This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.1233 2461241.6233 10.60 15:43:52.43 -28:01:38.4
343.20284 21.05584 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.29 Amphitrite 0 -1 1 10.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 15:43:52.43 -28:01:38.4: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 15:43:52.43 -28:01:38.4: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.6233,10.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.1233 10.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.1233 2461241.6233 10.82 15:57:22.31 -20:41:06.6
351.06056 24.34565 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.21 Lutetia 0 -0 0 11.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 15:57:22.31 -20:41:06.6: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 15:57:22.31 -20:41:06.6: 15.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.6233,10.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.1233 10.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.1233 2461241.6233 12.54 16:02:27.96 -21:19:40.8
351.47199 23.04767 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.24 Themis 1 -1 1 12.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:02:27.96 -21:19:40.8: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:02:27.96 -21:19:40.8: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.6233,12.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.1233 12.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.1233 2461241.6233 13.06 15:51:46.90 -25:25:21.7
346.48092 21.82502 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.674 Rachele 2 -0 2 13.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 15:51:46.90 -25:25:21.7: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 15:51:46.90 -25:25:21.7: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.6233,13.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.1233 13.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.1233 2461241.6233 13.30 16:26:41.28 -25:42:21.8
352.09112 16.00281 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.175 Andromache 2 0 2 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:26:41.28 -25:42:21.8: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:26:41.28 -25:42:21.8: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.6233,13.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.1233 13.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.1233 2461241.6233 13.34 16:25:57.75 -23:02:39.8
354.06409 17.88701 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.121 Hermione 2 1 2 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:25:57.75 -23:02:39.8: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:25:57.75 -23:02:39.8: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.6233,13.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.1233 13.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.1233 2461241.6233 13.35 16:25:28.57 -27:19:09.3
350.65686 15.12705 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.108 Hecuba 2 -1 2 13.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:25:28.57 -27:19:09.3: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:25:28.57 -27:19:09.3: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.6233,13.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.1233 13.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.1233 2461241.6233 13.71 16:11:22.82 -24:10:57.4
350.79849 19.58683 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.8" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.481 Emita 1 -0 1 14.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:11:22.82 -24:10:57.4: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:11:22.82 -24:10:57.4: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.6233,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.1233 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461205.74478639 14.06.2026 05:52:19.544 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
First image: 2461205.74478639 14.06.2026 05:52:19.544 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Last image: 2461241.62354039 20.07.2026 02:57:43.890 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7555
Objects passed selection criteria: 7549
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6614.5
Average stars matched: 6453.25 (97.5622 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116828 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 19 22:01:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461205.74478639 14.06.2026 05:52:19.544 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
First image: 2461205.74478639 14.06.2026 05:52:19.544 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Last image: 2461241.62354039 20.07.2026 02:57:43.890 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 78
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.89
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 33 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 75388
Objects passed selection criteria: 75258
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 63299.8
Average stars matched: 61131.2 (96.5742 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1995084 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 19 22:04:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461241.62298406
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Image size: 941.2'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:11.495 -25:59:08.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:02.358 -26:01:46.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:11.495 -25:59:08.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:02.358 -26:01:46.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0555 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:04.383 -26:02:17.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:11.495 -25:59:08.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:04.383 -26:02:17.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0589 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:02.358 -26:01:46.30
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:04.383 -26:02:17.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01159 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bH6dQjQLFc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eppv28bQHl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6GxNDmfgRY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mLeiJHGWVh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8280 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3888 to 253.5783 deg, Dec -31.4733 to -20.0780 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3888 to 253.5783 deg, Dec -31.4733 to -20.0780 deg
Loaded 8529 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5455 out of 5650 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5650 out of 8280 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.642300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.642300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.49
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.49
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8280 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3888 to 253.5783 deg, Dec -31.4733 to -20.0780 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3888 to 253.5783 deg, Dec -31.4733 to -20.0780 deg
Loaded 8529 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5455 out of 5650 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5650 out of 8280 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (aperture=5.8)
Read 8132 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.4159 to 253.5795 deg, Dec -31.4777 to -20.1160 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.4159 to 253.5795 deg, Dec -31.4777 to -20.1160 deg
Loaded 8512 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5410 out of 5601 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5601 out of 8132 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
2.3 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
3.1 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
3.1 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
14.5 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.bH6dQjQLFc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=612, bad_region=0, passed=8280
Got 8280 stars (including 7650 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8280 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8025 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.373 n_q1=153 n_q2=241 n_q3=283 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eppv28bQHl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=620, bad_region=1, passed=8132
Got 8132 stars (including 7493 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8132 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=152 n_q2=242 n_q3=291 n_q4=272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.174
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6GxNDmfgRY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=375, bad_region=0, passed=5028
Got 5028 stars (including 4648 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5028 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.437 n_q1=284 n_q2=283 n_q3=242 n_q4=151 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.355
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mLeiJHGWVh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=341, bad_region=0, passed=5251
Got 5251 stars (including 4904 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5251 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5106 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5106 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=288 n_q2=281 n_q3=245 n_q4=148 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.445
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits sigma_overall=0.393 worst_q_ratio=1.297
ref2=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits sigma_overall=0.400 worst_q_ratio=1.174
new1=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits sigma_overall=0.418 worst_q_ratio=1.355
new2=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.445
reference average sigma_overall=0.3965 worst_q_ratio=1.2355
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165_astrometric_residuals.png (957 matched stars from wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 15:43:52.43 -28:01:38.4: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 15:57:22.31 -20:41:06.6: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 15:57:22.31 -20:41:06.6: 15.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 15:43:52.43 -28:01:38.4: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20586.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20590.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20586_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 20586_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20590_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 20590_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20594_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 20594_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:11.51 -28:27:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20600_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 20600_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:18:47.36 -28:45:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20605_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 20605_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:56.79 -27:54:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03356_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 03356_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:35.04 -26:31:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
15:43:52.43 -28:01:38.4
15:57:22.31 -20:41:06.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Image size: 941.2'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:11.495 -25:59:08.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:02.358 -26:01:46.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:11.495 -25:59:08.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:02.358 -26:01:46.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0555 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:04.383 -26:02:17.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:11.495 -25:59:08.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:04.383 -26:02:17.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0589 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:02.358 -26:01:46.30
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:04.383 -26:02:17.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01159 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GwbydzvJwS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WEJTSpA0Rb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WffCeFzRsx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lksj8EFUr2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 83603 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3429 to 253.5796 deg, Dec -31.4740 to -20.0424 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3429 to 253.5796 deg, Dec -31.4740 to -20.0424 deg
Loaded 8584 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6230 out of 6972 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6972 out of 83603 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.490400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.490400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.89
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.60
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.60
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 83603 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3429 to 253.5796 deg, Dec -31.4740 to -20.0424 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3429 to 253.5796 deg, Dec -31.4740 to -20.0424 deg
Loaded 8584 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6230 out of 6972 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6972 out of 83603 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 83601 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3430 to 253.5841 deg, Dec -31.4846 to -20.0617 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3430 to 253.5841 deg, Dec -31.4846 to -20.0617 deg
Loaded 8587 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6196 out of 6980 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6980 out of 83601 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 70 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
2.2 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
14.6 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.GwbydzvJwS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=4520, bad_region=3, passed=83596
Got 83596 stars (including 78919 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 83596 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80327 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=155 n_q2=259 n_q3=280 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WEJTSpA0Rb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=4524, bad_region=6, passed=83586
Got 83586 stars (including 78883 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 83586 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80047 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80046 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=155 n_q2=263 n_q3=281 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WffCeFzRsx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1753, bad_region=3, passed=42971
Got 42971 stars (including 41138 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42971 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.459 n_q1=269 n_q2=277 n_q3=265 n_q4=155 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.361
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lksj8EFUr2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1757, bad_region=4, passed=44924
Got 44924 stars (including 43090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44924 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=273 n_q2=279 n_q3=260 n_q4=158 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.419
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-56-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-19_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_215854_TTUQ1b1x1_260467_h1CTv4Vp/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:12:36.87 -29:08:41.6: 12.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:09:36.35 -28:00:41.3: 13.36 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 15:43:22.58 -30:08:32.5: 12.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:50:32.77 -26:40:14.2: 13.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:32:51.19 -26:19:33.7: 13.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:09:36.35 -28:00:41.3: 13.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:36.35 -28:00:41.3: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2503 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:32:51.19 -26:19:33.7: 13.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:50:32.77 -26:40:14.2: 13.29 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:12:36.87 -29:08:41.6: 13.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 15:43:22.58 -30:08:32.5: 12.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:51.19 -26:19:33.7: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0571 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:32.77 -26:40:14.2: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2772 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:36.87 -29:08:41.6: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0072 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:22.58 -30:08:32.5: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8769 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:02:27.96 -21:19:40.8: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:02:27.96 -21:19:40.8: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:41:33.84 -27:05:32.2: 12.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 15:51:46.90 -25:25:21.7: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:05:42.79 -21:49:26.7: 13.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:26:41.28 -25:42:21.8: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:25:28.57 -27:19:09.3: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:41:33.84 -27:05:32.2: 12.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 15:51:46.90 -25:25:21.7: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:25:57.75 -23:02:39.8: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:33.84 -27:05:32.2: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9252 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:05:42.79 -21:49:26.7: 13.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:42.79 -21:49:26.7: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9854 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:26:41.28 -25:42:21.8: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:25:28.57 -27:19:09.3: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:25:57.75 -23:02:39.8: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:11:22.82 -24:10:57.4: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:11:22.82 -24:10:57.4: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101905.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102046.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102089.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102110.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102112.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102134.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101771_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 101771_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101773_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 101773_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101775_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 101775_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101783_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 101783_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:15.94 -26:24:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101784_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 101784_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101787_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 101787_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101791_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 101791_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:58.73 -28:33:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101792_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 101792_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:56.84 -26:40:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101802_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 101802_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:46.74 -28:47:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101804_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 101804_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:00.52 -23:41:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101817_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 101817_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:43:52.45 -28:01:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101819_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 101819_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:57:22.31 -20:41:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101841_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 101841_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:23.91 -28:11:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101855_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 101855_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:17.31 -28:44:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101867_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 101867_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:26.99 -26:31:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101890_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 101890_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:19:24.60 -22:21:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101905_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 101905_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101920_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 101920_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:39.90 -23:14:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101922_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 101922_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:45:51.76 -25:29:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101941_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 101941_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:24:42.58 -29:43:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101942_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 101942_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:36.03 -23:15:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101949_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 101949_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:38.77 -27:28:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101995_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 101995_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:42.91 -25:43:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102003_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 102003_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:00.03 -28:29:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102021_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 102021_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:16.67 -26:00:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102032_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 102032_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102034_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 102034_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:13:51.32 -24:25:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102039_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 102039_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102046_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 102046_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102077_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 102077_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:39.28 -30:59:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102078_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 102078_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:09:34.78 -27:53:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102080_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 102080_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:52.21 -30:09:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102083_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 102083_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:33:54.86 -30:39:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102089_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 102089_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102093_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 102093_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:42.81 -23:18:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102105_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 102105_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:28.81 -29:05:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102110_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 102110_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102112_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 102112_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102122_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 102122_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:21.87 -21:57:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102125_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 102125_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:32.13 -21:38:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102127_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 102127_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:44.82 -23:43:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102130_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 102130_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:20.07 -29:18:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102134_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 102134_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77182_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 77182_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:56.82 -27:54:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100152_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100152_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:35:42.23 -24:05:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81716_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 81716_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:40.95 -27:54:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42330_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 42330_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:33:47.48 -26:44:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18253_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 18253_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:19:41.60 -23:24:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54243_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 54243_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:11.51 -28:27:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67136_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 67136_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:26.42 -30:01:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97735_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 97735_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:51.20 -22:42:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29104_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 29104_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:36:49.85 -25:16:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37127_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 37127_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:54.56 -26:16:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97263_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 97263_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:18:47.35 -28:45:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27581_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 27581_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:10.10 -24:14:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29336_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 29336_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:14.66 -25:04:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12580_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 12580_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:52.36 -22:49:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93814_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 93814_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:42.90 -29:42:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93687_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 93687_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:45.95 -25:32:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16635_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 16635_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:58:15.62 -22:44:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29438_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 29438_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:49.81 -24:42:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22964_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 22964_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:26.14 -24:06:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83055_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 83055_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:18:54.54 -27:29:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58315_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 58315_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:40.80 -29:53:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76748_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 76748_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:31.82 -28:12:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31038_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 31038_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:25.47 -25:33:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58398_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 58398_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:33.32 -29:41:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68696_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 68696_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:44.70 -29:25:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98580_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 98580_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:06.00 -29:24:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70028_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 70028_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-19_21-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
