54 +33:18:04.7: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1393 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:51:54.32 +33:38:12.0: 12.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:52:48.76 +33:56:55.0: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:56:24.84 +28:59:02.6: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:48.76 +33:56:55.0: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5287 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:24.84 +28:59:02.6: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2631 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:39:20.83 +30:53:55.9: 12.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:20.83 +30:53:55.9: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8327 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:51:54.32 +33:38:12.0: 12.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:51:54.32 +33:38:12.0: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6587 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:51:58.07 +31:22:15.5: 16.48 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:51:58.07 +31:22:15.5: 16.39 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.43 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:51:58.07 +31:22:15.5: ref_mag=16.43 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=12.4016 delta=4.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out300962.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out323346.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323034_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323034_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323035_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323035_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323039_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323039_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323043_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323043_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323045_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323045_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323047_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323047_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:51.09 +30:19:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323050_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323050_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:11.49 +30:41:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323053_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323053_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:36.50 +34:04:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323055_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323055_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323056_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323056_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323057_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323057_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:40.89 +34:43:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323058_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323058_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323059_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323059_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:17.84 +32:36:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323063_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323063_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323064_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323064_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323065_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323065_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:53.56 +29:40:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323069_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323069_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:15.16 +32:30:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323072_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323072_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323073_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323073_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:19.87 +32:31:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323074_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323074_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.06 +34:07:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323075_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323075_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323077_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323077_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:15.79 +32:31:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323079_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323079_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323080_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323080_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:14.61 +32:34:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323081_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323081_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323082_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323082_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:17.92 +32:31:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323083_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323083_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:55.81 +30:10:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323085_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323085_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323128_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323128_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323184_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323184_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323191_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323191_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:22.02 +32:33:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323221_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323221_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.30 +32:03:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323227_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323227_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323254_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323254_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.45 +34:26:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323255_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323255_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323264_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323264_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323300_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323300_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323346_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 323346_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323376_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323376_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:08.93 +31:03:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323407_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323407_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.39 +27:56:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323428_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323428_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:21.68 +27:35:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323485_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323485_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.68 +34:23:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323505_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323505_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:16.03 +32:35:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323507_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323507_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323521_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323521_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:09.84 +34:55:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323540_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323540_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:52.63 +27:35:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323582_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323582_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323596_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323596_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323612_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323612_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:39.04 +31:52:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323631_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323631_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323634_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323634_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:19.42 +31:39:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323650_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323650_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:16.73 +32:45:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323662_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323662_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323666_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 323666_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.09 +33:06:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 300962_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 300962_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263513_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 263513_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:00.54 +25:17:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147426_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 147426_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.82 +29:51:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105315_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 105315_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:37.78 +31:24:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214178_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 214178_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:49.13 +27:36:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209323_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 209323_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.26 +27:29:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108112_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 108112_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:12.66 +30:56:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199194_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 199194_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:54.31 +27:45:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188617_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 188617_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.04 +28:29:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86422_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 86422_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:03.08 +32:03:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184521_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 184521_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:27.69 +28:29:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235233_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 235233_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157688_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 157688_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:47.39 +29:32:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88606_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 88606_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:16.97 +31:35:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106473_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 106473_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:57.71 +31:24:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119511_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 119511_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:42.52 +30:33:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217071_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 217071_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_05-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks