This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.1319 2461231.6319 10.85 17:43:21.45 -06:48:24.7
18.85891 11.80756 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.51 Nemausa 0 0 0 11.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:43:21.45 -06:48:24.7: 14.87 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:43:21.45 -06:48:24.7: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.26
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461231.6319,10.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260710.1319 10.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.1319 2461231.6319 11.60 17:47:30.64 -06:53:12.5
19.30576 10.87099 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.216 Kleopatra -1 1 2 11.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:47:30.64 -06:53:12.5: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:47:30.64 -06:53:12.5: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461231.6319,11.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260710.1319 11.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.1319 2461231.6319 13.53 17:59:33.47 -08:34:16.8
19.29133 7.44410 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.205 Martha -1 -1 1 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:59:33.47 -08:34:16.8: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:59:33.47 -08:34:16.8: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461231.6319,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260710.1319 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.1319 2461231.6319 13.90 17:59:30.19 -13:44:23.9
14.74871 4.92959 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.540 Rosamunde -0 0 1 13.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:59:30.19 -13:44:23.9: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:59:30.19 -13:44:23.9: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 10.1319* 17 59 30.19 -13 44 23.9 13.9 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461231.6319,13.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260710.1319 13.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461198.88738023 07.06.2026 09:17:39.652 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
First image: 2461198.88738023 07.06.2026 09:17:39.652 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
Last image: 2461231.63225211 10.07.2026 03:10:16.582 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.05
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7913
Objects passed selection criteria: 7878
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5403.25
Average stars matched: 5035.25 (93.1893 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113688 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 8 15:05:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-141-gc31ee76a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 9 22:15:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461198.88738023 07.06.2026 09:17:39.652 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
First image: 2461198.88738023 07.06.2026 09:17:39.652 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
Last image: 2461231.63225211 10.07.2026 03:10:16.582 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 116
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 57 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 72144
Objects passed selection criteria: 72011
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 54075.8
Average stars matched: 49477.2 (91.4962 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 168948 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 8 15:05:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-141-gc31ee76a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 9 22:19:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461231.63163906
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits'
wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:01.153 -09:59:51.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:01.293 -09:59:47.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:01.153 -09:59:51.25
Second-epoch image center 18:00:01.293 -09:59:47.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0013 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:58.629 -10:00:10.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:01.153 -09:59:51.25
Second-epoch image center 17:59:58.629 -10:00:10.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0116 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:00:01.293 -09:59:47.24
Second-epoch second image center 17:59:58.629 -10:00:10.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01268 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SLygrNGD25
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rBEQ8uD4Mq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iASDxwIqNx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.N1VD2mF6RY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9240 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9735 to 278.0956 deg, Dec -15.2616 to -4.6964 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9735 to 278.0956 deg, Dec -15.2616 to -4.6964 deg
Loaded 6279 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4734 out of 4971 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4971 out of 9240 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.698300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.698300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.05
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.65
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9240 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9735 to 278.0956 deg, Dec -15.2616 to -4.6964 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9735 to 278.0956 deg, Dec -15.2616 to -4.6964 deg
Loaded 6279 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4734 out of 4971 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4971 out of 9240 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 9158 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9457 to 278.0926 deg, Dec -15.2453 to -4.6949 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9457 to 278.0926 deg, Dec -15.2453 to -4.6949 deg
Loaded 6264 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4723 out of 4951 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4951 out of 9158 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
2.4 pix Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
14.6 mag. Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.SLygrNGD25 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=642, bad_region=1538, passed=9240
Got 9240 stars (including 7146 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9240 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7658 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits N_match=924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.889 n_q1=175 n_q2=110 n_q3=476 n_q4=163 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.435
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rBEQ8uD4Mq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=640, bad_region=1522, passed=9158
Got 9158 stars (including 7080 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9158 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.595 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.606 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.589 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.870 n_q1=175 n_q2=111 n_q3=480 n_q4=161 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.462
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iASDxwIqNx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=421, bad_region=1694, passed=4940
Got 4940 stars (including 2962 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3481 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3481 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.712 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.455 n_q1=359 n_q2=270 n_q3=195 n_q4=108 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.334
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.N1VD2mF6RY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=370, bad_region=1749, passed=5003
Got 5003 stars (including 3020 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5003 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3504 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.770 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.429 n_q1=360 n_q2=270 n_q3=192 n_q4=111 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.484
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits sigma_overall=0.619 worst_q_ratio=1.435
ref2=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits sigma_overall=0.595 worst_q_ratio=1.462
new1=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits sigma_overall=0.533 worst_q_ratio=1.334
new2=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits sigma_overall=0.519 worst_q_ratio=1.484
reference average sigma_overall=0.607 worst_q_ratio=1.4485
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094_astrometric_residuals.png (924 matched stars from wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.55 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095_astrometric_residuals.png (927 matched stars from wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016_astrometric_residuals.png (932 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:43:21.45 -06:48:24.7: 14.87 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:43:21.45 -06:48:24.7: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.26
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:43:21.45 -06:48:24.7: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.26 new_mean_mag=10.8501 delta=4.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21007.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21007_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 21007_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
17:43:21.45 -06:48:24.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:01.153 -09:59:51.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:01.293 -09:59:47.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:01.153 -09:59:51.25
Second-epoch image center 18:00:01.293 -09:59:47.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0013 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:58.629 -10:00:10.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:01.153 -09:59:51.25
Second-epoch image center 17:59:58.629 -10:00:10.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0116 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:00:01.293 -09:59:47.24
Second-epoch second image center 17:59:58.629 -10:00:10.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01268 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JilDEHhxxT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6gYUMp95TF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZtNaKNJBiF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.u6QnUKwelw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 81855 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9418 to 278.0982 deg, Dec -15.2616 to -4.6950 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9418 to 278.0982 deg, Dec -15.2616 to -4.6950 deg
Loaded 6291 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4653 out of 5508 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5508 out of 81855 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.485400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.485400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.72
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.72
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 81855 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9418 to 278.0982 deg, Dec -15.2616 to -4.6950 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9418 to 278.0982 deg, Dec -15.2616 to -4.6950 deg
Loaded 6291 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4653 out of 5508 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5508 out of 81855 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 82556 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9187 to 278.0948 deg, Dec -15.2477 to -4.6892 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9187 to 278.0948 deg, Dec -15.2477 to -4.6892 deg
Loaded 6277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4626 out of 5489 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5489 out of 82556 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 64 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
2.3 pix Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
2.2 pix fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
2.2 pix fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
14.7 mag. Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JilDEHhxxT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=6448, bad_region=9985, passed=81852
Got 81852 stars (including 66378 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 81852 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.758 n_q1=205 n_q2=119 n_q3=456 n_q4=151 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.314
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6gYUMp95TF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=6545, bad_region=10156, passed=82547
Got 82547 stars (including 66839 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 82547 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.584 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.634 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.743 n_q1=205 n_q2=121 n_q3=453 n_q4=154 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZtNaKNJBiF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2722, bad_region=14802, passed=51760
Got 51760 stars (including 35118 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51760 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39098 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.647 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.470 n_q1=366 n_q2=266 n_q3=187 n_q4=116 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.u6QnUKwelw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2664, bad_region=14951, passed=52054
Got 52054 stars (including 35338 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52054 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39149 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39147 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39147 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.479 n_q1=368 n_q2=266 n_q3=183 n_q4=116 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.195
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-09-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221300_TTUQ2b1x1_704958_C3gTTWYu/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:44:13.29 -06:51:06.4: 13.59 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:48:18.06 -12:45:56.4: 14.06 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:41:51.09 -14:05:07.7: 13.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:48:20.26 -12:19:14.2: 13.72 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:44:26.16 -12:30:10.9: 13.89 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:42:24.96 -14:04:00.8: 13.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:44:13.29 -06:51:06.4: 13.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:44:13.29 -06:51:06.4: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8717 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:44:07.44 -13:35:34.3: 13.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:48:18.06 -12:45:56.4: 13.95 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:48:18.06 -12:45:56.4: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.8377 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 18:01:55.83 -11:50:20.1: 14.09 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:44:26.16 -12:30:10.9: 13.94 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:44:26.16 -12:30:10.9: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9515 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:48:20.26 -12:19:14.2: 13.63 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:48:20.26 -12:19:14.2: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0107 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:43:11.17 -14:00:50.9: 13.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:41:51.09 -14:05:07.7: 13.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:41:51.09 -14:05:07.7: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4004 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 18:17:07.25 -13:24:10.7: 13.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:44:07.44 -13:35:34.3: 13.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 18:01:55.83 -11:50:20.1: 13.87 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:44:07.44 -13:35:34.3: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3878 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:42:24.96 -14:04:00.8: 13.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:42:24.96 -14:04:00.8: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1234 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:01:55.83 -11:50:20.1: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0911 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 18:17:07.25 -13:24:10.7: 13.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:43:11.17 -14:00:50.9: 13.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:17:07.25 -13:24:10.7: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3140 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:43:11.17 -14:00:50.9: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1918 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 18:09:37.03 -08:34:33.0: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:43:23.45 -13:44:51.8: 12.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 18:09:37.03 -08:34:33.0: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:09:37.03 -08:34:33.0: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0219 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:43:23.45 -13:44:51.8: 12.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:43:23.45 -13:44:51.8: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1721 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:51:14.71 -13:42:33.1: 12.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 18:17:07.26 -13:02:30.1: 12.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:54:14.89 -12:46:25.2: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:45:25.91 -13:01:03.8: 12.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 18:00:50.21 -11:52:52.8: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:45:57.52 -06:26:50.9: 11.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 18:17:07.26 -13:02:30.1: 12.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:45:25.91 -13:01:03.8: 12.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:17:07.26 -13:02:30.1: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8460 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:45:25.91 -13:01:03.8: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8114 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:51:14.71 -13:42:33.1: 12.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:51:14.71 -13:42:33.1: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0010 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 18:01:08.54 -12:13:29.7: 11.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:54:14.89 -12:46:25.2: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:54:14.89 -12:46:25.2: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5429 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 18:00:50.21 -11:52:52.8: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:00:50.21 -11:52:52.8: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6053 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:45:57.52 -06:26:50.9: 11.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:45:57.52 -06:26:50.9: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4473 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:42:18.45 -13:13:25.0: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 18:01:08.54 -12:13:29.7: 12.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:01:08.54 -12:13:29.7: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2520 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:47:30.64 -06:53:12.5: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:58:48.79 -11:45:29.2: 12.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:42:16.91 -13:13:15.3: 12.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:42:18.45 -13:13:25.0: 12.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:42:18.45 -13:13:25.0: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0338 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:48:34.83 -14:03:51.1: 13.21 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:58:48.79 -11:45:29.2: 12.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:42:16.91 -13:13:15.3: 12.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:58:48.79 -11:45:29.2: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5838 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:42:16.91 -13:13:15.3: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0960 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:46:02.64 -14:10:00.1: 13.35 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:47:30.64 -06:53:12.5: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 18:18:27.65 -14:05:22.0: 13.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:48:34.83 -14:03:51.1: 13.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:46:02.64 -14:10:00.1: 13.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:48:34.83 -14:03:51.1: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3212 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:46:02.64 -14:10:00.1: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3893 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:42:20.78 -13:24:24.2: 13.90 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:43:35.13 -13:55:52.3: 13.63 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 18:18:27.65 -14:05:22.0: 13.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:41:55.21 -13:35:45.1: 13.73 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:18:27.65 -14:05:22.0: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2591 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:42:12.48 -14:03:52.2: 14.00 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:42:20.78 -13:24:24.2: 13.88 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:42:20.78 -13:24:24.2: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6515 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:41:55.21 -13:35:45.1: 13.73 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:43:35.13 -13:55:52.3: 13.55 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:43:35.13 -13:55:52.3: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6605 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:41:55.21 -13:35:45.1: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.3596 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:59:33.47 -08:34:16.8: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:42:12.48 -14:03:52.2: 14.01 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:42:12.48 -14:03:52.2: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7155 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:44:11.27 -13:50:40.6: 14.24 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:44:06.90 -13:15:52.6: 13.89 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:59:33.47 -08:34:16.8: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:44:11.27 -13:50:40.6: 14.00 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:44:11.27 -13:50:40.6: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7144 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:44:06.90 -13:15:52.6: 13.88 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:44:06.90 -13:15:52.6: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7769 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:43:44.55 -14:14:12.1: 14.04 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:59:30.19 -13:44:23.9: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:41:43.74 -13:09:27.4: 14.21 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:42:02.86 -13:38:21.8: 14.25 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:43:44.55 -14:14:12.1: 14.04 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:43:44.55 -14:14:12.1: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7918 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:49:55.88 -13:16:19.9: 14.18 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:43:34.20 -13:17:29.8: 14.19 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:59:30.19 -13:44:23.9: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:41:43.74 -13:09:27.4: 14.19 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:41:43.74 -13:09:27.4: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.9995 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:42:02.86 -13:38:21.8: 14.47 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:42:02.86 -13:38:21.8: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9997 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 17:44:15.29 -13:59:05.4: 14.21 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-17-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0094.fits at 18:04:20.96 -11:22:42.2: 14.12 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:43:34.20 -13:17:29.8: 14.09 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:43:34.20 -13:17:29.8: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0447 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:49:55.88 -13:16:19.9: 14.21 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:49:55.88 -13:16:19.9: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.9734 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 17:44:15.29 -13:59:05.4: 14.12 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:44:15.29 -13:59:05.4: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0804 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-18-28_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits at 18:04:20.96 -11:22:42.2: 14.06 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:04:20.96 -11:22:42.2: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9594 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101086.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out106891.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out107997.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99985_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 99985_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99990_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 99990_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99993_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 99993_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99995_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 99995_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99999_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 99999_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100007_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 100007_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:56.28 -13:57:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100016_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 100016_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100042_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 100042_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100043_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 100043_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100044_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 100044_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100051_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 100051_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100053_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 100053_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100055_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 100055_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100059_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 100059_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100061_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 100061_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:32.72 -13:20:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100065_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 100065_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:47.19 -13:27:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100066_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 100066_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100069_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 100069_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100072_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 100072_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100076_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 100076_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:43.22 -13:31:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100078_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 100078_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100079_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 100079_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100081_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 100081_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:07.23 -11:28:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100082_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 100082_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100084_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 100084_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100087_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 100087_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100611_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 100611_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:21.45 -06:48:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100739_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 100739_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:10.68 -14:14:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101086_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 101086_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101576_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 101576_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102403_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 102403_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:58.53 -13:28:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102491_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 102491_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103497_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 103497_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:56.60 -10:53:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103874_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 103874_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:03.39 -12:42:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104376_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 104376_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:00.43 -14:10:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104614_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 104614_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105065_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 105065_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:02.60 -13:30:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105142_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 105142_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:39.86 -09:15:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105176_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 105176_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105546_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 105546_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105743_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 105743_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:48.94 -13:21:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106022_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 106022_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106413_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 106413_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106467_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 106467_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106590_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 106590_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:53.36 -13:53:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106806_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 106806_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106864_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 106864_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:34.32 -13:17:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106891_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 106891_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106911_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 106911_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107027_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 107027_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107249_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 107249_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:57.09 -07:49:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107755_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 107755_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:30.73 -13:52:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107758_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 107758_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107873_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 107873_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:40.15 -13:55:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107992_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 107992_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107997_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 107997_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108055_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 108055_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:12.05 -13:58:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108141_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 108141_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108417_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 108417_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108469_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 108469_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108471_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 108471_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108669_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 108669_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31994_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 31994_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:59.65 -10:40:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17637_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 17637_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_22-10-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks