This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.4373 2461233.9373 12.21 00:00:20.38 -13:27:19.4
79.27868 -71.84858 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.23 Thalia -1 -1 1 12.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:00:20.38 -13:27:19.4: 14.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:00:20.38 -13:27:19.4: 15.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 12.4374* 00 00 20.38 -13 27 19.4 12.2 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461233.9373,12.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260712.4373 12.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.4373 2461233.9373 13.14 00:05:57.03 -09:49:55.2
88.97433 -69.64653 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.118 Peitho -1 -1 1 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:05:57.03 -09:49:55.2: 14.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:05:57.03 -09:49:55.2: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 12.4374* 00 05 57.03 -09 49 55.2 13.1 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461233.9373,13.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260712.4373 13.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.4373 2461233.9373 13.22 00:03:12.31 -13:19:08.6
81.32355 -72.17341 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.259 Aletheia -0 -0 0 13.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:03:12.31 -13:19:08.6: 14.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:03:12.31 -13:19:08.6: 15.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 12.4374* 00 03 12.31 -13 19 08.6 13.2 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461233.9373,13.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260712.4373 13.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461191.93631795 31.05.2026 10:28:07.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
First image: 2461191.93631795 31.05.2026 10:28:07.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
Last image: 2461233.93763605 12.07.2026 10:30:01.755 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.73
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 3531
Objects passed selection criteria: 3529
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3068
Average stars matched: 2565.25 (83.6131 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112964 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jul 11 21:08:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-146-gb95cfcf3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 12 07:51:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461191.93631795 31.05.2026 10:28:07.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
First image: 2461191.93631795 31.05.2026 10:28:07.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
Last image: 2461233.93763605 12.07.2026 10:30:01.755 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 80
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 19225
Objects passed selection criteria: 19187
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 17279.5
Average stars matched: 14697.5 (85.0574 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 125528 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jul 11 21:08:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-146-gb95cfcf3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 12 07:54:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461233.93705438
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits'
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits'
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits'
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
Image size: 938.7'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:18.839 -09:59:16.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53
Second-epoch image center 00:00:18.839 -09:59:16.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0603 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:18.037 -09:59:55.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53
Second-epoch image center 00:00:18.037 -09:59:55.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0541 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:18.839 -09:59:16.03
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:18.037 -09:59:55.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01153 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NBmN3lWvkF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FtcdCIdBPZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uWqn1FjI3Z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9NyLVNr2Z5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 1896 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0006 to 359.9929 deg, Dec -15.2778 to -4.6540 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0006 to 359.9929 deg, Dec -15.2778 to -4.6540 deg
Loaded 168841 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1519 out of 1541 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 1541 out of 1896 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.417000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.417000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.73
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.69
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.69
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 1896 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0006 to 359.9929 deg, Dec -15.2778 to -4.6540 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0006 to 359.9929 deg, Dec -15.2778 to -4.6540 deg
Loaded 168841 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1519 out of 1541 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 1541 out of 1896 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits (aperture=6.7)
Read 3262 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0005 to 359.9947 deg, Dec -15.2733 to -4.6486 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0005 to 359.9947 deg, Dec -15.2733 to -4.6486 deg
Loaded 168842 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2602 out of 2639 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2639 out of 3262 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
2.4 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.7 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
14.3 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.NBmN3lWvkF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=196, bad_region=0, passed=1896
Got 1896 stars (including 1700 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1896 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0195 through 0 to 8.1581, gap 8.1581 to 352.0195
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0194 through 0 to 8.1585, gap 8.1585 to 352.0194
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.415 n_q1=234 n_q2=227 n_q3=246 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FtcdCIdBPZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=207, bad_region=0, passed=3262
Got 3262 stars (including 3054 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3262 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013035 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010428 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0096 through 0 to 8.1574, gap 8.1574 to 352.0096
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0097 through 0 to 8.1577, gap 8.1577 to 352.0097
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.490 n_q1=237 n_q2=213 n_q3=251 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uWqn1FjI3Z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=225, bad_region=0, passed=3593
Got 3593 stars (including 3362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3593 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7371 through 0 to 8.1600, gap 8.1600 to 351.7371
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7367 through 0 to 8.1604, gap 8.1604 to 351.7367
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3564 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3564 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=237 n_q2=225 n_q3=259 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9NyLVNr2Z5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=220, bad_region=0, passed=3603
Got 3603 stars (including 3380 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3603 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7373 through 0 to 8.1600, gap 8.1600 to 351.7373
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7369 through 0 to 8.1604, gap 8.1604 to 351.7369
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=243 n_q2=222 n_q3=254 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.072
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits sigma_overall=0.420 worst_q_ratio=1.103
ref2=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits sigma_overall=0.419 worst_q_ratio=1.231
new1=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits sigma_overall=0.323 worst_q_ratio=1.162
new2=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits sigma_overall=0.300 worst_q_ratio=1.072
reference average sigma_overall=0.4195 worst_q_ratio=1.167
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_astrometric_residuals.png (942 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416_astrometric_residuals.png (942 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
Image size: 938.7'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:18.839 -09:59:16.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53
Second-epoch image center 00:00:18.839 -09:59:16.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0603 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:18.037 -09:59:55.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53
Second-epoch image center 00:00:18.037 -09:59:55.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0541 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:18.839 -09:59:16.03
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:18.037 -09:59:55.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01153 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ghpJuL8B65
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5AJ5kbSTAQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits &> /tmp/tmp.x0779J859n
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IkwvlLqIDi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 12067 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0006 to 359.9978 deg, Dec -15.2876 to -4.6411 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0006 to 359.9978 deg, Dec -15.2876 to -4.6411 deg
Loaded 169181 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3550 out of 3632 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3632 out of 12067 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.224050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.224050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.80
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.80
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 12067 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0006 to 359.9978 deg, Dec -15.2876 to -4.6411 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0006 to 359.9978 deg, Dec -15.2876 to -4.6411 deg
Loaded 169181 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3550 out of 3632 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3632 out of 12067 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 18032 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0005 to 359.9975 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.6400 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0005 to 359.9975 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.6400 deg
Loaded 169064 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3512 out of 3632 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3632 out of 18032 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 72 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
2.3 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.8 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
14.5 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ghpJuL8B65 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=343, bad_region=0, passed=12062
Got 12062 stars (including 11705 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12062 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9970 through 0 to 8.1581, gap 8.1581 to 351.9970
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9970 through 0 to 8.1585, gap 8.1585 to 351.9970
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=231 n_q2=241 n_q3=225 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5AJ5kbSTAQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=533, bad_region=0, passed=18027
Got 18027 stars (including 17466 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18027 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013035 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010428 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9881 through 0 to 8.1574, gap 8.1574 to 351.9881
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9883 through 0 to 8.1577, gap 8.1577 to 351.9883
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.485 n_q1=239 n_q2=209 n_q3=248 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.x0779J859n (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=610, bad_region=4, passed=19813
Got 19813 stars (including 19175 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19813 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7034 through 0 to 8.2188, gap 8.2188 to 351.7034
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19645 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7028 through 0 to 8.2192, gap 8.2192 to 351.7028
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19645 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19645 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=240 n_q2=225 n_q3=251 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IkwvlLqIDi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=591, bad_region=5, passed=19728
Got 19728 stars (including 19103 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19728 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7034 through 0 to 8.2183, gap 8.2183 to 351.7034
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7028 through 0 to 8.2187, gap 8.2187 to 351.7028
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=242 n_q2=221 n_q3=250 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-29-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_053345_TTUQ1b1x1_1567989_a9UDPjSz/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:00:20.38 -13:27:19.4: 14.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:51.13 -14:58:34.6: 12.69 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:28:36.50 -14:32:30.4: 13.24 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 23:41:57.19 -07:37:14.3: 12.87 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:19:45.14 -14:16:31.4: 13.33 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:25:00.24 -14:45:00.0: 13.01 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:52.54 -12:57:51.9: 13.07 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:25:40.81 -14:14:45.3: 13.22 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:26:25.44 -13:25:00.6: 13.42 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:28:30.77 -14:50:11.0: 13.35 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:25:00.24 -14:45:00.0: 13.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 23:41:57.19 -07:37:14.3: 12.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:00:20.38 -13:27:19.4: 15.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:28:36.50 -14:32:30.4: 13.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:19:45.14 -14:16:31.4: 13.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:25:40.81 -14:14:45.3: 13.24 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:30:52.54 -12:57:51.9: 13.42 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:30:51.13 -14:58:34.6: 13.16 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:00.24 -14:45:00.0: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.7377 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:41:57.19 -07:37:14.3: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3041 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:36.50 -14:32:30.4: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.9123 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:19:45.14 -14:16:31.4: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.0272 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:40.81 -14:14:45.3: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.9344 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:52.54 -12:57:51.9: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.8513 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:51.13 -14:58:34.6: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.3358 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:26:25.44 -13:25:00.6: 13.65 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:28:30.77 -14:50:11.0: 13.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:25.44 -13:25:00.6: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.0046 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:30.77 -14:50:11.0: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.9051 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:19:04.98 -14:35:58.9: 13.33 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:22:50.02 -14:55:36.0: 13.33 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:25:08.63 -14:41:41.1: 13.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:40.31 -13:12:06.9: 13.34 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:30.43 -14:44:06.3: 13.15 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:05:57.03 -09:49:55.2: 14.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:49.96 -13:02:29.8: 13.29 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:25:01.54 -14:16:15.9: 13.23 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:28:28.23 -12:35:07.6: 13.18 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:22:50.02 -14:55:36.0: 13.53 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:30:40.31 -13:12:06.9: 13.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:30:49.96 -13:02:29.8: 13.44 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:30:30.43 -14:44:06.3: 13.86 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:50.02 -14:55:36.0: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.9717 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:05:57.03 -09:49:55.2: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:25:08.63 -14:41:41.1: 13.45 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:40.31 -13:12:06.9: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=12.9496 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:19:04.98 -14:35:58.9: 13.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:49.96 -13:02:29.8: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.0227 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:30.43 -14:44:06.3: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=12.9645 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:08.63 -14:41:41.1: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.9673 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:19:04.98 -14:35:58.9: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.0785 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:25:01.54 -14:16:15.9: 13.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:28:28.23 -12:35:07.6: 13.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:01.54 -14:16:15.9: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.0121 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:28.23 -12:35:07.6: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.0597 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:29:20.59 -14:20:13.7: 13.18 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:29:48.96 -12:58:49.6: 13.29 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:22:52.99 -15:05:57.8: 13.20 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:30.38 -12:57:52.2: 13.30 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:26:17.19 -15:05:12.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:29:00.35 -14:51:57.5: 13.09 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:35.60 -14:35:54.1: 13.48 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:30:30.38 -12:57:52.2: 13.46 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:29:48.96 -12:58:49.6: 13.58 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:29:20.59 -14:20:13.7: 13.91 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:22:52.99 -15:05:57.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:52.99 -15:05:57.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:26:17.19 -15:05:12.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:17.19 -15:05:12.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:30.38 -12:57:52.2: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.8343 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:48.96 -12:58:49.6: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.0621 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:20.59 -14:20:13.7: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.0923 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:26:33.86 -14:58:37.1: 13.35 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:29:00.35 -14:51:57.5: 13.63 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:00.35 -14:51:57.5: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.0436 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:30:35.60 -14:35:54.1: 14.06 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:35.60 -14:35:54.1: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=12.9898 delta=0.80 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:26:33.86 -14:58:37.1: 13.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:33.86 -14:58:37.1: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.0721 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:28:29.81 -13:56:21.0: 13.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:26:49.16 -14:05:37.6: 13.47 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:25:04.37 -14:17:04.4: 13.61 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:29:47.56 -12:32:54.3: 13.34 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:25:42.21 -14:08:13.2: 13.46 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:03:12.31 -13:19:08.6: 14.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:55.25 -12:34:55.3: 13.14 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:26:49.16 -14:05:37.6: 14.04 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:28:29.81 -13:56:21.0: 13.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:25:04.37 -14:17:04.4: 13.44 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:25:42.21 -14:08:13.2: 13.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:49.16 -14:05:37.6: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.2215 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:29:47.56 -12:32:54.3: 13.56 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:29.81 -13:56:21.0: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.2100 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:04.37 -14:17:04.4: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.1018 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:42.21 -14:08:13.2: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.0832 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:47.56 -12:32:54.3: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.1348 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:26:21.46 -13:50:45.0: 13.68 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:03:12.31 -13:19:08.6: 15.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:30:55.25 -12:34:55.3: 13.58 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:55.25 -12:34:55.3: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.0395 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:26:21.46 -13:50:45.0: 13.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:21.46 -13:50:45.0: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.1485 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:25:32.41 -13:52:24.9: 13.15 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:26:44.02 -14:13:41.5: 13.29 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:27:23.20 -14:34:25.9: 13.24 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:53.36 -06:07:30.8: 13.44 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:31:30.71 -08:37:09.2: 13.60 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:28:51.61 -13:45:24.8: 13.52 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:30:53.36 -06:07:30.8: 13.65 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:27:23.20 -14:34:25.9: 13.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:26:44.02 -14:13:41.5: 13.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:25:32.41 -13:52:24.9: 13.55 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:31:30.71 -08:37:09.2: 13.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:23.20 -14:34:25.9: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.1846 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:44.02 -14:13:41.5: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.1247 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:32.41 -13:52:24.9: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2014 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:53.36 -06:07:30.8: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.3814 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:30.71 -08:37:09.2: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.2937 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:25:51.33 -14:37:06.4: 13.62 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:28:51.61 -13:45:24.8: 13.52 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:51.61 -13:45:24.8: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.1238 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:25:51.33 -14:37:06.4: 13.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:51.33 -14:37:06.4: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.2122 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:57.54 -14:47:27.9: 13.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:22:09.22 -13:04:01.1: 13.84 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:29:24.81 -11:45:20.7: 13.58 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:17:10.16 -14:25:27.3: 13.74 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:28:38.29 -12:40:59.8: 13.59 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:31:02.73 -11:03:01.2: 13.31 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:28:38.29 -12:40:59.8: 14.07 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:29:24.81 -11:45:20.7: 14.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:22:09.22 -13:04:01.1: 13.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:30:57.54 -14:47:27.9: 13.87 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:17:10.16 -14:25:27.3: 13.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:38.29 -12:40:59.8: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.2265 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:09.22 -13:04:01.1: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.3912 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:24.81 -11:45:20.7: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.2921 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:57.54 -14:47:27.9: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.2202 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:10.16 -14:25:27.3: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.3766 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:19:37.34 -14:53:35.6: 13.30 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:31:02.73 -11:03:01.2: 13.93 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:02.73 -11:03:01.2: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.2988 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:19:37.34 -14:53:35.6: 13.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:19:37.34 -14:53:35.6: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.2881 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:20:52.02 -13:22:39.9: 13.63 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:28:50.20 -13:35:17.4: 13.50 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:23:59.09 -14:57:29.8: 13.47 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:31:09.12 -11:07:17.8: 13.34 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:20:45.07 -14:19:27.9: 14.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:57.58 -11:37:15.2: 14.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:20:52.02 -13:22:39.9: 13.86 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:31:09.12 -11:07:17.8: 13.88 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:28:50.20 -13:35:17.4: 13.99 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:23:59.09 -14:57:29.8: 14.04 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:20:45.07 -14:19:27.9: 13.72 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:20:52.02 -13:22:39.9: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3447 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:59.09 -14:57:29.8: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.0753 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:09.12 -11:07:17.8: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3867 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:50.20 -13:35:17.4: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.2425 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:20:45.07 -14:19:27.9: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.3323 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:29:39.80 -12:07:20.5: 13.29 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:30:57.58 -11:37:15.2: 13.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:57.58 -11:37:15.2: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.2314 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:29:39.80 -12:07:20.5: 13.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:39.80 -12:07:20.5: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4075 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:16.46 -11:14:52.2: 13.48 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:29:52.32 -12:53:20.8: 13.67 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:38.17 -11:13:03.5: 13.20 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:27:09.17 -14:43:22.7: 13.32 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:31.63 -14:26:04.2: 13.42 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:29:52.32 -12:53:20.8: 13.51 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:30:16.46 -11:14:52.2: 13.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:52.32 -12:53:20.8: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2816 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:28:02.79 -12:22:06.5: 13.93 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:16.46 -11:14:52.2: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3162 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:30:38.17 -11:13:03.5: 13.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:27:09.17 -14:43:22.7: 13.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:30:31.63 -14:26:04.2: 14.26 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:38.17 -11:13:03.5: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.3220 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:09.17 -14:43:22.7: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.2630 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:31.63 -14:26:04.2: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.2374 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:31:03.69 -11:26:09.0: 13.58 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:28:02.79 -12:22:06.5: 14.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:02.79 -12:22:06.5: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.3157 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:31:03.69 -11:26:09.0: 13.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:03.69 -11:26:09.0: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.3489 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:26:16.44 -14:44:07.7: 13.80 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:29:29.66 -14:35:17.2: 13.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:27:34.84 -14:16:21.5: 13.62 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:25:51.74 -14:15:56.9: 13.83 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:00.20 -14:55:13.7: 13.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:26:16.44 -14:44:07.7: 13.61 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:29:29.66 -14:35:17.2: 14.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:30:00.20 -14:55:13.7: 14.07 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:25:51.74 -14:15:56.9: 13.95 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:16.44 -14:44:07.7: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3213 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-16-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 00:27:34.84 -14:16:21.5: 14.05 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.24
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:00.20 -14:55:13.7: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.24 new_mean_mag=13.3614 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:51.74 -14:15:56.9: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.4094 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:34.84 -14:16:21.5: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.3319 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out26578.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out26216.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out26390.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out26456.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26216_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
Preparing report for the candidate 26216_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26270_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26270_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26327_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26327_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:28:07.63 -14:59:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26331_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26331_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26351_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26351_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26353_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26353_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26360_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26360_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26361_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26361_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26363_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26363_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26372_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26372_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:31:24.82 -09:38:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26377_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26377_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26380_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26380_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26381_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26381_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26389_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26389_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26390_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
Preparing report for the candidate 26390_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26395_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26395_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26398_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26398_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26399_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26399_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26401_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26401_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26404_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26404_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26406_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26406_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26408_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26408_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26413_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26413_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26414_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26414_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26415_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26415_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:30:44.38 -14:48:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26417_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26417_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26419_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26419_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26429_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26429_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26433_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26433_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26434_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26434_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26441_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26441_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26445_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26445_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26448_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26448_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26450_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26450_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26451_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26451_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26453_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26453_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26456_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
Preparing report for the candidate 26456_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26458_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26458_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26463_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26463_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26472_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26472_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26480_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26480_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26481_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26481_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26489_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26489_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26492_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26492_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26497_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26497_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26502_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26502_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26506_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26506_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26507_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26507_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26513_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26513_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26514_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26514_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26515_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26515_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26516_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26516_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26534_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26534_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26536_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26536_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26537_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26537_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26540_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26540_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26544_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26544_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26545_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26545_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26546_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26546_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26548_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26548_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26549_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26549_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26557_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26557_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26558_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26558_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26560_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26560_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26562_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26562_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26566_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26566_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26569_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26569_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26571_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26571_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26578_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26578_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:29:29.66 -14:35:17.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.33)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.028 2374740920366668544 007.37360282556 -14.58839595626 13.6711 13.1652 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.028#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26585_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26585_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26590_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26590_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26608_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 26608_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-30-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks