Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 22.4528  2461243.9528  11.98  00:01:34.41 -13:59:37.0
 78.92016 -72.45472 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
23 Thalia                  -0     -0       0  12.3     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:01:34.41 -13:59:37.0:  14.80 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:01:34.41 -13:59:37.0:  14.46 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits


fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits


fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits -crosshair 4549.02246 765.41632 image    wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits -crosshair 4543.85840 768.06567 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 07 22.45280 00 01 34.41 -13 59 37.0          12.0 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 07 22.45257 00 01 34.40 -13 59 36.7          12.0 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 07 22.45304 00 01 34.42 -13 59 37.3          12.0 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 07 22.4528*  00 01 34.41 -13 59 37.0  12.0 U             Cet       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9528,11.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4528 11.98CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 22.4528  2461243.9528  13.04  00:05:12.22 -13:55:21.4
 81.38638 -72.94781 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
259 Aletheia                 0      1       1  13.0    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:05:12.22 -13:55:21.4:  14.75 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:05:12.22 -13:55:21.4:  14.47 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits


fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits


fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits -crosshair 4014.65918 725.87280 image    wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits -crosshair 4009.43970 728.32318 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 07 22.45280 00 05 12.22 -13 55 21.4          13.0 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 07 22.45257 00 05 12.21 -13 55 21.8          13.0 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 07 22.45304 00 05 12.23 -13 55 20.9          13.1 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 07 22.4528*  00 05 12.22 -13 55 21.4  13.0 U             Cet       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9528,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4528 13.04CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461211.90406485 20.06.2026 09:41:41.203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
First image: 2461211.90406485 20.06.2026 09:41:41.203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Last  image: 2461243.95303713 22.07.2026 10:52:12.408   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  2331
Objects passed selection criteria:  2327
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 1801
Average stars matched: 1602.75 (88.9922 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   112016 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Jul 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-162-g0b3e9b13
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Wed Jul 22 06:13:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461211.90406485 20.06.2026 09:41:41.203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
First image: 2461211.90406485 20.06.2026 09:41:41.203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Last  image: 2461243.95303713 22.07.2026 10:52:12.408   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 87
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.00
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  14769
Objects passed selection criteria:  14741
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 11809.2
Average stars matched: 10448.2 (88.4751 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   121876 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Jul 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-162-g0b3e9b13
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Wed Jul 22 06:16:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-09-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-09-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 993325 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 993325 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits_preview.png'

Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits


renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits_preview.png'

Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2282.0439
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 562.6765
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3106.4205
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 696.9667
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3297.9336
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 726.0973
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.36124
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.040
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     20.6900005340576 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 21.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-22T05:51:31.9260047' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-22T10:51:31.9260047' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61243.4524528473 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-22T10:51:41.8274818' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61243.4525674423 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.995936481881 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -17.9999829176145 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     38.3966666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     181.067777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.60758526469937 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20450 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20450 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     20.6900005340576 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     20.6900005340576 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 14.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 65.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               902.51 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 21.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 31.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=                  0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =                  0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits :)

Spent 0.780347 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 33794.829350
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21727.0, right_median=27156.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =                 20.5 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 21.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-22T05:52:12.4080725' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-22T10:52:12.4080725' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61243.4529213887 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-22T10:52:22.3087064' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61243.4530359721 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =      359.99593642885 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -17.9999829329823 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     38.3936111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     181.270833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.60769293047635 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20450 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20450 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =                 20.5 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=                 20.5 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 14.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 65.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               902.51 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 21.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 31.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=                  0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =                  0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits :)

Spent 0.832045 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 33794.829350
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21727.0, right_median=27156.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits



fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461243.95256859
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits'
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.5'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:56.820 -18:00:11.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.648 -18:00:28.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:56.820 -18:00:11.64
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.648 -18:00:28.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0121 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:57.553 -18:00:12.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:56.820 -18:00:11.64
Second-epoch image center 23:59:57.553 -18:00:12.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0029 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  23:59:59.648 -18:00:28.17
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:57.553 -18:00:12.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00931 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.biOlvDADpY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hXEvYqxub8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LXN46o3SHn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vNuQdkh0FQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 2302 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0042 to 359.9883 deg, Dec -23.2538 to -12.6277 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0042 to 359.9883 deg, Dec -23.2538 to -12.6277 deg
Loaded 190804 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1878 out of 1902 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 1902 out of 2302 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.281200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.281200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  13.98

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  13.98

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 2302 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0042 to 359.9883 deg, Dec -23.2538 to -12.6277 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0042 to 359.9883 deg, Dec -23.2538 to -12.6277 deg
Loaded 190804 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1878 out of 1902 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 1902 out of 2302 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 1693 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0054 to 359.9884 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6278 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0054 to 359.9884 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6278 deg
Loaded 190803 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1325 out of 1343 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 1343 out of 1693 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.3 pix  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
 2.3 pix  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
 2.3 pix  wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
 2.3 pix  wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.0 mag.  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
 13.7 mag.  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
 14.3 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
 14.3 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.3 (SNR )  10.7 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.biOlvDADpY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=176, bad_region=441, passed=2298
Got 2298 stars (including 1705 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2298 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5850 through 0 to 8.4070, gap 8.4070 to 351.5850
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5847 through 0 to 8.4071, gap 8.4071 to 351.5847
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.407 n_q1=307 n_q2=162 n_q3=315 n_q4=169 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.076
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hXEvYqxub8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=152, bad_region=292, passed=1693
Got 1693 stars (including 1266 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1693 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5851 through 0 to 8.3971, gap 8.3971 to 351.5851
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5848 through 0 to 8.3973, gap 8.3973 to 351.5848
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.358 n_q1=309 n_q2=147 n_q3=337 n_q4=163 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.081
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LXN46o3SHn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=216, bad_region=651, passed=2692
Got 2692 stars (including 1857 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2692 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5953 through 0 to 8.4400, gap 8.4400 to 351.5953
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5958 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5958
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2115 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2115 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=291 n_q2=196 n_q3=279 n_q4=181 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.028
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vNuQdkh0FQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=253, bad_region=627, passed=2621
Got 2621 stars (including 1780 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2621 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5955 through 0 to 8.4403, gap 8.4403 to 351.5955
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5958 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5958
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.358 n_q1=294 n_q2=195 n_q3=278 n_q4=181 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits sigma_overall=0.378 worst_q_ratio=1.076
ref2=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits sigma_overall=0.420 worst_q_ratio=1.081
new1=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.028
new2=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.095
reference average sigma_overall=0.399 worst_q_ratio=1.0785
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518_astrometric_residuals.png (947 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519_astrometric_residuals.png (948 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.5'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:56.820 -18:00:11.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.648 -18:00:28.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:56.820 -18:00:11.64
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.648 -18:00:28.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0121 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:57.553 -18:00:12.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:56.820 -18:00:11.64
Second-epoch image center 23:59:57.553 -18:00:12.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0029 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  23:59:59.648 -18:00:28.17
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:57.553 -18:00:12.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00931 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aEMo4R3T6i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ltN2FrxJ2t
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VPwF5miIKC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7tuAGTNC4b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13800 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0008 to 359.9990 deg, Dec -23.2779 to -12.6004 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0008 to 359.9990 deg, Dec -23.2779 to -12.6004 deg
Loaded 191688 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3376 out of 3471 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3471 out of 13800 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.127450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.127450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.00
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.13

