This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.2514 2461244.7514 9.17 20:44:06.76 -27:21:54.9
17.37720 -35.64196 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.324 Bamberga 2 1 2 9.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:44:06.76 -27:21:54.9: 14.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:44:06.76 -27:21:54.9: 14.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.2514* 20 44 06.76 -27 21 54.9 9.2 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.7514,9.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.2514 9.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.2514 2461244.7514 12.48 20:55:30.08 -25:09:08.6
20.88266 -37.51082 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 2.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.388 Charybdis 0 1 1 12.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:55:30.08 -25:09:08.6: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:55:30.08 -25:09:08.6: 14.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.2514* 20 55 30.08 -25 09 08.6 12.5 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.7514,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.2514 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.2514 2461244.7514 12.56 20:53:25.52 -29:59:36.1
14.79247 -38.25206 galactic Mic Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.769 Tatjana -0 1 1 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:53:25.52 -29:59:36.1: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:53:25.52 -29:59:36.1: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.2514* 20 53 25.52 -29 59 36.1 12.6 U Mic 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.7514,12.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.2514 12.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.2514 2461244.7514 13.40 20:55:10.73 -25:15:53.0
20.72131 -37.47145 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.325 Heidelberga 0 2 2 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:55:10.73 -25:15:53.0: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:55:10.73 -25:15:53.0: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.2514* 20 55 10.73 -25 15 53.0 13.4 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.7514,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.2514 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.82423715 17.06.2026 07:46:44.090 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
First image: 2461208.82423715 17.06.2026 07:46:44.090 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Last image: 2461244.75252100 23.07.2026 06:03:27.814 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4776
Objects passed selection criteria: 4776
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4478.25
Average stars matched: 4313.5 (96.3211 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113968 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 22 16:05:55 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-166-g55a66cb7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-22)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 23 01:09:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.82423715 17.06.2026 07:46:44.090 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
First image: 2461208.82423715 17.06.2026 07:46:44.090 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Last image: 2461244.75252100 23.07.2026 06:03:27.814 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 87
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.03
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 29 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 32685
Objects passed selection criteria: 32635
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 30004.2
Average stars matched: 28714.8 (95.7023 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 137552 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 22 16:05:55 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-166-g55a66cb7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-22)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 23 01:13:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461244.75024649
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:06:59.939 -25:59:26.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:03.242 -26:00:31.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:06:59.939 -25:59:26.19
Second-epoch image center 21:07:03.242 -26:00:31.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0220 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:02.915 -26:00:20.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:06:59.939 -25:59:26.19
Second-epoch image center 21:07:02.915 -26:00:20.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0188 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:07:03.242 -26:00:31.57
Second-epoch second image center 21:07:02.915 -26:00:20.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00323 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Qk7uRelHgS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vkbDo7K2a4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UmZBfJknfR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CKdacz4HCx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 4590 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7573 to 325.7549 deg, Dec -31.2624 to -20.5568 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7573 to 325.7549 deg, Dec -31.2624 to -20.5568 deg
Loaded 7064 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3816 out of 3873 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3873 out of 4590 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.451500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.451500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.11
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.11
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 4590 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7573 to 325.7549 deg, Dec -31.2624 to -20.5568 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7573 to 325.7549 deg, Dec -31.2624 to -20.5568 deg
Loaded 7064 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3816 out of 3873 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3873 out of 4590 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 4645 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7571 to 325.7547 deg, Dec -31.2444 to -20.5156 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7571 to 325.7547 deg, Dec -31.2444 to -20.5156 deg
Loaded 7088 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3849 out of 3914 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3914 out of 4645 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
2.3 pix Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
3.8 pix fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
14.1 mag. Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Qk7uRelHgS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=305, bad_region=0, passed=4590
Got 4590 stars (including 4283 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4590 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4557 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4557 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4557 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=256 n_q2=224 n_q3=252 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vkbDo7K2a4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=311, bad_region=0, passed=4645
Got 4645 stars (including 4327 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4645 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4600 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4600 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.506 n_q1=251 n_q2=224 n_q3=259 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UmZBfJknfR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=235, bad_region=0, passed=4418
Got 4418 stars (including 4179 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4418 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4369 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4369 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=251 n_q2=195 n_q3=290 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.084
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CKdacz4HCx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=314, bad_region=0, passed=4357
Got 4357 stars (including 4038 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4357 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4283 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4283 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4283 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=270 n_q2=207 n_q3=274 n_q4=211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.052
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits sigma_overall=0.418 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits sigma_overall=0.436 worst_q_ratio=1.160
new1=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits sigma_overall=0.338 worst_q_ratio=1.084
new2=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.052
reference average sigma_overall=0.427 worst_q_ratio=1.1975
