This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.2739 2461241.7739 9.32 20:47:15.74 -27:26:17.8
17.51316 -36.33617 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.324 Bamberga 1 1 1 9.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:47:15.74 -27:26:17.8: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:47:15.74 -27:26:17.8: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 20.2739* 20 47 15.74 -27 26 17.8 9.3 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.7739,9.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.2739 9.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.2739 2461241.7739 12.54 20:55:48.18 -29:47:28.1
15.18626 -38.71189 galactic Mic Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.769 Tatjana 0 0 0 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:55:48.18 -29:47:28.1: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:55:48.18 -29:47:28.1: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 20.2739* 20 55 48.18 -29 47 28.1 12.5 U Mic 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.7739,12.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.2739 12.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.2739 2461241.7739 12.61 20:57:59.30 -25:02:00.5
21.22259 -38.01972 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.388 Charybdis -0 1 1 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:57:59.30 -25:02:00.5: 14.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:57:59.30 -25:02:00.5: 14.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 20.2739* 20 57 59.30 -25 02 00.5 12.6 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.7739,12.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.2739 12.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.2739 2461241.7739 13.61 20:57:34.01 -25:09:37.0
21.03474 -37.96254 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.325 Heidelberga -1 2 2 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:57:34.01 -25:09:37.0: 14.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:57:34.01 -25:09:37.0: 14.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 20.2739* 20 57 34.01 -25 09 37.0 13.6 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.7739,13.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.2739 13.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.82423715 17.06.2026 07:46:44.090 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
First image: 2461208.82423715 17.06.2026 07:46:44.090 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Last image: 2461241.77422229 20.07.2026 06:34:42.806 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 3937
Objects passed selection criteria: 3935
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3817.25
Average stars matched: 3668 (96.0901 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113628 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 20 05:12:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.82423715 17.06.2026 07:46:44.090 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
First image: 2461208.82423715 17.06.2026 07:46:44.090 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Last image: 2461241.77422229 20.07.2026 06:34:42.806 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 170
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.99
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 36 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 28944
Objects passed selection criteria: 28876
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 27758.5
Average stars matched: 26474.2 (95.3735 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 137624 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 20 05:16:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461241.77350189
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:06:59.939 -25:59:26.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:11.403 -25:59:52.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:06:59.939 -25:59:26.19
Second-epoch image center 21:07:11.403 -25:59:52.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0435 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:08.020 -26:00:13.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:06:59.939 -25:59:26.19
Second-epoch image center 21:07:08.020 -26:00:13.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0330 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:07:11.403 -25:59:52.21
Second-epoch second image center 21:07:08.020 -26:00:13.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01394 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits &> /tmp/tmp.u5fW1oNbUo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fCg1pRlPpv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LSNNXO7yZS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VsV0D0GHfO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 4590 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7573 to 325.7549 deg, Dec -31.2624 to -20.5568 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7573 to 325.7549 deg, Dec -31.2624 to -20.5568 deg
Loaded 7064 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3816 out of 3873 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3873 out of 4590 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.445150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.445150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.12
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.12
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 4590 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7573 to 325.7549 deg, Dec -31.2624 to -20.5568 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7573 to 325.7549 deg, Dec -31.2624 to -20.5568 deg
Loaded 7064 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3816 out of 3873 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3873 out of 4590 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 4645 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7571 to 325.7547 deg, Dec -31.2444 to -20.5156 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7571 to 325.7547 deg, Dec -31.2444 to -20.5156 deg
Loaded 7088 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3849 out of 3914 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3914 out of 4645 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
2.3 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
14.1 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.u5fW1oNbUo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=305, bad_region=905, passed=4590
Got 4590 stars (including 3428 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4590 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.358 n_q1=326 n_q2=169 n_q3=313 n_q4=169 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fCg1pRlPpv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=311, bad_region=919, passed=4645
Got 4645 stars (including 3467 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4645 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.361 n_q1=319 n_q2=167 n_q3=320 n_q4=171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LSNNXO7yZS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=341, bad_region=932, passed=4911
Got 4911 stars (including 3715 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4911 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=331 n_q2=164 n_q3=313 n_q4=159 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VsV0D0GHfO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=354, bad_region=914, passed=4876
Got 4876 stars (including 3687 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4876 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.432 n_q1=328 n_q2=166 n_q3=314 n_q4=161 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.229
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.159
ref2=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.232
new1=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits sigma_overall=0.406 worst_q_ratio=1.236
new2=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits sigma_overall=0.443 worst_q_ratio=1.229
reference average sigma_overall=0.3735 worst_q_ratio=1.1955
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:40:46.06 -27:35:30.7: 11.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:47:15.74 -27:26:17.8: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:01:25.84 -23:03:17.2: 11.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:40:46.06 -27:35:30.7: 11.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:47:15.74 -27:26:17.8: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:01:25.84 -23:03:17.2: 11.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:46.06 -27:35:30.7: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2553 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:25.84 -23:03:17.2: ref_mag=11.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2057 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20223.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20223_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 20223_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20228_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20228_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:54:26.50 -27:44:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20230_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20230_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20232_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20232_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:47:15.74 -27:26:17.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:06:59.939 -25:59:26.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:11.403 -25:59:52.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:06:59.939 -25:59:26.19
Second-epoch image center 21:07:11.403 -25:59:52.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0435 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:08.020 -26:00:13.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:06:59.939 -25:59:26.19
Second-epoch image center 21:07:08.020 -26:00:13.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0330 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:07:11.403 -25:59:52.21
Second-epoch second image center 21:07:08.020 -26:00:13.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01394 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q13xJBiJDk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dG39aMMdff
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ucilIHZ6je
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0lv5Hq7BwY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32517 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7104 to 325.8372 deg, Dec -31.2627 to -20.5198 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7104 to 325.8372 deg, Dec -31.2627 to -20.5198 deg
Loaded 7143 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5715 out of 6003 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6003 out of 32517 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.281900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.281900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.99
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32517 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7104 to 325.8372 deg, Dec -31.2627 to -20.5198 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7104 to 325.8372 deg, Dec -31.2627 to -20.5198 deg
Loaded 7143 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5715 out of 6003 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6003 out of 32517 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 32635 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7102 to 325.8938 deg, Dec -31.2487 to -20.4986 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7102 to 325.8938 deg, Dec -31.2487 to -20.4986 deg
Loaded 7165 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5705 out of 6017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6017 out of 32635 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 67 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
2.2 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
14.3 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Q13xJBiJDk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1030, bad_region=4439, passed=32510
Got 32510 stars (including 27141 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32510 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28559 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=327 n_q2=166 n_q3=304 n_q4=175 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dG39aMMdff (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1093, bad_region=4442, passed=32628
Got 32628 stars (including 27234 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32628 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.345 n_q1=327 n_q2=165 n_q3=303 n_q4=177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.255
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ucilIHZ6je (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1336, bad_region=6153, passed=33732
Got 33732 stars (including 26429 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33732 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28275 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28275 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28275 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=335 n_q2=183 n_q3=281 n_q4=171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.385
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0lv5Hq7BwY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1315, bad_region=6229, passed=34184
Got 34184 stars (including 26817 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34184 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28665 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28665 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28665 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.429 n_q1=340 n_q2=188 n_q3=274 n_q4=167 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.198
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-33-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_013620_TTUQ2b1x1_3340378_mXMqpQBB/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:42:18.76 -25:02:59.7: 12.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:52:10.87 -28:44:11.2: 12.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:14:11.31 -29:30:30.9: 13.41 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:22:11.63 -29:30:44.2: 13.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:25:13.15 -28:33:30.3: 13.40 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:54:28.74 -30:07:56.9: 13.99 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:18:20.38 -29:30:07.1: 13.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:10:12.11 -26:08:18.2: 13.55 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:35:52.55 -30:03:19.3: 13.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:18:04.84 -25:10:59.1: 13.69 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:52:10.87 -28:44:11.2: 12.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:14:11.31 -29:30:30.9: 13.51 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:42:18.76 -25:02:59.7: 12.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:18:20.38 -29:30:07.1: 13.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:10:12.11 -26:08:18.2: 13.45 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:25:13.15 -28:33:30.3: 13.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:10.87 -28:44:11.2: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1737 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:54:28.74 -30:07:56.9: 14.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:22:11.63 -29:30:44.2: 13.75 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:14:11.31 -29:30:30.9: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.3972 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:18:04.84 -25:10:59.1: 14.12 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:18:20.38 -29:30:07.1: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5317 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:18.76 -25:02:59.7: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1992 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:10:12.11 -26:08:18.2: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.8303 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:35:52.55 -30:03:19.3: 14.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:25:13.15 -28:33:30.3: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4837 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:28.74 -30:07:56.9: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6973 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:11.63 -29:30:44.2: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7233 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:18:04.84 -25:10:59.1: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7125 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:52.55 -30:03:19.3: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7781 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:27:13.38 -28:55:29.5: 13.65 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:55:48.18 -29:47:28.1: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:57:59.30 -25:02:00.5: 14.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:26:19.99 -25:38:57.1: 12.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:07:48.70 -29:33:05.4: 12.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:02:51.28 -28:55:55.6: 12.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:26:47.35 -29:41:55.9: 13.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:26:21.61 -29:39:49.1: 13.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:25:52.99 -30:10:56.3: 13.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:26:17.36 -29:51:13.5: 14.19 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:57:59.30 -25:02:00.5: 14.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:27:13.38 -28:55:29.5: 13.43 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:26:19.99 -25:38:57.1: 12.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:13.38 -28:55:29.5: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5210 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:55:48.18 -29:47:28.1: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:19.99 -25:38:57.1: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6981 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:02:51.28 -28:55:55.6: 12.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:07:48.70 -29:33:05.4: 12.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:51.28 -28:55:55.6: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0188 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:07:48.70 -29:33:05.4: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5491 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:26:47.35 -29:41:55.9: 14.06 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:47.35 -29:41:55.9: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4687 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:26:21.61 -29:39:49.1: 13.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:21.61 -29:39:49.1: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3918 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:25:52.99 -30:10:56.3: 13.53 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:25:52.99 -30:10:56.3: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5977 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:26:17.36 -29:51:13.5: 14.17 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:17.36 -29:51:13.5: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.6856 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:23:08.26 -29:35:19.2: 14.13 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:21:24.82 -29:38:09.0: 13.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:27:28.82 -29:47:55.0: 14.34 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:24:33.18 -29:51:55.1: 13.95 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:21:20.47 -28:53:16.8: 14.15 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:27:28.82 -29:47:55.0: 13.53 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:14:58.47 -28:42:53.7: 13.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:17:33.64 -30:13:28.5: 13.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:28.82 -29:47:55.0: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6475 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:21:24.82 -29:38:09.0: 14.00 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:21:20.47 -28:53:16.8: 13.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:46:30.69 -30:02:39.7: 14.30 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:24:33.18 -29:51:55.1: 14.01 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:21:24.82 -29:38:09.0: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5080 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:21:20.47 -28:53:16.8: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7081 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:24:33.18 -29:51:55.1: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7323 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:23:08.26 -29:35:19.2: 14.13 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:23:08.26 -29:35:19.2: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6846 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:17:33.64 -30:13:28.5: 13.94 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:14:58.47 -28:42:53.7: 13.68 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:17:33.64 -30:13:28.5: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7366 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:14:58.47 -28:42:53.7: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6585 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:46:30.69 -30:02:39.7: 13.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:30.69 -30:02:39.7: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7825 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:22:56.18 -29:16:07.4: 14.01 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:25:58.48 -29:22:31.1: 13.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:26:51.69 -30:05:57.4: 14.23 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:23:43.65 -28:13:19.9: 13.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:26:18.21 -26:06:19.0: 13.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:19:27.54 -29:09:16.2: 13.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:57:34.01 -25:09:37.0: 14.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:22:56.18 -29:16:07.4: 13.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:56.18 -29:16:07.4: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7091 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:25:58.48 -29:22:31.1: 13.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:26:18.21 -26:06:19.0: 14.08 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:26:51.69 -30:05:57.4: 14.06 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:18.21 -26:06:19.0: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7500 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:21:21.37 -30:08:14.1: 14.01 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:25:58.48 -29:22:31.1: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8355 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:51.69 -30:05:57.4: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.7609 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:23:43.65 -28:13:19.9: 13.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:23:43.65 -28:13:19.9: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7431 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:19:27.54 -29:09:16.2: 14.28 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:19:27.54 -29:09:16.2: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8388 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:57:34.01 -25:09:37.0: 14.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:21:21.37 -30:08:14.1: 14.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:21:21.37 -30:08:14.1: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8236 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:23:13.05 -28:35:30.8: 13.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:55:46.04 -29:55:39.0: 14.14 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:17:21.31 -23:42:31.1: 13.50 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:16:03.99 -29:30:04.7: 13.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:12:39.57 -30:03:17.5: 14.25 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:21:57.46 -25:02:11.2: 14.50 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:52:37.47 -28:55:39.1: 14.07 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:23:13.05 -28:35:30.8: 13.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:17:21.31 -23:42:31.1: 13.68 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:23:13.05 -28:35:30.8: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8458 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:17:21.31 -23:42:31.1: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.6329 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:12:39.57 -30:03:17.5: 13.97 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:55:46.04 -29:55:39.0: 13.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:12:39.57 -30:03:17.5: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.9280 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:16:03.99 -29:30:04.7: 13.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:46.04 -29:55:39.0: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7348 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:16:03.99 -29:30:04.7: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6811 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:21:57.46 -25:02:11.2: 14.28 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:21:57.46 -25:02:11.2: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.7927 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:52:37.47 -28:55:39.1: 13.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:37.47 -28:55:39.1: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8473 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:04:42.58 -30:09:08.8: 13.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:22:22.10 -28:13:31.2: 14.51 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:17:31.95 -29:45:41.2: 13.97 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:52:54.58 -28:52:12.5: 14.29 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:25:07.46 -29:35:52.6: 14.24 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:16:21.57 -29:33:01.2: 14.35 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:39:47.03 -29:52:48.1: 14.04 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:22:22.10 -28:13:31.2: 13.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:04:42.58 -30:09:08.8: 14.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:22.10 -28:13:31.2: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8399 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:42.58 -30:09:08.8: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7117 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:17:31.95 -29:45:41.2: 13.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:52:54.58 -28:52:12.5: 14.13 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:17:31.95 -29:45:41.2: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8876 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:54.58 -28:52:12.5: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7374 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:25:07.46 -29:35:52.6: 13.65 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:25:07.46 -29:35:52.6: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8153 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:16:21.57 -29:33:01.2: 14.37 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:16:21.57 -29:33:01.2: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.9414 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:39:47.03 -29:52:48.1: 14.41 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:47.03 -29:52:48.1: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.9245 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:21:19.40 -30:00:39.3: 13.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:38:21.39 -28:09:11.5: 13.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:18:43.26 -27:55:33.5: 13.72 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:26:37.35 -28:39:55.9: 13.99 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:25:08.10 -27:50:55.0: 14.29 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:21:19.40 -30:00:39.3: 14.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:43:41.59 -29:44:32.8: 14.15 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:15:14.85 -29:06:00.0: 14.24 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:38:21.39 -28:09:11.5: 13.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:21:19.40 -30:00:39.3: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=13.7956 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:21.39 -28:09:11.5: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8284 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:18:43.26 -27:55:33.5: 14.07 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:26:37.35 -28:39:55.9: 14.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:18:43.26 -27:55:33.5: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8097 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:37.35 -28:39:55.9: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7538 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:25:08.10 -27:50:55.0: 14.25 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:25:08.10 -27:50:55.0: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.7276 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:15:14.85 -29:06:00.0: 14.05 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:43:41.59 -29:44:32.8: 14.08 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:15:14.85 -29:06:00.0: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8382 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:41.59 -29:44:32.8: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8211 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:25:41.14 -29:04:38.0: 14.44 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:41:08.41 -29:59:06.9: 13.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:38:46.22 -28:59:33.4: 14.15 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:11:26.17 -26:49:13.0: 13.97 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:47:00.26 -26:54:45.7: 14.21 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:25:41.14 -29:04:38.0: 14.22 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:25:41.14 -29:04:38.0: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.8941 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:40:24.59 -22:03:23.0: 14.36 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:41:08.41 -29:59:06.9: 14.08 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:08.41 -29:59:06.9: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.9069 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:38:46.22 -28:59:33.4: 14.07 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:11:26.17 -26:49:13.0: 13.80 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:11:26.17 -26:49:13.0: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8424 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:46.22 -28:59:33.4: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8000 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:47:00.26 -26:54:45.7: 14.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:00.26 -26:54:45.7: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8605 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:40:24.59 -22:03:23.0: 14.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:24.59 -22:03:23.0: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8100 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52378.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52382.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52518.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52306_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52306_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52310_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52310_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52313_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52313_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52315_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52315_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52322_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52322_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52323_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52323_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52324_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52324_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52328_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52328_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52329_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52329_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52336_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52336_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52339_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52339_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52343_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52343_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52344_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52344_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52349_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52349_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:47:15.74 -27:26:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52378_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 52378_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52380_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52380_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:14:45.50 -27:58:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52382_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 52382_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52418_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52418_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52420_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52420_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52432_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52432_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52446_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52446_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52454_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52454_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52455_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52455_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52456_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52456_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52459_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52459_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52460_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52460_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52462_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52462_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52471_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52471_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52484_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52484_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52486_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52486_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52490_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52490_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52495_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52495_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52503_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52503_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52506_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52506_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52511_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52511_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52512_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52512_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52515_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52515_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52518_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 52518_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52524_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52524_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52529_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52529_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52533_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52533_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52536_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52536_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52538_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52538_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52539_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52539_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52561_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52561_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52562_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52562_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52564_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52564_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52570_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52570_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52571_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52571_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52576_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52576_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52579_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52579_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52584_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52584_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52585_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52585_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52590_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52590_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52592_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52592_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52593_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52593_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52598_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52598_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52600_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52600_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52603_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52603_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52607_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52607_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52612_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52612_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52616_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52616_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52619_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52619_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52665_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52665_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52699_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52699_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52806_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52806_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08641_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 08641_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_01-34-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks