This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9296,8.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4296 8.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.4296 2461243.9296 10.30 00:26:10.02 +01:36:30.2
109.97291 -60.62595 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 3.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.192 Nausikaa -0 0 0 10.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:26:10.02 +01:36:30.2: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 00:26:10.02 +01:36:30.2: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9296,10.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4296 10.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9296,8.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4296 8.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.4296 2461243.9296 12.55 00:14:39.19 -04:41:35.0
99.96250 -65.91078 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.106 Dione -1 -0 1 12.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:14:39.19 -04:41:35.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 00:14:39.19 -04:41:35.0: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9296,12.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4296 12.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.4296 2461243.9296 12.68 23:53:56.15 -04:51:23.0
88.78747 -63.84825 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.113 Amalthea -1 -0 1 12.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:53:56.15 -04:51:23.0: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:53:56.15 -04:51:23.0: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9296,12.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4296 12.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.4296 2461243.9296 12.94 00:04:47.01 +00:17:28.9
98.79160 -60.37520 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.317 Roxane -1 -0 1 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:04:47.01 +00:17:28.9: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 00:04:47.01 +00:17:28.9: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9296,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4296 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.4296 2461243.9296 13.38 00:08:35.96 +02:53:55.5
102.28251 -58.24511 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 3.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.217 Eudora -0 -0 0 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:08:35.96 +02:53:55.5: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 00:08:35.96 +02:53:55.5: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9296,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4296 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.4296 2461243.9296 13.90 23:39:05.10 -05:17:14.6
81.44404 -62.18075 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.442 Eichsfeldia -2 -0 2 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:39:05.10 -05:17:14.6: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:39:05.10 -05:17:14.6: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9296,13.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4296 13.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.4296 2461243.9296 14.14 23:54:16.75 +01:32:35.6
95.01575 -58.19634 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 3.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.570 Kythera -1 -1 1 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:54:16.75 +01:32:35.6: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:54:16.75 +01:32:35.6: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9296,14.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4296 14.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.4296 2461243.9296 14.48 23:58:20.72 +00:34:45.4
96.04456 -59.49209 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.799 Gudula -1 -1 1 14.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:58:20.72 +00:34:45.4: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:58:20.72 +00:34:45.4: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9296,14.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4296 14.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.4296 2461243.9296 14.39 00:06:55.14 -02:02:18.5
98.02563 -62.73744 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 3.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.328 Gudrun -1 -1 1 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:06:55.14 -02:02:18.5: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 00:06:55.14 -02:02:18.5: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9296,14.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4296 14.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.60800240 23.12.2025 02:35:21.407 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461032.60800240 23.12.2025 02:35:21.407 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461243.93079803 22.07.2026 10:20:10.950 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 19
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6040
Objects passed selection criteria: 6038
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5513
Average stars matched: 5367.5 (97.3608 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115172 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-162-g0b3e9b13
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 22 05:23:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.60800240 23.12.2025 02:35:21.407 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461032.60800240 23.12.2025 02:35:21.407 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461243.93079803 22.07.2026 10:20:10.950 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 118
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 28860
Objects passed selection criteria: 28797
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 27063
Average stars matched: 26498.5 (97.9141 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 137456 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-162-g0b3e9b13
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 22 05:26:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461243.92847362
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits'
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits'
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:54.531 -02:01:08.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:05.768 -01:58:14.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:54.531 -02:01:08.13
Second-epoch image center 00:00:05.768 -01:58:14.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0671 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:06.283 -01:57:57.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:54.531 -02:01:08.13
Second-epoch image center 00:00:06.283 -01:57:57.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0721 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:05.768 -01:58:14.94
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:06.283 -01:57:57.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00534 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5YhKWKuJo4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jizwxMkTp3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uE6KbLu4KA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZXzAED8cBD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6067 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0003 to 359.9989 deg, Dec -7.3208 to +3.2939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0003 to 359.9989 deg, Dec -7.3208 to 3.2939 deg
Loaded 160398 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3377 out of 3518 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3518 out of 6067 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.910100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.910100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6067 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0003 to 359.9989 deg, Dec -7.3208 to +3.2939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0003 to 359.9989 deg, Dec -7.3208 to 3.2939 deg
Loaded 160398 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3377 out of 3518 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3518 out of 6067 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 4435 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0002 to 359.9990 deg, Dec -7.2785 to +3.2970 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0002 to 359.9990 deg, Dec -7.2785 to 3.2970 deg
Loaded 159756 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3124 out of 3207 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3207 out of 4435 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 19 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.1 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
3.9 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
2.6 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
14.7 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5YhKWKuJo4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=423, bad_region=0, passed=6067
Got 6067 stars (including 5634 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6067 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0769 through 0 to 7.8992, gap 7.8992 to 352.0769
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0770 through 0 to 7.8996, gap 7.8996 to 352.0770
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.243 n_q1=224 n_q2=259 n_q3=222 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jizwxMkTp3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=306, bad_region=0, passed=4435
Got 4435 stars (including 4123 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4435 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013089 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010471 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1109 through 0 to 7.9481, gap 7.9481 to 352.1109
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1111 through 0 to 7.9486, gap 7.9486 to 352.1111
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=228 n_q2=262 n_q3=225 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uE6KbLu4KA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=230, bad_region=0, passed=5816
Got 5816 stars (including 5580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5816 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8571 through 0 to 8.1423, gap 8.1423 to 351.8571
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8565 through 0 to 8.1426, gap 8.1426 to 351.8565
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=257 n_q2=216 n_q3=273 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.200
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZXzAED8cBD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=315, bad_region=0, passed=5888
Got 5888 stars (including 5566 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5888 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8569 through 0 to 8.1420, gap 8.1420 to 351.8569
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8566 through 0 to 8.1425, gap 8.1425 to 351.8566
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=264 n_q2=219 n_q3=271 n_q4=206 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.309 worst_q_ratio=1.107
ref2=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits sigma_overall=0.337 worst_q_ratio=1.185
new1=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits sigma_overall=0.287 worst_q_ratio=1.200
new2=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits sigma_overall=0.305 worst_q_ratio=1.086
reference average sigma_overall=0.323 worst_q_ratio=1.146
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:01:38.93 -02:23:34.9: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:26:10.02 +01:36:30.2: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:07:41.27 -03:17:58.2: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:02:33.45 -01:42:28.6: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:03:18.00 -02:56:33.2: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:56:56.83 -02:57:18.3: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:01:56.88 -02:33:07.7: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:50:05.29 -00:18:20.4: 10.83 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 00:26:10.02 +01:36:30.2: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 00:01:38.93 -02:23:34.9: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 00:07:41.27 -03:17:58.2: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:01:38.93 -02:23:34.9: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2618 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 00:02:33.45 -01:42:28.6: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:07:41.27 -03:17:58.2: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2160 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 00:03:18.00 -02:56:33.2: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:03:18.00 -02:56:33.2: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2288 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:02:33.45 -01:42:28.6: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1901 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:56:56.83 -02:57:18.3: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:10:56.70 -03:10:04.0: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:56.83 -02:57:18.3: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1398 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 00:01:56.88 -02:33:07.7: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:01:56.88 -02:33:07.7: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2075 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:50:05.29 -00:18:20.4: 10.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.84 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:50:05.29 -00:18:20.4: ref_mag=10.84 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1577 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 00:10:56.70 -03:10:04.0: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:10:56.70 -03:10:04.0: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2559 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:55:26.48 -02:28:08.1: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:04:34.76 -02:37:12.3: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:26:02.60 -00:18:57.8: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:59:56.10 +01:01:30.1: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:55:26.48 -02:28:08.1: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 00:04:34.76 -02:37:12.3: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:04:34.76 -02:37:12.3: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2344 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:26.48 -02:28:08.1: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2547 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:42:09.61 +00:28:19.2: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 00:26:02.60 -00:18:57.8: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:02.60 -00:18:57.8: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3479 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:54:11.54 +00:06:07.0: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:59:56.10 +01:01:30.1: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:59:56.10 +01:01:30.1: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3155 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:57:20.33 -00:53:01.0: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:29:40.47 -01:47:15.1: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:42:09.61 +00:28:19.2: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:42:09.61 +00:28:19.2: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2587 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:54:11.54 +00:06:07.0: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:54:11.54 +00:06:07.0: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2759 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:57:20.33 -00:53:01.0: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:57:20.33 -00:53:01.0: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3166 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 00:29:40.47 -01:47:15.1: 12.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:40.47 -01:47:15.1: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3597 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20072.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20030_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 20030_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20035_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 20035_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20072_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 20072_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20177_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 20177_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:01:38.61 -03:45:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20194_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 20194_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20205_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 20205_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20209_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 20209_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20210_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 20210_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20214_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 20214_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20216_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 20216_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20217_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 20217_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20220_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 20220_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20224_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 20224_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20227_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 20227_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20228_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 20228_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20232_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 20232_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20235_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 20235_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20241_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 20241_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20243_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 20243_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:26:10.02 +01:36:30.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:54.531 -02:01:08.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:05.768 -01:58:14.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:54.531 -02:01:08.13
Second-epoch image center 00:00:05.768 -01:58:14.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0671 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:06.283 -01:57:57.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:54.531 -02:01:08.13
Second-epoch image center 00:00:06.283 -01:57:57.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0721 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:05.768 -01:58:14.94
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:06.283 -01:57:57.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00534 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9oe4oUSeni
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits &> /tmp/tmp.a0fyeV7SMr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4QZHvrVcmj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FEavelaxW7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32031 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0003 to 359.9991 deg, Dec -7.3224 to +3.3002 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0003 to 359.9991 deg, Dec -7.3224 to 3.3002 deg
Loaded 160540 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3289 out of 3587 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3587 out of 32031 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.807000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.807000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32031 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0003 to 359.9991 deg, Dec -7.3224 to +3.3002 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0003 to 359.9991 deg, Dec -7.3224 to 3.3002 deg
Loaded 160540 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3289 out of 3587 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3587 out of 32031 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 25338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0003 to 359.9996 deg, Dec -7.3018 to +3.3134 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0003 to 359.9996 deg, Dec -7.3018 to 3.3134 deg
Loaded 160436 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3389 out of 3598 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3598 out of 25338 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 96 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.0 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
3.5 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
2.5 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
14.9 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9oe4oUSeni (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1283, bad_region=4, passed=32019
Got 32019 stars (including 30688 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32019 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0737 through 0 to 7.9287, gap 7.9287 to 352.0737
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0738 through 0 to 7.9292, gap 7.9292 to 352.0738
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.231 n_q1=225 n_q2=253 n_q3=225 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.a0fyeV7SMr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=816, bad_region=1, passed=25327
Got 25327 stars (including 24466 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25327 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013089 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010471 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0997 through 0 to 7.9481, gap 7.9481 to 352.0997
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0999 through 0 to 7.9487, gap 7.9487 to 352.0999
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.345 n_q1=232 n_q2=255 n_q3=229 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.073
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4QZHvrVcmj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1030, bad_region=26, passed=23502
Got 23502 stars (including 22424 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23502 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8571 through 0 to 8.1423, gap 8.1423 to 351.8571
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8565 through 0 to 8.1426, gap 8.1426 to 351.8565
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=249 n_q2=216 n_q3=272 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FEavelaxW7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=907, bad_region=25, passed=28188
Got 28188 stars (including 27219 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28188 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8356 through 0 to 8.1420, gap 8.1420 to 351.8356
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27658 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8351 through 0 to 8.1424, gap 8.1424 to 351.8351
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27655 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27655 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=259 n_q2=221 n_q3=263 n_q4=212 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_052058_TTUQ1b1x1_3600350_GYbCycaV/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:14:39.19 -04:41:35.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:53:56.15 -04:51:23.0: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:04:47.01 +00:17:28.9: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 00:14:39.19 -04:41:35.0: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:08:35.96 +02:53:55.5: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:53:56.15 -04:51:23.0: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 00:04:47.01 +00:17:28.9: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 00:08:35.96 +02:53:55.5: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:39:05.10 -05:17:14.6: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:54:16.75 +01:32:35.6: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:39:05.10 -05:17:14.6: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:54:16.75 +01:32:35.6: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:58:20.72 +00:34:45.4: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:39:45.45 +02:49:57.3: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:58:20.72 +00:34:45.4: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:39:45.45 +02:49:57.3: 14.78 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:45.45 +02:49:57.3: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6522 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:52:00.65 -02:19:00.8: 14.81 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:50:09.45 +01:01:25.7: 15.22 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:52:00.65 -02:19:00.8: 14.72 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:00.65 -02:19:00.8: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5295 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:50:09.45 +01:01:25.7: 15.00 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:50:09.45 +01:01:25.7: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6159 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:06:55.14 -02:02:18.5: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 00:06:55.14 -02:02:18.5: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:40:59.21 +01:33:21.7: 14.75 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:40:59.21 +01:33:21.7: 14.87 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:40:59.21 +01:33:21.7: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7013 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:38:55.46 +02:51:53.0: 15.11 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:38:55.46 +02:51:53.0: 14.92 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:55.46 +02:51:53.0: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7670 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:33:15.48 +00:46:48.9: 14.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:38:33.34 +01:03:13.8: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:33:15.48 +00:46:48.9: 14.52 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:15.48 +00:46:48.9: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5163 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:38:33.34 +01:03:13.8: 14.81 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:33.34 +01:03:13.8: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6678 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:18:22.05 -04:30:01.4: 15.44 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 00:18:22.05 -04:30:01.4: 15.08 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:22.05 -04:30:01.4: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.6622 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:32:19.26 -00:14:15.1: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:32:19.26 -00:14:15.1: 15.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:19.26 -00:14:15.1: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.8103 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-35-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:37:17.48 -01:50:09.7: 15.75 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_21-04-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0072.fits at 23:37:17.48 -01:50:09.7: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.75 +/- 0.34
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:37:17.48 -01:50:09.7: ref_mag=15.75 +/- 0.34 new_mean_mag=14.6679 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out51425.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out50633.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out50662.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out50688.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out50768.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51166.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51189.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51300.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51350.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50404_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 50404_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50439_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50439_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:26:10.02 +01:36:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50518_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50518_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50520_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50520_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50524_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50524_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50574_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50574_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50600_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50600_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50622_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50622_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50629_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50629_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:14:21.56 -02:13:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50633_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 50633_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50662_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 50662_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50688_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 