This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.2753 2461242.7753 12.01 20:04:14.32 -14:19:13.6
27.83254 -22.46536 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.125 Liberatrix 0 -1 1 12.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:04:14.32 -14:19:13.6: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:04:14.32 -14:19:13.6: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.7753,12.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.2753 12.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.2753 2461242.7753 13.14 20:16:43.83 -18:30:39.8
24.85663 -26.84959 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1819 Laputa 0 0 0 13.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:16:43.83 -18:30:39.8: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:16:43.83 -18:30:39.8: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.2753* 20 16 43.83 -18 30 39.8 13.1 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.7753,13.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.2753 13.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.2753 2461242.7753 13.40 20:25:35.10 -15:52:52.1
28.49667 -27.81491 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.479 Caprera 0 -1 1 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:25:35.10 -15:52:52.1: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:25:35.10 -15:52:52.1: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.2753* 20 25 35.10 -15 52 52.1 13.4 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.7753,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.2753 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.2753 2461242.7753 13.91 20:08:06.78 -13:31:03.5
29.04154 -22.99916 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.190 Ismene 1 -1 2 14.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:08:06.78 -13:31:03.5: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:08:06.78 -13:31:03.5: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.2753* 20 08 06.78 -13 31 03.5 13.9 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.7753,13.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.2753 13.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.2753 2461242.7753 12.37 20:40:32.05 -17:03:27.8
28.80548 -31.57739 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" TX Cap
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.370 V < 15.100 V 2454306.00000 199.000000000000 M4e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:40:32.05 -17:03:27.8: 13.86 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:40:32.05 -17:03:27.8: 13.91 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.2753* 20 40 32.05 -17 03 27.8 12.4 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
TX Cap,2461242.7753,12.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
TX Cap 20260721.2753 12.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.2753 2461242.7753 12.64 20:07:16.47 -13:15:23.1
29.20994 -22.70634 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" DY Cap
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.500 V 14.700 V 2454799.00000 194.800000000000
The object was found in astcheck.6943 Moretto -137 447 467 17.1 0 0
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the predicted asteroid brightness, but the matched variable star above likely accounts for this object.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:07:16.47 -13:15:23.1: 13.73 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:07:16.47 -13:15:23.1: 13.74 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.2753* 20 07 16.47 -13 15 23.1 12.6 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DY Cap,2461242.7753,12.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DY Cap 20260721.2753 12.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
First image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Last image: 2461242.77565749 21.07.2026 06:36:46.807 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 17
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9997
Objects passed selection criteria: 9985
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9294.5
Average stars matched: 9096.25 (97.867 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118976 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 21 06:51:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
First image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Last image: 2461242.77565749 21.07.2026 06:36:46.807 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 70
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 39 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 69471
Objects passed selection criteria: 69318
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 61544
Average stars matched: 59848.2 (97.2447 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1926680 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 21 06:54:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461242.77493166
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:26.137 -18:02:54.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13
Second-epoch image center 20:26:26.137 -18:02:54.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0691 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:23.534 -18:02:46.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13
Second-epoch image center 20:26:23.534 -18:02:46.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0770 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:26:26.137 -18:02:54.42
Second-epoch second image center 20:26:23.534 -18:02:46.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01053 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WJKpUwrCzQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1cZlO0OVrq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PHLF9MZiQV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bEJR2w4pXI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10504 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Loaded 8345 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6582 out of 6781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6781 out of 10504 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.694350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.694350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.76
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.76
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10504 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Loaded 8345 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6582 out of 6781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6781 out of 10504 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 9446 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2411 to 315.1295 deg, Dec -23.2570 to -12.6183 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2411 to 315.1295 deg, Dec -23.2570 to -12.6183 deg
Loaded 8340 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6363 out of 6536 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6536 out of 9446 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.3 pix Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
3.6 pix fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
3.6 pix fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
14.6 mag. Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.WJKpUwrCzQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=584, bad_region=0, passed=10504
Got 10504 stars (including 9908 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10504 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10272 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.490 n_q1=215 n_q2=286 n_q3=220 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1cZlO0OVrq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=544, bad_region=0, passed=9446
Got 9446 stars (including 8894 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9446 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.576 n_q1=220 n_q2=286 n_q3=212 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PHLF9MZiQV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=361, bad_region=0, passed=8763
Got 8763 stars (including 8394 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8763 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=232 n_q2=242 n_q3=248 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bEJR2w4pXI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=345, bad_region=0, passed=8707
Got 8707 stars (including 8356 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8707 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=236 n_q2=240 n_q3=251 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits sigma_overall=0.437 worst_q_ratio=1.128
ref2=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits sigma_overall=0.492 worst_q_ratio=1.204
new1=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits sigma_overall=0.341 worst_q_ratio=1.219
new2=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits sigma_overall=0.333 worst_q_ratio=1.281
reference average sigma_overall=0.4645 worst_q_ratio=1.166
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641_astrometric_residuals.png (952 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:02:59.39 -17:20:26.7: 11.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:07:41.01 -15:35:31.5: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:58:21.44 -13:36:04.7: 11.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:16:55.97 -15:40:58.8: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:24:49.40 -19:33:11.1: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:16:19.21 -16:30:08.7: 12.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:18:36.56 -20:58:24.0: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:28:15.61 -13:47:58.2: 10.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:00:33.47 -20:58:21.5: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:00:01.34 -15:45:34.0: 12.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:02:59.39 -17:20:26.7: 11.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:02:59.39 -17:20:26.7: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8666 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:07:41.01 -15:35:31.5: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:58:21.44 -13:36:04.7: 11.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:16:55.97 -15:40:58.8: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:21.44 -13:36:04.7: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9344 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:41.01 -15:35:31.5: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0031 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:24:49.40 -19:33:11.1: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:55.97 -15:40:58.8: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9541 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:28:15.61 -13:47:58.2: 10.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:16:19.21 -16:30:08.7: 11.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:00:01.34 -15:45:34.0: 12.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:18:36.56 -20:58:24.0: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:00:33.47 -20:58:21.5: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:49.40 -19:33:11.1: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6672 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.90 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:15.61 -13:47:58.2: ref_mag=10.90 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3405 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:36.56 -20:58:24.0: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7287 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:19.21 -16:30:08.7: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8981 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:01.34 -15:45:34.0: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9862 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:33.47 -20:58:21.5: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9064 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:32:00.33 -17:19:18.5: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:33:37.37 -16:59:04.1: 11.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:19:19.92 -18:01:08.7: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:17:50.01 -17:41:24.4: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:32:00.33 -17:19:18.5: 11.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:00.33 -17:19:18.5: ref_mag=11.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9230 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:17:50.01 -17:41:24.4: 11.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:33:37.37 -16:59:04.1: 11.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:19:19.92 -18:01:08.7: 11.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:50.01 -17:41:24.4: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9508 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:37.37 -16:59:04.1: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9818 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:19.92 -18:01:08.7: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9705 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20200_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 20200_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20344_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 20344_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20429_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 20429_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20447_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 20447_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20449_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 20449_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20469_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 20469_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20473_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 20473_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20477_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 20477_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20495_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 20495_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20498_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 20498_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20501_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 20501_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20505_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 20505_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20529_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 20529_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20544_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 20544_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07212_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 07212_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:10.24 -15:53:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:26.137 -18:02:54.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13
Second-epoch image center 20:26:26.137 -18:02:54.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0691 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:23.534 -18:02:46.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13
Second-epoch image center 20:26:23.534 -18:02:46.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0770 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:26:26.137 -18:02:54.42
Second-epoch second image center 20:26:23.534 -18:02:46.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01053 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ecj0GnwEtz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9Kzbo21mbQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bqKy0UYHrO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jJDD7YWM5N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 76668 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2135 to 315.1318 deg, Dec -23.2769 to -12.6250 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2135 to 315.1318 deg, Dec -23.2769 to -12.6250 deg
Loaded 8367 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6610 out of 7336 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7336 out of 76668 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.552300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.552300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.93
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.93
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 76668 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2135 to 315.1318 deg, Dec -23.2769 to -12.6250 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2135 to 315.1318 deg, Dec -23.2769 to -12.6250 deg
Loaded 8367 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6610 out of 7336 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7336 out of 76668 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 71940 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2147 to 315.1367 deg, Dec -23.2606 to -12.6183 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2147 to 315.1367 deg, Dec -23.2606 to -12.6183 deg
Loaded 8360 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6652 out of 7330 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7330 out of 71940 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 62 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.1 pix Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
14.8 mag. Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ecj0GnwEtz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=4300, bad_region=1, passed=76649
Got 76649 stars (including 72232 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76649 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74534 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74534 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.488 n_q1=226 n_q2=279 n_q3=217 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9Kzbo21mbQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=3816, bad_region=0, passed=71923
Got 71923 stars (including 68005 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71923 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.628 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.569 n_q1=227 n_q2=279 n_q3=210 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.253
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bqKy0UYHrO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2626, bad_region=0, passed=49981
Got 49981 stars (including 47302 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49981 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=221 n_q2=236 n_q3=257 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.266
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jJDD7YWM5N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2529, bad_region=1, passed=49629
Got 49629 stars (including 47050 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49629 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=221 n_q2=239 n_q3=254 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.349
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0641.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_013735_TTUQ1b1x1_3943899_HpphV7gB/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:28:11.80 -19:15:15.4: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:57:57.61 -13:21:09.6: 13.70 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:33:21.75 -23:03:47.1: 13.37 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:12:10.15 -20:08:25.4: 13.46 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:04:44.84 -18:04:27.1: 13.69 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 19:56:14.43 -12:47:58.9: 14.37 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:26:11.34 -15:12:20.6: 14.06 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:24:22.62 -15:51:32.3: 13.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:58:22.99 -16:20:13.2: 13.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 19:55:26.56 -22:32:28.4: 12.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:57:57.61 -13:21:09.6: 13.66 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:33:21.75 -23:03:47.1: 13.37 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:28:11.80 -19:15:15.4: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:21.75 -23:03:47.1: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3175 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:57.61 -13:21:09.6: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.6364 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:11.80 -19:15:15.4: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3591 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 19:56:14.43 -12:47:58.9: 14.01 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:14.43 -12:47:58.9: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9698 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:12:10.15 -20:08:25.4: 13.64 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:58:22.99 -16:20:13.2: 13.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:10.15 -20:08:25.4: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5994 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:04:44.84 -18:04:27.1: 13.68 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:26:11.34 -15:12:20.6: 14.00 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:22.99 -16:20:13.2: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0783 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:44.84 -18:04:27.1: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6515 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:11.34 -15:12:20.6: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0629 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 19:55:26.56 -22:32:28.4: 12.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:26.56 -22:32:28.4: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6221 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:24:22.62 -15:51:32.3: 13.88 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:22.62 -15:51:32.3: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8975 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:58:37.41 -15:22:29.2: 12.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:58:36.16 -15:22:29.5: 12.66 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:58:21.44 -13:36:04.7: 12.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:58:40.48 -19:24:20.5: 12.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:53:16.09 -15:16:13.8: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:57:38.22 -19:38:17.2: 12.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 19:58:03.45 -12:44:49.7: 13.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:15:04.17 -16:07:05.1: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:04:14.32 -14:19:13.6: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:58:36.16 -15:22:29.5: 12.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:58:37.41 -15:22:29.2: 12.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:36.16 -15:22:29.5: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7496 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:58:21.44 -13:36:04.7: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 19:58:58.78 -13:18:42.4: 13.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:37.41 -15:22:29.2: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6803 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:21.44 -13:36:04.7: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9944 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:58:40.48 -19:24:20.5: 12.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:40.48 -19:24:20.5: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4685 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:57:38.22 -19:38:17.2: 12.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:53:16.09 -15:16:13.8: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:38.22 -19:38:17.2: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3487 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:16.09 -15:16:13.8: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7348 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 19:58:03.45 -12:44:49.7: 13.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:03.45 -12:44:49.7: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8959 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:04:14.32 -14:19:13.6: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 19:58:58.78 -13:18:42.4: 13.56 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:15:04.17 -16:07:05.1: 12.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:58.78 -13:18:42.4: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4278 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:04.17 -16:07:05.1: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9743 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 19:56:46.44 -16:36:05.8: 13.59 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:35:18.84 -13:34:36.5: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 19:59:00.70 -13:17:32.5: 13.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:16:43.83 -18:30:39.8: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:25:35.10 -15:52:52.1: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:19:48.88 -14:16:01.3: 13.49 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:35:18.84 -13:34:36.5: 13.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:29:22.20 -23:09:32.9: 13.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:06:10.41 -13:26:42.1: 13.54 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 19:56:46.44 -16:36:05.8: 13.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:18.84 -13:34:36.5: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3240 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:46.44 -16:36:05.8: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2587 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 19:59:00.70 -13:17:32.5: 13.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:00.70 -13:17:32.5: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5218 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:16:43.83 -18:30:39.8: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:19:48.88 -14:16:01.3: 13.59 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:25:35.10 -15:52:52.1: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:48.88 -14:16:01.3: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5844 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:06:10.41 -13:26:42.1: 13.72 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:10.41 -13:26:42.1: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6277 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:29:22.20 -23:09:32.9: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:22.20 -23:09:32.9: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2081 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:57:54.99 -18:06:43.7: 13.63 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:13:44.17 -14:12:50.3: 13.55 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:15:31.43 -14:23:10.5: 13.73 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 19:56:29.38 -13:00:19.2: 14.45 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:15:31.43 -14:23:10.5: 13.80 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:31.43 -14:23:10.5: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8250 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:08:06.78 -13:31:03.5: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 19:53:10.38 -21:03:19.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:57:54.99 -18:06:43.7: 13.73 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:57:37.78 -13:20:43.1: 14.21 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:54.99 -18:06:43.7: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4885 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:13:44.17 -14:12:50.3: 13.60 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 19:56:29.38 -13:00:19.2: 14.31 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:13:44.17 -14:12:50.3: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7162 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:29.38 -13:00:19.2: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9301 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:08:06.78 -13:31:03.5: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 19:53:10.38 -21:03:19.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:10.38 -21:03:19.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:57:37.78 -13:20:43.1: 14.25 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:37.78 -13:20:43.1: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.9212 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:05:16.48 -12:50:32.3: 14.40 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:55:55.91 -13:39:47.6: 14.37 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:04:57.83 -16:24:19.2: 14.38 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 19:56:19.43 -13:26:47.7: 14.64 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:05:16.48 -12:50:32.3: 14.34 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:16.48 -12:50:32.3: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0682 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:02:00.04 -12:59:13.8: 13.89 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:55:55.91 -13:39:47.6: 14.39 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:04:57.83 -16:24:19.2: 14.65 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:55.91 -13:39:47.6: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0523 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 19:56:19.43 -13:26:47.7: 14.53 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:57.83 -16:24:19.2: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0279 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:19.43 -13:26:47.7: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.1527 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:02:00.04 -12:59:13.8: 13.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:02:00.04 -12:59:13.8: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0623 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:56:01.37 -15:53:50.2: 14.34 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:54:41.72 -14:14:48.9: 14.53 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:56:01.37 -15:53:50.2: 14.15 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:01.37 -15:53:50.2: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9244 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 19:56:35.05 -13:32:04.1: 14.68 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:58:31.54 -15:32:23.6: 14.39 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:54:41.72 -14:14:48.9: 14.37 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:41.72 -14:14:48.9: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9909 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:58:17.62 -15:08:50.0: 14.02 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:07:58.02 -15:57:15.8: 14.66 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:58:17.62 -15:08:50.0: 14.18 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:17.62 -15:08:50.0: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0590 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 19:56:35.05 -13:32:04.1: 14.70 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:35.05 -13:32:04.1: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3102 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:58:31.54 -15:32:23.6: 14.23 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:07:58.02 -15:57:15.8: 14.33 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:31.54 -15:32:23.6: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0581 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:58.02 -15:57:15.8: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0765 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:57:32.51 -13:44:12.8: 14.29 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:55:25.60 -13:43:04.9: 14.58 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:57:32.51 -13:44:12.8: 13.99 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:32.51 -13:44:12.8: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1409 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:55:25.60 -13:43:04.9: 14.62 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:25.60 -13:43:04.9: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.1888 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:57:23.92 -16:25:23.2: 14.26 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:35:55.25 -13:44:34.9: 14.31 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:44:25.78 -13:57:00.5: 14.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:57:44.57 -14:49:31.4: 14.40 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:57:23.92 -16:25:23.2: 14.31 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:23.92 -16:25:23.2: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.9976 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:35:55.25 -13:44:34.9: 14.46 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:44:25.78 -13:57:00.5: 14.43 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:55.25 -13:44:34.9: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4365 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:25.78 -13:57:00.5: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2771 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:57:44.57 -14:49:31.4: 14.43 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:44.57 -14:49:31.4: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0447 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:07:16.47 -13:15:23.1: 13.73 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:40:32.05 -17:03:27.8: 13.86 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:07:16.47 -13:15:23.1: 13.74 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:07:16.47 -13:15:23.1: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.6365 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_04-08-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits at 20:40:32.05 -17:03:27.8: 13.91 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:40:32.05 -17:03:27.8: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.3677 delta=1.51 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out42413.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out47567.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91575.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92263.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92404.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92700.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91250_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 91250_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91258_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 91258_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91268_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 91268_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91274_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 91274_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91277_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 91277_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91280_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 91280_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91282_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 91282_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91288_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 91288_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91304_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 91304_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91309_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 91309_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91310_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 91310_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91311_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 91311_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91314_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 91314_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91316_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 91316_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91317_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 91317_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91319_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 91319_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91575_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
Preparing report for the candidate 91575_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91908_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 91908_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92062_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92062_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92216_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92216_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92257_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92257_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92263_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
Preparing report for the candidate 92263_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92269_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92269_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92270_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92270_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92297_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92297_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:26:13.19 -13:47:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92404_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
Preparing report for the candidate 92404_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92450_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92450_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92484_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92484_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92487_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92487_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92493_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92493_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:08.48 -14:47:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92521_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92521_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92533_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92533_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92617_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92617_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92664_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92664_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:19:51.73 -14:02:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92692_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92692_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92697_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92697_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92700_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
Preparing report for the candidate 92700_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92717_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92717_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92724_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92724_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92759_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92759_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92760_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92760_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92766_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92766_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92775_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92775_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:01.78 -12:46:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92780_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92780_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92837_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92837_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92839_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92839_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92851_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92851_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92870_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92870_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92875_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92875_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92888_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92888_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92892_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92892_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92899_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92899_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92902_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92902_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92925_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92925_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92970_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92970_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92991_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 92991_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62608_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 62608_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:01:13.16 -14:06:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58155_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 58155_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:12.25 -16:48:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47955_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 47955_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:03.22 -13:19:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42413_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
Preparing report for the candidate 42413_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73043_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642
The candidate 73043_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-36-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0642 did not pass the final checks
