This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 18.4234* 21 31 21.18 -18 10 42.1 11.4 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.9234,11.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.4234 11.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 18.4234* 21 31 21.09 -18 10 40.6 11.8 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.9234,11.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.4234 11.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.4234 2461239.9234 13.09 21:07:25.86 -18:28:02.2
30.01460 -38.05843 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.462 Eriphyla 0 1 1 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:07:25.86 -18:28:02.2: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:07:25.86 -18:28:02.2: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 18.4234* 21 07 25.86 -18 28 02.2 13.1 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.9234,13.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.4234 13.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.4234 2461239.9234 13.88 21:42:02.40 -14:14:57.7
39.36447 -44.16078 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.653 Berenike 1 0 1 14.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:42:02.40 -14:14:57.7: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:42:02.40 -14:14:57.7: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 18.4234* 21 42 02.40 -14 14 57.7 13.9 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.9234,13.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.4234 13.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.4234 2461239.9234 14.31 21:09:23.79 -16:07:49.0
32.98841 -37.64773 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.569 Misa -0 1 1 14.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:09:23.79 -16:07:49.0: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:09:23.79 -16:07:49.0: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 18.4234* 21 09 23.79 -16 07 49.0 14.3 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.9234,14.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.4234 14.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.4234 2461239.9234 14.21 21:14:36.39 -13:46:39.7
36.34987 -37.88836 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1860 Barbarossa 1 1 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:14:36.39 -13:46:39.7: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:14:36.39 -13:46:39.7: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.9234,14.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.4234 14.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
First image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Last image: 2461239.92366880 18.07.2026 10:09:54.984 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6915
Objects passed selection criteria: 6908
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6333.25
Average stars matched: 6163.75 (97.3236 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115928 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 17 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-157-gbf7d0e63
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-17)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jul 18 08:15:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
First image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Last image: 2461239.92366880 18.07.2026 10:09:54.984 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 102
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 46559
Objects passed selection criteria: 46441
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 43604.2
Average stars matched: 41993.8 (96.3066 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 153768 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 17 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-157-gbf7d0e63
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-17)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jul 18 08:18:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461239.92308249
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits'
wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:19:44.068 -18:04:28.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03
Second-epoch image center 21:19:44.068 -18:04:28.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1028 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:19:45.052 -18:03:57.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03
Second-epoch image center 21:19:45.052 -18:03:57.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0937 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:19:44.068 -18:04:28.99
Second-epoch second image center 21:19:45.052 -18:03:57.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00945 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W7oH10yyTj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6NTOE44y70
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cSmHqeT5El
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4VJSG4Eyrd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7063 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6834 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4994 out of 5122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5122 out of 7063 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.585450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.585450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7063 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6834 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4994 out of 5122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5122 out of 7063 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7087 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2603 to -12.6412 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2603 to -12.6412 deg
Loaded 6814 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5032 out of 5155 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5155 out of 7087 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
2.3 pix Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
14.7 mag. Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.W7oH10yyTj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=463, bad_region=0, passed=7063
Got 7063 stars (including 6589 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7063 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6993 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.411 n_q1=253 n_q2=249 n_q3=224 n_q4=210 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6NTOE44y70 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=456, bad_region=0, passed=7087
Got 7087 stars (including 6625 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7087 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7018 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7020 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7020 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.420 n_q1=247 n_q2=246 n_q3=232 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cSmHqeT5El (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=318, bad_region=0, passed=5594
Got 5594 stars (including 5268 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5594 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5496 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5496 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=200 n_q2=253 n_q3=221 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.051
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4VJSG4Eyrd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=331, bad_region=0, passed=5748
Got 5748 stars (including 5405 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5665 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.345 n_q1=205 n_q2=252 n_q3=222 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.032
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits sigma_overall=0.435 worst_q_ratio=1.193
ref2=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits sigma_overall=0.410 worst_q_ratio=1.125
new1=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits sigma_overall=0.342 worst_q_ratio=1.051
new2=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits sigma_overall=0.336 worst_q_ratio=1.032
reference average sigma_overall=0.4225 worst_q_ratio=1.159
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_astrometric_residuals.png (936 matched stars from wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353_astrometric_residuals.png (931 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_051031_TTUQ1b1x1_1511216_62cT5OZa/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:58:50.49 -17:07:15.3: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:58:50.49 -17:07:15.3: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:50.49 -17:07:15.3: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7621 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20423_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 20423_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20495_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 20495_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53621_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 53621_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53627_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 53627_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53628_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 53628_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53629_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 53629_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53631_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 53631_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53632_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 53632_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53633_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 53633_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53634_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 53634_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53636_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 53636_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53638_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 53638_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53640_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 53640_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53641_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 53641_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53644_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 53644_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53646_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 53646_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53647_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 53647_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53650_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 53650_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53651_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 53651_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53652_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 53652_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53724_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 53724_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53834_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 53834_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53858_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
Preparing report for the candidate 53858_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53934_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 53934_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:50:06.06 -16:50:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54027_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54027_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54053_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54053_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54146_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54146_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54280_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
Preparing report for the candidate 54280_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54296_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54296_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54325_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54325_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54326_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54326_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54439_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54439_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54524_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54524_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54542_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54542_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54544_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54544_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54549_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54549_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54561_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54561_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54575_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54575_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54594_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54594_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54595_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54595_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54615_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54615_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54658_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54658_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54674_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54674_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54701_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54701_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54735_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54735_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54741_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54741_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54754_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54754_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54755_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54755_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54776_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54776_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54777_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
Preparing report for the candidate 54777_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54792_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54792_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54796_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54796_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54808_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54808_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54821_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54821_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54850_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54850_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54879_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54879_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54882_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54882_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54906_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54906_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:06:22.58 -18:49:38.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.260 6833568155080591488 316.59378440412 -18.82778249418 14.9505 14.5531 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.260#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54908_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54908_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54913_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54913_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54927_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54927_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54930_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54930_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54932_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54932_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54938_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54938_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54957_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54957_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:17:07.54 -13:15:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54976_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54976_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54982_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54982_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54992_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 54992_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55005_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 55005_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55012_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 55012_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55026_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 55026_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55031_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 55031_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55033_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 55033_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55049_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
Preparing report for the candidate 55049_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55063_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 55063_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55065_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 55065_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55071_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
Preparing report for the candidate 55071_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55074_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 55074_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55079_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 55079_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55084_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 55084_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55092_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 55092_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55094_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 55094_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55103_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 55103_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55108_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 55108_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55135_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 55135_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55136_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 55136_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55139_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 55139_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55159_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 55159_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55177_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 55177_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55187_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 55187_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55190_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 55190_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46524_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 46524_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_05-09-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
