This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.2777 2461243.7777 12.10 20:03:22.94 -14:23:11.1
27.67672 -22.30224 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.125 Liberatrix 0 -0 1 12.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:03:22.94 -14:23:11.1: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:03:22.94 -14:23:11.1: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.7777,12.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.2777 12.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.2777 2461243.7777 13.11 20:15:57.33 -18:45:30.7
24.52304 -26.77019 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1819 Laputa -1 -0 1 13.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:15:57.33 -18:45:30.7: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:15:57.33 -18:45:30.7: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.2777* 20 15 57.33 -18 45 30.7 13.1 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.7777,13.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.2777 13.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.2777 2461243.7777 13.43 20:24:43.29 -15:58:42.6
28.30472 -27.66094 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.479 Caprera 0 -0 1 13.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:24:43.29 -15:58:42.6: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:24:43.29 -15:58:42.6: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.2777* 20 24 43.29 -15 58 42.6 13.4 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.7777,13.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.2777 13.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.2777 2461243.7777 13.57 20:03:49.18 -17:53:08.9
24.22410 -23.77295 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1245 Calvinia 1 -1 1 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:03:49.18 -17:53:08.9: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:03:49.18 -17:53:08.9: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.7777,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.2777 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.2777 2461243.7777 13.81 20:07:29.83 -13:33:22.7
28.93698 -22.87822 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.190 Ismene 1 -1 1 14.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:07:29.83 -13:33:22.7: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:07:29.83 -13:33:22.7: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.2777* 20 07 29.83 -13 33 22.7 13.8 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.7777,13.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.2777 13.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.2777 2461243.7777 13.79 20:07:42.88 -21:00:56.1
21.39408 -25.78227 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1105 Fragaria -1 -1 1 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:07:42.88 -21:00:56.1: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:07:42.88 -21:00:56.1: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.2777* 20 07 42.88 -21 00 56.1 13.8 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.7777,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.2777 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.2777 2461243.7777 14.04 20:14:17.83 -13:41:26.2
29.53546 -24.44258 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.777 Gutemberga 1 -0 1 14.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:14:17.83 -13:41:26.2: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:14:17.83 -13:41:26.2: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.2777* 20 14 17.83 -13 41 26.2 14.0 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.7777,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.2777 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
First image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Last image: 2461243.77891403 22.07.2026 06:41:28.172 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 23
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10439
Objects passed selection criteria: 10432
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9805.25
Average stars matched: 9499.25 (96.8792 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118796 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-162-g0b3e9b13
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 22 05:35:29 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
First image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Last image: 2461243.77891403 22.07.2026 06:41:28.172 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 120
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 90 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 73361
Objects passed selection criteria: 73206
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 66838
Average stars matched: 64440.2 (96.4126 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1927072 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-162-g0b3e9b13
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 22 05:40:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461243.77648838
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:49.107 -17:58:50.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13
Second-epoch image center 20:26:49.107 -17:58:50.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0447 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:45.830 -17:59:17.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13
Second-epoch image center 20:26:45.830 -17:59:17.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0302 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:26:49.107 -17:58:50.39
Second-epoch second image center 20:26:45.830 -17:59:17.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01503 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.78rJn8tk1N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PqTs2WoMo1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Zv6149uOyo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T5516iJ7os
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10504 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Loaded 8345 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6582 out of 6781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6781 out of 10504 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.694350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.694350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.76
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.76
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10504 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Loaded 8345 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6582 out of 6781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6781 out of 10504 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 9446 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2411 to 315.1295 deg, Dec -23.2570 to -12.6183 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2411 to 315.1295 deg, Dec -23.2570 to -12.6183 deg
Loaded 8340 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6363 out of 6536 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6536 out of 9446 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 22 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.3 pix Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
3.9 pix fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
14.6 mag. Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.78rJn8tk1N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=584, bad_region=0, passed=10504
Got 10504 stars (including 9908 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10504 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10272 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.490 n_q1=215 n_q2=286 n_q3=220 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PqTs2WoMo1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=544, bad_region=0, passed=9446
Got 9446 stars (including 8894 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9446 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.576 n_q1=220 n_q2=286 n_q3=212 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Zv6149uOyo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=381, bad_region=0, passed=9648
Got 9648 stars (including 9260 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9648 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9470 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.272 n_q1=234 n_q2=239 n_q3=252 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.311
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.T5516iJ7os (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=522, bad_region=0, passed=9862
Got 9862 stars (including 9335 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9862 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9606 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=245 n_q2=253 n_q3=238 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.049
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits sigma_overall=0.437 worst_q_ratio=1.128
ref2=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits sigma_overall=0.492 worst_q_ratio=1.204
new1=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.311
new2=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits sigma_overall=0.323 worst_q_ratio=1.049
reference average sigma_overall=0.4645 worst_q_ratio=1.166
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215_astrometric_residuals.png (955 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-37-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014213_TTUQ1b1x1_3755146_p4a7ahDg/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:16:19.22 -16:30:08.9: 12.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:28:07.15 -18:31:31.7: 12.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:14:45.92 -14:45:04.4: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:24:49.39 -19:33:11.2: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:07:40.98 -15:35:31.5: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:18:36.56 -20:58:24.0: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:02:59.37 -17:20:26.8: 11.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:28:07.15 -18:31:31.7: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:07.15 -18:31:31.7: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9030 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:02:59.37 -17:20:26.8: 11.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:16:19.22 -16:30:08.9: 11.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:19.22 -16:30:08.9: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9342 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:02:59.37 -17:20:26.8: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8669 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:18:36.56 -20:58:24.0: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:24:49.39 -19:33:11.2: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:07:40.98 -15:35:31.5: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:36.56 -20:58:24.0: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7908 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:49.39 -19:33:11.2: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6196 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:00:33.44 -20:58:21.5: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:40.98 -15:35:31.5: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0083 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:14:45.92 -14:45:04.4: 11.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:45.92 -14:45:04.4: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9752 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:37:51.73 -14:19:52.6: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:16:55.98 -15:40:58.9: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:00:33.44 -20:58:21.5: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:33.44 -20:58:21.5: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8714 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:37:51.73 -14:19:52.6: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:51.73 -14:19:52.6: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9484 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:16:55.98 -15:40:58.9: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:55.98 -15:40:58.9: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9221 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 19:54:56.85 -19:58:39.4: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:21:22.76 -17:42:02.1: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:43:22.86 -15:36:03.5: 11.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:24:06.09 -16:50:13.1: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:26:32.79 -16:32:34.9: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:17:50.03 -17:41:24.0: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:38:15.82 -15:05:37.7: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:26:32.79 -16:32:34.9: 11.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:32.79 -16:32:34.9: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9137 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:24:06.09 -16:50:13.1: 11.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 19:54:56.85 -19:58:39.4: 12.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:06.09 -16:50:13.1: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9909 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:56.85 -19:58:39.4: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0769 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:16:40.49 -18:26:32.7: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:38:15.82 -15:05:37.7: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:15.82 -15:05:37.7: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0064 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:43:22.86 -15:36:03.5: 11.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:21:22.76 -17:42:02.1: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:22.86 -15:36:03.5: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9578 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:22.76 -17:42:02.1: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8956 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:31:40.97 -17:22:10.1: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:17:50.03 -17:41:24.0: 11.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:50.03 -17:41:24.0: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9421 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:16:40.49 -18:26:32.7: 11.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:40.49 -18:26:32.7: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9756 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:31:40.97 -17:22:10.1: 11.