50688_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50700_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50700_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50727_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50727_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50741_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50741_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50750_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50750_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50753_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50753_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50760_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50760_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50768_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 50768_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50795_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50795_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50804_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50804_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50809_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50809_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50812_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50812_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50846_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50846_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50851_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50851_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50854_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50854_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50865_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50865_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50869_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50869_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50874_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50874_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50885_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50885_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50888_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50888_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50890_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50890_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50906_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50906_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50957_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50957_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50971_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 50971_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51004_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51004_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51024_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51024_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51029_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51029_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51057_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51057_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51135_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51135_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51146_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51146_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51154_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51154_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51162_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51162_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51166_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 51166_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51176_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51176_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51189_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 51189_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51190_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51190_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51215_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51215_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51219_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51219_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51226_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51226_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51227_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51227_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51230_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51230_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51246_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51246_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51249_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51249_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51261_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51261_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51268_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51268_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51270_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51270_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51272_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51272_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51279_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51279_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51280_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51280_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51284_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51284_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51295_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51295_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51300_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 51300_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51312_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51312_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51313_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51313_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51315_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51315_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51326_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51326_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51328_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51328_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51331_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51331_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51333_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51333_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51335_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51335_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51338_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51338_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51343_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51343_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51344_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51344_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51350_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 51350_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51361_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51361_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51364_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51364_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51367_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51367_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51368_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51368_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51374_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51374_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51375_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51375_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51377_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51377_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51389_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51389_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51395_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51395_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51396_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51396_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51411_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51411_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51413_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51413_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51418_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51418_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51421_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51421_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51425_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51425_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:37:17.48 -01:50:09.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.66)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.535 2640832836051673088 354.32302738034 -01.83640749980 14.8462 14.1115 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.535#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51427_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51427_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51432_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51432_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51437_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51437_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51442_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51442_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51443_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51443_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51445_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51445_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
