This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.1223 2461242.6223 9.18 19:02:18.27 -22:36:24.6
13.67397 -12.37000 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.8 Flora 1 -0 1 9.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:02:18.27 -22:36:24.6: 15.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:02:18.27 -22:36:24.6: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.6223,9.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.1223 9.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.1223 2461242.6223 11.32 18:58:16.01 -28:05:08.1
8.15663 -13.77237 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis 0 1 1 11.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:58:16.01 -28:05:08.1: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:58:16.01 -28:05:08.1: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.6223,11.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.1223 11.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.1223 2461242.6223 11.68 18:38:03.75 -27:40:36.4
6.63185 -9.54516 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.6 pix
The object was found in VSX22" Gaia DR3 4072485005099654656
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
19.520 G 20.020 G 0.314502000000
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.37 Fides 0 -0 1 11.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:38:03.75 -27:40:36.4: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:38:03.75 -27:40:36.4: 14.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4072485005099654656,2461242.6223,11.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4072485005099654656 20260721.1223 11.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.1223 2461242.6223 11.35 19:07:15.66 -30:13:32.1
6.90917 -16.41514 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia 1 1 2 11.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:15.66 -30:13:32.1: 15.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:07:15.66 -30:13:32.1: 14.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.6223,11.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.1223 11.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.1223 2461242.6223 12.78 19:35:49.94 -22:02:13.2
17.41384 -19.26222 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.182 Elsa 1 2 3 12.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:35:49.94 -22:02:13.2: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:35:49.94 -22:02:13.2: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.6223,12.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.1223 12.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.1223 2461242.6223 13.36 19:05:14.56 -26:57:31.6
9.85847 -14.74240 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2013 Tucapel 1 1 1 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:05:14.56 -26:57:31.6: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:05:14.56 -26:57:31.6: 15.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.6223,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.1223 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.1223 2461242.6223 12.48 18:50:18.18 -24:20:52.7
10.88370 -10.60147 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.407 Arachne 1 1 1 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:18.18 -24:20:52.7: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:50:18.18 -24:20:52.7: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.6223,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.1223 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
First image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Last image: 2461242.62258968 21.07.2026 02:56:21.748 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10573
Objects passed selection criteria: 10545
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8051.5
Average stars matched: 7959.25 (98.8543 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 120144 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 20 22:00:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
First image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Last image: 2461242.62258968 21.07.2026 02:56:21.748 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 55
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 81 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 114251
Objects passed selection criteria: 114038
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 94887.5
Average stars matched: 92922 (97.9286 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1896812 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 20 22:05:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461242.62193645
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Image size: 943.4'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:57.505 -26:02:29.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:11:57.505 -26:02:29.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0405 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Image size: 943.4'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:58.364 -26:01:46.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:11:58.364 -26:01:46.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0282 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:11:57.505 -26:02:29.49
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:58.364 -26:01:46.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01235 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Nq8QQrq7h2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fJgofczzDG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yQN5Mc7oNN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits &> /tmp/tmp.N70hO57Flj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.554850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.554850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 10687 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9561 to 297.0874 deg, Dec -31.2647 to -20.5650 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9561 to 297.0874 deg, Dec -31.2647 to -20.5650 deg
Loaded 13339 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7826 out of 8095 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8095 out of 10687 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.2 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Nq8QQrq7h2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=984, bad_region=0, passed=13260
Got 13260 stars (including 12254 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13023 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.634 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.734 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.581 n_q1=250 n_q2=210 n_q3=220 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fJgofczzDG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=726, bad_region=0, passed=10687
Got 10687 stars (including 9950 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10687 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.645 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.784 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.703 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.673 n_q1=246 n_q2=203 n_q3=223 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yQN5Mc7oNN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=391, bad_region=0, passed=4161
Got 4161 stars (including 3765 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4161 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013103 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010482 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1021)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.828 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.517 n_q1=262 n_q2=140 n_q3=284 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.541
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.N70hO57Flj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, bad_region=0, passed=4355
Got 4355 stars (including 3963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4355 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013103 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010482 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4227 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4227 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4222 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.889 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.506 n_q1=261 n_q2=142 n_q3=288 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.705
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits sigma_overall=0.575 worst_q_ratio=1.277
ref2=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits sigma_overall=0.645 worst_q_ratio=1.215
new1=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits sigma_overall=0.537 worst_q_ratio=1.541
new2=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits sigma_overall=0.521 worst_q_ratio=1.705
reference average sigma_overall=0.61 worst_q_ratio=1.246
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055_astrometric_residuals.png (936 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.59 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433_astrometric_residuals.png (928 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434_astrometric_residuals.png (931 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:02:18.27 -22:36:24.6: 15.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:02:18.27 -22:36:24.6: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20199.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20199_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
Preparing report for the candidate 20199_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:02:18.27 -22:36:24.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Image size: 943.4'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:57.505 -26:02:29.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:11:57.505 -26:02:29.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0405 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Image size: 943.4'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:58.364 -26:01:46.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:11:58.364 -26:01:46.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0282 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:11:57.505 -26:02:29.49
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:58.364 -26:01:46.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01235 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5qrupkUMz6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qdqButALor
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SOSo1L78wt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B03zZB2K3s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.361800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.361800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 118893 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9129 to 297.0888 deg, Dec -31.2647 to -20.5527 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9129 to 297.0888 deg, Dec -31.2647 to -20.5527 deg
Loaded 13400 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10023 out of 11609 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11609 out of 118893 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 52 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.3 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5qrupkUMz6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=13408, bad_region=0, passed=145618
Got 145618 stars (including 131996 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 145618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.772 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.568 n_q1=257 n_q2=216 n_q3=187 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.344
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qdqButALor (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=8799, bad_region=0, passed=118877
Got 118877 stars (including 109929 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 118877 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 117212 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 117211 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 117210 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.766 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.712 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.697 n_q1=260 n_q2=202 n_q3=203 n_q4=276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SOSo1L78wt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2179, bad_region=3, passed=57975
Got 57975 stars (including 55699 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57975 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013103 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010482 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.864 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.545 n_q1=273 n_q2=148 n_q3=269 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.505
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.B03zZB2K3s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2246, bad_region=1, passed=59995
Got 59995 stars (including 57643 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59995 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013103 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010482 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.584 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.914 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.576 n_q1=268 n_q2=154 n_q3=273 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.565
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-55-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_215705_TTUQ1b1x1_866432_gm4ckUp0/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:06:29.45 -26:08:05.0: 12.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:47.14 -23:47:58.1: 13.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:06:24.94 -23:14:51.7: 12.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:00.95 -28:16:44.0: 12.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:49:55.09 -21:58:00.4: 13.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:06:29.45 -26:08:05.0: 12.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:29.45 -26:08:05.0: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8084 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:56:47.14 -23:47:58.1: 13.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:47.14 -23:47:58.1: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2975 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:49:55.09 -21:58:00.4: 12.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:06:24.94 -23:14:51.7: 12.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:59:00.95 -28:16:44.0: 12.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:49:55.09 -21:58:00.4: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3093 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:24.94 -23:14:51.7: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5440 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:00.95 -28:16:44.0: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6592 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:38:03.75 -27:40:36.4: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:58:16.01 -28:05:08.1: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:15.66 -30:13:32.1: 15.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:02.06 -25:56:49.7: 11.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:38:03.75 -27:40:36.4: 14.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:58:16.01 -28:05:08.1: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:07:15.66 -30:13:32.1: 14.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:50:02.06 -25:56:49.7: 11.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:02.06 -25:56:49.7: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0653 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:09.35 -24:39:13.5: 12.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:49.14 -25:03:32.6: 13.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:08:49.29 -24:26:02.6: 12.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:45:53.16 -28:57:49.0: 12.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:35:49.94 -22:02:13.2: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:50:09.35 -24:39:13.5: 12.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:09.35 -24:39:13.5: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8695 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:59:49.14 -25:03:32.6: 13.07 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:49.14 -25:03:32.6: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8635 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:08:49.29 -24:26:02.6: 12.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:08:49.29 -24:26:02.6: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7166 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:35:49.94 -22:02:13.2: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:45:53.16 -28:57:49.0: 12.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:53.16 -28:57:49.0: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6771 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:54:04.46 -24:01:24.4: 13.38 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:05:14.56 -26:57:31.6: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:47:01.09 -25:01:36.4: 13.63 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:51:11.91 -25:00:14.9: 12.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:54:04.46 -24:01:24.4: 13.39 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:54:04.46 -24:01:24.4: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2921 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:05:14.56 -26:57:31.6: 15.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:47:01.09 -25:01:36.4: 13.35 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:18.18 -24:20:52.7: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:01.09 -25:01:36.4: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.5204 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:51:11.91 -25:00:14.9: 13.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:51:11.91 -25:00:14.9: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9097 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:50:18.18 -24:20:52.7: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161745.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161794.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161797.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out162848.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out163133.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91236.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161410_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 161410_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:17.56 -30:12:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161413_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 161413_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161414_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 161414_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161426_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 161426_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:33.51 -24:00:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161428_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 161428_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161436_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 161436_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161441_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 161441_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:27.39 -21:30:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161448_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 161448_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:01.58 -30:58:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161449_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 161449_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:54.47 -26:23:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161451_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 161451_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161456_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 161456_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:08.03 -29:44:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161457_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 161457_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:29.51 -27:30:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161461_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 161461_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:43.82 -24:40:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161464_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 161464_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:12.88 -20:42:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161466_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 161466_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:59.81 -29:41:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161484_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 161484_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:18.26 -22:36:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161690_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 161690_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:18.07 -23:17:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161745_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
Preparing report for the candidate 161745_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161794_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
Preparing report for the candidate 161794_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161797_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
Preparing report for the candidate 161797_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161895_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 161895_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:01.70 -21:22:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161935_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 161935_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:27.91 -22:23:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161990_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 161990_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:28.31 -25:56:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162020_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 162020_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162214_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 162214_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:04.93 -24:22:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162358_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 162358_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:07.81 -31:01:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162382_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 162382_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:35.55 -21:30:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162444_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 162444_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:39.72 -21:39:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162448_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 162448_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:35.76 -22:18:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162529_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 162529_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:04.69 -22:23:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162576_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 162576_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:21.64 -21:14:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162579_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 162579_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:42.12 -22:09:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162580_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 162580_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:59.61 -30:58:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162618_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 162618_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:17.92 -25:10:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162661_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 162661_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162690_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 162690_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162699_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 162699_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162747_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 162747_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162848_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
Preparing report for the candidate 162848_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162856_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 162856_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:10.78 -25:29:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162868_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 162868_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:38.71 -21:52:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162913_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 162913_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:09.37 -23:24:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162950_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 162950_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:34.37 -25:37:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163027_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 163027_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:18.44 -27:40:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163050_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 163050_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:01.32 -30:01:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163081_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 163081_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163133_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
Preparing report for the candidate 163133_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163142_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 163142_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158544_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 158544_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91236_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
Preparing report for the candidate 91236_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156893_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 156893_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:01.42 -23:10:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156824_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434
The candidate 156824_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_21-56-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434 did not pass the final checks
