This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.4252 2461242.9252 12.13 00:01:32.61 -13:55:42.9
79.03866 -72.39993 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.23 Thalia -0 -1 1 12.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:01:32.61 -13:55:42.9: 14.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:01:32.61 -13:55:42.9: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.4252* 00 01 32.61 -13 55 42.9 12.1 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.9252,12.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.4252 12.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.4252 2461242.9252 12.96 23:53:47.74 -04:49:14.4
88.75960 -63.79983 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.113 Amalthea -0 -0 1 12.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 23:53:47.74 -04:49:14.4: 14.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 23:53:47.74 -04:49:14.4: 14.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.9252,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.4252 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.4252 2461242.9252 12.96 00:09:45.57 -09:52:24.9
91.29559 -70.14192 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.118 Peitho -1 -0 1 13.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:09:45.57 -09:52:24.9: 14.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:09:45.57 -09:52:24.9: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.4252* 00 09 45.57 -09 52 24.9 13.0 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.9252,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.4252 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.4252 2461242.9252 12.98 00:05:05.76 -13:51:03.7
81.46376 -72.87508 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.259 Aletheia 0 -0 0 13.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:05:05.76 -13:51:03.7: 14.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:05:05.76 -13:51:03.7: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.4252* 00 05 05.76 -13 51 03.7 13.0 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.9252,12.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.4252 12.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461191.93631795 31.05.2026 10:28:07.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
First image: 2461191.93631795 31.05.2026 10:28:07.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
Last image: 2461242.92554182 21.07.2026 10:12:36.813 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.73
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5181
Objects passed selection criteria: 5172
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3909
Average stars matched: 2954 (75.5692 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114124 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 21 06:09:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461191.93631795 31.05.2026 10:28:07.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
First image: 2461191.93631795 31.05.2026 10:28:07.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
Last image: 2461242.92554182 21.07.2026 10:12:36.813 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 32
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22357
Objects passed selection criteria: 22316
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 18900
Average stars matched: 15279.5 (80.8439 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 127052 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 21 06:12:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461242.92478889
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits'
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits'
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits'
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
Image size: 938.7'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:19.315 -09:58:50.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53
Second-epoch image center 00:00:19.315 -09:58:50.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0649 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:22.200 -09:59:28.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53
Second-epoch image center 00:00:22.200 -09:59:28.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0725 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:19.315 -09:58:50.49
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:22.200 -09:59:28.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01579 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DvMEtTMghV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nvFaZT5Sss
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qizz1phNLH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DL18qdfywK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 1896 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0006 to 359.9929 deg, Dec -15.2778 to -4.6540 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0006 to 359.9929 deg, Dec -15.2778 to -4.6540 deg
Loaded 168841 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1519 out of 1541 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 1541 out of 1896 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.417000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.417000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.73
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.69
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.69
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 1896 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0006 to 359.9929 deg, Dec -15.2778 to -4.6540 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0006 to 359.9929 deg, Dec -15.2778 to -4.6540 deg
Loaded 168841 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1519 out of 1541 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 1541 out of 1896 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits (aperture=6.7)
Read 2964 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0003 to 359.9948 deg, Dec -15.5331 to -4.3611 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0003 to 359.9948 deg, Dec -15.5331 to -4.3611 deg
Loaded 177681 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2425 out of 2446 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2446 out of 2964 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits (aperture=6.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
2.9 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
2.9 pix wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.7 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
14.1 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DvMEtTMghV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=196, bad_region=0, passed=1896
Got 1896 stars (including 1700 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1896 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0195 through 0 to 8.1581, gap 8.1581 to 352.0195
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0194 through 0 to 8.1585, gap 8.1585 to 352.0194
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.415 n_q1=234 n_q2=227 n_q3=246 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nvFaZT5Sss (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=164, bad_region=0, passed=2964
Got 2964 stars (including 2800 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2964 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6382 through 0 to 8.1600, gap 8.1600 to 351.6382
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6375 through 0 to 8.1604, gap 8.1604 to 351.6375
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=241 n_q2=210 n_q3=261 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.206
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qizz1phNLH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=267, bad_region=0, passed=5424
Got 5424 stars (including 5154 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5424 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7387 through 0 to 8.1975, gap 8.1975 to 351.7387
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7383 through 0 to 8.1978, gap 8.1978 to 351.7383
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5357 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5357 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.234 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.272 n_q1=236 n_q2=226 n_q3=253 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.198
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DL18qdfywK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=251, bad_region=0, passed=5451
Got 5451 stars (including 5195 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5451 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7422 through 0 to 8.2315, gap 8.2315 to 351.7422
