This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.3046* 21 36 57.45 -19 49 44.4 11.3 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.8046,11.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.3046 11.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.3046* 21 36 57.40 -19 49 43.9 11.7 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.8046,11.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.3046 11.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.3046 2461243.8046 13.12 21:04:38.51 -18:45:35.5
29.37664 -37.54057 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.462 Eriphyla -1 0 1 13.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:04:38.51 -18:45:35.5: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:04:38.51 -18:45:35.5: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.3046* 21 04 38.51 -18 45 35.5 13.1 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.8046,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.3046 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.3046 2461243.8046 14.04 21:06:19.61 -16:19:41.2
32.40994 -37.03899 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.569 Misa 0 -0 1 14.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:06:19.61 -16:19:41.2: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:06:19.61 -16:19:41.2: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.3046* 21 06 19.61 -16 19 41.2 14.0 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.8046,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.3046 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.3046 2461243.8046 14.12 21:34:18.11 -21:42:02.3
28.65091 -45.07298 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.752 Sulamitis -1 1 1 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:34:18.11 -21:42:02.3: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:34:18.11 -21:42:02.3: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.3046* 21 34 18.11 -21 42 02.3 14.1 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.8046,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.3046 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
First image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Last image: 2461243.80491712 22.07.2026 07:18:54.839 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5533
Objects passed selection criteria: 5528
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5361.5
Average stars matched: 5247.25 (97.8691 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115064 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-162-g0b3e9b13
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 22 04:04:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
First image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Last image: 2461243.80491712 22.07.2026 07:18:54.839 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 77
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 38 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 39938
Objects passed selection criteria: 39829
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 38620.5
Average stars matched: 37378.5 (96.7841 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 145240 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-162-g0b3e9b13
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 22 04:08:10 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461243.80437108
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits'
wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:20:00.192 -17:59:41.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03
Second-epoch image center 21:20:00.192 -17:59:41.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0014 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:20:02.876 -17:59:02.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03
Second-epoch image center 21:20:02.876 -17:59:02.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0146 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:20:00.192 -17:59:41.20
Second-epoch second image center 21:20:02.876 -17:59:02.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01513 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YrbHTYU7FC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits &> /tmp/tmp.apuP738sYn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lof6KQsK5M
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zXoxwU0fGn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7063 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6834 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4994 out of 5122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5122 out of 7063 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.585450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.585450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7063 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6834 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4994 out of 5122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5122 out of 7063 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7087 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2603 to -12.6412 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2603 to -12.6412 deg
Loaded 6814 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5032 out of 5155 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5155 out of 7087 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
2.3 pix Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
14.6 mag. Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.YrbHTYU7FC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=463, bad_region=1472, passed=7063
Got 7063 stars (including 5203 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7063 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=304 n_q2=177 n_q3=295 n_q4=177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.321
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.apuP738sYn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=456, bad_region=1500, passed=7087
Got 7087 stars (including 5211 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7087 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=301 n_q2=175 n_q3=301 n_q4=177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Lof6KQsK5M (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=438, bad_region=1262, passed=6484
Got 6484 stars (including 4856 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6484 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5303 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5303 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=309 n_q2=168 n_q3=308 n_q4=169 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zXoxwU0fGn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=430, bad_region=1269, passed=6450
Got 6450 stars (including 4818 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5270 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5270 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5270 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=308 n_q2=168 n_q3=310 n_q4=168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.223
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits sigma_overall=0.400 worst_q_ratio=1.321
ref2=Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.284
new1=fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits sigma_overall=0.393 worst_q_ratio=1.154
new2=fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits sigma_overall=0.389 worst_q_ratio=1.223
reference average sigma_overall=0.3855 worst_q_ratio=1.3025
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:53:22.77 -17:02:34.0: 11.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:58:50.43 -17:07:15.8: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:53:22.77 -17:02:34.0: 11.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:22.77 -17:02:34.0: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7866 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:58:50.43 -17:07:15.8: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:50.43 -17:07:15.8: ref_mag=11.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5861 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20330_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 20330_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20334_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 20334_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:10:37.56 -16:10:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20335_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 20335_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20340_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 20340_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:20:00.192 -17:59:41.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03
Second-epoch image center 21:20:00.192 -17:59:41.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0014 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:20:02.876 -17:59:02.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03
Second-epoch image center 21:20:02.876 -17:59:02.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0146 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:20:00.192 -17:59:41.20
Second-epoch second image center 21:20:02.876 -17:59:02.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01513 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qkR5bDqdF5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UEKXuQ1Wmc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Z7pzwaVphw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ycxsRgfl0F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 47842 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5476 to 328.4757 deg, Dec -23.2618 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5476 to 328.4757 deg, Dec -23.2618 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6862 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5427 out of 5892 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5892 out of 47842 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.428400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.428400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.85
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.85
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 47842 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5476 to 328.4757 deg, Dec -23.2618 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5476 to 328.4757 deg, Dec -23.2618 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6862 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5427 out of 5892 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5892 out of 47842 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 47137 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5476 to 328.4995 deg, Dec -23.2703 to -12.6356 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5476 to 328.4995 deg, Dec -23.2703 to -12.6356 deg
Loaded 6856 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5425 out of 5895 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5895 out of 47137 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 49 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
2.1 pix Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
14.8 mag. Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.qkR5bDqdF5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2135, bad_region=7409, passed=47826
Got 47826 stars (including 38586 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47826 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=309 n_q2=179 n_q3=287 n_q4=175 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UEKXuQ1Wmc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2107, bad_region=7307, passed=47124
Got 47124 stars (including 38008 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47124 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40437 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40437 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40437 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=307 n_q2=181 n_q3=288 n_q4=174 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Z7pzwaVphw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1811, bad_region=7009, passed=44595
Got 44595 stars (including 36038 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44595 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.353 n_q1=309 n_q2=175 n_q3=294 n_q4=174 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.170
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ycxsRgfl0F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1819, bad_region=7030, passed=44737
Got 44737 stars (including 36136 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44737 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38337 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.416 n_q1=313 n_q2=177 n_q3=291 n_q4=171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_025102_TTUQ2b1x1_2470100_3OPVgeyH/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:12:52.44 -16:05:42.8: 14.14 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:29:18.74 -18:09:54.9: 13.97 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:07:28.11 -18:23:49.1: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:28:22.78 -13:45:20.5: 13.88 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:55:31.68 -16:44:58.2: 14.33 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:11:39.76 -19:21:36.7: 14.29 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:09:25.87 -13:43:06.8: 14.26 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:03:58.31 -18:25:14.9: 14.01 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:57:13.15 -16:40:12.5: 14.17 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:06:34.07 -14:01:18.6: 13.51 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:07:28.11 -18:23:49.1: 12.95 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:29:18.74 -18:09:54.9: 14.04 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:28:22.78 -13:45:20.5: 14.08 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:12:52.44 -16:05:42.8: 14.04 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:06:34.07 -14:01:18.6: 13.42 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:09:25.87 -13:43:06.8: 14.41 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:55:31.68 -16:44:58.2: 14.24 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:03:58.31 -18:25:14.9: 14.05 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:07:28.11 -18:23:49.1: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2745 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:29:18.74 -18:09:54.9: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2498 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:12:52.44 -16:05:42.8: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4022 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:28:22.78 -13:45:20.5: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3005 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:11:39.76 -19:21:36.7: 14.47 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:06:34.07 -14:01:18.6: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7779 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:09:25.87 -13:43:06.8: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1661 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:31.68 -16:44:58.2: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2408 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:58.31 -18:25:14.9: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3164 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:57:13.15 -16:40:12.5: 14.07 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:11:39.76 -19:21:36.7: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3405 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:13.15 -16:40:12.5: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2075 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:22:08.37 -16:48:26.9: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:06:19.61 -16:19:41.2: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:11:14.84 -20:43:18.2: 13.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:04:38.51 -18:45:35.5: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:25:25.31 -15:26:39.6: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:34:18.11 -21:42:02.3: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:56:12.73 -15:53:55.4: 14.66 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:52:23.54 -16:26:05.4: 14.98 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:02:44.15 -18:31:07.1: 13.98 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:22:08.37 -16:48:26.9: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:04:38.51 -18:45:35.5: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:08.37 -16:48:26.9: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3013 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:06:19.61 -16:19:41.2: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:25:25.31 -15:26:39.6: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:11:14.84 -20:43:18.2: 13.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:52:23.54 -16:26:05.4: 14.88 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:34:18.11 -21:42:02.3: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:25:25.31 -15:26:39.6: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3064 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:11:14.84 -20:43:18.2: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2489 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:23.54 -16:26:05.4: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.2257 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:56:12.73 -15:53:55.4: 14.53 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:12.73 -15:53:55.4: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3206 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:02:44.15 -18:31:07.1: 14.04 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:44.15 -18:31:07.1: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9570 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:52:01.87 -21:31:52.7: 14.47 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:54:02.66 -16:54:19.2: 14.64 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:12:11.20 -21:31:52.5: 14.45 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:03:32.73 -14:58:35.0: 14.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:53:43.69 -15:01:17.0: 14.53 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:55:20.73 -21:52:27.0: 14.91 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:54:02.66 -16:54:19.2: 14.76 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:12:11.20 -21:31:52.5: 14.50 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:03:32.73 -14:58:35.0: 14.57 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:52:01.87 -21:31:52.7: 14.67 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:02.66 -16:54:19.2: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4078 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:53:43.69 -15:01:17.0: 14.45 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:32.73 -14:58:35.0: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2171 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:12:11.20 -21:31:52.5: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3746 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:43.69 -15:01:17.0: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3346 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:01.87 -21:31:52.7: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2059 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:55:20.73 -21:52:27.0: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.27
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:20.73 -21:52:27.0: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.27 new_mean_mag=14.1536 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:55:28.41 -18:11:20.3: 14.60 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:29:18.17 -22:06:36.4: 14.61 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:59:25.35 -21:26:43.2: 14.60 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:57:07.01 -22:04:15.5: 14.18 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:53:11.03 -20:31:43.0: 14.69 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:36:23.40 -21:25:21.2: 14.53 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:55:28.41 -18:11:20.3: 14.81 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:59:25.35 -21:26:43.2: 14.98 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:29:18.17 -22:06:36.4: 14.55 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:28.41 -18:11:20.3: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3893 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:25.35 -21:26:43.2: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.2904 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:29:18.17 -22:06:36.4: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2393 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:53:11.03 -20:31:43.0: 14.51 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:57:07.01 -22:04:15.5: 14.49 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:11.03 -20:31:43.0: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3812 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:07.01 -22:04:15.5: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3199 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:36:23.40 -21:25:21.2: 14.66 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:36:23.40 -21:25:21.2: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3383 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:51:44.04 -21:40:27.1: 14.86 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:35:03.08 -21:47:34.7: 14.41 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:55:19.98 -14:33:53.3: 14.99 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:58:38.09 -15:24:50.7: 14.36 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:51:44.04 -21:40:27.1: 14.47 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:44.04 -21:40:27.1: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4149 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:08:31.20 -15:25:13.2: 14.36 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:55:19.98 -14:33:53.3: 14.90 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:19.98 -14:33:53.3: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.4684 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:35:03.08 -21:47:34.7: 14.38 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:35:03.08 -21:47:34.7: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1881 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:57:06.81 -15:14:42.3: 14.62 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:08:31.20 -15:25:13.2: 14.84 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:58:38.09 -15:24:50.7: 14.62 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:08:31.20 -15:25:13.2: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3397 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:38.09 -15:24:50.7: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3872 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:14:34.92 -14:17:17.2: 14.75 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:57:06.81 -15:14:42.3: 14.56 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:06.81 -15:14:42.3: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4675 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:32:11.09 -21:48:01.6: 14.33 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:30:24.05 -15:34:18.7: 14.69 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:14:34.92 -14:17:17.2: 14.48 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:14:34.92 -14:17:17.2: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4483 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:32:11.09 -21:48:01.6: 14.61 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:32:11.09 -21:48:01.6: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1866 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:26:34.76 -17:25:43.1: 14.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:30:24.05 -15:34:18.7: 14.49 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:17:04.48 -21:17:20.5: 14.80 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:30:24.05 -15:34:18.7: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3651 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:17:04.48 -21:17:20.5: 14.74 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:26:34.76 -17:25:43.1: 14.40 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:36:11.22 -17:06:22.4: 14.38 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:34.76 -17:25:43.1: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3791 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:17:04.48 -21:17:20.5: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4396 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:24:02.05 -14:39:24.9: 14.60 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:36:39.70 -20:52:59.0: 14.72 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:36:11.22 -17:06:22.4: 14.24 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:36:11.22 -17:06:22.4: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3906 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:33:16.96 -22:10:02.4: 14.43 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:36:39.70 -20:52:59.0: 14.61 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:36:39.70 -20:52:59.0: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2302 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:24:02.05 -14:39:24.9: 14.45 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:24:02.05 -14:39:24.9: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4416 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:33:16.96 -22:10:02.4: 14.60 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:33:16.96 -22:10:02.4: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4079 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53122.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53153.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53184.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53078_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53078_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53083_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53083_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53085_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53085_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53086_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53086_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53087_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53087_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53088_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53088_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53090_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53090_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53091_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53091_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53098_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53098_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53101_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53101_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53107_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 53107_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53110_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53110_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53122_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 53122_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53124_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53124_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53125_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53125_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53136_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53136_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53147_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53147_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53153_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 53153_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53174_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53174_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53184_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 53184_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53185_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53185_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53186_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53186_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53201_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53201_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53206_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53206_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53209_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53209_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53213_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53213_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53216_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53216_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53221_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53221_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53222_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53222_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53230_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53230_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53231_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53231_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53238_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53238_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53248_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53248_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53250_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53250_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53252_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53252_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53262_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53262_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53263_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53263_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53265_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53265_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53266_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53266_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53272_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53272_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53288_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53288_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53289_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53289_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53291_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53291_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53292_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53292_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53303_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53303_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53329_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53329_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53337_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53337_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53380_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53380_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46524_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 46524_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks