This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 11.1763 2461232.6763 8.80 19:13:19.68 -21:46:36.7
15.52595 -14.35838 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.8 Flora 0 -1 1 9.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:13:19.68 -21:46:36.7: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:13:19.68 -21:46:36.7: 14.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461232.6763,8.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260711.1763 8.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 11.1763 2461232.6763 11.06 19:07:42.51 -27:35:02.8
9.48516 -15.49166 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis -1 1 1 11.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:42.51 -27:35:02.8: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:07:42.51 -27:35:02.8: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461232.6763,11.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260711.1763 11.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 11.1763 2461232.6763 11.23 19:16:03.58 -29:26:54.2
8.40897 -17.89538 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia -3 -4 5 11.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:16:03.58 -29:26:54.2: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:16:03.58 -29:26:54.2: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461232.6763,11.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260711.1763 11.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 11.1763 2461232.6763 11.46 18:47:28.68 -27:36:23.6
7.60124 -11.40106 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.1 pix
The object was found in VSX12" Gaia DR3 4072119932876564224
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.070 G 16.440 G 0.429444000000 G
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.37 Fides -1 0 1 11.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:47:28.68 -27:36:23.6: 14.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:47:28.68 -27:36:23.6: 14.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4072119932876564224,2461232.6763,11.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4072119932876564224 20260711.1763 11.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 11.1763 2461232.6763 12.23 19:00:00.63 -24:39:10.2
11.54246 -12.73535 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.407 Arachne 4 1 4 12.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:00:00.63 -24:39:10.2: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:00:00.63 -24:39:10.2: 14.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461232.6763,12.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260711.1763 12.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 11.1763 2461232.6763 13.29 19:14:50.25 -25:34:00.5
12.06069 -16.17748 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2013 Tucapel -0 2 2 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:14:50.25 -25:34:00.5: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:14:50.25 -25:34:00.5: 15.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461232.6763,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260711.1763 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 11.1763 2461232.6763 13.43 19:11:31.87 -26:58:52.4
10.40467 -16.04101 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.503 Evelyn -0 1 1 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:11:31.87 -26:58:52.4: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:11:31.87 -26:58:52.4: 14.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461232.6763,13.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260711.1763 13.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 11.1763 2461232.6763 13.57 19:29:14.83 -22:33:08.0
16.29747 -18.05105 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.468 Lina -0 1 1 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:29:14.83 -22:33:08.0: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:29:14.83 -22:33:08.0: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461232.6763,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260711.1763 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 11.1763 2461232.6763 12.51 18:45:25.10 -28:35:45.2
6.49071 -11.40395 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.488 Kreusa -1 1 2 12.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:45:25.10 -28:35:45.2: 14.67 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:45:25.10 -28:35:45.2: 14.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.31
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461232.6763,12.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260711.1763 12.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
First image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Last image: 2461232.67659148 11.07.2026 04:14:07.504 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7967
Objects passed selection criteria: 7964
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7809
Average stars matched: 7790 (99.7567 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115444 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 10 19:09:57 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-143-g13f85f26
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 10 23:25:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
First image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Last image: 2461232.67659148 11.07.2026 04:14:07.504 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 183
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 116 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 101367
Objects passed selection criteria: 101205
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 96995.2
Average stars matched: 95870.5 (98.8404 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2252924 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 10 19:09:57 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-143-g13f85f26
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 10 23:32:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461232.67606861
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.312 -26:00:06.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:12:01.312 -26:00:06.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0040 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:59.059 -25:59:27.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:11:59.059 -25:59:27.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0122 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:01.312 -26:00:06.35
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:59.059 -25:59:27.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01371 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sTCZ1oMIgf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bAPySgt9d6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qV834Nkwuu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7bfyDzZYNs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.547700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.547700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 9734 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9591 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5364 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9591 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5364 deg
Loaded 13383 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7396 out of 7628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7628 out of 9734 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.1 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.sTCZ1oMIgf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=984, bad_region=2274, passed=13260
Got 13260 stars (including 10138 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11165 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.693 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.513 n_q1=321 n_q2=159 n_q3=272 n_q4=187 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.371
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bAPySgt9d6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=677, bad_region=1820, passed=9734
Got 9734 stars (including 7369 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9734 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.714 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.476 n_q1=309 n_q2=152 n_q3=284 n_q4=194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.286
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qV834Nkwuu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=529, bad_region=1285, passed=7555
Got 7555 stars (including 5805 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7555 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6399 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.622 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.789 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.546 n_q1=313 n_q2=154 n_q3=281 n_q4=184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.269
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7bfyDzZYNs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=537, bad_region=1279, passed=7546
Got 7546 stars (including 5798 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7546 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.611 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.597 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.757 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.535 n_q1=320 n_q2=152 n_q3=281 n_q4=182 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.240
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits sigma_overall=0.506 worst_q_ratio=1.371
ref2=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits sigma_overall=0.555 worst_q_ratio=1.286
new1=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits sigma_overall=0.622 worst_q_ratio=1.269
new2=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits sigma_overall=0.611 worst_q_ratio=1.240
reference average sigma_overall=0.5305 worst_q_ratio=1.3285
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080_astrometric_residuals.png (932 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.53 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081_astrometric_residuals.png (935 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.55 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-13-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_231922_TTUQ2b1x1_2416770_BpUdxOtk/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:13:19.68 -21:46:36.7: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:13:19.68 -21:46:36.7: 14.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20057.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20057_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 20057_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20063_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 20063_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:49.32 -28:37:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20064_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 20064_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:04.49 -27:50:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20012_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 20012_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.45 -22:34:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03218_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 03218_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.14 -28:51:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20014_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 20014_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.81 -23:56:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20013_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 20013_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158618_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158618_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158640_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158640_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158642_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158642_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158658_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158658_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158671_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158671_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158678_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158678_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158679_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158679_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158685_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158685_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158690_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158690_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158696_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158696_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158702_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158702_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158703_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158703_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:58.46 -22:07:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158725_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158725_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158727_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158727_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:13.13 -23:27:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158731_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158731_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158733_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158733_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158735_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158735_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158736_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158736_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158738_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158738_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158742_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158742_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158744_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158744_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158745_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158745_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158751_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158751_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158753_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158753_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:35.77 -27:56:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158755_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158755_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158758_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158758_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158763_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158763_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158767_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158767_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158768_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158768_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158773_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158773_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158781_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158781_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:19.68 -21:46:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158789_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 158789_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158791_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 158791_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158792_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 158792_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158798_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158798_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158804_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158804_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:39.90 -22:22:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158817_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 158817_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158823_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158823_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158841_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158841_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158847_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158847_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158850_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158850_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:59.42 -23:54:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158853_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158853_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:43.89 -27:03:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158855_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158855_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158861_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158861_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:20.80 -26:02:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158867_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158867_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158873_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158873_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:33.64 -24:07:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158875_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158875_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:16.30 -24:20:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158877_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158877_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:24:28.18 -22:37:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158883_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158883_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:30.60 -25:48:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158884_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158884_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:40.25 -22:06:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158887_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158887_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158889_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158889_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:08.62 -29:30:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158894_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158894_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158898_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158898_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:35.82 -23:14:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158899_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158899_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:42.36 -26:56:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158902_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158902_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158911_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158911_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:52.09 -23:46:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158913_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158913_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:36.11 -22:43:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158916_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158916_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158922_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158922_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:44.46 -22:33:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158927_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158927_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:25.28 -27:13:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158932_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158932_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:37.30 -22:27:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158935_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158935_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:11.29 -27:20:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158938_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158938_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:39.42 -25:18:48.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.29)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.103 4073443985383830528 280.91403962966 -25.31357355326 13.4477 11.9304 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.103#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158953_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158953_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158956_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 158956_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158959_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158959_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158963_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 158963_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158967_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158967_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158983_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158983_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:38.27 -23:54:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158988_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158988_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:49.55 -23:34:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158989_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 158989_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159018_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159018_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159019_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159019_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:29.38 -22:20:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159041_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159041_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159046_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159046_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159047_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159047_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159048_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159048_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:34.77 -23:20:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159049_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159049_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159054_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 159054_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159057_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159057_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159063_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159063_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159065_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159065_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159075_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159075_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159079_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159079_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159082_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159082_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:44.63 -24:21:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159101_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159101_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159102_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159102_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159106_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159106_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159120_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159120_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159127_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159127_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159135_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159135_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159139_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159139_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159145_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159145_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159153_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159153_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159167_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159167_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159181_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159181_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159187_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159187_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159249_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159249_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159260_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159260_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159267_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159267_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159273_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159273_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159305_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159305_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159308_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159308_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159332_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 159332_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136846_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 136846_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:46.91 -23:43:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156123_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 156123_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:49.32 -28:37:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73035_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 73035_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:55.27 -25:35:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29697_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 29697_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80329_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 80329_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:18.78 -25:10:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157186_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 157186_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:48.99 -27:20:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22400_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 22400_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.86 -29:04:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156398_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 156398_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:05.92 -28:00:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138340_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 138340_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:34.51 -23:48:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156214_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 156214_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:50.43 -23:55:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156208_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 156208_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:29.25 -26:24:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39487_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 39487_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:04.48 -27:50:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133962_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 133962_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:29.54 -23:19:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123580_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 123580_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.44 -22:34:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27419_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 27419_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.17 -28:51:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49206_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 49206_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_23-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
