This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 09.2195 2461230.7195 11.46 18:14:08.12 -36:04:47.8
356.72483 -8.74158 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" V0679 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.600 pg 17.900 pg 2434213.00000 226.000000000000 Me
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:14:08.12 -36:04:47.8: 13.67 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:14:08.12 -36:04:47.8: 13.39 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.12
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0679 Sgr,2461230.7195,11.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0679 Sgr 20260709.2195 11.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 09.2195 2461230.7195 11.44 18:16:56.94 -34:07:28.8
358.74904 -8.35767 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J181657-3407.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.351 Ic Y 0.678 Ic 2454867.80000 886.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:16:56.94 -34:07:28.8: 12.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:16:56.94 -34:07:28.8: 13.03 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J181657-3407.5,2461230.7195,11.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J181657-3407.5 20260709.2195 11.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 09.2195 2461230.7195 11.84 18:33:25.40 -29:58:41.2
4.08209 -9.63123 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J183325.42-295841.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.160 V 13.610 V 2458306.00000 236.000000000000 M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:33:25.40 -29:58:41.2: 12.68 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:33:25.40 -29:58:41.2: 13.53 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J183325.42-295841.4,2461230.7195,11.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J183325.42-295841.4 20260709.2195 11.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 09.2195 2461230.7195 10.38 18:17:15.29 -34:15:13.8
358.66209 -8.47293 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J181715-3415.2
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.670 V Y 0.750 V 2452154.60000 101.851852000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:17:15.29 -34:15:13.8: 11.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:17:15.29 -34:15:13.8: 11.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J181715-3415.2,2461230.7195,10.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J181715-3415.2 20260709.2195 10.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 09.2195 2461230.7195 11.12 18:46:34.80 -38:45:55.0
357.00827 -15.71174 galactic CrA Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J184635-3845.9
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.065 Ic Y 0.457 Ic 2452812.20000 136.400000000000 Me
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:46:34.80 -38:45:55.0: 11.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:46:34.80 -38:45:55.0: 12.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J184635-3845.9,2461230.7195,11.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J184635-3845.9 20260709.2195 11.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 09.2195 2461230.7195 11.35 19:17:48.86 -29:16:40.6
8.72328 -18.18846 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia 0 -1 1 11.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:17:48.86 -29:16:40.6: 14.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:17:48.86 -29:16:40.6: 14.76 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.36
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461230.7195,11.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260709.2195 11.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461149.94101943 19.04.2026 10:34:54.079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
First image: 2461149.94101943 19.04.2026 10:34:54.079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Last image: 2461230.71992681 09.07.2026 05:16:31.676 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.82
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9526
Objects passed selection criteria: 9520
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7099.25
Average stars matched: 6367.25 (89.6891 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115908 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 8 15:05:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-141-gc31ee76a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 9 00:25:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461149.94101943 19.04.2026 10:34:54.079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
First image: 2461149.94101943 19.04.2026 10:34:54.079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Last image: 2461230.71992681 09.07.2026 05:16:31.676 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 133
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.48
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 34 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 95251
Objects passed selection criteria: 95124
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 80419.2
Average stars matched: 65441.2 (81.3751 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1876904 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 8 15:05:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-141-gc31ee76a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 9 00:30:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461230.71914492
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits'
wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Image size: 937.5'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Image size: 940.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:56.885 -33:58:45.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15
Second-epoch image center 18:46:56.885 -33:58:45.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0218 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Image size: 940.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:54.038 -33:58:14.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15
Second-epoch image center 18:46:54.038 -33:58:14.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0332 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:46:56.885 -33:58:45.96
Second-epoch second image center 18:46:54.038 -33:58:14.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01318 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3j6AIiH3MO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XZjw6xMp17
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ntogVyi0DW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2Rf1abH7uD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9806 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.4475 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.4475 deg
Loaded 18922 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7477 out of 7738 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7738 out of 9806 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.545500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.545500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.82
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.73
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.73
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9806 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.4475 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.4475 deg
Loaded 18922 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7477 out of 7738 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7738 out of 9806 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits (aperture=7.0)
Read 12244 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7344 to 291.6637 deg, Dec -39.2761 to -28.4557 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7344 to 291.6637 deg, Dec -39.2761 to -28.4557 deg
Loaded 18882 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9258 out of 9621 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9621 out of 12244 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.9 pix Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
3.4 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
3.5 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
2.9 pix wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.7 mag. Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
14.0 mag. Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
12.6 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
12.6 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.6 (SNR ) 10.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3j6AIiH3MO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=719, bad_region=0, passed=9805
Got 9805 stars (including 9075 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9805 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9446 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.97"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.13"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.134 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.956 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.062 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.503 n_q1=270 n_q2=146 n_q3=284 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.325
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XZjw6xMp17 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=928, bad_region=0, passed=12244
Got 12244 stars (including 11301 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12244 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12033 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1015)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits N_match=922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.657 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.658 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.764 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.720 n_q1=249 n_q2=202 n_q3=262 n_q4=209 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ntogVyi0DW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=184, bad_region=0, passed=3290
Got 3290 stars (including 3098 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3290 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.3 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3148 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.3 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3147 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 910 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits N_match=910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.433 n_q1=221 n_q2=139 n_q3=334 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.225
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2Rf1abH7uD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=185, bad_region=0, passed=3302
Got 3302 stars (including 3114 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3302 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.3 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.3 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3168 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits N_match=912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.612 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.407 n_q1=224 n_q2=144 n_q3=334 n_q4=210 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.165
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits sigma_overall=1.134 worst_q_ratio=1.325
ref2=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits sigma_overall=0.657 worst_q_ratio=1.163
new1=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits sigma_overall=0.506 worst_q_ratio=1.225
new2=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits sigma_overall=0.526 worst_q_ratio=1.165
reference average sigma_overall=0.8955 worst_q_ratio=1.244
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742_astrometric_residuals.png (916 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 1.07 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260_astrometric_residuals.png (922 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.59 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096_astrometric_residuals.png (910 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097_astrometric_residuals.png (912 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:13:19.87 -29:21:09.8: 9.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:13:19.87 -29:21:09.8: 9.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.50 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:13:19.87 -29:21:09.8: ref_mag=9.50 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.7635 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22777_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 22777_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22814_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 22814_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.57 -29:04:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05295_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 05295_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:12:35.83 -32:51:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01088_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 01088_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:07.02 -37:50:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Image size: 937.5'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Image size: 940.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:56.885 -33:58:45.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15
Second-epoch image center 18:46:56.885 -33:58:45.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0218 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Image size: 940.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:54.038 -33:58:14.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15
Second-epoch image center 18:46:54.038 -33:58:14.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0332 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:46:56.885 -33:58:45.96
Second-epoch second image center 18:46:54.038 -33:58:14.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01318 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wCaRdlTULv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xzwjVfJ6Sy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits &> /tmp/tmp.17qvoXiOxT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits &> /tmp/tmp.66tPu9GtfO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 99884 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.3528 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.3528 deg
Loaded 19095 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13575 out of 15526 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15526 out of 99884 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.236500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.236500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.48
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.76
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.76
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 99884 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.3528 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.3528 deg
Loaded 19095 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13575 out of 15526 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15526 out of 99884 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 152296 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.6842 to 291.7049 deg, Dec -39.2762 to -28.4509 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.6842 to 291.7049 deg, Dec -39.2762 to -28.4509 deg
Loaded 18985 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13296 out of 16025 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16025 out of 152296 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 123 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
3.0 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
3.0 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
2.6 pix wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.8 mag. Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
14.1 mag. Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
12.7 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
12.7 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.7 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.wCaRdlTULv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=8993, bad_region=1, passed=99872
Got 99872 stars (including 90756 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99872 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 97061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.90"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 97061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.90"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 96943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.02"
Excluding outliers - 920 stars left (next iteration limit 1014)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits N_match=920 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.076 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.906 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.280 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.156 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.428 n_q1=272 n_q2=134 n_q3=309 n_q4=205 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.327
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xzwjVfJ6Sy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=13704, bad_region=1, passed=152273
Got 152273 stars (including 138360 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 152273 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150504 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1017)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits N_match=924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.641 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.707 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.686 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.826 n_q1=249 n_q2=215 n_q3=244 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.17qvoXiOxT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1338, bad_region=1, passed=35974
Got 35974 stars (including 34573 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35974 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits N_match=912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.614 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.466 n_q1=197 n_q2=134 n_q3=354 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.037
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.66tPu9GtfO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1353, bad_region=1, passed=35974
Got 35974 stars (including 34579 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35974 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1008)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits N_match=917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.639 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.595 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=196 n_q2=142 n_q3=354 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_002252_TTUQ1b1x1_1505447_NEQLo2OT/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:36:40.57 -29:50:45.9: 10.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:17:25.24 -35:56:44.7: 12.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:40:16.89 -29:43:30.1: 12.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:26:34.77 -32:45:24.8: 11.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:15:08.99 -29:50:01.9: 9.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:16:21.09 -33:22:54.4: 11.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:16:08.70 -34:10:29.8: 11.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:42:33.77 -38:57:39.8: 10.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:36:40.57 -29:50:45.9: 11.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:36:40.57 -29:50:45.9: ref_mag=10.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.5784 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:15:08.99 -29:50:01.9: 10.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:40:16.89 -29:43:30.1: 12.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:18:23.68 -33:08:43.4: 11.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:15:08.99 -29:50:01.9: ref_mag=9.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=9.9441 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:40:16.89 -29:43:30.1: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2580 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:26:34.77 -32:45:24.8: 11.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:17:25.24 -35:56:44.7: 11.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:26:34.77 -32:45:24.8: ref_mag=11.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7727 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:17:25.24 -35:56:44.7: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8673 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:16:21.09 -33:22:54.4: 11.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:16:08.70 -34:10:29.8: 11.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:16:21.09 -33:22:54.4: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5127 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:16:08.70 -34:10:29.8: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5138 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:42:33.77 -38:57:39.8: 10.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:33.77 -38:57:39.8: ref_mag=10.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.5650 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:18:23.68 -33:08:43.4: 10.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:18:23.68 -33:08:43.4: ref_mag=10.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1581 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:14:57.92 -28:41:59.2: 11.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:14:57.92 -28:41:59.2: 12.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:14:57.92 -28:41:59.2: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.5946 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:35:26.78 -32:54:30.3: 12.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:35:26.78 -32:54:30.3: 12.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:35:26.78 -32:54:30.3: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.8686 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:00:48.35 -30:54:56.2: 13.77 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:00:48.35 -30:54:56.2: 14.37 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:00:48.35 -30:54:56.2: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=12.6196 delta=1.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:14:08.12 -36:04:47.8: 13.67 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:16:56.94 -34:07:28.8: 12.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:33:25.40 -29:58:41.2: 12.68 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:17:15.29 -34:15:13.8: 11.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:14:08.12 -36:04:47.8: 13.39 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:14:08.12 -36:04:47.8: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=11.4409 delta=2.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:22:03.30 -30:07:21.9: 11.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:16:56.94 -34:07:28.8: 13.03 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:16:56.94 -34:07:28.8: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=11.4391 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:33:25.40 -29:58:41.2: 13.53 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:33:25.40 -29:58:41.2: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=11.8376 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:17:15.29 -34:15:13.8: 11.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:17:15.29 -34:15:13.8: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.3751 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:22:03.30 -30:07:21.9: 11.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:22:03.30 -30:07:21.9: ref_mag=11.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2782 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:21:47.05 -29:55:08.5: 11.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:23:30.41 -32:49:48.6: 10.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:21:47.05 -29:55:08.5: 11.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:47.05 -29:55:08.5: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5829 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:22:38.82 -31:21:13.2: 10.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:23:30.41 -32:49:48.6: 10.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:30.41 -32:49:48.6: ref_mag=10.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.5899 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:22:38.82 -31:21:13.2: 9.90 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.96 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:22:38.82 -31:21:13.2: ref_mag=9.96 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1465 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:46:34.80 -38:45:55.0: 11.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:21:33.73 -32:25:29.4: 12.01 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:46:34.80 -38:45:55.0: 12.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:46:34.80 -38:45:55.0: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.1244 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:21:33.73 -32:25:29.4: 11.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:33.73 -32:25:29.4: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6753 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:23:24.65 -34:25:32.5: 10.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:20:29.31 -31:34:28.4: 12.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:23:24.65 -34:25:32.5: 10.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:20:29.31 -31:34:28.4: 11.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:24.65 -34:25:32.5: ref_mag=10.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.4052 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:29.31 -31:34:28.4: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8935 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:20:12.51 -33:04:43.2: 11.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:20:12.51 -33:04:43.2: 11.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:12.51 -33:04:43.2: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6813 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:20:50.64 -30:58:16.3: 11.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:20:50.64 -30:58:16.3: 11.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:50.64 -30:58:16.3: ref_mag=11.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4509 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:21:49.87 -30:18:29.1: 11.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:21:49.87 -30:18:29.1: 10.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:49.87 -30:18:29.1: ref_mag=10.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8871 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:17:48.86 -29:16:40.6: 14.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:21:19.31 -29:49:48.1: 10.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:17:48.86 -29:16:40.6: 14.76 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.36
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:17:48.86 -29:16:40.6: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.36 new_mean_mag=11.3453 delta=3.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:21:36.23 -30:48:58.1: 10.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:21:19.31 -29:49:48.1: 9.86 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.92 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:19.31 -29:49:48.1: ref_mag=9.92 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1011 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:21:36.23 -30:48:58.1: 10.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:36.23 -30:48:58.1: ref_mag=10.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.7168 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:20:06.53 -29:48:13.8: 11.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:20:06.53 -29:48:13.8: 11.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:06.53 -29:48:13.8: ref_mag=11.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3764 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out169499.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02034.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out122770.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out136502.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31819.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33152.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86932.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168092_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168092_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168099_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168099_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168100_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168100_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168102_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168102_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168105_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168105_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168117_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168117_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168218_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168218_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168276_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168276_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:58.69 -30:28:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168287_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168287_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168398_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168398_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:10.05 -33:08:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168472_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168472_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168532_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168532_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:45.91 -31:23:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168617_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168617_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:44.42 -35:44:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168641_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168641_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:14.80 -36:18:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168642_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168642_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:32.04 -36:09:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168647_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168647_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:25.50 -31:17:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168680_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168680_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:30.14 -35:42:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168704_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168704_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:52.32 -33:52:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168710_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168710_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:41.23 -31:55:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168747_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168747_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:40.32 -29:15:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168754_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168754_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168803_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168803_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:08.32 -33:52:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168852_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168852_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:22.29 -34:09:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168885_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168885_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:31.33 -33:12:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168904_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168904_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:51.77 -30:54:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168912_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168912_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:10.04 -32:21:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168933_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168933_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:49.82 -34:49:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168941_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168941_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:54.85 -29:55:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168957_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168957_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:29.64 -36:07:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168990_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168990_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:53.47 -32:26:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168992_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 168992_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:11.62 -29:24:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169030_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 169030_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169041_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 169041_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:37.40 -28:46:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169045_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 169045_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:14.07 -33:05:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169057_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 169057_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:56.20 -31:59:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169124_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 169124_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:43.15 -35:44:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169173_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 169173_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:16.17 -36:22:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169175_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 169175_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:57.03 -29:01:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169187_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 169187_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:08.91 -31:03:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169259_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 169259_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:06.58 -32:43:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169277_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 169277_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:18.46 -34:39:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169296_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 169296_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:14.09 -29:55:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169428_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 169428_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:19.33 -29:28:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169429_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 169429_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:56.67 -36:10:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169452_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 169452_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:33.93 -33:28:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169481_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 169481_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:06.35 -31:46:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169482_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 169482_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:42.44 -29:22:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169499_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 169499_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:00:48.35 -30:54:56.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.945 6760538665799345408 285.20143449249 -30.91534946096 12.2288 11.0419 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.945#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169526_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 169526_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:04.29 -35:46:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169556_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 169556_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:53.37 -32:00:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10015_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 10015_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:37.80 -36:45:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04687_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 04687_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:28.31 -37:54:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01917_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 01917_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:23.12 -38:43:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122770_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
Preparing report for the candidate 122770_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21908_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 21908_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:07.28 -35:28:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33152_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
Preparing report for the candidate 33152_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86932_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
Preparing report for the candidate 86932_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31819_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
Preparing report for the candidate 31819_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98398_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 98398_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:30.85 -31:58:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112222_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 112222_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:22.87 -32:54:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44972_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 44972_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:45.22 -33:05:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72343_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 72343_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113165_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 113165_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:46.45 -30:23:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122231_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 122231_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:38.44 -30:29:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18962_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 18962_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:26.11 -35:52:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87501_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 87501_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:46.36 -29:58:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21623_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 21623_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:34.71 -35:33:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86721_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 86721_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:09.55 -29:55:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43462_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 43462_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71260_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 71260_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58691_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 58691_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:38.25 -29:38:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115629_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 115629_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:07.93 -29:21:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78025_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 78025_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94121_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 94121_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:57.32 -31:14:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02034_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
Preparing report for the candidate 02034_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23807_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 23807_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:26.49 -35:17:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122105_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 122105_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:20.78 -31:14:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48646_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 48646_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114260_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 114260_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:59.32 -33:50:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133381_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 133381_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:55.82 -29:49:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120799_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 120799_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:37.15 -31:24:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113480_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 113480_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:13.69 -32:37:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46103_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 46103_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:42.09 -32:44:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26932_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 26932_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138375_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 138375_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:10.09 -34:21:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78875_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 78875_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12121_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 12121_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:41.10 -36:48:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98636_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 98636_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:07.27 -32:15:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112798_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 112798_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:52.21 -33:56:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98024_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 98024_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:09.94 -32:04:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164704_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 164704_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:33.93 -32:07:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41461_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 41461_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112383_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 112383_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:52.66 -37:12:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118620_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 118620_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:08.34 -29:58:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118410_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 118410_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:43.29 -35:17:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156862_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 156862_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:57.31 -37:37:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150208_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 150208_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:50.25 -32:16:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124902_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 124902_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:48.36 -31:47:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76336_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 76336_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06292_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 06292_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:07.02 -37:50:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51332_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 51332_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.58 -29:04:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111724_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 111724_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:53.31 -32:30:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70870_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 70870_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:08.57 -29:49:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124784_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 124784_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:31.71 -37:47:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73261_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 73261_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18135_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 18135_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:31.69 -35:59:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02056_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 02056_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:32.94 -38:46:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77394_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 77394_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:52.84 -31:33:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136502_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
Preparing report for the candidate 136502_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110991_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 110991_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:09.93 -32:16:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70866_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 70866_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123254_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 123254_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:42.40 -35:03:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75643_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 75643_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72215_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 72215_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:31.75 -30:20:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03820_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 03820_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:06.38 -38:21:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61885_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 61885_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:57.36 -31:08:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93830_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 93830_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:39.15 -31:06:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148644_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 148644_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:37.44 -31:12:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70598_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 70598_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129010_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 129010_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:53.54 -36:27:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122390_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 122390_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:59.33 -35:48:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45027_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 45027_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:12:35.82 -32:51:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115749_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097
The candidate 115749_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_00-16-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks
