NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Tau-01-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.37349    2461245.87349    12.56    03:54:57.37 +33:03:52.2   4027 5032   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    12.73    03:54:57.49 +33:03:52.9   4032 5029   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 24.3740  2461245.8740  12.64  03:54:57.43 +33:03:52.5
161.60789 -15.69192 galactic  Per  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 5.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
980 Anacostia               -1     -1       1  12.9     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:54:57.43 +33:03:52.5:  16.31 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:54:57.43 +33:03:52.5:  16.26 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Tau-01-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Tau-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Tau-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Tau-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 549005 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 549005 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits_preview.png'
Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits

renamed 'Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits_preview.png'
Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 500.8057 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 607.2146 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1838.0733 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 523.8824 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1787.0766 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 552.5220 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.67023 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.052 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 26.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-24T03:57:39.5097549' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-24T08:57:39.5097549' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61245.3733739466 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-24T08:57:49.4129746' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61245.373488565 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 59.9990572294837 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 30.0002530852265 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 19.3561111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 66.1661111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.99314591266109 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29515 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29515 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 51.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 26.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 25.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/d_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits :) Spent 0.782880 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/d_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 26.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-24T03:59:06.9789399' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-24T08:59:06.9789399' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61245.3743863194 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-24T08:59:16.8793707' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61245.3745009145 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 59.9990570644795 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 30.0002530696643 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 19.6361111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 66.3269444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.95285462527944 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29515 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29515 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 51.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 26.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 25.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/d_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits :) Spent 0.767183 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/d_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits


fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461245.87348969 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits' wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits Image size: 943.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:00:10.520 +29:57:19.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 Second-epoch image center 04:00:10.520 +29:57:19.68 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0585 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits Image size: 943.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:00:08.270 +29:57:36.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 Second-epoch image center 04:00:08.270 +29:57:36.31 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0498 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:00:10.520 +29:57:19.68 Second-epoch second image center 04:00:08.270 +29:57:36.31 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00934 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O3ig7dCRVo Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HmblrcrA4l Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dDnpLBdB5E Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MhAyM2X8wp Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5843 to 69.6283 deg, Dec +24.3538 to +35.3066 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5843 to 69.6283 deg, Dec 24.3538 to 35.3066 deg Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5547 out of 6059 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6059 out of 13390 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.967400 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.967400 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5843 to 69.6283 deg, Dec +24.3538 to +35.3066 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5843 to 69.6283 deg, Dec 24.3538 to 35.3066 deg Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5547 out of 6059 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6059 out of 13390 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=6.0) Read 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5745 to 69.6282 deg, Dec +24.3539 to +35.3110 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5745 to 69.6282 deg, Dec 24.3539 to 35.3110 deg Loaded 7268 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5559 out of 6072 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6072 out of 13513 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 2.5 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits 2.5 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 15.5 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 14.1 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits 14.1 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.O3ig7dCRVo (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13390 Got 13390 stars (including 12252 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12986 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12984 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12984 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=288 n_q2=226 n_q3=157 n_q4=303 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.HmblrcrA4l (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13513 Got 13513 stars (including 12361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13134 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13136 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13136 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=285 n_q2=225 n_q3=160 n_q4=307 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.dDnpLBdB5E (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=145, bad_region=0, passed=2569 Got 2569 stars (including 2418 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2569 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013099 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010479 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2502 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2500 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2500 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=147 n_q2=55 n_q3=495 n_q4=278 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.784 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.MhAyM2X8wp (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=168, bad_region=0, passed=3220 Got 3220 stars (including 3050 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3220 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013097 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010478 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3115 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3115 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3115 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.006 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=286 n_q2=24 n_q3=422 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.016 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.342 worst_q_ratio=1.141 ref2=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits sigma_overall=0.368 worst_q_ratio=1.234 new1=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits sigma_overall=0.315 worst_q_ratio=1.784 new2=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits sigma_overall=0.334 worst_q_ratio=3.016 reference average sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.1875 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 2nd new image (fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits) flagged: sigma=0.334 (ref avg 0.355), ratio=3.016 (ref avg 1.1875), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2. Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits .... Determining astrometry method... Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... Choosing aperture... Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 3072 high-SNR stars for plate solving This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2742053.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out2742053.axy"... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10). log-odds ratio 73.3126 (6.90659e+31), 14 match, 0 conflict, 44 distractors, 45 index. RA,Dec = (60.015,29.9704), pixel scale 5.96018 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++----++----+-+---++----+-----++-----------+----+-----+(best)-----------------+------------------------ Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2742053.solved to indicate this. Field: out2742053.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (60.029320, 29.961385) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (04:00:07.037, +29:57:40.988). Field size: 15.8166 x 10.5755 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 3.23052 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits' -> 'fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits' WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jul 24 06:02 fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jul 24 06:02 out2742053.wcs Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits)... done! done! All done! done The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits (fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits) Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2742053.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out2742053.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.765 degrees of RA,Dec (60.0303,29.9622) Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-100). log-odds ratio 73.3126 (6.90659e+31), 14 match, 0 conflict, 44 distractors, 45 index. RA,Dec = (60.015,29.9704), pixel scale 5.96018 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++----++----+-+---++----+-----++-----------+----+-----+(best)-----------------+------------------------ Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2742053.solved to indicate this. Field: out2742053.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (60.028265, 29.961874) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (04:00:06.783, +29:57:42.746). Field size: 15.8075 x 10.5742 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 3.22933 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jul 24 06:02 fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jul 24 06:02 out2742053.wcs Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits)... done! done! All done! The WCS header appears to be added with no errors. Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Reading input file "wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... simplexy: found 17032 sources. Solving... Reading file "./wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.6497, 954.148] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 29.6547 (7.56596e+12), 4 match, 0 conflict, 30 distractors, 8 index. RA,Dec = (60.0273,29.9611), pixel scale 5.97837 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+----------+------------------+(best)------------------------------------------------------------------ --> log-odds 29.6547 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 35.9186 (3.97436e+15), 6 match, 0 conflict, 30 distractors, 18 index. RA,Dec = (60.0273,29.9611), pixel scale 5.97837 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+--------+-+------------------+-+(best)------------------------------------+--------------------------- --> log-odds 35.9186 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 177.172 (8.80497e+76), 30 match, 0 conflict, 224 distractors, 45 index. RA,Dec = (60.0273,29.9611), pixel scale 5.97837 