This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.1823 2461237.6823 14.54 11:17:30.54 +43:17:29.9
166.40998 65.07001 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.1" and 0.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:17:30.54 +43:17:29.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:17:30.54 +43:17:29.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits at 11:17:30.54 +43:17:29.9: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 16.1823* 11 17 30.54 +43 17 29.9 14.5 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.6823,14.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.1823 14.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.1823 2461237.6823 14.56 11:13:10.14 +44:47:26.0
164.50053 63.59642 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.9" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:13:10.14 +44:47:26.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:13:10.14 +44:47:26.0: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits at 11:13:10.14 +44:47:26.0: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 16.1823* 11 13 10.14 +44 47 26.0 14.6 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.6823,14.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.1823 14.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.1823 2461237.6823 14.36 11:18:47.36 +42:01:00.2
168.72528 65.94165 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.5" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:18:47.36 +42:01:00.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:18:47.36 +42:01:00.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits at 11:18:47.36 +42:01:00.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 16.1823* 11 18 47.36 +42 01 00.2 14.4 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.6823,14.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.1823 14.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.1823 2461237.6823 14.60 11:03:22.06 +41:30:51.6
172.90244 63.62633 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.1" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:03:22.06 +41:30:51.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:03:22.06 +41:30:51.6: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits at 11:03:22.06 +41:30:51.6: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 16.1823* 11 03 22.06 +41 30 51.6 14.6 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.6823,14.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.1823 14.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.1823 2461237.6823 14.73 11:02:17.40 +49:54:42.0
158.04084 59.11495 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.8" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:02:17.40 +49:54:42.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:02:17.40 +49:54:42.0: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits at 11:02:17.40 +49:54:42.0: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 16.1823* 11 02 17.40 +49 54 42.0 14.7 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.6823,14.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.1823 14.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.1823 2461237.6823 14.27 10:15:34.10 +44:39:36.1
173.07830 54.36069 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.0" and 0.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:15:34.10 +44:39:36.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:15:34.10 +44:39:36.1: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits at 10:15:34.10 +44:39:36.1: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 16.1823* 10 15 34.10 +44 39 36.1 14.3 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.6823,14.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.1823 14.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.1823 2461237.6823 14.35 10:18:54.61 +44:46:47.0
172.58651 54.89519 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 0.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:18:54.61 +44:46:47.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:18:54.61 +44:46:47.0: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits at 10:18:54.61 +44:46:47.0: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 16.1823* 10 18 54.61 +44 46 47.0 14.3 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461237.6823,14.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260716.1823 14.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.78748612 22.02.2026 06:53:48.801 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
First image: 2461093.78748612 22.02.2026 06:53:48.801 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Last image: 2461237.68258756 16.07.2026 04:22:45.565 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6846
Objects passed selection criteria: 6824
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5286.25
Average stars matched: 5124.5 (96.9402 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115880 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 15 19:22:19 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-155-g87a29d73
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 16 01:02:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.78748612 22.02.2026 06:53:48.801 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
First image: 2461093.78748612 22.02.2026 06:53:48.801 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Last image: 2461237.68258756 16.07.2026 04:22:45.565 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 146
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 32980
Objects passed selection criteria: 32896
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 27845
Average stars matched: 26571.5 (95.4265 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 138204 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 15 19:22:19 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-155-g87a29d73
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 16 01:05:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461237.68209743
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits'
wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:07.784 +46:00:40.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88
Second-epoch image center 10:48:07.784 +46:00:40.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0209 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:07.876 +46:00:45.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88
Second-epoch image center 10:48:07.876 +46:00:45.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0218 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:48:07.784 +46:00:40.15
Second-epoch second image center 10:48:07.876 +46:00:45.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00144 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00144 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RXtob6RIIn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pTQrtebmC6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cG0sMWZT5p
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits &> /tmp/tmp.a2IAvhq2Zh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2907 to 173.9078 deg, Dec +39.8246 to +51.3881 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2907 to 173.9078 deg, Dec 39.8246 to 51.3881 deg
Loaded 4560 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3127 out of 3305 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3305 out of 6977 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.930900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.930900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2907 to 173.9078 deg, Dec +39.8246 to +51.3881 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2907 to 173.9078 deg, Dec 39.8246 to 51.3881 deg
Loaded 4560 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3127 out of 3305 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3305 out of 6977 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 7010 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.5320 to 173.9073 deg, Dec +39.8247 to +51.3880 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.5320 to 173.9073 deg, Dec 39.8247 to 51.3880 deg
Loaded 4505 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3133 out of 3306 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3306 out of 7010 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
2.2 pix UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
2.2 pix wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
2.2 pix wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
14.5 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
14.5 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.RXtob6RIIn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=476, bad_region=0, passed=6977
Got 6977 stars (including 6493 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=223 n_q2=254 n_q3=246 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pTQrtebmC6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=470, bad_region=0, passed=7010
Got 7010 stars (including 6532 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7010 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=229 n_q2=256 n_q3=238 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cG0sMWZT5p (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=267, bad_region=0, passed=3687
Got 3687 stars (including 3417 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3687 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3649 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3649 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3649 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.473 n_q1=256 n_q2=230 n_q3=273 n_q4=197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.a2IAvhq2Zh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=241, bad_region=0, passed=3632
Got 3632 stars (including 3386 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3632 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=256 n_q2=227 n_q3=278 n_q4=196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits sigma_overall=0.384 worst_q_ratio=1.244
ref2=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.215
new1=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.250
new2=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.176
reference average sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.2295
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300_astrometric_residuals.png (955 matched stars from wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097_astrometric_residuals.png (957 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:07.784 +46:00:40.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88
Second-epoch image center 10:48:07.784 +46:00:40.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0209 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:07.876 +46:00:45.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88
Second-epoch image center 10:48:07.876 +46:00:45.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0218 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:48:07.784 +46:00:40.15
Second-epoch second image center 10:48:07.876 +46:00:45.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00144 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00144 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PJoIRYX06R
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fhmOAaMvcJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BC4tSnQQke
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Rf4B4uTCvK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34182 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2627 to 173.9078 deg, Dec +39.8246 to +51.4078 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2627 to 173.9078 deg, Dec 39.8246 to 51.4078 deg
Loaded 4573 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2964 out of 3314 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3314 out of 34182 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.821150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.821150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 34182 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2627 to 173.9078 deg, Dec +39.8246 to +51.4078 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2627 to 173.9078 deg, Dec 39.8246 to 51.4078 deg
Loaded 4573 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2964 out of 3314 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3314 out of 34182 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 34144 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2629 to 173.9073 deg, Dec +39.8247 to +51.3954 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2629 to 173.9073 deg, Dec 39.8247 to 51.3954 deg
Loaded 4566 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2969 out of 3312 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3312 out of 34144 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 132 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
2.1 pix UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
2.1 pix fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
2.1 pix fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
14.7 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
14.7 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.PJoIRYX06R (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1513, bad_region=9, passed=34161
Got 34161 stars (including 32570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34161 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=222 n_q2=251 n_q3=249 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fhmOAaMvcJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1511, bad_region=9, passed=34129
Got 34129 stars (including 32556 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34129 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=228 n_q2=249 n_q3=247 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BC4tSnQQke (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1201, bad_region=23, passed=22135
Got 22135 stars (including 20871 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22135 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.453 n_q1=255 n_q2=234 n_q3=271 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.237
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Rf4B4uTCvK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1040, bad_region=25, passed=22011
Got 22011 stars (including 20905 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22011 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.440 n_q1=256 n_q2=230 n_q3=274 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.210
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_232454_TTUQ1b1x1_251140_JTsqIpYG/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:55:41.56 +48:41:43.3: 14.60 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits at 10:55:41.56 +48:41:43.3: 14.69 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:55:41.56 +48:41:43.3: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4847 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:41:13.89 +48:38:57.6: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits at 10:41:13.89 +48:38:57.6: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:13.89 +48:38:57.6: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9862 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:02:52.24 +50:13:34.1: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits at 11:02:52.24 +50:13:34.1: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:02:12.24 +43:29:48.9: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:02:52.24 +50:13:34.1: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6018 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:16:31.96 +45:24:40.6: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits at 11:02:12.24 +43:29:48.9: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:02:12.24 +43:29:48.9: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4754 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits at 10:16:31.96 +45:24:40.6: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:16:31.96 +45:24:40.6: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3385 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:18:55.68 +49:13:28.2: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits at 10:18:55.68 +49:13:28.2: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:18:55.68 +49:13:28.2: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7489 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:44:34.27 +47:03:53.1: 13.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits at 10:44:34.27 +47:03:53.1: 13.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:44:34.27 +47:03:53.1: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9802 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:13:10.14 +44:47:26.0: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:17:30.54 +43:17:29.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits at 11:13:10.14 +44:47:26.0: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:18:47.36 +42:01:00.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits at 11:17:30.54 +43:17:29.9: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits at 11:18:47.36 +42:01:00.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:03:22.06 +41:30:51.6: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:02:17.40 +49:54:42.0: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:18:54.61 +44:46:47.0: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:15:34.10 +44:39:36.1: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits at 11:03:22.06 +41:30:51.6: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:30:14.66 +47:57:04.0: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits at 11:02:17.40 +49:54:42.0: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits at 10:18:54.61 +44:46:47.0: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits at 10:15:34.10 +44:39:36.1: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0301.fits at 10:30:14.66 +47:57:04.0: 13.95 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:30:14.66 +47:57:04.0: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.3214 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54177.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54186.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54236.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54324.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54326.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54336.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54337.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 35s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52279_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52279_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52285_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52285_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:44:03.63 +49:26:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52297_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52297_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52302_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52302_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:51:00.87 +46:13:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52303_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52303_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:59:42.61 +50:10:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52305_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52305_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:32:04.11 +49:15:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52454_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52454_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52464_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52464_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52502_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52502_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52516_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52516_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52533_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52533_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52547_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52547_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52582_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52582_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:16:46.09 +49:26:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52587_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52587_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52601_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52601_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52623_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52623_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52641_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52641_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52642_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52642_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:53:27.74 +49:13:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52649_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52649_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52667_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52667_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52691_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52691_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:20:39.52 +45:00:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52707_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52707_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52730_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52730_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52749_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52749_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52788_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52788_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52800_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52800_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52811_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52811_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52835_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52835_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52846_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52846_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52862_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52862_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52881_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52881_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:22:08.66 +41:31:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52892_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52892_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52894_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52894_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52902_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52902_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52915_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52915_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52924_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52924_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52932_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52932_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52935_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52935_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52973_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52973_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52983_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52983_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52992_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 52992_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53017_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53017_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53024_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53024_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53025_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53025_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:54:08.99 +43:10:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53039_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53039_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53070_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53070_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53072_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53072_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53079_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53079_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53095_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53095_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53100_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53100_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53106_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53106_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53130_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53130_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53141_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53141_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53161_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53161_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53210_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53210_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53230_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53230_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53233_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53233_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53243_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53243_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:27:52.82 +42:58:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53265_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53265_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53319_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53319_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53324_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53324_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53442_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53442_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53465_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53465_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53476_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53476_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53481_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53481_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53512_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53512_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53517_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53517_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53573_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53573_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53583_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53583_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53659_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53659_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53670_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53670_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53672_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53672_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53679_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53679_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53684_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53684_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53692_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53692_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53698_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53698_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53719_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53719_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53725_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53725_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53731_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53731_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53761_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53761_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53780_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53780_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53830_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53830_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53844_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53844_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53851_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53851_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:56:05.64 +43:25:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53866_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53866_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53871_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53871_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53882_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53882_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:54:31.71 +45:27:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53896_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53896_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53902_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53902_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53936_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53936_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53937_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53937_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:30:25.21 +47:49:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53950_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53950_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53958_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53958_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:57:24.72 +43:55:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53972_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53972_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53997_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 53997_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54033_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54033_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:40:54.15 +41:31:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54058_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54058_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54063_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54063_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54088_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54088_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54113_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54113_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54154_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54154_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54170_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54170_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54177_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
Preparing report for the candidate 54177_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54182_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54182_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54183_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54183_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54186_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
Preparing report for the candidate 54186_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54207_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54207_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54214_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54214_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54217_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54217_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54219_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54219_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54234_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54234_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54236_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
Preparing report for the candidate 54236_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54237_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54237_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54238_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54238_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54244_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54244_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54252_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54252_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54254_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54254_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54255_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54255_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54293_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54293_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54303_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54303_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54306_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54306_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54310_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54310_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54313_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54313_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54316_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54316_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54324_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
Preparing report for the candidate 54324_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54326_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
Preparing report for the candidate 54326_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54328_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54328_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54333_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 54333_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54336_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
Preparing report for the candidate 54336_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54337_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
Preparing report for the candidate 54337_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51988_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 51988_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50043_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 50043_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_23-22-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
