This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.2797 2461236.7797 13.65 20:30:32.88 -15:19:13.1
29.60929 -28.69934 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.479 Caprera 0 1 1 13.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:30:32.88 -15:19:13.1: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:30:32.88 -15:19:13.1: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 15.2797* 20 30 32.88 -15 19 13.1 13.7 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461236.7797,13.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260715.2797 13.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.2797 2461236.7797 13.93 20:04:31.88 -19:52:58.8
22.26250 -24.67698 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2379 Heiskanen -0 -0 0 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:04:31.88 -19:52:58.8: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:04:31.88 -19:52:58.8: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461236.7797,13.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260715.2797 13.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.2797 2461236.7797 14.25 20:13:18.91 -20:14:40.7
22.71938 -26.73026 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1105 Fragaria 0 1 1 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:13:18.91 -20:14:40.7: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:13:18.91 -20:14:40.7: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 15.2797* 20 13 18.91 -20 14 40.7 14.2 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461236.7797,14.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260715.2797 14.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.2797 2461236.7797 14.34 20:09:40.71 -17:29:38.5
25.20530 -24.91384 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1245 Calvinia -0 0 0 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:09:40.71 -17:29:38.5: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:09:40.71 -17:29:38.5: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 15.2797* 20 09 40.71 -17 29 38.5 14.3 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461236.7797,14.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260715.2797 14.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.2797 2461236.7797 12.48 20:09:18.37 -13:56:46.1
28.74342 -23.43792 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.125 Liberatrix 1 0 1 12.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:09:18.37 -13:56:46.1: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:09:18.37 -13:56:46.1: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 15.2797* 20 09 18.37 -13 56 46.1 12.5 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461236.7797,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260715.2797 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
First image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Last image: 2461236.77994369 15.07.2026 06:42:57.135 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.91
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7543
Objects passed selection criteria: 7539
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7069.5
Average stars matched: 6977 (98.6916 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 117376 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 13 18:59:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-151-g9f3411f7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 15 03:03:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
First image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Last image: 2461236.77994369 15.07.2026 06:42:57.135 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 91
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 65 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 61759
Objects passed selection criteria: 61632
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 58771.5
Average stars matched: 57052.2 (97.0747 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 169388 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 13 18:59:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-151-g9f3411f7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 15 03:07:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461236.77946700
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:39.038 -17:59:41.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13
Second-epoch image center 20:26:39.038 -17:59:41.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0175 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:36.589 -17:59:31.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13
Second-epoch image center 20:26:36.589 -17:59:31.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0252 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:26:39.038 -17:59:41.31
Second-epoch second image center 20:26:36.589 -17:59:31.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01011 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YVvTg4VzpB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ld61ipbw22
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yBIesuDuD6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4GS8nYcaAj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10504 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Loaded 8345 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6582 out of 6781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6781 out of 10504 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.687900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.687900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.91
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.78
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.78
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10504 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Loaded 8345 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6582 out of 6781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6781 out of 10504 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 10015 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2237 to 315.1300 deg, Dec -23.2655 to -12.6182 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2237 to 315.1300 deg, Dec -23.2655 to -12.6182 deg
Loaded 8355 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6440 out of 6657 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6657 out of 10015 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.3 pix Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
14.7 mag. Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.YVvTg4VzpB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=584, bad_region=2239, passed=10504
Got 10504 stars (including 7777 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10504 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=284 n_q2=216 n_q3=283 n_q4=186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ld61ipbw22 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=610, bad_region=2162, passed=10015
Got 10015 stars (including 7361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10015 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8038 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8038 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8038 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.415 n_q1=287 n_q2=216 n_q3=282 n_q4=184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.180
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yBIesuDuD6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=505, bad_region=1569, passed=7785
Got 7785 stars (including 5813 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7785 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.463 n_q1=289 n_q2=211 n_q3=281 n_q4=187 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.191
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4GS8nYcaAj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=510, bad_region=1547, passed=7684
Got 7684 stars (including 5731 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7684 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6256 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6256 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6256 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.480 n_q1=285 n_q2=212 n_q3=288 n_q4=181 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.207
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits sigma_overall=0.382 worst_q_ratio=1.131
ref2=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits sigma_overall=0.395 worst_q_ratio=1.180
new1=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits sigma_overall=0.476 worst_q_ratio=1.191
new2=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits sigma_overall=0.494 worst_q_ratio=1.207
reference average sigma_overall=0.3885 worst_q_ratio=1.1555
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:02:51.81 -16:03:11.3: 11.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:02:51.81 -16:03:11.3: 11.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:02:51.81 -16:03:11.3: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8490 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20352_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 20352_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20353_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 20353_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:38.58 -13:56:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:39.038 -17:59:41.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13
Second-epoch image center 20:26:39.038 -17:59:41.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0175 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:36.589 -17:59:31.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13
Second-epoch image center 20:26:36.589 -17:59:31.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0252 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:26:39.038 -17:59:41.31
Second-epoch second image center 20:26:36.589 -17:59:31.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01011 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Yx64TYT8fI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xiIHbLDkNX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gpmyXoMhe6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xbs2rjBlN7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 76668 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2135 to 315.1318 deg, Dec -23.2769 to -12.6250 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2135 to 315.1318 deg, Dec -23.2769 to -12.6250 deg
Loaded 8367 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6610 out of 7336 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7336 out of 76668 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.540350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.540350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.96
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.96
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 76668 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2135 to 315.1318 deg, Dec -23.2769 to -12.6250 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2135 to 315.1318 deg, Dec -23.2769 to -12.6250 deg
Loaded 8367 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6610 out of 7336 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7336 out of 76668 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 76028 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2142 to 315.1300 deg, Dec -23.2655 to -12.6183 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2142 to 315.1300 deg, Dec -23.2655 to -12.6183 deg
Loaded 8361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6548 out of 7349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7349 out of 76028 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 59 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.1 pix Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
14.9 mag. Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Yx64TYT8fI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=4300, bad_region=11385, passed=76653
Got 76653 stars (including 61483 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76653 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66392 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=293 n_q2=211 n_q3=283 n_q4=184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.153
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xiIHbLDkNX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=4261, bad_region=11884, passed=76012
Got 76012 stars (including 60384 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76012 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65270 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=296 n_q2=216 n_q3=274 n_q4=183 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gpmyXoMhe6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=3201, bad_region=10713, passed=64414
Got 64414 stars (including 50859 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64414 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.448 n_q1=302 n_q2=222 n_q3=267 n_q4=177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xbs2rjBlN7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=3172, bad_region=10606, passed=64251
Got 64251 stars (including 50825 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64251 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.448 n_q1=300 n_q2=223 n_q3=265 n_q4=180 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.210
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021714_TTUQ2b1x1_3845857_f0a7eLEn/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:18:56.44 -19:50:48.4: 14.51 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:26:22.33 -21:32:21.1: 13.82 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:06:07.63 -14:32:16.6: 14.55 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:07:43.79 -18:18:09.0: 14.23 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:15:05.45 -21:49:24.1: 14.04 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:25:25.99 -20:54:09.6: 14.09 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:16:02.11 -20:53:17.7: 13.93 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:41:15.45 -15:42:54.6: 14.27 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:28:40.05 -18:44:04.5: 13.75 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:39:33.48 -18:39:58.1: 14.01 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:18:56.44 -19:50:48.4: 14.33 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:56.44 -19:50:48.4: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2966 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:07:43.79 -18:18:09.0: 14.25 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:15:05.45 -21:49:24.1: 14.13 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:41:15.45 -15:42:54.6: 14.26 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:28:40.05 -18:44:04.5: 13.93 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:43.79 -18:18:09.0: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2417 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:05.45 -21:49:24.1: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9777 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:15.45 -15:42:54.6: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2722 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:26:22.33 -21:32:21.1: 14.00 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:06:07.63 -14:32:16.6: 14.55 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:40.05 -18:44:04.5: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3338 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:39:33.48 -18:39:58.1: 14.05 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:16:02.11 -20:53:17.7: 13.91 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:25:25.99 -20:54:09.6: 14.11 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:22.33 -21:32:21.1: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0078 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:07.63 -14:32:16.6: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3277 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:33.48 -18:39:58.1: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0757 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:02.11 -20:53:17.7: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0936 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:25.99 -20:54:09.6: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2536 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 19:57:48.24 -17:19:19.6: 14.08 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:40:39.47 -20:02:14.2: 13.95 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:03:58.65 -21:10:52.9: 13.68 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:40:48.95 -20:58:02.7: 13.62 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:23:46.14 -17:39:39.4: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:36:22.54 -19:53:06.4: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:24:59.37 -21:17:26.9: 13.51 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:36:44.26 -21:10:52.0: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:19:26.45 -18:53:28.2: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:08:42.03 -13:49:24.4: 13.78 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:03:58.65 -21:10:52.9: 13.77 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 19:57:48.24 -17:19:19.6: 14.10 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:40:39.47 -20:02:14.2: 13.96 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:39.47 -20:02:14.2: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1824 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:48.24 -17:19:19.6: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1817 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:58.65 -21:10:52.9: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1735 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:23:46.14 -17:39:39.4: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:24:59.37 -21:17:26.9: 13.55 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:36:22.54 -19:53:06.4: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:36:44.26 -21:10:52.0: 13.28 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:40:48.95 -20:58:02.7: 13.73 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:19:26.45 -18:53:28.2: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:46.14 -17:39:39.4: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5877 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:08:42.03 -13:49:24.4: 13.85 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:59.37 -21:17:26.9: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6888 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:22.54 -19:53:06.4: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5202 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:44.26 -21:10:52.0: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7201 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:48.95 -20:58:02.7: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9311 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:26.45 -18:53:28.2: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6182 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:42.03 -13:49:24.4: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8237 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:24:12.57 -19:44:16.9: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:18:18.88 -15:44:53.2: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:29:35.87 -20:53:22.9: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:30:32.88 -15:19:13.1: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:04:31.88 -19:52:58.8: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:03:25.38 -18:39:58.1: 13.80 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:16:20.27 -20:01:34.7: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:05:14.28 -19:30:49.1: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:18:57.19 -18:46:42.5: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:03:03.80 -19:49:04.6: 14.96 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:24:12.57 -19:44:16.9: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:18:18.88 -15:44:53.2: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:12.57 -19:44:16.9: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3585 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:18.88 -15:44:53.2: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4151 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:04:31.88 -19:52:58.8: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:16:20.27 -20:01:34.7: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:03:25.38 -18:39:58.1: 13.96 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:29:35.87 -20:53:22.9: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:30:32.88 -15:19:13.1: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:20.27 -20:01:34.7: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0184 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:05:14.28 -19:30:49.1: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:18:57.19 -18:46:42.5: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:25.38 -18:39:58.1: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9422 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:35.87 -20:53:22.9: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1763 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:03:03.80 -19:49:04.6: 14.96 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:14.28 -19:30:49.1: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5190 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:03:03.80 -19:49:04.6: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.0072 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:32:24.94 -21:58:18.3: 14.27 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:13:18.91 -20:14:40.7: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:11:42.07 -17:04:36.3: 14.49 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:00:17.54 -16:36:50.0: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:27:21.16 -19:36:47.4: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:10:25.93 -21:03:21.8: 14.49 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:32:24.94 -21:58:18.3: 14.20 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:24.94 -21:58:18.3: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1331 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:11:42.07 -17:04:36.3: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:00:17.54 -16:36:50.0: 14.56 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:13:18.91 -20:14:40.7: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:17.54 -16:36:50.0: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2564 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:42.07 -17:04:36.3: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2008 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:27:21.16 -19:36:47.4: 14.63 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:10:25.93 -21:03:21.8: 15.19 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:25.93 -21:03:21.8: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3903 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:21.16 -19:36:47.4: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3528 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:33:26.02 -22:06:39.5: 14.23 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:38:47.34 -21:06:27.9: 14.84 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:27:09.23 -20:57:41.3: 14.41 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:06:14.46 -21:31:20.0: 14.47 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:44:37.28 -21:19:25.7: 14.29 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:30:29.53 -17:23:30.2: 14.80 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:02:56.90 -14:53:40.1: 14.89 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:33:26.02 -22:06:39.5: 14.76 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:38:47.34 -21:06:27.9: 14.74 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:26.02 -22:06:39.5: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2713 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:47.34 -21:06:27.9: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2739 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:44:37.28 -21:19:25.7: 14.55 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:27:09.23 -20:57:41.3: 14.61 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:37.28 -21:19:25.7: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4369 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:30:29.53 -17:23:30.2: 14.55 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:06:14.46 -21:31:20.0: 14.46 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:09.23 -20:57:41.3: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4489 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:29.53 -17:23:30.2: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4088 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:14.46 -21:31:20.0: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3697 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:02:56.90 -14:53:40.1: 14.56 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:02:56.90 -14:53:40.1: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3011 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:36:37.37 -20:52:55.5: 14.77 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:13:34.98 -19:31:05.7: 14.68 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:24:08.19 -20:28:24.0: 14.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:10:30.83 -19:21:29.3: 14.52 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:34:29.51 -19:22:29.1: 14.63 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 19:59:37.20 -18:52:25.0: 14.62 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:23:17.18 -21:33:04.2: 14.54 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:13:34.98 -19:31:05.7: 14.44 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:36:37.37 -20:52:55.5: 14.54 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:13:34.98 -19:31:05.7: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5225 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:24:08.19 -20:28:24.0: 14.60 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:37.37 -20:52:55.5: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4228 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:08.19 -20:28:24.0: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4539 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:10:30.83 -19:21:29.3: 14.54 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:34:29.51 -19:22:29.1: 14.52 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:30.83 -19:21:29.3: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4754 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:23:17.18 -21:33:04.2: 14.32 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:29.51 -19:22:29.1: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4489 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:17.18 -21:33:04.2: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4251 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 19:59:37.20 -18:52:25.0: 14.57 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:37.20 -18:52:25.0: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5058 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:42:59.23 -21:26:37.7: 14.69 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:40:12.43 -20:55:51.6: 14.34 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:09:40.71 -17:29:38.5: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:39:53.26 -21:41:33.6: 14.76 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:44:30.95 -18:23:47.2: 14.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:32:34.12 -17:21:32.0: 14.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:44:26.43 -17:50:58.6: 14.62 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:40:12.43 -20:55:51.6: 14.39 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:12.43 -20:55:51.6: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2817 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:09:40.71 -17:29:38.5: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:44:30.95 -18:23:47.2: 14.44 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:30.95 -18:23:47.2: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5812 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:42:59.23 -21:26:37.7: 15.16 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:39:53.26 -21:41:33.6: 14.54 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:53.26 -21:41:33.6: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4052 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:59.23 -21:26:37.7: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5552 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:44:26.43 -17:50:58.6: 14.38 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:26.43 -17:50:58.6: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3632 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:32:34.12 -17:21:32.0: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:34.12 -17:21:32.0: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5622 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:44:35.05 -16:48:44.0: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:44:35.05 -16:48:44.0: 15.04 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:35.05 -16:48:44.0: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5029 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:09:18.37 -13:56:46.1: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:09:18.37 -13:56:46.1: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out92237.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out92241.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out61295.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92205.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92214.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92258.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92413.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92053_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92053_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92073_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92073_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92078_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92078_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92083_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92083_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92084_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92084_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92085_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92085_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92089_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92089_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92094_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92094_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92098_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92098_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92100_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92100_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92103_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92103_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92104_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92104_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92108_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92108_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92116_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92116_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92127_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92127_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92128_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92128_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92129_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92129_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92136_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92136_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92137_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92137_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92139_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92139_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92143_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92143_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92147_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92147_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92153_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92153_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92154_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92154_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92180_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92180_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92205_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 92205_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92214_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 92214_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92230_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92230_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92237_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92237_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:03.80 -19:49:04.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.01, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.99)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.720 6866285055576674560 300.76596918020 -19.81779056635 14.4373 13.2613 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.720#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92241_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92241_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:57.19 -18:46:42.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.639 6860628480569223552 304.73838296775 -18.77862740598 15.0164 14.6053 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.639#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92244_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92244_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92253_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92253_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92258_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 92258_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92278_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92278_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92288_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92288_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92298_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92298_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92307_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92307_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92318_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92318_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92327_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92327_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92329_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92329_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92333_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92333_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92336_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92336_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92351_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92351_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92357_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92357_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92359_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92359_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92360_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92360_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92374_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92374_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92377_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92377_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92384_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92384_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92385_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92385_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92409_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92409_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92410_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92410_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92413_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 92413_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92417_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92417_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92420_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92420_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92424_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92424_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92443_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92443_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92458_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 92458_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_01-42-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
