This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.3706 2461229.8706 14.19 15:13:41.98 +80:49:40.0
116.47710 34.44083 galactic UMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.8" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 15:13:41.98 +80:49:40.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits at 15:13:41.98 +80:49:40.0: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 15:13:41.98 +80:49:40.0: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461229.8706,14.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260708.3706 14.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.3706 2461229.8706 14.50 14:29:27.94 +80:23:32.4
118.03622 35.78504 galactic UMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.8" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 14:29:27.94 +80:23:32.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits at 14:29:27.94 +80:23:32.4: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 14:29:27.94 +80:23:32.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461229.8706,14.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260708.3706 14.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.87619966 16.04.2026 09:01:33.651 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
First image: 2461146.87619966 16.04.2026 09:01:33.651 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Last image: 2461229.87087299 08.07.2026 08:53:53.426 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9034
Objects passed selection criteria: 8992
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6447.25
Average stars matched: 5941 (92.1478 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114336 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 7 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-138-g473912fb
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 8 04:02:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.87619966 16.04.2026 09:01:33.651 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
First image: 2461146.87619966 16.04.2026 09:01:33.651 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Last image: 2461229.87087299 08.07.2026 08:53:53.426 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 64
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 52910
Objects passed selection criteria: 52764
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 40045.5
Average stars matched: 36745.8 (91.76 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 150884 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 7 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-138-g473912fb
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 8 04:04:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461229.87027063
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits'
wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits'
wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits'
wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:58.844 +77:29:54.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:43.138 +77:30:14.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:58.844 +77:29:54.08
Second-epoch image center 15:59:43.138 +77:30:14.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0153 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:42.973 +77:30:20.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:58.844 +77:29:54.08
Second-epoch image center 15:59:42.973 +77:30:20.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0160 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:59:43.138 +77:30:14.66
Second-epoch second image center 15:59:42.973 +77:30:20.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00155 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00155 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9qPeij6V2D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uh5xLHNrb0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PAHiUWNoe8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4DjqoDCVxU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10709 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.3099 to 286.0223 deg, Dec +70.2817 to +82.8104 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.3099 to 286.0223 deg, Dec 70.2817 to 82.8104 deg
Loaded 12727 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6337 out of 6670 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6670 out of 10709 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.811800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.811800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10709 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.3099 to 286.0223 deg, Dec +70.2817 to +82.8104 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.3099 to 286.0223 deg, Dec 70.2817 to 82.8104 deg
Loaded 12727 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6337 out of 6670 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6670 out of 10709 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 10691 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.5798 to 286.0229 deg, Dec +70.2818 to +82.8120 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.5798 to 286.0229 deg, Dec 70.2818 to 82.8120 deg
Loaded 12695 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6327 out of 6671 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6671 out of 10691 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
2.2 pix UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
2.2 pix wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
15.3 mag. UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
14.5 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
14.4 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9qPeij6V2D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=749, bad_region=2682, passed=10706
Got 10706 stars (including 7467 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10706 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=279 n_q2=163 n_q3=296 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uh5xLHNrb0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=761, bad_region=2666, passed=10690
Got 10690 stars (including 7457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10690 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=276 n_q2=162 n_q3=300 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.292
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PAHiUWNoe8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=306, bad_region=1191, passed=6133
Got 6133 stars (including 4678 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6133 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.8 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.8 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.410 n_q1=344 n_q2=182 n_q3=280 n_q4=160 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4DjqoDCVxU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=313, bad_region=1183, passed=6115
Got 6115 stars (including 4667 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6115 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.8 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.8 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=334 n_q2=184 n_q3=287 n_q4=160 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.161
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.164
ref2=UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits sigma_overall=0.364 worst_q_ratio=1.292
new1=fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits sigma_overall=0.411 worst_q_ratio=1.185
new2=fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits sigma_overall=0.417 worst_q_ratio=1.161
reference average sigma_overall=0.3695 worst_q_ratio=1.228
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:58.844 +77:29:54.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:43.138 +77:30:14.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:58.844 +77:29:54.08
Second-epoch image center 15:59:43.138 +77:30:14.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0153 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:42.973 +77:30:20.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:58.844 +77:29:54.08
Second-epoch image center 15:59:42.973 +77:30:20.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0160 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:59:43.138 +77:30:14.66
Second-epoch second image center 15:59:42.973 +77:30:20.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00155 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00155 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RhS5nNhdE4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NzXkrbZ6UO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jqfTqe0k95
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits &> /tmp/tmp.amFeyUbTbw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 63501 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.2621 to 286.2827 deg, Dec +70.2817 to +82.8104 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.2621 to 286.2827 deg, Dec 70.2817 to 82.8104 deg
Loaded 12774 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5857 out of 6787 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6787 out of 63501 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.684000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.684000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 63501 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.2621 to 286.2827 deg, Dec +70.2817 to +82.8104 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.2621 to 286.2827 deg, Dec 70.2817 to 82.8104 deg
Loaded 12774 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5857 out of 6787 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6787 out of 63501 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 63033 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.0819 to 286.1495 deg, Dec +70.2818 to +82.8120 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.0819 to 286.1495 deg, Dec 70.2818 to 82.8120 deg
Loaded 12773 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5840 out of 6786 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6786 out of 63033 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 51 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
2.1 pix UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
2.0 pix wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
15.5 mag. UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
14.6 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
14.6 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.RhS5nNhdE4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=3725, bad_region=14920, passed=63480
Got 63480 stars (including 45684 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63480 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.385 n_q1=282 n_q2=167 n_q3=301 n_q4=210 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.315
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NzXkrbZ6UO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=3819, bad_region=14777, passed=63019
Got 63019 stars (including 45340 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63019 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49199 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49198 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49198 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.368 n_q1=284 n_q2=168 n_q3=299 n_q4=209 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.356
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jqfTqe0k95 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1522, bad_region=4710, passed=37098
Got 37098 stars (including 31133 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37098 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.425 n_q1=345 n_q2=190 n_q3=266 n_q4=166 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.138
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.amFeyUbTbw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1654, bad_region=4681, passed=36746
Got 36746 stars (including 30744 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36746 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32574 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32574 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32574 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.414 n_q1=340 n_q2=188 n_q3=268 n_q4=168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_040018_TTUQ2b1x1_1852037_Od4ksIeg/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits at 16:25:43.82 +77:55:14.8: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits at 15:59:45.41 +76:04:36.3: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits at 16:59:56.58 +78:51:37.1: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits at 16:13:21.73 +78:02:30.7: 14.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 16:25:43.82 +77:55:14.8: 13.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:43.82 +77:55:14.8: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9610 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 16:13:21.73 +78:02:30.7: 14.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 16:59:56.58 +78:51:37.1: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits at 15:39:21.32 +75:17:06.4: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 15:59:45.41 +76:04:36.3: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:21.73 +78:02:30.7: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0177 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:59:56.58 +78:51:37.1: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8387 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:45.41 +76:04:36.3: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0086 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 15:39:21.32 +75:17:06.4: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:39:21.32 +75:17:06.4: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9807 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits at 15:35:22.07 +76:49:40.5: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits at 15:13:41.98 +80:49:40.0: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 15:35:22.07 +76:49:40.5: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:22.07 +76:49:40.5: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7438 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-01-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0292.fits at 14:29:27.94 +80:23:32.4: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 15:13:41.98 +80:49:40.0: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 14:29:27.94 +80:23:32.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84207.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out85656.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76861_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 76861_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76862_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 76862_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76864_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 76864_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76866_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 76866_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76867_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 76867_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77264_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 77264_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77326_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 77326_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77654_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 77654_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78068_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 78068_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78515_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 78515_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:41.66 +79:46:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79130_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 79130_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:44:28.36 +80:57:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79259_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 79259_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79445_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 79445_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:12.86 +74:15:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79467_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 79467_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:00.68 +76:47:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79478_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 79478_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79512_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 79512_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79642_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 79642_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:33:05.78 +79:38:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79757_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 79757_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:41.78 +77:25:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80074_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 80074_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80105_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 80105_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:53.12 +75:45:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80291_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 80291_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80561_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 80561_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80681_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 80681_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:58:45.11 +76:30:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81347_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 81347_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:09:43.42 +77:01:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81858_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 81858_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:56:29.97 +74:55:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81861_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 81861_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:04:14.17 +76:21:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81873_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 81873_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81982_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 81982_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:24.53 +81:23:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82225_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 82225_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:57.09 +80:50:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82585_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 82585_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82661_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 82661_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:49.08 +80:32:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82686_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 82686_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:23:26.93 +81:20:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82715_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 82715_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:18:25.16 +81:27:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82728_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 82728_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:26.53 +79:24:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83044_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 83044_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:10.04 +78:25:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83058_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 83058_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83397_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 83397_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83434_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 83434_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83838_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 83838_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83853_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 83853_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84207_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
Preparing report for the candidate 84207_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84363_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 84363_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85094_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 85094_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85201_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 85201_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85338_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 85338_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85498_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 85498_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85519_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 85519_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85619_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 85619_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:41:45.78 +78:22:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85656_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
Preparing report for the candidate 85656_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85761_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 85761_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15183_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219
The candidate 15183_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-53-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0219 did not pass the final checks