This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4096* 04 10 01.51 +20 52 29.3 7.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9096,7.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4096 7.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.4096 2461247.9096 12.71 04:18:20.83 +26:07:31.7
170.45000 -17.10683 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.63 Ausonia 0 -0 0 12.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits at 04:18:20.83 +26:07:31.7: 16.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits at 04:18:20.83 +26:07:31.7: 16.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4096* 04 18 20.83 +26 07 31.7 12.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9096,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4096 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.4096 2461247.9096 13.01 04:36:27.74 +21:43:06.2
176.76766 -16.89053 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 4.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.110 Lydia 0 -0 0 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits at 04:36:27.74 +21:43:06.2: 16.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits at 04:36:27.74 +21:43:06.2: 16.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4096* 04 36 27.74 +21 43 06.2 13.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9096,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4096 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.4096* 04 10 01.52 +20 52 29.4 7.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9096,7.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4096 7.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
Last image: 2461247.90982995 26.07.2026 09:49:59.308 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.02
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 17029
Objects passed selection criteria: 16918
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10944
Average stars matched: 10665.2 (97.4529 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 242236 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 26 10:12:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
Last image: 2461247.90982995 26.07.2026 09:49:59.308 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 80
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.75
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 150 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 100926
Objects passed selection criteria: 100635
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 67946.5
Average stars matched: 65394 (96.2434 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2046400 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 26 10:24:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461247.90930920
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits'
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.001 +21:59:37.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Image size: 942.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:58.745 +21:57:17.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.001 +21:59:37.88
Second-epoch image center 04:36:58.745 +21:57:17.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0404 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:57.607 +21:57:40.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.001 +21:59:37.88
Second-epoch image center 04:36:57.607 +21:57:40.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0333 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:58.745 +21:57:17.48
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:57.607 +21:57:40.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00765 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lYD7TikaVi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VLae3ZFYfP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jspB6AyeFe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bwDBIVMAZe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 18007 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5123 to 78.0896 deg, Dec +16.4863 to +27.2831 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5123 to 78.0896 deg, Dec 16.4863 to 27.2831 deg
Loaded 5179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3828 out of 4342 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4342 out of 18007 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.972800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.972800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.02
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.95
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.95
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 18007 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5123 to 78.0896 deg, Dec +16.4863 to +27.2831 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5123 to 78.0896 deg, Dec 16.4863 to 27.2831 deg
Loaded 5179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3828 out of 4342 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4342 out of 18007 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 18074 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5127 to 78.0895 deg, Dec +16.4883 to +27.2833 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5127 to 78.0895 deg, Dec 16.4883 to 27.2833 deg
Loaded 5176 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3826 out of 4337 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4337 out of 18074 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
2.1 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
15.9 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lYD7TikaVi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1599, bad_region=0, passed=18007
Got 18007 stars (including 16378 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18007 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17547 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.215 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.234 n_q1=222 n_q2=222 n_q3=301 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VLae3ZFYfP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1577, bad_region=0, passed=18074
Got 18074 stars (including 16471 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18074 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17623 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17623 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.197 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.210 n_q1=223 n_q2=228 n_q3=297 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jspB6AyeFe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=188, bad_region=0, passed=3963
Got 3963 stars (including 3769 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3963 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013096 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010477 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=958 robust_rms=9.666 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=958 robust_rms=0.353 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=958 robust_rms_before=1.034 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.356 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.353 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.356 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=253 n_q2=213 n_q3=249 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.267
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bwDBIVMAZe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=191, bad_region=0, passed=4017
Got 4017 stars (including 3822 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4017 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=957 robust_rms=9.923 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=957 robust_rms=0.367 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=957 robust_rms_before=1.052 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.337 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.367 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.337 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=261 n_q2=210 n_q3=244 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.211
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits sigma_overall=0.262 worst_q_ratio=1.297
ref2=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits sigma_overall=0.251 worst_q_ratio=1.279
new1=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.267
new2=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits sigma_overall=0.361 worst_q_ratio=1.211
reference average sigma_overall=0.2565 worst_q_ratio=1.288
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367_astrometric_residuals.png (957 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21018_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 21018_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.77 +24:18:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21020_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
Preparing report for the candidate 21020_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.001 +21:59:37.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Image size: 942.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:58.745 +21:57:17.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.001 +21:59:37.88
Second-epoch image center 04:36:58.745 +21:57:17.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0404 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:57.607 +21:57:40.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.001 +21:59:37.88
Second-epoch image center 04:36:57.607 +21:57:40.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0333 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:58.745 +21:57:17.48
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:57.607 +21:57:40.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00765 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.89vPxykwVN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xjFls7iktW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KcVmr67BmB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bsCj1mYgRT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 110564 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5010 to 78.1091 deg, Dec +16.4682 to +27.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5010 to 78.1091 deg, Dec 16.4682 to 27.2864 deg
Loaded 5194 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3144 out of 4350 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4350 out of 110564 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.846800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.846800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.75
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.10
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.10
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 110564 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5010 to 78.1091 deg, Dec +16.4682 to +27.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5010 to 78.1091 deg, Dec 16.4682 to 27.2864 deg
Loaded 5194 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3144 out of 4350 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4350 out of 110564 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 110651 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5077 to 78.1091 deg, Dec +16.4813 to +27.2974 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5077 to 78.1091 deg, Dec 16.4813 to 27.2974 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3146 out of 4347 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4347 out of 110651 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 76 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
2.1 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
16.1 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
16.1 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.89vPxykwVN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=11354, bad_region=6, passed=110534
Got 110534 stars (including 98970 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 110534 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.193 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.209 n_q1=214 n_q2=229 n_q3=282 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xjFls7iktW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=11313, bad_region=6, passed=110625
Got 110625 stars (including 99128 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 110625 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 108053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 108051 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 108049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.186 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.219 n_q1=211 n_q2=228 n_q3=287 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.339
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KcVmr67BmB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=771, bad_region=5, passed=26089
Got 26089 stars (including 25280 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26089 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013096 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010477 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25565 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25565 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25556 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=258 n_q2=208 n_q3=252 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.243
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bsCj1mYgRT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=752, bad_region=8, passed=26347
Got 26347 stars (including 25554 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26347 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25799 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=262 n_q2=205 n_q3=248 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.228
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits at 05:09:08.02 +21:52:55.8: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits at 04:08:22.94 +26:42:01.1: 13.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits at 04:08:22.94 +26:42:01.1: 13.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits at 05:09:08.02 +21:52:55.8: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits at 04:21:45.28 +19:28:44.6: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:22.94 +26:42:01.1: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2538 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:08.02 +21:52:55.8: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3350 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits at 04:26:20.31 +22:46:08.0: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits at 04:18:20.83 +26:07:31.7: 16.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits at 04:21:45.28 +19:28:44.6: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:45.28 +19:28:44.6: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2011 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits at 04:26:20.31 +22:46:08.0: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:20.31 +22:46:08.0: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2028 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits at 04:18:20.83 +26:07:31.7: 16.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits at 04:48:48.82 +21:18:40.4: 12.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits at 04:48:48.82 +21:18:40.4: 12.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:48.82 +21:18:40.4: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5550 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits at 04:36:27.74 +21:43:06.2: 16.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits at 04:36:27.74 +21:43:06.2: 16.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits at 04:12:27.89 +23:33:01.7: 13.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits at 04:12:27.89 +23:33:01.7: 13.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:27.89 +23:33:01.7: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4179 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits at 04:24:12.18 +21:45:43.2: 14.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits at 04:24:12.18 +21:45:43.2: 14.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:12.18 +21:45:43.2: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7744 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130326.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130458.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130097_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130097_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130099_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130099_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:31.50 +22:04:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130101_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130101_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130102_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130102_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:07.99 +26:06:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130104_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130104_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:06.05 +22:54:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130105_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130105_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.77 +24:18:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130148_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130148_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:42.65 +23:02:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130152_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130152_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130156_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130156_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130161_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130161_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130164_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130164_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130170_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130170_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:23.68 +19:10:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130182_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130182_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130194_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130194_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130212_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130212_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130272_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130272_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130280_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130280_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130323_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130323_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:09.71 +22:55:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130326_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
Preparing report for the candidate 130326_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130330_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130330_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130340_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130340_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130343_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130343_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:38.41 +22:42:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130346_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130346_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:47.91 +18:26:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130350_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130350_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.87 +26:55:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130352_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130352_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:29.20 +22:48:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130355_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130355_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130393_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130393_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:11.69 +22:17:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130394_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130394_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130412_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130412_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:16.93 +23:48:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130415_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130415_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:50.28 +23:59:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130417_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130417_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:06.87 +23:48:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130423_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130423_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130432_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130432_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:47.26 +22:23:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130441_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130441_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.93 +26:25:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130450_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130450_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:30.12 +23:18:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130456_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130456_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:24.69 +22:56:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130458_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
Preparing report for the candidate 130458_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130469_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130469_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:18.09 +23:01:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130477_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130477_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130495_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130495_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:20.60 +22:10:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130513_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130513_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130530_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130530_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:40.49 +23:44:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130537_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130537_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:38.93 +23:58:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130541_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130541_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:07.11 +24:00:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130545_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130545_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130562_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130562_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130570_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130570_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130571_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130571_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:07.98 +21:31:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130583_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130583_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:32.74 +21:00:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130603_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130603_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:30.05 +21:45:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130624_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130624_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130626_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130626_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130640_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130640_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130642_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130642_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130666_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 130666_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07227_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 07227_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.07 +26:08:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46984_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 46984_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:42.90 +22:38:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74748_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 74748_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:47.03 +17:16:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92232_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 92232_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:18.26 +18:20:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45081_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 45081_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:21.51 +22:50:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127270_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
Preparing report for the candidate 127270_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47847_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 47847_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:48.18 +22:39:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67656_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 67656_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:39.90 +20:57:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47304_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 47304_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:31.91 +22:41:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59692_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 59692_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:42.94 +21:46:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90306_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 90306_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:45.96 +18:22:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20291_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20291_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:35.06 +25:01:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27483_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 27483_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:04.67 +24:13:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11339_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 11339_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:12.26 +25:58:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84403_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 84403_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:39.42 +17:51:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42078_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 42078_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:14.58 +22:57:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97883_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 97883_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:22.40 +18:50:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79323_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 79323_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:48.25 +20:25:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73834_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 73834_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:22.22 +17:09:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95139_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 95139_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:27.97 +18:38:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57702_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 57702_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks