NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Leo-06-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 17.16292    2461238.66292    12.30    11:33:30.16 +17:21:56.3   4892 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    12.26    11:33:30.14 +17:21:55.7   4895 1165   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 17.1632  2461238.6632  12.28  11:33:30.15 +17:21:56.0
237.36798  69.53350 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.2 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
511 Davida                  -1      1       1  12.5    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:33:30.15 +17:21:56.0:  16.17 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:33:30.15 +17:21:56.0:  16.19 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-06-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 17.16292    2461238.66292    12.98    11:37:53.74 +11:12:58.3   4012 4824   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    12.98    11:37:53.79 +11:12:58.4   4015 4821   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 17.1632  2461238.6632  12.98  11:37:53.76 +11:12:58.4
252.02083  66.50902 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 4.3 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
416 Vaticana                -1      0       1  13.0     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:37:53.76 +11:12:58.4:  16.08 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:37:53.76 +11:12:58.4:  16.03 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-06-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 17.16292    2461238.66292    13.29    11:04:48.90 +09:17:34.5   8873 6244   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.53    11:04:48.89 +09:17:33.4   8876 6241   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 17.1632  2461238.6632  13.41  11:04:48.89 +09:17:33.9
243.20693  59.15879 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.2 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
103 Hera                    -1     -1       2  13.6    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:04:48.89 +09:17:33.9:  15.83 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:04:48.89 +09:17:33.9:  15.82 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-06-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 3

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Leo-06-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-06-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 447237 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 447237 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits_preview.png'
Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits

renamed 'Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits_preview.png'
Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 532.6367 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.1419 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1394.5395 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 431.4162 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1394.6744 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 429.6388 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.61818 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.004 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-16T22:54:26.6599146' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-17T03:54:26.6599146' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61238.1628085533 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-17T03:54:36.5647927' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61238.1629231945 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 173.330685055192 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.9996714707438 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 17.4647222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 275.260833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.29883009587519 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 33 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29504 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29504 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 71.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.01 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 357.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/d_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits :) Spent 0.969646 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/d_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-16T22:55:12.3406763' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-17T03:55:12.3406763' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61238.1633372684 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-17T03:55:22.2431796' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61238.1634518867 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 173.330685079552 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.9996714644033 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 17.3055555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 275.363055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.32756174755737 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 33 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29504 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29504 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 71.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.01 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 357.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/d_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits :) Spent 0.996883 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/d_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits


fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461238.66292429 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits Image size: 942.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:33:20.294 +13:59:48.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 Second-epoch image center 11:33:20.294 +13:59:48.77 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0050 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Image size: 942.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:33:21.376 +13:59:28.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 Second-epoch image center 11:33:21.376 +13:59:28.28 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0108 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:33:20.294 +13:59:48.77 Second-epoch second image center 11:33:21.376 +13:59:28.28 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00718 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GjendZIH6h Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oCrjR53cQG Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UhQ3fKfaPC Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NenwzwTBa7 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec +8.4844 to +19.3112 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec 8.4844 to 19.3112 deg Loaded 3827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2957 out of 3146 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3146 out of 5845 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.922700 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.922700 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec +8.4844 to +19.3112 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec 8.4844 to 19.3112 deg Loaded 3827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2957 out of 3146 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3146 out of 5845 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.4) Read 5851 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9329 to 181.4972 deg, Dec +8.5231 to +19.3318 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9329 to 181.4972 deg, Dec 8.5231 to 19.3318 deg Loaded 3815 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2962 out of 3141 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3141 out of 5851 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 2.2 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 2.4 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits 2.4 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 15.3 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.GjendZIH6h (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=451, bad_region=0, passed=5845 Got 5845 stars (including 5387 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5754 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5755 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5755 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=249 n_q2=272 n_q3=235 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.oCrjR53cQG (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=436, bad_region=0, passed=5851 Got 5851 stars (including 5411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5851 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5764 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5763 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5763 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=257 n_q2=269 n_q3=229 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.UhQ3fKfaPC (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=9, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=180, bad_region=0, passed=3330 Got 3330 stars (including 3143 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3330 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3282 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3282 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3282 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.453 n_q1=229 n_q2=203 n_q3=298 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.167 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.NenwzwTBa7 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=171, bad_region=0, passed=3289 Got 3289 stars (including 3114 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3289 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3236 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3236 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3236 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.508 n_q1=229 n_q2=208 n_q3=299 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.420 worst_q_ratio=1.107 ref2=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits sigma_overall=0.420 worst_q_ratio=1.131 new1=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits sigma_overall=0.388 worst_q_ratio=1.167 new2=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits sigma_overall=0.412 worst_q_ratio=1.233 reference average sigma_overall=0.42 worst_q_ratio=1.119 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits Image size: 942.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:33:20.294 +13:59:48.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 Second-epoch image center 11:33:20.294 +13:59:48.77 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0050 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Image size: 942.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:33:21.376 +13:59:28.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 Second-epoch image center 11:33:21.376 +13:59:28.28 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0108 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:33:20.294 +13:59:48.77 Second-epoch second image center 11:33:21.376 +13:59:28.28 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00718 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5tudUfVrlg Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.srwOgTr5Mb Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Bi5WeFzVtR Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yZiDlg9G6a Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 30089 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec +8.4661 to +19.3314 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec 8.4661 to 19.3314 deg Loaded 3838 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2863 out of 3171 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3171 out of 30089 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.808900 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.808900 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 30089 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec +8.4661 to +19.3314 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec 8.4661 to 19.3314 deg Loaded 3838 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2863 out of 3171 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3171 out of 30089 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=5.0) Read 30117 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9329 to 181.5106 deg, Dec +8.4752 to +19.3348 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9329 to 181.5106 deg, Dec 8.4752 to 19.3348 deg Loaded 3840 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2876 out of 3175 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3175 out of 30117 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 101 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 2.1 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 2.4 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits 2.3 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 15.5 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 14.5 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits 14.5 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.5tudUfVrlg (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1260, bad_region=10, passed=30074 Got 30074 stars (including 28749 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30074 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=244 n_q2=273 n_q3=235 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.srwOgTr5Mb (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1200, bad_region=13, passed=30099 Got 30099 stars (including 28834 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30099 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29751 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29752 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29752 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=252 n_q2=273 n_q3=231 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Bi5WeFzVtR (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=416, bad_region=23, passed=18357 Got 18357 stars (including 17888 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18357 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18139 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18137 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18137 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.473 n_q1=229 n_q2=208 n_q3=299 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.yZiDlg9G6a (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=448, bad_region=23, passed=18419 Got 18419 stars (including 17914 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18419 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18171 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18167 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18167 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.505 n_q1=229 n_q2=208 n_q3=302 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:51:17.64 +11:59:15.8: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:40:11.89 +17:18:42.6: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:33:30.15 +17:21:56.0: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:40:11.89 +17:18:42.6: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:40:11.89 +17:18:42.6: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1775 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:33:30.15 +17:21:56.0: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:51:17.64 +11:59:15.8: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:51:17.64 +11:59:15.8: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6334 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:37:53.76 +11:12:58.4: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:37:53.76 +11:12:58.4: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:04:48.89 +09:17:33.9: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:04:48.89 +09:17:33.9: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:50:04.38 +11:01:24.6: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:50:04.38 +11:01:24.6: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:50:04.38 +11:01:24.6: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8085 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52282.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52422.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52632.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52092_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52092_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 17.16292    2461238.66292    14.32    11:40:11.91 +17:18:43.0   3930 1137   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    14.08    11:40:11.87 +17:18:42.1   3933 1134   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52095_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52095_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.89    12:04:35.17 +12:35:55.4   0130 3683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits **** FOUND 12:04:35.26 +12:35:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52096_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52096_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.66    11:58:47.24 +12:23:17.7   0984 3886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits **** FOUND 11:58:47.20 +12:23:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52098_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52098_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 17.16292    2461238.66292    12.63    11:51:17.66 +11:59:15.3   2071 4220   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    12.64    11:51:17.62 +11:59:16.4   2074 4217   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52172_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52172_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    11.29    11:37:35.11 +16:11:02.2   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52175_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52175_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    11.34    11:44:18.53 +11:30:48.6   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52187_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52187_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    11.64    11:58:46.42 +16:16:40.9   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52233_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52233_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    11.76    11:10:36.59 +17:05:50.6   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52277_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52277_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    12.11    11:15:23.12 +14:00:55.2   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52282_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 Preparing report for the candidate 52282_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52295_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52295_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    12.67    12:04:31.49 +18:28:03.6   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52338_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52338_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    12.95    11:56:19.09 +15:43:39.4   1526 1902   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits **** FOUND 11:56:19.11 +15:43:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52354_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52354_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    12.82    11:41:35.46 +17:15:11.6   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52362_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52362_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    12.97    11:59:54.54 +14:38:45.8   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52378_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52378_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    12.87    11:39:16.03 +10:55:29.3   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52407_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52407_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    12.55    11:07:50.75 +16:42:09.0   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52421_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52421_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    12.84    11:08:39.19 +17:13:18.5   8476 1408   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits **** FOUND 11:08:39.18 +17:13:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52422_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 Preparing report for the candidate 52422_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52426_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52426_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.17    12:01:13.06 +17:06:38.6   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52429_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52429_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.25    11:54:05.83 +18:11:14.9   1974 0442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits **** FOUND 11:54:05.81 +18:11:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52439_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52439_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.24    11:56:28.21 +12:20:25.1   1325 3943   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits **** FOUND 11:56:28.19 +12:20:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52445_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52445_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.35    11:59:13.75 +09:48:43.1   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52448_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52448_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.12    11:52:39.74 +15:26:05.5   2045 2125   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits **** FOUND 11:52:39.72 +15:26:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52450_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52450_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.16    11:38:01.98 +12:59:06.1   4067 3756   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits **** FOUND 11:38:01.97 +12:59:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52456_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52456_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    12.88    11:15:56.25 +12:49:01.7   7298 4033   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits **** FOUND 11:15:56.26 +12:49:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52467_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52467_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.26    12:02:40.97 +11:19:43.1   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52469_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52469_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.49    11:55:29.04 +17:11:39.4   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52479_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52479_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.37    12:03:06.12 +10:51:02.7   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52488_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52488_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    12.93    11:03:35.05 +12:18:26.4   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52498_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52498_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.46    12:05:37.19 +16:14:55.9   0189 1455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52509_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52509_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    12.93    11:03:41.63 +13:48:54.8   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52512_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52512_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.31    11:59:22.78 +15:27:20.5   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52517_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52517_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.33    12:00:42.98 +18:25:43.1   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52534_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52534_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.65    12:04:24.67 +13:14:08.1   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52556_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52556_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.19    11:29:14.59 +10:06:14.9   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52561_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52561_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.54    11:45:31.22 +17:52:28.8   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52565_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52565_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.41    12:00:50.46 +13:21:40.6   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52569_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52569_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.59    12:04:31.95 +15:06:47.1   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52575_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52575_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.75    12:01:04.44 +16:36:04.8   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52576_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52576_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.60    11:58:57.36 +15:04:52.1   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52578_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52578_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.15    11:04:27.63 +09:31:29.0   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52582_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52582_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.76    11:39:41.24 +15:29:16.3   3930 2237   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52591_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52591_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.54    11:48:36.86 +14:18:33.4   2581 2850   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits **** FOUND 11:48:36.88 +14:18:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52597_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52597_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.36    12:03:56.39 +11:39:15.9   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52599_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52599_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.52    11:56:38.06 +14:12:30.9   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52600_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52600_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.15    11:03:46.52 +15:45:55.5   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52602_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52602_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.29    11:15:39.34 +16:56:25.2   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52628_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52628_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.56    12:03:05.13 +12:30:32.8   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52632_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 Preparing report for the candidate 52632_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52637_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52637_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.43    11:34:38.73 +19:05:25.2   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52641_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52641_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    14.12    12:05:00.63 +16:28:35.2   0292 1326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52650_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52650_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.58    11:35:29.69 +19:00:48.2   4674 0150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52653_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52653_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.65    11:54:36.34 +18:25:55.6   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52664_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52664_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.59    11:43:39.36 +10:42:04.4   3143 5074   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits **** FOUND 11:43:39.41 +10:42:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52669_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52669_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.39    11:18:56.47 +10:11:23.2   6780 5599   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits **** FOUND 11:18:56.45 +10:11:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52681_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52681_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.56    11:12:06.90 +14:17:25.0   7898 3167   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits **** FOUND 11:12:06.86 +14:17:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52694_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52694_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.61    11:28:26.98 +16:38:48.8   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52699_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52699_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.43    11:02:49.55 +09:43:18.4   9185 5990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52704_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52704_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.83    11:31:23.69 +16:05:31.1   5151 1950   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits **** FOUND 11:31:23.73 +16:05:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52706_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52706_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 17.16292    2461238.66292    13.88    11:50:04.40 +11:01:24.9   2204 4815   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-54-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.75    11:50:04.36 +11:01:24.3   2207 4812   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52707_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52707_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.64    11:03:53.32 +14:04:10.0   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52726_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52726_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.74    11:43:16.01 +09:46:54.7   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52759_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52759_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    14.18    11:42:44.44 +18:45:20.7   3630 0234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52765_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52765_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    14.04    11:44:59.32 +17:08:48.7   3237 1183   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits **** FOUND 11:44:59.36 +17:08:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52766_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52766_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.92    11:59:11.29 +17:00:54.7   1175 1084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52767_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52767_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.45    11:15:47.76 +16:33:13.6   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52768_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52768_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    14.06    11:53:11.10 +18:23:01.7   2115 0335   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits **** FOUND 11:53:11.04 +18:23:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52770_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52770_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.68    11:10:00.78 +12:28:08.5   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52771_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52771_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    14.30    11:59:27.15 +11:12:38.6   0819 4590   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52790_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52790_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    14.05    11:28:24.81 +15:57:10.7   5576 2058   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52794_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52794_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.86    11:09:54.38 +17:34:11.6   8302 1192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52797_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52797_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.96    11:51:52.19 +09:39:53.0   1871 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52808_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52808_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.65    11:28:26.24 +18:54:23.6   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52810_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52810_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.98    11:42:48.73 +13:02:32.6   3371 3674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52815_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52815_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    14.61    11:58:39.64 +18:02:01.8   1306 0473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52831_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52831_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.79    11:13:18.22 +12:13:43.9   7671 4405   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits **** FOUND 11:13:18.27 +12:13:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52837_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52837_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    14.03    11:27:30.52 +16:32:45.5   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52839_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52839_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.84    11:11:27.69 +16:41:49.4   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52840_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52840_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    14.02    11:05:13.98 +13:13:47.3   8892 3843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52844_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52844_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    14.48    11:48:44.81 +16:19:01.9   2656 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52848_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52848_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.95    11:11:49.27 +13:48:39.4   7930 3458   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52852_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52852_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.93    11:38:59.50 +11:50:39.5   3880 4432   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52854_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52854_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    14.32    11:29:32.28 +18:56:07.2   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52857_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52857_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    14.18    11:56:27.49 +10:11:56.4   1212 5239   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52858_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52858_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.96    11:53:52.54 +09:26:38.5   1559 5727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52863_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52863_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    14.05    12:02:12.21 +09:26:13.8   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52870_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52870_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.88    11:10:03.45 +13:00:03.9   8171 3957   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52872_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52872_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.96    11:19:43.98 +15:01:03.8   6804 2683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52876_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52876_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    14.33    11:36:25.07 +12:42:01.5   4292 3942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52878_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52878_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.93    11:45:12.59 +08:56:30.1   2831 6124   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52888_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52888_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    14.08    11:39:47.51 +14:49:12.5   3887 2637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52894_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52894_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    14.35    12:05:33.26 +15:21:38.6   0147 1995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52895_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52895_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    14.63    11:42:57.06 +17:55:47.2   3564 0732   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52900_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52900_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.94    11:08:41.26 +17:43:26.1   8483 1103   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52905_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52905_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    14.22    11:43:47.11 +15:36:14.5   3342 2125   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52914_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52914_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    14.36    11:37:07.06 +17:40:18.9   4389 0947   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52928_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 52928_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    14.36    11:44:48.81 +15:45:30.7   3200 2021   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 17507_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 17507_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    12.19    11:09:18.16 +14:37:02.0   8320 2984   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits **** FOUND 11:09:18.12 +14:37:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 26067_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 26067_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    9.15    11:23:40.06 +16:51:05.7   6291 1552   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits **** FOUND 11:23:40.06 +16:51:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 26362_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 26362_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    12.33    11:32:55.59 +16:48:40.2   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01762_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 The candidate 01762_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 17.16345    2461238.66345    13.76    11:42:11.23 +09:23:24.5   3302 5882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_230038_TTUQ1b1x1_3915245_tx3NKOfA/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_22-55-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 2s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 23s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 11:33:30.15 +17:21:56.0 11:37:53.76 +11:12:58.4 11:04:48.89 +09:17:33.9 ########### Completed Leo-06-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 11:33:30.15 +17:21:56.0 11:37:53.76 +11:12:58.4 11:04:48.89 +09:17:33.9 ################################################################################### 11:33:30.15 +17:21:56.0 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 11:37:53.76 +11:12:58.4 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 11:04:48.89 +09:17:33.9 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461238.66292429 -observatory V36 07:14:46.29 +17:23:06.0 Mercury (4.5mag) 10:39:38.43 +09:36:30.2 Venus (-4.2mag) 04:44:21.81 +22:11:40.9 Mars (1.3mag) 08:22:52.70 +19:51:31.8 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:27.30 +03:22:13.2 Saturn (0.7mag) 04:08:29.28 +20:48:25.5 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:56.89 +00:19:48.2 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:30:16.68 -23:21:00.2 Pluto (14.4mag) 10:11:47.60 +10:06:29.1 Moon (-9.0mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jul 17 00:09 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461238.66292429: 08:22:54.25 +19:51:27.8 Io (6.0mag) 08:22:50.25 +19:51:42.8 Europa (6.3mag) 08:23:07.57 +19:50:37.0 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:22:26.58 +19:53:10.4 Callisto (6.8mag) 08:21:06.19 +19:38:43.0 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:22:53.80 +19:51:28.1 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:20:27.05 +19:41:41.1 Elara (17.7mag) 08:26:36.76 +19:42:04.3 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:27:26.82 +19:57:38.2 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:39.33 +03:22:07.9 Titan (8.5mag) 00:56:32.36 +03:22:07.4 Rhea (9.8mag) 00:55:52.55 +03:20:12.3 Iapetus (11.2mag) 00:56:13.39 +03:22:16.2 Hyperion (14.5mag) 00:56:18.93 +03:18:27.5 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 17 00:09 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461238.66292429: 17:57:19.41 -31:23:14.0 JWST 19:34:55.18 +04:15:39.5 Chandra 08:44:51.63 -48:52:12.6 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 17 00:09 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461238.66292429 -observatory V36 02:45:48.64 +15:13:01.8 17.8mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:12:55.12 -34:31:25.6 13.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:32:28.32 -68:15:42.8 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:03:08.27 +32:33:54.4 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 02:23:05.23 +19:45:24.1 15.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:55:15.25 +32:14:25.0 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:20:06.07 +26:51:33.9 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:01:29.93 +29:28:27.8 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:14:09.74 +05:07:01.3 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:03:10.43 +21:00:19.8 18.0mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:11:05.18 -11:33:18.7 17.8mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:40:43.52 +67:30:57.5 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 16:18:06.91 -10:47:02.0 14.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:12:37.80 +66:05:07.6 17.9mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:41:37.74 +30:20:30.2 14.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:13:15.23 +15:28:54.1 17.6mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:32:28.10 +40:38:04.8 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:40:10.55 +46:59:02.5 17.8mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 04:56:00.31 -13:30:36.3 15.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:40:07.78 +27:55:55.0 18.0mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:18:56.90 -13:31:27.3 16.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:04:09.00 +22:07:51.9 17.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:47:04.93 +03:37:44.8 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:33:44.16 +79:08:55.3 17.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:53:06.13 +45:31:20.7 16.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:30:00.12 +05:41:34.9 17.0mag A/2026 E1 21:29:31.17 -17:39:43.2 7.1mag 10P/Tempel 11:16:44.97 -02:11:31.0 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:09:54.03 +30:16:56.2 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:22:16.71 +11:49:48.9 17.1mag 63P/Wild 00:51:01.84 -05:02:46.8 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 04:43:49.85 +20:29:14.1 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 02:33:01.29 +11:30:32.7 16.3mag 88P/Howell 06:55:35.61 +30:04:21.5 15.8mag 93P/Lovas 04:43:15.02 +31:19:10.7 16.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 08:25:19.85 +29:54:21.3 15.2mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:00:54.59 -01:34:25.7 16.9mag 124P/Mrkos 05:02:37.45 +20:59:13.8 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 05:49:01.68 +19:37:59.4 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 07:37:56.69 +15:30:40.4 16.4mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:19:26.47 -20:34:00.6 15.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 05:57:38.33 +35:18:12.8 15.4mag 162P/SidingSpring 18:43:38.70 +19:39:53.5 14.1mag 169P/NEAT 01:57:02.65 +08:18:25.0 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:35:30.72 -08:41:14.2 17.2mag 235P/LINEAR 08:59:32.99 +32:39:06.5 18.0mag 240P/NEAT 20:38:39.75 -50:56:57.0 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 02:18:28.59 +15:16:37.0 15.6mag 260P/McNaught 05:57:58.10 +37:19:26.4 17.4mag 295P/LINEAR 15:06:30.85 +05:25:52.4 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski 08:40:44.80 +19:23:38.2 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 08:02:24.77 +38:38:45.9 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.6K Jul 17 00:09 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-26eg 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 2026-07-14.15 15.5 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 17 00:09 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 17 00:09 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 22:27:50.004 -06:44:08.56 AT 2026svd 2026-06-26.40 23.3852 04:22:38.209 -47:20:55.00 AT 2026svc 2026-06-26.43 22.5609 21:50:00.261 -07:57:05.98 AT 2026svb 2026-06-26.41 23.0326 00:44:37.185 -43:22:31.83 AT 2026sva 2026-06-26.42 21.6706 21:35:19.036 -19:34:24.34 AT 2026suz 2026-06-26.41 23.3439 22:40:47.013 -09:25:04.67 AT 2026suy 2026-06-26.40 23.289 22:05:53.553 -08:24:29.60 AT 2026sux 2026-06-26.41 22.2593 22:33:25.333 -02:10:00.75 AT 2026suw 2026-06-26.40 22.6919 22:01:05.082 -07:26:52.26 AT 2026suv 2026-06-26.41 22.9876 22:30:12.816 -04:52:34.67 AT 2026suu 2026-06-26.40 21.9579 21:54:55.644 -07:45:32.24 AT 2026sut 2026-06-26.41 21.0171 18:17:40.907 -50:01:40.94 AT 2026sus 2026-07-07.95 19.363 20:17:07.701 -31:44:39.62 SN 2026sur 2026-07-08.18 19.091 03:21:24.733 -45:31:36.65 AT 2026suq 2026-07-08.14 18.759 21:15:50.298 -66:09:30.96 AT 2026sup 2026-07-07.05 18.911 22:32:27.822 -20:22:41.23 AT 2026suo 2026-07-06.46 19.8035 04:03:27.102 -57:43:47.16 AT 2026sun 2026-07-08.15 18.325 23:58:57.947 -03:02:20.39 AT 2026sum 2026-07-08.38 19.6555 00:36:59.677 +43:01:07.64 AT 2026sul 2026-07-05.38 20.0025 14:33:14.800 +42:54:37.00 AT 2026suk 2026-06-30.71 21.4 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Jul 17 00:09 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 90 C