This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 09.2467 2461230.7467 12.48 20:14:07.73 -13:37:02.6
29.59079 -24.37553 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.125 Liberatrix -0 -0 1 12.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:14:07.73 -13:37:02.6: 14.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:14:07.73 -13:37:02.6: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 09.2467* 20 14 07.73 -13 37 02.6 12.5 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461230.7467,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260709.2467 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 09.2467 2461230.7467 13.45 20:40:51.56 -10:13:24.0
36.09096 -28.90732 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1058 Grubba -2 -1 2 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:40:51.56 -10:13:24.0: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:40:51.56 -10:13:24.0: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461230.7467,13.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260709.2467 13.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461129.97900007 30.03.2026 11:29:35.606 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
First image: 2461129.97900007 30.03.2026 11:29:35.606 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Last image: 2461230.74698596 09.07.2026 05:55:29.587 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5068
Objects passed selection criteria: 5064
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5798.5
Average stars matched: 4444.75 (76.6534 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113300 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 8 15:05:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-141-gc31ee76a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 9 01:01:50 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461129.97900007 30.03.2026 11:29:35.606 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
First image: 2461129.97900007 30.03.2026 11:29:35.606 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Last image: 2461230.74698596 09.07.2026 05:55:29.587 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 82
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.00
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 45457
Objects passed selection criteria: 45378
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 44343.5
Average stars matched: 39937.8 (90.0645 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 149512 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 8 15:05:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-141-gc31ee76a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 9 01:03:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461230.74639366
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:33:53.114 -09:58:49.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63
Second-epoch image center 20:33:53.114 -09:58:49.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1347 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:33:51.788 -09:59:20.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63
Second-epoch image center 20:33:51.788 -09:59:20.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1392 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:33:53.114 -09:58:49.01
Second-epoch second image center 20:33:51.788 -09:59:20.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01029 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QHoCNUwX2Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sFovti4wgW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YltF6hVmmI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zcIxP7rPnp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6247 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5092 to 316.6547 deg, Dec -15.2711 to -4.6672 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5092 to 316.6547 deg, Dec -15.2711 to -4.6672 deg
Loaded 9320 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5060 out of 5163 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5163 out of 6247 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.449100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.449100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6247 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5092 to 316.6547 deg, Dec -15.2711 to -4.6672 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5092 to 316.6547 deg, Dec -15.2711 to -4.6672 deg
Loaded 9320 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5060 out of 5163 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5163 out of 6247 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 12515 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2071 to 316.7410 deg, Dec -15.6099 to -4.2652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2071 to 316.7410 deg, Dec -15.6099 to -4.2652 deg
Loaded 10202 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7581 out of 7799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7799 out of 12515 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits (aperture=7.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
3.5 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
3.5 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
14.6 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.QHoCNUwX2Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=365, bad_region=1217, passed=6247
Got 6247 stars (including 4715 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6247 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.350 n_q1=286 n_q2=152 n_q3=328 n_q4=186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.253
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sFovti4wgW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=557, bad_region=2216, passed=12515
Got 12515 stars (including 9826 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12515 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10385 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10385 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=280 n_q2=141 n_q3=343 n_q4=181 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YltF6hVmmI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=263, bad_region=1044, passed=5068
Got 5068 stars (including 3798 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5068 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=282 n_q2=153 n_q3=324 n_q4=196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zcIxP7rPnp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=294, bad_region=1043, passed=5027
Got 5027 stars (including 3735 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5027 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4035 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4036 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4036 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.420 n_q1=282 n_q2=157 n_q3=324 n_q4=193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.143
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.253
ref2=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.279
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits sigma_overall=0.409 worst_q_ratio=1.120
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits sigma_overall=0.423 worst_q_ratio=1.143
reference average sigma_overall=0.347 worst_q_ratio=1.266
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417_astrometric_residuals.png (952 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344_astrometric_residuals.png (945 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061_astrometric_residuals.png (955 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:33:53.114 -09:58:49.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63
Second-epoch image center 20:33:53.114 -09:58:49.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1347 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:33:51.788 -09:59:20.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63
Second-epoch image center 20:33:51.788 -09:59:20.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1392 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:33:53.114 -09:58:49.01
Second-epoch second image center 20:33:51.788 -09:59:20.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01029 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.j6NWEiZScH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits &> /tmp/tmp.znstAHqtIb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SOEsj92q0S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GutSRNBvk8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 49699 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.4982 to 316.6567 deg, Dec -15.2729 to -4.6614 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.4982 to 316.6567 deg, Dec -15.2729 to -4.6614 deg
Loaded 9336 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7693 out of 8323 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8323 out of 49699 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.238900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.238900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.00
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 49699 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.4982 to 316.6567 deg, Dec -15.2729 to -4.6614 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.4982 to 316.6567 deg, Dec -15.2729 to -4.6614 deg
Loaded 9336 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7693 out of 8323 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8323 out of 49699 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 67486 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1864 to 316.7677 deg, Dec -15.6099 to -4.2574 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1864 to 316.7677 deg, Dec -15.6099 to -4.2574 deg
Loaded 10232 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7501 out of 8355 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8355 out of 67486 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 58 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
3.3 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
3.3 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
14.7 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.j6NWEiZScH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2235, bad_region=6663, passed=49692
Got 49692 stars (including 41013 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49692 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.400 n_q1=300 n_q2=150 n_q3=301 n_q4=199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.znstAHqtIb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=4245, bad_region=10005, passed=67479
Got 67479 stars (including 53636 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67479 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.274 n_q1=273 n_q2=142 n_q3=353 n_q4=180 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SOEsj92q0S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1717, bad_region=5338, passed=44187
Got 44187 stars (including 37352 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44187 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39216 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39214 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39214 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=288 n_q2=151 n_q3=316 n_q4=197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.170
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GutSRNBvk8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1686, bad_region=5422, passed=44684
Got 44684 stars (including 37799 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44684 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39539 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39539 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39539 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=283 n_q2=151 n_q3=323 n_q4=197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.207
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-54-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_005923_TTUQ2b1x1_3624177_eHtFrivh/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:07:57.05 -12:42:22.4: 13.13 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:39:45.91 -05:48:31.0: 13.23 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:33:16.36 -10:26:06.6: 13.57 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:16:40.41 -11:29:09.6: 13.44 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:43:35.86 -07:30:03.6: 13.43 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:09:26.61 -13:50:13.9: 13.28 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:11:38.21 -08:41:48.0: 13.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:27:47.21 -08:10:34.7: 13.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:49:30.67 -05:44:45.5: 13.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:25:26.37 -13:45:03.6: 13.32 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:43:35.86 -07:30:03.6: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:16:40.41 -11:29:09.6: 13.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:49:30.67 -05:44:45.5: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:09:26.61 -13:50:13.9: 13.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:39:45.91 -05:48:31.0: 12.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:07:57.05 -12:42:22.4: 12.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:11:38.21 -08:41:48.0: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:35.86 -07:30:03.6: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5404 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:33:16.36 -10:26:06.6: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:40.41 -11:29:09.6: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4983 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:30.67 -05:44:45.5: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3888 delta=-0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:26.61 -13:50:13.9: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2295 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:45.91 -05:48:31.0: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2622 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:38.21 -08:41:48.0: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2746 delta=-0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:57.05 -12:42:22.4: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2328 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:16.36 -10:26:06.6: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5325 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:27:47.21 -08:10:34.7: 12.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:47.21 -08:10:34.7: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4623 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:25:26.37 -13:45:03.6: 13.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:26.37 -13:45:03.6: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3043 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:50:22.89 -09:41:37.2: 12.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:27:06.52 -07:50:14.2: 12.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:16:57.24 -10:10:53.7: 12.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:10:06.47 -08:39:56.1: 12.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:25:36.86 -07:02:00.2: 12.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:17:00.94 -12:35:14.1: 12.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:20:22.22 -09:58:08.8: 11.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:27:15.65 -06:46:47.9: 12.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:07:19.87 -08:39:46.0: 13.24 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:36:23.66 -09:51:36.7: 11.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:27:06.52 -07:50:14.2: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:06.52 -07:50:14.2: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7808 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:16:57.24 -10:10:53.7: 12.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:57.24 -10:10:53.7: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9603 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:17:00.94 -12:35:14.1: 12.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:00.94 -12:35:14.1: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5160 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:50:22.89 -09:41:37.2: 12.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:07:19.87 -08:39:46.0: 12.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:22.89 -09:41:37.2: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1413 delta=-0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:19.87 -08:39:46.0: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2638 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:20:22.22 -09:58:08.8: 10.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:22.22 -09:58:08.8: ref_mag=11.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7518 delta=-0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:27:15.65 -06:46:47.9: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:25:36.86 -07:02:00.2: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:10:06.47 -08:39:56.1: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:15.65 -06:46:47.9: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0832 delta=-0.80 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:06.47 -08:39:56.1: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7310 delta=-0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:36.86 -07:02:00.2: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9102 delta=-0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:36:23.66 -09:51:36.7: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:23.66 -09:51:36.7: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0540 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:25:44.20 -07:51:41.1: 12.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:14:07.73 -13:37:02.6: 14.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:43:55.84 -07:18:04.9: 12.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:27:54.37 -10:07:09.6: 12.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:14:34.77 -09:48:48.1: 12.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:15:57.94 -10:08:52.7: 12.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:19:28.33 -13:13:41.5: 12.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:22:03.01 -07:47:08.2: 12.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:10:56.88 -07:55:59.9: 12.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:14:07.73 -13:37:02.6: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:25:44.20 -07:51:41.1: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:44.20 -07:51:41.1: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4164 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:43:55.84 -07:18:04.9: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:14:34.77 -09:48:48.1: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:15:57.94 -10:08:52.7: 12.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:34.77 -09:48:48.1: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5326 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:57.94 -10:08:52.7: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6611 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:55.84 -07:18:04.9: ref_mag=11.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4931 delta=-0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:19:28.33 -13:13:41.5: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:28.33 -13:13:41.5: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6277 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:27:54.37 -10:07:09.6: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:54.37 -10:07:09.6: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5801 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:22:03.01 -07:47:08.2: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:03.01 -07:47:08.2: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9801 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:10:56.88 -07:55:59.9: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:56.88 -07:55:59.9: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6746 delta=-1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:08:39.22 -07:01:34.6: 13.20 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:12:09.78 -12:54:08.2: 13.29 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:18:06.80 -11:17:04.0: 12.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:12:30.29 -10:14:05.4: 13.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:25:12.63 -06:58:08.0: 13.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:47:10.93 -06:31:57.2: 13.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:20:50.14 -06:54:19.7: 13.07 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:15:34.81 -07:07:58.6: 12.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:08:39.22 -07:01:34.6: 12.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:12:09.78 -12:54:08.2: 12.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:39.22 -07:01:34.6: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1392 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:09.78 -12:54:08.2: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1629 delta=-0.77 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:12:30.29 -10:14:05.4: 13.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:25:12.63 -06:58:08.0: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:12.63 -06:58:08.0: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1658 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:30.29 -10:14:05.4: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3351 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:20:50.14 -06:54:19.7: 13.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:47:10.93 -06:31:57.2: 13.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:18:06.80 -11:17:04.0: 12.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:50.14 -06:54:19.7: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2780 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:10.93 -06:31:57.2: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4330 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:06.80 -11:17:04.0: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1666 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:15:34.81 -07:07:58.6: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:34.81 -07:07:58.6: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2591 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:34:31.24 -05:49:54.4: 13.46 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:34:31.24 -05:49:54.4: 13.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:31:52.12 -08:34:00.7: 13.29 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:37:28.60 -06:46:20.4: 13.81 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:31.24 -05:49:54.4: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2648 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:10:16.54 -08:34:18.6: 13.27 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:16:02.12 -12:42:39.3: 14.04 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:33:14.07 -10:08:25.2: 13.15 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:40:51.56 -10:13:24.0: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:05:48.94 -12:47:40.5: 13.45 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:31:52.12 -08:34:00.7: 13.42 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:37:28.60 -06:46:20.4: 13.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:19:46.50 -10:37:56.3: 13.70 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:52.12 -08:34:00.7: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4212 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:28.60 -06:46:20.4: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5731 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:40:51.56 -10:13:24.0: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:10:16.54 -08:34:18.6: 13.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:16:02.12 -12:42:39.3: 14.18 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:05:48.94 -12:47:40.5: 13.73 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:16.54 -08:34:18.6: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5708 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:02.12 -12:42:39.3: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6260 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:33:14.07 -10:08:25.2: 13.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:48.94 -12:47:40.5: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6715 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:14.07 -10:08:25.2: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2992 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:37:39.88 -11:29:48.7: 14.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:19:46.50 -10:37:56.3: 13.52 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:46.50 -10:37:56.3: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6234 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:37:39.88 -11:29:48.7: 14.04 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:39.88 -11:29:48.7: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6165 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:12:03.20 -12:57:01.0: 14.19 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:25:51.97 -12:40:19.8: 13.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:17:22.63 -12:13:40.3: 13.93 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:12:10.79 -12:30:39.3: 13.65 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:25:51.97 -12:40:19.8: 13.99 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:51.97 -12:40:19.8: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7724 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:12:03.20 -12:57:01.0: 13.86 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:03.20 -12:57:01.0: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7105 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:17:22.63 -12:13:40.3: 13.86 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:12:10.79 -12:30:39.3: 14.13 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:22.63 -12:13:40.3: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7927 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:10.79 -12:30:39.3: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8393 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66715.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66922.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66493_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66493_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66497_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66497_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66499_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66499_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66503_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66503_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66508_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66508_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66510_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66510_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66514_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66514_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:19:48.90 -06:12:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66521_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66521_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66522_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66522_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66524_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66524_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66526_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66526_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66528_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66528_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66529_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66529_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66539_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66539_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66541_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66541_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66543_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66543_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66551_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66551_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66552_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66552_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66555_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66555_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66642_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66642_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66677_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66677_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66679_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66679_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:58.59 -05:57:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66712_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66712_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66715_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
Preparing report for the candidate 66715_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66721_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66721_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66724_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66724_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66731_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66731_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66746_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66746_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66756_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66756_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:32.90 -06:43:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66765_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66765_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66769_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66769_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66785_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66785_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66802_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66802_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:00.61 -06:08:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66807_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66807_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:53.12 -12:49:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66813_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66813_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66827_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66827_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66851_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66851_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66863_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66863_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66870_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66870_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66871_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66871_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66875_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66875_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:06:58.42 -08:00:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66878_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66878_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66882_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66882_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66886_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66886_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66913_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66913_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66914_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66914_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66922_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
Preparing report for the candidate 66922_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66927_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66927_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:28:43.53 -11:47:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66954_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66954_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66979_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66979_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66990_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66990_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66991_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66991_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66993_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 66993_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67010_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 67010_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67037_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 67037_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67043_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 67043_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67070_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 67070_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67080_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 67080_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks