This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.3713 2461231.8713 9.36 20:22:33.27 -03:50:20.1
40.15341 -21.98360 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3 Juno -0 -1 1 9.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:22:33.27 -03:50:20.1: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:22:33.27 -03:50:20.1: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461231.8713,9.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260710.3713 9.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.3713 2461231.8713 13.47 20:26:14.86 -01:09:06.2
43.17170 -21.52187 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.365 Corduba 0 -0 0 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:26:14.86 -01:09:06.2: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:26:14.86 -01:09:06.2: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461231.8713,13.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260710.3713 13.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.3713 2461231.8713 13.61 20:21:35.87 +00:43:06.2
44.31510 -19.59768 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.1" and 9.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" V0595 Aql
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.000 V < 16.300 V 2453490.00000 242.500000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:21:35.87 +00:43:06.2: 14.56 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:21:35.87 +00:43:06.2: 14.69 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0595 Aql,2461231.8713,13.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0595 Aql 20260710.3713 13.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.87295765 17.06.2026 08:56:53.541 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
First image: 2461208.87295765 17.06.2026 08:56:53.541 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Last image: 2461231.87164370 10.07.2026 08:55:00.016 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14519
Objects passed selection criteria: 14468
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11316
Average stars matched: 10419.8 (92.0798 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118396 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 8 15:05:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-141-gc31ee76a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 10 06:12:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.87295765 17.06.2026 08:56:53.541 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
First image: 2461208.87295765 17.06.2026 08:56:53.541 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Last image: 2461231.87164370 10.07.2026 08:55:00.016 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 75
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 98 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 104285
Objects passed selection criteria: 104011
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 81408
Average stars matched: 75222.2 (92.4015 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1881172 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 8 15:05:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-141-gc31ee76a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 10 06:17:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461231.87092941
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits'
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:20.091 -02:01:00.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.232 -02:00:00.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:20.091 -02:01:00.12
Second-epoch image center 20:34:17.232 -02:00:00.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0205 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:20.287 -02:00:30.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:20.091 -02:01:00.12
Second-epoch image center 20:34:20.287 -02:00:30.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0082 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:17.232 -02:00:00.13
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:20.287 -02:00:30.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01528 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Sj7ugHvPq5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YOE60Uk3j5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ygwuDnmSpE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iPtOxsiOsR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 15987 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7263 to 316.4697 deg, Dec -7.2832 to +3.2522 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7263 to 316.4697 deg, Dec -7.2832 to 3.2522 deg
Loaded 10826 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8905 out of 9393 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9393 out of 15987 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.749100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.749100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.03
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.03
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 15987 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7263 to 316.4697 deg, Dec -7.2832 to +3.2522 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7263 to 316.4697 deg, Dec -7.2832 to 3.2522 deg
Loaded 10826 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8905 out of 9393 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9393 out of 15987 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 16210 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7275 to 316.4697 deg, Dec -7.2713 to +3.2585 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7275 to 316.4697 deg, Dec -7.2713 to 3.2585 deg
Loaded 10824 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8956 out of 9440 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9440 out of 16210 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
2.3 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
2.7 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
2.7 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
15.0 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Sj7ugHvPq5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1068, bad_region=3250, passed=15983
Got 15983 stars (including 11841 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15983 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=298 n_q2=174 n_q3=307 n_q4=180 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YOE60Uk3j5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1087, bad_region=3273, passed=16210
Got 16210 stars (including 12043 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16210 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13259 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.455 n_q1=293 n_q2=175 n_q3=309 n_q4=183 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.132
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ygwuDnmSpE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=732, bad_region=2752, passed=12737
Got 12737 stars (including 9463 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12737 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.641 n_q1=288 n_q2=201 n_q3=265 n_q4=186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.261
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iPtOxsiOsR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=775, bad_region=2797, passed=12725
Got 12725 stars (including 9384 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12725 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10274 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10275 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10275 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.670 n_q1=289 n_q2=205 n_q3=263 n_q4=185 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.273
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits sigma_overall=0.462 worst_q_ratio=1.088
ref2=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits sigma_overall=0.446 worst_q_ratio=1.132
new1=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits sigma_overall=0.508 worst_q_ratio=1.261
new2=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits sigma_overall=0.526 worst_q_ratio=1.273
reference average sigma_overall=0.454 worst_q_ratio=1.11
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376_astrometric_residuals.png (940 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377_astrometric_residuals.png (942 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:29:57.83 -02:04:26.4: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:22:33.27 -03:50:20.1: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:29:57.83 -02:04:26.4: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:57.83 -02:04:26.4: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0022 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:22:33.27 -03:50:20.1: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21062.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21062_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
Preparing report for the candidate 21062_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23009_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 23009_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12086_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 12086_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:54.95 +00:56:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12787_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 12787_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:17.87 +01:19:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11955_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 11955_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:21.61 +00:50:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:22:33.27 -03:50:20.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:20.091 -02:01:00.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.232 -02:00:00.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:20.091 -02:01:00.12
Second-epoch image center 20:34:17.232 -02:00:00.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0205 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:20.287 -02:00:30.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:20.091 -02:01:00.12
Second-epoch image center 20:34:20.287 -02:00:30.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0082 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:17.232 -02:00:00.13
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:20.287 -02:00:30.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01528 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C7dcUkKOHO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7kE5TRS1kC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1IWKL7RAiy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xpJw54iHSk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 115005 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7252 to 316.4716 deg, Dec -7.2838 to +3.2545 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7252 to 316.4716 deg, Dec -7.2838 to 3.2545 deg
Loaded 10835 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8003 out of 9773 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9773 out of 115005 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.603200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.603200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 115005 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7252 to 316.4716 deg, Dec -7.2838 to +3.2545 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7252 to 316.4716 deg, Dec -7.2838 to 3.2545 deg
Loaded 10835 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8003 out of 9773 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9773 out of 115005 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 114712 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7269 to 316.4721 deg, Dec -7.2778 to +3.2610 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7269 to 316.4721 deg, Dec -7.2778 to 3.2610 deg
Loaded 10832 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8022 out of 9772 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9772 out of 114712 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 52 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
2.2 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
2.6 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
15.2 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.C7dcUkKOHO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=9720, bad_region=15684, passed=114977
Got 114977 stars (including 90656 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 114977 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.429 n_q1=295 n_q2=183 n_q3=287 n_q4=190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7kE5TRS1kC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=9744, bad_region=15348, passed=114693
Got 114693 stars (including 90772 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 114693 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 101064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 101066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 101066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.498 n_q1=292 n_q2=183 n_q3=292 n_q4=189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1IWKL7RAiy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=6783, bad_region=13594, passed=77716
Got 77716 stars (including 59933 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77716 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.565 n_q1=299 n_q2=191 n_q3=278 n_q4=170 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.225
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xpJw54iHSk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=7193, bad_region=13800, passed=78859
Got 78859 stars (including 60748 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 78859 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66824 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.627 n_q1=299 n_q2=191 n_q3=276 n_q4=173 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.227
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-53-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0376.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_043506_TTUQ2b1x1_904428_soSHhdsN/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:39:02.35 -06:06:54.7: 14.02 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:22:02.07 +01:09:29.2: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:51:25.10 -01:18:46.7: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:23:48.68 -01:26:27.3: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:48:34.56 +00:04:56.3: 14.50 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:50:37.88 -02:26:02.5: 13.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:49:04.30 -04:46:10.3: 14.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:45:16.15 -03:58:19.7: 14.39 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:47:56.62 -03:23:33.6: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:40:48.66 +00:12:05.6: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:49:04.30 -04:46:10.3: 14.16 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:39:02.35 -06:06:54.7: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:45:16.15 -03:58:19.7: 14.37 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:51:25.10 -01:18:46.7: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:23:48.68 -01:26:27.3: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:48:34.56 +00:04:56.3: 14.44 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:22:02.07 +01:09:29.2: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:50:37.88 -02:26:02.5: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:47:56.62 -03:23:33.6: 14.12 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:40:48.66 +00:12:05.6: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:02.35 -06:06:54.7: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0119 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:16.15 -03:58:19.7: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4887 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:04.30 -04:46:10.3: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0845 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:25.10 -01:18:46.7: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1423 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:48.68 -01:26:27.3: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8908 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:34.56 +00:04:56.3: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4739 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:37.88 -02:26:02.5: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0401 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:02.07 +01:09:29.2: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6081 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:56.62 -03:23:33.6: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1186 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:48.66 +00:12:05.6: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6572 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:44:15.66 -05:31:01.5: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:47:46.64 +00:23:18.8: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:48:03.61 -05:07:42.8: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:48:48.78 +02:01:21.2: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:50:34.68 -05:45:46.7: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:28:14.73 -03:21:36.2: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:50:25.29 -06:04:10.9: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:36:38.25 -02:30:50.6: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:36:34.38 -02:33:10.7: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:44:15.66 -05:31:01.5: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:47:46.64 +00:23:18.8: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:50:34.68 -05:45:46.7: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:48:03.61 -05:07:42.8: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:15.66 -05:31:01.5: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6463 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:50:25.29 -06:04:10.9: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:28:14.73 -03:21:36.2: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:34.68 -05:45:46.7: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1086 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:46.64 +00:23:18.8: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8074 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:03.61 -05:07:42.8: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7136 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:48:48.78 +02:01:21.2: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:25.29 -06:04:10.9: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2241 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:14.73 -03:21:36.2: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3725 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:48.78 +02:01:21.2: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8690 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:26:14.86 -01:09:06.2: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:36:38.25 -02:30:50.6: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:36:34.38 -02:33:10.7: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:38.25 -02:30:50.6: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1650 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:34.38 -02:33:10.7: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1499 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:26:14.86 -01:09:06.2: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:34:29.19 -05:50:58.9: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:40:19.85 -03:39:21.8: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:21:35.87 +00:43:06.2: 14.56 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:47:38.56 -05:05:59.1: 13.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:38:45.59 -03:32:12.5: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:32:00.45 -03:53:59.0: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:40:19.85 -03:39:21.8: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:32:51.25 -03:46:07.4: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:34:29.19 -05:50:58.9: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:19.85 -03:39:21.8: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6815 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:21:35.87 +00:43:06.2: 14.69 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:47:38.56 -05:05:59.1: 13.92 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:38:45.59 -03:32:12.5: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:29.19 -05:50:58.9: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5095 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:38.56 -05:05:59.1: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7322 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:21:35.87 +00:43:06.2: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6081 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:45.59 -03:32:12.5: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4416 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:32:00.45 -03:53:59.0: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:00.45 -03:53:59.0: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8552 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:43:17.60 -01:00:52.0: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:32:51.25 -03:46:07.4: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:51.25 -03:46:07.4: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8220 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:50:27.62 -03:26:24.1: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:43:17.60 -01:00:52.0: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:17.60 -01:00:52.0: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9188 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:47:35.94 -01:46:38.6: 14.98 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:49:25.55 -06:14:58.8: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:37:15.40 -01:19:27.4: 14.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:49:55.84 -05:42:22.9: 14.10 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:45:28.40 -02:40:57.0: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:50:27.62 -03:26:24.1: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:27.62 -03:26:24.1: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0040 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:47:59.00 -00:50:36.3: 15.04 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:49:25.55 -06:14:58.8: 14.75 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:47:35.94 -01:46:38.6: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:37:15.40 -01:19:27.4: 14.06 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:45:28.40 -02:40:57.0: 14.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:49:55.84 -05:42:22.9: 14.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:25.55 -06:14:58.8: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4493 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:35.94 -01:46:38.6: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3456 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:15.40 -01:19:27.4: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0518 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:28.40 -02:40:57.0: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6037 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:55.84 -05:42:22.9: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3817 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:47:59.00 -00:50:36.3: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:49:51.78 -02:52:25.8: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:59.00 -00:50:36.3: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5932 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:32:39.95 +01:36:34.5: 14.77 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:44:30.05 -05:31:05.8: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:46:06.95 -05:51:47.6: 14.65 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:52:09.14 -03:27:33.3: 14.61 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:49:51.78 -02:52:25.8: 14.71 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:51.78 -02:52:25.8: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5193 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:32:39.95 +01:36:34.5: 14.74 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:39.95 +01:36:34.5: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5776 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:46:06.95 -05:51:47.6: 14.74 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:52:09.14 -03:27:33.3: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:06.95 -05:51:47.6: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5881 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:44:30.05 -05:31:05.8: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:30.05 -05:31:05.8: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7233 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:09.14 -03:27:33.3: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7068 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_03-56-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits at 20:52:08.53 +01:24:52.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-06-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0369.fits at 20:52:08.53 +01:24:52.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:08.53 +01:24:52.0: the position falls in a bad CCD region (bad_region.lst) on all measured reference images -- cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out141647.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out142176.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133848_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 133848_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133849_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 133849_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133852_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 133852_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133861_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 133861_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133863_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 133863_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133864_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 133864_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133867_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 133867_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133870_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 133870_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133871_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 133871_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133872_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 133872_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133878_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 133878_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133881_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 133881_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133882_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 133882_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133886_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 133886_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:30.59 -02:03:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133887_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 133887_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133890_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 133890_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134086_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 134086_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:33.29 -03:50:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136979_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 136979_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137892_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 137892_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:26.71 +01:44:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137988_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 137988_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139404_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 139404_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139654_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 139654_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139774_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 139774_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:35:30.76 +01:48:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141647_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
Preparing report for the candidate 141647_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141779_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 141779_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141995_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 141995_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142031_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 142031_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142176_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
Preparing report for the candidate 142176_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142579_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 142579_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143168_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 143168_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:39:06.72 -03:58:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143228_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 143228_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143439_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 143439_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143549_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 143549_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143961_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 143961_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:34:22.51 -03:55:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144176_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 144176_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:30:23.49 +01:26:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144209_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 144209_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144302_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 144302_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144860_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 144860_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146569_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 146569_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147011_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 147011_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147060_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 147060_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147472_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 147472_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147581_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 147581_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147637_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 147637_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147738_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 147738_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147849_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 147849_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147862_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 147862_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147882_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 147882_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101717_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 101717_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:54.93 +00:56:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98104_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 98104_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:17.88 +01:19:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126767_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 126767_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102712_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377
The candidate 102712_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-55-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0377 did not pass the final checks