This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 13.3485 2461234.8485 9.59 20:53:48.30 -27:32:27.1
17.84548 -37.76639 galactic Mic Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.324 Bamberga 1 1 1 9.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:53:48.30 -27:32:27.1: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:53:48.30 -27:32:27.1: 14.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 13.3485* 20 53 48.30 -27 32 27.1 9.6 U Mic 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461234.8485,9.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260713.3485 9.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 13.3485 2461234.8485 12.66 21:00:50.03 -29:16:22.5
16.14199 -39.66970 galactic Mic Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.769 Tatjana -0 0 0 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:00:50.03 -29:16:22.5: 14.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:00:50.03 -29:16:22.5: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 13.3485* 21 00 50.03 -29 16 22.5 12.7 U Mic 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461234.8485,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260713.3485 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 13.3485 2461234.8485 12.69 21:03:18.54 -24:44:12.1
22.00909 -39.09948 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.388 Charybdis -1 1 1 12.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:03:18.54 -24:44:12.1: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:03:18.54 -24:44:12.1: 14.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 13.3485* 21 03 18.54 -24 44 12.1 12.7 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461234.8485,12.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260713.3485 12.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 13.3485 2461234.8485 13.71 21:02:43.55 -24:54:00.4
21.76026 -39.01654 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.325 Heidelberga -1 3 3 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:02:43.55 -24:54:00.4: 14.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:02:43.55 -24:54:00.4: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 13.3485* 21 02 43.55 -24 54 00.4 13.7 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461234.8485,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260713.3485 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.82423715 17.06.2026 07:46:44.090 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
First image: 2461208.82423715 17.06.2026 07:46:44.090 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Last image: 2461234.84879655 13.07.2026 08:22:06.022 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4119
Objects passed selection criteria: 4116
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3940
Average stars matched: 3735.25 (94.8033 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114084 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jul 11 21:08:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-146-gb95cfcf3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 13 04:56:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.82423715 17.06.2026 07:46:44.090 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
First image: 2461208.82423715 17.06.2026 07:46:44.090 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Last image: 2461234.84879655 13.07.2026 08:22:06.022 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 166
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.99
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 42 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 29462
Objects passed selection criteria: 29406
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 28108
Average stars matched: 26607.5 (94.6617 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 138588 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jul 11 21:08:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-146-gb95cfcf3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 13 05:01:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461234.84828705
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:06:59.939 -25:59:26.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:13.335 -26:00:00.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:06:59.939 -25:59:26.19
Second-epoch image center 21:07:13.335 -26:00:00.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0511 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:15.762 -25:59:25.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:06:59.939 -25:59:26.19
Second-epoch image center 21:07:15.762 -25:59:25.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0593 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:07:13.335 -26:00:00.67
Second-epoch second image center 21:07:15.762 -25:59:25.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01330 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Dl17KnfiI1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ozso9HLAUy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nHBpKYbLlz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5DUD8lSRWC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 4590 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7573 to 325.7549 deg, Dec -31.2624 to -20.5568 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7573 to 325.7549 deg, Dec -31.2624 to -20.5568 deg
Loaded 7064 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3816 out of 3873 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3873 out of 4590 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.445150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.445150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.12
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.12
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 4590 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7573 to 325.7549 deg, Dec -31.2624 to -20.5568 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7573 to 325.7549 deg, Dec -31.2624 to -20.5568 deg
Loaded 7064 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3816 out of 3873 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3873 out of 4590 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 4645 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7571 to 325.7547 deg, Dec -31.2444 to -20.5156 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7571 to 325.7547 deg, Dec -31.2444 to -20.5156 deg
Loaded 7088 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3849 out of 3914 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3914 out of 4645 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
2.3 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
14.1 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Dl17KnfiI1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=305, bad_region=905, passed=4590
Got 4590 stars (including 3428 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4590 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.358 n_q1=326 n_q2=169 n_q3=313 n_q4=169 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ozso9HLAUy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=311, bad_region=919, passed=4645
Got 4645 stars (including 3467 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4645 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.361 n_q1=319 n_q2=167 n_q3=320 n_q4=171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nHBpKYbLlz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=362, bad_region=982, passed=5186
Got 5186 stars (including 3928 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5186 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.601 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=328 n_q2=169 n_q3=309 n_q4=162 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.286
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5DUD8lSRWC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=349, bad_region=1019, passed=5244
Got 5244 stars (including 3960 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5244 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.462 n_q1=327 n_q2=168 n_q3=312 n_q4=163 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.275
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.159
ref2=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.232
new1=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits sigma_overall=0.467 worst_q_ratio=1.286
new2=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits sigma_overall=0.447 worst_q_ratio=1.275
reference average sigma_overall=0.3735 worst_q_ratio=1.1955
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:40:46.06 -27:35:30.9: 11.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:00:15.20 -27:21:42.1: 11.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:01:25.82 -23:03:18.5: 11.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:53:48.30 -27:32:27.1: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:40:46.06 -27:35:30.9: 11.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:00:15.20 -27:21:42.1: 11.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:46.06 -27:35:30.9: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.1867 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:15.20 -27:21:42.1: ref_mag=11.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2199 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:01:25.82 -23:03:18.5: 11.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:25.82 -23:03:18.5: ref_mag=11.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2334 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:53:48.30 -27:32:27.1: 14.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20225.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20225_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
Preparing report for the candidate 20225_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20234_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 20234_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20235_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 20235_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20236_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 20236_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00992_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 00992_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:03.08 -28:47:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 15s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:53:48.30 -27:32:27.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:06:59.939 -25:59:26.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:13.335 -26:00:00.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:06:59.939 -25:59:26.19
Second-epoch image center 21:07:13.335 -26:00:00.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0511 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:15.762 -25:59:25.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:06:59.939 -25:59:26.19
Second-epoch image center 21:07:15.762 -25:59:25.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0593 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:07:13.335 -26:00:00.67
Second-epoch second image center 21:07:15.762 -25:59:25.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01330 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9AdTIFKT3T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CL4IEJwMVQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DJaN7Ih6ez
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lGFGDLHxfj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32517 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7104 to 325.8372 deg, Dec -31.2627 to -20.5198 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7104 to 325.8372 deg, Dec -31.2627 to -20.5198 deg
Loaded 7143 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5715 out of 6003 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6003 out of 32517 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.281900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.281900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.99
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32517 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7104 to 325.8372 deg, Dec -31.2627 to -20.5198 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7104 to 325.8372 deg, Dec -31.2627 to -20.5198 deg
Loaded 7143 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5715 out of 6003 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6003 out of 32517 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 32635 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7102 to 325.8938 deg, Dec -31.2487 to -20.4986 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7102 to 325.8938 deg, Dec -31.2487 to -20.4986 deg
Loaded 7165 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5705 out of 6017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6017 out of 32635 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 67 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
2.2 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
14.3 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9AdTIFKT3T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1030, bad_region=4439, passed=32510
Got 32510 stars (including 27141 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32510 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28559 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=327 n_q2=166 n_q3=304 n_q4=175 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CL4IEJwMVQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1093, bad_region=4442, passed=32628
Got 32628 stars (including 27234 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32628 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.345 n_q1=327 n_q2=165 n_q3=303 n_q4=177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.255
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DJaN7Ih6ez (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1443, bad_region=6781, passed=35384
Got 35384 stars (including 27372 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35384 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29352 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29350 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29350 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.408 n_q1=334 n_q2=192 n_q3=281 n_q4=163 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.327
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lGFGDLHxfj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1451, bad_region=6733, passed=35053
Got 35053 stars (including 27086 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35053 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29090 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29091 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29091 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.557 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.451 n_q1=331 n_q2=191 n_q3=280 n_q4=168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-21-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_040713_TTUQ2b1x1_2737007_HQOP35uf/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:26:19.99 -25:38:58.0: 12.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:07:48.72 -29:33:05.0: 12.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:16:46.72 -28:28:53.1: 13.86 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:52:31.52 -22:21:07.9: 12.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:02:51.32 -28:55:56.2: 12.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:52:10.86 -28:44:11.9: 12.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:22:11.64 -29:30:44.0: 13.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:25:13.15 -28:33:30.8: 13.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:47:47.02 -24:32:50.6: 13.42 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:16:46.72 -28:28:53.1: 13.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:07:48.72 -29:33:05.0: 12.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:16:46.72 -28:28:53.1: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7269 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:26:19.99 -25:38:58.0: 12.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:52:31.52 -22:21:07.9: 12.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:07:48.72 -29:33:05.0: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5672 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:52:10.86 -28:44:11.9: 12.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:19.99 -25:38:58.0: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5134 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:31.52 -22:21:07.9: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0859 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:10.86 -28:44:11.9: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2528 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:02:51.32 -28:55:56.2: 12.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:51.32 -28:55:56.2: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1619 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:22:11.64 -29:30:44.0: 13.74 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:11.64 -29:30:44.0: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7836 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:00:50.03 -29:16:22.5: 14.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:25:13.15 -28:33:30.8: 13.60 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:25:13.15 -28:33:30.8: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4979 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:47:47.02 -24:32:50.6: 13.44 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:47.02 -24:32:50.6: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7345 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:00:50.03 -29:16:22.5: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:03:18.54 -24:44:12.1: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:26:21.68 -29:39:48.5: 13.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:27:13.33 -28:55:29.4: 13.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:16:04.05 -29:30:04.7: 13.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:14:11.30 -29:30:31.0: 13.41 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:25:52.95 -30:10:56.5: 13.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:24:33.23 -29:51:55.5: 13.96 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:03:18.54 -24:44:12.1: 14.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:22:56.13 -29:16:07.8: 14.04 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:23:08.23 -29:35:19.5: 14.14 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:27:13.33 -28:55:29.4: 13.41 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:13.33 -28:55:29.4: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5803 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:26:21.68 -29:39:48.5: 13.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:21.68 -29:39:48.5: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4690 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:16:04.05 -29:30:04.7: 13.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:14:11.30 -29:30:31.0: 13.51 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:16:04.05 -29:30:04.7: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4531 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:22:56.13 -29:16:07.8: 13.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:14:11.30 -29:30:31.0: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4602 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:24:33.23 -29:51:55.5: 14.01 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:25:52.95 -30:10:56.5: 13.53 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:56.13 -29:16:07.8: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5370 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:24:33.23 -29:51:55.5: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6465 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:25:52.95 -30:10:56.5: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5450 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:23:08.23 -29:35:19.5: 14.12 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:23:08.23 -29:35:19.5: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6374 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:58:45.76 -28:13:48.7: 13.89 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:27:28.85 -29:47:54.9: 14.37 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:58:45.76 -28:13:48.7: 13.62 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:21:24.80 -29:38:09.4: 13.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:26:47.41 -29:41:55.4: 13.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:45.76 -28:13:48.7: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6238 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:21:23.22 -27:40:52.3: 14.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:27:28.85 -29:47:54.9: 13.53 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:28.85 -29:47:54.9: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6422 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:20:52.56 -29:34:13.5: 14.52 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:54:28.71 -30:07:57.0: 13.99 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:26:47.41 -29:41:55.4: 14.03 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:21:23.22 -27:40:52.3: 14.21 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:47.41 -29:41:55.4: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5891 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:21:24.80 -29:38:09.4: 13.99 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:21:23.22 -27:40:52.3: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6964 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:21:24.80 -29:38:09.4: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6048 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:36:47.77 -25:45:13.4: 13.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:54:28.71 -30:07:57.0: 14.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:28.71 -30:07:57.0: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6912 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:20:52.56 -29:34:13.5: 13.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:20:52.56 -29:34:13.5: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.5086 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:36:47.77 -25:45:13.4: 13.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:47.77 -25:45:13.4: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5172 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:15:23.24 -29:28:46.0: 13.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:18:20.39 -29:30:06.8: 13.88 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:26:00.81 -29:28:58.2: 13.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:26:16.81 -29:31:06.7: 13.91 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:15:23.24 -29:28:46.0: 13.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:15:23.24 -29:28:46.0: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6756 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:18:20.39 -29:30:06.8: 13.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:18:20.39 -29:30:06.8: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5382 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:47:25.26 -30:06:18.4: 14.22 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:52:54.54 -28:52:12.8: 14.32 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:26:00.81 -29:28:58.2: 13.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:26:16.81 -29:31:06.7: 13.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:23:35.39 -29:57:55.9: 14.10 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:00.81 -29:28:58.2: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7174 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:16.81 -29:31:06.7: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6368 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:23:22.64 -29:31:54.7: 14.09 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:23:35.39 -29:57:55.9: 14.39 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:52:54.54 -28:52:12.8: 14.19 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:23:35.39 -29:57:55.9: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.8545 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:54.54 -28:52:12.8: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.7179 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:47:25.26 -30:06:18.4: 13.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:25.26 -30:06:18.4: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7614 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:23:22.64 -29:31:54.7: 13.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:23:22.64 -29:31:54.7: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7221 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:25:41.17 -29:04:37.4: 14.47 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:21:19.44 -30:00:38.8: 13.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:21:21.33 -30:08:13.8: 14.02 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:25:50.35 -28:18:37.2: 13.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:25:41.17 -29:04:37.4: 14.22 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:25:41.17 -29:04:37.4: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.7973 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:55:46.11 -29:55:38.5: 14.16 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:21:20.47 -28:53:16.8: 14.15 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:17:00.60 -30:13:56.3: 14.17 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:21:21.33 -30:08:13.8: 14.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:21:21.33 -30:08:13.8: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6796 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:55:46.11 -29:55:38.5: 13.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:46.11 -29:55:38.5: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7404 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:21:19.44 -30:00:38.8: 14.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:25:50.35 -28:18:37.2: 14.44 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:21:19.44 -30:00:38.8: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.8993 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:25:50.35 -28:18:37.2: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7599 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:38:46.15 -28:59:34.2: 14.17 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:17:00.60 -30:13:56.3: 14.09 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:21:20.47 -28:53:16.8: 13.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:17:00.60 -30:13:56.3: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.9051 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:21:20.47 -28:53:16.8: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7422 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:38:46.15 -28:59:34.2: 14.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:46.15 -28:59:34.2: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6547 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:19:27.53 -29:09:16.1: 13.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:04:42.49 -30:09:08.3: 13.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:44:19.64 -29:53:03.3: 14.15 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:22:22.11 -28:13:31.4: 14.50 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:19:27.53 -29:09:16.1: 14.28 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:19:27.53 -29:09:16.1: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8009 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:15:18.57 -28:05:10.1: 13.97 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:04:42.49 -30:09:08.3: 14.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:42.49 -30:09:08.3: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7835 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:36:25.87 -29:58:42.8: 13.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:12:33.02 -30:05:32.1: 14.07 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:15:18.57 -28:05:10.1: 13.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:22:22.11 -28:13:31.4: 13.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:15:18.57 -28:05:10.1: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7165 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:22.11 -28:13:31.4: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8016 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:36:25.87 -29:58:42.8: 13.98 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:44:19.64 -29:53:03.3: 13.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:25.87 -29:58:42.8: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8717 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:19.64 -29:53:03.3: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8601 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:13:52.32 -30:10:31.1: 14.24 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:12:33.02 -30:05:32.1: 14.26 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:12:33.02 -30:05:32.1: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.8125 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:18:06.25 -28:59:44.6: 14.19 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:13:52.32 -30:10:31.1: 13.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:13:52.32 -30:10:31.1: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.8477 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:18:05.97 -25:48:47.3: 13.94 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:18:06.25 -28:59:44.6: 13.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:18:06.25 -28:59:44.6: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.9133 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:25:49.91 -29:20:40.2: 14.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:55:02.82 -30:04:22.6: 13.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:18:05.97 -25:48:47.3: 14.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:18:05.97 -25:48:47.3: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7763 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:17:26.35 -28:49:23.6: 14.21 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:25:53.56 -29:09:49.3: 14.06 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:45:03.98 -28:07:13.6: 13.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:25:49.91 -29:20:40.2: 14.05 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:55:02.82 -30:04:22.6: 14.09 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:25:49.91 -29:20:40.2: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8625 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:25:08.11 -27:50:54.9: 14.32 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:02.82 -30:04:22.6: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9491 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:17:26.35 -28:49:23.6: 14.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:17:26.35 -28:49:23.6: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.9451 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:25:53.56 -29:09:49.3: 14.08 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:25:53.56 -29:09:49.3: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.9084 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:25:08.11 -27:50:54.9: 14.26 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:45:03.98 -28:07:13.6: 13.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:25:08.11 -27:50:54.9: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.7693 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:03.98 -28:07:13.6: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8152 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:35:54.83 -29:51:46.3: 13.91 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:35:54.83 -29:51:46.3: 14.33 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:22:39.79 -23:29:35.7: 13.95 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:54.83 -29:51:46.3: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.8066 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:02:43.55 -24:54:00.4: 14.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:22:39.79 -23:29:35.7: 14.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:39.79 -23:29:35.7: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7459 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:02:43.55 -24:54:00.4: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52378.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52386.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52744.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52308_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52308_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52316_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52316_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52317_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52317_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52324_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52324_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52329_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52329_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52330_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52330_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52332_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52332_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52336_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52336_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52337_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52337_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52342_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52342_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:53:48.29 -27:32:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52378_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
Preparing report for the candidate 52378_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52379_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52379_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:14:45.45 -27:58:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52386_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
Preparing report for the candidate 52386_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52421_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52421_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52423_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52423_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52430_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52430_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52438_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52438_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52441_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52441_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52445_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52445_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52455_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52455_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52457_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52457_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52458_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52458_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52459_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52459_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52460_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52460_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52464_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52464_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52471_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52471_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52474_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52474_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52475_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52475_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52476_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52476_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52478_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52478_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52492_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52492_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52494_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52494_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52495_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52495_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52508_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52508_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52510_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52510_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52513_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52513_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52519_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52519_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52523_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52523_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52527_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52527_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52530_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52530_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52531_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52531_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52538_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52538_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52539_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52539_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52540_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52540_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52544_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52544_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52545_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52545_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52549_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52549_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52550_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52550_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52551_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52551_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52557_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52557_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52566_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52566_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52572_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52572_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52602_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52602_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52604_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52604_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52605_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52605_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52609_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52609_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52614_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52614_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52615_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52615_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52624_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52624_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52627_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52627_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52628_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52628_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52634_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52634_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52648_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52648_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52706_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52706_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52744_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
Preparing report for the candidate 52744_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05198_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 05198_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:03.10 -28:47:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08641_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 08641_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_03-22-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks