This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.4497 2461233.9497 10.20 23:05:31.85 -14:13:30.0
55.19813 -62.16114 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.9 Metis 0 0 0 10.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:05:31.85 -14:13:30.0: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:05:31.85 -14:13:30.0: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461233.9497,10.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260712.4497 10.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.4497 2461233.9497 11.90 22:57:42.69 -07:25:41.5
63.83241 -56.61856 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.5 Astraea 0 0 0 12.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:57:42.69 -07:25:41.5: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:57:42.69 -07:25:41.5: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461233.9497,11.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260712.4497 11.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.4497 2461233.9497 12.62 23:25:19.23 -08:18:18.1
71.65568 -62.26075 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" EG Aqr
Type: UGSU
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.900 CV 19.000 CV 2454757.24450 0.075960000000 K:
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:25:19.23 -08:18:18.1: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:25:19.23 -08:18:18.1: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
EG Aqr,2461233.9497,12.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
EG Aqr 20260712.4497 12.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.4497 2461233.9497 13.14 23:16:27.42 -11:59:25.0
62.49090 -63.07519 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.117 Lomia -0 -0 0 13.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:16:27.42 -11:59:25.0: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:16:27.42 -11:59:25.0: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461233.9497,13.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260712.4497 13.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.4497 2461233.9497 13.47 22:53:44.12 -08:29:17.8
61.21395 -56.51076 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.78 Diana -1 1 1 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:53:44.12 -08:29:17.8: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:53:44.12 -08:29:17.8: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461233.9497,13.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260712.4497 13.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.4497 2461233.9497 14.06 22:59:19.97 -09:12:35.7
61.72163 -58.04614 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.303 Josephina 0 1 1 14.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:59:19.97 -09:12:35.7: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:59:19.97 -09:12:35.7: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461233.9497,14.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260712.4497 14.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.4497 2461233.9497 14.21 23:12:22.45 -06:30:49.4
69.64779 -58.72037 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.208 Lacrimosa -2 0 2 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:12:22.45 -06:30:49.4: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:12:22.45 -06:30:49.4: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461233.9497,14.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260712.4497 14.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461209.89052953 18.06.2026 09:22:11.751 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
First image: 2461209.89052953 18.06.2026 09:22:11.751 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Last image: 2461233.94996200 12.07.2026 10:47:46.717 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.99
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4672
Objects passed selection criteria: 4662
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3699.5
Average stars matched: 3605.5 (97.4591 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114072 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jul 11 21:08:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-146-gb95cfcf3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 12 07:48:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461209.89052953 18.06.2026 09:22:11.751 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
First image: 2461209.89052953 18.06.2026 09:22:11.751 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Last image: 2461233.94996200 12.07.2026 10:47:46.717 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 61
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24170
Objects passed selection criteria: 24128
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 21722.5
Average stars matched: 20996.5 (96.6578 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 130820 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jul 11 21:08:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-146-gb95cfcf3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 12 07:50:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461233.94933933
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits'
wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits'
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits'
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.599 -09:59:41.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:36.337 -10:00:41.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.599 -09:59:41.43
Second-epoch image center 23:08:36.337 -10:00:41.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0182 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:39.206 -10:00:27.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.599 -09:59:41.43
Second-epoch image center 23:08:39.206 -10:00:27.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0229 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:36.337 -10:00:41.66
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:39.206 -10:00:27.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01239 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3NQgTCDzO4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8FevHjpLES
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m0sMUZGDy0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QJPE72Irsf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 4809 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.1115 to 355.2218 deg, Dec -15.2530 to -4.6614 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.1115 to 355.2218 deg, Dec -15.2530 to -4.6614 deg
Loaded 4649 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3506 out of 3569 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3569 out of 4809 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.607800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.607800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.99
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 4809 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.1115 to 355.2218 deg, Dec -15.2530 to -4.6614 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.1115 to 355.2218 deg, Dec -15.2530 to -4.6614 deg
Loaded 4649 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3506 out of 3569 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3569 out of 4809 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 4861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.1114 to 355.2213 deg, Dec -15.2485 to -4.6432 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.1114 to 355.2213 deg, Dec -15.2485 to -4.6432 deg
Loaded 4652 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3553 out of 3609 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3609 out of 4861 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
2.4 pix Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
14.6 mag. Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3NQgTCDzO4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=297, bad_region=0, passed=4809
Got 4809 stars (including 4509 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4809 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.471 n_q1=249 n_q2=233 n_q3=233 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.187
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8FevHjpLES (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=284, bad_region=0, passed=4861
Got 4861 stars (including 4573 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4861 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4811 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4811 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.472 n_q1=250 n_q2=229 n_q3=234 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.124
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.m0sMUZGDy0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=296, bad_region=1, passed=2680
Got 2680 stars (including 2378 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2680 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.373 n_q1=229 n_q2=238 n_q3=234 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QJPE72Irsf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=304, bad_region=0, passed=2525
Got 2525 stars (including 2218 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2525 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.425 n_q1=230 n_q2=240 n_q3=230 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits sigma_overall=0.456 worst_q_ratio=1.187
ref2=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits sigma_overall=0.438 worst_q_ratio=1.124
new1=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits sigma_overall=0.400 worst_q_ratio=1.144
new2=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits sigma_overall=0.467 worst_q_ratio=1.254
reference average sigma_overall=0.447 worst_q_ratio=1.1555
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:05:31.85 -14:13:30.0: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:05:31.85 -14:13:30.0: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20309.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20309_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
Preparing report for the candidate 20309_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aqr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:05:31.85 -14:13:30.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.599 -09:59:41.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:36.337 -10:00:41.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.599 -09:59:41.43
Second-epoch image center 23:08:36.337 -10:00:41.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0182 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:39.206 -10:00:27.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.599 -09:59:41.43
Second-epoch image center 23:08:39.206 -10:00:27.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0229 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:36.337 -10:00:41.66
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:39.206 -10:00:27.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01239 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uKSFRKqj8F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EFNvYQyBNI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits &> /tmp/tmp.evzvUEXhZo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZVLM05cNJw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 25197 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.1001 to 355.2316 deg, Dec -15.2607 to -4.6369 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.1001 to 355.2316 deg, Dec -15.2607 to -4.6369 deg
Loaded 4666 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3834 out of 4035 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4035 out of 25197 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.490100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.490100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.75
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.75
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 25197 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.1001 to 355.2316 deg, Dec -15.2607 to -4.6369 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.1001 to 355.2316 deg, Dec -15.2607 to -4.6369 deg
Loaded 4666 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3834 out of 4035 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4035 out of 25197 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits (aperture=5.2)
Read 25267 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.0906 to 355.2333 deg, Dec -15.2571 to -4.6359 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.0906 to 355.2333 deg, Dec -15.2571 to -4.6359 deg
Loaded 4672 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3838 out of 4043 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4043 out of 25267 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 50 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
2.3 pix Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
1.9 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
1.9 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
14.7 mag. Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uKSFRKqj8F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=916, bad_region=0, passed=25187
Got 25187 stars (including 24235 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25187 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.587 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.454 n_q1=242 n_q2=228 n_q3=233 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.354
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EFNvYQyBNI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=918, bad_region=0, passed=25261
Got 25261 stars (including 24314 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25261 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=243 n_q2=224 n_q3=234 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.271
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.evzvUEXhZo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=607, bad_region=4, passed=18713
Got 18713 stars (including 18072 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18713 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18363 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18363 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18363 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=235 n_q2=239 n_q3=235 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZVLM05cNJw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=635, bad_region=3, passed=18415
Got 18415 stars (including 17743 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18089 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18090 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18090 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=241 n_q2=242 n_q3=230 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_062254_TTUQ1b1x1_3119705_JNs5prPK/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:28:58.62 -06:38:09.3: 9.74 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:35:51.39 -13:47:07.0: 11.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:13:54.62 -08:19:43.8: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:00:53.65 -08:43:30.7: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:05:04.11 -13:30:12.6: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:09:01.78 -13:02:01.8: 12.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:22:56.88 -15:11:05.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:23:54.90 -14:10:38.1: 13.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:24:24.58 -13:09:10.6: 13.68 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:35:51.39 -13:47:07.0: 11.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:51.39 -13:47:07.0: ref_mag=11.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8663 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:28:58.62 -06:38:09.3: 9.75 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.74 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:00:53.65 -08:43:30.7: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:13:54.62 -08:19:43.8: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:58.62 -06:38:09.3: ref_mag=9.74 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0938 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:05:04.11 -13:30:12.6: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:22:56.88 -15:11:05.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:22:56.88 -15:11:05.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:00:53.65 -08:43:30.7: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7928 delta=-0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:13:54.62 -08:19:43.8: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5675 delta=-0.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:23:54.90 -14:10:38.1: 13.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:24:24.58 -13:09:10.6: 13.44 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:09:01.78 -13:02:01.8: 12.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:05:04.11 -13:30:12.6: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9400 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:23:54.90 -14:10:38.1: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6543 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:24.58 -13:09:10.6: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8685 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:09:01.78 -13:02:01.8: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7065 delta=-0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:57:42.69 -07:25:41.5: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:57:42.69 -07:25:41.5: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:11:16.26 -05:05:04.8: 13.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:25:19.23 -08:18:18.1: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:23:31.63 -07:15:42.4: 12.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:38:44.77 -12:27:39.7: 13.88 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:33:30.61 -15:05:20.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:39:08.69 -14:48:49.1: 13.43 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:16:27.42 -11:59:25.0: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:39:14.76 -14:09:38.2: 13.67 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:39:12.34 -14:09:26.3: 13.81 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:25:19.23 -08:18:18.1: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:23:31.63 -07:15:42.4: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:11:16.26 -05:05:04.8: 13.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:23:31.63 -07:15:42.4: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1504 delta=-0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:11:16.26 -05:05:04.8: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1319 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:38:44.77 -12:27:39.7: 13.86 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:33:30.61 -15:05:20.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:30.61 -15:05:20.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:39:08.69 -14:48:49.1: 13.49 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:44.77 -12:27:39.7: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4033 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:08.69 -14:48:49.1: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.1710 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:16:27.42 -11:59:25.0: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:39:14.76 -14:09:38.2: 13.74 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:14.76 -14:09:38.2: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.3427 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:39:12.34 -14:09:26.3: 13.59 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:12.34 -14:09:26.3: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.3966 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:37:16.30 -14:15:02.1: 14.13 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:14:35.54 -07:58:42.7: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:36:22.20 -15:02:24.5: 13.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:38:03.54 -13:18:27.8: 14.00 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:37:21.21 -14:08:04.2: 13.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:37:37.08 -15:00:51.5: 13.75 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:35:11.30 -13:44:14.6: 13.80 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:14:35.54 -07:58:42.7: 12.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:14:35.54 -07:58:42.7: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2320 delta=-0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:37:16.30 -14:15:02.1: 14.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:16.30 -14:15:02.1: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3883 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:38:03.54 -13:18:27.8: 13.91 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:36:22.20 -15:02:24.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:22.20 -15:02:24.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:03.54 -13:18:27.8: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4827 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:37:21.21 -14:08:04.2: 13.73 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:21.21 -14:08:04.2: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5728 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:37:37.08 -15:00:51.5: 13.81 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:37.08 -15:00:51.5: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4139 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:35:11.30 -13:44:14.6: 13.91 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:11.30 -13:44:14.6: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4968 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:53:44.12 -08:29:17.8: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:39:31.91 -12:06:35.2: 14.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:33:41.49 -14:11:50.1: 13.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:36:31.16 -14:03:26.7: 14.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:39:11.92 -12:40:45.8: 14.25 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:35:35.09 -13:25:49.2: 14.37 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:33:46.40 -14:21:11.0: 13.89 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:39:31.91 -12:06:35.2: 13.77 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:53:44.12 -08:29:17.8: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:31.91 -12:06:35.2: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5802 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:33:41.49 -14:11:50.1: 13.87 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:41.49 -14:11:50.1: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5610 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:39:11.92 -12:40:45.8: 13.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:36:31.16 -14:03:26.7: 14.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:11.92 -12:40:45.8: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6992 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:31.16 -14:03:26.7: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7129 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:35:35.09 -13:25:49.2: 13.90 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:35.09 -13:25:49.2: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7701 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:33:46.40 -14:21:11.0: 13.93 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:46.40 -14:21:11.0: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6991 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:38:58.76 -14:35:20.8: 14.27 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:37:44.25 -15:00:43.7: 13.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:26:10.81 -14:56:50.5: 14.17 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:36:27.14 -14:20:35.0: 13.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:36:15.38 -13:03:31.4: 14.11 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:38:58.76 -14:35:20.8: 14.25 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:58.76 -14:35:20.8: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7851 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:37:44.25 -15:00:43.7: 13.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:44.25 -15:00:43.7: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5649 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:36:36.31 -14:21:12.8: 13.74 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:26:10.81 -14:56:50.5: 14.08 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:36:27.14 -14:20:35.0: 14.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:26:10.81 -14:56:50.5: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7530 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:27.14 -14:20:35.0: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5364 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:36:15.38 -13:03:31.4: 13.93 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:15.38 -13:03:31.4: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8557 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:36:36.31 -14:21:12.8: 13.82 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:36.31 -14:21:12.8: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8966 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:35:07.21 -13:42:02.7: 14.24 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:38:38.41 -10:07:06.9: 14.05 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:37:39.49 -12:20:32.1: 13.84 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:38:59.97 -06:22:21.8: 14.02 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:34:58.41 -13:27:31.1: 13.92 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:35:07.21 -13:42:02.7: 13.94 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:07.21 -13:42:02.7: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6073 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:38:38.41 -10:07:06.9: 14.05 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:37:39.49 -12:20:32.1: 13.95 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:38.41 -10:07:06.9: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8231 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:37:51.20 -11:59:49.2: 13.94 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:39.49 -12:20:32.1: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.9162 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:38:59.97 -06:22:21.8: 13.86 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:59.97 -06:22:21.8: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6450 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:34:58.41 -13:27:31.1: 14.06 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:58.41 -13:27:31.1: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8316 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:37:51.20 -11:59:49.2: 13.90 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:51.20 -11:59:49.2: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.9268 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:59:19.97 -09:12:35.7: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:12:22.45 -06:30:49.4: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:59:19.97 -09:12:35.7: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:12:22.45 -06:30:49.4: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32038.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32149.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32306.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32457.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32640.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32663.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31872_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31872_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31873_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31873_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31874_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31874_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31876_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31876_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31879_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31879_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:33:09.89 -06:20:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31880_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31880_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31881_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31881_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31882_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31882_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31883_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31883_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31902_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31902_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31925_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31925_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:05:31.84 -14:13:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32038_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
Preparing report for the candidate 32038_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32068_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32068_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:53:25.12 -11:35:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32149_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
Preparing report for the candidate 32149_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32283_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32283_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32306_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
Preparing report for the candidate 32306_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32312_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32312_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32316_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32316_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32339_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32339_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32349_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32349_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32359_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32359_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32365_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32365_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32371_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32371_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32374_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32374_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32378_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32378_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32399_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32399_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32416_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32416_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32423_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32423_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32427_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32427_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32432_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32432_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32438_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32438_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32457_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
Preparing report for the candidate 32457_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32498_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32498_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32503_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32503_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32510_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32510_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32521_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32521_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32524_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32524_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32535_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32535_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32538_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32538_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32556_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32556_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32557_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32557_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32559_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32559_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32572_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32572_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32589_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32589_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32590_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32590_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32594_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32594_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32602_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32602_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32619_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 32619_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