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178_astrometric_residuals.png (957 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:40:46.10 -27:35:31.0: 11.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:41:20.97 -22:31:48.9: 11.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:05:27.29 -24:06:36.5: 11.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:44:06.76 -27:21:54.9: 14.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:01:25.82 -23:03:16.1: 11.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:43:47.21 -22:28:56.2: 10.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:40:46.10 -27:35:31.0: 11.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:46.10 -27:35:31.0: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2156 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:05:27.29 -24:06:36.5: 11.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:27.29 -24:06:36.5: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0966 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:01:25.82 -23:03:16.1: 11.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:41:20.97 -22:31:48.9: 11.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:25.82 -23:03:16.1: ref_mag=11.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1229 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:20.97 -22:31:48.9: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4469 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:44:06.76 -27:21:54.9: 14.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:43:47.21 -22:28:56.2: 10.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:47.21 -22:28:56.2: ref_mag=10.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0041 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20289.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20272_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20272_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20289_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 20289_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20319_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20319_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:54:26.47 -27:44:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20356_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20356_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20372_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20372_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20395_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20395_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20408_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20408_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 13s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:44:06.76 -27:21:54.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:06:59.939 -25:59:26.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:03.242 -26:00:31.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:06:59.939 -25:59:26.19
Second-epoch image center 21:07:03.242 -26:00:31.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0220 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:02.915 -26:00:20.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:06:59.939 -25:59:26.19
Second-epoch image center 21:07:02.915 -26:00:20.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0188 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:07:03.242 -26:00:31.57
Second-epoch second image center 21:07:02.915 -26:00:20.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00323 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SDK3eKcrfA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qgHm4vrnqZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KKflQ7X3jC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7Jr5JO4EXk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32517 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7104 to 325.8372 deg, Dec -31.2627 to -20.5198 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7104 to 325.8372 deg, Dec -31.2627 to -20.5198 deg
Loaded 7143 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5715 out of 6003 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6003 out of 32517 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.294600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.294600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.03
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.26
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32517 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7104 to 325.8372 deg, Dec -31.2627 to -20.5198 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7104 to 325.8372 deg, Dec -31.2627 to -20.5198 deg
Loaded 7143 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5715 out of 6003 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6003 out of 32517 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 32635 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7102 to 325.8938 deg, Dec -31.2487 to -20.4986 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7102 to 325.8938 deg, Dec -31.2487 to -20.4986 deg
Loaded 7165 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5705 out of 6017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6017 out of 32635 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 71 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
2.2 pix Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
3.4 pix fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
14.3 mag. Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.SDK3eKcrfA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1030, bad_region=1, passed=32508
Got 32508 stars (including 31426 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32508 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=259 n_q2=214 n_q3=245 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.209
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qgHm4vrnqZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1093, bad_region=0, passed=32625
Got 32625 stars (including 31496 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32625 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.479 n_q1=256 n_q2=216 n_q3=248 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.111
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KKflQ7X3jC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=838, bad_region=2, passed=23665
Got 23665 stars (including 22799 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23665 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23431 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23431 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=234 n_q2=184 n_q3=302 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.092
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7Jr5JO4EXk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=914, bad_region=1, passed=32042
Got 32042 stars (including 31077 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32042 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=268 n_q2=205 n_q3=270 n_q4=218 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.058
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-00-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_010402_TTUQ1b1x1_945652_tVjlwvSl/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:36:46.52 -23:39:06.2: 13.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:37:13.31 -21:27:50.1: 12.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:39:48.42 -24:56:53.2: 12.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:40:11.64 -23:03:06.1: 12.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:55:30.08 -25:09:08.6: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:38:52.01 -30:13:50.7: 12.28 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:09:56.82 -30:21:33.4: 12.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:39:59.45 -30:56:28.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:36:46.52 -23:39:06.2: 13.75 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:46.52 -23:39:06.2: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4804 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:40:11.64 -23:03:06.1: 12.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:37:13.31 -21:27:50.1: 12.63 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:11.64 -23:03:06.1: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6508 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:39:48.42 -24:56:53.2: 12.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:37:13.31 -21:27:50.1: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7856 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:39:48.42 -24:56:53.2: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6685 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:39:46.70 -30:20:32.4: 13.44 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:53:25.52 -29:59:36.1: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:55:30.08 -25:09:08.6: 14.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:38:52.01 -30:13:50.7: 12.28 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:38:52.01 -30:13:50.7: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.1649 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:39:59.45 -30:56:28.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:39:59.45 -30:56:28.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:09:56.82 -30:21:33.4: 12.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:09:56.82 -30:21:33.4: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3311 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:39:46.70 -30:20:32.4: 13.20 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:39:46.70 -30:20:32.4: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.5852 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:53:25.52 -29:59:36.1: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:41:19.02 -30:39:56.0: 13.18 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:39:41.57 -30:12:03.5: 13.44 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:45:28.52 -22:36:55.4: 13.54 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:46:04.49 -25:06:37.6: 13.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:37:56.02 -27:45:28.6: 13.36 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:39:56.22 -29:08:24.9: 13.36 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:40:23.90 -29:38:42.6: 13.33 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:39:41.57 -30:12:03.5: 13.43 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:41:19.02 -30:39:56.0: 12.97 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:39:41.57 -30:12:03.5: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.8520 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:41:19.02 -30:39:56.0: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.7528 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:34:18.65 -22:47:42.2: 13.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:45:28.52 -22:36:55.4: 13.53 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:28.52 -22:36:55.4: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4161 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:46:04.49 -25:06:37.6: 13.26 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:04.49 -25:06:37.6: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2428 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:37:56.02 -27:45:28.6: 13.