This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.2090 2461233.7091 11.13 19:15:08.27 -29:32:05.9
8.24678 -17.74080 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia 1 -0 1 11.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 19:15:08.27 -29:32:05.9: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 19:15:08.27 -29:32:05.9: 14.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461233.7091,11.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260712.2090 11.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.2090 2461233.7091 9.96 18:35:32.24 -36:48:52.0
357.96146 -12.93488 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J183532-3648.9
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.140 V Y 0.540 V 2452063.85000 70.705803000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:35:32.24 -36:48:52.0: 10.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:35:32.24 -36:48:52.0: 10.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.87 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J183532-3648.9,2461233.7091,9.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J183532-3648.9 20260712.2090 9.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.2090 2461233.7091 11.86 18:58:52.11 -33:22:24.3
3.17247 -15.95763 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J185852-3322.4
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.850 V Y 1.470 V 2452250.48400 94.278175000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:58:52.11 -33:22:24.3: 13.43 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:58:52.11 -33:22:24.3: 13.18 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J185852-3322.4,2461233.7091,11.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J185852-3322.4 20260712.2090 11.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.2090 2461233.7091 10.78 18:40:23.68 -37:35:24.5
357.63633 -14.13373 galactic CrA Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J184024-3735.4
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.330 V Y 0.710 V 2452317.30000 126.502800000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:40:23.68 -37:35:24.5: 11.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:40:23.68 -37:35:24.5: 11.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J184024-3735.4,2461233.7091,10.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J184024-3735.4 20260712.2090 10.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.2090 2461233.7091 11.94 18:25:48.61 -35:25:18.8
358.39716 -10.56518 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J182548.70-352518.2
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.150 V 14.030 V
The object was found in astcheck.25535 1999 XF144 289 -215 361 17.1 0 -0
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the predicted asteroid brightness, but the matched variable star above likely accounts for this object.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:25:48.61 -35:25:18.8: 13.11 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:25:48.61 -35:25:18.8: 12.90 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J182548.70-352518.2,2461233.7091,11.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J182548.70-352518.2 20260712.2090 11.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.2090 2461233.7091 11.84 18:32:23.82 -32:29:21.4
1.68741 -10.52301 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J183224-3229.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.179 Ic Y 0.622 Ic 2454645.80000 800.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:32:23.82 -32:29:21.4: 12.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:32:23.82 -32:29:21.4: 12.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J183224-3229.3,2461233.7091,11.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J183224-3229.3 20260712.2090 11.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.2090 2461233.7091 11.53 18:33:17.06 -38:19:51.1
356.35442 -13.15344 galactic CrA Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J183317-3819.9
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.530 V Y 1.560 V 2452349.50000 215.905579000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:33:17.06 -38:19:51.1: 12.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:33:17.06 -38:19:51.1: 12.68 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J183317-3819.9,2461233.7091,11.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J183317-3819.9 20260712.2090 11.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.2090 2461233.7091 12.13 18:23:03.30 -33:11:52.4
0.16655 -9.07176 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J182303-3311.8
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.103 Ic Y 0.374 Ic 2453089.10000 253.500000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:23:03.30 -33:11:52.4: 13.31 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:23:03.30 -33:11:52.4: 13.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J182303-3311.8,2461233.7091,12.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J182303-3311.8 20260712.2090 12.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.2090 2461233.7091 11.98 18:47:10.02 -32:03:22.3
3.42484 -13.17688 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J184710.06-320323.2
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.320 V 13.130 V 2456894.60000 114.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:47:10.02 -32:03:22.3: 13.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:47:10.02 -32:03:22.3: 13.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J184710.06-320323.2,2461233.7091,11.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J184710.06-320323.2 20260712.2090 11.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.2090 2461233.7091 11.82 18:18:12.67 -31:08:03.7
1.55380 -7.22162 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J181812.59-310802.9
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.320 V 13.600 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:18:12.67 -31:08:03.7: 12.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:18:12.67 -31:08:03.7: 12.96 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J181812.59-310802.9,2461233.7091,11.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J181812.59-310802.9 20260712.2090 11.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.90606747 17.05.2026 09:44:34.229 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
First image: 2461177.90606747 17.05.2026 09:44:34.229 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
Last image: 2461233.70932109 12.07.2026 05:01:15.342 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8876
Objects passed selection criteria: 8846
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6830.75
Average stars matched: 6778.25 (99.2314 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118880 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jul 11 21:08:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-146-gb95cfcf3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 12 00:06:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.90606747 17.05.2026 09:44:34.229 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
First image: 2461177.90606747 17.05.2026 09:44:34.229 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
Last image: 2461233.70932109 12.07.2026 05:01:15.342 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 129
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.03
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 37 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 117081
Objects passed selection criteria: 116809
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 88830
Average stars matched: 87156.2 (98.1158 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1894624 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jul 11 21:08:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-146-gb95cfcf3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 12 00:12:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461233.70877985
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits'
wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
Image size: 937.3'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:55.345 -34:00:44.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Image size: 941.1'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:57.950 -33:58:21.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:55.345 -34:00:44.75
Second-epoch image center 18:46:57.950 -33:58:21.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0409 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Image size: 941.1'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:56.814 -33:58:59.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:55.345 -34:00:44.75
Second-epoch image center 18:46:56.814 -33:58:59.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0296 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:46:57.950 -33:58:21.03
Second-epoch second image center 18:46:56.814 -33:58:59.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01148 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.G8LBdlBCXK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XNDWrcctpx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sviObuv5gY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W7XremGLIF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 12132 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7342 to 291.6638 deg, Dec -39.2814 to -28.4960 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7342 to 291.6638 deg, Dec -39.2814 to -28.4960 deg
Loaded 18836 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9183 out of 9536 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9536 out of 12132 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.405200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.405200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 12132 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7342 to 291.6638 deg, Dec -39.2814 to -28.4960 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7342 to 291.6638 deg, Dec -39.2814 to -28.4960 deg
Loaded 18836 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9183 out of 9536 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9536 out of 12132 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 8875 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7344 to 291.6568 deg, Dec -39.2792 to -28.4958 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7344 to 291.6568 deg, Dec -39.2792 to -28.4958 deg
