NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Tau-03-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 26.40931    2461247.90931    7.16    04:10:01.49 +20:52:29.4   1020 2408   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    7.16    04:10:01.53 +20:52:29.2   1023 2404   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 26.4096  2461247.9096   7.16  04:10:01.51 +20:52:29.3
173.14423 -22.08368 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.8 pix   This object is listed in planets.txt   11.9"  Uranus (5.8mag)
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
11.9" Uranus  (5.8mag)
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Tau-03-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 26.40931    2461247.90931    12.71    04:18:20.83 +26:07:31.7   2121 5610   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.70    04:18:20.83 +26:07:31.6   2124 5607   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 26.4096  2461247.9096  12.71  04:18:20.83 +26:07:31.7
170.45000 -17.10683 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 4.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
63 Ausonia                  0     -0       0  12.6     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits at 04:18:20.83 +26:07:31.7:  16.47 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits at 04:18:20.83 +26:07:31.7:  16.49 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Tau-03-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 26.40931    2461247.90931    12.98    04:36:27.72 +21:43:05.6   4725 3049   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.04    04:36:27.75 +21:43:06.9   4728 3046   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 26.4096  2461247.9096  13.01  04:36:27.74 +21:43:06.2
176.76766 -16.89053 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 4.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
110 Lydia                    0     -0       0  13.4     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits at 04:36:27.74 +21:43:06.2:  16.77 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits at 04:36:27.74 +21:43:06.2:  16.80 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Tau-03-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 01 09.19035    2461049.69035    16.05    04:10:00.69 +20:52:47.7   8588 3840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40931    2461247.90931    7.25    04:10:01.51 +20:52:29.5   1020 2408   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Discovery image 3   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    7.25    04:10:01.53 +20:52:29.2   1023 2404   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 26.4096  2461247.9096   7.25  04:10:01.52 +20:52:29.4
173.14423 -22.08363 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 4.8 pix   This object is listed in planets.txt   12.0"  Uranus (5.8mag)
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
12.0" Uranus  (5.8mag)
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Tau-03-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 4

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 reference image: Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
Field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 reference image: Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
Field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Tau-03-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Tau-03-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Tau-03-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 250445 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 250445 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits_preview.png'
Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits

renamed 'Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits_preview.png'
Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 24.5772 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 612.8167 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1629.7756 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 492.7394 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1626.8919 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 494.4283 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 66.3125 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 24.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-26T04:49:14.3150969' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-26T09:49:14.3150969' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61247.4091934608 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-26T09:49:24.2188853' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61247.4093080787 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 69.2298146671749 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 21.9997608149311 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 19.9605555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 76.245 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.90757544987495 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-03' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 36 55' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+22 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 61.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 38.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 16.601328 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.200896 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/d_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits :) Spent 0.763781 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/d_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 24.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-26T04:49:59.3083960' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-26T09:49:59.3083960' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61247.4097142131 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-26T09:50:09.2127384' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61247.4098288426 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 69.2298145851282 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 21.9997608020255 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 20.1155555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 76.3377777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.88645773262571 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-03' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 36 55' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+22 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 61.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 38.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 16.601328 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.200896 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/d_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits :) Spent 0.762046 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/d_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits


fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461247.90930920 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits' wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits' wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits' wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:36:56.001 +21:59:37.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits Image size: 942.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:36:58.745 +21:57:17.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:36:56.001 +21:59:37.88 Second-epoch image center 04:36:58.745 +21:57:17.48 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0404 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:36:57.607 +21:57:40.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:36:56.001 +21:59:37.88 Second-epoch image center 04:36:57.607 +21:57:40.02 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0333 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:36:58.745 +21:57:17.48 Second-epoch second image center 04:36:57.607 +21:57:40.02 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00765 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lYD7TikaVi Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VLae3ZFYfP Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jspB6AyeFe Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bwDBIVMAZe Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 18007 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5123 to 78.0896 deg, Dec +16.4863 to +27.2831 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5123 to 78.0896 deg, Dec 16.4863 to 27.2831 deg Loaded 5179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3828 out of 4342 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4342 out of 18007 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.972800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.972800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.02 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.95 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.95
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 18007 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5123 to 78.0896 deg, Dec +16.4863 to +27.2831 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5123 to 78.0896 deg, Dec 16.4863 to 27.2831 deg Loaded 5179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3828 out of 4342 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4342 out of 18007 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 18074 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5127 to 78.0895 deg, Dec +16.4883 to +27.2833 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5127 to 78.0895 deg, Dec 16.4883 to 27.2833 deg Loaded 5176 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3826 out of 4337 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4337 out of 18074 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits (aperture=6.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits 2.1 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits 3.0 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits 3.0 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.9 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits 15.9 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits 13.7 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits 13.7 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.lYD7TikaVi (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits 860.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits' This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1599, bad_region=0, passed=18007 Got 18007 stars (including 16378 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18007 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17547 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17545 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17545 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.215 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.234 n_q1=222 n_q2=222 n_q3=301 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.VLae3ZFYfP (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits 860.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits' This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1577, bad_region=0, passed=18074 Got 18074 stars (including 16471 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18074 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17623 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17624 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17623 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.197 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.210 n_q1=223 n_q2=228 n_q3=297 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.jspB6AyeFe (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=188, bad_region=0, passed=3963 Got 3963 stars (including 3769 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3963 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013096 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010477 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3872 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3873 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3873 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=958 robust_rms=9.666 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=958 robust_rms=0.353 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=958 robust_rms_before=1.034 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.356 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.353 arcsec SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.356 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=253 n_q2=213 n_q3=249 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.267 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.bwDBIVMAZe (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=191, bad_region=0, passed=4017 Got 4017 stars (including 3822 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4017 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3936 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3933 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3932 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1053) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=957 robust_rms=9.923 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=957 robust_rms=0.367 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=957 robust_rms_before=1.052 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.337 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.367 arcsec SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.337 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=261 n_q2=210 n_q3=244 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.211 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits sigma_overall=0.262 worst_q_ratio=1.297 ref2=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits sigma_overall=0.251 worst_q_ratio=1.279 new1=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.267 new2=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits sigma_overall=0.361 worst_q_ratio=1.211 reference average sigma_overall=0.2565 worst_q_ratio=1.288 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367_astrometric_residuals.png (957 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21018_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 21018_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    8.43    04:23:57.77 +24:18:13.4   2928 4523   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:23:57.77 +24:18:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21020_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 Preparing report for the candidate 21020_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:36:56.001 +21:59:37.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits Image size: 942.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:36:58.745 +21:57:17.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:36:56.001 +21:59:37.88 Second-epoch image center 04:36:58.745 +21:57:17.48 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0404 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:36:57.607 +21:57:40.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:36:56.001 +21:59:37.88 Second-epoch image center 04:36:57.607 +21:57:40.02 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0333 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:36:58.745 +21:57:17.48 Second-epoch second image center 04:36:57.607 +21:57:40.02 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00765 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.89vPxykwVN Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xjFls7iktW Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KcVmr67BmB Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bsCj1mYgRT Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 110564 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5010 to 78.1091 deg, Dec +16.4682 to +27.2864 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5010 to 78.1091 deg, Dec 16.4682 to 27.2864 deg Loaded 5194 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3144 out of 4350 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4350 out of 110564 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.846800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.846800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.75 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.10 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.10
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 110564 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5010 to 78.1091 deg, Dec +16.4682 to +27.2864 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5010 to 78.1091 deg, Dec 16.4682 to 27.2864 deg Loaded 5194 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3144 out of 4350 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4350 out of 110564 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 110651 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5077 to 78.1091 deg, Dec +16.4813 to +27.2974 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5077 to 78.1091 deg, Dec 16.4813 to 27.2974 deg Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3146 out of 4347 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4347 out of 110651 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits (aperture=4.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 76 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits 2.1 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits 2.7 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits 2.7 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 16.1 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits 16.1 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits 13.9 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits 13.9 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.89vPxykwVN (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits 860.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits' This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=11354, bad_region=6, passed=110534 Got 110534 stars (including 98970 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 110534 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107589 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107589 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107589 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.193 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.209 n_q1=214 n_q2=229 n_q3=282 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.xjFls7iktW (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits 860.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits' This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=11313, bad_region=6, passed=110625 Got 110625 stars (including 99128 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 110625 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 108053 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 108051 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 108049 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.186 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.219 n_q1=211 n_q2=228 n_q3=287 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.339 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.KcVmr67BmB (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=771, bad_region=5, passed=26089 Got 26089 stars (including 25280 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26089 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013096 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010477 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25565 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25565 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25556 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1057) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=258 n_q2=208 n_q3=252 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.243 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.bsCj1mYgRT (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=752, bad_region=8, passed=26347 Got 26347 stars (including 25554 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26347 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25809 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25808 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25799 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1053) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=262 n_q2=205 n_q3=248 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.228 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits at 05:09:08.02 +21:52:55.8: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits at 04:08:22.94 +26:42:01.1: 13.24 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits at 04:08:22.94 +26:42:01.1: 13.28 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits at 05:09:08.02 +21:52:55.8: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits at 04:21:45.28 +19:28:44.6: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:22.94 +26:42:01.1: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2538 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:08.02 +21:52:55.8: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3350 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits at 04:26:20.31 +22:46:08.0: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits at 04:18:20.83 +26:07:31.7: 16.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits at 04:21:45.28 +19:28:44.6: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:45.28 +19:28:44.6: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2011 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits at 04:26:20.31 +22:46:08.0: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:20.31 +22:46:08.0: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2028 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits at 04:18:20.83 +26:07:31.7: 16.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits at 04:48:48.82 +21:18:40.4: 12.72 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits at 04:48:48.82 +21:18:40.4: 12.72 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:48.82 +21:18:40.4: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5550 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits at 04:36:27.74 +21:43:06.2: 16.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits at 04:36:27.74 +21:43:06.2: 16.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits at 04:12:27.89 +23:33:01.7: 13.69 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits at 04:12:27.89 +23:33:01.7: 13.64 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:27.89 +23:33:01.7: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4179 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_stack2.fits at 04:24:12.18 +21:45:43.2: 14.04 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_stack2.fits at 04:24:12.18 +21:45:43.2: 14.07 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:12.18 +21:45:43.2: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7744 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130326.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130458.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130097_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130097_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 26.40931    2461247.90931    13.25    04:08:22.94 +26:42:01.3   0750 5949   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.26    04:08:22.95 +26:42:01.0   0753 5945   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130099_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130099_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.16    04:06:31.57 +22:04:44.7   0518 3130   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:06:31.50 +22:04:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130101_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130101_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 26.40931    2461247.90931    12.34    05:09:07.96 +21:52:56.6   9292 3529   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.33    05:09:08.08 +21:52:55.0   9296 3525   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130102_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130102_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.60    04:23:08.01 +26:06:10.6   2776 5609   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:23:07.99 +26:06:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130104_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130104_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    10.44    04:26:06.03 +22:54:24.0   3254 3691   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:26:06.05 +22:54:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130105_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130105_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    8.44    04:23:57.77 +24:18:13.5   2928 4523   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:23:57.77 +24:18:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130148_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130148_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    10.46    05:09:42.64 +23:02:03.3   9302 4231   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 05:09:42.65 +23:02:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130152_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130152_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    