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:37:56.02 -27:45:28.6: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.1047 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:39:56.22 -29:08:24.9: 14.04 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:40:23.90 -29:38:42.6: 13.51 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:39:56.22 -29:08:24.9: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.0702 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:40:23.90 -29:38:42.6: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.9382 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:34:18.65 -22:47:42.2: 13.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:18.65 -22:47:42.2: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5445 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:41:05.27 -23:50:54.2: 13.41 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:39:50.50 -20:54:02.0: 13.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:33:55.43 -30:24:29.6: 13.29 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:39:31.85 -25:32:33.3: 13.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:37:44.47 -22:15:51.9: 13.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:37:42.51 -21:12:35.5: 13.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:41:05.27 -23:50:54.2: 13.66 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:40:27.19 -27:50:18.9: 13.43 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:39:50.50 -20:54:02.0: 13.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:41:05.27 -23:50:54.2: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3275 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:50.50 -20:54:02.0: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6416 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:37:58.61 -21:59:23.4: 13.80 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:33:55.43 -30:24:29.6: 13.35 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:39:31.85 -25:32:33.3: 13.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:33:55.43 -30:24:29.6: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.0713 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:39:31.85 -25:32:33.3: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2904 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:37:44.47 -22:15:51.9: 13.97 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:44.47 -22:15:51.9: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6009 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:40:27.19 -27:50:18.9: 13.36 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:37:42.51 -21:12:35.5: 13.81 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:40:27.19 -27:50:18.9: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.0734 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:37:42.51 -21:12:35.5: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3750 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:37:58.61 -21:59:23.4: 13.81 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:58.61 -21:59:23.4: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6521 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:55:10.73 -25:15:53.0: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:35:24.39 -28:00:01.8: 13.87 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:37:47.62 -25:58:23.4: 13.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:40:06.74 -28:39:18.1: 13.53 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:35:48.84 -25:44:16.3: 13.56 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:34:22.86 -23:38:43.7: 13.97 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:55:10.73 -25:15:53.0: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:35:24.39 -28:00:01.8: 13.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:35:24.39 -28:00:01.8: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.3326 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:39:10.58 -22:12:46.8: 13.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:40:06.74 -28:39:18.1: 13.56 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:40:06.74 -28:39:18.1: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.1496 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:35:48.84 -25:44:16.3: 13.44 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:35:48.84 -25:44:16.3: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.3724 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:34:22.86 -23:38:43.7: 13.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:22.86 -23:38:43.7: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5840 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:37:47.62 -25:58:23.4: 13.59 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:39:10.58 -22:12:46.8: 13.66 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:37:47.62 -25:58:23.4: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.3101 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:39:10.58 -22:12:46.8: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4258 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:36:49.32 -23:48:46.6: 13.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:36:49.32 -23:48:46.6: 14.29 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:49.32 -23:48:46.6: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6654 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:38:45.61 -20:41:31.3: 13.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:39:39.80 -21:21:48.9: 13.47 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:38:45.61 -20:41:31.3: 13.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:45.61 -20:41:31.3: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6942 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:37:07.93 -20:39:27.5: 14.36 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:32:06.49 -30:52:38.7: 13.77 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:38:21.88 -26:12:10.7: 13.40 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:37:30.66 -21:56:38.7: 13.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:39:39.80 -21:21:48.9: 13.61 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:39:39.80 -21:21:48.9: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4244 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:32:06.49 -30:52:38.7: 13.50 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:32:06.49 -30:52:38.7: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.1468 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:38:21.88 -26:12:10.7: 13.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:37:07.93 -20:39:27.5: 14.65 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:38:21.88 -26:12:10.7: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.3440 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:37:30.66 -21:56:38.7: 13.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:07.93 -20:39:27.5: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.7224 delta=0.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:37:30.66 -21:56:38.7: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6538 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:45:10.31 -21:32:04.6: 14.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:53:38.18 -20:54:39.8: 14.00 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:45:10.31 -21:32:04.6: 14.12 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:36:09.36 -21:02:31.3: 13.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:10.31 -21:32:04.6: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9094 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:53:38.18 -20:54:39.8: 14.38 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:38.18 -20:54:39.8: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8518 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:00:23.46 -23:13:29.0: 14.29 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:38:38.85 -23:19:39.5: 14.03 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:36:09.36 -21:02:31.3: 13.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:42:32.59 -21:28:06.5: 14.15 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:09.36 -21:02:31.3: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6606 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:00:23.46 -23:13:29.0: 14.01 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:23.46 -23:13:29.0: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7013 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:38:38.85 -23:19:39.5: 14.03 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:38:38.85 -23:19:39.5: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7368 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:28:42.86 -27:55:55.4: 13.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:42:32.59 -21:28:06.5: 14.57 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:32.59 -21:28:06.5: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.6881 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:52:43.76 -21:52:02.7: 14.15 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:33:38.56 -28:17:46.1: 13.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:28:42.86 -27:55:55.4: 13.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:28:42.86 -27:55:55.4: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6127 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:39:32.20 -24:13:13.2: 13.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:33:38.56 -28:17:46.1: 13.89 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:33:38.56 -28:17:46.1: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5393 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:52:43.76 -21:52:02.7: 14.39 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:43.76 -21:52:02.7: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.9358 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:35:20.42 -22:37:12.3: 14.27 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:38:27.15 -23:10:40.6: 13.99 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:39:32.20 -24:13:13.2: 13.97 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:39:32.20 -24:13:13.2: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5982 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:42:50.73 -24:26:14.0: 14.