This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.3793 2461247.8793 13.88 02:01:37.83 +28:03:45.5
141.27784 -32.29623 galactic Tri Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.686 Gersuind -1 -2 2 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:01:37.83 +28:03:45.5: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:01:37.83 +28:03:45.5: 16.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.3793* 02 01 37.83 +28 03 45.5 13.9 U Tri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.8793,13.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.3793 13.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.3793* 02 19 17.35 +28 57 15.2 14.1 U Tri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461247.8793,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260726.3793 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.3793 2461247.8793 14.55 01:41:28.34 +29:22:23.9
135.82623 -32.24258 galactic Tri Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1467 Mashona -2 -0 2 14.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:41:28.34 +29:22:23.9: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:41:28.34 +29:22:23.9: 16.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.3793* 01 41 28.34 +29 22 23.9 14.6 U Tri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.8793,14.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.3793 14.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.65440406 09.01.2026 03:42:10.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
First image: 2461049.65440406 09.01.2026 03:42:10.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
Last image: 2461247.87963419 26.07.2026 09:06:30.394 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 31 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12269
Objects passed selection criteria: 12239
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11304.5
Average stars matched: 9854.75 (87.1755 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239316 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 26 09:12:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.65440406 09.01.2026 03:42:10.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
First image: 2461049.65440406 09.01.2026 03:42:10.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
Last image: 2461247.87963419 26.07.2026 09:06:30.394 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 82
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 63 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 72290
Objects passed selection criteria: 72151
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 63460.5
Average stars matched: 58898.8 (92.8117 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1977624 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 26 09:20:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461247.87901038
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits'
wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits'
wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits'
wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:59:46.195 +29:59:43.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32
Second-epoch image center 01:59:46.195 +29:59:43.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0524 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:59:43.969 +29:59:22.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32
Second-epoch image center 01:59:43.969 +29:59:22.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0608 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:59:46.195 +29:59:43.16
Second-epoch second image center 01:59:43.969 +29:59:22.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00994 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lNkYrkSNGE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HTUcF9B0XS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gmSY02teQN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kJBj2JTi02
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 12225 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.6044 to 39.6615 deg, Dec +24.4131 to +35.2963 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.6044 to 39.6615 deg, Dec 24.4131 to 35.2963 deg
Loaded 8371 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6352 out of 6782 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6782 out of 12225 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.928900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.928900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 12225 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.6044 to 39.6615 deg, Dec +24.4131 to +35.2963 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.6044 to 39.6615 deg, Dec 24.4131 to 35.2963 deg
Loaded 8371 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6352 out of 6782 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6782 out of 12225 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 17892 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.6045 to 39.7012 deg, Dec +24.3944 to +35.3109 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.6045 to 39.7012 deg, Dec 24.3944 to 35.3109 deg
Loaded 8419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6297 out of 6881 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6881 out of 17892 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
2.2 pix Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
15.8 mag. Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lNkYrkSNGE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits' -> 'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=932, bad_region=0, passed=12225
Got 12225 stars (including 11278 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12225 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=207 n_q2=302 n_q3=208 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.091
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits -region wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HTUcF9B0XS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1402, bad_region=0, passed=17892
Got 17892 stars (including 16468 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17892 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.237 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.233 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.201 n_q1=222 n_q2=293 n_q3=217 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gmSY02teQN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=430, bad_region=0, passed=7683
Got 7683 stars (including 7245 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7683 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7579 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7579 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=954 robust_rms=11.989 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=954 robust_rms=0.348 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=954 robust_rms_before=0.962 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.343 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.348 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.343 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=224 n_q2=227 n_q3=283 n_q4=220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits -region wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kJBj2JTi02 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=396, bad_region=0, passed=7702
Got 7702 stars (including 7298 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7702 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=952 robust_rms=12.111 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=952 robust_rms=0.355 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=952 robust_rms_before=0.944 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.338 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.355 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.338 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.310 n_q1=230 n_q2=226 n_q3=276 n_q4=220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits -region wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits sigma_overall=0.347 worst_q_ratio=1.091
ref2=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits sigma_overall=0.237 worst_q_ratio=1.181
new1=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits sigma_overall=0.346 worst_q_ratio=1.157
new2=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits sigma_overall=0.352 worst_q_ratio=1.096
reference average sigma_overall=0.292 worst_q_ratio=1.136
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1_astrometric_residuals.png (955 matched stars from wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.21 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325_astrometric_residuals.png (952 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tri-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21847_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 21847_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:07:50.87 +27:56:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24301_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 24301_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:56:47.01 +34:01:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00571_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 00571_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:37:01.83 +34:15:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tri-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:59:46.195 +29:59:43.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32
Second-epoch image center 01:59:46.195 +29:59:43.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0524 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:59:43.969 +29:59:22.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32
Second-epoch image center 01:59:43.969 +29:59:22.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0608 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:59:46.195 +29:59:43.16
Second-epoch second image center 01:59:43.969 +29:59:22.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00994 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits &> /tmp/tmp.v8brSUJTWX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9o3Mrycy18
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qeae0G7tYc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BjEVyJoK9S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 73246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.5719 to 39.6906 deg, Dec +24.3227 to +35.3068 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.5719 to 39.6906 deg, Dec 24.3227 to 35.3068 deg
Loaded 8456 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5809 out of 6892 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6892 out of 73246 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.815000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.815000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 73246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.5719 to 39.6906 deg, Dec +24.3227 to +35.3068 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.5719 to 39.6906 deg, Dec 24.3227 to 35.3068 deg
Loaded 8456 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5809 out of 6892 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6892 out of 73246 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 88972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.5786 to 39.7012 deg, Dec +24.3308 to +35.3160 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.5786 to 39.7012 deg, Dec 24.3308 to 35.3160 deg
Loaded 8467 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5449 out of 6890 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6890 out of 88972 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 81 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
2.1 pix Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
16.0 mag. Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.v8brSUJTWX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits' -> 'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4778, bad_region=6, passed=73229
Got 73229 stars (including 68317 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73229 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72658 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72658 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72658 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=214 n_q2=289 n_q3=215 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits -region wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9o3Mrycy18 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=7665, bad_region=6, passed=88940
Got 88940 stars (including 81129 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.234 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.234 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.205 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.207 n_q1=216 n_q2=285 n_q3=233 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qeae0G7tYc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1873, bad_region=9, passed=46834
Got 46834 stars (including 44879 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46834 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46341 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.236 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=230 n_q2=220 n_q3=281 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits -region wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BjEVyJoK9S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1777, bad_region=15, passed=46452
Got 46452 stars (including 44567 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46452 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.270 n_q1=233 n_q2=222 n_q3=274 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.027
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits -region wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_043307_TTUQ1b1x1_1241777_1APrYxBg/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tri-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:37:26.95 +25:27:28.6: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:05:12.76 +28:01:59.0: 14.85 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:53:04.58 +32:51:46.0: 14.69 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:11:53.02 +32:50:06.3: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:31:10.09 +28:09:52.2: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:29:05.36 +33:04:16.2: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:42:41.70 +34:41:46.4: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:05:12.76 +28:01:59.0: 14.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:37:26.95 +25:27:28.6: 13.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:05:12.76 +28:01:59.0: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.7612 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:37:26.95 +25:27:28.6: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1698 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:53:04.58 +32:51:46.0: 14.63 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:53:04.58 +32:51:46.0: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6526 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:26:57.51 +34:29:50.4: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:31:10.09 +28:09:52.2: 13.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:31:10.09 +28:09:52.2: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9548 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:11:53.02 +32:50:06.3: 13.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:10:15.63 +30:36:54.8: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:11:53.02 +32:50:06.3: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9984 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:42:41.70 +34:41:46.4: 13.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:29:05.36 +33:04:16.2: 13.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:42:41.70 +34:41:46.4: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8879 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:29:05.36 +33:04:16.2: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9160 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:10:15.63 +30:36:54.8: 13.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:10:15.63 +30:36:54.8: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3745 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:26:57.51 +34:29:50.4: 13.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:26:57.51 +34:29:50.4: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5079 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:36:52.03 +29:25:15.6: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:11:05.82 +30:07:33.5: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:58:55.92 +34:21:18.1: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:11:05.82 +30:07:33.5: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:11:05.82 +30:07:33.5: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5147 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:50:38.84 +27:55:42.5: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:22:08.54 +30:20:23.9: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:36:52.03 +29:25:15.6: 12.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:36:52.03 +29:25:15.6: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0556 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:41:50.57 +30:03:24.7: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:25:36.67 +29:53:41.5: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:58:55.92 +34:21:18.1: 13.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:58:55.92 +34:21:18.1: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3003 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:22:08.54 +30:20:23.9: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:22:08.54 +30:20:23.9: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1264 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:41:50.57 +30:03:24.7: 13.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:55:04.21 +27:16:03.9: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:41:50.57 +30:03:24.7: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4066 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:50:38.84 +27:55:42.5: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:50:38.84 +27:55:42.5: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1364 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:59:36.03 +27:39:28.8: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:25:36.67 +29:53:41.5: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:25:36.67 +29:53:41.5: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1583 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:55:04.21 +27:16:03.9: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:41:51.53 +30:03:53.9: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:55:04.21 +27:16:03.9: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4860 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:28:15.63 +30:34:30.1: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:59:36.03 +27:39:28.8: 13.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:59:36.03 +27:39:28.8: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5616 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:03:34.25 +25:10:47.7: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:41:51.53 +30:03:53.9: 13.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:28:15.63 +30:34:30.1: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:28:15.63 +30:34:30.1: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6901 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:41:51.53 +30:03:53.9: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5344 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:50:34.40 +27:57:42.3: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:27:16.96 +33:34:44.0: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:03:34.25 +25:10:47.7: 13.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:03:34.25 +25:10:47.7: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6183 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:27:16.96 +33:34:44.0: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:27:16.96 +33:34:44.0: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5512 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:50:34.40 +27:57:42.3: 13.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:09:38.86 +27:22:48.7: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:50:34.40 +27:57:42.3: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6505 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:39:46.27 +30:05:06.9: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:20:15.16 +29:48:12.2: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:50:00.01 +31:05:00.6: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:37:17.36 +27:41:11.1: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:09:38.86 +27:22:48.7: 13.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:09:38.86 +27:22:48.7: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5804 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:39:46.27 +30:05:06.9: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:39:46.27 +30:05:06.9: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6975 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:50:00.01 +31:05:00.6: 13.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:50:00.01 +31:05:00.6: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7387 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:37:17.36 +27:41:11.1: 13.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:58:08.41 +31:05:49.7: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:37:17.36 +27:41:11.1: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8024 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:20:15.16 +29:48:12.2: 13.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:20:15.16 +29:48:12.2: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6114 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:45:38.88 +34:16:49.4: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:23:51.79 +33:29:20.1: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:35:08.54 +28:43:12.5: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:58:08.41 +31:05:49.7: 13.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:51:42.13 +33:45:29.0: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:58:08.41 +31:05:49.7: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6140 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:35:08.54 +28:43:12.5: 13.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:45:38.88 +34:16:49.4: 13.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:35:08.54 +28:43:12.5: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9203 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:45:38.88 +34:16:49.4: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9067 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:56:01.58 +29:51:27.1: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:06:23.06 +26:01:31.9: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:51:42.13 +33:45:29.0: 13.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:10:20.57 +25:24:47.1: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:23:51.79 +33:29:20.1: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:51:42.13 +33:45:29.0: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8351 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:22:36.66 +31:31:44.6: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:23:51.79 +33:29:20.1: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6253 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:14:02.65 +34:38:13.3: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:56:01.58 +29:51:27.1: 14.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:56:01.58 +29:51:27.1: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8574 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:25:24.09 +31:10:34.0: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:06:23.06 +26:01:31.9: 13.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:06:23.06 +26:01:31.9: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8340 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:22:36.66 +31:31:44.6: 13.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:10:20.57 +25:24:47.1: 13.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:10:20.57 +25:24:47.1: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7157 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:22:36.66 +31:31:44.6: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6681 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:14:02.65 +34:38:13.3: 13.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:14:02.65 +34:38:13.3: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7965 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:55:00.86 +27:33:28.3: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:25:24.09 +31:10:34.0: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:25:24.09 +31:10:34.0: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9123 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:49:52.49 +27:13:34.8: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:55:00.86 +27:33:28.3: 13.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:55:00.86 +27:33:28.3: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8798 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:49:52.49 +27:13:34.8: 13.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:59:16.76 +34:32:18.7: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:49:52.49 +27:13:34.8: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8641 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:01:37.83 +28:03:45.5: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:59:16.76 +34:32:18.7: 13.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:28:00.94 +31:50:49.4: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:59:16.76 +34:32:18.7: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8743 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:07:27.87 +33:09:58.4: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:02:23.58 +29:44:16.9: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:01:37.83 +28:03:45.5: 16.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:49:19.34 +32:26:18.9: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:39:35.84 +30:04:49.1: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:44:00.72 +32:44:48.7: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:49:19.34 +32:26:18.9: 14.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:45:30.00 +27:07:52.2: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:28:00.94 +31:50:49.4: 13.91 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:49:19.34 +32:26:18.9: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1787 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:28:00.94 +31:50:49.4: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9180 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:39:35.84 +30:04:49.1: 13.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:39:35.84 +30:04:49.1: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0447 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:19:11.92 +28:13:49.1: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:07:27.87 +33:09:58.4: 13.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:07:27.87 +33:09:58.4: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9926 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:02:23.58 +29:44:16.9: 13.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:02:23.58 +29:44:16.9: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9229 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:44:00.72 +32:44:48.7: 13.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:44:00.72 +32:44:48.7: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1796 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:19:11.92 +28:13:49.1: 14.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:19:11.92 +28:13:49.1: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1305 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:45:30.00 +27:07:52.2: 13.95 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:45:30.00 +27:07:52.2: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0515 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:41:28.34 +29:22:23.9: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:14:28.67 +28:28:21.2: 14.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:41:28.34 +29:22:23.9: 16.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:14:28.67 +28:28:21.2: 14.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:14:28.67 +28:28:21.2: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4770 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out100957.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101264.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 29s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100325_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100325_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100331_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100331_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100337_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100337_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100338_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100338_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:24:06.45 +26:22:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100344_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100344_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100350_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100350_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100352_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100352_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100355_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100355_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:38:08.59 +30:14:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100360_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100360_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100363_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100363_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:04:07.58 +33:40:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100366_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100366_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100367_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100367_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100368_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100368_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:09:22.67 +28:22:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100369_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100369_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:12:23.99 +33:35:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100431_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100431_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:09:29.37 +25:57:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100558_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100558_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:06:55.97 +25:41:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100565_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100565_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:17:29.75 +33:50:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100566_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100566_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100629_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100629_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:25:01.70 +33:53:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100633_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100633_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100662_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100662_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:41:38.19 +33:19:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100666_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100666_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100687_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100687_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100698_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100698_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100699_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100699_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100711_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100711_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:31:50.00 +28:50:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100739_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100739_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100747_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100747_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:28:57.75 +34:55:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100751_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100751_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100774_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100774_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100778_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100778_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100783_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100783_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100789_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100789_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:11:28.94 +31:30:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100790_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100790_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100801_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100801_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100802_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100802_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:27:19.50 +32:43:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100808_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100808_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100817_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100817_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:09:18.39 +33:55:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100820_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100820_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100825_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100825_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100827_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100827_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100829_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100829_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100841_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100841_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100844_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100844_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:11:10.61 +25:57:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100846_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100846_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:01:10.61 +25:11:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100847_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100847_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100858_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100858_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100865_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100865_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100871_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100871_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100872_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100872_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100884_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100884_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100892_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100892_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100894_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100894_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100896_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100896_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100901_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100901_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100904_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100904_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100917_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100917_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100919_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100919_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100927_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100927_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:24:56.01 +28:50:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100931_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100931_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:39:26.21 +27:11:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100933_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100933_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100936_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100936_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:15:47.27 +33:20:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100953_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100953_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:36:37.00 +32:00:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100957_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
Preparing report for the candidate 100957_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100963_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100963_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100984_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100984_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100991_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 100991_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:44:09.84 +30:29:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101003_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 101003_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101011_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 101011_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101015_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 101015_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101021_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 101021_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101026_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 101026_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101117_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 101117_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101169_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
Preparing report for the candidate 101169_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101258_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 101258_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101264_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
Preparing report for the candidate 101264_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06570_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 06570_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68673_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 68673_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:07:50.88 +27:56:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13103_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 13103_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10047_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 10047_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:56:47.01 +34:01:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02802_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 02802_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_04-06-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks