This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.2052 2461239.7052 10.97 15:57:12.31 -20:37:53.0
351.07216 24.41123 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.21 Lutetia 0 0 0 11.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:57:12.31 -20:37:53.0: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:57:12.31 -20:37:53.0: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.7052,10.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.2052 10.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.2052 2461239.7052 12.61 16:02:35.89 -21:20:07.4
351.48959 23.02047 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.24 Themis 0 0 1 12.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:02:35.89 -21:20:07.4: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:02:35.89 -21:20:07.4: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.7052,12.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.2052 12.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.2052 2461239.7052 12.80 16:27:11.07 -14:26:39.8
1.31325 23.17969 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.119 Althaea -0 -1 1 12.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:27:11.07 -14:26:39.8: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:27:11.07 -14:26:39.8: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.7052,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.2052 12.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.2052 2461239.7052 13.13 16:26:28.72 -23:01:36.3
354.16008 17.80913 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.121 Hermione 0 0 0 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:26:28.72 -23:01:36.3: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:26:28.72 -23:01:36.3: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.7052,13.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.2052 13.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.2052 2461239.7052 13.93 15:51:48.91 -16:19:20.6
353.49585 28.34678 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.364 Isara -1 1 1 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:51:48.91 -16:19:20.6: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:51:48.91 -16:19:20.6: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.7052,13.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.2052 13.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.2052 2461239.7052 14.03 15:29:16.72 -20:09:39.0
346.04639 29.20073 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.1" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.363 Padua 1 0 1 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:29:16.72 -20:09:39.0: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:29:16.72 -20:09:39.0: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.7052,14.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.2052 14.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.2052 2461239.7052 14.36 15:57:02.70 -14:54:08.2
355.65179 28.41308 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.512 Taurinensis -0 1 1 14.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:57:02.70 -14:54:08.2: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:57:02.70 -14:54:08.2: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.7052,14.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.2052 14.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461153.90329036 23.04.2026 09:40:34.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
First image: 2461153.90329036 23.04.2026 09:40:34.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Last image: 2461239.70561796 18.07.2026 04:55:55.392 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.83
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 36 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7677
Objects passed selection criteria: 7674
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7497.5
Average stars matched: 7394.25 (98.6229 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116948 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 17 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-157-gbf7d0e63
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-17)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jul 18 07:39:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461153.90329036 23.04.2026 09:40:34.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
First image: 2461153.90329036 23.04.2026 09:40:34.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Last image: 2461239.70561796 18.07.2026 04:55:55.392 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 109
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 67 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 60688
Objects passed selection criteria: 60577
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 58218.8
Average stars matched: 56631 (97.2728 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 167168 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 17 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-157-gbf7d0e63
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-17)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jul 18 07:44:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461239.70484804
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits'
wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Image size: 941.3'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:00.259 -18:00:10.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:03.710 -17:57:19.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:00:00.259 -18:00:10.09
Second-epoch image center 16:00:03.710 -17:57:19.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0492 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:01.406 -17:56:48.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:00:00.259 -18:00:10.09
Second-epoch image center 16:00:01.406 -17:56:48.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0561 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:00:03.710 -17:57:19.98
Second-epoch second image center 16:00:01.406 -17:56:48.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01257 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9skYlHgW5D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cniON2AYNc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mBPKX1JvFi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.H7GAkxwEK6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8924 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.1943 to 248.3718 deg, Dec -23.5483 to -12.1244 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.1943 to 248.3718 deg, Dec -23.5483 to -12.1244 deg
Loaded 6474 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4830 out of 4987 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4987 out of 8924 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.739600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.739600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.83
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.91
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.91
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8924 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.1943 to 248.3718 deg, Dec -23.5483 to -12.1244 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.1943 to 248.3718 deg, Dec -23.5483 to -12.1244 deg
Loaded 6474 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4830 out of 4987 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4987 out of 8924 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 7602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2486 to -12.6560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2486 to -12.6560 deg
Loaded 5891 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4657 out of 4797 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4797 out of 7602 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
2.3 pix Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.5 pix fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
2.5 pix fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
14.7 mag. Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9skYlHgW5D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=501, bad_region=0, passed=8924
Got 8924 stars (including 8411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8924 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=227 n_q2=245 n_q3=231 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cniON2AYNc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=468, bad_region=0, passed=7602
Got 7602 stars (including 7123 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7464 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=269 n_q2=242 n_q3=233 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.300
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mBPKX1JvFi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=385, bad_region=0, passed=6857
Got 6857 stars (including 6459 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6857 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=228 n_q2=247 n_q3=233 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.032
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.H7GAkxwEK6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=382, bad_region=0, passed=6773
Got 6773 stars (including 6383 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6773 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6651 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6653 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6653 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=230 n_q2=248 n_q3=229 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.126
ref2=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits sigma_overall=0.491 worst_q_ratio=1.300
new1=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits sigma_overall=0.388 worst_q_ratio=1.032
new2=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits sigma_overall=0.399 worst_q_ratio=1.096
reference average sigma_overall=0.3995 worst_q_ratio=1.213
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:57:12.31 -20:37:53.0: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:25:53.20 -17:30:16.5: 12.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:57:12.31 -20:37:53.0: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:25:53.20 -17:30:16.5: 12.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:53.20 -17:30:16.5: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9228 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20370.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20368_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 20368_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:31.96 -21:31:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20370_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
Preparing report for the candidate 20370_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20374_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 20374_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:58.88 -18:30:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20377_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 20377_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:44.95 -16:36:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20378_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 20378_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:26.10 -19:20:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20381_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 20381_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04477_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 04477_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:23.71 -18:18:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08866_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 08866_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:39.16 -22:56:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 16s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
15:57:12.31 -20:37:53.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Image size: 941.3'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:00.259 -18:00:10.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:03.710 -17:57:19.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:00:00.259 -18:00:10.09
Second-epoch image center 16:00:03.710 -17:57:19.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0492 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:01.406 -17:56:48.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:00:00.259 -18:00:10.09
Second-epoch image center 16:00:01.406 -17:56:48.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0561 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:00:03.710 -17:57:19.98
Second-epoch second image center 16:00:01.406 -17:56:48.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01257 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Wi1VCdG6YW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eEdiwQsCrc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits &> /tmp/tmp.H9HTXNPbKf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ihfzs0S3L1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 67289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.1629 to 248.4174 deg, Dec -23.6127 to -12.1035 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.1629 to 248.4174 deg, Dec -23.6127 to -12.1035 deg
Loaded 6543 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4698 out of 5212 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5212 out of 67289 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.610200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.610200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.08
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.08
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 67289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.1629 to 248.4174 deg, Dec -23.6127 to -12.1035 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.1629 to 248.4174 deg, Dec -23.6127 to -12.1035 deg
Loaded 6543 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4698 out of 5212 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5212 out of 67289 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 59419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4793 deg, Dec -23.2633 to -12.6204 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4793 deg, Dec -23.2633 to -12.6204 deg
Loaded 5923 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4701 out of 5206 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5206 out of 59419 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 98 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
2.1 pix Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.3 pix fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
2.3 pix fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
14.9 mag. Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Wi1VCdG6YW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=3233, bad_region=14, passed=67276
Got 67276 stars (including 63934 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67276 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66363 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66362 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=219 n_q2=253 n_q3=233 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.041
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eEdiwQsCrc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2882, bad_region=0, passed=59403
Got 59403 stars (including 56422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59403 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58531 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58530 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58530 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.629 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.539 n_q1=285 n_q2=236 n_q3=225 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.291
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.H9HTXNPbKf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2031, bad_region=15, passed=53657
Got 53657 stars (including 51519 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53657 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.358 n_q1=227 n_q2=249 n_q3=233 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ihfzs0S3L1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2026, bad_region=16, passed=53955
Got 53955 stars (including 51835 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53955 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.344 n_q1=225 n_q2=251 n_q3=232 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_235949_TTUQ1b1x1_2679735_kiiX7kCQ/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:05:49.88 -14:47:21.5: 14.41 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:30:09.47 -15:15:58.8: 14.03 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:18:42.10 -18:33:29.1: 14.15 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:20:04.47 -16:11:56.6: 13.77 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:06:17.83 -19:35:36.0: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:51:25.33 -16:29:05.9: 14.28 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:04:24.96 -15:36:20.3: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:30:09.47 -15:15:58.8: 14.11 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:54:16.23 -15:05:03.6: 14.44 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:05:49.88 -14:47:21.5: 14.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:49.88 -14:47:21.5: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4708 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:09.47 -15:15:58.8: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2908 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:20:04.47 -16:11:56.6: 13.57 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:51:25.33 -16:29:05.9: 14.14 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:06:17.83 -19:35:36.0: 14.00 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:45:20.07 -18:42:08.6: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:04.47 -16:11:56.6: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0957 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:25.33 -16:29:05.9: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4711 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:17.83 -19:35:36.0: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1673 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:14:40.59 -13:34:24.3: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:18:42.10 -18:33:29.1: 14.15 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:04:24.96 -15:36:20.3: 13.77 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:42.10 -18:33:29.1: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3177 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:24.96 -15:36:20.3: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9653 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:16.23 -15:05:03.6: 14.21 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:16.23 -15:05:03.6: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5211 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:14:40.59 -13:34:24.3: 13.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:40.59 -13:34:24.3: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0467 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:45:20.07 -18:42:08.6: 13.96 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:20.07 -18:42:08.6: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1637 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:03:47.59 -14:51:45.6: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:08:20.13 -22:42:38.8: 13.71 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:32:51.16 -13:20:38.5: 12.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:56:52.00 -15:00:15.0: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:32:51.16 -13:20:38.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:51.16 -13:20:38.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:03:47.59 -14:51:45.6: 13.58 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:47.59 -14:51:45.6: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0452 delta=-0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:08:20.13 -22:42:38.8: 13.75 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:38:42.06 -17:04:33.3: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:20.13 -22:42:38.8: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7614 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:34:51.43 -14:42:42.3: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:56:52.00 -15:00:15.0: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:52.00 -15:00:15.0: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0488 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:38:42.06 -17:04:33.3: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:34:51.43 -14:42:42.3: 12.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:38:42.06 -17:04:33.3: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1667 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:34:51.43 -14:42:42.3: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7214 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:27:11.07 -14:26:39.8: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:02:35.89 -21:20:07.4: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:26:28.72 -23:01:36.3: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:48:14.92 -16:35:21.7: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:52:54.84 -13:16:29.0: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:31:34.10 -17:42:50.8: 13.55 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:27:11.07 -14:26:39.8: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:02:35.89 -21:20:07.4: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:48:35.81 -19:12:14.2: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:26:28.72 -23:01:36.3: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:51:40.61 -15:24:41.5: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:48:14.92 -16:35:21.7: 13.43 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:52:54.84 -13:16:29.0: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:14.92 -16:35:21.7: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3777 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:54.84 -13:16:29.0: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3066 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:45:19.72 -19:06:35.1: 13.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:41:38.99 -15:32:46.8: 13.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:31:34.10 -17:42:50.8: 13.54 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:34.10 -17:42:50.8: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4174 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:48:35.81 -19:12:14.2: 13.42 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:35.81 -19:12:14.2: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4518 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:51:40.61 -15:24:41.5: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:40.61 -15:24:41.5: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6140 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:45:19.72 -19:06:35.1: 13.57 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:19.72 -19:06:35.1: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7369 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:41:38.99 -15:32:46.8: 13.53 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:38.99 -15:32:46.8: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7942 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:19:39.47 -18:01:42.3: 13.85 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:43:40.00 -12:42:42.2: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:30:01.47 -21:05:52.1: 14.27 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:19:39.47 -18:01:42.3: 13.77 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:39.47 -18:01:42.3: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8415 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:43:40.00 -12:42:42.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:40.00 -12:42:42.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:32:32.58 -15:26:25.3: 14.17 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:30:01.47 -21:05:52.1: 14.26 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:01.47 -21:05:52.1: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9903 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:29:06.87 -17:53:55.1: 14.37 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:29:16.72 -20:09:39.0: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:32:32.58 -15:26:25.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:32.58 -15:26:25.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:51:48.91 -16:19:20.6: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:29:06.87 -17:53:55.1: 14.48 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:06.87 -17:53:55.1: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0578 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:29:16.72 -20:09:39.0: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:51:48.91 -16:19:20.6: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:11:57.71 -19:55:30.5: 15.28 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:28:46.89 -17:55:01.9: 14.29 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:30:20.58 -17:41:05.2: 14.57 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:30:58.44 -21:21:59.3: 14.61 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:11:57.71 -19:55:30.5: 15.02 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:28:46.89 -17:55:01.9: 14.39 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:11:57.71 -19:55:30.5: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.1836 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:46.89 -17:55:01.9: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2271 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:30:20.58 -17:41:05.2: 14.68 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:21:32.67 -21:30:56.2: 14.23 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:20.58 -17:41:05.2: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1548 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:30:58.44 -21:21:59.3: 14.60 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:58.44 -21:21:59.3: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2245 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:21:32.67 -21:30:56.2: 14.23 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:32.67 -21:30:56.2: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2803 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:21:23.20 -15:29:00.0: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:57:02.70 -14:54:08.2: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:16:48.72 -14:48:21.6: 14.38 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:30:12.34 -21:43:13.1: 14.70 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:21:23.20 -15:29:00.0: 14.42 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:23.20 -15:29:00.0: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3187 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:12:49.37 -13:50:04.1: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:16:48.72 -14:48:21.6: 14.39 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:57:02.70 -14:54:08.2: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:30:12.34 -21:43:13.1: 14.47 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:48.72 -14:48:21.6: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2980 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:30:12.34 -21:43:13.1: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.1662 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:12:49.37 -13:50:04.1: 13.70 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:49.37 -13:50:04.1: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0108 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:00:03.76 -14:39:54.6: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:00:03.76 -14:39:54.6: 14.19 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:03.76 -14:39:54.6: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1412 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:28:36.77 -13:27:29.6: 14.46 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:29:48.53 -14:26:01.9: 14.56 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:28:36.77 -13:27:29.6: 14.23 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:36.77 -13:27:29.6: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1540 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:30:22.19 -15:54:19.7: 14.37 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:29:48.53 -14:26:01.9: 14.36 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:48.53 -14:26:01.9: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2827 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:30:22.19 -15:54:19.7: 14.79 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:22.19 -15:54:19.7: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4177 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:33:47.53 -13:51:15.1: 14.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:55:00.74 -20:03:09.9: 14.51 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:33:47.53 -13:51:15.1: 14.69 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:33:47.53 -13:51:15.1: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3852 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:54:09.25 -12:57:49.7: 14.16 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:55:00.74 -20:03:09.9: 14.26 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:00.74 -20:03:09.9: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2921 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:29:58.19 -13:30:08.7: 14.43 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:09.25 -12:57:49.7: 13.88 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:09.25 -12:57:49.7: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3972 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:06:22.05 -13:14:06.5: 15.23 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:29:58.19 -13:30:08.7: 14.72 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:58.19 -13:30:08.7: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2110 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:16:07.72 -22:42:54.9: 14.46 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:06:22.05 -13:14:06.5: 14.89 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:22.05 -13:14:06.5: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4441 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:29:05.34 -20:40:40.2: 14.57 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:16:07.72 -22:42:54.9: 14.74 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:07.72 -22:42:54.9: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3148 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:22:38.04 -22:09:10.8: 14.43 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:29:05.34 -20:40:40.2: 14.40 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:53:00.84 -13:00:24.5: 14.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:05.34 -20:40:40.2: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3031 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:22:38.04 -22:09:10.8: 14.45 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:38.04 -22:09:10.8: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3161 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:53:00.84 -13:00:24.5: 14.86 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:00.84 -13:00:24.5: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5278 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:31:19.15 -17:15:26.0: 14.56 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:19:40.65 -13:16:06.4: 15.18 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:19:40.65 -13:16:06.4: 14.94 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:40.65 -13:16:06.4: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.5624 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:46:14.51 -19:51:43.4: 14.54 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:58:09.48 -16:19:05.7: 14.71 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:31:19.15 -17:15:26.0: 14.35 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:31:19.15 -17:15:26.0: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4952 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:24:26.72 -16:24:52.6: 14.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:09:25.29 -12:58:15.4: 15.41 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:58:09.48 -16:19:05.7: 15.21 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:09.48 -16:19:05.7: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5897 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:46:14.51 -19:51:43.4: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:14.51 -19:51:43.4: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4543 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:28:51.84 -17:42:37.8: 14.53 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:24:26.72 -16:24:52.6: 14.62 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:26.72 -16:24:52.6: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4876 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:19:12.36 -14:15:16.0: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:09:25.29 -12:58:15.4: 14.86 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:25.29 -12:58:15.4: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.5425 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:28:51.84 -17:42:37.8: 14.44 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:51.84 -17:42:37.8: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5024 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:48:57.72 -16:12:01.7: 14.23 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:19:12.36 -14:15:16.0: 14.43 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:12.36 -14:15:16.0: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3981 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:48:57.72 -16:12:01.7: 14.54 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:57.72 -16:12:01.7: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3183 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:12:43.31 -19:31:44.3: 14.80 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:08:52.11 -16:00:30.2: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:09:22.53 -14:04:40.3: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:25:23.79 -16:36:15.2: 14.56 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:12:43.31 -19:31:44.3: 14.67 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:43.31 -19:31:44.3: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5246 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:07:23.61 -13:16:37.3: 14.46 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:08:52.11 -16:00:30.2: 14.86 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:52.11 -16:00:30.2: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6994 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:59:29.48 -13:17:35.8: 15.51 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:32:55.12 -12:54:16.3: 14.79 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:09:22.53 -14:04:40.3: 14.67 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:22.53 -14:04:40.3: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4325 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:11:47.28 -20:38:59.5: 14.85 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:25:23.79 -16:36:15.2: 14.65 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:23.79 -16:36:15.2: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6280 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:23.61 -13:16:37.3: 14.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:23.61 -13:16:37.3: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5235 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:59:29.48 -13:17:35.8: 15.18 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:05:02.38 -15:28:53.6: 15.17 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:29.48 -13:17:35.8: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.6425 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:32:55.12 -12:54:16.3: 14.69 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:32:55.12 -12:54:16.3: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5741 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:11:47.28 -20:38:59.5: 14.61 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:47.28 -20:38:59.5: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5077 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:05:02.38 -15:28:53.6: 15.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:02.38 -15:28:53.6: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7037 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:27:34.06 -13:31:04.7: 14.32 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:27:34.06 -13:31:04.7: 14.24 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:34.06 -13:31:04.7: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4982 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82348.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82231.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82233.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82259.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82345.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82347.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82396.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82133_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82133_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82136_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82136_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82140_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82140_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82148_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82148_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:36:45.32 -14:31:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82153_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82153_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82154_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82154_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82160_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82160_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82162_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82162_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:32:40.72 -14:53:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82164_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82164_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82166_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82166_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82167_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82167_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82173_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82173_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82174_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82174_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82178_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82178_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:42.03 -16:54:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82183_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82183_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82189_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82189_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:38:49.72 -14:34:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82192_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82192_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:21:13.58 -21:02:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82195_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82195_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82196_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82196_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82197_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82197_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82202_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82202_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82209_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82209_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:57:12.33 -20:37:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82214_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82214_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:58.92 -18:30:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82220_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82220_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:19:24.56 -22:21:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82229_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82229_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:56.19 -18:59:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82231_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
Preparing report for the candidate 82231_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82233_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
Preparing report for the candidate 82233_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82244_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82244_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:45.73 -20:08:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82259_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
Preparing report for the candidate 82259_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82263_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82263_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82270_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82270_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82272_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82272_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82273_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82273_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82279_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82279_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82302_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82302_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82304_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82304_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82308_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82308_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82319_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82319_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82323_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82323_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82333_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82333_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:31:16.05 -17:39:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82334_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82334_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:51.64 -13:10:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82337_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82337_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82341_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82341_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82345_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
Preparing report for the candidate 82345_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82347_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
Preparing report for the candidate 82347_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82348_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82348_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:57.71 -19:55:30.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.791 6245467289788975104 242.99049702326 -19.92619125181 14.8019 14.2308 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.791#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82361_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82361_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82369_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82369_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82373_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82373_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82382_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82382_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82384_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82384_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82396_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
Preparing report for the candidate 82396_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82401_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82401_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82405_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82405_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82407_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82407_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82408_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82408_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82410_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82410_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82414_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82414_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:14:21.02 -18:41:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82417_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82417_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82418_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82418_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82419_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82419_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82430_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82430_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82436_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82436_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82440_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82440_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82446_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82446_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82448_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82448_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82462_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82462_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82468_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82468_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82481_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82481_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82488_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82488_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82489_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82489_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82490_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82490_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82492_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82492_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82497_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82497_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82499_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82499_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82504_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82504_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82510_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82510_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82512_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82512_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82513_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82513_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:52.60 -14:24:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82523_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82523_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82527_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82527_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82534_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82534_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82538_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82538_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82543_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82543_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82544_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82544_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82549_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82549_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82550_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82550_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82560_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82560_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:33:33.33 -17:53:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82566_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82566_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02647_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 02647_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45028_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 45028_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:39.17 -22:56:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41514_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 41514_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:26.05 -19:20:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61945_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 61945_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:04.55 -20:06:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37373_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 37373_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:23.71 -18:18:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44712_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 44712_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:58:15.57 -22:44:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28887_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 28887_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:06.94 -17:23:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23970_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 23970_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:44.97 -16:36:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26986_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 26986_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-55-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
