This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.1984 2461233.6984 8.89 19:12:10.77 -21:51:51.4
15.33208 -14.15008 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.8 pix
The object was found in VSX13" Gaia DR3 4081170317996488704
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.910 G 19.220 G 0.883260000000
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.8 Flora 1 -0 1 9.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:12:10.77 -21:51:51.4: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:12:10.77 -21:51:51.4: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4081170317996488704,2461233.6984,8.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4081170317996488704 20260712.1984 8.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.1984 2461233.6984 11.56 18:46:28.14 -27:37:09.5
7.49365 -11.20360 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.37 Fides -0 -0 0 11.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:46:28.14 -27:37:09.5: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:46:28.14 -27:37:09.5: 14.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461233.6984,11.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260712.1984 11.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.1984 2461233.6984 11.31 19:15:08.54 -29:32:05.8
8.24719 -17.74170 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia -4 -3 5 11.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:15:08.54 -29:32:05.8: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:15:08.54 -29:32:05.8: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461233.6984,11.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260712.1984 11.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.1984 2461233.6984 12.27 18:58:58.20 -24:37:30.2
11.46874 -12.50842 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.407 Arachne 2 1 2 12.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:58:58.20 -24:37:30.2: 15.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:58:58.20 -24:37:30.2: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461233.6984,12.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260712.1984 12.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.1984 2461233.6984 12.26 19:45:04.70 -21:33:17.1
18.75035 -21.06918 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.182 Elsa 0 0 0 12.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:45:04.70 -21:33:17.1: 15.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:45:04.70 -21:33:17.1: 14.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461233.6984,12.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260712.1984 12.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.1984 2461233.6984 12.90 18:40:57.81 -21:17:43.4
12.72192 -7.33772 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.211 Isolda 1 1 1 12.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:40:57.81 -21:17:43.4: 14.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:40:57.81 -21:17:43.4: 14.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461233.6984,12.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260712.1984 12.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.1984 2461233.6984 11.87 19:41:32.98 -26:40:18.9
13.30300 -22.15988 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 8.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V4025 Sgr
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.240 V Y 1.660 V 2452420.00000 218.150087500000
The object was found in astcheck.7468 Anfimov 171 71 186 16.5 0 -0
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the predicted asteroid brightness, but the matched variable star above likely accounts for this object.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:41:32.98 -26:40:18.9: 13.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:41:32.98 -26:40:18.9: 12.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V4025 Sgr,2461233.6984,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V4025 Sgr 20260712.1984 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
First image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Last image: 2461233.69873942 12.07.2026 04:46:01.086 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9742
Objects passed selection criteria: 9710
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7740.5
Average stars matched: 7676.75 (99.1764 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 119748 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jul 11 21:08:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-146-gb95cfcf3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 12 01:21:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
First image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Last image: 2461233.69873942 12.07.2026 04:46:01.086 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 126
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 81 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 109081
Objects passed selection criteria: 108852
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 86538.2
Average stars matched: 85215.5 (98.4715 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1953328 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jul 11 21:08:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-146-gb95cfcf3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 12 01:30:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461233.69814190
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:05.945 -25:59:08.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:12:05.945 -25:59:08.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0271 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:03.461 -25:59:48.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:12:03.461 -25:59:48.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0133 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:05.945 -25:59:08.32
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:03.461 -25:59:48.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01446 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UQB7GgqtLN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nU0IPU8ZQu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NChY31cAND
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OVwrGu3xHM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.554850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.554850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 9734 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9591 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5364 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9591 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5364 deg
Loaded 13383 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7396 out of 7628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7628 out of 9734 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
2.8 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
2.8 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.1 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.UQB7GgqtLN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=984, bad_region=0, passed=13260
Got 13260 stars (including 12254 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13023 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.634 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.734 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.581 n_q1=250 n_q2=210 n_q3=220 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nU0IPU8ZQu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=677, bad_region=0, passed=9734
Got 9734 stars (including 9047 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9734 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.585 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.705 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.623 n_q1=243 n_q2=199 n_q3=234 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NChY31cAND (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=246, bad_region=0, passed=4101
Got 4101 stars (including 3851 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4101 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3993 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3993 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits N_match=926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=251 n_q2=144 n_q3=284 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.335
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OVwrGu3xHM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=236, bad_region=0, passed=4088
Got 4088 stars (including 3849 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4088 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3986 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 920 stars left (next iteration limit 1013)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits N_match=920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=243 n_q2=147 n_q3=281 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.282
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits sigma_overall=0.575 worst_q_ratio=1.277
ref2=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits sigma_overall=0.593 worst_q_ratio=1.188
new1=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits sigma_overall=0.405 worst_q_ratio=1.335
new2=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits sigma_overall=0.452 worst_q_ratio=1.282
reference average sigma_overall=0.584 worst_q_ratio=1.2325
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.53 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114_astrometric_residuals.png (926 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115_astrometric_residuals.png (920 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:12:10.77 -21:51:51.4: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:12:10.77 -21:51:51.4: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20086.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20086_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 20086_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20164_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 20164_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:58.93 -30:28:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20017_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 20017_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.81 -29:04:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20018_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 20018_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.79 -23:56:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20014_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 20014_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.37 -22:34:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20008_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 20008_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:23.62 -26:20:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03218_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 03218_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.09 -28:51:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:12:10.77 -21:51:51.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:05.945 -25:59:08.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:12:05.945 -25:59:08.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0271 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:03.461 -25:59:48.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:12:03.461 -25:59:48.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0133 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:05.945 -25:59:08.32
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:03.461 -25:59:48.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01446 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aLvPdYDUnm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eiltvVWZl5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZHWNqXvFri
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cayhn5eoc5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.361800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.361800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 111498 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9098 to 297.0880 deg, Dec -31.2696 to -20.5364 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9098 to 297.0880 deg, Dec -31.2696 to -20.5364 deg
Loaded 13436 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9982 out of 11636 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11636 out of 111498 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 116 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.3 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 12.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.aLvPdYDUnm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=13408, bad_region=0, passed=145618
Got 145618 stars (including 131996 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 145618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.772 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.568 n_q1=257 n_q2=216 n_q3=187 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.344
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eiltvVWZl5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=8357, bad_region=1, passed=111486
Got 111486 stars (including 102963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 111486 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109216 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109216 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109216 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.750 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.585 n_q1=260 n_q2=213 n_q3=199 n_q4=278 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.287
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZHWNqXvFri (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1665, bad_region=0, passed=46077
Got 46077 stars (including 44340 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46077 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits N_match=922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=230 n_q2=147 n_q3=282 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.198
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cayhn5eoc5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1561, bad_region=1, passed=45890
Got 45890 stars (including 44252 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45890 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45275 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 921 stars left (next iteration limit 1015)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits N_match=921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=229 n_q2=144 n_q3=287 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.068
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-45-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234842_TTUQ1b1x1_1732378_KPnAR98L/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:12:59.29 -21:57:37.4: 12.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:55:17.86 -20:51:10.2: 11.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:34.15 -27:29:49.5: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:46:28.14 -27:37:09.5: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:15:08.54 -29:32:05.8: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:51:23.75 -21:07:57.3: 11.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:12:59.29 -21:57:37.4: 12.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:12:59.29 -21:57:37.4: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6578 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:55:17.86 -20:51:10.2: 11.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:51:23.75 -21:07:57.3: 11.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:56:34.15 -27:29:49.5: 11.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:46:28.14 -27:37:09.5: 14.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:15:08.54 -29:32:05.8: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:55:17.86 -20:51:10.2: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8097 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:51:23.75 -21:07:57.3: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0448 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:34.15 -27:29:49.5: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5611 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:58:58.20 -24:37:30.2: 15.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:58:58.20 -24:37:30.2: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:28.77 -21:36:59.1: 12.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:45:04.70 -21:33:17.1: 15.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:26:05.74 -21:31:56.2: 12.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:34.78 -21:50:42.5: 12.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:07:28.77 -21:36:59.1: 12.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:45:04.70 -21:33:17.1: 14.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:28.77 -21:36:59.1: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4342 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:26:05.74 -21:31:56.2: 12.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:59:34.78 -21:50:42.5: 12.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:05.74 -21:31:56.2: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4202 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:34.78 -21:50:42.5: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4843 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:06:24.91 -23:14:51.6: 12.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:19:45.07 -22:39:14.1: 12.66 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:40:57.81 -21:17:43.4: 14.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:06:24.91 -23:14:51.6: 12.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:24.91 -23:14:51.6: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6085 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:19:45.07 -22:39:14.1: 12.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:45.07 -22:39:14.1: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7021 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:40:57.81 -21:17:43.4: 14.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:08:49.26 -24:26:01.5: 12.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:49.23 -25:03:33.3: 13.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:08:49.26 -24:26:01.5: 12.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:08:49.26 -24:26:01.5: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7937 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:20:43.17 -23:04:27.2: 12.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:59:49.23 -25:03:33.3: 13.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:49.23 -25:03:33.3: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9641 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:13:44.58 -22:33:40.9: 13.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:20:43.17 -23:04:27.2: 12.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:43.17 -23:04:27.2: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8804 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:13:44.58 -22:33:40.9: 13.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:13:44.58 -22:33:40.9: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0683 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:41:32.98 -26:40:18.9: 13.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:41:32.98 -26:40:18.9: 12.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:41:32.98 -26:40:18.9: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.8714 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:39:51.54 -28:39:18.8: 9.24 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:39:51.54 -28:39:18.8: 9.24 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.24 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:39:51.54 -28:39:18.8: ref_mag=9.24 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=8.4891 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159378.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159401.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159743.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159832.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160161.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56028.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158937_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 158937_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:32.98 -20:54:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158940_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 158940_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158945_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 158945_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:08.89 -22:36:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158946_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 158946_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:20.13 -21:03:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158948_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 158948_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:27.65 -30:09:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158951_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 158951_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:50.76 -27:50:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158953_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 158953_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:06.42 -23:57:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158954_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 158954_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:41.04 -28:19:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158972_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 158972_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:12:10.76 -21:51:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159114_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159114_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:06.25 -22:42:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159136_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159136_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:33.88 -20:55:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159188_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159188_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:38.77 -28:45:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159292_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159292_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:42.98 -27:38:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159343_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159343_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159366_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159366_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:03.51 -30:58:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159378_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 159378_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159395_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159395_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159401_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 159401_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159436_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159436_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159449_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159449_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:27.86 -22:23:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159519_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159519_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:45.68 -24:25:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159607_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159607_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:37.56 -22:17:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159635_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159635_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:33.64 -24:07:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159694_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159694_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:13.64 -23:13:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159703_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159703_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:25.27 -26:18:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159714_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159714_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:12.38 -24:52:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159743_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 159743_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159751_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159751_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:30.50 -25:48:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159779_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159779_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:04.87 -24:22:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159785_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159785_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:20.93 -26:02:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159805_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159805_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:14.40 -24:02:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159827_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159827_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159830_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159830_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:59.42 -23:54:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159832_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 159832_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159850_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159850_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:24.29 -28:14:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159851_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159851_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159894_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159894_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159896_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159896_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:41.50 -21:43:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159914_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159914_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:13.87 -22:39:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159958_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159958_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:35.48 -21:30:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159982_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159982_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:52.05 -23:46:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159987_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 159987_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:38.08 -21:14:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160001_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160001_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:30.13 -20:59:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160003_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160003_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:16.23 -24:20:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160004_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160004_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:42.05 -22:09:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160029_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160029_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:59.95 -21:49:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160047_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160047_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:35.67 -22:18:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160063_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160063_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:46.38 -21:25:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160064_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160064_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160138_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160138_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:42.43 -26:56:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160146_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160146_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:27.43 -21:19:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160148_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160148_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:56.18 -24:07:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160156_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160156_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160159_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160159_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:21.61 -21:14:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160161_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 160161_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160166_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160166_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:24.82 -23:15:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160168_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160168_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:53.73 -22:42:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160192_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160192_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:29.34 -22:20:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160223_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160223_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:38.72 -21:52:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160308_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160308_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:07.67 -21:05:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160311_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160311_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:41.43 -20:45:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160314_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160314_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:47.85 -24:01:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160319_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160319_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:34.79 -24:35:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160374_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160374_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:11.34 -27:20:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160393_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160393_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:44.56 -24:21:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160397_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160397_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160408_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160408_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:10.40 -27:42:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160412_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160412_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:36.09 -28:26:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160442_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160442_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:25.35 -27:13:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160457_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160457_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:39.46 -25:18:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160464_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160464_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160468_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160468_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:34.89 -23:20:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160497_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160497_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:54.21 -21:39:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160537_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160537_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160547_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160547_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:31.31 -21:43:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160582_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160582_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160638_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160638_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:55.79 -21:34:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160643_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 160643_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:37.48 -25:02:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68174_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 68174_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:37:02.50 -25:51:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138340_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 138340_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:34.54 -23:48:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49206_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 49206_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:44.69 -27:19:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155975_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 155975_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:13.48 -28:02:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156084_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 156084_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:49.23 -28:37:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156203_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 156203_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:29.17 -26:25:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156438_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 156438_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:05.98 -28:00:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26547_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 26547_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:08.88 -28:46:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91787_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 91787_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:39.14 -24:13:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51402_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 51402_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:41.72 -26:56:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12242_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 12242_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:44.02 -29:54:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66141_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 66141_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:24.00 -26:10:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80329_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 80329_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:18.91 -25:10:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75953_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 75953_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:15.43 -25:15:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157359_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 157359_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:49.05 -27:20:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133962_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 133962_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:29.53 -23:19:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22400_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 22400_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.84 -29:04:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56028_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 56028_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156402_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 156402_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:16.35 -28:17:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39487_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 39487_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:04.47 -27:50:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156209_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 156209_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:50.46 -23:55:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156128_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 156128_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:57.84 -28:06:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136052_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 136052_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:19.54 -23:35:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122726_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 122726_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:46.14 -22:32:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155870_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 155870_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:58.28 -22:07:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136535_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 136535_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:34.37 -23:36:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136846_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 136846_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:46.96 -23:43:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12580_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 12580_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:09.67 -30:02:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32093_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 32093_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:32.33 -28:24:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48729_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 48729_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:32.27 -27:16:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123580_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 123580_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.37 -22:34:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27419_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 27419_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.08 -28:51:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39042_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 39042_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:20.46 -27:49:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84726_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 84726_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:08.73 -24:44:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26693_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 26693_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51151_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 51151_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:10.62 -26:58:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73035_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 73035_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:55.45 -25:35:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98259_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 98259_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-46-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
