This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.3971* 04 10 01.23 +20 52 30.0 6.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.8971,6.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.3971 6.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.3971* 04 10 01.22 +20 52 30.0 6.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.8971,6.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.3971 6.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.3971 2461247.8971 12.05 03:43:44.69 +23:27:03.9
166.45436 -24.51427 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis -0 -1 1 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:43:44.69 +23:27:03.9: 16.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:43:44.69 +23:27:03.9: 16.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.3971* 03 43 44.69 +23 27 03.9 12.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.8971,12.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.3971 12.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.3971 2461247.8971 12.81 03:37:27.65 +22:14:07.0
166.14732 -26.38437 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 0.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales -0 -1 1 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:37:27.65 +22:14:07.0: 16.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:37:27.65 +22:14:07.0: 16.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.3971* 03 37 27.65 +22 14 07.0 12.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.8971,12.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.3971 12.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.3971 2461247.8971 14.12 03:14:48.57 +20:16:02.3
162.91484 -31.25361 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.1" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 03:14:48.57 +20:16:02.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:14:48.57 +20:16:02.3: 16.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:14:48.57 +20:16:02.3: 16.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.3971* 03 14 48.57 +20 16 02.3 14.1 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461247.8971,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260726.3971 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.3971 2461247.8971 13.96 03:51:17.63 +23:26:05.8
167.86120 -23.35459 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula 0 -1 1 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:51:17.63 +23:26:05.8: 16.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:51:17.63 +23:26:05.8: 16.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.3971* 03 51 17.63 +23 26 05.8 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.8971,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.3971 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.3971 2461247.8971 13.91 03:20:59.38 +18:44:53.5
165.35771 -31.53743 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.83 Beatrix -2 1 2 14.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:20:59.38 +18:44:53.5: 16.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:20:59.38 +18:44:53.5: 16.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.3971* 03 20 59.38 +18 44 53.5 13.9 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.8971,13.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.3971 13.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Last image: 2461247.89733171 26.07.2026 09:31:59.460 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.05
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15854
Objects passed selection criteria: 15774
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11118.8
Average stars matched: 10890.2 (97.9449 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 241072 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 26 10:44:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Last image: 2461247.89733171 26.07.2026 09:31:59.460 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 111
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.78
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 81 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 82410
Objects passed selection criteria: 82146
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 59479.8
Average stars matched: 57590.5 (96.8237 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2044436 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 26 10:53:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461247.89685562
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits'
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:29.196 +21:58:49.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:29.196 +21:58:49.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0237 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:29.627 +21:58:47.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:29.627 +21:58:47.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0229 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:29.196 +21:58:49.06
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:29.627 +21:58:47.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00171 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DRgjjO3E23
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4fmbKxqYgW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4T6AfPztnH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits &> /tmp/tmp.U2BBP8hWBp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16676 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.4784 to +27.2944 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.4784 to 27.2944 deg
Loaded 6147 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4732 out of 5194 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5194 out of 16676 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.916900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.916900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.05
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.87
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.87
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16676 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.4784 to +27.2944 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.4784 to 27.2944 deg
Loaded 6147 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4732 out of 5194 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5194 out of 16676 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 16620 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6517 to 64.2526 deg, Dec +16.4784 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6517 to 64.2526 deg, Dec 16.4784 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4726 out of 5194 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5194 out of 16620 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
2.1 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
15.9 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DRgjjO3E23 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1342, bad_region=0, passed=16676
Got 16676 stars (including 15307 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16676 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16399 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16400 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16400 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.230 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.197 n_q1=282 n_q2=271 n_q3=184 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4fmbKxqYgW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1357, bad_region=0, passed=16620
Got 16620 stars (including 15249 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16620 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.225 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.202 n_q1=282 n_q2=272 n_q3=187 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4T6AfPztnH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=228, bad_region=0, passed=5696
Got 5696 stars (including 5465 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5696 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=963 robust_rms=7.340 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=963 robust_rms=0.357 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=963 robust_rms_before=1.116 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.362 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.357 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.362 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.367 n_q1=228 n_q2=159 n_q3=272 n_q4=304 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.052
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.U2BBP8hWBp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=231, bad_region=0, passed=5696
Got 5696 stars (including 5463 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5696 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5575 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5575 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5576 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=964 robust_rms=7.716 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=964 robust_rms=0.361 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=964 robust_rms_before=1.116 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.360 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.361 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.360 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=226 n_q2=161 n_q3=271 n_q4=306 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits sigma_overall=0.249 worst_q_ratio=1.303
ref2=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits sigma_overall=0.261 worst_q_ratio=1.171
new1=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.052
new2=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits sigma_overall=0.353 worst_q_ratio=1.242
reference average sigma_overall=0.255 worst_q_ratio=1.237
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349_astrometric_residuals.png (964 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20795_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
Preparing report for the candidate 20795_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20855_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 20855_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.56 +24:42:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20872_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 20872_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:23.17 +24:32:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20880_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 20880_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:04.27 +25:32:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10471_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 10471_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:39.38 +21:03:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:29.196 +21:58:49.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:29.196 +21:58:49.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0237 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:29.627 +21:58:47.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:29.627 +21:58:47.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0229 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:29.196 +21:58:49.06
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:29.627 +21:58:47.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00171 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nIWHjpw6qh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FlctuX4PEs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yAIFed4jBA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits &> /tmp/tmp.REiXm2vCIs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 88883 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6567 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.4784 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6567 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.4784 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4048 out of 5195 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5195 out of 88883 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.811200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.811200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.78
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.03
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.03
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 88883 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6567 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.4784 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6567 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.4784 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4048 out of 5195 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5195 out of 88883 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 89152 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6517 to 64.2526 deg, Dec +16.4684 to +27.2928 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6517 to 64.2526 deg, Dec 16.4684 to 27.2928 deg
Loaded 6156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4023 out of 5194 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5194 out of 89152 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 106 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
2.1 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
16.0 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
16.0 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nIWHjpw6qh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=7709, bad_region=6, passed=88848
Got 88848 stars (including 81003 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88848 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87431 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.237 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.194 n_q1=275 n_q2=261 n_q3=193 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FlctuX4PEs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=39, blended=7668, bad_region=7, passed=89113
Got 89113 stars (including 81303 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 89113 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87821 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.202 n_q1=274 n_q2=267 n_q3=197 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yAIFed4jBA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1044, bad_region=5, passed=30713
Got 30713 stars (including 29630 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30713 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30003 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=231 n_q2=159 n_q3=279 n_q4=294 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.041
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.REiXm2vCIs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1014, bad_region=9, passed=30750
Got 30750 stars (including 29691 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30750 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30000 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29999 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30000 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.358 n_q1=234 n_q2=159 n_q3=277 n_q4=293 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_045510_TTUQ1b1x1_2542868_25bVNFXh/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 04:12:20.93 +16:42:08.8: 12.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:40:32.85 +27:03:09.7: 12.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:40:38.92 +26:40:35.7: 13.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:19:11.73 +23:29:08.5: 13.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:15:47.26 +21:11:23.6: 13.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 04:12:20.93 +16:42:08.8: 12.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:20.93 +16:42:08.8: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9646 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:40:32.85 +27:03:09.7: 12.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:32.85 +27:03:09.7: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9430 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:19:11.73 +23:29:08.5: 13.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:40:38.92 +26:40:35.7: 13.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:38.92 +26:40:35.7: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3712 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:19:11.73 +23:29:08.5: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1764 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:15:47.26 +21:11:23.6: 13.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:15:47.26 +21:11:23.6: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6852 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:43:44.69 +23:27:03.9: 16.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:48:54.46 +23:50:00.6: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:42:21.40 +19:39:45.9: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:50:34.62 +24:30:26.0: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:43:44.69 +23:27:03.9: 16.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:48:54.46 +23:50:00.6: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:54.46 +23:50:00.6: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3030 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:42:21.40 +19:39:45.9: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:50:34.62 +24:30:26.0: 12.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:21.40 +19:39:45.9: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3613 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:34.62 +24:30:26.0: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4731 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:51:30.81 +25:08:23.3: 12.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:39:54.74 +25:11:44.6: 12.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 04:16:44.81 +26:19:49.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:51:30.81 +25:08:23.3: 12.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:39:54.74 +25:11:44.6: 12.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:30.81 +25:08:23.3: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6672 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:54.74 +25:11:44.6: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7708 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:37:27.65 +22:14:07.0: 16.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:59:07.51 +23:38:23.7: 12.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 04:16:44.81 +26:19:49.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:44.81 +26:19:49.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:37:27.65 +22:14:07.0: 16.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:59:07.51 +23:38:23.7: 12.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:07.51 +23:38:23.7: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6868 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:56:01.87 +20:46:40.7: 12.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:34:24.18 +22:45:54.2: 13.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:56:01.87 +20:46:40.7: 12.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:42:50.23 +24:29:28.5: 13.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:01.87 +20:46:40.7: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8875 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:23:05.76 +26:52:34.9: 13.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:36:51.47 +23:11:58.0: 13.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:34:24.18 +22:45:54.2: 13.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:24.18 +22:45:54.2: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2515 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:42:50.23 +24:29:28.5: 13.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:50.23 +24:29:28.5: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2378 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:39:09.98 +24:43:28.2: 13.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:23:05.76 +26:52:34.9: 13.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:05.76 +26:52:34.9: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5441 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:36:51.47 +23:11:58.0: 13.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:36:51.47 +23:11:58.0: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2740 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:39:09.98 +24:43:28.2: 13.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:09.98 +24:43:28.2: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2792 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:50:31.53 +24:31:43.7: 13.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:50:31.53 +24:31:43.7: 13.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:31.53 +24:31:43.7: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1167 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:49:42.91 +21:10:21.6: 13.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:10:19.95 +24:10:10.3: 13.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:49:42.91 +21:10:21.6: 13.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:42.91 +21:10:21.6: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1843 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:10:19.95 +24:10:10.3: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:59:08.36 +23:38:39.4: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:19.95 +24:10:10.3: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7067 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:26:59.10 +26:42:29.1: 13.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:26:59.10 +26:42:29.1: 13.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:45:42.04 +24:55:07.9: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:59.10 +26:42:29.1: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5684 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:59:08.36 +23:38:39.4: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:08.36 +23:38:39.4: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2635 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:45:42.04 +24:55:07.9: 13.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:42.04 +24:55:07.9: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5270 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:51:23.48 +24:31:33.2: 13.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:31:18.59 +17:58:03.5: 13.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:49:20.74 +24:15:55.0: 13.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:29:32.06 +26:24:38.2: 13.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:51:23.48 +24:31:33.2: 13.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:23.48 +24:31:33.2: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5273 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:49:20.74 +24:15:55.0: 13.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:31:18.59 +17:58:03.5: 13.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:18.59 +17:58:03.5: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5153 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:20.74 +24:15:55.0: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6554 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:29:32.06 +26:24:38.2: 13.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:32.06 +26:24:38.2: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8592 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:58:14.76 +24:04:19.5: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:17:57.59 +21:36:12.7: 13.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:51:17.63 +23:26:05.8: 16.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:58:14.76 +24:04:19.5: 13.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:14.76 +24:04:19.5: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5866 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:14:48.57 +20:16:02.3: 16.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:17:57.59 +21:36:12.7: 13.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:57.59 +21:36:12.7: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7674 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:42:27.22 +26:32:25.7: 13.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:51:17.63 +23:26:05.8: 16.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:14:48.57 +20:16:02.3: 16.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:20:59.38 +18:44:53.5: 16.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:42:27.22 +26:32:25.7: 13.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:27.22 +26:32:25.7: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9845 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:20:59.38 +18:44:53.5: 16.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:46:34.96 +22:56:06.9: 14.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:46:34.96 +22:56:06.9: 14.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:34.96 +22:56:06.9: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0409 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:41:27.47 +23:29:33.1: 14.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:41:27.47 +23:29:33.1: 14.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:41:27.47 +23:29:33.1: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0715 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out105852.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out105986.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out106297.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out106302.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out106311.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 24s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105705_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105705_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105708_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105708_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105709_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105709_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105710_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105710_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105712_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105712_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105715_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
Preparing report for the candidate 105715_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105776_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105776_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105777_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105777_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.58 +24:42:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105786_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105786_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105788_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105788_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105793_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105793_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105801_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105801_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105810_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105810_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:04.24 +25:32:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105824_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105824_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105828_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105828_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105850_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105850_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105852_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
Preparing report for the candidate 105852_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105894_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105894_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105905_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105905_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105913_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105913_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:20.78 +24:28:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105918_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105918_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105931_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105931_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105932_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105932_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:59.91 +26:28:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105950_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105950_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:20.06 +24:01:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105955_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105955_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:07.52 +24:00:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105956_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105956_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105958_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105958_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105960_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105960_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105968_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105968_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105976_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105976_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105986_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
Preparing report for the candidate 105986_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105997_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105997_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:28.83 +22:02:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105998_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105998_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106003_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106003_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:27:02.55 +24:51:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106007_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106007_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106012_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106012_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106024_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106024_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:22.93 +26:10:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106038_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106038_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:15.30 +23:59:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106041_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106041_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106055_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106055_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:10:44.93 +21:52:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106063_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106063_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:40.54 +23:40:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106073_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106073_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:08:10.32 +23:44:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106079_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106079_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106080_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106080_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:47.86 +18:26:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106087_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106087_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106096_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106096_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106097_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106097_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106101_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106101_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:56.20 +23:09:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106103_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106103_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106104_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106104_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106105_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106105_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:11.58 +25:33:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106107_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106107_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106114_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106114_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:32:26.24 +17:35:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106120_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106120_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:42.95 +18:12:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106125_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106125_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:12.52 +26:34:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106129_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106129_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:27.92 +20:49:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106132_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106132_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:16.85 +23:48:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106133_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106133_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:01.12 +24:05:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106138_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106138_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:55.26 +24:15:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106143_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106143_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106147_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106147_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106149_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106149_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106150_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106150_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:18:15.20 +24:03:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106155_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106155_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:04.10 +24:10:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106156_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106156_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:26.55 +25:41:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106157_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106157_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106163_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106163_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106167_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106167_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:11.34 +25:53:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106168_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106168_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:47.20 +22:23:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106183_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106183_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106191_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106191_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106198_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106198_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106199_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106199_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:44.58 +20:24:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106202_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106202_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106203_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106203_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:20.64 +24:45:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106227_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106227_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106235_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106235_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106243_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106243_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106258_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106258_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:42.06 +26:21:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106263_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106263_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106267_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106267_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106273_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106273_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106275_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106275_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106282_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106282_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106297_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
Preparing report for the candidate 106297_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106299_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106299_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106301_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106301_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106302_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
Preparing report for the candidate 106302_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106304_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106304_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:02.12 +23:53:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106311_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
Preparing report for the candidate 106311_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106324_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106324_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106334_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106334_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106339_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 106339_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74861_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 74861_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68372_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 68372_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:04.21 +18:19:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87707_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 87707_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60034_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 60034_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79761_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 79761_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:48.27 +19:41:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50082_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 50082_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55689_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 55689_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:39.38 +21:03:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75994_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 75994_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36963_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 36963_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63455_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 63455_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:31.43 +17:16:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63487_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 63487_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:59.31 +17:20:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80967_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 80967_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:10.03 +19:36:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46367_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 46367_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-31-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