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.13

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13800 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0008 to 359.9990 deg, Dec -23.2779 to -12.6004 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0008 to 359.9990 deg, Dec -23.2779 to -12.6004 deg
Loaded 191688 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3376 out of 3471 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3471 out of 13800 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 11523 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0007 to 359.9972 deg, Dec -23.2771 to -12.5847 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0007 to 359.9972 deg, Dec -23.2771 to -12.5847 deg
Loaded 191948 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3404 out of 3475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3475 out of 11523 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 38 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
 2.1 pix  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.1 mag.  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
 13.8 mag.  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
 14.4 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
 14.3 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.3 (SNR )  13.4 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.aEMo4R3T6i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=454, bad_region=1822, passed=13796
Got 13796 stars (including 11610 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13796 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5849 through 0 to 8.4418, gap 8.4418 to 351.5849
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5847 through 0 to 8.4420, gap 8.4420 to 351.5847
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12110 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.404 n_q1=308 n_q2=155 n_q3=318 n_q4=168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.051
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ltN2FrxJ2t (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=313, bad_region=1652, passed=11521
Got 11521 stars (including 9599 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11521 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5851 through 0 to 8.4395, gap 8.4395 to 351.5851
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5848 through 0 to 8.4397, gap 8.4397 to 351.5848
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=316 n_q2=148 n_q3=324 n_q4=164 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VPwF5miIKC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=509, bad_region=2749, passed=15685
Got 15685 stars (including 12572 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15685 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5852 through 0 to 8.4400, gap 8.4400 to 351.5852
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13337 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5857 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5857
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.379 n_q1=296 n_q2=192 n_q3=280 n_q4=177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.057
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7tuAGTNC4b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=534, bad_region=2689, passed=15469
Got 15469 stars (including 12372 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15469 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5841 through 0 to 8.4403, gap 8.4403 to 351.5841
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5845 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5845
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=296 n_q2=194 n_q3=281 n_q4=173 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.030
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:12:35.51 -17:15:08.9:  13.23 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:17:18.28 -22:03:46.3:  13.45 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:17:34.35 -21:22:19.9:  13.70 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:13:20.05 -21:37:29.8:  13.71 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:16:46.47 -21:06:44.0:  13.50 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:01:34.41 -13:59:37.0:  14.80 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:17:57.35 -19:41:30.1:  13.40 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:13:33.32 -21:18:30.7:  13.35 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:05:12.22 -13:55:21.4:  14.75 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:14:39.34 -22:11:23.3:  13.47 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:17:18.28 -22:03:46.3:  13.31 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:12:35.51 -17:15:08.9:  13.47 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:17:34.35 -21:22:19.9:  13.48 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.38 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:16:46.47 -21:06:44.0:  13.55 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.59 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.29 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:18.28 -22:03:46.3: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.1511 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:12:35.51 -17:15:08.9: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.3844 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:34.35 -21:22:19.9: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3422 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:01:34.41 -13:59:37.0:  14.46 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:13:20.05 -21:37:29.8:  14.11 +/- 0.31  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.52 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:14:39.34 -22:11:23.3:  14.08 +/- 0.31  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:16:46.47 -21:06:44.0: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.3461 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:17:57.35 -19:41:30.1:  13.29 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.80 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:05:12.22 -13:55:21.4:  14.47 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:20.05 -21:37:29.8: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.4855 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.58 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:14:39.34 -22:11:23.3: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.2027 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:13:33.32 -21:18:30.7:  13.64 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.35 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:57.35 -19:41:30.1: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.3287 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.43 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:33.32 -21:18:30.7: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4933 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:15:12.62 -21:43:15.1:  13.55 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:19:06.98 -21:53:16.7:  13.73 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:18:43.25 -21:14:23.6:  13.76 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:18:14.20 -20:41:35.1:  13.81 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:15:05.57 -21:09:58.1:  14.10 +/- 0.24  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:15:15.57 -21:42:00.0:  13.63 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:18:28.76 -22:12:01.3:  13.98 +/- 0.25  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:05:27.22 -21:48:48.0:  13.32 +/- 0.11  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:15:12.62 -21:43:15.1:  13.77 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:18:43.25 -21:14:23.6:  13.78 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:15:15.57 -21:42:00.0:  13.82 +/- 0.25  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.77 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.62 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:43.25 -21:14:23.6: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6034 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:12.62 -21:43:15.1: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5162 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.69 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:15.57 -21:42:00.0: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6115 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:05:27.22 -21:48:48.0:  13.59 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:15:05.57 -21:09:58.1:  13.80 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.39 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:05:27.22 -21:48:48.0: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5240 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.94 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:05.57 -21:09:58.1: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.6338 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:19:06.98 -21:53:16.7:  13.87 +/- 0.26  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:18:28.76 -22:12:01.3:  13.77 +/- 0.25  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.78 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:19:06.98 -21:53:16.7: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6061 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.87 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:28.76 -22:12:01.3: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.6950 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:18:14.20 -20:41:35.1:  13.78 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.79 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:14.20 -20:41:35.1: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5978 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:09:58.53 -21:57:44.0:  13.92 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:15:00.52 -21:29:01.8:  14.14 +/- 0.25  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:18:49.34 -21:54:54.8:  13.54 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:11:59.94 -20:21:30.8:  13.69 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:16:32.10 -19:11:01.4:  13.89 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:07:36.25 -21:22:00.7:  13.79 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:15:00.52 -21:29:01.8:  13.52 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:12:36.50 -21:57:54.6:  13.55 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.73 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:00.52 -21:29:01.8: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.5292 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:09:58.53 -21:57:44.0:  13.83 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.88 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:09:58.53 -21:57:44.0: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.5292 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:16:55.92 -20:23:36.6:  13.59 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:18:49.34 -21:54:54.8:  13.51 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.52 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:49.34 -21:54:54.8: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7131 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:16:32.10 -19:11:01.4:  13.70 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.80 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:16:32.10 -19:11:01.4: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5653 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:11:59.94 -20:21:30.8:  14.32 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.69 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:12:36.50 -21:57:54.6:  13.94 +/- 0.27  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:11:59.94 -20:21:30.8: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.5322 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:16:55.92 -20:23:36.6:  13.91 +/- 0.26  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.67 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.64 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:16:55.92 -20:23:36.6: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6802 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:12:36.50 -21:57:54.6: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5263 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:12:00.16 -21:45:23.7:  13.57 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:07:36.25 -21:22:00.7:  13.86 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:16:39.19 -21:07:25.5:  13.74 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.82 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:07:36.25 -21:22:00.7: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6882 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:00:16.77 -22:11:02.4:  13.66 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:12:00.16 -21:45:23.7:  13.79 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.63 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:12:00.16 -21:45:23.7: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6475 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:10:34.97 -19:54:24.9:  13.90 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:11:44.24 -17:14:28.1:  13.54 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:16:39.19 -21:07:25.5:  14.26 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.74 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:16:39.19 -21:07:25.5: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.8009 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:18:18.32 -16:02:26.1:  13.70 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:00:16.77 -22:11:02.4:  13.61 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:08:31.55 -20:23:22.3:  13.64 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.64 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:16.77 -22:11:02.4: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6676 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 23:58:56.30 -21:12:22.4:  13.86 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:11:44.24 -17:14:28.1:  13.52 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.53 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:11:44.24 -17:14:28.1: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5359 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:18:18.32 -16:02:26.1:  13.98 +/- 0.25  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:10:34.97 -19:54:24.9:  13.45 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.78 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:18.32 -16:02:26.1: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6969 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.63 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:10:34.97 -19:54:24.9: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6245 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:08:31.55 -20:23:22.3:  13.69 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.65 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:08:31.55 -20:23:22.3: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5299 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 23:58:56.30 -21:12:22.4:  13.90 +/- 0.24  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.88 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:58:56.30 -21:12:22.4: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6674 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:00:35.16 -22:11:37.4:  13.95 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 23:46:34.95 -21:04:39.0:  13.99 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 23:41:41.44 -15:59:02.4:  13.95 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:00:35.16 -22:11:37.4:  13.47 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.67 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:35.16 -22:11:37.4: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7588 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 23:46:34.95 -21:04:39.0:  13.68 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.84 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:46:34.95 -21:04:39.0: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6462 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 23:41:41.44 -15:59:02.4:  13.80 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.89 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:41:41.44 -15:59:02.4: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6795 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21047.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21858.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20254_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 20254_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.34    00:12:35.51 -17:15:08.6   2968 2760   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.44    00:12:35.50 -17:15:09.3   2963 2762   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20256_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 20256_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.33    00:17:57.32 -19:41:30.0   2231 4256   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.33    00:17:57.37 -19:41:30.2   2225 4259   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21047_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
Preparing report for the candidate 21047_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21647_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 21647_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.11    00:17:18.30 -22:03:46.4   2361 5695   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.20    00:17:18.27 -22:03:46.3   2356 5698   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21858_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
Preparing report for the candidate 21858_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21894_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 21894_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.30    00:16:46.44 -21:06:43.6   2422 5113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.40    00:16:46.50 -21:06:44.4   2417 5116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21900_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 21900_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.31    00:14:39.34 -22:11:23.2   2737 5761   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.12    00:14:39.33 -22:11:23.4   2732 5763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21953_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 21953_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.35    00:17:34.37 -21:22:19.8   2312 5275   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.33    00:17:34.33 -21:22:19.9   2308 5278   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22042_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22042_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.43    00:13:20.01 -21:37:29.8   2916 5411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.59    00:13:20.09 -21:37:29.7   2911 5414   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22151_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22151_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.46    00:13:33.31 -21:18:30.5   2881 5220   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.53    00:13:33.33 -21:18:30.8   2876 5223   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22158_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22158_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.51    00:15:12.63 -21:43:15.6   2652 5477   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.52    00:15:12.61 -21:43:14.6   2647 5480   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22159_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22159_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.51    00:18:43.27 -21:14:23.5   2147 5200   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.75    00:18:43.23 -21:14:23.8   2142 5203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22182_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22182_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.54    00:19:06.99 -21:53:16.5   2102 5597   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.69    00:19:06.97 -21:53:16.9   2097 5600   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22186_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22186_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.52    00:15:15.61 -21:41:59.5   2645 5465   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.77    00:15:15.52 -21:42:00.5   2640 5467   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22227_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22227_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.57    00:18:14.17 -20:41:35.0   2207 4865   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.64    00:18:14.22 -20:41:35.3   2202 4868   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22243_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22243_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.54    00:15:05.59 -21:09:58.2   2661 5139   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.80    00:15:05.56 -21:09:57.9   2656 5142   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22268_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22268_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.61    00:18:28.75 -22:12:00.6   2197 5785   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.81    00:18:28.77 -22:12:02.0   2192 5787   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22274_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22274_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.50    00:05:27.30 -21:48:47.9   4029 5504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.55    00:05:27.14 -21:48:48.2   4024 5507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22283_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22283_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.53    00:09:58.53 -21:57:44.0   3394 5606   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.53    00:09:58.53 -21:57:44.0   3389 5608   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22295_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22295_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.54    00:11:59.97 -20:21:30.6   3090 4638   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.53    00:11:59.90 -20:21:30.9   3086 4640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22305_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22305_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.63    00:18:49.28 -21:54:55.6   2144 5612   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.83    00:18:49.41 -21:54:54.1   2139 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22312_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22312_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.57    00:16:32.09 -19:11:01.1   2426 3942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.56    00:16:32.11 -19:11:01.7   2421 3945   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22327_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22327_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.60    00:15:00.54 -21:29:01.9   2678 5332   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.47    00:15:00.51 -21:29:01.8   2673 5335   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22333_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22333_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.58    00:07:36.27 -21:22:00.5   3723 5237   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.96    00:07:36.23 -21:22:00.8   3718 5240   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22349_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22349_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.65    00:16:55.91 -20:23:36.9   2388 4678   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.73    00:16:55.92 -20:23:36.2   2383 4680   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22357_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22357_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.62    00:12:36.51 -21:57:55.0   3023 5616   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.46    00:12:36.49 -21:57:54.2   3018 5619   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22362_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22362_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.76    00:16:39.15 -21:07:25.7   2439 5120   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.93    00:16:39.23 -21:07:25.4   2434 5123   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22367_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22367_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.62    00:12:00.14 -21:45:23.3   3106 5487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.68    00:12:00.18 -21:45:24.1   3101 5490   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22373_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22373_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.56    00:00:16.80 -22:11:02.7   4758 5724   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.90    00:00:16.75 -22:11:02.1   4753 5726   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22387_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22387_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.58    00:10:34.95 -19:54:25.3   3287 4360   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.68    00:10:35.00 -19:54:24.5   3282 4363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22405_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22405_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.64    00:18:18.29 -16:02:26.4   2118 2044   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.84    00:18:18.35 -16:02:25.8   2113 2046   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22408_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22408_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.54    00:11:44.32 -17:14:27.9   3091 2750   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.53    00:11:44.17 -17:14:28.3   3087 2753   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22495_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22495_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.63    00:08:31.56 -20:23:22.2   3584 4647   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.46    00:08:31.54 -20:23:22.4   3579 4650   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22520_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22520_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.60    23:58:56.34 -21:12:22.9   4945 5129   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.76    23:58:56.27 -21:12:21.9   4940 5132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22529_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22529_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.64    00:00:35.05 -22:11:36.7   4715 5730   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.99    00:00:35.26 -22:11:38.2   4710 5732   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22609_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 22609_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.55    23:46:34.95 -21:04:38.4   6692 5066   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.81    23:46:34.95 -21:04:39.5   6687 5068   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23115_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 23115_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 22.45257    2461243.95257    13.64    23:41:41.38 -15:59:01.6   7453 1991   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-51-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0518.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    13.73    23:41:41.50 -15:59:03.2   7447 1994   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12599_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519
The candidate 12599_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 07 22.45304    2461243.95304    8.81    23:43:49.90 -15:17:08.8   7142 1564   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_060809_TTUQ2b1x1_3679757_oN0GGRc9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-52-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0519.fits

**** FOUND  23:43:49.91 -15:17:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 14s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:01:34.41 -13:59:37.0
00:05:12.22 -13:55:21.4
########### Completed Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
00:01:34.41 -13:59:37.0
00:05:12.22 -13:55:21.4
###################################################################################
00:01:34.41 -13:59:37.0  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
00:05:12.22 -13:55:21.4  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461243.95256859 -observatory V36
07:07:28.67 +18:10:35.8 Mercury (2.5mag)
11:00:36.53 +07:06:60.0 Venus (-4.2mag)
05:00:01.63 +22:41:09.4 Mars (1.3mag)
08:27:42.55 +19:35:24.7 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:43.55 +03:22:18.4 Saturn (0.7mag)
04:09:23.20 +20:50:48.9 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:49.59 +00:18:43.2 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:29:46.13 -23:23:18.2 Pluto (14.4mag)
14:23:43.03 -19:52:30.0 Moon (-10.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul 22 06:13 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461243.95256859:
08:27:43.59 +19:35:22.6 Io (6.0mag)
08:27:48.34 +19:35:01.6 Europa (6.3mag)
08:27:34.18 +19:36:01.7 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:27:49.59 +19:35:02.1 Callisto (6.7mag)
08:25:43.69 +19:25:13.8 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:27:40.97 +19:35:31.8 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:25:05.89 +19:27:05.9 Elara (17.7mag)
08:31:34.34 +19:23:11.4 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:31:57.58 +19:42:24.0 Carme (19.0mag)
00:56:36.47 +03:22:45.0 Titan (8.5mag)
00:56:45.54 +03:22:25.0 Rhea (9.8mag)
00:56:12.41 +03:19:45.2 Iapetus (11.2mag)
00:56:44.02 +03:21:38.9 Hyperion (14.5mag)
00:56:28.07 +03:17:47.3 Phoebe (16.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 22 06:14 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461243.95256859:
18:07:40.62 -29:46:28.7 JWST
19:07:59.98 +04:02:29.7 Chandra
06:19:36.65 +23:09:55.5 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 22 06:13 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461243.95256859 -observatory V36
02:52:57.12 +15:47:27.1 17.8mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:09:26.80 -34:36:04.7 13.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:37:42.10 -68:22:54.9 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:04:52.53 +32:39:40.8 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
02:46:00.92 +26:07:54.0 16.0mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:51:36.84 +32:08:40.0 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:25:56.62 +26:47:46.5 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:06:13.91 +29:13:59.7 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:17:39.15 +05:11:12.6 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:11:00.01 -11:42:18.2 17.8mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:33:40.32 +67:19:28.2 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
16:09:18.94 -11:19:05.5 14.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:22:14.83 +66:23:51.8 18.0mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:48:16.54 +30:35:25.7 14.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:11:14.17 +15:33:28.7 17.6mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:25:22.24 +41:26:32.0 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:33:48.39 +47:39:41.8 17.7mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:00:49.41 -13:19:40.4 15.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:44:16.66 +27:02:32.5 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:22:13.98 -14:04:25.2 17.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:10:41.25 +21:52:07.4 17.5mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:49:19.11 +03:21:32.1 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:21:53.35 +79:00:09.1 17.1mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:57:39.46 +45:43:09.1 16.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:33:44.82 +06:29:04.5 17.1mag A/2026 E1
21:37:09.35 -19:53:41.4 7.0mag 10P/Tempel
11:19:28.74 -02:27:07.1 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:17:16.12 +30:49:39.8 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
10:33:15.21 +10:07:08.6 17.1mag 63P/Wild
00:52:34.40 -05:04:00.6 15.5mag 65P/Gunn
04:56:28.49 +20:38:50.2 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
02:40:40.29 +12:07:58.7 16.4mag 88P/Howell
07:10:44.34 +29:36:44.0 15.9mag 93P/Lovas
05:00:44.27 +31:18:51.0 16.6mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
08:38:12.44 +29:12:59.0 15.1mag 123P/West-Hartley
11:10:58.45 -03:41:41.9 16.9mag 124P/Mrkos
05:10:58.50 +21:05:05.4 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
05:58:46.93 +19:31:17.6 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
07:55:37.36 +14:17:10.0 17.0mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:21:23.54 -20:28:50.2 14.9mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
06:16:44.00 +36:09:35.4 15.5mag 162P/SidingSpring
18:19:46.47 +24:01:31.5 13.7mag 169P/NEAT
02:08:57.44 +08:45:01.3 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:35:56.44 -08:58:26.9 17.3mag 235P/LINEAR
20:35:00.83 -51:47:23.1 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
02:33:32.46 +17:43:35.5 15.5mag 260P/McNaught
06:14:10.79 +37:34:51.4 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:06:52.52 +04:54:47.0 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski
08:45:33.54 +19:09:46.7 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
08:10:34.30 +38:11:43.3 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.4K Jul 22 06:13 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-26eg  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.28 16.29
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80    2026-07-16.17 17.02
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 22 06:13 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8  PNV J09550289+6902138  2026-05-18.925  20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6  PNV J00430182+4118166  2026-05-21.8651  18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3  PNV J00423204+4110283  2026-06-26.059  16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8  TCP J02191736+2857158  2026-07-12.3549  12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 22 06:13 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
21:28:30.735 -13:12:02.42  AT 2026thq  2026-07-09.34 21.1053
23:15:36.302 -15:56:19.67  AT 2026thp  2026-07-09.35 22.954
20:46:17.542 -21:59:48.89  AT 2026tho  2026-07-09.29 22.7792
23:22:21.518 -04:57:52.50  AT 2026thn  2026-07-09.39 21.1667
04:01:26.281 -49:05:15.41  AT 2026thm  2026-07-09.42 23.5333
20:19:59.808 -11:52:00.26  AT 2026thl  2026-07-09.24 23.004
04:04:25.960 -49:17:10.25  AT 2026thk  2026-07-09.42 22.8309
20:18:30.116 -08:54:58.45  AT 2026thj  2026-07-09.27 23.008
19:31:06.780 -27:40:37.28  AT 2026thi  2026-07-09.31 22.3354
19:19:08.964 -20:49:20.86  AT 2026thh  2026-07-09.23 23.3724
23:09:35.488 -04:27:52.45  AT 2026thg  2026-07-09.35 22.3109
20:21:14.950 -12:37:31.63  AT 2026thf  2026-07-09.24 23.1886
20:14:38.286 -17:14:45.01  AT 2026the  2026-07-09.24 23.6002
19:29:06.461 -17:52:40.05  AT 2026thd  2026-07-09.23 22.8657
21:09:45.428 -13:55:34.32  AT 2026thc  2026-07-09.29 23.257
20:06:50.792 -15:37:22.53  AT 2026thb  2026-07-09.24 21.5403
23:09:49.547 -09:08:06.82  AT 2026tha  2026-07-09.35 22.9143
21:16:28.184 -15:45:09.49  AT 2026tgz  2026-07-09.29 23.0897
23:19:05.038 -08:43:55.11  AT 2026tgy  2026-07-09.35 21.7217
04:10:49.009 -48:43:16.73  AT 2026tgx  2026-07-09.42 22.2941
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Jul 22 06:13 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Wed Jul 22 06:13:27 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 6 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 7s (0.12 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 41s (0.68 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 94s (1.57 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 5s (0.08 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 147s (2.45 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 12 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 20s (0.33 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 135s (2.25 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 14s (0.23 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 174s (2.90 min)
FIELD_Cet-09-Q2b1x1: 339s (5.65 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 341s (5.68 min)
Finished: Wed Jul 22 06:19:08 CDT 2026