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:40.97 -17:22:10.1: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9794 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20412_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 20412_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20422_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 20422_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:53.15 -12:49:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20437_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 20437_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20456_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 20456_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20457_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 20457_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20458_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 20458_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20467_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 20467_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20468_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 20468_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20471_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 20471_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:13:06.43 -14:02:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20486_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 20486_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20487_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 20487_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20489_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 20489_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20495_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 20495_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20497_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 20497_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20499_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 20499_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20516_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 20516_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20523_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 20523_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20528_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 20528_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20532_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 20532_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20545_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 20545_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20548_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 20548_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07212_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 07212_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91259_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 91259_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91268_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 91268_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91272_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 91272_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91275_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 91275_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91282_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 91282_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91290_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 91290_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91296_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 91296_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:04:27.35 -14:42:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91297_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 91297_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91299_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 91299_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91311_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 91311_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91317_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 91317_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91318_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 91318_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91319_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 91319_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91323_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 91323_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91605_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
Preparing report for the candidate 91605_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91877_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 91877_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92245_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92245_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92293_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
Preparing report for the candidate 92293_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92405_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92405_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92438_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92438_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92448_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
Preparing report for the candidate 92448_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92521_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92521_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92545_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92545_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92584_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92584_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92621_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
Preparing report for the candidate 92621_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92636_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92636_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92645_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92645_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92690_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
Preparing report for the candidate 92690_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92716_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92716_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92741_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92741_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92761_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92761_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92771_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92771_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92774_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92774_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92780_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92780_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92791_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92791_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92795_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92795_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92814_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92814_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:19:51.76 -14:02:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92816_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92816_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92822_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
Preparing report for the candidate 92822_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92840_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92840_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92849_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
Preparing report for the candidate 92849_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92883_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92883_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92897_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92897_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92909_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92909_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92910_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92910_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92914_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92914_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92936_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92936_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:03.88 -19:49:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92952_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92952_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92973_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92973_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92975_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92975_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92980_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92980_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92981_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92981_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92991_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 92991_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93003_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93003_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93006_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93006_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93007_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93007_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93013_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93013_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93024_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93024_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93033_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93033_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93041_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93041_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93060_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93060_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93061_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93061_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93078_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93078_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93079_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93079_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93092_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93092_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93114_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93114_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93117_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93117_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93122_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93122_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93128_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93128_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93130_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93130_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93131_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93131_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93135_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93135_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93151_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93151_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93161_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93161_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93175_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93175_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93178_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93178_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93179_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93179_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93183_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93183_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93185_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93185_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93186_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93186_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93189_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93189_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93191_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93191_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93193_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93193_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93194_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93194_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93195_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93195_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93196_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93196_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93199_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93199_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93210_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93210_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93216_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93216_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93218_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93218_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93222_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93222_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93230_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 93230_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58155_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 58155_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:12.26 -16:48:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73043_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 73043_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:10.23 -15:53:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62608_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 62608_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_01-41-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