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++---+----+-+------------+-----+-++-------+-------------+-------------+++--------------+--------+- --> log-odds 177.172 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 339.053 (1.77315e+147), 52 match, 0 conflict, 214 distractors, 82 index. RA,Dec = (60.0273,29.9611), pixel scale 5.97837 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++---+----+-++-++--------+---+-++++-------+-----++-----+++----+-+-+---+++-+------------+--+-----+- --> log-odds 339.053 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 756.149 (inf), 106 match, 0 conflict, 168 distractors, 186 index. RA,Dec = (60.0273,29.9611), pixel scale 5.97837 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++-++++++++-++++++---+-+-+---+-+++++-++++++++-++++-+--+++++---+++++---+++++-+--++-+---+++++-----++ --> log-odds 756.149 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1360.59 (inf), 213 match, 0 conflict, 500 distractors, 370 index. RA,Dec = (60.0273,29.9611), pixel scale 5.97837 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-+-++++++-++-++++-++++-++-++++++++-++++++++-++++-+--+++++---++++++--+++++-+-+++-+---+++++-+-++++ --> log-odds 1360.59 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 2460.37 (inf), 417 match, 0 conflict, 849 distractors, 723 index. RA,Dec = (60.0273,29.9611), pixel scale 5.97837 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-++++++++++++++++-++++-++-++++++++-++++++++++++++++-+++++---++++++--++++++++++++----+++++-+-++++ --> log-odds 2460.37 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 4469.6 (inf), 836 match, 0 conflict, 1400 distractors, 1465 index. RA,Dec = (60.0273,29.9611), pixel scale 5.97837 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++-++++++++++++++++-++++-++-++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++-+++++++++++++-+--+++++-+-++++ --> log-odds 4469.6 Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.6497, 954.148] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 29.6547 (7.56596e+12), 4 match, 0 conflict, 30 distractors, 8 index. RA,Dec = (60.0273,29.9611), pixel scale 5.97837 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+----------+------------------+(best)------------------------------------------------------------------ --> log-odds 29.6547 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 35.9186 (3.97436e+15), 6 match, 0 conflict, 30 distractors, 18 index. RA,Dec = (60.0273,29.9611), pixel scale 5.97837 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+--------+-+------------------+-+(best)------------------------------------+--------------------------- --> log-odds 35.9186 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 177.172 (8.80497e+76), 30 match, 0 conflict, 224 distractors, 45 index. RA,Dec = (60.0273,29.9611), pixel scale 5.97837 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++---+----+-+------------+-----+-++-------+-------------+-------------+++--------------+--------+- --> log-odds 177.172 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 339.053 (1.77315e+147), 52 match, 0 conflict, 214 distractors, 82 index. RA,Dec = (60.0273,29.9611), pixel scale 5.97837 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++---+----+-++-++--------+---+-++++-------+-----++-----+++----+-+-+---+++-+------------+--+-----+- --> log-odds 339.053 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 756.149 (inf), 106 match, 0 conflict, 168 distractors, 186 index. RA,Dec = (60.0273,29.9611), pixel scale 5.97837 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++-++++++++-++++++---+-+-+---+-+++++-++++++++-++++-+--+++++---+++++---+++++-+--++-+---+++++-----++ --> log-odds 756.149 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1360.59 (inf), 213 match, 0 conflict, 500 distractors, 370 index. RA,Dec = (60.0273,29.9611), pixel scale 5.97837 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-+-++++++-++-++++-++++-++-++++++++-++++++++-++++-+--+++++---++++++--+++++-+-+++-+---+++++-+-++++ --> log-odds 1360.59 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 2460.37 (inf), 417 match, 0 conflict, 849 distractors, 723 index. RA,Dec = (60.0273,29.9611), pixel scale 5.97837 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-++++++++++++++++-++++-++-++++++++-++++++++++++++++-+++++---++++++--++++++++++++----+++++-+-++++ --> log-odds 2460.37 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 4469.6 (inf), 836 match, 0 conflict, 1400 distractors, 1465 index. RA,Dec = (60.0273,29.9611), pixel scale 5.97837 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++-++++++++++++++++-++++-++-++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++-+++++++++++++-+--+++++-+-++++ --> log-odds 4469.6 Got 16 solutions. Field: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (60.030392, 29.959687) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (04:00:07.294, +29:57:34.874). Field size: 15.8177 x 10.5768 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 3.23368 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.new"... renamed 'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits Generating wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat from image00004.cat Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits Image size: 945.1'x627.7' 15.8(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:00:07.537 +29:57:37.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 3220 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2759165.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=168, bad_region=0, passed=3220 Got 3220 stars (including 3050 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3220 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3111 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.47" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3111 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.22" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3111 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74" Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1054) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.951 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.762 sigma_q2_arcsec=5.946 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.803 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.934 n_q1=286 n_q2=18 n_q3=422 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=6.251 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 2nd new image (fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits): sigma 0.334->0.951, ratio 3.016->6.251; reverting to order 3 WARNING: 2nd new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=0.951 -- 2.68x the reference average (0.355); plate solution may be of low accuracy WARNING: 2nd new image has worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=6.251 -- 5.26x the reference average (1.1875); plate solution may be of low accuracy
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20917_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 20917_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    11.59    03:51:16.27 +33:02:07.8   3567 4993   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits **** FOUND 03:51:16.28 +33:02:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01673_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 01673_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    11.05    04:10:37.99 +34:15:54.8   5950 5880   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits **** FOUND 04:10:37.98 +34:15:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 06813_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 06813_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    11.45    03:51:52.57 +30:25:24.0   3704 3422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits **** FOUND 03:51:52.55 +30:25:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits Image size: 943.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:00:10.520 +29:57:19.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 Second-epoch image center 04:00:10.520 +29:57:19.68 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0585 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits Image size: 943.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:00:08.270 +29:57:36.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 Second-epoch image center 04:00:08.270 +29:57:36.31 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0498 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:00:10.520 +29:57:19.68 Second-epoch second image center 04:00:08.270 +29:57:36.31 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00934 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xa0KkGVbs3 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EQ6UUZ4lb3 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UqZfr8ui60 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uqZIvx5iFp Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5591 to 69.6801 deg, Dec +24.3538 to +35.3065 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5591 to 69.6801 deg, Dec 24.3538 to 35.3065 deg Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4827 out of 6106 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6106 out of 99190 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.833900 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.833900 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5591 to 69.6801 deg, Dec +24.3538 to +35.3065 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5591 to 69.6801 deg, Dec 24.3538 to 35.3065 deg Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4827 out of 6106 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6106 out of 99190 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=4.5) Read 98825 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5597 to 69.6801 deg, Dec +24.3539 to +35.3115 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5597 to 69.6801 deg, Dec 24.3539 to 35.3115 deg Loaded 7286 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4807 out of 6112 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6112 out of 98825 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=4.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 32 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.8 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 1.9 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 2.4 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits 2.5 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits 1.8 pix wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 1.9 pix wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.xa0KkGVbs3 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=7855, bad_region=9, passed=99158 Got 99158 stars (including 91129 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99158 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95807 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95809 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95808 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=274 n_q2=232 n_q3=164 n_q4=303 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.EQ6UUZ4lb3 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=7957, bad_region=10, passed=98800 Got 98800 stars (including 90683 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98800 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95502 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95501 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95501 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=274 n_q2=233 n_q3=164 n_q4=303 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.211 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.UqZfr8ui60 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=753, bad_region=3, passed=20042 Got 20042 stars (including 19261 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20042 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013099 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010479 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19463 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19463 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19463 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=148 n_q2=54 n_q3=497 n_q4=276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.613 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.uqZIvx5iFp (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=885, bad_region=4, passed=23804 Got 23804 stars (including 22888 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23804 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013097 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010478 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23024 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23024 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23024 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.956 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=291 n_q2=24 n_q3=422 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.854 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:37:35.86 +28:26:36.0: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:01:55.89 +31:58:48.8: 12.76 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:39:50.64 +29:05:02.2: 12.57 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:59:11.62 +35:01:29.6: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:54:57.43 +33:03:52.5: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:55:53.02 +32:10:14.2: 13.22 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:15:32.88 +33:50:08.0: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:44:23.96 +32:10:59.0: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:39:50.64 +29:05:02.2: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:59:11.62 +35:01:29.6: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:50.64 +29:05:02.2: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9378 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:11.62 +35:01:29.6: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7384 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:54:57.43 +33:03:52.5: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:01:55.89 +31:58:48.8: 12.72 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:37:35.86 +28:26:36.0: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:55:53.02 +32:10:14.2: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:55.89 +31:58:48.8: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8256 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:37:35.86 +28:26:36.0: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3774 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:53.02 +32:10:14.2: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9797 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:44:35.60 +27:52:29.4: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:44:23.96 +32:10:59.0: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:23.96 +32:10:59.0: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0260 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:15:32.88 +33:50:08.0: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:32.88 +33:50:08.0: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1184 delta=-1.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:07:46.81 +33:39:11.9: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:44:35.60 +27:52:29.4: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:35.60 +27:52:29.4: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1457 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:04:23.00 +32:58:02.1: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:00:12.53 +29:34:22.4: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:50:54.61 +29:40:02.9: 13.59 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:07:46.81 +33:39:11.9: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:46.81 +33:39:11.9: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3243 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:56:24.88 +35:07:03.7: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:11:45.21 +31:32:27.3: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:04:23.00 +32:58:02.1: 13.55 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:23.00 +32:58:02.1: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3377 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:00:12.53 +29:34:22.4: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:50:54.61 +29:40:02.9: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:12.53 +29:34:22.4: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1304 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:54.61 +29:40:02.9: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3463 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:56:24.88 +35:07:03.7: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:24.88 +35:07:03.7: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6048 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:11:45.21 +31:32:27.3: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:45.21 +31:32:27.3: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2787 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117640.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117535_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117535_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.37349    2461245.87349    13.04    03:39:50.63 +29:05:02.3   2142 2576   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    12.88    03:39:50.65 +29:05:02.2   2147 2574   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117537_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117537_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.37349    2461245.87349    12.74    03:59:11.64 +35:01:29.6   4497 6245   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    12.74    03:59:11.59 +35:01:29.5   4502 6242   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117603_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117603_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    11.92    04:10:49.06 +33:34:36.4   6006 5466   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits **** FOUND 04:10:49.08 +33:34:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117634_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117634_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    12.66    03:56:26.79 +35:06:47.6   4160 6279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits **** FOUND 03:56:26.80 +35:06:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117640_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 Preparing report for the candidate 117640_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117644_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117644_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    12.88    03:24:26.78 +33:33:18.7   0149 5302   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits **** FOUND 03:24:26.77 +33:33:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117650_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117650_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.37349    2461245.87349    12.54    03:37:35.88 +28:26:36.0   1847 2185   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    12.30    03:37:35.84 +28:26:36.0   1852 2183   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117679_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117679_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.37349    2461245.87349    12.83    04:01:55.91 +31:58:49.2   4945 4425   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    12.82    04:01:55.86 +31:58:48.4   4950 4423   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117689_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117689_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.37349    2461245.87349    12.98    03:55:53.05 +32:10:14.8   4169 4498   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    12.98    03:55:52.99 +32:10:13.6   4174 4496   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117695_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117695_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    13.04    04:15:32.25 +33:49:33.8   6584 5670   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits **** FOUND 04:15:32.00 +33:49:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117700_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117700_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.37349    2461245.87349    13.10    03:44:23.96 +32:10:59.5   2704 4457   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    12.98    03:44:23.97 +32:10:58.5   2709 4454   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117711_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117711_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    13.28    03:51:45.44 +34:21:50.1   3598 5800   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits **** FOUND 03:51:45.49 +34:21:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117717_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117717_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.37349    2461245.87349    13.10    04:15:32.89 +33:50:10.2   6580 5679   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    13.14    04:15:32.87 +33:50:05.8   6585 5676   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117735_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117735_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    13.33    04:13:29.68 +33:27:03.7   6348 5420   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits **** FOUND 04:13:29.73 +33:27:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117736_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117736_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    12.96    04:08:24.85 +32:27:45.1   5754 4770   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits **** FOUND 04:08:24.87 +32:27:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117739_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117739_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.37349    2461245.87349    13.12    03:44:35.68 +27:52:29.9   2786 1859   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    13.17    03:44:35.52 +27:52:29.0   2791 1856   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117740_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117740_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.37349    2461245.87349    13.33    04:07:46.81 +33:39:11.5   5617 5484   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    13.32    04:07:46.81 +33:39:12.3   5622 5482   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117750_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117750_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    13.34    04:18:23.23 +33:51:35.9   6939 5726   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits **** FOUND 04:18:23.31 +33:51:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117753_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117753_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.37349    2461245.87349    13.29    04:04:22.82 +32:58:02.1   5218 5040   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    13.39    04:04:23.19 +32:58:02.1   5224 5037   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117757_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117757_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    13.64    03:37:56.97 +34:56:44.1   1866 6124   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits **** FOUND 03:37:57.00 +34:56:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117761_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117761_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.37349    2461245.87349    13.15    04:00:12.44 +29:34:22.9   4806 2966   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    13.12    04:00:12.63 +29:34:21.9   4811 2963   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117775_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117775_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.37349    2461245.87349    13.35    03:50:54.64 +29:40:04.3   3590 2966   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    13.34    03:50:54.57 +29:40:01.6   3595 2962   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117778_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117778_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    13.27    04:11:06.73 +33:36:14.1   6041 5486   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits **** FOUND 04:11:06.75 +33:36:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117788_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117788_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.37349    2461245.87349    13.28    04:11:45.19 +31:32:26.7   6216 4253   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    13.28    04:11:45.23 +31:32:27.9   6221 4250   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117798_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117798_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.37349    2461245.87349    13.66    03:56:24.83 +35:07:04.3   4151 6284   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-57-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    13.56    03:56:24.92 +35:07:03.1   4156 6281   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117800_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117800_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    13.78    03:38:00.80 +34:01:12.5   1880 5559   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits **** FOUND 03:38:00.82 +34:01:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117808_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 117808_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    13.54    04:13:17.90 +33:49:47.0   6304 5646   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits **** FOUND 04:13:17.92 +33:49:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 11025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 11025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    11.04    04:10:37.99 +34:15:54.8   5950 5880   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits **** FOUND 04:10:37.97 +34:15:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 50794_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 50794_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    12.25    03:31:28.88 +30:30:53.0   1041 3435   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits **** FOUND 03:31:28.90 +30:30:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51908_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 51908_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    11.53    03:51:52.59 +30:25:23.7   3704 3422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits **** FOUND 03:51:52.59 +30:25:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34592_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 34592_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    12.42    04:09:53.69 +32:11:53.4   5953 4626   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits **** FOUND 04:09:53.64 +32:11:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 110522_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 The candidate 110522_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 24.37450    2461245.87450    11.80    03:51:16.29 +33:02:06.4   3567 4993   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_035947_TTUQ1b1x1_239633_N4djz9Dl/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-59-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits **** FOUND 03:51:16.31 +33:02:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 03:54:57.43 +33:03:52.5 ########### Completed Tau-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 03:54:57.43 +33:03:52.5 ################################################################################### 03:54:57.43 +33:03:52.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461245.87348969 -observatory V36 07:07:14.48 +18:32:15.9 Mercury (1.9mag) 11:08:03.02 +06:11:45.1 Venus (-4.2mag) 05:05:42.22 +22:50:23.9 Mars (1.3mag) 08:29:27.72 +19:29:26.0 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:46.85 +03:22:03.9 Saturn (0.7mag) 04:09:41.70 +20:51:37.7 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:46.15 +00:18:14.5 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:29:34.95 -23:24:07.6 Pluto (14.4mag) 15:58:13.82 -26:22:32.8 Moon (-11.2mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul 24 06:01 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461245.87348969: 08:29:31.99 +19:29:10.8 Io (6.0mag) 08:29:26.83 +19:29:31.1 Europa (6.3mag) 08:29:42.68 +19:28:28.4 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:29:51.38 +19:27:55.6 Callisto (6.7mag) 08:27:24.76 +19:20:15.6 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:29:26.19 +19:29:33.2 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:26:47.74 +19:21:44.4 Elara (17.7mag) 08:33:21.97 +19:16:13.3 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:33:35.67 +19:36:45.6 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:34.62 +03:22:15.6 Titan (8.5mag) 00:56:42.27 +03:21:56.7 Rhea (9.8mag) 00:56:18.49 +03:19:25.4 Iapetus (11.2mag) 00:56:54.79 +03:21:24.5 Hyperion (14.5mag) 00:56:28.81 +03:17:16.5 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 24 06:01 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461245.87348969: 18:12:47.44 -29:11:52.8 JWST 17:47:52.16 +33:07:31.9 Chandra 05:23:39.63 +42:36:06.5 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 24 06:01 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461245.87348969 -observatory V36 02:55:28.91 +15:59:25.5 17.8mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:08:18.05 -34:37:13.7 13.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:39:35.02 -68:25:50.6 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:05:29.28 +32:41:49.8 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 02:53:37.74 +28:00:50.6 16.1mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:50:13.88 +32:05:44.0 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:28:01.85 +26:46:15.3 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:07:57.89 +29:08:43.5 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:18:55.60 +05:12:28.2 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:11:02.05 -11:45:49.1 17.8mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:31:03.31 +67:13:46.7 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 16:06:22.00 -11:30:33.5 14.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:25:48.11 +66:30:55.2 18.0mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:50:38.51 +30:40:42.8 15.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:10:35.00 +15:34:39.6 17.6mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:22:46.49 +41:42:03.8 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:31:22.31 +47:53:14.1 17.7mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:02:32.43 -13:16:12.4 15.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:45:44.49 +26:43:02.2 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:23:21.42 -14:17:06.9 17.2mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:13:07.02 +21:46:06.2 17.5mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:50:11.77 +03:15:17.0 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:18:13.60 +78:55:07.8 17.1mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:59:08.77 +45:47:05.4 16.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:35:09.22 +06:45:10.9 17.1mag A/2026 E1 21:39:50.44 -20:44:19.7 6.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:20:30.20 -02:33:04.6 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:19:53.86 +31:01:16.2 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:37:13.35 +09:29:41.5 17.1mag 63P/Wild 00:53:01.06 -05:05:11.1 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 05:01:02.16 +20:41:16.6 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 02:43:18.19 +12:20:36.3 16.5mag 88P/Howell 07:16:08.03 +29:25:28.6 15.9mag 93P/Lovas 05:07:06.91 +31:16:33.5 16.6mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 08:42:51.87 +28:57:04.4 15.1mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:14:39.31 -04:27:35.8 16.9mag 124P/Mrkos 05:13:58.66 +21:06:43.3 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:02:16.92 +19:28:14.1 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 08:01:46.90 +13:50:00.1 17.2mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:21:45.93 -20:21:57.0 14.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 06:23:38.68 +36:25:43.6 15.6mag 162P/SidingSpring 18:08:42.49 +25:49:20.7 13.5mag 169P/NEAT 02:13:09.64 +08:53:15.0 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:36:15.91 -09:05:16.8 17.3mag 235P/LINEAR 20:33:34.69 -52:02:18.4 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 02:39:02.93 +18:36:26.1 15.5mag 260P/McNaught 06:20:04.28 +37:38:54.3 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:07:06.02 +04:43:08.7 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski 08:47:18.67 +19:04:36.5 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 08:13:30.29 +38:01:48.5 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.4K Jul 24 06:01 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-26eg 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 24 06:01 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 24 06:01 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 14:37:09.408 +59:50:34.02 AT 2026txe 2026-07-04.24 20.7267 15:28:44.304 +66:51:28.10 AT 2026txd 2026-07-08.26 20.2643 21:50:49.233 +24:57:52.83 AT 2026txc 2026-07-11.01 19.66 16:24:15.363 +53:52:26.55 AT 2026txb 2026-07-11.76 19.17 17:27:12.795 +25:29:25.90 AT 2026txa 2026-07-11.77 18.88 17:41:19.739 +49:31:59.41 AT 2026twz 2026-07-11.86 19.2 17:57:43.660 +27:18:37.46 AT 2026twy 2026-07-10.78 17.85 21:22:12.202 -05:27:50.11 AT 2026twx 2026-07-11.92 19.62 21:41:05.874 -00:44:05.29 AT 2026tww 2026-07-11.91 18.97 22:52:20.244 +08:14:57.79 AT 2026twv 2026-07-11.97 19.33 22:42:29.978 +07:49:23.31 AT 2026twu 2026-07-12.04 19.6 16:30:23.785 +54:01:13.69 AT 2026twt 2026-07-11.90 19.1 22:10:51.145 +08:26:42.80 AT 2026tws 2026-07-12.06 19.01 23:46:37.559 +04:51:10.62 AT 2026twr 2026-07-12.05 19.48 17:54:33.311 +44:32:29.77 AT 2026twq 2026-07-12.01 18.2 23:51:04.058 +06:06:30.13 AT 2026twp 2026-07-12.05 19.41 22:49:13.425 +07:24:01.48 AT 2026two 2026-07-12.03 19.46 22:00:35.405 +06:42:17.09 AT 2026twn 2026-07-12.05 19.07 17:03:26.927 +50:27:33.03 AT 2026twm 2026-07-10.92 19.51 23:54:42.693 +05:22:53.70 AT 2026twl 2026-07-12.05 19.64 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Jul 24 06:01 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 88 C