This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.2191 2461239.7191 12.09 16:10:37.39 -09:31:46.1
2.77517 29.41129 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.28 Bellona -0 0 0 12.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:10:37.39 -09:31:46.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:10:37.39 -09:31:46.1: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.7191,12.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.2191 12.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.2191 2461239.7191 12.92 16:27:10.93 -14:26:39.3
1.31299 23.18022 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.119 Althaea 1 1 1 12.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:27:10.93 -14:26:39.3: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:27:10.93 -14:26:39.3: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.7191,12.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.2191 12.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.2191 2461239.7191 13.27 15:55:52.39 -05:26:39.5
3.84166 34.81820 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.97 Klotho 0 1 1 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:55:52.39 -05:26:39.5: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:55:52.39 -05:26:39.5: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.7191,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.2191 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.2191 2461239.7191 13.57 16:33:19.63 -14:34:05.3
2.20200 21.93389 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.412 Elisabetha 1 0 1 13.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:33:19.63 -14:34:05.3: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:33:19.63 -14:34:05.3: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.7191,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.2191 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.7191,14.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.2191 14.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.2191 2461239.7191 14.20 15:53:43.57 -07:49:58.4
1.19876 33.71387 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.323 Brucia -1 2 2 14.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:53:43.57 -07:49:58.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:53:43.57 -07:49:58.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.7191,14.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.2191 14.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.2191 2461239.7191 12.47 16:18:42.89 -13:06:15.7
1.04452 25.62199 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 2 1 2 12.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:42.89 -13:06:15.7: 15.62 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:42.89 -13:06:15.7: 15.92 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.72 +/- 0.22
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.7191,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.2191 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
First image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Last image: 2461239.71933668 18.07.2026 05:15:40.689 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 16
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8069
Objects passed selection criteria: 8068
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7759.25
Average stars matched: 7601.75 (97.9702 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 117316 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 17 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-157-gbf7d0e63
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-17)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jul 18 00:18:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
First image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Last image: 2461239.71933668 18.07.2026 05:15:40.689 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 137
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 33 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 61575
Objects passed selection criteria: 61452
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 57208.8
Average stars matched: 55522.5 (97.0525 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 164940 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 17 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-157-gbf7d0e63
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-17)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jul 18 00:21:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461239.71880841
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:12.898 -09:57:29.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:12.898 -09:57:29.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0377 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:14.567 -09:57:15.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:14.567 -09:57:15.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0448 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:12.898 -09:57:29.13
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:14.567 -09:57:15.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00789 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0xrppRSkzM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5003tLccp4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Dq9ti3dFhx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits &> /tmp/tmp.a0r0IRZib7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5208 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4041 out of 4212 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4212 out of 8279 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.855300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.855300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5208 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4041 out of 4212 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4212 out of 8279 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4983 deg, Dec -15.5992 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4983 deg, Dec -15.5992 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5222 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4038 out of 4215 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4215 out of 8296 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.2 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
3.0 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
2.9 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0xrppRSkzM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=513, bad_region=0, passed=8279
Got 8279 stars (including 7758 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=229 n_q2=245 n_q3=218 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5003tLccp4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=538, bad_region=0, passed=8296
Got 8296 stars (including 7747 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8133 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8133 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=234 n_q2=244 n_q3=214 n_q4=277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.267
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Dq9ti3dFhx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=315, bad_region=0, passed=7362
Got 7362 stars (including 7041 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7362 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=222 n_q2=255 n_q3=223 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.062
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.a0r0IRZib7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=310, bad_region=0, passed=7343
Got 7343 stars (including 7024 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7343 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=226 n_q2=255 n_q3=219 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits sigma_overall=0.340 worst_q_ratio=1.118
ref2=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits sigma_overall=0.350 worst_q_ratio=1.267
new1=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits sigma_overall=0.360 worst_q_ratio=1.062
new2=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits sigma_overall=0.365 worst_q_ratio=1.096
reference average sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.1925
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:35.45 -10:18:49.5: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:59.44 -08:07:31.0: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:19:28.48 -08:12:14.4: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:14:43.71 -10:42:52.5: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:55.00 -09:51:38.7: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:33.92 -09:43:47.9: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:10:37.39 -09:31:46.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:59.44 -08:07:31.0: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:59.44 -08:07:31.0: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8619 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:20.69 -08:21:39.9: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:19:28.48 -08:12:14.4: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:14:43.71 -10:42:52.5: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:28.48 -08:12:14.4: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1998 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:10:37.39 -09:31:46.1: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:19:25.49 -08:29:52.8: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:43.71 -10:42:52.5: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0380 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:26.61 -06:23:56.8: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:35.45 -10:18:49.5: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:35.45 -10:18:49.5: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1525 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:33.92 -09:43:47.9: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:55.00 -09:51:38.7: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:55.00 -09:51:38.7: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0855 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:33.92 -09:43:47.9: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0605 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:20.69 -08:21:39.9: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:20.69 -08:21:39.9: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2417 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:19:25.49 -08:29:52.8: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:25.49 -08:29:52.8: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2343 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:26.61 -06:23:56.8: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:26.61 -06:23:56.8: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2306 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20528.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20515_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20515_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:41.85 -14:41:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20518_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20518_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.34 -06:11:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20519_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20519_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20523_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20523_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:54.29 -09:46:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20524_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20524_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20526_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20526_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20528_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
Preparing report for the candidate 20528_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20529_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20529_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20530_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20530_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20532_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20532_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20533_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20533_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20534_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20534_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20535_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20535_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02024_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 02024_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:23.16 -07:56:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02078_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 02078_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:21:24.44 -07:42:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:10:37.39 -09:31:46.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:12.898 -09:57:29.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:12.898 -09:57:29.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0377 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:14.567 -09:57:15.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:14.567 -09:57:15.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0448 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:12.898 -09:57:29.13
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:14.567 -09:57:15.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00789 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TkDx38CJWv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sgM2zsoIfP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eKR4m0Pnbl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z9V3Yl3Dw5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 66506 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Loaded 5302 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3766 out of 4287 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4287 out of 66506 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.698250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.698250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 66506 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Loaded 5302 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3766 out of 4287 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4287 out of 66506 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 66556 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8754 to 252.4982 deg, Dec -15.6070 to -4.1798 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8754 to 252.4982 deg, Dec -15.6070 to -4.1798 deg
Loaded 5296 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3783 out of 4283 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4283 out of 66556 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 125 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
15.3 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.TkDx38CJWv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=3301, bad_region=1, passed=66487
Got 66487 stars (including 63074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=231 n_q2=251 n_q3=220 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sgM2zsoIfP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=3301, bad_region=1, passed=66529
Got 66529 stars (including 63096 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66529 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=233 n_q2=248 n_q3=220 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eKR4m0Pnbl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1851, bad_region=22, passed=48685
Got 48685 stars (including 46740 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48685 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48029 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48030 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48028 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.361 n_q1=225 n_q2=258 n_q3=221 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.z9V3Yl3Dw5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1811, bad_region=23, passed=48705
Got 48705 stars (including 46801 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48705 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=222 n_q2=257 n_q3=225 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.042
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-14-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_001616_TTUQ1b1x1_3347288_loVepOX9/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:14:40.64 -13:34:26.8: 14.23 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:45:54.57 -09:42:13.4: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:38:49.92 -14:01:02.0: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:02.65 -07:24:30.9: 14.70 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:14:29.22 -10:48:39.8: 14.44 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:53.50 -08:03:04.4: 14.63 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:30:28.93 -10:33:32.8: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:41:45.81 -14:19:06.1: 13.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:53.50 -08:03:04.4: 14.62 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:14:29.22 -10:48:39.8: 14.48 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:14:40.64 -13:34:26.8: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:45:54.57 -09:42:13.4: 13.61 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:02.65 -07:24:30.9: 14.83 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:38:49.92 -14:01:02.0: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:30:28.93 -10:33:32.8: 14.78 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:53.50 -08:03:04.4: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7793 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:29.22 -10:48:39.8: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5301 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:54.57 -09:42:13.4: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9895 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:40.64 -13:34:26.8: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2682 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:02.65 -07:24:30.9: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6248 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:49.92 -14:01:02.0: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7411 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:28.93 -10:33:32.8: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4441 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:41:45.81 -14:19:06.1: 13.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:45.81 -14:19:06.1: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5807 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:34.14 -12:26:10.6: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:27:10.93 -14:26:39.3: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:55:52.39 -05:26:39.5: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:36:50.86 -08:53:20.9: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:01.42 -14:45:37.4: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:19:59.18 -14:38:19.7: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:34.14 -12:26:10.6: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:34.14 -12:26:10.6: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8496 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:33:19.63 -14:34:05.3: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:27:10.93 -14:26:39.3: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:55:52.39 -05:26:39.5: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:45:31.60 -10:54:57.5: 13.63 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:36:50.86 -08:53:20.9: 13.45 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:50.86 -08:53:20.9: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2393 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:51.95 -07:08:16.0: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:01.42 -14:45:37.4: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:19:59.18 -14:38:19.7: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:01.42 -14:45:37.4: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4696 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:59.18 -14:38:19.7: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4042 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:33:19.63 -14:34:05.3: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:45:31.60 -10:54:57.5: 13.62 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:31.60 -10:54:57.5: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6460 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:51.95 -07:08:16.0: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:51.95 -07:08:16.0: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5501 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:06:46.15 -13:55:51.0: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:05.52 -12:08:21.5: 13.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:06:46.15 -13:55:51.0: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:46.15 -13:55:51.0: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7832 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:52:54.85 -13:16:29.5: 13.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:05.52 -12:08:21.5: 13.87 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:05.52 -12:08:21.5: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8227 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:59:52.71 -07:02:50.9: 13.83 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:39.09 -08:42:26.2: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:52:54.85 -13:16:29.5: 13.64 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:54.85 -13:16:29.5: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8307 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:59:52.71 -07:02:50.9: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:52.71 -07:02:50.9: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8034 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:39.09 -08:42:26.2: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:39.09 -08:42:26.2: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9003 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:57:38.42 -12:27:33.6: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:17.58 -10:21:33.3: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:57:38.42 -12:27:33.6: 13.94 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:38.75 -13:03:37.3: 13.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:38.42 -12:27:33.6: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9409 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:17.58 -10:21:33.3: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:17.58 -10:21:33.3: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9832 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:48.61 -09:50:38.5: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:02.11 -12:48:38.0: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:38.75 -13:03:37.3: 13.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:38.75 -13:03:37.3: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5565 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:48.61 -09:50:38.5: 13.80 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:48.61 -09:50:38.5: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1253 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:02.11 -12:48:38.0: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:02.11 -12:48:38.0: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9960 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:34:00.59 -10:40:14.6: 14.28 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:34.98 -08:01:20.3: 14.02 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:34:00.59 -10:40:14.6: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:00.59 -10:40:14.6: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1532 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:34.98 -08:01:20.3: 14.04 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:34.98 -08:01:20.3: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9082 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:05:26.99 -10:10:02.7: 14.49 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:05:57.02 -14:42:58.1: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:05:26.99 -10:10:02.7: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:26.99 -10:10:02.7: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2289 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:53:43.57 -07:49:58.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:05:57.02 -14:42:58.1: 15.16 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:57.02 -14:42:58.1: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4037 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:53:43.57 -07:49:58.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:08:23.38 -13:09:33.0: 14.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:43:43.31 -11:44:45.7: 14.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:08:23.38 -13:09:33.0: 14.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:23.38 -13:09:33.0: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5228 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:43:43.31 -11:44:45.7: 14.89 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:43.31 -11:44:45.7: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4952 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:12.54 -12:40:03.7: 15.20 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:12.54 -12:40:03.7: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:12.54 -12:40:03.7: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6483 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:42.89 -13:06:15.7: 15.62 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:42.89 -13:06:15.7: 15.92 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.72 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:18:42.89 -13:06:15.7: ref_mag=15.72 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=12.4677 delta=3.26 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56741.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82579.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82588.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82615.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82750.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82485_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82485_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82487_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82487_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82490_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82490_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82492_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82492_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82496_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82496_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82506_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82506_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82510_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82510_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:26.41 -09:44:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82513_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82513_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82514_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82514_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:18.11 -06:32:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82518_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82518_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82519_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82519_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82523_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82523_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:50.75 -13:20:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82525_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82525_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:32:12.56 -15:05:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82526_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82526_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:53.79 -15:13:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82534_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82534_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82537_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82537_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82538_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82538_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82540_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82540_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82546_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82546_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82547_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82547_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:37.39 -09:31:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82548_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82548_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82555_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82555_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82563_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82563_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82568_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82568_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:58.21 -05:49:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82570_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82570_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82572_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82572_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82578_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82578_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82579_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
Preparing report for the candidate 82579_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82580_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82580_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:30.56 -12:31:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82581_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82581_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82587_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82587_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82588_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
Preparing report for the candidate 82588_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82589_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82589_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82598_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82598_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:33:16.71 -12:48:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82600_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82600_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82605_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82605_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82609_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82609_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82615_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
Preparing report for the candidate 82615_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82618_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82618_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82619_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82619_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82620_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82620_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82621_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82621_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82627_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82627_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82628_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82628_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:52.17 -10:03:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82629_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82629_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82632_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82632_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82636_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82636_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82637_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82637_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82639_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82639_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82640_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82640_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82642_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82642_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82645_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82645_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82646_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82646_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82648_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82648_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:51.09 -11:08:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82649_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82649_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82651_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82651_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82652_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82652_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82655_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82655_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82659_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82659_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82661_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82661_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:36.93 -11:28:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82664_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82664_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82665_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82665_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82671_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82671_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82672_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82672_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82674_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82674_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82675_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82675_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82676_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82676_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82679_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82679_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82680_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82680_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82682_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82682_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82683_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82683_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82687_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82687_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82688_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82688_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82691_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82691_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82693_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82693_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82694_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82694_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82695_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82695_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82696_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82696_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82697_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82697_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:26.31 -06:56:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82698_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82698_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82699_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82699_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82701_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82701_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82704_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82704_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82709_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82709_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:48.74 -06:41:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82711_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82711_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82713_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82713_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82718_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
Preparing report for the candidate 82718_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82720_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82720_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82721_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82721_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82724_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82724_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82730_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82730_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82731_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82731_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82733_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82733_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82737_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82737_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82738_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82738_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82744_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82744_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82745_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82745_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82750_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
Preparing report for the candidate 82750_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82752_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82752_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82758_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82758_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:13.87 -06:26:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82766_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82766_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82771_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82771_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82777_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82777_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82796_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82796_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82812_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82812_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82814_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82814_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82824_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82824_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82826_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82826_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82827_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82827_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82834_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82834_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82835_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82835_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82837_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82837_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:51.19 -05:03:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82845_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82845_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82850_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82850_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82855_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82855_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09726_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 09726_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:48.69 -06:46:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06268_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 06268_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.32 -06:11:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32325_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 32325_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:54.28 -09:46:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52307_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52307_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:13.66 -13:57:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48353_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 48353_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:41.84 -14:41:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05644_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 05644_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:51.20 -05:51:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53453_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 53453_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:13:19.78 -13:31:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17622_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 17622_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:23.16 -07:56:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56741_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
Preparing report for the candidate 56741_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17754_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 17754_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_00-15-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
