This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.62 13:34:02.28 +66:15:31.1
116.24095 50.31256 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:34:02.28 +66:15:31.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.357+/-0.031 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:34:02.28 +66:15:31.1: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:34:02.28 +66:15:31.1: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.8566,12.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.3566 12.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.46 13:50:16.27 +65:23:37.3
113.33919 50.62466 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 2.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:50:16.27 +65:23:37.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.628+/-0.029 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:50:16.27 +65:23:37.3: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:50:16.27 +65:23:37.3: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.8566,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.3566 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.49 13:24:45.54 +67:02:01.9
117.91075 49.76828 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:24:45.54 +67:02:01.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.333+/-0.031 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:24:45.54 +67:02:01.9: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:24:45.54 +67:02:01.9: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.8566,12.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.3566 12.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.38 13:04:15.68 +59:56:12.4
119.97406 57.11777 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 3.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:04:15.68 +59:56:12.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.331+/-0.028 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:04:15.68 +59:56:12.4: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:04:15.68 +59:56:12.4: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 16.3566* 13 04 15.68 +59 56 12.4 12.4 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.8566,12.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.3566 12.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.64 12:57:52.79 +60:48:09.2
121.51573 56.30798 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 3.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:57:52.79 +60:48:09.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.729+/-0.030 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:57:52.79 +60:48:09.2: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:57:52.79 +60:48:09.2: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 16.3566* 12 57 52.79 +60 48 09.2 12.6 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.8566,12.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.3566 12.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.68 12:42:43.17 +61:17:27.6
124.79478 55.80571 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 2.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" Gaia DR3 1580119881243470464
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.430 G 13.470 G K
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:42:43.17 +61:17:27.6: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:42:43.17 +61:17:27.6: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 16.3566* 12 42 43.17 +61 17 27.6 12.7 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1580119881243470464,2461237.8566,12.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1580119881243470464 20260716.3566 12.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.32 13:58:06.35 +66:50:12.6
113.03206 48.99012 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:58:06.35 +66:50:12.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.377+/-0.033 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:58:06.35 +66:50:12.6: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:58:06.35 +66:50:12.6: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.8566,12.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.3566 12.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.35 13:49:21.42 +65:43:07.8
113.65843 50.35372 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:49:21.42 +65:43:07.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.342+/-0.030 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:49:21.42 +65:43:07.8: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:49:21.42 +65:43:07.8: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.8566,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.3566 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.37 12:52:39.73 +60:36:23.5
122.65961 56.52108 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:52:39.73 +60:36:23.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.332+/-0.030 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:52:39.73 +60:36:23.5: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:52:39.73 +60:36:23.5: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 16.3566* 12 52 39.73 +60 36 23.5 12.4 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.8566,12.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.3566 12.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.61 12:57:02.58 +59:56:54.4
121.63774 57.16572 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:57:02.58 +59:56:54.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.144+/-0.039 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:57:02.58 +59:56:54.4: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:57:02.58 +59:56:54.4: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 16.3566* 12 57 02.58 +59 56 54.4 12.6 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.8566,12.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.3566 12.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.21 13:27:24.58 +66:22:48.3
117.29890 50.35291 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:27:24.58 +66:22:48.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:27:24.58 +66:22:48.3: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:27:24.58 +66:22:48.3: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.8566,12.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.3566 12.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.23 13:28:57.93 +66:21:27.8
117.05291 50.33999 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:28:57.93 +66:21:27.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.372+/-0.030 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:28:57.93 +66:21:27.8: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:28:57.93 +66:21:27.8: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.8566,12.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.3566 12.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.16 13:48:55.63 +65:44:29.2
113.73565 50.34787 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 2.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" Gaia DR3 1672102412683313792
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.030 G 13.080 G G
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:48:55.63 +65:44:29.2: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:48:55.63 +65:44:29.2: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1672102412683313792,2461237.8566,12.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1672102412683313792 20260716.3566 12.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.51 13:50:20.30 +65:41:35.5
113.49622 50.34223 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:50:20.30 +65:41:35.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.308+/-0.035 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:50:20.30 +65:41:35.5: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:50:20.30 +65:41:35.5: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.8566,12.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.3566 12.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.28 13:49:34.68 +65:49:47.9
113.68589 50.24166 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:49:34.68 +65:49:47.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.644+/-0.028 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:49:34.68 +65:49:47.9: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:49:34.68 +65:49:47.9: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.8566,12.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.3566 12.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.47 13:08:45.72 +59:31:59.9
118.85003 57.45743 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:08:45.72 +59:31:59.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.417+/-0.036 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:08:45.72 +59:31:59.9: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:08:45.72 +59:31:59.9: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 16.3566* 13 08 45.72 +59 31 59.9 12.5 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.8566,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.3566 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.27 13:50:14.87 +65:46:43.6
113.55726 50.26548 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:50:14.87 +65:46:43.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.417+/-0.030 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:50:14.87 +65:46:43.6: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:50:14.87 +65:46:43.6: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.8566,12.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.3566 12.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 11.96 13:50:55.20 +65:36:52.6
113.36451 50.39429 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J207.7341+65.6135 | 13:50:55.20 +65:36:52.6 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.502+/-0.031 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:50:55.20 +65:36:52.6: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:50:55.20 +65:36:52.6: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J207.7341+65.6135,2461237.8566,11.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J207.7341+65.6135 20260716.3566 11.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.59 13:50:21.50 +65:31:14.8
113.39709 50.50268 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:50:21.50 +65:31:14.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.378+/-0.034 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:50:21.50 +65:31:14.8: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:50:21.50 +65:31:14.8: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.8566,12.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.3566 12.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.71 13:05:26.53 +60:01:05.8
119.71795 57.02250 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 3.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:05:26.53 +60:01:05.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.501+/-0.033 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:05:26.53 +60:01:05.8: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:05:26.53 +60:01:05.8: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 16.3566* 13 05 26.53 +60 01 05.8 12.7 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.8566,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.3566 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.62 13:26:21.28 +66:33:16.8
117.51846 50.20498 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 2.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:26:21.28 +66:33:16.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.600+/-0.028 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:26:21.28 +66:33:16.8: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:26:21.28 +66:33:16.8: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.8566,12.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.3566 12.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.68 13:25:29.22 +66:56:37.8
117.77461 49.84208 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 2.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" Gaia DR3 1684417698828369408
Type: DSCT|GDOR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.750 G 13.770 G F
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:25:29.22 +66:56:37.8: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:25:29.22 +66:56:37.8: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1684417698828369408,2461237.8566,12.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1684417698828369408 20260716.3566 12.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.79 13:25:25.82 +66:44:12.4
117.71728 50.04590 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:25:25.82 +66:44:12.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.399+/-0.030 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:25:25.82 +66:44:12.4: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:25:25.82 +66:44:12.4: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.8566,12.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.3566 12.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.63 13:30:17.73 +65:49:00.5
116.64832 50.83473 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:30:17.73 +65:49:00.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.365+/-0.034 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:30:17.73 +65:49:00.5: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:30:17.73 +65:49:00.5: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.8566,12.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.3566 12.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.52 12:52:36.94 +60:12:01.1
122.66378 56.92733 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:52:36.94 +60:12:01.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.364+/-0.029 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:52:36.94 +60:12:01.1: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:52:36.94 +60:12:01.1: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 16.3566* 12 52 36.94 +60 12 01.1 12.5 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.8566,12.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.3566 12.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.35 13:58:44.59 +66:54:55.4
112.99105 48.89336 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:58:44.59 +66:54:55.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.390+/-0.030 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:58:44.59 +66:54:55.4: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:58:44.59 +66:54:55.4: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.8566,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.3566 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.36 13:24:43.06 +66:53:15.4
117.87158 49.91238 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 1678413261533364736 | 13:24:43.06 +66:53:15.4 (user input) | 2021A&A...648A..44M | | (position from user input) (the VSX policy as of May 2022 seems to be NOT to regard variables from 2021A&A...648A..44M as 'known' for the lack of classification) J-Ks=0.454+/-0.027 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:24:43.06 +66:53:15.4: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:24:43.06 +66:53:15.4: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 1678413261533364736,2461237.8566,12.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 1678413261533364736 20260716.3566 12.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.31 13:25:07.50 +66:54:00.6
117.81473 49.89205 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1684417935050806400 | 13:25:06.30 +66:54:38.3 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.413+/-0.031 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:25:07.50 +66:54:00.6: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:25:07.50 +66:54:00.6: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1684417935050806400,2461237.8566,12.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1684417935050806400 20260716.3566 12.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.3566 2461237.8566 12.71 13:25:46.16 +66:48:30.4
117.68932 49.96889 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:25:46.16 +66:48:30.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.360+/-0.029 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:25:46.16 +66:48:30.4: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:25:46.16 +66:48:30.4: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.8566,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.3566 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461199.75768347 08.06.2026 06:10:53.852 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
First image: 2461199.75768347 08.06.2026 06:10:53.852 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Last image: 2461237.85693742 16.07.2026 08:33:49.393 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6174
Objects passed selection criteria: 6135
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3647.5
Average stars matched: 3554.25 (97.4435 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115472 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 15 19:22:19 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-155-g87a29d73
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 16 03:48:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461199.75768347 08.06.2026 06:10:53.852 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
First image: 2461199.75768347 08.06.2026 06:10:53.852 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Last image: 2461237.85693742 16.07.2026 08:33:49.393 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 165
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 31401
Objects passed selection criteria: 31274
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 19967.8
Average stars matched: 19305 (96.6809 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 137856 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 15 19:22:19 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-155-g87a29d73
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 16 03:50:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461237.85628647
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:47.974 +62:00:28.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:43:04.159 +61:58:32.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.974 +62:00:28.69
Second-epoch image center 13:43:04.159 +61:58:32.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0452 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:43:06.671 +61:58:32.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.974 +62:00:28.69
Second-epoch image center 13:43:06.671 +61:58:32.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0487 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:43:04.159 +61:58:32.80
Second-epoch second image center 13:43:06.671 +61:58:32.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00492 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SRdYFTypv9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0LN5vM2ZRf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9raoddaXIO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Bcy4KWb6hb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6077 to 224.9727 deg, Dec +55.8957 to +67.2618 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6077 to 224.9727 deg, Dec 55.8957 to 67.2618 deg
Loaded 6073 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3949 out of 4055 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4055 out of 6503 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.660900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.660900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6077 to 224.9727 deg, Dec +55.8957 to +67.2618 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6077 to 224.9727 deg, Dec 55.8957 to 67.2618 deg
Loaded 6073 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3949 out of 4055 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4055 out of 6503 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 6522 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6080 to 224.9737 deg, Dec +55.8906 to +67.2581 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6080 to 224.9737 deg, Dec 55.8906 to 67.2581 deg
Loaded 6074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3941 out of 4061 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4061 out of 6522 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
2.4 pix UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
2.4 pix wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
2.4 pix wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
15.2 mag. UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
13.2 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
12.9 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.9 (SNR ) 10.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.SRdYFTypv9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=380, bad_region=0, passed=6503
Got 6503 stars (including 6118 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6444 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6443 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6443 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.385 n_q1=246 n_q2=240 n_q3=235 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.210
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0LN5vM2ZRf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=400, bad_region=0, passed=6522
Got 6522 stars (including 6118 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6522 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.423 n_q1=249 n_q2=247 n_q3=229 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.122
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9raoddaXIO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=35, bad_region=0, passed=803
Got 803 stars (including 766 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 803 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 732 to 788 (Dec 56.4 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 744 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 743 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 682 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 743 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 732 to 788 (Dec 56.4 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 745 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 744 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 744 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 744 stars left (next iteration limit 817)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits N_match=744 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.501 n_q1=122 n_q2=280 n_q3=43 n_q4=299 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Bcy4KWb6hb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=37, bad_region=0, passed=845
Got 845 stars (including 806 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 845 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 783 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 783 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 781 stars left (next iteration limit 860)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits N_match=781 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.939 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.488 n_q1=121 n_q2=288 n_q3=37 n_q4=335 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.837
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits sigma_overall=0.422 worst_q_ratio=1.210
ref2=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits sigma_overall=0.420 worst_q_ratio=1.122
new1=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits sigma_overall=0.490 worst_q_ratio=1.224
new2=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits sigma_overall=0.511 worst_q_ratio=1.837
reference average sigma_overall=0.421 worst_q_ratio=1.166
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212_astrometric_residuals.png (744 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213_astrometric_residuals.png (781 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:47.974 +62:00:28.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:43:04.159 +61:58:32.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.974 +62:00:28.69
Second-epoch image center 13:43:04.159 +61:58:32.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0452 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:43:06.671 +61:58:32.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.974 +62:00:28.69
Second-epoch image center 13:43:06.671 +61:58:32.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0487 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:43:04.159 +61:58:32.80
Second-epoch second image center 13:43:06.671 +61:58:32.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00492 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4aZsnOVToA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.S3EzX0IZdu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits &> /tmp/tmp.junxHdN25D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uJCuYwB2OF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 33815 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3048 to 225.2587 deg, Dec +55.8958 to +67.2698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3048 to 225.2587 deg, Dec 55.8958 to 67.2698 deg
Loaded 6169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3798 out of 4107 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4107 out of 33815 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.540800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.540800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 33815 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3048 to 225.2587 deg, Dec +55.8958 to +67.2698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3048 to 225.2587 deg, Dec 55.8958 to 67.2698 deg
Loaded 6169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3798 out of 4107 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4107 out of 33815 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 33636 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3053 to 225.2579 deg, Dec +55.8906 to +67.2588 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3053 to 225.2579 deg, Dec 55.8906 to 67.2588 deg
Loaded 6168 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3791 out of 4106 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4106 out of 33636 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 132 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
2.2 pix UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
2.1 pix fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
2.1 pix fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
2.2 pix wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
2.2 pix wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
15.3 mag. UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
13.0 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
13.4 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.0 (SNR ) 12.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4aZsnOVToA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1409, bad_region=1, passed=33795
Got 33795 stars (including 32344 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33795 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33407 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33409 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33409 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.412 n_q1=247 n_q2=250 n_q3=222 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.167
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.S3EzX0IZdu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=1410, bad_region=0, passed=33603
Got 33603 stars (including 32157 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33603 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.439 n_q1=247 n_q2=258 n_q3=218 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.050
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.junxHdN25D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=102, bad_region=25, passed=6435
Got 6435 stars (including 6293 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6435 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.477 n_q1=164 n_q2=372 n_q3=56 n_q4=365 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.362
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uJCuYwB2OF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=107, bad_region=27, passed=6681
Got 6681 stars (including 6533 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6681 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6221 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6221 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.709 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.505 n_q1=172 n_q2=367 n_q3=46 n_q4=381 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.449
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-32-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-16_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_033430_TTUQ1b1x1_2296623_x6wHfDan/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:39:22.58 +62:11:28.9: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:39:22.58 +62:11:28.9: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:39:22.58 +62:11:28.9: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2191 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:34:02.28 +66:15:31.1: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:50:16.27 +65:23:37.3: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:24:45.54 +67:02:01.9: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:04:15.68 +59:56:12.4: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:57:52.79 +60:48:09.2: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:42:43.17 +61:17:27.6: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:52:39.73 +60:36:23.5: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:57:02.58 +59:56:54.4: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:49:21.42 +65:43:07.8: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:58:06.35 +66:50:12.6: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:34:02.28 +66:15:31.1: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:24:45.54 +67:02:01.9: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:50:16.27 +65:23:37.3: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:34:02.28 +66:15:31.1: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6423 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:24:45.54 +67:02:01.9: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4988 delta=1.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:50:16.27 +65:23:37.3: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3955 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:04:15.68 +59:56:12.4: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:04:15.68 +59:56:12.4: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3710 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:57:52.79 +60:48:09.2: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:57:52.79 +60:48:09.2: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6428 delta=1.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:42:43.17 +61:17:27.6: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:42:43.17 +61:17:27.6: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6863 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:57:02.58 +59:56:54.4: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:49:21.42 +65:43:07.8: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:52:39.73 +60:36:23.5: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:57:02.58 +59:56:54.4: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6291 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:58:06.35 +66:50:12.6: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:49:21.42 +65:43:07.8: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2409 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:52:39.73 +60:36:23.5: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3590 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:58:06.35 +66:50:12.6: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3663 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:27:24.58 +66:22:48.3: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:27:24.58 +66:22:48.3: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:27:24.58 +66:22:48.3: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2285 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:28:57.93 +66:21:27.8: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:28:57.93 +66:21:27.8: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:28:57.93 +66:21:27.8: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2562 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:50:20.30 +65:41:35.5: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:08:45.72 +59:31:59.9: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:50:14.87 +65:46:43.6: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:50:21.50 +65:31:14.8: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:50:55.20 +65:36:52.6: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:28:20.88 +66:10:17.5: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:49:34.68 +65:49:47.9: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:48:55.63 +65:44:29.2: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:50:20.30 +65:41:35.5: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:48:55.63 +65:44:29.2: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:08:45.72 +59:31:59.9: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:50:55.20 +65:36:52.6: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:50:21.50 +65:31:14.8: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:49:34.68 +65:49:47.9: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:50:14.87 +65:46:43.6: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:50:20.30 +65:41:35.5: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5057 delta=1.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:48:55.63 +65:44:29.2: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0760 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:08:45.72 +59:31:59.9: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4845 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:50:55.20 +65:36:52.6: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8972 delta=1.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:50:21.50 +65:31:14.8: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6069 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:28:20.88 +66:10:17.5: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:49:34.68 +65:49:47.9: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2223 delta=1.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:50:14.87 +65:46:43.6: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1878 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:28:20.88 +66:10:17.5: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2561 delta=0.85 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:05:26.53 +60:01:05.8: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:05:26.53 +60:01:05.8: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:05:26.53 +60:01:05.8: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7300 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:26:21.28 +66:33:16.8: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:25:29.22 +66:56:37.8: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:25:29.22 +66:56:37.8: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:25:29.22 +66:56:37.8: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6888 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:26:21.28 +66:33:16.8: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:26:21.28 +66:33:16.8: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6373 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:25:25.82 +66:44:12.4: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:25:25.82 +66:44:12.4: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:25:25.82 +66:44:12.4: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8093 delta=1.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:30:17.73 +65:49:00.5: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:30:17.73 +65:49:00.5: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:30:17.73 +65:49:00.5: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6452 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:52:36.94 +60:12:01.1: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:52:36.94 +60:12:01.1: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:52:36.94 +60:12:01.1: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5383 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:58:44.59 +66:54:55.4: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:58:44.59 +66:54:55.4: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:58:44.59 +66:54:55.4: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3774 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:24:43.06 +66:53:15.4: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:25:46.16 +66:48:30.4: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:24:43.06 +66:53:15.4: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:25:07.50 +66:54:00.6: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:24:43.06 +66:53:15.4: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3673 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:31:28.33 +65:26:48.0: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:25:07.50 +66:54:00.6: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:25:46.16 +66:48:30.4: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:25:07.50 +66:54:00.6: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3248 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:25:46.16 +66:48:30.4: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7347 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:31:28.33 +65:26:48.0: 13.33 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:28.33 +65:26:48.0: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4090 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out00674.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out00970.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out00994.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out01115.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out01162.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out01257.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out01476.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out01710.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02336.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02921.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out03045.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out03435.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04830.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04884.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04972.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05115.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05178.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05263.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05482.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05861.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out06304.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out17894.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20652.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20932.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30927.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31133.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32552.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32764.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33008.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 50s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 18s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52248_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52248_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:55:38.26 +65:26:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52250_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52250_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52265_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52265_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52273_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52273_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52279_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52279_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52280_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52280_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52286_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52286_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52291_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52291_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52298_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52298_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52299_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52299_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52302_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52302_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52309_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52309_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52312_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52312_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52333_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52333_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52345_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52345_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52348_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52348_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52352_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52352_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52353_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52353_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52354_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52354_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52359_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52359_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52360_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52360_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52363_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52363_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52364_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52364_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52367_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52367_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52368_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52368_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52369_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52369_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52371_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52371_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52376_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52376_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52379_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52379_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52382_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52382_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52385_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52385_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52388_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52388_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52390_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52390_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52394_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52394_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52396_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52396_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52399_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52399_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52400_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52400_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52402_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52402_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52405_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52405_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52406_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52406_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52409_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52409_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52411_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52411_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52413_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52413_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52415_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52415_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52418_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52418_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52419_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52419_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52421_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52421_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52426_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52426_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52429_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52429_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52430_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52430_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52438_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52438_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52439_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52439_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52440_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52440_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52441_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52441_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52445_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52445_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52446_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52446_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52448_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52448_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52450_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52450_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52451_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52451_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52455_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52455_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52458_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52458_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52459_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52459_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52462_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52462_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52466_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52466_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52476_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52476_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52478_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52478_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52481_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52481_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52484_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52484_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52488_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52488_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52498_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52498_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52502_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52502_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52505_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52505_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52508_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52508_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52510_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52510_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52515_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52515_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52517_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52517_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52520_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52520_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52523_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52523_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52527_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52527_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52529_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52529_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52530_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52530_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52532_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52532_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52533_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52533_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52536_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52536_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52539_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52539_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52540_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52540_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52541_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52541_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52542_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52542_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52545_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52545_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52546_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52546_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52553_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52553_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52554_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52554_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52556_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52556_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52558_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52558_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52559_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52559_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52561_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52561_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52562_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52562_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52565_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52565_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52567_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52567_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52569_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52569_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52571_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52571_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03435_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 03435_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06304_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 06304_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00674_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 00674_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32552_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 32552_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20652_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 20652_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17894_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 17894_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01257_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 01257_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05178_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 05178_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20932_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 20932_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33008_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 33008_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02921_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 02921_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03045_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 03045_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05115_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 05115_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05263_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 05263_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04830_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 04830_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30927_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 30927_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04972_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 04972_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03651_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 03651_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05482_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 05482_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05861_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 05861_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32764_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 32764_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02336_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 02336_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00994_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 00994_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01710_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 01710_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04884_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 04884_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31133_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 31133_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00970_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 00970_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01162_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 01162_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01115_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 01115_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01476_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 01476_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02891_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 02891_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-16_03-33-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 3s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 71s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
13:24:45.54 +67:02:01.9
13:58:44.59 +66:54:55.4
13:25:29.22 +66:56:37.8
13:25:07.50 +66:54:00.6
13:24:43.06 +66:53:15.4
13:58:06.35 +66:50:12.6
13:25:46.16 +66:48:30.4
13:25:25.82 +66:44:12.4
13:26:21.28 +66:33:16.8
13:27:24.58 +66:22:48.3
13:28:57.93 +66:21:27.8
13:34:02.28 +66:15:31.1
13:49:34.68 +65:49:47.9
13:30:17.73 +65:49:00.5
13:50:14.87 +65:46:43.6
13:48:55.63 +65:44:29.2
13:49:21.42 +65:43:07.8
13:50:20.30 +65:41:35.5
13:50:55.20 +65:36:52.6
13:50:21.50 +65:31:14.8
13:50:16.27 +65:23:37.3
12:42:43.17 +61:17:27.6
12:57:52.79 +60:48:09.2
12:52:39.73 +60:36:23.5
13:08:45.72 +59:31:59.9
12:52:36.94 +60:12:01.1
13:04:15.68 +59:56:12.4
13:05:26.53 +60:01:05.8
12:57:02.58 +59:56:54.4
########### Completed UMa-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
13:34:02.28 +66:15:31.1
13:50:16.27 +65:23:37.3
13:24:45.54 +67:02:01.9
13:04:15.68 +59:56:12.4
12:57:52.79 +60:48:09.2
12:42:43.17 +61:17:27.6
13:58:06.35 +66:50:12.6
13:49:21.42 +65:43:07.8
12:52:39.73 +60:36:23.5
12:57:02.58 +59:56:54.4
13:27:24.58 +66:22:48.3
13:28:57.93 +66:21:27.8
13:48:55.63 +65:44:29.2
13:50:20.30 +65:41:35.5
13:49:34.68 +65:49:47.9
13:08:45.72 +59:31:59.9
13:50:14.87 +65:46:43.6
13:50:55.20 +65:36:52.6
13:50:21.50 +65:31:14.8
13:05:26.53 +60:01:05.8
13:26:21.28 +66:33:16.8
13:25:29.22 +66:56:37.8
13:25:25.82 +66:44:12.4
13:30:17.73 +65:49:00.5
12:52:36.94 +60:12:01.1
13:58:44.59 +66:54:55.4
13:24:43.06 +66:53:15.4
13:25:07.50 +66:54:00.6
13:25:46.16 +66:48:30.4
###################################################################################
13:34:02.28 +66:15:31.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:50:16.27 +65:23:37.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:24:45.54 +67:02:01.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:04:15.68 +59:56:12.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:57:52.79 +60:48:09.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:42:43.17 +61:17:27.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:58:06.35 +66:50:12.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:49:21.42 +65:43:07.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:52:39.73 +60:36:23.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:57:02.58 +59:56:54.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:27:24.58 +66:22:48.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:28:57.93 +66:21:27.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:48:55.63 +65:44:29.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:50:20.30 +65:41:35.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:49:34.68 +65:49:47.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:08:45.72 +59:31:59.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:50:14.87 +65:46:43.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:50:55.20 +65:36:52.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:50:21.50 +65:31:14.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:05:26.53 +60:01:05.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:26:21.28 +66:33:16.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:25:29.22 +66:56:37.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:25:25.82 +66:44:12.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:30:17.73 +65:49:00.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:52:36.94 +60:12:01.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:58:44.59 +66:54:55.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:24:43.06 +66:53:15.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:25:07.50 +66:54:00.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:25:46.16 +66:48:30.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
12:42:43.17 +61:17:27.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:52:36.94 +60:12:01.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:52:39.73 +60:36:23.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:57:02.58 +59:56:54.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:57:52.79 +60:48:09.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:04:15.68 +59:56:12.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:05:26.53 +60:01:05.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:08:45.72 +59:31:59.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:24:43.06 +66:53:15.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:24:45.54 +67:02:01.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:25:07.50 +66:54:00.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:25:25.82 +66:44:12.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:25:29.22 +66:56:37.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:25:46.16 +66:48:30.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:26:21.28 +66:33:16.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:27:24.58 +66:22:48.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:28:57.93 +66:21:27.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:30:17.73 +65:49:00.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:34:02.28 +66:15:31.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:48:55.63 +65:44:29.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:49:21.42 +65:43:07.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:49:34.68 +65:49:47.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:50:14.87 +65:46:43.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:50:16.27 +65:23:37.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:50:20.30 +65:41:35.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:50:21.50 +65:31:14.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:50:55.20 +65:36:52.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:58:06.35 +66:50:12.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:58:44.59 +66:54:55.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
12:42:43.17 +61:17:27.6 -- a known variable star
12:52:36.94 +60:12:01.1 -- not a known variable star
12:52:39.73 +60:36:23.5 -- not a known variable star
12:57:02.58 +59:56:54.4 -- not a known variable star
12:57:52.79 +60:48:09.2 -- not a known variable star
13:04:15.68 +59:56:12.4 -- not a known variable star
13:05:26.53 +60:01:05.8 -- not a known variable star
13:08:45.72 +59:31:59.9 -- not a known variable star
13:24:43.06 +66:53:15.4 -- not a known variable star
13:24:45.54 +67:02:01.9 -- not a known variable star
13:25:07.50 +66:54:00.6 -- not a known variable star
13:25:25.82 +66:44:12.4 -- not a known variable star
13:25:29.22 +66:56:37.8 -- a known variable star
13:25:46.16 +66:48:30.4 -- not a known variable star
13:26:21.28 +66:33:16.8 -- not a known variable star
13:27:24.58 +66:22:48.3 -- not a known variable star
13:28:57.93 +66:21:27.8 -- not a known variable star
13:30:17.73 +65:49:00.5 -- not a known variable star
13:34:02.28 +66:15:31.1 -- not a known variable star
13:48:55.63 +65:44:29.2 -- a known variable star
13:49:21.42 +65:43:07.8 -- not a known variable star
13:49:34.68 +65:49:47.9 -- not a known variable star
13:50:14.87 +65:46:43.6 -- not a known variable star
13:50:16.27 +65:23:37.3 -- not a known variable star
13:50:20.30 +65:41:35.5 -- not a known variable star
13:50:21.50 +65:31:14.8 -- not a known variable star
13:50:55.20 +65:36:52.6 -- not a known variable star
13:58:06.35 +66:50:12.6 -- not a known variable star
13:58:44.59 +66:54:55.4 -- not a known variable star
Found 26 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
29 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
12:42:43.17 +61:17:27.6
12:52:36.94 +60:12:01.1
12:52:39.73 +60:36:23.5
12:57:02.58 +59:56:54.4
12:57:52.79 +60:48:09.2
13:04:15.68 +59:56:12.4
13:05:26.53 +60:01:05.8
13:08:45.72 +59:31:59.9
13:24:43.06 +66:53:15.4
13:24:45.54 +67:02:01.9
13:25:07.50 +66:54:00.6
13:25:25.82 +66:44:12.4
13:25:29.22 +66:56:37.8
13:25:46.16 +66:48:30.4
13:26:21.28 +66:33:16.8
13:27:24.58 +66:22:48.3
13:28:57.93 +66:21:27.8
13:30:17.73 +65:49:00.5
13:34:02.28 +66:15:31.1
13:48:55.63 +65:44:29.2
13:49:21.42 +65:43:07.8
13:49:34.68 +65:49:47.9
13:50:14.87 +65:46:43.6
13:50:16.27 +65:23:37.3
13:50:20.30 +65:41:35.5
13:50:21.50 +65:31:14.8
13:50:55.20 +65:36:52.6
13:58:06.35 +66:50:12.6
13:58:44.59 +66:54:55.4
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461237.85628647 -observatory V36
07:16:34.71 +17:18:11.7 Mercury (4.8mag)
10:36:23.45 +09:58:51.5 Venus (-4.1mag)
04:41:58.65 +22:06:41.4 Mars (1.3mag)
08:22:08.62 +19:53:56.3 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:23.92 +03:22:06.6 Saturn (0.7mag)
04:08:20.74 +20:48:02.6 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:57.74 +00:19:56.3 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:30:21.28 -23:20:39.2 Pluto (14.4mag)
09:31:54.78 +14:46:34.6 Moon (-8.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jul 16 03:48 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461237.85628647:
08:22:08.17 +19:53:57.4 Io (6.0mag)
08:22:00.12 +19:54:29.6 Europa (6.3mag)
08:22:14.66 +19:53:37.5 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:21:45.49 +19:55:21.9 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:20:24.14 +19:40:44.7 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:22:06.78 +19:54:04.4 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:19:44.91 +19:43:53.2 Elara (17.7mag)
08:25:51.40 +19:44:54.4 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:26:45.62 +19:59:55.1 Carme (19.0mag)
00:56:35.83 +03:21:52.4 Titan (8.5mag)
00:56:26.23 +03:21:51.7 Rhea (9.8mag)
00:55:49.12 +03:20:12.7 Iapetus (11.2mag)
00:56:10.54 +03:22:18.0 Hyperion (14.5mag)
00:56:16.60 +03:18:28.0 Phoebe (16.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 16 03:48 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461237.85628647:
17:54:55.76 -31:34:21.4 JWST
17:42:06.45 +35:07:42.5 Chandra
04:21:28.05 +54:16:41.5 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 16 03:48 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461237.85628647 -observatory V36
02:44:42.10 +15:07:36.7 17.8mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:13:28.79 -34:30:29.8 13.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:31:40.32 -68:14:43.9 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:02:52.07 +32:33:02.8 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
02:19:18.34 +18:36:33.6 15.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:55:47.06 +32:15:00.9 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:19:12.07 +26:52:05.8 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:00:47.06 +29:30:39.0 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:13:38.09 +05:06:17.1 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:03:38.27 +21:02:35.3 18.0mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:11:07.32 -11:32:01.6 17.8mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:41:46.07 +67:32:12.5 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
16:19:32.48 -10:42:04.4 14.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:11:11.47 +66:02:21.1 17.9mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:40:36.17 +30:18:10.3 14.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:13:35.35 +15:28:00.7 17.6mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:33:32.00 +40:29:57.8 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:41:05.94 +46:52:26.8 17.8mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
04:55:15.74 -13:32:27.1 15.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:39:29.17 +28:04:01.6 18.0mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:18:25.72 -13:26:41.3 16.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:03:10.55 +22:10:08.7 17.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:46:45.93 +03:40:04.9 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:35:43.75 +79:09:29.9 17.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:52:21.08 +45:29:28.0 16.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:29:27.05 +05:33:53.6 17.0mag A/2026 E1
21:28:17.85 -17:20:15.7 7.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:16:20.76 -02:09:14.2 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:08:45.86 +30:11:52.0 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
10:20:36.17 +12:05:23.6 17.1mag 63P/Wild
00:50:45.22 -05:02:51.5 15.5mag 65P/Gunn
04:41:53.73 +20:27:25.0 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
02:31:48.34 +11:24:30.5 16.3mag 88P/Howell
06:53:15.21 +30:08:07.2 15.8mag 93P/Lovas
04:40:36.08 +31:18:30.3 16.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
08:23:22.01 +30:00:20.2 15.2mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:59:23.29 -01:14:54.8 16.9mag 124P/Mrkos
05:01:20.63 +20:58:10.2 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
05:47:31.81 +19:38:47.5 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
00:02:58.68 +03:08:56.1 17.9mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
07:35:09.56 +15:41:40.3 16.3mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:19:10.66 -20:37:37.2 15.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
05:54:43.77 +35:09:29.5 15.4mag 162P/SidingSpring
18:46:34.34 +19:04:02.4 14.2mag 169P/NEAT
01:55:11.24 +08:13:52.8 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:35:30.08 -08:38:49.6 17.2mag 235P/LINEAR
08:57:52.65 +32:43:51.4 18.0mag 240P/NEAT
20:39:08.54 -50:48:11.3 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
02:16:11.70 +14:54:06.1 15.6mag 260P/McNaught
05:55:30.37 +37:16:33.4 17.4mag 295P/LINEAR
15:06:29.48 +05:30:28.4 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski
08:40:01.01 +19:25:41.9 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
08:01:09.74 +38:42:50.9 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.6K Jul 16 03:48 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.47 -16:06:07.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.24 16.32
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 2026-07-5.01 16.82
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 2026-07-5.01 16.82
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 16 03:48 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 16 03:48 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
18:58:49.786 -21:29:54.27 AT 2026ssv 2026-07-06.26 21.93
21:15:32.626 -21:37:53.76 AT 2026ssu 2026-06-27.33 21.39
22:49:45.273 -15:16:33.71 AT 2026sst 2026-06-27.41 21.88
22:21:22.865 -18:28:38.60 AT 2026sss 2026-06-26.37 22.73
21:48:11.294 -15:58:33.77 AT 2026ssr 2026-06-26.41 21.95
21:56:29.244 -10:33:36.38 AT 2026ssq 2026-06-26.39 22.31
22:04:36.634 -18:37:38.63 AT 2026ssp 2026-06-26.37 22.56
21:52:03.725 -20:04:23.97 AT 2026sso 2026-06-26.39 22.15
22:28:31.768 -14:13:03.02 AT 2026ssn 2026-06-26.40 23.19
22:10:38.868 -20:00:07.81 AT 2026ssm 2026-06-26.37 21.5
00:37:08.843 -05:37:20.31 AT 2026ssl 2026-06-23.58 20.49
16:50:39.367 +12:02:04.48 AT 2026ssk 2026-06-23.30 21.04
21:28:51.588 -30:52:46.37 AT 2026ssj 2026-06-23.54 20.48
13:14:31.067 +38:32:01.92 AT 2026ssi 2026-06-11.32 19.048
00:23:13.025 -04:43:14.99 AT 2026ssh 2026-06-23.58 20.7
21:26:53.186 +04:17:24.51 AT 2026ssg 2026-06-23.48 20.92
22:34:24.397 -29:59:37.51 AT 2026ssf 2026-06-25.56 20.68
22:26:15.310 -27:42:10.55 AT 2026sse 2026-06-25.56 21.41
22:13:00.422 -28:48:04.48 AT 2026ssd 2026-06-25.55 21.47
22:13:31.243 -26:34:31.26 AT 2026ssc 2026-06-25.55 21.32
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Jul 16 03:48 tns_transients_list.txt