11.05    04:25:06.27 +24:23:08.7   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130156_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130156_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    11.18    04:28:12.84 +26:41:26.5   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130161_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130161_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    10.85    04:41:45.24 +19:27:49.4   5551 1735   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130164_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130164_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    11.18    04:11:09.52 +19:26:22.2   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130170_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130170_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    11.12    04:28:23.68 +19:10:47.0   3666 1460   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:28:23.68 +19:10:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130182_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130182_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    11.52    04:10:16.42 +20:14:54.8   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130194_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130194_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    11.46    04:28:02.84 +18:02:12.4   3644 0767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130212_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130212_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    11.80    04:36:02.07 +27:02:02.4   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130272_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130272_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 26.40931    2461247.90931    12.23    04:26:20.30 +22:46:07.8   3288 3613   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.18    04:26:20.31 +22:46:08.2   3290 3610   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130280_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130280_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 26.40931    2461247.90931    12.23    04:21:45.30 +19:28:44.5   2711 1606   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.17    04:21:45.26 +19:28:44.7   2714 1603   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130323_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130323_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.50    04:42:09.70 +22:55:09.2   5476 3815   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:42:09.71 +22:55:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130326_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 Preparing report for the candidate 130326_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130330_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130330_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.74    04:13:25.20 +25:55:20.1   1452 5473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130340_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130340_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.46    04:28:45.48 +18:40:13.0   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130343_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130343_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.55    04:34:38.43 +22:42:12.3   4443 3623   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:34:38.41 +22:42:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130346_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130346_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.74    04:10:47.93 +18:26:17.8   1151 0926   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:10:47.91 +18:26:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130350_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130350_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.60    04:38:26.86 +26:55:00.1   4822 6194   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:38:26.87 +26:55:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130352_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130352_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.54    04:26:29.23 +22:48:44.8   3310 3637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:26:29.20 +22:48:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130355_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130355_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.61    04:39:18.57 +24:48:10.6   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130393_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130393_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.67    04:25:11.70 +22:17:34.3   3142 3317   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:25:11.69 +22:17:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130394_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130394_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 26.40931    2461247.90931    12.56    04:48:48.81 +21:18:40.4   6465 2919   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.55    04:48:48.83 +21:18:40.3   6468 2915   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130412_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130412_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.19    04:05:16.91 +23:48:47.6   0336 4184   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:05:16.93 +23:48:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130415_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130415_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.55    04:57:50.27 +23:59:20.5   7590 4633   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:57:50.28 +23:59:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130417_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130417_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.52    05:05:06.87 +23:48:48.8   8609 4630   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 05:05:06.87 +23:48:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130423_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130423_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.85    04:30:27.75 +25:00:30.8   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130432_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130432_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.96    04:12:47.28 +22:23:14.3   1403 3327   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:12:47.26 +22:23:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130441_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130441_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.67    05:05:45.99 +26:25:46.5   8540 6226   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 05:05:45.93 +26:25:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130450_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130450_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.95    04:36:30.13 +23:18:39.5   4681 4002   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:36:30.12 +23:18:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130456_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130456_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.89    04:42:24.70 +22:56:41.7   5509 3833   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:42:24.69 +22:56:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130458_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 Preparing report for the candidate 130458_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130469_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130469_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.10    04:27:18.12 +23:01:28.7   3418 3769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:27:18.09 +23:01:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130477_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130477_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.14    04:16:51.22 +18:31:44.2   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130495_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130495_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.24    04:25:20.60 +22:10:32.4   3165 3247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:25:20.60 +22:10:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130513_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130513_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.99    04:30:29.78 +20:26:44.2   3930 2237   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130530_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130530_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.28    04:19:40.50 +23:44:18.0   2347 4164   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:19:40.49 +23:44:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130537_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130537_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.20    04:32:38.86 +23:58:24.0   4130 4373   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:32:38.93 +23:58:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130541_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130541_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.28    04:19:07.11 +24:00:35.0   2265 4326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:19:07.11 +24:00:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130545_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130545_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.27    04:09:27.47 +21:02:45.2   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130562_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130562_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 26.40931    2461247.90931    13.51    04:12:27.87 +23:33:00.9   1343 4035   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.35    04:12:27.91 +23:33:02.5   1346 4031   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130570_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130570_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.91    04:04:41.85 +24:45:47.6   0251 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130571_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130571_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.19    04:36:07.87 +21:31:44.5   4688 2929   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:36:07.98 +21:31:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130583_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130583_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.21    04:21:32.77 +21:00:56.1   2656 2529   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:21:32.74 +21:00:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130603_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130603_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.54    04:19:30.07 +21:45:13.7   2355 2966   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:19:30.05 +21:45:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130624_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130624_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.29    04:34:59.81 +16:56:10.5   4674 0150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130626_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130626_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.58    04:32:42.69 +19:45:32.1   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130640_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130640_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    14.08    04:08:57.90 +18:33:53.2   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130642_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130642_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.95    04:05:19.79 +24:17:38.9   0341 4477   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 130666_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 130666_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 26.40931    2461247.90931    13.91    04:24:12.11 +21:45:44.8   3012 2996   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.69    04:24:12.25 +21:45:41.5   3015 2992   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07227_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 07227_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    11.39    05:09:07.11 +26:08:17.0   9018 6103   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 05:09:07.07 +26:08:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 46984_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 46984_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    10.50    04:40:42.89 +22:38:12.2   5286 3632   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:40:42.90 +22:38:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 74748_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 74748_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.60    04:52:47.00 +17:16:30.8   7224 0525   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:52:47.03 +17:16:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 92232_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 92232_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.55    05:02:18.23 +18:20:25.3   8539 1286   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 05:02:18.26 +18:20:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 45081_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 45081_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    11.90    04:44:21.52 +22:50:09.6   5783 3786   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:44:21.51 +22:50:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 127270_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 Preparing report for the candidate 127270_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 47847_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 47847_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.79    04:32:48.21 +22:39:56.4   4190 3587   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:32:48.18 +22:39:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67656_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 67656_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.02    04:58:39.86 +20:57:06.6   7870 2815   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:58:39.90 +20:57:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 47304_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 47304_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.50    04:46:31.92 +22:41:08.2   6090 3717   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:46:31.91 +22:41:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 59692_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 59692_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    12.05    04:34:42.92 +21:46:22.0   4482 3065   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:34:42.94 +21:46:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90306_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 90306_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.69    04:17:46.04 +18:22:38.2   2160 0916   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:17:45.96 +18:22:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20291_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 20291_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.24    04:44:35.16 +25:01:11.2   5725 5102   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:44:35.06 +25:01:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 27483_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 27483_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.04    04:56:04.63 +24:13:16.4   7335 4750   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:56:04.67 +24:13:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 11339_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 11339_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.26    04:51:12.19 +25:58:30.0   6582 5750   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:51:12.26 +25:58:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84403_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 84403_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    13.15    04:33:39.48 +17:51:50.9   4453 0702   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:33:39.42 +17:51:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 42078_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 42078_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    7.05    04:42:14.56 +22:57:19.5   5485 3838   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:42:14.58 +22:57:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 97883_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 97883_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    6.71    04:51:22.40 +18:50:23.7   6945 1456   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:51:22.40 +18:50:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79323_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 79323_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    6.72    05:07:48.23 +20:25:04.5   9201 2620   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 05:07:48.25 +20:25:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 73834_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 73834_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    6.56    04:57:22.23 +17:09:12.6   7894 0504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 04:57:22.22 +17:09:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95139_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 95139_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    6.51    05:07:28.00 +18:38:42.5   9267 1542   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 05:07:27.97 +18:38:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57702_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 The candidate 57702_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 26.40983    2461247.90983    6.62    05:03:05.65 +21:35:21.5   8459 3259   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_045718_TTUQ1b1x1_2569782_THdQufHK/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits **** FOUND 05:03:05.65 +21:35:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 15s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 04:18:20.83 +26:07:31.7 04:36:27.74 +21:43:06.2 ########### Completed Tau-03-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 04:10:01.51 +20:52:29.3 04:18:20.83 +26:07:31.7 04:36:27.74 +21:43:06.2 04:10:01.52 +20:52:29.4 ################################################################################### 04:10:01.51 +20:52:29.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 04:18:20.83 +26:07:31.7 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 04:36:27.74 +21:43:06.2 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 04:10:01.52 +20:52:29.4 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461247.90930920 -observatory V36 07:08:38.30 +18:56:11.0 Mercury (1.4mag) 11:15:51.04 +05:12:46.6 Venus (-4.2mag) 05:11:42.76 +22:59:22.5 Mars (1.3mag) 08:31:19.16 +19:23:01.9 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:48.80 +03:21:39.2 Saturn (0.7mag) 04:10:00.67 +20:52:27.8 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:42.04 +00:17:41.4 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:29:23.05 -23:24:59.5 Pluto (14.4mag) 17:46:09.32 -28:30:26.9 Moon (-11.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul 26 10:12 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461247.90930920: 08:31:26.76 +19:22:32.1 Io (6.0mag) 08:31:18.06 +19:23:06.5 Europa (6.3mag) 08:31:25.97 +19:22:31.6 Ganymede (5.5mag) 08:31:48.64 +19:21:04.2 Callisto (6.7mag) 08:29:12.10 +19:14:57.5 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:31:17.48 +19:23:09.7 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:28:36.06 +19:16:01.7 Elara (17.7mag) 08:35:15.82 +19:08:46.8 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:35:19.53 +19:30:43.7 Carme (19.0mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 365 Jul 26 10:15 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461247.90930920: 18:18:25.87 -28:29:01.0 JWST 16:41:11.72 +44:33:39.1 Chandra 06:00:07.05 +31:13:59.1 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 26 10:13 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461247.90930920 -observatory V36 02:58:07.32 +16:11:49.5 17.8mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:07:09.33 -34:38:07.6 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:41:34.22 -68:29:08.0 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:06:07.51 +32:44:08.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 03:01:20.44 +29:48:26.0 16.2mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:48:43.92 +32:02:07.5 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:30:13.34 +26:44:34.6 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:09:48.56 +29:03:08.4 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:20:16.92 +05:13:39.6 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:11:06.58 -11:49:41.1 17.8mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:28:15.45 +67:06:50.4 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 16:03:22.99 -11:42:36.2 14.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:29:36.58 +66:38:33.3 18.0mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:53:07.46 +30:46:16.2 15.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:09:56.29 +15:35:38.7 17.6mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:20:01.26 +41:57:18.2 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:28:43.42 +48:06:48.9 17.7mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:04:20.43 -13:12:49.5 15.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:47:16.16 +26:22:18.1 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:24:30.65 -14:30:59.7 17.2mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:15:43.53 +21:39:33.1 17.5mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:51:09.89 +03:08:27.3 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:14:45.06 +78:48:48.0 17.1mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:00:37.42 +45:51:05.4 16.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:36:40.36 +07:01:38.6 17.1mag A/2026 E1 21:42:36.47 -21:38:42.3 6.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:21:36.48 -02:39:33.1 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:22:39.30 +31:13:26.2 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:41:25.41 +08:49:55.3 17.1mag 63P/Wild 00:53:24.96 -05:06:51.0 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 05:05:50.98 +20:43:16.8 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 02:46:00.08 +12:33:26.7 16.5mag 88P/Howell 07:21:47.54 +29:12:53.6 15.9mag 93P/Lovas 03:31:31.83 +11:58:15.3 18.0mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 05:13:53.10 +31:12:52.8 16.5mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 08:47:47.50 +28:39:43.0 15.1mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:18:34.64 -05:16:03.0 17.0mag 124P/Mrkos 05:17:08.52 +21:08:10.7 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:05:58.04 +19:24:39.0 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 08:08:10.09 +13:21:01.1 17.5mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:21:21.57 -19:51:10.1 16.9mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 06:30:57.08 +36:41:25.6 15.6mag 162P/SidingSpring 17:55:06.78 +27:51:19.9 13.3mag 169P/NEAT 02:17:32.11 +09:01:08.8 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:36:42.25 -09:12:48.0 17.4mag 235P/LINEAR 20:32:00.08 -52:15:58.6 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 02:44:54.17 +19:32:05.4 15.5mag 260P/McNaught 06:26:18.96 +37:42:19.5 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:07:23.57 +04:30:37.7 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski 08:49:10.22 +18:59:03.7 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 08:16:35.94 +37:51:15.9 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Jul 26 10:12 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-26eg 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 26 10:12 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 26 10:12 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 22:57:07.931 -11:29:20.40 AT 2026uaw 2026-06-27.41 22.9246 23:00:56.681 -02:58:01.46 AT 2026uav 2026-06-27.40 22.3003 21:41:28.556 -10:15:02.03 AT 2026uau 2026-06-27.33 22.5499 23:36:00.567 +03:08:40.99 AT 2026uat 2026-06-27.40 22.3861 22:51:17.819 -02:44:30.07 AT 2026uas 2026-06-27.43 23.6131 22:43:31.162 -13:04:19.53 AT 2026uar 2026-06-27.41 23.404 22:56:11.772 -15:33:00.49 AT 2026uaq 2026-06-27.41 22.9473 00:34:21.041 -43:24:58.27 AT 2026uap 2026-06-26.42 23.5619 18:13:13.910 +08:19:45.95 AT 2026uao 2026-07-12.25 19.6718 15:59:20.050 +31:57:53.76 AT 2026uan 2026-07-03.75 20.59 16:18:19.991 +31:46:16.25 AT 2026uam 2026-07-03.75 21.58 15:46:15.870 +52:34:46.97 AT 2026ual 2026-07-03.73 21.47 15:47:43.770 +56:00:26.98 AT 2026uak 2026-07-03.72 21.4 16:16:42.449 +22:13:18.43 AT 2026uaj 2026-07-03.68 20.61 23:55:42.693 +34:28:37.99 AT 2026uai 2026-07-02.77 20.43 14:33:38.730 +31:20:49.35 AT 2026uah 2026-06-30.67 21.31 16:20:08.450 +15:55:00.65 AT 2026uag 2026-06-24.78 21.81 23:49:07.700 +34:00:30.50 AT 2026uaf 2026-06-11.84 20.33 13:48:41.440 +00:58:56.34 AT 2026uae 2026-07-09.63 22.3 13:45:12.450 -01:04:07.83 AT 2026uad 2026-07-09.63 22.39 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Jul 26 10:12 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 90 C