This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.2172 2461241.7172 12.14 16:10:24.24 -09:39:48.8
2.61635 29.36948 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.28 Bellona -0 -0 0 12.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:10:24.24 -09:39:48.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:10:24.24 -09:39:48.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.7172,12.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.2172 12.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.2172 2461241.7172 12.57 16:18:21.79 -13:08:53.8
0.94679 25.66067 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 0 -1 1 12.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:21.79 -13:08:53.8: 15.73 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:21.79 -13:08:53.8: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.73 +/- 0.36
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.7172,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.2172 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.2172 2461241.7172 12.79 16:26:48.93 -14:28:20.4
1.22893 23.23217 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.119 Althaea 1 0 1 12.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:48.93 -14:28:20.4: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:48.93 -14:28:20.4: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.7172,12.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.2172 12.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.2172 2461241.7172 13.54 15:55:34.74 -05:33:56.9
3.67042 34.79942 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 10.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.97 Klotho 0 0 0 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:55:34.74 -05:33:56.9: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:55:34.74 -05:33:56.9: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.7172,13.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.2172 13.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.2172 2461241.7172 13.65 16:32:51.93 -14:46:00.2
1.95912 21.90027 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 10.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.412 Elisabetha 2 0 2 13.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:51.93 -14:46:00.2: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:51.93 -14:46:00.2: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.7172,13.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.2172 13.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.2172 2461241.7172 14.19 15:53:09.12 -08:08:02.0
0.81243 33.62764 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.323 Brucia 1 1 1 14.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:53:09.12 -08:08:02.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:53:09.12 -08:08:02.0: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.7172,14.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.2172 14.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.7172,14.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.2172 14.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
First image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Last image: 2461241.71756009 20.07.2026 05:13:07.192 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7823
Objects passed selection criteria: 7822
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7397
Average stars matched: 7263 (98.1885 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116880 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 20 00:27:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
First image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Last image: 2461241.71756009 20.07.2026 05:13:07.192 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 66
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 41 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 63041
Objects passed selection criteria: 62914
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 59703.2
Average stars matched: 57867.5 (96.9252 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 167708 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 20 00:30:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461241.71691862
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.834 -09:58:06.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:08.834 -09:58:06.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0216 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:11.789 -09:58:46.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:11.789 -09:58:46.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0188 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:08.834 -09:58:06.69
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:11.789 -09:58:46.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01637 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SrYADoW3fQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aRId92zYqz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iOVlgxjAWl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7EbMcfUnVY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5208 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4041 out of 4212 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4212 out of 8279 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.855300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.855300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5208 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4041 out of 4212 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4212 out of 8279 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4983 deg, Dec -15.5992 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4983 deg, Dec -15.5992 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5222 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4038 out of 4215 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4215 out of 8296 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.2 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.SrYADoW3fQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=513, bad_region=0, passed=8279
Got 8279 stars (including 7758 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=229 n_q2=245 n_q3=218 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aRId92zYqz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=538, bad_region=0, passed=8296
Got 8296 stars (including 7747 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8133 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8133 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=234 n_q2=244 n_q3=214 n_q4=277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.267
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iOVlgxjAWl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=390, bad_region=0, passed=6637
Got 6637 stars (including 6245 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6637 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=224 n_q2=258 n_q3=218 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.084
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7EbMcfUnVY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=393, bad_region=0, passed=6618
Got 6618 stars (including 6212 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6507 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6509 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6509 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=230 n_q2=253 n_q3=216 n_q4=272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.237
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits sigma_overall=0.340 worst_q_ratio=1.118
ref2=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits sigma_overall=0.350 worst_q_ratio=1.267
new1=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits sigma_overall=0.420 worst_q_ratio=1.084
new2=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits sigma_overall=0.431 worst_q_ratio=1.237
reference average sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.1925
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:59.45 -08:07:31.7: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:10:24.24 -09:39:48.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:59.45 -08:07:31.7: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:59.45 -08:07:31.7: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8688 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:10:24.24 -09:39:48.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20518.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20510_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20510_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:41.87 -14:41:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20512_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20512_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20516_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20516_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.32 -06:11:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20518_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 20518_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02078_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 02078_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:21:24.44 -07:42:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02024_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 02024_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:23.18 -07:56:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:10:24.24 -09:39:48.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.834 -09:58:06.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:08.834 -09:58:06.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0216 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:11.789 -09:58:46.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:11.789 -09:58:46.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0188 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:08.834 -09:58:06.69
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:11.789 -09:58:46.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01637 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IUWDfx63uV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gIXMgWxUUo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits &> /tmp/tmp.No4WfUfHbX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zWl6lTTH5w
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 66506 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Loaded 5302 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3766 out of 4287 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4287 out of 66506 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.698250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.698250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 66506 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Loaded 5302 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3766 out of 4287 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4287 out of 66506 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 66556 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8754 to 252.4982 deg, Dec -15.6070 to -4.1798 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8754 to 252.4982 deg, Dec -15.6070 to -4.1798 deg
Loaded 5296 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3783 out of 4283 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4283 out of 66556 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 62 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.0 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
2.0 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
15.3 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.IUWDfx63uV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=3301, bad_region=1, passed=66487
Got 66487 stars (including 63074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=231 n_q2=251 n_q3=220 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gIXMgWxUUo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=3301, bad_region=1, passed=66529
Got 66529 stars (including 63096 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66529 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=233 n_q2=248 n_q3=220 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.No4WfUfHbX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=2680, bad_region=6, passed=53720
Got 53720 stars (including 50937 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53720 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=227 n_q2=257 n_q3=214 n_q4=269 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zWl6lTTH5w (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2687, bad_region=9, passed=54064
Got 54064 stars (including 51257 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 54064 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.363 n_q1=229 n_q2=255 n_q3=213 n_q4=273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-12-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001351_TTUQ1b1x1_3938328_1LVaFeLf/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:35:55.61 -10:31:25.2: 13.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:32.65 -10:40:57.2: 14.70 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:02:46.28 -04:43:45.2: 14.62 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:11:05.36 -06:57:15.7: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:16.90 -11:45:50.8: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:05:09.13 -07:24:41.6: 14.23 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:25:29.86 -06:05:37.1: 15.06 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:29:17.15 -10:06:29.6: 14.33 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:35:55.61 -10:31:25.2: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:32.65 -10:40:57.2: 14.46 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:55.61 -10:31:25.2: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1727 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:02:46.28 -04:43:45.2: 14.71 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:37:38.34 -09:14:10.6: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:32.65 -10:40:57.2: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3865 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:46.28 -04:43:45.2: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7260 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:16.90 -11:45:50.8: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:11:05.36 -06:57:15.7: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:16.90 -11:45:50.8: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6008 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:05.36 -06:57:15.7: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2540 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:05:09.13 -07:24:41.6: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:09.13 -07:24:41.6: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3462 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:00:03.26 -14:10:39.6: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:29:17.15 -10:06:29.6: 14.29 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:17.15 -10:06:29.6: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4884 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:25:29.86 -06:05:37.1: 14.90 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:29.86 -06:05:37.1: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6898 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:37:38.34 -09:14:10.6: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:38.34 -09:14:10.6: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8009 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:00:03.26 -14:10:39.6: 14.07 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:03.26 -14:10:39.6: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0990 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:24.76 -10:31:06.6: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:51:19.02 -10:40:42.7: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:24:21.87 -12:36:07.3: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:48:54.52 -07:32:28.5: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:15:10.91 -05:18:26.8: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:52:03.98 -05:19:03.7: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:24.76 -10:31:06.6: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:24.76 -10:31:06.6: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9303 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:44:57.87 -13:41:41.2: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:24:21.87 -12:36:07.3: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:21.87 -12:36:07.3: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0423 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:51:19.02 -10:40:42.7: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:19.02 -10:40:42.7: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9775 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:21.79 -13:08:53.8: 15.73 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:48:54.52 -07:32:28.5: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:54.52 -07:32:28.5: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9979 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:15:10.91 -05:18:26.8: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:52:03.98 -05:19:03.7: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:10.91 -05:18:26.8: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8732 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:03.98 -05:19:03.7: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6137 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:44:57.87 -13:41:41.2: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:57.87 -13:41:41.2: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3816 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:48.93 -14:28:20.4: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:21.79 -13:08:53.8: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.73 +/- 0.36
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:18:21.79 -13:08:53.8: ref_mag=15.73 +/- 0.36 new_mean_mag=12.5701 delta=3.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:55:34.74 -05:33:56.9: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:52.01 -07:08:15.9: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:51.93 -14:46:00.2: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:48.93 -14:28:20.4: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:39.22 -08:42:29.0: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:55:34.74 -05:33:56.9: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:59:59.24 -07:06:44.6: 14.10 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:52.01 -07:08:15.9: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:53:09.12 -08:08:02.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:52.01 -07:08:15.9: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4974 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:51.93 -14:46:00.2: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:39.22 -08:42:29.0: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:59:59.24 -07:06:44.6: 14.16 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:39.22 -08:42:29.0: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8784 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:59.24 -07:06:44.6: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1154 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:53:09.12 -08:08:02.0: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:56:27.14 -04:59:47.7: 15.38 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:47:33.40 -08:16:29.4: 15.05 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:56:27.14 -04:59:47.7: 15.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:27.14 -04:59:47.7: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5066 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:48:49.42 -06:11:34.7: 14.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:38:26.86 -11:41:19.4: 15.26 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:47:33.40 -08:16:29.4: 15.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:33.40 -08:16:29.4: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5221 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:48:49.42 -06:11:34.7: 15.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:49.42 -06:11:34.7: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6613 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:38:26.86 -11:41:19.4: 15.05 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:26.86 -11:41:19.4: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6969 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:39:07.74 -06:59:20.6: 15.18 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:39:09.44 -13:05:13.7: 15.01 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:39:07.74 -06:59:20.6: 15.48 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:07.74 -06:59:20.6: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7264 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:45:12.18 -09:32:01.0: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:29:45.20 -14:38:41.5: 14.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:39:09.44 -13:05:13.7: 15.17 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:09.44 -13:05:13.7: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5503 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:45:12.18 -09:32:01.0: 14.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:12.18 -09:32:01.0: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6208 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:29:45.20 -14:38:41.5: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:45.20 -14:38:41.5: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6569 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:45:34.84 -08:20:15.8: 14.98 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:08:41.66 -14:29:26.1: 15.09 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:45:34.84 -08:20:15.8: 15.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:34.84 -08:20:15.8: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6509 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:25:19.02 -07:57:49.4: 14.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:08:41.66 -14:29:26.1: 15.21 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:41.66 -14:29:26.1: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5733 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:24:46.78 -13:22:50.7: 14.70 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:25:19.02 -07:57:49.4: 14.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:19.02 -07:57:49.4: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7722 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:24:46.78 -13:22:50.7: 14.71 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:46.78 -13:22:50.7: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5421 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:52:48.45 -09:57:17.7: 15.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:48:28.70 -08:29:23.0: 15.05 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:41:41.22 -09:22:48.4: 15.31 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:52:48.45 -09:57:17.7: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:48.45 -09:57:17.7: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8437 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:23:22.93 -14:41:11.4: 14.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:41:41.22 -09:22:48.4: 14.88 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:41.22 -09:22:48.4: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8390 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:48:28.70 -08:29:23.0: 14.99 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:28.70 -08:29:23.0: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6528 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:23:22.93 -14:41:11.4: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:23:22.93 -14:41:11.4: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7495 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:47:09.26 -07:44:16.8: 15.15 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:57:42.21 -14:31:33.3: 15.06 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:11:12.80 -14:10:49.0: 15.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:47:09.26 -07:44:16.8: 14.80 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:39.27 -09:48:31.3: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:09.26 -07:44:16.8: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5828 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:57:42.21 -14:31:33.3: 14.97 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:42.21 -14:31:33.3: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6394 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:09:05.85 -14:07:30.6: 15.23 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:39.27 -09:48:31.3: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:11:12.80 -14:10:49.0: 15.53 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:39.27 -09:48:31.3: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8320 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:12.80 -14:10:49.0: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7525 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:09:05.85 -14:07:30.6: 15.08 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:05.85 -14:07:30.6: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8774 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82608.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82614.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82650.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82663.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82718.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82504_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82504_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82506_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82506_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82520_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82520_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82530_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82530_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82537_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82537_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82548_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82548_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82550_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82550_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82551_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82551_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82559_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82559_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82562_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82562_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82566_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82566_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82568_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82568_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82570_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82570_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82571_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82571_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82572_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82572_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82576_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82576_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82577_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82577_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82583_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82583_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82585_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82585_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82588_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82588_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:02.65 -08:43:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82604_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82604_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:24.24 -09:39:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82608_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 82608_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82614_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 82614_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82638_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82638_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:30.59 -12:31:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82650_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 82650_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82654_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82654_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82659_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82659_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:52.16 -10:03:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82663_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 82663_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82686_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82686_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:13.99 -06:26:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82690_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82690_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82717_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82717_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82718_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 82718_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82729_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82729_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:56.81 -13:05:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82754_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 82754_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82779_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82779_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82785_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82785_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82803_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82803_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82811_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82811_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82814_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82814_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82819_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82819_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82833_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82833_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82834_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82834_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82841_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82841_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82844_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82844_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82845_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82845_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82848_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82848_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82866_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82866_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82884_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82884_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82889_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82889_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82890_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82890_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82896_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82896_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:26.45 -06:56:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82898_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82898_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82901_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82901_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82912_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82912_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82934_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82934_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82949_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82949_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09726_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 09726_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:48.83 -06:46:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32325_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 32325_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:54.28 -09:46:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48353_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 48353_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:41.87 -14:41:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17622_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 17622_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:23.17 -07:56:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53453_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 53453_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:13:19.76 -13:31:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17754_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 17754_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_00-13-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