Loaded 18834 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7151 out of 7378 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7378 out of 8875 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
2.9 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
2.9 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
13.8 mag. Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
12.6 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
12.6 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.6 (SNR ) 10.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.G8LBdlBCXK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=925, bad_region=0, passed=12132
Got 12132 stars (including 11195 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12132 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11811 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1010)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits N_match=917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.630 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.668 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.781 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.655 n_q1=255 n_q2=209 n_q3=256 n_q4=197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XNDWrcctpx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=733, bad_region=0, passed=8875
Got 8875 stars (including 8135 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8875 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8684 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8683 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits N_match=917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.651 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.769 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.759 n_q1=252 n_q2=200 n_q3=263 n_q4=202 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sviObuv5gY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=233, bad_region=0, passed=3274
Got 3274 stars (including 3037 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3274 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.3 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3125 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.3 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3124 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3124 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1008)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits N_match=917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=235 n_q2=128 n_q3=352 n_q4=202 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.W7XremGLIF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=232, bad_region=0, passed=3239
Got 3239 stars (including 3000 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3239 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.3 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3084 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.3 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1008)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits N_match=915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=232 n_q2=132 n_q3=349 n_q4=202 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.222
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits sigma_overall=0.630 worst_q_ratio=1.241
ref2=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits sigma_overall=0.651 worst_q_ratio=1.181
new1=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits sigma_overall=0.439 worst_q_ratio=1.178
new2=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits sigma_overall=0.446 worst_q_ratio=1.222
reference average sigma_overall=0.6405 worst_q_ratio=1.211
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259_astrometric_residuals.png (917 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.59 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252_astrometric_residuals.png (917 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.61 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130_astrometric_residuals.png (917 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131_astrometric_residuals.png (915 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:13:19.88 -29:21:09.7: 9.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:13:19.88 -29:21:09.7: 9.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.73 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:13:19.88 -29:21:09.7: ref_mag=9.73 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.9975 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20061_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 20061_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20105_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 20105_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.59 -29:04:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20124_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 20124_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:39.26 -34:06:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
Image size: 937.3'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:55.345 -34:00:44.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Image size: 941.1'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:57.950 -33:58:21.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:55.345 -34:00:44.75
Second-epoch image center 18:46:57.950 -33:58:21.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0409 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Image size: 941.1'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:56.814 -33:58:59.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:55.345 -34:00:44.75
Second-epoch image center 18:46:56.814 -33:58:59.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0296 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:46:57.950 -33:58:21.03
Second-epoch second image center 18:46:56.814 -33:58:59.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01148 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vvl7HqSG0w
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eg62HPwDuw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FJO8uqSBl9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits &> /tmp/tmp.68pYguoywW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 152931 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.6997 to 291.7264 deg, Dec -39.2862 to -28.4626 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.6997 to 291.7264 deg, Dec -39.2862 to -28.4626 deg
Loaded 18967 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13253 out of 16001 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16001 out of 152931 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.189300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.189300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.03
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 152931 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.6997 to 291.7264 deg, Dec -39.2862 to -28.4626 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.6997 to 291.7264 deg, Dec -39.2862 to -28.4626 deg
Loaded 18967 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13253 out of 16001 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16001 out of 152931 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 120998 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7001 to 291.7497 deg, Dec -39.2844 to -28.4641 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7001 to 291.7497 deg, Dec -39.2844 to -28.4641 deg
Loaded 18970 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13876 out of 16002 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16002 out of 120998 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 118 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
13.9 mag. Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.8 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Vvl7HqSG0w (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=13955, bad_region=1, passed=152904
Got 152904 stars (including 138738 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 152904 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150799 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150796 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 920 stars left (next iteration limit 1013)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits N_match=920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.643 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.714 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.779 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.664 n_q1=254 n_q2=220 n_q3=243 n_q4=203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.212
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eg62HPwDuw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=9362, bad_region=1, passed=120982
Got 120982 stars (including 111450 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 120982 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 119657 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 119656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 119473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 923 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits N_match=923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.659 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.683 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.796 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.694 n_q1=250 n_q2=220 n_q3=236 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.207
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FJO8uqSBl9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1502, bad_region=1, passed=42081
Got 42081 stars (including 40495 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42081 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40614 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40612 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1010)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits N_match=917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=212 n_q2=129 n_q3=362 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.68pYguoywW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1462, bad_region=0, passed=42031
Got 42031 stars (including 40490 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42031 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40512 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1010)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits N_match=917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.557 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=210 n_q2=132 n_q3=365 n_q4=210 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-00-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_000237_TTUQ1b1x1_2668964_K7iaGPq0/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:33:09.18 -32:15:33.7: 11.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:14:10.08 -30:09:16.3: 12.26 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:13:38.89 -29:12:46.3: 11.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:15:52.46 -29:12:22.8: 12.62 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:27:58.83 -31:21:38.7: 12.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:16:12.22 -32:18:43.5: 11.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:33:20.58 -31:57:33.0: 12.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:18:14.11 -29:11:25.8: 12.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:13:19.88 -29:21:09.6: 9.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:07:15.79 -37:49:40.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:33:09.18 -32:15:33.7: 12.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:27:58.83 -31:21:38.7: 12.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:15:52.46 -29:12:22.8: 12.62 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:33:20.58 -31:57:33.0: 12.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:16:12.22 -32:18:43.5: 11.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:18:14.11 -29:11:25.8: 12.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:13:38.89 -29:12:46.3: 11.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:14:10.08 -30:09:16.3: 12.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:33:09.18 -32:15:33.7: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0716 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:27:58.83 -31:21:38.7: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3003 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:15:52.46 -29:12:22.8: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.7484 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:33:20.58 -31:57:33.0: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0863 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:16:12.22 -32:18:43.5: ref_mag=11.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3629 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:13:38.89 -29:12:46.3: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6522 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:18:14.11 -29:11:25.8: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.2185 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:14:10.08 -30:09:16.3: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.3376 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:07:15.79 -37:49:40.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:07:15.79 -37:49:40.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:13:19.88 -29:21:09.6: 9.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:13:19.88 -29:21:09.6: ref_mag=9.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.0559 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:15:08.97 -29:50:00.3: 10.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:35:31.96 -28:43:40.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:16:57.43 -28:33:34.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:15:02.72 -28:39:21.5: 11.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 19:15:08.27 -29:32:05.9: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:30:27.05 -28:47:09.7: 12.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:35:31.96 -28:43:40.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:35:31.96 -28:43:40.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:16:57.43 -28:33:34.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:16:57.43 -28:33:34.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:15:08.97 -29:50:00.3: 10.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:15:08.97 -29:50:00.3: ref_mag=10.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.3200 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:14:58.01 -28:41:58.4: 11.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:38:39.22 -30:02:59.0: 11.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:15:02.72 -28:39:21.5: 11.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:15:02.72 -28:39:21.5: ref_mag=11.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4094 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 19:15:08.27 -29:32:05.9: 14.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:30:27.05 -28:47:09.7: 12.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:30:27.05 -28:47:09.7: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9078 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:38:39.22 -30:02:59.0: 11.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:14:58.01 -28:41:58.4: 12.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:38:39.22 -30:02:59.0: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8644 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:14:58.01 -28:41:58.4: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.1581 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:12:04.54 -34:03:19.2: 11.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:26:34.77 -32:45:47.0: 12.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:34:24.21 -31:10:03.4: 11.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:33:29.42 -31:42:08.5: 11.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:35:36.37 -29:57:09.6: 12.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:27:07.56 -29:31:16.9: 12.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:12:04.54 -34:03:19.2: 11.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:12:04.54 -34:03:19.2: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7855 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:26:34.77 -32:45:47.0: 12.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:34:24.21 -31:10:03.4: 11.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:26:34.77 -32:45:47.0: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.8978 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:34:24.21 -31:10:03.4: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8954 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:33:29.42 -31:42:08.5: 11.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:33:29.42 -31:42:08.5: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9044 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:35:36.37 -29:57:09.6: 12.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:35:36.37 -29:57:09.6: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.0786 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:27:07.56 -29:31:16.9: 12.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:27:07.56 -29:31:16.9: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1546 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:30:48.64 -31:28:27.6: 12.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:28:42.35 -29:52:01.3: 12.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:29:04.43 -29:54:07.4: 12.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:18:04.45 -29:42:37.4: 12.64 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:28:42.35 -29:52:01.3: 12.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:29:04.43 -29:54:07.4: 12.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:28:42.35 -29:52:01.3: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2447 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:30:48.64 -31:28:27.6: 12.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:29:04.43 -29:54:07.4: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2756 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:30:48.64 -31:28:27.6: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9860 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:18:04.45 -29:42:37.4: 12.76 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:18:04.45 -29:42:37.4: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.4862 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:15:27.62 -31:40:12.5: 13.75 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:15:27.62 -31:40:12.5: 13.89 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:15:27.62 -31:40:12.5: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=12.6325 delta=1.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:35:32.24 -36:48:52.0: 10.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:58:52.11 -33:22:24.3: 13.43 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:35:32.24 -36:48:52.0: 10.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:35:32.24 -36:48:52.0: ref_mag=10.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=9.9613 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:58:52.11 -33:22:24.3: 13.18 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:58:52.11 -33:22:24.3: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=11.8617 delta=1.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:40:23.68 -37:35:24.5: 11.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:25:48.61 -35:25:18.8: 13.11 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:55:24.59 -32:21:45.1: 12.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:40:23.68 -37:35:24.5: 11.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:40:23.68 -37:35:24.5: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.7793 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:25:48.61 -35:25:18.8: 12.90 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:55:24.59 -32:21:45.1: 12.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:25:48.61 -35:25:18.8: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=11.9352 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:55:24.59 -32:21:45.1: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.6011 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:32:23.82 -32:29:21.4: 12.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:32:23.82 -32:29:21.4: 12.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:32:23.82 -32:29:21.4: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=11.8313 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:33:17.06 -38:19:51.1: 12.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:33:17.06 -38:19:51.1: 12.68 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:33:17.06 -38:19:51.1: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.5280 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:23:03.30 -33:11:52.4: 13.31 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:36:06.95 -35:40:26.6: 11.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:23:03.30 -33:11:52.4: 13.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:23:03.30 -33:11:52.4: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.1169 delta=1.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:36:06.95 -35:40:26.6: 11.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:36:06.95 -35:40:26.6: ref_mag=11.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8501 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:47:10.02 -32:03:22.3: 13.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:47:10.02 -32:03:22.3: 13.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:47:10.02 -32:03:22.3: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=11.9817 delta=1.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-44-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1259.fits at 18:18:12.67 -31:08:03.7: 12.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-15-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits at 18:18:12.67 -31:08:03.7: 12.96 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:18:12.67 -31:08:03.7: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=11.8264 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out169043.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08104.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out100345.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out106280.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out15976.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out167945.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24786.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out42546.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77423.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78421.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92302.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167546_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 167546_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:47.48 -32:33:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167549_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 167549_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167552_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 167552_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167553_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 167553_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167555_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 167555_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:29.27 -29:04:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167557_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 167557_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167558_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 167558_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167559_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 167559_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167565_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 167565_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167566_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 167566_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167567_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 167567_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167613_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 167613_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167636_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 167636_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:39.26 -34:06:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167637_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 167637_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167670_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 167670_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167784_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 167784_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:54.27 -33:55:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167828_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 167828_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167834_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 167834_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:59.13 -29:30:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167847_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 167847_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:23.33 -31:18:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167880_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 167880_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:10.00 -33:08:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167914_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 167914_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167945_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 167945_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167998_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 167998_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:44.37 -35:44:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168007_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168007_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:41.33 -30:11:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168084_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168084_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:45.99 -31:23:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168124_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168124_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:41.16 -31:55:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168189_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168189_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168215_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168215_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:28.93 -30:55:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168223_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168223_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:31.95 -36:09:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168233_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168233_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168269_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168269_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168290_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168290_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:12.75 -32:59:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168301_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168301_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:31.07 -33:12:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168326_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168326_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:40.28 -29:15:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168346_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168346_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:38.22 -29:38:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168377_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168377_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168386_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168386_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168389_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168389_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168390_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168390_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168407_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168407_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168408_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168408_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:53.44 -32:26:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168413_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168413_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168470_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168470_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:56.18 -31:59:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168494_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168494_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:08.46 -33:52:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168499_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168499_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:18.75 -28:39:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168518_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168518_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:16.11 -36:22:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168519_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168519_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:14.05 -33:05:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168528_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168528_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:05.40 -28:40:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168530_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168530_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168553_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168553_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168559_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168559_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168570_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168570_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:10.02 -32:20:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168607_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168607_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:37.60 -28:46:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168622_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168622_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:56.97 -29:00:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168655_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168655_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:41.33 -34:21:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168712_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168712_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:34.32 -30:31:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168714_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168714_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168772_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168772_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:28.95 -34:07:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168787_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168787_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:09.93 -34:21:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168910_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168910_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:19.26 -29:28:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168944_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168944_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:06.31 -31:46:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168953_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168953_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:41.05 -31:19:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168954_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168954_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:29.78 -36:07:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168993_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 168993_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:24.53 -29:36:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169017_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 169017_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:30.22 -29:31:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169043_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 169043_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:27.62 -31:40:12.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.294 4048912467909837952 273.86511929910 -31.67077529468 11.5628 10.1862 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.294#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169071_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 169071_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:50.54 -31:29:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169104_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 169104_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:56.50 -36:10:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169141_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 169141_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:33.97 -28:36:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169143_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 169143_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:34.06 -32:07:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169164_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 169164_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:52.99 -30:18:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169203_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 169203_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:42.45 -29:22:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169295_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 169295_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:51.29 -31:11:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169299_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 169299_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:53.30 -32:00:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169303_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 169303_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:08.36 -29:30:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169309_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 169309_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:00:48.26 -30:54:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10711_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 10711_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:28.30 -37:54:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24786_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 24786_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139832_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 139832_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:52.85 -31:33:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16039_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 16039_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:37.42 -37:23:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77423_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 77423_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163613_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 163613_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:49.81 -34:49:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163714_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 163714_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:30.22 -35:42:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163785_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 163785_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:22.30 -34:09:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42352_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 42352_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:34.62 -35:33:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15976_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 15976_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165378_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 165378_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:25.46 -31:17:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42546_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 42546_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102316_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 102316_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:48.32 -31:47:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95124_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 95124_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13009_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 13009_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:57.24 -37:37:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59395_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 59395_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:15.29 -34:15:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13822_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 13822_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:31.70 -37:47:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98628_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 98628_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:09.98 -32:04:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80343_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 80343_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:45.07 -33:04:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116666_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 116666_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:36.22 -29:49:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92302_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 92302_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61248_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 61248_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:56.84 -34:07:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35840_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 35840_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:31.63 -35:59:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04510_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 04510_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:34.72 -38:45:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140069_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 140069_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:44.22 -31:29:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65600_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 65600_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:52.37 -33:52:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163764_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 163764_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:43.08 -35:44:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163645_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 163645_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:53.40 -36:27:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163578_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 163578_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:58.69 -30:28:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08104_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 08104_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105703_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 105703_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:57.24 -31:14:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34622_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 34622_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136013_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 136013_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:57.34 -31:08:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43221_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 43221_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:22.42 -35:12:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146391_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 146391_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.59 -29:04:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119724_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 119724_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:25.38 -29:58:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86252_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 86252_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:29.93 -32:42:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78421_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 78421_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40166_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 40166_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100345_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 100345_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24665_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 24665_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_00-01-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
