This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.4293 2461242.9293 11.85 02:10:03.85 -04:58:08.6
166.62955 -60.98244 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.532 Herculina -1 -1 1 11.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:10:03.85 -04:58:08.6: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:10:03.85 -04:58:08.6: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.4293* 02 10 03.85 -04 58 08.6 11.8 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.9293,11.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.4293 11.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.4293 2461242.9293 14.06 02:22:56.54 -08:40:27.6
176.74864 -61.56761 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1093 Freda -1 -1 1 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:22:56.54 -08:40:27.6: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:22:56.54 -08:40:27.6: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.4293* 02 22 56.54 -08 40 27.6 14.1 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.9293,14.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.4293 14.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.64036141 21.01.2026 03:21:57.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
First image: 2461061.64036141 21.01.2026 03:21:57.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Last image: 2461242.92954316 21.07.2026 10:18:22.529 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5306
Objects passed selection criteria: 5298
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4807.75
Average stars matched: 4703.5 (97.8316 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114576 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 21 09:46:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.64036141 21.01.2026 03:21:57.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
First image: 2461061.64036141 21.01.2026 03:21:57.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Last image: 2461242.92954316 21.07.2026 10:18:22.529 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 70
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 28068
Objects passed selection criteria: 27996
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 24752.5
Average stars matched: 23958.5 (96.7922 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 134500 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 21 09:48:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461242.92904814
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits'
wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits'
wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:18.006 -10:00:06.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:18.719 -09:59:54.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:18.006 -10:00:06.15
Second-epoch image center 02:34:18.719 -09:59:54.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0044 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:19.614 -09:59:53.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:18.006 -10:00:06.15
Second-epoch image center 02:34:19.614 -09:59:53.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0074 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:34:18.719 -09:59:54.39
Second-epoch second image center 02:34:19.614 -09:59:53.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00367 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5xD2bN1NyH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GWyVROxZEy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7cDjDJvIAw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZeTBJedf4R
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5469 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5519 to 46.7187 deg, Dec -15.3148 to -4.5794 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5519 to 46.7187 deg, Dec -15.3148 to -4.5794 deg
Loaded 4379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3511 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 5469 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.847200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.847200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5469 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5519 to 46.7187 deg, Dec -15.3148 to -4.5794 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5519 to 46.7187 deg, Dec -15.3148 to -4.5794 deg
Loaded 4379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3511 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 5469 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 5437 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5485 to 46.7187 deg, Dec -15.3252 to -4.5794 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5485 to 46.7187 deg, Dec -15.3252 to -4.5794 deg
Loaded 4383 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3489 out of 3613 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3613 out of 5437 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
2.0 pix Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
15.1 mag. Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5xD2bN1NyH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=346, bad_region=0, passed=5469
Got 5469 stars (including 5113 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5469 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5396 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5396 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=216 n_q2=261 n_q3=239 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits -region wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GWyVROxZEy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=355, bad_region=0, passed=5437
Got 5437 stars (including 5070 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5437 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5322 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5321 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5321 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=214 n_q2=261 n_q3=241 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.514
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits -region wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7cDjDJvIAw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=196, bad_region=0, passed=4201
Got 4201 stars (including 4001 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4201 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4137 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=243 n_q2=225 n_q3=266 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZeTBJedf4R (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=196, bad_region=0, passed=4231
Got 4231 stars (including 4029 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4231 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.222 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=242 n_q2=230 n_q3=264 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.056
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits sigma_overall=0.305 worst_q_ratio=1.193
ref2=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits sigma_overall=0.324 worst_q_ratio=1.514
new1=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits sigma_overall=0.270 worst_q_ratio=1.178
new2=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits sigma_overall=0.253 worst_q_ratio=1.056
reference average sigma_overall=0.3145 worst_q_ratio=1.3535
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853_astrometric_residuals.png (964 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:10:03.85 -04:58:08.6: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:10:03.85 -04:58:08.6: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20372.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20372_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
Preparing report for the candidate 20372_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
02:10:03.85 -04:58:08.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:18.006 -10:00:06.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:18.719 -09:59:54.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:18.006 -10:00:06.15
Second-epoch image center 02:34:18.719 -09:59:54.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0044 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:19.614 -09:59:53.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:18.006 -10:00:06.15
Second-epoch image center 02:34:19.614 -09:59:53.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0074 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:34:18.719 -09:59:54.39
Second-epoch second image center 02:34:19.614 -09:59:53.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00367 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MjP5FZls5f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FT2dqK2bg9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wHTDp9Feqa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pBANDgP6Or
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29449 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5488 to 46.7762 deg, Dec -15.3208 to -4.5605 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5488 to 46.7762 deg, Dec -15.3208 to -4.5605 deg
Loaded 4410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3528 out of 3767 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3767 out of 29449 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.750050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.750050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29449 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5488 to 46.7762 deg, Dec -15.3208 to -4.5605 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5488 to 46.7762 deg, Dec -15.3208 to -4.5605 deg
Loaded 4410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3528 out of 3767 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3767 out of 29449 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 29614 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5429 to 46.7757 deg, Dec -15.3321 to -4.5646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5429 to 46.7757 deg, Dec -15.3321 to -4.5646 deg
Loaded 4412 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3516 out of 3771 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3771 out of 29614 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 61 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
1.9 pix Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
15.2 mag. Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.MjP5FZls5f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=996, bad_region=22, passed=29438
Got 29438 stars (including 28362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29438 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.279 n_q1=216 n_q2=257 n_q3=242 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.227
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits -region wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FT2dqK2bg9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1056, bad_region=21, passed=29593
Got 29593 stars (including 28468 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29593 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29134 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=213 n_q2=255 n_q3=247 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.541
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits -region wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wHTDp9Feqa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=704, bad_region=14, passed=20592
Got 20592 stars (including 19847 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20592 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=247 n_q2=223 n_q3=266 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pBANDgP6Or (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=544, bad_region=12, passed=20134
Got 20134 stars (including 19541 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20134 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.223 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=245 n_q2=225 n_q3=264 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.071
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0853.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_061849_TTUQ1b1x1_1338409_IFUtoOV1/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:48:02.39 -12:25:53.1: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 03:03:08.96 -07:51:13.3: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:21:02.56 -05:32:42.6: 14.35 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:48:02.39 -12:25:53.1: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:48:02.39 -12:25:53.1: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5903 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:21:02.56 -05:32:42.6: 14.50 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 03:03:08.96 -07:51:13.3: 13.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:21:02.56 -05:32:42.6: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3827 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:03:08.96 -07:51:13.3: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8694 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 03:05:11.41 -06:00:01.0: 13.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:39:08.69 -09:48:18.3: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 03:05:11.41 -06:00:01.0: 13.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:05:11.41 -06:00:01.0: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5441 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:15:40.53 -05:26:57.8: 13.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:46:06.90 -07:20:24.2: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:39:08.69 -09:48:18.3: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:39:08.69 -09:48:18.3: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8154 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:15:40.53 -05:26:57.8: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:15:40.53 -05:26:57.8: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0300 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:46:06.90 -07:20:24.2: 13.98 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:46:06.90 -07:20:24.2: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9149 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:22:56.54 -08:40:27.6: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:22:56.54 -08:40:27.6: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:27:58.79 -08:31:52.7: 14.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:27:58.79 -08:31:52.7: 14.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:27:58.79 -08:31:52.7: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7263 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32965.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32109_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32109_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32111_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32111_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32202_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32202_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32206_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32206_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32208_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32208_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32211_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32211_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32227_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32227_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32232_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32232_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32234_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32234_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32238_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32238_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:10:03.87 -04:58:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32259_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32259_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32283_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32283_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32289_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32289_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:02:42.87 -07:39:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32316_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32316_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:13:15.21 -10:29:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32347_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32347_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32442_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32442_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32445_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32445_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32448_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32448_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32454_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32454_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32455_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32455_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32476_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32476_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32488_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32488_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32507_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32507_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32552_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32552_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32561_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32561_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32571_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32571_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32583_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32583_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32609_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32609_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32622_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32622_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32629_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32629_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32651_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32651_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32671_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32671_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32709_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32709_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32744_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32744_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32812_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32812_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32843_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32843_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32854_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32854_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32868_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32868_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32879_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32879_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32882_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32882_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32892_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32892_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32909_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32909_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32913_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32913_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32920_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32920_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32939_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32939_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32965_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
Preparing report for the candidate 32965_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32971_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32971_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32990_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32990_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32998_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 32998_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33003_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 33003_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33004_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 33004_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33009_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 33009_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33023_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 33023_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33025_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 33025_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33033_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 33033_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33047_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 33047_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33049_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 33049_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33053_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 33053_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33058_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 33058_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33060_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 33060_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33082_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854
The candidate 33082_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0854 did not pass the final checks