NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Tau-06-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 22.41188    2461243.91188    13.02    04:28:04.18 +15:32:36.6   4921 4144   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    12.97    04:28:04.21 +15:32:38.0   4914 4139   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 22.4122  2461243.9122  12.99  04:28:04.19 +15:32:37.3
180.52664 -22.32646 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
59 Elpis                   -0      2       2  13.3    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:04.19 +15:32:37.3:  16.36 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:04.19 +15:32:37.3:  16.24 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Tau-06-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
Field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Tau-06-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Tau-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Tau-06-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 949086 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 949086 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits_preview.png'
Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits

renamed 'Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits_preview.png'
Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 559.8035 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 711.9893 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1738.6885 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 600.6005 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1735.2094 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 602.4298 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.10589 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-22T04:52:56.3488012' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-22T09:52:56.3488012' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61243.4117632871 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-22T09:53:06.2500037' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61243.4118778934 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 66.6645922984085 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 14.0000364862298 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.5425 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 83.255 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.68433179473494 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 26 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29520 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29520 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 60.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.3 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 33.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.400112 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/d_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits :) Spent 1.024008 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/d_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-22T04:53:52.7293955' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-22T09:53:52.7293955' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61243.4124158449 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-22T09:54:02.6313530' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61243.4125304515 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 66.6645922221164 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 14.0000364751629 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.7352777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 83.3783333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.64152188520558 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 26 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29520 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29520 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 60.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.3 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 33.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.400112 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/d_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits :) Spent 0.932920 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/d_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits


fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461243.91187903 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits' wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:39.772 +13:59:59.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits Image size: 944.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:47.779 +13:58:50.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.772 +13:59:59.36 Second-epoch image center 04:26:47.779 +13:58:50.31 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0376 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits Image size: 944.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:50.514 +13:59:23.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.772 +13:59:59.36 Second-epoch image center 04:26:50.514 +13:59:23.62 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0445 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:26:47.779 +13:58:50.31 Second-epoch second image center 04:26:50.514 +13:59:23.62 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01442 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lHWvEhOJbY Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ob0Zlh8dxQ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5ve3AS25ux Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2JtAUhNYtd Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3910 to 74.9274 deg, Dec +8.6225 to +19.2877 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3910 to 74.9274 deg, Dec 8.6225 to 19.2877 deg Loaded 4388 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3407 out of 3668 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3668 out of 9344 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.989100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.989100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3910 to 74.9274 deg, Dec +8.6225 to +19.2877 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3910 to 74.9274 deg, Dec 8.6225 to 19.2877 deg Loaded 4388 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3407 out of 3668 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3668 out of 9344 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=6.0) Read 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4336 to 74.9933 deg, Dec +8.6225 to +19.2874 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4336 to 74.9933 deg, Dec 8.6225 to 19.2874 deg Loaded 4405 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3648 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3648 out of 8488 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=5.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 2.4 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits 2.4 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 15.3 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 13.8 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits 13.8 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.lHWvEhOJbY (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=728, bad_region=0, passed=9344 Got 9344 stars (including 8597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9113 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9114 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9114 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=245 n_q2=231 n_q3=268 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ob0Zlh8dxQ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=679, bad_region=1, passed=8488 Got 8488 stars (including 7793 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8296 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8295 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8295 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=234 n_q2=241 n_q3=258 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.349 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.5ve3AS25ux (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=244, bad_region=0, passed=3589 Got 3589 stars (including 3338 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3589 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3550 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3550 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3550 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=239 n_q2=185 n_q3=273 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.360 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.2JtAUhNYtd (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=242, bad_region=0, passed=3656 Got 3656 stars (including 3409 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3656 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3615 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3615 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3615 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.611 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.388 n_q1=241 n_q2=190 n_q3=263 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.505 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits sigma_overall=0.353 worst_q_ratio=1.177 ref2=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits sigma_overall=0.382 worst_q_ratio=1.349 new1=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits sigma_overall=0.417 worst_q_ratio=1.360 new2=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits sigma_overall=0.406 worst_q_ratio=1.505 reference average sigma_overall=0.3675 worst_q_ratio=1.263 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380_astrometric_residuals.png (947 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381_astrometric_residuals.png (948 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:38.75 +11:19:31.7: 11.31 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:38.75 +11:19:31.7: 11.34 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.32 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:38.75 +11:19:31.7: ref_mag=11.32 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4314 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20179_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 20179_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 22.41188    2461243.91188    11.54    04:02:38.71 +11:19:31.5   1303 1427   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    11.36    04:02:38.78 +11:19:31.9   1296 1422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    10.50    04:25:27.21 +16:33:23.5   4503 4726   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits **** FOUND 04:25:27.22 +16:33:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 02425_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 02425_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    10.76    04:02:45.80 +16:40:33.1   1215 4664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits **** FOUND 04:02:45.79 +16:40:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:39.772 +13:59:59.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits Image size: 944.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:47.779 +13:58:50.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.772 +13:59:59.36 Second-epoch image center 04:26:47.779 +13:58:50.31 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0376 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits Image size: 944.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:50.514 +13:59:23.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.772 +13:59:59.36 Second-epoch image center 04:26:50.514 +13:59:23.62 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0445 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:26:47.779 +13:58:50.31 Second-epoch second image center 04:26:50.514 +13:59:23.62 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01442 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6wdBenNFD6 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lwloJhTJOH Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7gUmwjPjCs Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9d7gQsoqee Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3910 to 74.9794 deg, Dec +8.6225 to +19.2877 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3910 to 74.9794 deg, Dec 8.6225 to 19.2877 deg Loaded 4414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3084 out of 3671 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3671 out of 62263 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.852850 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.852850 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3910 to 74.9794 deg, Dec +8.6225 to +19.2877 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3910 to 74.9794 deg, Dec 8.6225 to 19.2877 deg Loaded 4414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3084 out of 3671 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3671 out of 62263 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=4.5) Read 58309 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4028 to 74.9974 deg, Dec +8.6073 to +19.2872 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4028 to 74.9974 deg, Dec 8.6073 to 19.2872 deg Loaded 4430 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3132 out of 3672 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 58309 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=4.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 32 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 1.8 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 2.3 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits 2.3 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits 1.9 pix wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 1.8 pix wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 15.5 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 14.0 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits 14.0 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.6wdBenNFD6 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3506, bad_region=5, passed=62251 Got 62251 stars (including 58597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62251 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61240 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61239 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61239 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.358 n_q1=238 n_q2=230 n_q3=272 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.lwloJhTJOH (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3080, bad_region=5, passed=58299 Got 58299 stars (including 55093 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58299 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57429 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57431 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57432 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=231 n_q2=240 n_q3=264 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.7gUmwjPjCs (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=663, bad_region=9, passed=24213 Got 24213 stars (including 23486 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24213 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23865 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23862 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23863 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.440 n_q1=242 n_q2=184 n_q3=272 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.330 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.9d7gQsoqee (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=676, bad_region=13, passed=24364 Got 24364 stars (including 23636 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24364 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24054 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24056 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24056 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=241 n_q2=187 n_q3=264 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.459 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:38.72 +11:19:32.0: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:09:51.76 +13:59:56.5: 13.87 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:22:30.70 +15:13:13.1: 14.03 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:19:54.82 +10:10:23.5: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:12:44.74 +11:09:33.3: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:04.19 +15:32:37.3: 16.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:33:12.40 +12:49:54.9: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:09:51.76 +13:59:56.5: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:19:54.82 +10:10:23.5: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:22:30.70 +15:13:13.1: 13.97 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:51.76 +13:59:56.5: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5455 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:38.72 +11:19:32.0: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:54.82 +10:10:23.5: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4054 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:30.70 +15:13:13.1: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7223 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:38.72 +11:19:32.0: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6651 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:42:39.41 +17:52:57.5: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:35.53 +17:25:29.4: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:04.19 +15:32:37.3: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:12:44.74 +11:09:33.3: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:44.74 +11:09:33.3: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2677 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:33:12.40 +12:49:54.9: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:12.40 +12:49:54.9: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0172 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:56:23.01 +16:16:05.2: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:42:39.41 +17:52:57.5: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:35.53 +17:25:29.4: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:39.41 +17:52:57.5: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2307 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:35.53 +17:25:29.4: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1869 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:21:31.35 +14:26:00.9: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:56:23.01 +16:16:05.2: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:23.01 +16:16:05.2: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8168 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:21:31.35 +14:26:00.9: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:31.35 +14:26:00.9: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4902 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76086.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75626_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 75626_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 22.41188    2461243.91188    13.76    04:22:30.71 +15:13:12.7   4128 3905   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    13.70    04:22:30.68 +15:13:13.4   4121 3899   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75627_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 75627_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 22.41188    2461243.91188    13.83    04:09:51.68 +13:59:55.8   2318 3085   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    13.45    04:09:51.84 +13:59:57.2   2312 3080   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75629_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 75629_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 22.41188    2461243.91188    13.40    04:19:54.83 +10:10:23.2   3897 0848   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    13.42    04:19:54.81 +10:10:23.9   3891 0842   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75632_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 75632_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 22.41188    2461243.91188    11.66    04:02:38.73 +11:19:32.0   1303 1427   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    11.67    04:02:38.72 +11:19:31.9   1296 1422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75802_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 75802_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    11.89    04:26:24.84 +15:35:08.2   4674 4150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits **** FOUND 04:26:24.85 +15:35:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75857_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 75857_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    12.11    04:30:44.02 +13:42:58.2   5364 3065   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits **** FOUND 04:30:44.01 +13:42:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75897_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 75897_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    12.78    04:10:47.85 +18:26:17.8   2342 5769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits **** FOUND 04:10:47.87 +18:26:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75944_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 75944_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    13.06    04:00:43.03 +18:12:30.5   0887 5590   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits **** FOUND 04:00:43.10 +18:12:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76016_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 76016_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    12.32    04:56:12.06 +13:30:59.8   9104 3228   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits **** FOUND 04:56:12.05 +13:30:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76083_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 76083_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    12.71    04:33:58.55 +10:13:54.8   5968 0999   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits **** FOUND 04:33:58.42 +10:13:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76086_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 Preparing report for the candidate 76086_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76116_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 76116_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    13.23    04:21:59.71 +14:06:15.3   4080 3225   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits **** FOUND 04:21:59.65 +14:06:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76139_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 76139_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 22.41188    2461243.91188    13.02    04:33:12.43 +12:49:55.8   5763 2563   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    13.02    04:33:12.38 +12:49:54.0   5757 2557   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76141_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 76141_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    13.18    04:30:08.12 +15:39:59.6   5208 4231   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits **** FOUND 04:30:08.15 +15:39:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76162_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 76162_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    13.34    04:30:13.61 +15:39:28.7   5222 4226   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits **** FOUND 04:30:13.71 +15:39:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76165_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 76165_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 22.41188    2461243.91188    13.25    04:12:44.68 +11:09:33.2   2809 1391   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    13.28    04:12:44.80 +11:09:33.4   2803 1385   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76178_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 76178_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 22.41188    2461243.91188    13.15    04:38:35.55 +17:25:30.2   6366 5379   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    13.23    04:38:35.52 +17:25:28.6   6359 5372   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76179_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 76179_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    13.58    04:00:49.88 +12:30:12.6   1005 2127   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits **** FOUND 04:00:49.86 +12:30:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76187_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 76187_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 22.41188    2461243.91188    13.14    04:42:39.48 +17:52:56.7   6931 5701   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    13.38    04:42:39.35 +17:52:58.3   6924 5695   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76218_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 76218_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 22.41188    2461243.91188    13.74    03:56:22.92 +16:16:05.5   0291 4401   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    13.93    03:56:23.10 +16:16:04.9   0284 4395   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76261_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 76261_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    13.39    04:20:48.69 +13:50:48.4   3916 3061   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits **** FOUND 04:20:48.60 +13:50:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76301_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 76301_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 22.41188    2461243.91188    13.50    04:21:31.31 +14:26:01.3   4008 3425   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    13.48    04:21:31.40 +14:26:00.5   4002 3419   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 11686_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 11686_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    12.73    04:52:46.98 +17:16:29.1   8415 5455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits **** FOUND 04:52:47.00 +17:16:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    11.25    04:54:18.54 +11:10:44.2   8942 1791   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits **** FOUND 04:54:18.58 +11:10:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 08853_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 08853_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    12.77    04:33:39.40 +17:51:51.7   5634 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits **** FOUND 04:33:39.36 +17:51:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36294_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 36294_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    12.89    04:55:05.77 +13:07:33.4   8960 2978   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits **** FOUND 04:55:05.73 +13:07:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56370_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 56370_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    11.36    04:43:24.04 +11:35:05.7   7304 1910   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits **** FOUND 04:43:24.04 +11:35:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 47416_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 47416_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    9.77    04:28:18.02 +10:09:46.6   5131 0906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits **** FOUND 04:28:18.02 +10:09:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 39342_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 39342_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    6.75    04:50:36.72 +08:53:58.9   8502 0364   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits **** FOUND 04:50:36.71 +08:53:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 47885_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 47885_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    6.74    04:54:53.69 +10:08:59.7   9082 1174   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits **** FOUND 04:54:53.72 +10:08:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32892_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 32892_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    6.81    04:56:21.89 +13:30:49.9   9129 3229   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits **** FOUND 04:56:21.89 +13:30:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 28585_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 The candidate 28585_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 22.41253    2461243.91253    6.87    04:52:31.67 +14:14:59.9   8525 3623   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045835_TTUQ1b1x1_974125_6RsASoUt/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-53-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0381.fits **** FOUND 04:52:31.67 +14:15:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 04:28:04.19 +15:32:37.3 ########### Completed Tau-06-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 04:28:04.19 +15:32:37.3 ################################################################################### 04:28:04.19 +15:32:37.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461243.91187903 -observatory V36 07:07:29.80 +18:10:08.5 Mercury (2.5mag) 11:00:26.86 +07:08:09.9 Venus (-4.2mag) 04:59:54.41 +22:40:56.8 Mars (1.3mag) 08:27:40.31 +19:35:32.2 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:43.48 +03:22:18.6 Saturn (0.7mag) 04:09:22.80 +20:50:47.8 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:49.66 +00:18:43.7 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:29:46.37 -23:23:17.2 Pluto (14.4mag) 14:21:11.47 -19:44:56.8 Moon (-10.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul 22 08:44 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461243.91187903: 08:27:40.44 +19:35:33.7 Io (6.0mag) 08:27:46.74 +19:35:06.6 Europa (6.3mag) 08:27:31.50 +19:36:10.9 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:27:46.93 +19:35:11.2 Callisto (6.7mag) 08:25:41.54 +19:25:20.0 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:27:38.39 +19:35:40.7 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:25:03.72 +19:27:12.6 Elara (17.7mag) 08:31:32.04 +19:23:20.1 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:31:55.49 +19:42:31.0 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:36.56 +03:22:45.4 Titan (8.5mag) 00:56:45.73 +03:22:24.6 Rhea (9.8mag) 00:56:12.29 +03:19:45.6 Iapetus (11.2mag) 00:56:43.79 +03:21:39.2 Hyperion (14.5mag) 00:56:28.05 +03:17:47.8 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 22 08:44 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461243.91187903: 18:07:36.99 -29:48:37.0 JWST 19:02:27.69 +07:28:09.3 Chandra 05:54:40.97 +33:15:14.3 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 22 08:44 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461243.91187903 -observatory V36 02:52:53.92 +15:47:11.5 17.8mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:09:28.31 -34:36:03.4 13.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:37:39.69 -68:22:51.2 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:04:51.75 +32:39:38.0 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 02:45:51.38 +26:05:20.0 16.0mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:51:38.60 +32:08:43.4 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:25:53.95 +26:47:48.2 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:06:11.69 +29:14:06.4 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:17:37.52 +05:11:10.9 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:10:59.98 -11:42:13.9 17.8mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:33:43.69 +67:19:35.1 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 16:09:22.75 -11:18:51.0 14.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:22:10.29 +66:23:42.7 18.0mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:48:13.50 +30:35:18.7 14.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:11:15.02 +15:33:27.1 17.6mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:25:25.56 +41:26:11.8 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:33:51.48 +47:39:24.3 17.7mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:00:47.22 -13:19:44.9 15.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:44:14.77 +27:02:57.1 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:22:12.50 -14:04:09.2 17.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:10:38.15 +21:52:14.9 17.5mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:49:17.99 +03:21:39.9 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:21:58.17 +79:00:15.6 17.1mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:57:37.55 +45:43:03.6 16.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:33:43.01 +06:28:43.7 17.1mag A/2026 E1 21:37:06.20 -19:52:38.3 7.0mag 10P/Tempel 11:19:27.43 -02:26:59.7 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:17:12.78 +30:49:24.7 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:33:10.11 +10:07:56.1 17.1mag 63P/Wild 00:52:33.84 -05:03:59.3 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 04:56:22.68 +20:38:46.4 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 02:40:36.94 +12:07:42.1 16.4mag 88P/Howell 07:10:37.43 +29:36:57.6 15.9mag 93P/Lovas 05:00:36.18 +31:18:52.7 16.6mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 08:38:06.48 +29:13:18.7 15.1mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:10:53.73 -03:40:43.4 16.9mag 124P/Mrkos 05:10:54.67 +21:05:03.0 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 05:58:42.46 +19:31:21.1 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 07:55:29.41 +14:17:44.2 17.0mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:21:23.04 -20:28:58.9 14.9mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 06:16:35.19 +36:09:13.6 15.5mag 162P/SidingSpring 18:19:59.69 +23:59:21.9 13.7mag 169P/NEAT 02:08:52.13 +08:44:50.2 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:35:56.07 -08:58:18.6 17.3mag 235P/LINEAR 20:35:02.81 -51:47:04.1 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 02:33:25.55 +17:42:27.8 15.5mag 260P/McNaught 06:14:03.29 +37:34:45.3 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:06:52.25 +04:55:01.8 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski 08:45:31.30 +19:09:53.1 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 08:10:30.54 +38:11:55.7 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.4K Jul 22 08:44 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-26eg 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 2026-07-16.17 17.02 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 22 08:44 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 22 08:44 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 20:18:54.102 -09:19:51.99 AT 2026thx 2026-07-09.27 23.1972 23:26:47.768 -15:31:49.45 AT 2026thw 2026-07-09.40 22.2901 23:25:12.557 -10:30:44.08 AT 2026thv 2026-07-09.39 22.2987 00:41:12.486 -42:30:41.52 AT 2026thu 2026-07-09.41 22.9637 19:21:59.421 -18:09:06.44 AT 2026tht 2026-07-09.25 23.5536 20:57:08.811 -19:44:38.02 AT 2026ths 2026-07-09.29 22.9916 20:36:05.451 -21:01:28.99 AT 2026thr 2026-07-09.30 22.9768 21:28:30.735 -13:12:02.42 AT 2026thq 2026-07-09.34 21.1053 23:15:36.302 -15:56:19.67 AT 2026thp 2026-07-09.35 22.954 20:46:17.542 -21:59:48.89 AT 2026tho 2026-07-09.29 22.7792 23:22:21.518 -04:57:52.50 AT 2026thn 2026-07-09.39 21.1667 04:01:26.281 -49:05:15.41 AT 2026thm 2026-07-09.42 23.5333 20:19:59.808 -11:52:00.26 AT 2026thl 2026-07-09.24 23.004 04:04:25.960 -49:17:10.25 AT 2026thk 2026-07-09.42 22.8309 20:18:30.116 -08:54:58.45 AT 2026thj 2026-07-09.27 23.008 19:31:06.780 -27:40:37.28 AT 2026thi 2026-07-09.31 22.3354 19:19:08.964 -20:49:20.86 AT 2026thh 2026-07-09.23 23.3724 23:09:35.488 -04:27:52.45 AT 2026thg 2026-07-09.35 22.3109 20:21:14.950 -12:37:31.63 AT 2026thf 2026-07-09.24 23.1886 20:14:38.286 -17:14:45.01 AT 2026the 2026-07-09.24 23.6002 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Jul 22 08:44 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 90 C