Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461231.8939,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260710.3939 13.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Cet-09-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-09-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 511423 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 511423 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits_preview.png'
Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits

renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits_preview.png'
Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1834.8518
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 518.6785
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3151.3770
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 736.0352
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3168.9680
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 713.1124
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.71751
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.032
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 23.25 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 29.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-10T04:26:36.2621336' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-10T09:26:36.2621336' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61231.3934752545 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-10T09:26:46.1623798' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61231.3935898379 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 359.997548920604 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -17.9994734844464 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 29.9444444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 144.124444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.99759050385749 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20420 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20420 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.25 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.25 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 10.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 31.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.59 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 29.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 33.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 25.602048 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 20.50164 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits :)
Spent 0.655779 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 33794.829350
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21727.0, right_median=27156.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 23.25 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 29.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-10T04:27:23.6542999' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-10T09:27:23.6542999' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61231.3940237733 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-10T09:27:33.5584404' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61231.3941384028 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 359.997548840296 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -17.9994735134912 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 30.0419444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 144.313888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.99175568212849 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20420 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20420 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.25 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.25 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 10.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 31.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.59 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 29.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 33.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 25.602048 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 20.50164 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits :)
Spent 0.623778 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 33794.829350
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21727.0, right_median=27156.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits

fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461231.89359100
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits'
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits'
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits'
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:51.603 -18:00:47.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.471 -17:59:54.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:51.603 -18:00:47.44
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.471 -17:59:54.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0381 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:02.986 -17:59:32.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:51.603 -18:00:47.44
Second-epoch image center 00:00:02.986 -17:59:32.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0496 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:00.471 -17:59:54.55
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:02.986 -17:59:32.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01166 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zKvGOuD6xE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1s3waeQ7w6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VZArKsKPhY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8XYNFJvRgY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 2923 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0041 to 359.9882 deg, Dec -23.2792 to -12.6278 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0041 to 359.9882 deg, Dec -23.2792 to -12.6278 deg
Loaded 191265 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2374 out of 2407 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2407 out of 2923 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.455500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.455500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.26
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 2923 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0041 to 359.9882 deg, Dec -23.2792 to -12.6278 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0041 to 359.9882 deg, Dec -23.2792 to -12.6278 deg
Loaded 191265 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2374 out of 2407 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2407 out of 2923 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 2935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0041 to 359.9884 deg, Dec -23.2759 to -12.6277 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0041 to 359.9884 deg, Dec -23.2759 to -12.6277 deg
Loaded 191198 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2383 out of 2420 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2420 out of 2935 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
2.4 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
14.2 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zKvGOuD6xE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=194, bad_region=569, passed=2923
Got 2923 stars (including 2185 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2923 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5851 through 0 to 8.4398, gap 8.4398 to 351.5851
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5849 through 0 to 8.4399, gap 8.4399 to 351.5849
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=301 n_q2=169 n_q3=312 n_q4=172 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.158
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1s3waeQ7w6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=193, bad_region=565, passed=2935
Got 2935 stars (including 2202 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2935 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5851 through 0 to 8.4397, gap 8.4397 to 351.5851
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5849 through 0 to 8.4399, gap 8.4399 to 351.5849
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=303 n_q2=169 n_q3=316 n_q4=166 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.170
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VZArKsKPhY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=185, bad_region=430, passed=2151
Got 2151 stars (including 1562 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2151 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5850 through 0 to 8.4293, gap 8.4293 to 351.5850
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5847 through 0 to 8.4294, gap 8.4294 to 351.5847
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1742 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1742 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.352 n_q1=312 n_q2=173 n_q3=298 n_q4=170 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.165
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8XYNFJvRgY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=175, bad_region=422, passed=2099
Got 2099 stars (including 1529 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2099 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5851 through 0 to 8.4406, gap 8.4406 to 351.5851
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1699 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5848 through 0 to 8.4407, gap 8.4407 to 351.5848
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1698 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=319 n_q2=175 n_q3=280 n_q4=177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits sigma_overall=0.348 worst_q_ratio=1.158
ref2=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits sigma_overall=0.357 worst_q_ratio=1.170
new1=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits sigma_overall=0.357 worst_q_ratio=1.165
new2=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits sigma_overall=0.384 worst_q_ratio=1.175
reference average sigma_overall=0.3525 worst_q_ratio=1.164
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411_astrometric_residuals.png (951 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:51.603 -18:00:47.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.471 -17:59:54.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:51.603 -18:00:47.44
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.471 -17:59:54.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0381 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:02.986 -17:59:32.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:51.603 -18:00:47.44
Second-epoch image center 00:00:02.986 -17:59:32.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0496 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:00.471 -17:59:54.55
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:02.986 -17:59:32.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01166 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hIwvZn0xsY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RcWy2W9ODq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YRQGIFFMMn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NGaKPqtOhi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16186 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0007 to 359.9989 deg, Dec -23.2878 to -12.6015 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0007 to 359.9989 deg, Dec -23.2878 to -12.6015 deg
Loaded 191831 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3383 out of 3487 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3487 out of 16186 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.311900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.311900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.90
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.41
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16186 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0007 to 359.9989 deg, Dec -23.2878 to -12.6015 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0007 to 359.9989 deg, Dec -23.2878 to -12.6015 deg
Loaded 191831 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3383 out of 3487 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3487 out of 16186 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 16078 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0007 to 359.9986 deg, Dec -23.2782 to -12.5860 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0007 to 359.9986 deg, Dec -23.2782 to -12.5860 deg
Loaded 191949 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3385 out of 3492 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3492 out of 16078 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
2.3 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
14.4 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.hIwvZn0xsY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=543, bad_region=2286, passed=16184
Got 16184 stars (including 13482 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16184 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5849 through 0 to 8.4428, gap 8.4428 to 351.5849
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5848 through 0 to 8.4430, gap 8.4430 to 351.5848
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=305 n_q2=162 n_q3=311 n_q4=173 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RcWy2W9ODq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=502, bad_region=2228, passed=16076
Got 16076 stars (including 13434 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5849 through 0 to 8.4397, gap 8.4397 to 351.5849
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14067 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5848 through 0 to 8.4399, gap 8.4399 to 351.5848
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=306 n_q2=164 n_q3=314 n_q4=169 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.122
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YRQGIFFMMn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=375, bad_region=2127, passed=13735
Got 13735 stars (including 11307 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13735 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5847 through 0 to 8.4401, gap 8.4401 to 351.5847
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5846 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5846
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.347 n_q1=314 n_q2=172 n_q3=292 n_q4=171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NGaKPqtOhi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=389, bad_region=2144, passed=13526
Got 13526 stars (including 11081 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13526 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5845 through 0 to 8.4445, gap 8.4445 to 351.5845
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11547 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5843 through 0 to 8.4446, gap 8.4446 to 351.5843
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11547 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11535 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=321 n_q2=174 n_q3=273 n_q4=180 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.211
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 00:12:52.11 -19:41:30.5: 14.38 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 00:16:15.99 -17:36:12.9: 14.62 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 00:09:35.82 -21:22:10.3: 12.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 00:12:12.76 -19:35:31.6: 14.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 00:12:35.45 -17:15:09.5: 12.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 00:16:39.01 -21:07:26.9: 14.08 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 00:13:45.72 -18:28:09.2: 14.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-48-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 23:37:03.92 -21:39:05.2: 13.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 00:09:35.82 -21:22:10.3: 12.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 00:13:45.72 -18:28:09.2: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 23:37:03.92 -21:39:05.2: 13.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 00:12:12.76 -19:35:31.6: 14.19 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 00:16:39.01 -21:07:26.9: 14.23 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:09:35.82 -21:22:10.3: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0748 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:03.92 -21:39:05.2: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6794 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:16:39.01 -21:07:26.9: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6650 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:12:12.76 -19:35:31.6: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8611 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 00:12:52.11 -19:41:30.5: 14.32 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 00:12:35.45 -17:15:09.5: 13.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-49-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 00:16:15.99 -17:36:12.9: 14.47 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:12:52.11 -19:41:30.5: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8872 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:12:35.45 -17:15:09.5: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5007 delta=-0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:16:15.99 -17:36:12.9: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.7036 delta=0.83 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21070.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21002_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411
The candidate 21002_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 10.39359 | 2461231.89359 | 13.51 | 00:12:35.44 -17:15:09.9 | 6609 3618 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 10.39414 | 2461231.89414 | 13.49 | 00:12:35.46 -17:15:09.1 | 6603 3614 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21034_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411
The candidate 21034_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 10.39359 | 2461231.89359 | 13.04 | 00:09:35.80 -21:22:11.0 | 6125 1136 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 10.39414 | 2461231.89414 | 13.11 | 00:09:35.84 -21:22:09.7 | 6120 1133 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21054_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411
The candidate 21054_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 10.39359 | 2461231.89359 | 13.66 | 00:16:38.92 -21:07:26.2 | 7128 1257 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 10.39414 | 2461231.89414 | 13.67 | 00:16:39.09 -21:07:27.6 | 7122 1253 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21064_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411
The candidate 21064_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 10.39359 | 2461231.89359 | 13.73 | 23:37:03.96 -21:39:04.7 | 1529 0946 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 10.39414 | 2461231.89414 | 13.64 | 23:37:03.88 -21:39:05.6 | 1523 0942 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21069_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411
The candidate 21069_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 10.39359 | 2461231.89359 | 13.78 | 00:12:52.12 -19:41:30.1 | 6613 2142 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 10.39414 | 2461231.89414 | 14.04 | 00:12:52.11 -19:41:30.9 | 6607 2138 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21070_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411
Preparing report for the candidate 21070_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21071_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411
The candidate 21071_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 10.39359 | 2461231.89359 | 13.81 | 00:12:12.69 -19:35:31.6 | 6520 2204 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 10.39414 | 2461231.89414 | 13.91 | 00:12:12.83 -19:35:31.6 | 6515 2201 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21079_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411
The candidate 21079_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 10.39359 | 2461231.89359 | 13.80 | 00:16:16.02 -17:36:13.2 | 7135 3392 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-26-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 10.39414 | 2461231.89414 | 13.65 | 00:16:15.97 -17:36:12.5 | 7129 3388 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045702_TTUQ2b1x1_2670375_2OSVRHLD/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_04-27-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits |
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:13:45.72 -18:28:09.2
########### Completed Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
00:13:45.72 -18:28:09.2
###################################################################################
00:13:45.72 -18:28:09.2 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461231.89359100 -observatory V36
07:32:10.10 +17:07:55.4 Mercury (5.1mag)
10:11:49.73 +12:39:51.9 Venus (-4.1mag)
04:24:18.00 +21:25:32.0 Mars (1.3mag)
08:16:42.93 +20:11:21.6 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:55:51.19 +03:20:29.9 Saturn (0.7mag)
04:07:14.54 +20:45:04.7 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:17:01.49 +00:20:41.0 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:30:54.70 -23:18:01.8 Pluto (14.4mag)
03:14:22.28 +22:36:32.6 Moon (-9.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jul 10 06:36 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461231.89359100:
08:16:50.12 +20:10:56.4 Io (6.1mag)
08:16:46.54 +20:11:10.0 Europa (6.3mag)
08:17:00.15 +20:10:19.2 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:17:10.73 +20:09:38.8 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:15:14.30 +19:55:32.3 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:16:43.38 +20:11:20.7 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:14:35.63 +20:00:01.2 Elara (17.6mag)
08:20:15.23 +20:05:30.4 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:21:40.63 +20:16:27.0 Carme (19.0mag)
00:55:41.16 +03:20:20.2 Titan (8.5mag)
00:55:45.95 +03:20:32.1 Rhea (9.8mag)
00:55:20.42 +03:19:38.2 Iapetus (11.2mag)
00:56:00.26 +03:20:49.2 Hyperion (14.5mag)
00:55:51.85 +03:17:43.3 Phoebe (16.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 10 06:36 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461231.89359100:
17:46:01.75 -32:57:29.8 JWST
16:21:16.55 +47:25:31.3 Chandra
05:01:31.02 +47:47:50.5 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 10 06:36 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461231.89359100 -observatory V36
02:36:19.77 +14:26:00.1 17.9mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:17:54.37 -34:21:49.5 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:25:43.03 -68:08:25.4 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:00:49.26 +32:26:51.7 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:03:06.23 +16:02:53.6 18.0mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
01:48:02.68 +08:18:22.0 15.4mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:59:30.37 +32:17:08.0 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:12:26.87 +26:55:33.5 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:55:33.12 +29:46:44.5 16.8mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:09:45.75 +05:00:00.2 17.8mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:07:11.53 +21:17:32.2 18.0mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:11:34.96 -11:23:19.3 17.7mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:49:11.03 +67:37:16.1 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
16:30:48.11 -10:04:57.3 13.9mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:00:43.42 +65:42:38.5 17.9mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:32:52.22 +30:00:19.9 14.6mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:16:18.34 +15:19:46.1 17.5mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:41:15.36 +39:24:04.8 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:47:32.37 +46:00:34.7 17.8mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
04:49:40.74 -13:47:38.4 15.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:34:36.51 +29:03:46.6 18.0mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:14:22.19 -12:53:36.0 16.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:56:08.42 +22:26:06.3 17.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:44:37.85 +03:56:09.8 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:51:49.94 +79:07:16.1 17.4mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:46:19.25 +45:14:30.5 16.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:25:32.28 +04:33:06.0 16.9mag A/2026 E1
21:19:05.85 -15:05:27.8 7.3mag 10P/Tempel
11:13:28.48 -01:53:20.2 16.1mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:00:13.95 +29:33:28.1 17.8mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
10:08:09.85 +13:59:53.6 17.0mag 63P/Wild
00:48:22.83 -05:05:33.4 15.5mag 65P/Gunn
08:27:05.02 +34:13:01.0 17.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
04:27:29.93 +20:10:51.9 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
02:22:24.11 +10:36:55.4 16.2mag 88P/Howell
06:35:39.30 +30:31:57.1 15.7mag 93P/Lovas
04:21:08.02 +31:07:30.0 16.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
08:08:47.78 +30:41:56.4 15.2mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:48:12.56 +01:10:12.2 16.8mag 124P/Mrkos
04:51:47.70 +20:48:51.3 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
05:36:20.05 +19:42:49.8 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
00:01:33.39 +02:56:12.9 17.9mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
07:13:43.01 +17:00:42.9 15.5mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:16:52.03 -21:06:09.0 15.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
05:33:12.78 +33:57:28.3 15.3mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:04:21.97 +15:06:26.1 14.7mag 169P/NEAT
01:41:07.73 +07:36:12.5 17.7mag 220P/McNaught
16:35:57.71 -08:23:12.8 17.0mag 235P/LINEAR
08:45:22.42 +33:17:44.5 17.9mag 240P/NEAT
20:42:09.26 -49:34:47.3 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
01:59:25.28 +12:06:51.2 15.7mag 260P/McNaught
05:37:21.11 +36:50:47.2 17.4mag 295P/LINEAR
15:06:36.63 +06:03:11.7 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski
08:34:38.46 +19:40:30.4 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:51:49.93 +39:12:46.0 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jul 10 06:36 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.47 -16:06:07.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.24 16.32
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 2026-07-5.01 16.82
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 2026-07-5.01 16.82
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 10 06:36 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 10 06:36 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
11:03:23.326 +12:49:15.53 AT 2026sqk 2026-07-06.95 17.816
02:23:45.306 -56:30:54.13 AT 2026sqj 2026-07-07.14 18.706
20:05:32.749 -40:04:20.18 AT 2026sqi 2026-07-07.00 19.025
13:27:09.068 +62:50:19.22 AT 2026sqh 2026-07-06.32 19.347
10:36:21.258 +13:42:31.91 AT 2026sqg 2026-07-06.96 17.376
10:38:47.961 +53:30:34.10 SN 2026sqf 2026-07-08.25 12.9
13:40:20.447 +40:38:15.61 AT 2026sqe 2026-07-03.20 20.3209
20:26:11.475 -21:05:59.62 AT 2026sqd 2026-07-07.33 20.2909
20:38:05.960 -15:39:19.94 AT 2026sqc 2026-07-07.33 22.2834
21:50:20.218 -14:25:11.02 AT 2026sqb 2026-07-07.39 21.5547
20:32:17.644 -16:37:51.49 AT 2026sqa 2026-07-07.33 21.6569
20:38:02.144 -16:39:15.94 AT 2026spz 2026-07-07.33 22.7762
20:36:24.191 -15:13:43.37 AT 2026spy 2026-07-07.33 22.1739
20:41:10.988 -25:49:45.49 AT 2026spx 2026-07-07.33 22.8645
21:17:15.336 -23:31:53.39 AT 2026spw 2026-07-07.32 21.9459
20:27:45.431 -19:59:58.81 AT 2026spv 2026-07-07.33 21.6485
21:55:34.604 -14:11:57.66 AT 2026spu 2026-07-07.39 23.0585
21:10:34.181 -22:59:24.76 AT 2026spt 2026-07-07.32 22.3526
21:05:55.405 -19:04:02.26 AT 2026sps 2026-07-07.32 21.4424
20:59:14.423 -27:33:25.12 AT 2026spr 2026-07-07.32 23.4151
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jul 10 06:36 tns_transients_list.txt