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5392 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7416 through 0 to 8.2318, gap 8.2318 to 351.7416
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5391 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5391 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.233 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=239 n_q2=230 n_q3=248 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.198
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits sigma_overall=0.420 worst_q_ratio=1.103
ref2=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits sigma_overall=0.285 worst_q_ratio=1.206
new1=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits sigma_overall=0.283 worst_q_ratio=1.198
new2=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits sigma_overall=0.277 worst_q_ratio=1.198
reference average sigma_overall=0.3525 worst_q_ratio=1.1545
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_astrometric_residuals.png (942 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848_astrometric_residuals.png (940 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21130_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 21130_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:19:24.41 -08:51:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
Image size: 938.7'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:19.315 -09:58:50.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53
Second-epoch image center 00:00:19.315 -09:58:50.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0649 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:22.200 -09:59:28.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53
Second-epoch image center 00:00:22.200 -09:59:28.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0725 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:19.315 -09:58:50.49
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:22.200 -09:59:28.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01579 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g0zsKH0ISo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mkCDCuFkRP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oRtaU6SCyK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vw4owqXRKj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 12067 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0006 to 359.9978 deg, Dec -15.2876 to -4.6411 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0006 to 359.9978 deg, Dec -15.2876 to -4.6411 deg
Loaded 169181 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3550 out of 3632 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3632 out of 12067 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.224050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.224050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.80
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.80
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 12067 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0006 to 359.9978 deg, Dec -15.2876 to -4.6411 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0006 to 359.9978 deg, Dec -15.2876 to -4.6411 deg
Loaded 169181 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3550 out of 3632 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3632 out of 12067 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 15752 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0003 to 359.9974 deg, Dec -15.5533 to -4.2658 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0003 to 359.9974 deg, Dec -15.5533 to -4.2658 deg
Loaded 179384 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3573 out of 3658 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3658 out of 15752 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits (aperture=5.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 27 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
2.7 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
2.7 pix wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.8 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
14.2 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.g0zsKH0ISo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=343, bad_region=0, passed=12062
Got 12062 stars (including 11705 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12062 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9970 through 0 to 8.1581, gap 8.1581 to 351.9970
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9970 through 0 to 8.1585, gap 8.1585 to 351.9970
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=231 n_q2=241 n_q3=225 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mkCDCuFkRP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=467, bad_region=2, passed=15750
Got 15750 stars (including 15264 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15750 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6382 through 0 to 8.1600, gap 8.1600 to 351.6382
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15615 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6375 through 0 to 8.1604, gap 8.1604 to 351.6375
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15615 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15615 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.227 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.243 n_q1=236 n_q2=213 n_q3=254 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.253
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oRtaU6SCyK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=795, bad_region=27, passed=24127
Got 24127 stars (including 23279 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24127 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7031 through 0 to 8.2328, gap 8.2328 to 351.7031
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7025 through 0 to 8.2332, gap 8.2332 to 351.7025
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.233 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=236 n_q2=223 n_q3=247 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vw4owqXRKj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=866, bad_region=28, passed=24365
Got 24365 stars (including 23433 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24365 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7031 through 0 to 8.2326, gap 8.2326 to 351.7031
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7023 through 0 to 8.2330, gap 8.2330 to 351.7023
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24130 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24130 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.233 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=236 n_q2=224 n_q3=246 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0847.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_054958_TTUQ1b1x1_263074_U3x8Orsq/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 23:53:47.74 -04:49:14.4: 14.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:26:56.74 -14:40:52.7: 13.66 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:01:32.61 -13:55:42.9: 14.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:05:05.76 -13:51:03.7: 14.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:24:07.59 -15:04:32.1: 13.44 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:35.59 -14:35:55.0: 13.51 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:09:45.57 -09:52:24.9: 14.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:22.59 -12:35:36.5: 13.05 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:24:06.90 -14:59:56.9: 13.32 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 23:53:47.74 -04:49:14.4: 14.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:25:51.30 -14:37:06.8: 13.63 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:01:32.61 -13:55:42.9: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:30:35.59 -14:35:55.0: 13.49 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:35.59 -14:35:55.0: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.1234 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:26:56.74 -14:40:52.7: 13.37 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:05:05.76 -13:51:03.7: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:24:06.90 -14:59:56.9: 13.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:24:07.59 -15:04:32.1: 13.56 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:56.74 -14:40:52.7: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.9486 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:06.90 -14:59:56.9: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.2118 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:07.59 -15:04:32.1: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.2799 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:09:45.57 -09:52:24.9: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:30:22.59 -12:35:36.5: 13.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:22.59 -12:35:36.5: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.1777 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:25:51.30 -14:37:06.8: 13.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:51.30 -14:37:06.8: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.1800 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:22:49.69 -14:08:00.6: 13.51 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:29:19.47 -14:46:29.4: 13.65 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:40.62 -13:24:16.2: 13.51 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:21:36.71 -15:08:05.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:25:02.68 -14:59:16.7: 13.45 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:25:42.16 -14:08:12.2: 13.42 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:29:19.47 -14:46:29.4: 13.59 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:22:49.69 -14:08:00.6: 13.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:19.47 -14:46:29.4: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.2036 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:49.69 -14:08:00.6: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3249 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:25:02.68 -14:59:16.7: 13.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:30:40.62 -13:24:16.2: 13.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:21:36.71 -15:08:05.4: 13.85 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:36.71 -15:08:05.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:40.62 -13:24:16.2: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.1936 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:02.68 -14:59:16.7: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.2311 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:25:42.16 -14:08:12.2: 13.41 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:42.16 -14:08:12.2: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.1979 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:07.29 -11:06:47.6: 13.90 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:29:37.48 -14:54:01.5: 13.16 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:26:15.16 -15:03:48.5: 13.56 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:20.34 -13:49:28.8: 13.73 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:15.25 -13:58:30.5: 13.85 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:29:32.93 -13:25:17.2: 13.48 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:26:15.16 -15:03:48.5: 13.72 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:15.16 -15:03:48.5: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.2864 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:29:37.48 -14:54:01.5: 13.70 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:29:32.93 -13:25:17.2: 13.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:37.48 -14:54:01.5: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.2814 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:32.93 -13:25:17.2: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.2446 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:30:20.34 -13:49:28.8: 13.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:20.34 -13:49:28.8: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.2474 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:30:07.29 -11:06:47.6: 13.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:07.29 -11:06:47.6: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.3492 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:30:15.25 -13:58:30.5: 13.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:15.25 -13:58:30.5: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.2110 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:00.20 -14:55:13.4: 13.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:29:57.00 -14:41:14.4: 13.88 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:27:34.78 -14:16:21.2: 13.64 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:30:00.20 -14:55:13.4: 13.96 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.24
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:27:33.44 -13:50:32.8: 13.82 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:00.20 -14:55:13.4: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.24 new_mean_mag=13.3830 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:29:57.00 -14:41:14.4: 13.83 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:57.00 -14:41:14.4: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.3765 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:27:34.78 -14:16:21.2: 13.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:34.78 -14:16:21.2: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.2937 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:27:33.44 -13:50:32.8: 13.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:33.44 -13:50:32.8: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.3505 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24307.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24324.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24332.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24344.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24284_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 24284_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:19:24.42 -08:51:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24307_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
Preparing report for the candidate 24307_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24324_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
Preparing report for the candidate 24324_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24332_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
Preparing report for the candidate 24332_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24337_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 24337_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24344_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
Preparing report for the candidate 24344_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24369_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 24369_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24384_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 24384_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24387_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 24387_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24389_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 24389_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24394_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 24394_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24398_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 24398_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24399_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 24399_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24400_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 24400_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24403_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 24403_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24407_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 24407_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24410_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 24410_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24411_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 24411_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24418_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 24418_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24423_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 24423_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24424_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 24424_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24438_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 24438_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24441_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 24441_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24455_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 24455_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24462_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 24462_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24476_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 24476_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24489_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848
The candidate 24489_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-12-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0848 did not pass the final checks