This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 24.2719 2461245.7719 9.24 18:59:00.38 -22:51:16.2
13.12015 -11.78143 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.8 Flora 1 0 1 9.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:00.38 -22:51:16.2: 15.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:59:00.38 -22:51:16.2: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461245.7719,9.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260724.2719 9.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 24.2719 2461245.7719 11.51 18:55:28.02 -28:12:50.9
7.77966 -13.25946 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis -0 0 0 11.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:55:28.02 -28:12:50.9: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:55:28.02 -28:12:50.9: 14.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461245.7719,11.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260724.2719 11.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 24.2719 2461245.7719 13.47 19:18:06.79 -22:55:01.0
14.90160 -15.82828 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.468 Lina -0 2 2 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:18:06.79 -22:55:01.0: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:18:06.79 -22:55:01.0: 15.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461245.7719,13.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260724.2719 13.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 24.2719 2461245.7719 13.63 19:02:25.33 -27:21:38.3
9.22040 -14.32574 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.9 pix
The object was found in VSX12" PS1-3PI J190225.64-272126.8
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.460 r Y 0.750 r 2457000.63700 0.534175000000
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.2013 Tucapel 0 2 2 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:02:25.33 -27:21:38.3: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:02:25.33 -27:21:38.3: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
PS1-3PI J190225.64-272126.8,2461245.7719,13.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
PS1-3PI J190225.64-272126.8 20260724.2719 13.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 24.2719 2461245.7719 13.79 18:59:33.24 -27:24:54.5
8.90654 -13.76395 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.503 Evelyn -2 3 3 14.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:33.24 -27:24:54.5: 15.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:59:33.24 -27:24:54.5: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461245.7719,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260724.2719 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
First image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Last image: 2461245.77220979 24.07.2026 06:31:48.926 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10262
Objects passed selection criteria: 10236
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8245.25
Average stars matched: 7781 (94.3695 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118904 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Jul 23 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-167-gea1982e4
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-23)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 24 01:39:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
First image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Last image: 2461245.77220979 24.07.2026 06:31:48.926 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 138
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 81 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 118190
Objects passed selection criteria: 117933
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 96377.5
Average stars matched: 90731.2 (94.1415 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1947420 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Jul 23 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-167-gea1982e4
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-23)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 24 01:44:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461245.77167501
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.510 -26:00:04.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:12:01.510 -26:00:04.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0049 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:59.918 -26:00:30.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:11:59.918 -26:00:30.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0063 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:01.510 -26:00:04.40
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:59.918 -26:00:30.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00944 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RpuLRnI7cB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QsgE7CwPIH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jr1qCR9gT7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZDUMkHwWiL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.547700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.547700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 10687 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9561 to 297.0874 deg, Dec -31.2647 to -20.5650 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9561 to 297.0874 deg, Dec -31.2647 to -20.5650 deg
Loaded 13339 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7826 out of 8095 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8095 out of 10687 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.2 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.RpuLRnI7cB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=984, bad_region=2274, passed=13260
Got 13260 stars (including 10138 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11165 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.693 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.513 n_q1=321 n_q2=159 n_q3=272 n_q4=187 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.371
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QsgE7CwPIH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=726, bad_region=1847, passed=10687
Got 10687 stars (including 8208 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10687 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.690 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.534 n_q1=311 n_q2=159 n_q3=272 n_q4=188 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.218
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jr1qCR9gT7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=564, bad_region=2249, passed=8954
Got 8954 stars (including 6266 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8954 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.810 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.608 n_q1=342 n_q2=188 n_q3=242 n_q4=178 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.531
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZDUMkHwWiL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=555, bad_region=2255, passed=8950
Got 8950 stars (including 6240 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8950 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.557 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.793 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.682 n_q1=346 n_q2=192 n_q3=238 n_q4=175 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.423
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits sigma_overall=0.506 worst_q_ratio=1.371
ref2=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits sigma_overall=0.567 worst_q_ratio=1.218
new1=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits sigma_overall=0.529 worst_q_ratio=1.531
new2=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits sigma_overall=0.557 worst_q_ratio=1.423
reference average sigma_overall=0.5365 worst_q_ratio=1.2945
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055_astrometric_residuals.png (930 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032_astrometric_residuals.png (950 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033_astrometric_residuals.png (951 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:08:09.00 -25:34:23.8: 11.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:00.38 -22:51:16.2: 15.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:08:09.00 -25:34:23.8: 11.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:59:00.38 -22:51:16.2: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:08:09.00 -25:34:23.8: ref_mag=11.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5971 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20335.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20170_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 20170_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:11.24 -28:46:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20335_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 20335_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20915_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 20915_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:06.28 -22:42:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21705_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 21705_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
18:59:00.38 -22:51:16.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.510 -26:00:04.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:12:01.510 -26:00:04.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0049 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:59.918 -26:00:30.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:11:59.918 -26:00:30.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0063 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:01.510 -26:00:04.40
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:59.918 -26:00:30.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00944 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YIdZhxUdwc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8rA0UO64Wm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9Sj68mPDGx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vVAtUOtotS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.361800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.361800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 118893 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9129 to 297.0888 deg, Dec -31.2647 to -20.5527 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9129 to 297.0888 deg, Dec -31.2647 to -20.5527 deg
Loaded 13400 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10023 out of 11609 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11609 out of 118893 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 96 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.3 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.YIdZhxUdwc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=13408, bad_region=17584, passed=145618
Got 145618 stars (including 115576 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 145618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130002 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.764 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.467 n_q1=325 n_q2=171 n_q3=233 n_q4=211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.513
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8rA0UO64Wm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=8799, bad_region=12630, passed=118884
Got 118884 stars (including 98108 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 118884 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.584 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.739 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=323 n_q2=157 n_q3=250 n_q4=207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.323
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9Sj68mPDGx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=6114, bad_region=16730, passed=93431
Got 93431 stars (including 72155 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 93431 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78547 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78546 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.751 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.500 n_q1=353 n_q2=170 n_q3=255 n_q4=174 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.443
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vVAtUOtotS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=6185, bad_region=17069, passed=94462
Got 94462 stars (including 72882 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 94462 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.798 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.551 n_q1=363 n_q2=164 n_q3=256 n_q4=168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.524
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_013320_TTUQ2b1x1_2513624_sS6bVUe0/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:24:41.34 -24:33:22.7: 13.54 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:30:42.83 -28:48:51.1: 13.98 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:22.82 -23:33:47.7: 14.19 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:19:34.15 -24:16:00.5: 14.08 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:25:13.75 -28:41:47.2: 13.75 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:18:30.89 -26:36:25.8: 13.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:09:55.38 -24:24:48.2: 13.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:08:20.23 -23:14:32.7: 14.17 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:57:18.94 -26:30:03.9: 14.46 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:19:34.15 -24:16:00.5: 13.78 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:25:13.75 -28:41:47.2: 13.59 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:09:55.38 -24:24:48.2: 13.43 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:24:41.34 -24:33:22.7: 13.69 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:34.15 -24:16:00.5: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.8446 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:30:42.83 -28:48:51.1: 14.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:25:13.75 -28:41:47.2: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.7638 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:09:55.38 -24:24:48.2: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5482 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:07:22.82 -23:33:47.7: 14.12 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:57:18.94 -26:30:03.9: 14.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:18:30.89 -26:36:25.8: 13.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:24:41.34 -24:33:22.7: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8936 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:42.83 -28:48:51.1: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6628 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:22.82 -23:33:47.7: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8498 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:57:18.94 -26:30:03.9: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0084 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:18:30.89 -26:36:25.8: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7562 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:08:20.23 -23:14:32.7: 13.86 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:08:20.23 -23:14:32.7: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0467 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:52:33.32 -25:25:41.0: 13.94 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:47.24 -23:47:54.2: 13.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:52:51.05 -28:33:17.0: 13.54 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:38.73 -23:41:47.5: 13.56 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:15:07.54 -27:36:03.6: 13.29 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:12:13.36 -22:56:36.1: 13.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:17.46 -23:12:22.6: 13.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:05:38.15 -23:40:13.5: 13.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:28:51.53 -29:33:21.0: 13.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:52:33.32 -25:25:41.0: 14.15 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:52:33.32 -25:25:41.0: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5825 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:30:57.36 -24:58:25.4: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:59:17.46 -23:12:22.6: 13.34 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:05:38.15 -23:40:13.5: 13.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:52:51.05 -28:33:17.0: 13.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:59:38.73 -23:41:47.5: 13.30 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:56:47.24 -23:47:54.2: 12.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:15:07.54 -27:36:03.6: 13.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:17.46 -23:12:22.6: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4144 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:05:38.15 -23:40:13.5: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3616 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:28:51.53 -29:33:21.0: 12.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:52:51.05 -28:33:17.0: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.5380 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:47.24 -23:47:54.2: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3139 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:38.73 -23:41:47.5: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4610 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:15:07.54 -27:36:03.6: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7002 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:12:13.36 -22:56:36.1: 13.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:28:51.53 -29:33:21.0: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2463 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:12:13.36 -22:56:36.1: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1334 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:30:57.36 -24:58:25.4: 13.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:57.36 -24:58:25.4: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2276 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:30:23.10 -25:09:58.0: 12.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:40.95 -28:19:51.3: 10.14 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:12:17.58 -22:04:29.7: 12.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:22:43.71 -22:52:06.0: 12.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:30:23.10 -25:09:58.0: 12.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:23.10 -25:09:58.0: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9554 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:55:28.02 -28:12:50.9: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:28.24 -25:56:34.2: 11.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:08:49.26 -24:26:01.9: 12.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:07:40.95 -28:19:51.3: 10.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:12:17.58 -22:04:29.7: 12.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.21 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:40.95 -28:19:51.3: ref_mag=10.21 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1684 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:12:17.58 -22:04:29.7: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9126 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:22:43.71 -22:52:06.0: 12.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:22:43.71 -22:52:06.0: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7638 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:19:44.96 -22:39:15.1: 12.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:16:05.62 -24:35:24.0: 12.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:55:28.02 -28:12:50.9: 14.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:59:28.24 -25:56:34.2: 11.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:08:49.26 -24:26:01.9: 12.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:28.24 -25:56:34.2: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1619 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:08:49.26 -24:26:01.9: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6839 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:16:05.62 -24:35:24.0: 12.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:19:44.96 -22:39:15.1: 12.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:16:05.62 -24:35:24.0: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8433 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:44.96 -22:39:15.1: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8363 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:09:38.69 -27:07:32.6: 12.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:49.10 -25:03:31.7: 13.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:05:27.97 -24:10:08.7: 12.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:09:38.69 -27:07:32.6: 12.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:09:38.69 -27:07:32.6: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9655 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:03:32.79 -30:08:38.6: 13.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:55:18.33 -27:40:09.7: 12.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:18:06.79 -22:55:01.0: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:59:49.10 -25:03:31.7: 13.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:49.10 -25:03:31.7: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0681 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:05:27.97 -24:10:08.7: 13.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:05:27.97 -24:10:08.7: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1223 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:03:32.79 -30:08:38.6: 13.26 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:03:32.79 -30:08:38.6: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3029 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:20:51.31 -29:41:31.6: 13.48 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:55:18.33 -27:40:09.7: 13.04 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:55:18.33 -27:40:09.7: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1343 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:18:06.79 -22:55:01.0: 15.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:09:18.49 -25:50:41.0: 13.29 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:55:14.27 -22:29:40.1: 13.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:20:51.31 -29:41:31.6: 13.77 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:51.31 -29:41:31.6: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4904 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:01:27.04 -23:06:11.8: 13.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:58:16.50 -23:40:09.5: 14.39 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:31:39.13 -29:45:12.1: 14.25 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:09:18.49 -25:50:41.0: 13.53 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:02:25.33 -27:21:38.3: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:09:18.49 -25:50:41.0: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4117 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:55:14.27 -22:29:40.1: 13.52 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:55:14.27 -22:29:40.1: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6860 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:58:16.50 -23:40:09.5: 14.40 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:01:27.04 -23:06:11.8: 13.41 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:58:16.50 -23:40:09.5: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.5465 delta=0.84 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:01:27.04 -23:06:11.8: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5335 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:31:39.13 -29:45:12.1: 14.17 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:31:39.13 -29:45:12.1: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7830 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:02:25.33 -27:21:38.3: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:05:06.48 -26:48:24.2: 14.12 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:14:36.02 -30:08:28.0: 14.28 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:30:21.23 -29:47:16.1: 14.29 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:05:06.48 -26:48:24.2: 14.15 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:05:06.48 -26:48:24.2: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4941 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:28:29.04 -29:36:41.3: 14.14 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:33.24 -27:24:54.5: 15.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:14:36.02 -30:08:28.0: 14.33 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:30:21.23 -29:47:16.1: 14.38 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:14:36.02 -30:08:28.0: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8472 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:21.23 -29:47:16.1: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8763 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:16:30.31 -28:16:28.9: 14.22 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:28:29.04 -29:36:41.3: 14.00 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:02:12.07 -22:12:10.1: 14.04 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:28:29.04 -29:36:41.3: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8893 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:59:33.24 -27:24:54.5: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:01:37.83 -28:07:58.7: 14.17 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:16:30.31 -28:16:28.9: 13.95 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:02:12.07 -22:12:10.1: 14.08 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:16:30.31 -28:16:28.9: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8877 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:02:12.07 -22:12:10.1: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9338 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:26:36.83 -27:07:59.4: 14.17 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:22:57.10 -24:44:22.6: 14.40 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:23:21.42 -23:01:37.0: 14.82 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:01:37.83 -28:07:58.7: 14.31 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:01:37.83 -28:07:58.7: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8768 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:26:36.83 -27:07:59.4: 14.21 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:22:57.10 -24:44:22.6: 14.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:36.83 -27:07:59.4: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8153 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:22:57.10 -24:44:22.6: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1381 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:13:02.15 -22:24:00.3: 14.11 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:14.58 -22:47:34.8: 13.99 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:23:21.42 -23:01:37.0: 14.82 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:21.42 -23:01:37.0: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.1268 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:20:21.25 -29:45:19.5: 14.11 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:59:14.58 -22:47:34.8: 13.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:14.58 -22:47:34.8: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0326 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:13:02.15 -22:24:00.3: 14.44 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:13:02.15 -22:24:00.3: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9556 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:25:43.29 -25:32:08.7: 14.63 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:20:18.31 -24:58:11.0: 14.62 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:20:21.25 -29:45:19.5: 14.32 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:17:28.33 -29:21:00.9: 14.15 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:21.25 -29:45:19.5: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0258 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:25:43.29 -25:32:08.7: 14.41 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:20:18.31 -24:58:11.0: 14.53 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:25:43.29 -25:32:08.7: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.1623 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:18.31 -24:58:11.0: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.0143 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:57:49.48 -22:45:26.1: 14.35 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:18:13.24 -27:24:59.0: 14.01 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:17:28.33 -29:21:00.9: 14.40 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:17:28.33 -29:21:00.9: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9923 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:18:13.24 -27:24:59.0: 14.08 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:57:49.48 -22:45:26.1: 14.20 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:18:13.24 -27:24:59.0: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1194 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:05:36.28 -24:35:14.5: 14.28 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:57:49.48 -22:45:26.1: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0119 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:05:36.28 -24:35:14.5: 14.31 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:05:36.28 -24:35:14.5: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0721 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out163282.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out170515.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out173559.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out174648.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161262_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161262_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161271_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161271_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161281_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161281_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161299_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161299_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161306_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161306_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161308_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161308_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161309_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161309_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161311_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161311_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161312_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161312_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161315_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161315_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161322_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161322_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:29:42.27 -26:48:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161329_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161329_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:10.87 -27:38:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161332_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161332_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161337_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161337_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161347_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161347_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161348_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161348_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161350_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161350_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161353_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161353_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161359_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161359_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161364_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161364_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:27:21.61 -26:08:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161365_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161365_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161368_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161368_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161375_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161375_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161380_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161380_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161382_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161382_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161385_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161385_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:24.87 -23:14:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161386_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161386_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161390_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161390_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:53.76 -29:49:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161391_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161391_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:28:32.93 -28:52:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161392_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161392_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161564_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 161564_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:00.39 -22:51:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162477_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 162477_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:06.27 -22:42:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163282_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 163282_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164536_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 164536_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165271_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 165271_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:37.57 -22:17:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165637_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 165637_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:09.09 -24:31:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166351_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 166351_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:59.96 -21:49:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166556_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 166556_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166681_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 166681_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:53.77 -22:42:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166949_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 166949_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167100_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 167100_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167607_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 167607_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:09.29 -23:24:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167955_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 167955_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:31.43 -29:54:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168100_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 168100_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168208_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 168208_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:22.70 -29:30:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168525_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 168525_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:54.99 -29:45:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168634_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 168634_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:59.33 -27:38:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168705_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 168705_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:43.65 -29:00:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168722_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 168722_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:01.23 -22:39:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168834_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 168834_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169091_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 169091_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169664_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 169664_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:31:59.68 -28:13:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170477_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 170477_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170479_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 170479_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:37.34 -22:27:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170515_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 170515_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170617_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 170617_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171222_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 171222_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:53.24 -25:12:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171225_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 171225_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:29:43.65 -25:06:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171303_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 171303_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:10.42 -22:54:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171967_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 171967_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172567_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 172567_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:30:50.27 -30:07:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172647_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 172647_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172708_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 172708_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:06.54 -26:53:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172928_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 172928_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173096_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 173096_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173097_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 173097_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173539_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 173539_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173559_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 173559_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173705_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 173705_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:45.25 -27:15:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173720_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 173720_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173810_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 173810_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:13.13 -28:11:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173889_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 173889_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:29.76 -24:20:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174303_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 174303_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174402_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 174402_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174541_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 174541_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174618_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 174618_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:28:22.83 -29:59:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174648_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 174648_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174775_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 174775_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:42.58 -26:23:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174845_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 174845_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175237_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 175237_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175272_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 175272_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175395_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 175395_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175421_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 175421_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175440_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 175440_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175468_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 175468_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175573_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 175573_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175589_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 175589_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175665_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 175665_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175683_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 175683_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175734_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 175734_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175790_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 175790_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175859_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 175859_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175872_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 175872_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156584_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 156584_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:20.86 -26:02:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156705_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 156705_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:50.45 -23:55:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156756_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033
The candidate 156756_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_01-31-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0033 did not pass the final checks