NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cet-08-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42905    2461242.92905    11.81    02:10:03.86 -04:58:08.6   0953 6005   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    11.89    02:10:03.84 -04:58:08.6   0951 6004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 21.4293  2461242.9293  11.85  02:10:03.85 -04:58:08.6
166.62955 -60.98244 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.3 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
532 Herculina               -1     -1       1  11.9     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:10:03.85 -04:58:08.6:  15.47 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:10:03.85 -04:58:08.6:  15.44 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-08-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42905    2461242.92905    14.06    02:22:56.55 -08:40:28.3   3054 3887   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    14.06    02:22:56.53 -08:40:27.0   3052 3887   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 21.4293  2461242.9293  14.06  02:22:56.54 -08:40:27.6
176.74864 -61.56761 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 2.3 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
1093 Freda                   -1     -1       1  14.0    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:22:56.54 -08:40:27.6:  15.90 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:22:56.54 -08:40:27.6:  15.88 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-08-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 2

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-08-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Field Cet-08-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Field Cet-08-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
Field Cet-08-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-08-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-08-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-08-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1201372 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1201372 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits_preview.png'
Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits

renamed 'Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits_preview.png'
Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 878.3587 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 480.1864 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1730.4247 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 523.3603 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1726.1297 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 523.1556 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.97007 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-21T05:17:39.7595559' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-21T10:17:39.7595559' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61242.4289323958 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-21T10:17:49.6632080' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61242.4290470253 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 38.5705402520232 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99996596908874 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 27.4941666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 125.476111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.15842048467608 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-08' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '02 34 17' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29511 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29511 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 64.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.71 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 39.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.100088 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/d_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits :) Spent 0.802531 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/d_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-21T05:18:22.5294727' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-21T10:18:22.5294727' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61242.4294274189 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-21T10:18:32.4343048' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61242.42954206 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 38.5705401936054 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99996598879129 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 27.6183333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 125.624444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.14955748828106 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-08' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '02 34 17' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29511 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29511 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 64.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.71 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 39.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.100088 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/d_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits :) Spent 0.857311 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/d_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits


fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461242.92904814 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits' wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits' wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits' wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 02:34:18.006 -10:00:06.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 02:34:18.719 -09:59:54.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 02:34:18.006 -10:00:06.15 Second-epoch image center 02:34:18.719 -09:59:54.39 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0044 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 02:34:19.614 -09:59:53.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 02:34:18.006 -10:00:06.15 Second-epoch image center 02:34:19.614 -09:59:53.92 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0074 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 02:34:18.719 -09:59:54.39 Second-epoch second image center 02:34:19.614 -09:59:53.92 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00367 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5xD2bN1NyH Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GWyVROxZEy Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7cDjDJvIAw Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZeTBJedf4R Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 5469 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5519 to 46.7187 deg, Dec -15.3148 to -4.5794 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5519 to 46.7187 deg, Dec -15.3148 to -4.5794 deg Loaded 4379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3511 out of 3629 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 5469 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.847200 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.847200 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 5469 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5519 to 46.7187 deg, Dec -15.3148 to -4.5794 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5519 to 46.7187 deg, Dec -15.3148 to -4.5794 deg Loaded 4379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3511 out of 3629 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 5469 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits (aperture=5.9) Read 5437 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5485 to 46.7187 deg, Dec -15.3252 to -4.5794 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5485 to 46.7187 deg, Dec -15.3252 to -4.5794 deg Loaded 4383 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3489 out of 3613 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3613 out of 5437 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits (aperture=5.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits 2.0 pix Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits 2.7 pix fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits 2.7 pix fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.1 mag. Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits 15.1 mag. Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.5xD2bN1NyH (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=346, bad_region=0, passed=5469 Got 5469 stars (including 5113 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5469 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5397 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5396 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5396 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=216 n_q2=261 n_q3=239 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits -region wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.GWyVROxZEy (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=355, bad_region=0, passed=5437 Got 5437 stars (including 5070 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5437 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5322 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5321 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5321 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=214 n_q2=261 n_q3=241 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.514 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits -region wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.7cDjDJvIAw (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=196, bad_region=0, passed=4201 Got 4201 stars (including 4001 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4201 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4137 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4141 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4141 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=243 n_q2=225 n_q3=266 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ZeTBJedf4R (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=196, bad_region=0, passed=4231 Got 4231 stars (including 4029 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4231 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4152 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4152 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4152 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.222 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=242 n_q2=230 n_q3=264 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.056 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits sigma_overall=0.305 worst_q_ratio=1.193 ref2=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits sigma_overall=0.324 worst_q_ratio=1.514 new1=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits sigma_overall=0.270 worst_q_ratio=1.178 new2=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits sigma_overall=0.253 worst_q_ratio=1.056 reference average sigma_overall=0.3145 worst_q_ratio=1.3535 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853_astrometric_residuals.png (964 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:10:03.85 -04:58:08.6: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:10:03.85 -04:58:08.6: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20372.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20372_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 Preparing report for the candidate 20372_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 02:10:03.85 -04:58:08.6 wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 02:34:18.006 -10:00:06.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 02:34:18.719 -09:59:54.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 02:34:18.006 -10:00:06.15 Second-epoch image center 02:34:18.719 -09:59:54.39 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0044 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 02:34:19.614 -09:59:53.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 02:34:18.006 -10:00:06.15 Second-epoch image center 02:34:19.614 -09:59:53.92 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0074 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 02:34:18.719 -09:59:54.39 Second-epoch second image center 02:34:19.614 -09:59:53.92 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00367 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MjP5FZls5f Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FT2dqK2bg9 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wHTDp9Feqa Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pBANDgP6Or Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 29449 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5488 to 46.7762 deg, Dec -15.3208 to -4.5605 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5488 to 46.7762 deg, Dec -15.3208 to -4.5605 deg Loaded 4410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3528 out of 3767 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3767 out of 29449 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.750050 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.750050 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 29449 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5488 to 46.7762 deg, Dec -15.3208 to -4.5605 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5488 to 46.7762 deg, Dec -15.3208 to -4.5605 deg Loaded 4410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3528 out of 3767 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3767 out of 29449 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 29614 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5429 to 46.7757 deg, Dec -15.3321 to -4.5646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5429 to 46.7757 deg, Dec -15.3321 to -4.5646 deg Loaded 4412 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3516 out of 3771 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3771 out of 29614 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits (aperture=4.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 61 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits 1.9 pix Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits 2.6 pix fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits 2.6 pix fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits 1.9 pix wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits 1.9 pix wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.2 mag. Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits 15.2 mag. Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits 14.6 mag. fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits 14.6 mag. fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.MjP5FZls5f (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=996, bad_region=22, passed=29438 Got 29438 stars (including 28362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29438 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29011 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29010 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29010 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.279 n_q1=216 n_q2=257 n_q3=242 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.227 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits -region wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.FT2dqK2bg9 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1056, bad_region=21, passed=29593 Got 29593 stars (including 28468 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29593 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29134 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29136 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29136 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=213 n_q2=255 n_q3=247 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.541 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits -region wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.wHTDp9Feqa (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=704, bad_region=14, passed=20592 Got 20592 stars (including 19847 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20592 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20319 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20320 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20320 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=247 n_q2=223 n_q3=266 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.pBANDgP6Or (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=544, bad_region=12, passed=20134 Got 20134 stars (including 19541 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20134 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19881 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19880 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19880 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.223 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=245 n_q2=225 n_q3=264 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.071 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:48:02.39 -12:25:53.1: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 03:03:08.96 -07:51:13.3: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:21:02.56 -05:32:42.6: 14.35 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:48:02.39 -12:25:53.1: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:48:02.39 -12:25:53.1: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5903 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:21:02.56 -05:32:42.6: 14.50 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 03:03:08.96 -07:51:13.3: 13.99 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:21:02.56 -05:32:42.6: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3827 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:03:08.96 -07:51:13.3: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8694 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 03:05:11.41 -06:00:01.0: 13.50 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:39:08.69 -09:48:18.3: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 03:05:11.41 -06:00:01.0: 13.45 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:05:11.41 -06:00:01.0: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5441 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:15:40.53 -05:26:57.8: 13.88 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:46:06.90 -07:20:24.2: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:39:08.69 -09:48:18.3: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:39:08.69 -09:48:18.3: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8154 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:15:40.53 -05:26:57.8: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:15:40.53 -05:26:57.8: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0300 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:46:06.90 -07:20:24.2: 13.98 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:46:06.90 -07:20:24.2: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9149 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:22:56.54 -08:40:27.6: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:22:56.54 -08:40:27.6: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:27:58.79 -08:31:52.7: 14.90 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:27:58.79 -08:31:52.7: 14.97 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:27:58.79 -08:31:52.7: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7263 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32965.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32109_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32109_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42905    2461242.92905    14.36    02:21:02.49 -05:32:42.2   2643 5759   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    14.44    02:21:02.63 -05:32:43.0   2641 5758   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32111_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32111_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42905    2461242.92905    13.84    03:03:09.03 -07:51:12.6   9042 4699   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.89    03:03:08.88 -07:51:14.0   9040 4699   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32202_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32202_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    11.44    02:30:13.79 -12:11:43.6   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32206_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32206_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    11.59    02:23:27.10 -07:32:05.3   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32208_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32208_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    11.64    02:26:30.19 -05:14:50.3   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32211_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32211_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    11.51    02:38:56.43 -12:29:24.4   5551 1735   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32227_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32227_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42905    2461242.92905    11.61    02:48:02.40 -12:25:53.1   6891 1836   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    11.58    02:48:02.38 -12:25:53.0   6888 1835   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32232_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32232_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    11.75    02:09:25.91 -12:19:55.7   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32234_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32234_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    11.79    02:31:54.83 -05:29:46.3   4273 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32238_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32238_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    12.01    02:10:03.87 -04:58:08.7   0951 6004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits **** FOUND 02:10:03.87 -04:58:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32259_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32259_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    12.00    02:38:51.18 -06:21:39.6   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32283_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32283_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    12.11    02:30:18.64 -13:08:46.5   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32289_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32289_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    12.15    03:02:42.87 -07:39:10.0   8969 4818   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits **** FOUND 03:02:42.87 -07:39:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32316_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32316_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    12.51    02:13:15.23 -10:29:48.5   1684 2690   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits **** FOUND 02:13:15.21 -10:29:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32347_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32347_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    12.47    02:25:35.19 -13:53:59.7   3644 0767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32442_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32442_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.07    02:28:24.62 -06:56:19.2   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32445_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32445_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.13    02:14:44.20 -13:18:54.6   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32448_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32448_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    12.82    02:38:11.09 -14:56:25.7   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32454_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32454_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.21    02:13:04.56 -05:53:22.4   1452 5473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32455_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32455_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    12.82    02:03:55.45 -14:32:21.1   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32476_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32476_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.13    02:34:22.79 -10:42:31.8   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32488_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32488_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    12.82    02:56:41.83 -13:06:30.3   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32507_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32507_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.31    02:08:13.39 -10:42:12.6   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32552_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32552_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.25    02:59:24.42 -12:43:01.7   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32561_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32561_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.52    02:05:17.71 -07:23:39.8   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32571_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32571_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.52    02:33:31.17 -04:55:27.1   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32583_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32583_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.34    02:36:29.13 -07:09:17.7   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32609_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32609_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42905    2461242.92905    13.53    03:05:11.46 -06:00:00.5   9318 5844   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.57    03:05:11.37 -06:00:01.5   9316 5844   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32622_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32622_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.74    02:04:04.38 -07:43:27.2   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32629_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32629_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.49    02:08:37.35 -05:52:02.4   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32651_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32651_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.31    02:42:24.00 -10:42:50.9   6005 2830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32671_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32671_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.76    02:04:51.14 -06:55:03.9   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32709_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32709_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.71    02:07:39.05 -14:29:17.8   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32744_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32744_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    14.02    02:12:42.57 -13:14:21.9   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32812_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32812_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.52    02:07:04.90 -13:10:19.0   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32843_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32843_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42905    2461242.92905    13.82    02:39:08.68 -09:48:17.6   5497 3351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.81    02:39:08.70 -09:48:19.1   5495 3351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32854_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32854_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.72    03:03:29.77 -09:50:17.2   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32868_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32868_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.66    02:05:39.49 -05:30:05.4   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32879_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32879_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.88    02:03:42.22 -11:11:05.5   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32882_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32882_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.87    02:40:23.82 -08:26:04.9   5638 4185   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32892_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32892_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42905    2461242.92905    13.88    02:46:06.85 -07:20:24.6   6460 4889   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.95    02:46:06.95 -07:20:23.8   6458 4889   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32909_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32909_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.96    02:09:11.12 -11:08:08.9   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32913_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32913_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42905    2461242.92905    14.03    02:15:40.48 -05:26:58.9   1828 5766   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    14.03    02:15:40.59 -05:26:56.8   1826 5766   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32920_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32920_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    14.04    02:08:02.84 -05:07:07.1   0650 5893   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32939_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32939_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.94    02:28:08.61 -11:30:07.2   3930 2237   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32965_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 Preparing report for the candidate 32965_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32971_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32971_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.89    02:08:47.41 -11:30:41.2   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32990_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32990_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.90    02:38:17.56 -06:06:36.9   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32998_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 32998_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.94    02:58:10.95 -05:55:39.4   8243 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33003_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 33003_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    13.86    02:11:25.34 -10:15:24.0   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33004_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 33004_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    14.04    02:07:13.88 -09:25:17.1   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33009_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 33009_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    14.68    02:03:42.41 -09:18:24.6   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33023_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 33023_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    14.15    03:03:17.34 -08:50:18.0   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33025_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 33025_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    14.50    02:10:50.92 -04:49:41.7   1064 6098   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33033_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 33033_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    14.59    02:42:14.26 -07:21:10.2   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33047_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 33047_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    14.39    02:13:54.18 -05:29:07.0   1559 5727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33049_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 33049_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    14.05    02:04:58.09 -08:34:33.9   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33053_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 33053_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    14.44    02:55:30.77 -09:49:15.6   7930 3458   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33058_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 33058_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    14.36    02:24:25.00 -05:48:06.0   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33060_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 33060_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    14.38    02:22:30.48 -13:53:52.3   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33082_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 The candidate 33082_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42905    2461242.92905    14.69    02:27:58.74 -08:31:52.5   3798 4021   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42954    2461242.92954    14.77    02:27:58.85 -08:31:52.9   3796 4020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 14s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 02:10:03.85 -04:58:08.6 02:22:56.54 -08:40:27.6 ########### Completed Cet-08-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 02:10:03.85 -04:58:08.6 02:22:56.54 -08:40:27.6 ################################################################################### 02:10:03.85 -04:58:08.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 02:22:56.54 -08:40:27.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461242.92904814 -observatory V36 07:08:10.72 +17:59:43.8 Mercury (2.8mag) 10:56:36.26 +07:36:15.1 Venus (-4.2mag) 04:57:00.01 +22:35:54.6 Mars (1.3mag) 08:26:46.48 +19:38:34.1 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:41.24 +03:22:22.5 Saturn (0.7mag) 04:09:13.10 +20:50:22.1 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:51.26 +00:18:57.3 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:29:52.08 -23:22:51.7 Pluto (14.4mag) 13:35:23.91 -15:10:28.2 Moon (-10.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul 21 09:46 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461242.92904814: 08:26:51.20 +19:38:15.1 Io (6.0mag) 08:26:55.38 +19:38:00.1 Europa (6.3mag) 08:26:31.91 +19:39:32.7 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:26:42.91 +19:38:53.0 Callisto (6.7mag) 08:24:49.89 +19:27:51.6 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:26:50.92 +19:38:17.2 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:24:11.73 +19:29:56.3 Elara (17.7mag) 08:30:36.87 +19:26:52.7 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:31:05.25 +19:45:22.9 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:38.63 +03:22:51.0 Titan (8.5mag) 00:56:45.99 +03:22:12.0 Rhea (9.8mag) 00:56:08.93 +03:19:53.7 Iapetus (11.2mag) 00:56:37.56 +03:21:47.0 Hyperion (14.5mag) 00:56:27.13 +03:18:00.2 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 21 09:46 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461242.92904814: 18:05:12.45 -30:06:14.1 JWST 17:18:08.43 +38:49:56.5 Chandra 11:00:03.73 -59:38:56.3 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 21 09:46 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461242.92904814 -observatory V36 02:51:35.42 +15:40:57.2 17.8mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:10:05.03 -34:35:21.5 13.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:36:41.66 -68:21:25.2 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:04:32.71 +32:38:32.5 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 02:41:49.46 +25:02:32.8 15.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:52:20.29 +32:10:02.7 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:24:49.45 +26:48:33.1 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:05:18.67 +29:16:47.9 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:16:58.49 +05:10:29.0 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:10:59.75 -11:40:29.0 17.8mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:35:03.45 +67:22:10.0 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 16:10:56.41 -11:12:56.8 14.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:20:21.98 +66:20:09.3 18.0mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:47:00.25 +30:32:34.9 14.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:11:36.06 +15:32:45.3 17.6mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:26:45.10 +41:17:49.0 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:35:04.66 +47:32:12.9 17.7mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 04:59:54.08 -13:21:37.9 15.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:43:29.28 +27:12:53.9 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:21:37.14 -13:57:48.8 17.0mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:09:24.27 +21:55:15.9 17.5mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:48:51.85 +03:24:47.4 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:23:59.11 +79:02:27.5 17.1mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:56:49.75 +45:40:58.3 16.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:33:00.38 +06:20:15.5 17.1mag A/2026 E1 21:35:42.44 -19:27:05.5 7.0mag 10P/Tempel 11:18:56.43 -02:24:00.6 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:15:51.46 +30:43:25.0 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:31:08.07 +10:27:03.8 17.1mag 63P/Wild 00:52:18.70 -05:03:32.7 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 04:54:02.22 +20:37:18.3 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 02:39:14.28 +12:01:02.4 16.4mag 88P/Howell 07:07:50.46 +29:42:28.0 15.9mag 93P/Lovas 04:57:20.71 +31:19:35.2 16.6mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 08:35:43.25 +29:21:16.0 15.1mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:09:01.07 -03:17:10.2 16.9mag 124P/Mrkos 05:09:22.12 +21:04:06.7 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 05:56:54.48 +19:32:47.1 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 07:52:17.10 +14:31:32.9 16.9mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:21:09.61 -20:32:39.0 14.9mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 06:13:02.69 +36:00:26.5 15.5mag 162P/SidingSpring 18:25:04.77 +23:07:01.4 13.8mag 169P/NEAT 02:06:41.51 +08:40:19.4 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:35:48.19 -08:54:55.7 17.3mag 235P/LINEAR 20:35:45.66 -51:38:42.0 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 02:30:36.94 +17:15:18.2 15.5mag 260P/McNaught 06:11:02.41 +37:32:21.4 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:06:46.54 +05:00:54.7 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski 08:44:37.59 +19:12:30.0 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 08:09:00.12 +38:16:58.7 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.4K Jul 21 09:46 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-26eg 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 2026-07-16.17 17.02 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 21 09:46 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 21 09:46 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 23:07:26.336 -12:56:17.54 AT 2026tcs 2026-06-30.41 21.4398 23:35:32.021 -03:51:50.80 AT 2026tcr 2026-06-30.40 21.2107 22:46:06.496 -01:32:52.07 AT 2026tcq 2026-06-30.33 22.4094 23:56:55.894 -03:32:32.42 AT 2026tcp 2026-06-28.41 20.6565 23:56:58.996 -08:52:15.69 AT 2026tco 2026-06-28.38 20.9296 23:54:46.090 -08:57:09.09 AT 2026tcn 2026-06-28.38 21.0773 23:56:22.967 -02:30:21.39 AT 2026tcm 2026-06-28.41 22.0118 00:00:35.535 -08:28:30.01 AT 2026tcl 2026-06-28.38 20.8879 23:47:52.020 -01:07:14.93 AT 2026tck 2026-06-28.35 22.438 23:52:36.644 -03:46:49.40 AT 2026tcj 2026-06-28.35 22.2179 21:42:47.896 -09:01:31.52 AT 2026tci 2026-06-27.33 23.0184 22:55:02.637 -10:40:03.08 AT 2026tch 2026-06-27.42 22.86 20:55:13.637 -21:18:38.78 AT 2026tcg 2026-06-27.33 23.1947 23:10:16.486 +00:53:13.74 AT 2026tcf 2026-06-27.40 22.6048 21:09:09.750 -14:53:41.10 AT 2026tce 2026-06-27.34 23.112 20:14:07.915 -17:46:14.81 AT 2026tcd 2026-06-27.29 23.1617 23:21:50.876 -02:55:18.61 AT 2026tcc 2026-06-27.39 22.5616 23:40:39.509 +02:06:14.04 AT 2026tcb 2026-06-27.43 22.8588 20:38:31.462 -21:36:47.89 AT 2026tca 2026-06-27.35 22.1497 21:12:20.831 -20:40:40.44 AT 2026tbz 2026-06-27.33 21.9251 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Jul 21 09:46 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 88 C