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:35:20.42 -22:37:12.3: 14.09 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:35:20.42 -22:37:12.3: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.7848 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:38:27.15 -23:10:40.6: 13.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:38:27.15 -23:10:40.6: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6526 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:18:05.91 -25:48:46.2: 13.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:42:50.73 -24:26:14.0: 14.52 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:50.73 -24:26:14.0: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8790 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:18:05.91 -25:48:46.2: 14.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:18:05.91 -25:48:46.2: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6860 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52980.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53098.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53329.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52630_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52630_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52634_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52634_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52637_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52637_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52640_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52640_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52658_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52658_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:06.77 -27:21:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52794_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52794_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52807_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52807_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52815_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52815_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52854_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52854_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52861_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52861_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52948_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52948_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52980_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 52980_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52999_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52999_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53017_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53017_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:40:21.01 -30:36:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53064_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53064_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53065_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53065_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53074_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53074_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53098_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 53098_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53104_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53104_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:37:57.93 -25:06:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53158_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53158_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53167_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53167_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53169_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53169_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53178_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53178_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53194_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53194_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53199_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53199_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53242_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53242_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53256_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53256_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53260_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53260_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53262_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53262_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53266_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53266_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53285_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53285_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53286_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53286_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53293_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53293_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53294_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53294_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53315_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53315_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53317_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53317_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53319_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53319_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53327_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53327_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53329_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 53329_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53333_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53333_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53334_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53334_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53343_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53343_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53346_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53346_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53351_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53351_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53352_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53352_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53355_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53355_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53356_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53356_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53362_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53362_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53365_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53365_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53375_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53375_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53386_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53386_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53402_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53402_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53410_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53410_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53411_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53411_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53416_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53416_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53422_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53422_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53423_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53423_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53434_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53434_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53437_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53437_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53438_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53438_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53439_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53439_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53447_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53447_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53450_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53450_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53456_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53456_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53469_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53469_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53471_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53471_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53477_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53477_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02741_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 02741_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:26:43.99 -29:51:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08641_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 08641_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:54:26.46 -27:44:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05198_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 05198_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:03.06 -28:47:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20489_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20489_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-03-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks