Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J113014.67+615416.5,2461234.8286,12.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J113014.67+615416.5 20260713.3286 12.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-04-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-04-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-04-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 105666 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 105666 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits_preview.png'
UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits

renamed 'UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits_preview.png'
UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 482.7200
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 528.8252
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1146.5454
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 393.5570
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1146.0962
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 392.7326
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.37518
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 19.9799995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 20.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-13T02:52:38.5156498' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-13T07:52:38.5156498' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61234.328223553 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-13T07:52:48.4190539' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61234.328338183 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 180.000281117483 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 61.9997817688194 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.6527777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 337.135 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.89606825857037 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20438 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20438 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.9799995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.9799995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 18.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 92.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 906.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 20.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 270.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.200256 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/d_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits :)
Spent 0.801301 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/d_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 33794.829350
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21727.0, right_median=27156.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 20.0 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 20.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-13T02:53:18.3794860' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-13T07:53:18.3794860' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61234.3286849423 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-13T07:53:28.2798510' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61234.3287995253 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 180.000281150646 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 61.9997817926945 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.5988888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 337.194444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.90969507800505 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20438 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20438 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.0 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.0 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 18.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 92.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 906.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 20.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 270.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.200256 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/d_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits :)
Spent 0.817628 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/d_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 33794.829350
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21727.0, right_median=27156.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits

fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461234.82833929
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits'
wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.732 +62:00:23.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:02.046 +61:59:51.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.732 +62:00:23.71
Second-epoch image center 12:00:02.046 +61:59:51.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0095 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:01.045 +62:00:13.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.732 +62:00:23.71
Second-epoch image center 12:00:01.045 +62:00:13.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0060 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:02.046 +61:59:51.77
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:01.045 +62:00:13.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00625 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gmW7raU4jO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.u3hXRJJZXj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YIswZt4aUZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y3SzSSWzuj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9761 to 198.4298 deg, Dec +55.2649 to +67.4535 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9761 to 198.4298 deg, Dec 55.2649 to 67.4535 deg
Loaded 6571 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3978 out of 4192 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4192 out of 7332 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.890450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.890450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.49
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9761 to 198.4298 deg, Dec +55.2649 to +67.4535 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9761 to 198.4298 deg, Dec 55.2649 to 67.4535 deg
Loaded 6571 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3978 out of 4192 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4192 out of 7332 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7282 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9754 to 198.4299 deg, Dec +55.3321 to +67.4949 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9754 to 198.4299 deg, Dec 55.3321 to 67.4949 deg
Loaded 6542 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3981 out of 4179 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4179 out of 7282 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
2.2 pix UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
2.2 pix wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
2.2 pix wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
15.4 mag. UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
14.1 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
14.0 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.gmW7raU4jO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=506, bad_region=1672, passed=7332
Got 7332 stars (including 5274 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=287 n_q2=162 n_q3=316 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.u3hXRJJZXj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=494, bad_region=1659, passed=7282
Got 7282 stars (including 5242 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7282 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=290 n_q2=162 n_q3=314 n_q4=212 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YIswZt4aUZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=228, bad_region=683, passed=3651
Got 3651 stars (including 2792 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3651 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.627 n_q1=347 n_q2=190 n_q3=287 n_q4=143 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.y3SzSSWzuj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=210, bad_region=655, passed=3650
Got 3650 stars (including 2817 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3650 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.555 n_q1=349 n_q2=183 n_q3=290 n_q4=147 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits sigma_overall=0.388 worst_q_ratio=1.152
ref2=UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits sigma_overall=0.419 worst_q_ratio=1.144
new1=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits sigma_overall=0.506 worst_q_ratio=1.238
new2=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits sigma_overall=0.516 worst_q_ratio=1.083
reference average sigma_overall=0.4035 worst_q_ratio=1.148
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278_astrometric_residuals.png (979 matched stars from wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20914_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 20914_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 11.42 | 11:45:01.47 +64:47:36.2 | 5703 1450 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
**** FOUND 11:45:01.47 +64:47:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01679_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 01679_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 7.61 | 12:36:23.18 +59:29:14.0 | 2041 4615 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
**** FOUND 12:36:23.21 +59:29:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.732 +62:00:23.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:02.046 +61:59:51.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.732 +62:00:23.71
Second-epoch image center 12:00:02.046 +61:59:51.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0095 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:01.045 +62:00:13.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.732 +62:00:23.71
Second-epoch image center 12:00:01.045 +62:00:13.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0060 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:02.046 +61:59:51.77
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:01.045 +62:00:13.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00625 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YZCPWjWy5I
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6aBkzniL1Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y4gNsdtnY0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jSdkisFedq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 37333 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9761 to 198.6760 deg, Dec +55.2262 to +67.4863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9761 to 198.6760 deg, Dec 55.2262 to 67.4863 deg
Loaded 6640 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3750 out of 4197 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4197 out of 37333 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.782250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.782250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 37333 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9761 to 198.6760 deg, Dec +55.2262 to +67.4863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9761 to 198.6760 deg, Dec 55.2262 to 67.4863 deg
Loaded 6640 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3750 out of 4197 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4197 out of 37333 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 37494 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9755 to 198.6753 deg, Dec +55.2659 to +67.4949 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9755 to 198.6753 deg, Dec 55.2659 to 67.4949 deg
Loaded 6626 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3751 out of 4193 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4193 out of 37494 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 65 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
2.1 pix UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
14.4 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
14.4 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.YZCPWjWy5I (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1765, bad_region=7377, passed=37316
Got 37316 stars (including 28488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37316 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30728 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=275 n_q2=165 n_q3=324 n_q4=213 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.239
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6aBkzniL1Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1739, bad_region=7420, passed=37478
Got 37478 stars (including 28617 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37478 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.344 n_q1=276 n_q2=167 n_q3=322 n_q4=212 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.y4gNsdtnY0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=855, bad_region=2658, passed=20180
Got 20180 stars (including 16948 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20180 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17700 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17700 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17700 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.550 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.628 n_q1=349 n_q2=182 n_q3=297 n_q4=140 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jSdkisFedq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=733, bad_region=2603, passed=19963
Got 19963 stars (including 16821 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19963 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.550 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.565 n_q1=347 n_q2=178 n_q3=302 n_q4=142 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-52-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:30:14.79 +61:54:16.8: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:30:14.79 +61:54:16.8: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 11:30:14.79 +61:54:16.8: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7224 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out19459.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52509_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 52509_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 10.71 | 11:24:57.00 +65:17:29.8 | 6939 0981 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52576_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 52576_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 10.85 | 11:23:39.04 +64:19:23.9 | 7119 1546 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52639_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 52639_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 11.12 | 11:58:15.21 +59:20:01.0 | 4971 4801 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52834_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 52834_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 11.49 | 11:45:01.48 +64:47:36.0 | 5703 1450 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
**** FOUND 11:45:01.49 +64:47:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53421_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 53421_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 12.40 | 12:36:31.62 +59:59:58.8 | 2065 4304 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53506_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 53506_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 11.99 | 11:33:44.09 +58:06:37.3 | 6950 5374 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53700_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 53700_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 12.93 | 12:31:51.43 +65:53:58.1 | 2750 0776 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54128_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 54128_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 12.82 | 12:20:47.55 +62:26:07.9 | 3330 2923 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54264_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 54264_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 12.71 | 11:51:40.18 +59:32:00.7 | 5470 4654 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54335_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 54335_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.08 | 12:36:35.87 +63:47:50.9 | 2316 2015 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54363_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 54363_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 12.67 | 11:24:22.81 +64:58:08.6 | 7007 1168 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54368_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 54368_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.11 | 12:08:26.44 +64:47:15.2 | 4197 1522 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54412_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 54412_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.27 | 12:35:24.90 +61:21:56.5 | 2238 3489 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54423_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 54423_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 12.70 | 11:29:25.02 +62:05:37.6 | 6941 2942 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54514_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 54514_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 12.73 | 11:53:18.04 +58:58:05.8 | 5364 5003 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54537_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 54537_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.35 | 12:25:30.95 +66:05:00.8 | 3150 0697 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54606_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 54606_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.13 | 12:32:14.95 +60:45:57.1 | 2433 3873 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54620_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 54620_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 12.75 | 11:40:23.16 +57:57:11.6 | 6431 5532 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
**** FOUND 11:40:23.08 +57:57:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54868_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 54868_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 12.76 | 11:30:39.74 +65:37:23.3 | 6552 0840 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54876_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 54876_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.15 | 12:12:14.23 +58:30:38.5 | 3885 5314 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54991_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 54991_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.09 | 11:39:55.99 +60:50:38.7 | 6282 3789 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55067_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 55067_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.27 | 12:33:16.73 +58:50:44.6 | 2241 5026 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55086_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 55086_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.44 | 12:22:24.10 +65:44:48.8 | 3330 0914 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55105_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 55105_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.15 | 12:04:56.29 +58:02:58.3 | 4464 5593 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55150_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 55150_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.18 | 11:39:53.55 +62:07:36.9 | 6203 3019 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55178_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 55178_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.17 | 11:37:10.06 +62:05:17.4 | 6397 3020 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55306_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 55306_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.21 | 12:13:05.67 +62:35:51.5 | 3870 2843 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55421_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 55421_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.64 | 12:02:00.52 +59:20:21.4 | 4682 4807 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55520_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 55520_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.11 | 11:27:24.37 +59:09:34.8 | 7355 4673 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55567_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 55567_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.75 | 12:18:38.53 +63:15:54.3 | 3501 2429 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
**** FOUND 12:18:38.51 +63:15:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55599_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 55599_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.45 | 12:34:02.71 +58:00:06.7 | 2128 5532 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55603_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 55603_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.82 | 12:35:48.92 +63:47:37.4 | 2368 2023 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55643_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 55643_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.13 | 12:15:02.46 +57:52:08.1 | 3652 5700 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55648_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 55648_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.36 | 11:58:20.96 +61:26:09.9 | 4919 3533 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
**** FOUND 11:58:21.03 +61:26:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55655_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 55655_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.79 | 12:37:17.16 +59:11:29.0 | 1951 4786 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55693_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 55693_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.11 | 11:35:05.25 +59:29:45.4 | 6738 4555 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55810_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 55810_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.67 | 12:25:31.84 +65:51:46.4 | 3140 0831 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55819_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 55819_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.22 | 12:09:50.24 +58:24:09.8 | 4074 5381 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56009_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 56009_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.57 | 11:59:58.82 +59:05:42.0 | 4842 4950 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
**** FOUND 11:59:58.74 +59:05:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56011_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 56011_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.50 | 11:36:53.30 +61:15:05.3 | 6476 3519 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56056_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 56056_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.57 | 12:14:48.94 +61:29:42.1 | 3732 3506 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56091_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 56091_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.64 | 11:40:54.50 +65:20:18.4 | 5933 1095 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56094_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 56094_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.91 | 12:32:51.10 +59:09:17.2 | 2293 4842 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56148_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 56148_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 14.24 | 12:38:45.81 +63:55:00.0 | 2180 1926 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56150_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 56150_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.84 | 12:26:35.78 +61:24:38.6 | 2879 3517 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56406_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 56406_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.60 | 11:20:18.14 +63:04:21.1 | 7473 2251 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56495_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 56495_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.61 | 11:45:02.45 +64:54:00.1 | 5696 1386 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56518_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 56518_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.93 | 12:32:17.44 +62:25:15.2 | 2525 2875 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56545_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 56545_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 14.29 | 12:38:13.54 +65:18:20.7 | 2314 1092 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56573_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 56573_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 14.00 | 12:26:30.40 +64:59:53.1 | 3042 1351 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56838_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 56838_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 14.00 | 11:35:39.04 +62:38:16.9 | 6463 2677 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
**** FOUND 11:35:38.93 +62:38:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56880_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 56880_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 14.08 | 11:46:36.22 +58:58:28.1 | 5884 4962 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56954_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 56954_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.87 | 12:23:53.37 +64:57:33.2 | 3208 1386 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57047_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 57047_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 14.07 | 11:42:13.30 +64:33:43.2 | 5896 1572 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57091_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 57091_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 14.42 | 12:12:50.83 +64:05:26.0 | 3905 1941 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57149_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 57149_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.60 | 11:39:45.54 +60:42:00.4 | 6304 3874 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57267_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 57267_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 14.37 | 12:25:26.12 +58:16:53.4 | 2832 5415 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57272_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 57272_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.96 | 11:43:54.50 +57:58:47.9 | 6148 5544 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57356_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 57356_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 13.76 | 11:16:46.34 +65:28:52.4 | 7429 0770 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57360_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 57360_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 14.50 | 12:13:41.44 +66:02:17.0 | 3876 0759 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57380_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 57380_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 14.55 | 12:23:45.54 +63:37:48.8 | 3167 2190 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57432_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 57432_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 14.30 | 12:00:10.98 +62:10:04.9 | 4774 3096 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57506_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 57506_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 14.30 | 12:02:38.20 +62:26:55.6 | 4598 2931 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07651_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 07651_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 07 13.32880 | 2461234.82880 | 7.73 | 12:36:23.19 +59:29:14.0 | 2041 4615 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_031610_TTUQ2b1x1_951655_yhos8g2f/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits |
**** FOUND 12:36:23.21 +59:29:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19459_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 19459_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-53-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0139
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 22s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:30:14.79 +61:54:16.8
########### Completed UMa-04-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
11:30:14.79 +61:54:16.8
###################################################################################
11:30:14.79 +61:54:16.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
11:30:14.79 +61:54:16.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
11:30:14.79 +61:54:16.8 -- a known variable star
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
11:30:14.79 +61:54:16.8
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461234.82833929 -observatory V36
07:24:13.46 +17:06:56.6 Mercury (5.6mag)
10:24:01.60 +11:21:39.5 Venus (-4.1mag)
04:33:00.04 +21:46:42.2 Mars (1.3mag)
08:19:23.02 +20:02:52.6 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:08.95 +03:21:28.0 Saturn (0.7mag)
04:07:47.71 +20:46:34.1 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:17:00.17 +00:20:22.4 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:30:38.40 -23:19:19.3 Pluto (14.4mag)
06:25:59.06 +26:42:40.6 Moon (-8.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jul 13 04:05 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461234.82833929:
08:19:19.01 +20:03:09.1 Io (6.1mag)
08:19:16.65 +20:03:18.1 Europa (6.3mag)
08:19:13.01 +20:03:28.2 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:19:26.73 +20:02:34.6 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:17:46.39 +19:48:18.5 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:19:27.52 +20:02:36.0 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:17:07.17 +19:52:06.8 Elara (17.6mag)
08:23:00.68 +19:55:27.1 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:24:10.63 +20:08:23.5 Carme (19.0mag)
00:56:11.24 +03:20:57.1 Titan (8.5mag)
00:56:11.66 +03:21:34.4 Rhea (9.8mag)
00:55:35.32 +03:20:03.6 Iapetus (11.2mag)
00:56:05.21 +03:21:57.7 Hyperion (14.5mag)
00:56:05.70 +03:18:15.7 Phoebe (16.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 13 04:05 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461234.82833929:
17:50:12.74 -32:20:04.2 JWST
17:03:54.95 +42:48:40.9 Chandra
09:48:50.67 -55:26:11.9 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 13 04:05 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461234.82833929 -observatory V36
02:40:29.08 +14:46:48.2 17.9mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:15:40.62 -34:26:30.6 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:28:39.20 -68:11:18.9 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:01:50.23 +32:29:52.0 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
02:04:11.31 +13:47:32.4 15.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:57:43.30 +32:16:34.5 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:15:47.40 +26:53:57.1 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:58:06.83 +29:38:51.3 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:11:39.60 +05:03:17.2 17.8mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:05:25.07 +21:10:34.9 18.0mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:11:18.81 -11:27:26.0 17.7mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:45:36.56 +67:35:39.0 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
16:25:06.45 -10:23:20.1 13.9mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:05:49.90 +65:52:10.7 17.9mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:36:42.21 +30:09:15.3 14.7mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:14:55.07 +15:24:12.6 17.6mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:37:29.96 +39:57:47.0 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:44:27.53 +46:26:44.8 17.8mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
04:52:26.59 -13:39:49.5 15.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:37:01.83 +28:34:24.2 18.0mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:16:24.52 -13:09:24.8 16.6mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:59:33.77 +22:18:27.8 17.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:45:38.13 +03:48:30.9 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:43:39.69 +79:09:53.5 17.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:49:23.44 +45:22:03.4 16.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:27:25.51 +05:03:56.0 17.0mag A/2026 E1
21:23:41.54 -16:09:36.2 7.2mag 10P/Tempel
11:14:51.74 -02:00:57.6 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:04:27.35 +29:52:32.8 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
10:14:17.61 +13:03:42.2 17.0mag 63P/Wild
00:49:37.20 -05:03:45.4 15.5mag 65P/Gunn
04:34:35.83 +20:19:40.4 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
02:27:07.06 +11:00:58.5 16.3mag 88P/Howell
06:44:22.46 +30:21:06.8 15.7mag 93P/Lovas
04:30:40.85 +31:14:11.5 16.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
08:15:58.29 +30:22:03.6 15.2mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:53:41.53 -00:01:24.3 16.8mag 124P/Mrkos
04:56:30.52 +20:53:45.3 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
05:41:51.97 +19:41:15.3 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
00:02:19.31 +03:02:53.8 17.9mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
07:24:27.17 +16:22:21.5 15.9mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:18:04.55 -20:51:39.6 15.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
05:43:47.61 +34:34:33.9 15.4mag 162P/SidingSpring
18:56:25.80 +16:57:45.1 14.5mag 169P/NEAT
01:48:06.97 +07:55:37.3 17.7mag 220P/McNaught
16:35:37.54 -08:30:24.7 17.1mag 235P/LINEAR
08:51:33.19 +33:01:21.7 17.9mag 240P/NEAT
20:40:49.67 -50:12:36.7 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
02:07:39.15 +13:29:15.8 15.6mag 260P/McNaught
05:46:16.04 +37:04:25.9 17.4mag 295P/LINEAR
15:06:29.44 +05:47:23.2 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski
08:37:16.79 +19:33:19.0 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:56:26.29 +38:58:06.7 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.6K Jul 13 04:05 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.47 -16:06:07.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.24 16.32
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 2026-07-5.01 16.82
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 2026-07-5.01 16.82
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 13 04:05 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 13 04:05 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
16:02:58.172 +34:00:56.48 AT 2026toq 2026-06-06.46 20.7
10:52:54.608 -04:49:59.71 AT 2026top 2026-02-18.47 21.11
11:34:57.823 +56:41:36.57 AT 2026too 2026-01-14.61 21.13
18:34:53.747 +37:29:26.70 AT 2026ton 2026-05-20.52 21.07
08:35:53.580 +06:18:21.24 AT 2026tom 2026-03-09.32 21.34
12:31:07.347 -01:35:38.60 AT 2026tol 2026-04-22.35 21.29
15:40:49.500 +03:40:01.11 AT 2026tok 2026-07-09.29 19.19
13:28:58.224 -31:39:58.70 AT 2026toj 2026-01-27.63 20.99
16:19:43.736 +12:53:16.12 AT 2026toi 2026-06-19.41 20.78
12:16:00.811 +13:52:30.28 AT 2026toh 2026-06-05.33 21.31
08:05:33.164 +19:53:59.86 AT 2026tog 2026-05-05.27 21.02
22:22:27.296 -01:16:48.01 AT 2026tof 2026-06-20.59 21.53
18:21:21.782 +34:34:12.08 AT 2026toe 2026-06-06.57 20.8
09:23:56.056 +15:48:10.98 AT 2026tod 2026-03-09.25 20.93
14:30:53.211 +02:37:48.55 AT 2026toc 2026-02-24.60 21.68
18:53:53.654 +37:31:27.95 AT 2026tob 2026-06-06.57 20.33
14:02:45.983 +27:31:29.38 AT 2026toa 2026-01-13.59 21.55
11:45:46.289 -15:58:14.20 AT 2026tnz 2026-04-19.34 21.32
17:01:06.389 +36:02:56.61 AT 2026tny 2026-06-22.29 20.16
14:21:15.460 +00:01:06.82 AT 2026tnx 2026-05-17.42 21.17
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jul 13 04:05 tns_transients_list.txt