Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 08.2903  2461229.7903  14.04  13:26:13.71 +72:13:28.6
119.21114  44.65144 galactic  UMi  Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.0" and 0.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 13:26:13.71 +72:13:28.6 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:26:13.71 +72:13:28.6:  15.81 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 13:26:13.71 +72:13:28.6:  15.76 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits


fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits


fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits  wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits -crosshair 773.96808 5441.77783 image    wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits -crosshair 773.91400 5442.15430 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 07 08.29032 13 26 13.71 +72 13 28.6          14.0 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 07 08.29008 13 26 13.17 +72 13 28.4          13.9 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 07 08.29057 13 26 14.26 +72 13 28.8          14.1 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 07 08.2903*  13 26 13.71 +72 13 28.6  14.0 U             UMi       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461229.7903,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260708.2903 14.04CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 08.2903  2461229.7903  14.29  13:50:47.60 +75:21:41.1
117.99780  41.19317 galactic  UMi  Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.6" and 1.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 13:50:47.60 +75:21:41.1 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:50:47.60 +75:21:41.1:  15.93 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 13:50:47.60 +75:21:41.1:  15.96 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits


fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits


fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits  wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits -crosshair 731.99933 3270.97632 image    wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits -crosshair 733.53052 3270.95410 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 07 08.29032 13 50 47.60 +75 21 41.1          14.3 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 07 08.29008 13 50 47.91 +75 21 37.5          14.1 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 07 08.29057 13 50 47.28 +75 21 44.7          14.5 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 07 08.2903*  13 50 47.60 +75 21 41.1  14.3 U             UMi       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461229.7903,14.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260708.2903 14.29CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 08.2903  2461229.7903  14.47  10:56:36.24 +78:07:34.9
130.07498  37.36109 galactic  Dra  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 0.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 10:56:36.24 +78:07:34.9 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:56:36.24 +78:07:34.9:  15.99 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 10:56:36.24 +78:07:34.9:  15.96 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits


fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits


fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits  wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits -crosshair 6803.78809 2683.00854 image    wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits -crosshair 6804.14795 2683.32983 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 07 08.29032 10 56 36.24 +78 07 34.9          14.5 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 07 08.29008 10 56 36.13 +78 07 34.6          14.3 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 07 08.29057 10 56 36.36 +78 07 35.1          14.6 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 07 08.2903*  10 56 36.24 +78 07 34.9  14.5 U             Dra       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461229.7903,14.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260708.2903 14.47CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 08.2903  2461229.7903  14.49  13:56:35.97 +77:06:26.7
118.28436  39.42693 galactic  UMi  Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.4" and 0.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 13:56:35.97 +77:06:26.7 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:56:35.97 +77:06:26.7:  15.89 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 13:56:35.97 +77:06:26.7:  15.91 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits


fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits


fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits  wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits -crosshair 1105.49304 2256.83325 image    wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits -crosshair 1104.96375 2256.84546 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 07 08.29032 13 56 35.97 +77 06 26.7          14.5 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 07 08.29008 13 56 34.87 +77 06 26.4          14.4 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 07 08.29057 13 56 37.08 +77 06 26.9          14.6 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 07 08.2903*  13 56 35.97 +77 06 26.7  14.5 U             UMi       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461229.7903,14.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260708.2903 14.49CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461120.77735586 21.03.2026 06:39:13.546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
First image: 2461120.77735586 21.03.2026 06:39:13.546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Last  image: 2461229.79056641 08.07.2026 06:58:14.938   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  9068
Objects passed selection criteria:  9049
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.1    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.1    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 7226.75
Average stars matched: 7084.5 (98.0316 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   114728 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Jul  7 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-138-g473912fb
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Wed Jul  8 02:04:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461120.77735586 21.03.2026 06:39:13.546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
First image: 2461120.77735586 21.03.2026 06:39:13.546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Last  image: 2461229.79056641 08.07.2026 06:58:14.938   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 125
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 28 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  45670
Objects passed selection criteria:  45584
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.4    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.4    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 40630
Average stars matched: 39541 (97.3197 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   146840 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Jul  7 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-138-g473912fb
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Wed Jul  8 02:06:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cam-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1085464 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1085464 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits_preview.png'

Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits


renamed 'Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits_preview.png'

Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 526.5434
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 511.8510
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1306.5377
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 443.5301
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1309.7477
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 443.3605
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.48135
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 25.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-08T01:57:33.0201972' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-08T06:57:33.0201972' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61229.2899655094 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-08T06:57:42.9238414' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61229.2900801273 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =      179.99867036892 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     77.5000773274259 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     28.9833333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =             346.2675 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.05730480975048 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cam-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29523 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29523 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 15.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 53.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               903.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 25.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 25.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            23.801904 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            14.801184 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits :)

Spent 0.820989 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 25.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-08T01:58:14.9383240' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-08T06:58:14.9383240' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61229.2904506712 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-08T06:58:24.8406923' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61229.2905652779 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =      179.99867056733 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     77.5000773412207 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     28.9486111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     346.286388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.05953954812597 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cam-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29523 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29523 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 15.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 53.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               903.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 25.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 25.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            23.801904 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            14.801184 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits :)

Spent 0.915055 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits



fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461229.79008125
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits'
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:57.041 +77:30:09.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:01:12.409 +77:30:46.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:57.041 +77:30:09.24
Second-epoch image center 12:01:12.409 +77:30:46.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0687 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:01:13.498 +77:30:49.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:57.041 +77:30:09.24
Second-epoch image center 12:01:13.498 +77:30:49.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0698 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  12:01:12.409 +77:30:46.90
Second-epoch second image center 12:01:13.498 +77:30:49.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00123 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00123 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xcTgYDVg9v
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nS2a7cnDkv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9FJYT72maA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OWYKZqVrUy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.7297 to 226.3096 deg, Dec +70.5565 to +82.7610 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.7297 to 226.3096 deg, Dec 70.5565 to 82.7610 deg
Loaded 10549 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5474 out of 5706 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5706 out of 9444 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.849550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.849550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.25

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.25

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.7297 to 226.3096 deg, Dec +70.5565 to +82.7610 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.7297 to 226.3096 deg, Dec 70.5565 to 82.7610 deg
Loaded 10549 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5474 out of 5706 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5706 out of 9444 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 9473 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.7029 to 226.3096 deg, Dec +70.6526 to +82.7825 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.7029 to 226.3096 deg, Dec 70.6526 to 82.7825 deg
Loaded 10453 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5483 out of 5706 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5706 out of 9473 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.3 pix  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
 2.3 pix  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
 2.3 pix  wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
 2.3 pix  wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.3 mag.  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
 15.3 mag.  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
 14.5 mag.  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
 14.5 mag.  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.5 (SNR )  11.5 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xcTgYDVg9v (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=593, bad_region=0, passed=9444
Got 9444 stars (including 8840 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9389 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=208 n_q2=238 n_q3=265 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nS2a7cnDkv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=586, bad_region=0, passed=9473
Got 9473 stars (including 8874 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.7 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.7 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.353 n_q1=198 n_q2=243 n_q3=270 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9FJYT72maA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=300, bad_region=0, passed=5111
Got 5111 stars (including 4803 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5111 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5082 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5082 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5082 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=252 n_q2=257 n_q3=253 n_q4=200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.138
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OWYKZqVrUy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=311, bad_region=0, passed=5088
Got 5088 stars (including 4770 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5088 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5067 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5067 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=246 n_q2=261 n_q3=252 n_q4=203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.111
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.104
ref2=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits sigma_overall=0.343 worst_q_ratio=1.105
new1=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits sigma_overall=0.354 worst_q_ratio=1.138
new2=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits sigma_overall=0.364 worst_q_ratio=1.111
reference average sigma_overall=0.353 worst_q_ratio=1.1045
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20519_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 20519_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    11.26    09:47:03.81 +76:17:12.2   9383 2900   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  09:47:03.85 +76:17:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:57.041 +77:30:09.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:01:12.409 +77:30:46.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:57.041 +77:30:09.24
Second-epoch image center 12:01:12.409 +77:30:46.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0687 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:01:13.498 +77:30:49.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:57.041 +77:30:09.24
Second-epoch image center 12:01:13.498 +77:30:49.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0698 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  12:01:12.409 +77:30:46.90
Second-epoch second image center 12:01:13.498 +77:30:49.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00123 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00123 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0Tq3f74kZI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iAAtHSPrf8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mzNoZosbBa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I47jxZ1YZj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 48477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.4077 to 226.7739 deg, Dec +70.4550 to +82.7776 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.4077 to 226.7739 deg, Dec 70.4550 to 82.7776 deg
Loaded 10786 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5129 out of 5748 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5748 out of 48477 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.734200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.734200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.39

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.39

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 48477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.4077 to 226.7739 deg, Dec +70.4550 to +82.7776 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.4077 to 226.7739 deg, Dec 70.4550 to 82.7776 deg
Loaded 10786 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5129 out of 5748 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5748 out of 48477 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=5.2)
Read 48409 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.4064 to 226.7706 deg, Dec +70.5310 to +82.7825 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.4064 to 226.7706 deg, Dec 70.5310 to 82.7825 deg
Loaded 10696 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5118 out of 5749 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5749 out of 48409 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 114 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
 2.2 pix  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
 1.9 pix  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
 1.9 pix  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.4 mag.  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
 15.4 mag.  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.7 (SNR )  14.1 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0Tq3f74kZI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2481, bad_region=0, passed=48460
Got 48460 stars (including 45910 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48460 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48102 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48101 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48101 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.376 n_q1=215 n_q2=234 n_q3=257 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iAAtHSPrf8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=2526, bad_region=0, passed=48390
Got 48390 stars (including 45783 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48390 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=209 n_q2=239 n_q3=259 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mzNoZosbBa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1097, bad_region=20, passed=33433
Got 33433 stars (including 32258 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33433 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33250 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33250 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33250 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=248 n_q2=267 n_q3=244 n_q4=206 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.I47jxZ1YZj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1082, bad_region=10, passed=33494
Got 33494 stars (including 32343 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33494 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=245 n_q2=273 n_q3=241 n_q4=205 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:11:21.31 +76:31:01.2:  15.32 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:38:57.86 +80:04:31.1:  13.35 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:25:21.07 +75:42:05.8:  13.86 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 14:05:45.18 +75:09:08.5:  12.74 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:36:38.89 +80:48:31.0:  13.47 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:10:48.05 +76:50:55.9:  14.02 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 14:29:50.25 +78:23:32.0:  13.21 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 11:38:57.86 +80:04:31.1:  13.39 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 12:25:21.07 +75:42:05.8:  13.78 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:38:57.86 +80:04:31.1: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5658 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 12:11:21.31 +76:31:01.2:  15.04 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.81 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:25:21.07 +75:42:05.8: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0639 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.15 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:11:21.31 +76:31:01.2: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6262 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 14:05:45.18 +75:09:08.5:  12.70 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 12:36:38.89 +80:48:31.0:  13.53 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:05:45.18 +75:09:08.5: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1458 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:36:38.89 +80:48:31.0: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9968 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 12:10:48.05 +76:50:55.9:  13.92 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 14:29:50.25 +78:23:32.0:  13.24 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:10:48.05 +76:50:55.9: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1814 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:29:50.25 +78:23:32.0: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5241 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:23:40.84 +78:21:06.1:  11.72 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 14:51:35.69 +78:14:31.6:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:55:25.72 +79:40:16.1:  11.52 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:35:09.32 +75:45:17.6:  11.96 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 10:23:40.84 +78:21:06.1:  11.73 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 14:51:35.69 +78:14:31.6:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:35.69 +78:14:31.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:23:40.84 +78:21:06.1: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8441 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:36:48.91 +75:42:52.7:  11.70 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:12:26.19 +78:05:14.0:  12.01 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 11:55:25.72 +79:40:16.1:  11.55 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.54 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:55:25.72 +79:40:16.1: ref_mag=11.54 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8901 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 10:36:48.91 +75:42:52.7:  11.70 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:36:48.91 +75:42:52.7: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0815 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 10:35:09.32 +75:45:17.6:  12.02 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 11:12:26.19 +78:05:14.0:  12.00 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:35:09.32 +75:45:17.6: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9579 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:12:26.19 +78:05:14.0: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3690 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:07:05.48 +74:58:50.5:  12.11 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:15:09.03 +75:04:37.5:  12.76 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 09:57:29.21 +80:45:42.0:  12.97 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 10:15:09.03 +75:04:37.5:  12.75 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.76 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:15:09.03 +75:04:37.5: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0320 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 09:26:46.95 +80:53:54.2:  12.76 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:01:23.10 +74:26:01.6:  12.88 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 11:07:05.48 +74:58:50.5:  12.14 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:07:05.48 +74:58:50.5: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6448 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 09:57:29.21 +80:45:42.0:  12.95 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:57:29.21 +80:45:42.0: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2136 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 09:26:46.95 +80:53:54.2:  12.70 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 11:01:23.10 +74:26:01.6:  12.84 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:21:11.82 +77:00:15.6:  13.25 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:26:46.95 +80:53:54.2: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1590 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:01:23.10 +74:26:01.6: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0442 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 10:21:11.82 +77:00:15.6:  13.28 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:13:43.23 +77:37:27.2:  13.41 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:21:11.82 +77:00:15.6: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3215 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:32:00.44 +74:50:11.7:  13.26 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:33:29.43 +75:11:25.6:  13.30 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 11:13:43.23 +77:37:27.2:  13.41 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 12:32:00.44 +74:50:11.7:  13.31 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:13:43.23 +77:37:27.2: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4500 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:32:00.44 +74:50:11.7: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3137 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:03:13.68 +73:24:21.3:  13.02 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 12:33:29.43 +75:11:25.6:  13.28 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:33:29.43 +75:11:25.6: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3647 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:04:51.73 +78:40:31.6:  13.22 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 11:03:13.68 +73:24:21.3:  13.04 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:03:13.68 +73:24:21.3: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3728 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 10:04:51.73 +78:40:31.6:  13.12 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:04:51.73 +78:40:31.6: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4940 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:01:30.27 +78:51:03.6:  13.56 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:10:34.05 +80:57:27.1:  13.95 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:55:09.16 +80:28:15.5:  13.71 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 11:01:30.27 +78:51:03.6:  13.58 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 14:48:39.13 +78:21:10.9:  13.83 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:01:30.27 +78:51:03.6: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8263 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 11:10:34.05 +80:57:27.1:  13.86 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.90 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:34.05 +80:57:27.1: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9729 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 10:55:09.16 +80:28:15.5:  13.82 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:55:09.16 +80:28:15.5: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7778 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 14:48:39.13 +78:21:10.9:  13.73 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.78 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:39.13 +78:21:10.9: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8839 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:26:13.71 +72:13:28.6:  15.81 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:50:47.60 +75:21:41.1:  15.93 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 13:26:13.71 +72:13:28.6:  15.76 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:37:11.92 +77:51:12.4:  14.23 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:39:52.87 +78:58:29.5:  13.64 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 13:50:47.60 +75:21:41.1:  15.96 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:42:55.19 +76:51:51.6:  14.14 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 12:39:52.87 +78:58:29.5:  13.67 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:39:52.87 +78:58:29.5: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2191 delta=-0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 10:37:11.92 +77:51:12.4:  14.15 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.19 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:11.92 +77:51:12.4: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2071 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:56:36.24 +78:07:34.9:  15.99 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 10:42:55.19 +76:51:51.6:  14.20 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:42:55.19 +76:51:51.6: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2367 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:57:14.90 +74:13:09.7:  14.41 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 10:56:36.24 +78:07:34.9:  15.96 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:56:35.97 +77:06:26.7:  15.89 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 13:56:35.97 +77:06:26.7:  15.91 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 13:57:14.90 +74:13:09.7:  14.31 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.36 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:57:14.90 +74:13:09.7: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2788 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53943.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53966.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54050.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54058.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 39s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53375_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53375_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    14.67    12:11:20.88 +76:30:58.9   4395 3762   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.60    12:11:21.74 +76:31:03.6   4395 3762   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53381_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53381_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.13    11:00:39.43 +78:00:25.4   6694 2779   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53383_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53383_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    14.17    12:10:48.30 +76:50:56.2   4435 3565   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.19    12:10:47.81 +76:50:55.6   4436 3566   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53385_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53385_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.16    10:18:32.04 +80:24:55.8   7438 1053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53387_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53387_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    14.03    12:25:20.85 +75:42:05.8   3826 4178   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.11    12:25:21.29 +75:42:05.8   3826 4179   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53392_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53392_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    13.99    12:36:38.78 +80:48:29.9   4077 1093   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.01    12:36:39.01 +80:48:32.1   4078 1093   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53396_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53396_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.80    10:12:05.99 +81:23:10.8   7361 0448   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  10:12:05.68 +81:23:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53397_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53397_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    13.59    11:38:58.02 +80:04:30.9   5468 1666   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.54    11:38:57.71 +80:04:31.4   5469 1667   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53398_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53398_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    13.45    14:29:50.27 +78:23:31.2   0690 0994   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.65    14:29:50.23 +78:23:32.9   0691 0994   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53399_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53399_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    13.14    14:05:45.15 +75:09:09.0   0169 3069   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.15    14:05:45.20 +75:09:08.1   0170 3070   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53430_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53430_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    10.21    09:21:04.57 +79:18:05.1   9118 0903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53466_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53466_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    11.25    12:25:59.36 +80:36:01.6   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53471_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53471_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    11.28    09:47:03.80 +76:17:12.0   9383 2900   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  09:47:03.85 +76:17:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53489_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53489_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    11.64    13:52:25.96 +79:39:50.7   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53495_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53495_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    11.75    14:51:35.63 +78:14:31.9   0127 0599   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    11.75    14:51:35.75 +78:14:31.2   0127 0600   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53509_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53509_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    11.84    10:23:40.86 +78:21:06.2   7743 2271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    11.84    10:23:40.82 +78:21:06.0   7744 2272   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53511_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53511_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    11.87    11:55:25.62 +79:40:16.5   5031 1907   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    11.91    11:55:25.83 +79:40:15.8   5031 1908   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53521_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53521_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    12.00    12:24:03.37 +79:39:12.4   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53522_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53522_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    11.94    10:35:09.30 +75:45:17.4   7875 3883   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    11.98    10:35:09.33 +75:45:17.8   7876 3883   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53526_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53526_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    11.98    11:52:41.80 +74:39:56.6   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53536_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53536_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    12.08    10:36:48.89 +75:42:52.3   7823 3924   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    12.08    10:36:48.92 +75:42:53.0   7824 3925   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53558_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53558_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    12.28    10:30:48.51 +75:48:08.4   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53560_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53560_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    12.35    11:12:26.12 +78:05:14.1   6323 2792   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    12.39    11:12:26.25 +78:05:13.9   6323 2793   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53572_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53572_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    12.58    11:35:54.40 +79:57:25.6   5551 1735   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53573_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53573_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    12.41    09:59:19.54 +79:16:26.9   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53584_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53584_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    12.65    09:22:00.88 +80:39:55.6   8616 0241   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53592_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53592_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    12.70    14:33:05.38 +79:38:45.0   1116 0354   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  14:33:05.33 +79:38:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53601_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53601_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    12.76    13:41:01.74 +80:11:22.5   2447 0878   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  13:41:01.78 +80:11:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53602_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53602_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    12.61    09:34:16.29 +80:20:12.1   8468 0581   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  09:34:16.18 +80:20:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53616_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53616_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    12.88    10:10:16.46 +74:14:23.3   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53619_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53619_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    12.87    13:11:43.45 +80:27:50.7   3194 1041   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  13:11:43.44 +80:27:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53624_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53624_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    12.73    11:07:05.75 +74:58:50.4   6794 4615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    12.59    11:07:05.22 +74:58:50.6   6795 4616   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53630_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53630_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    12.76    11:21:18.58 +73:47:39.1   6318 5403   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53642_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53642_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.00    10:00:02.43 +78:10:25.5   8461 2085   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  10:00:02.52 +78:10:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53648_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53648_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    12.95    10:15:08.79 +75:04:35.2   8739 4015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.17    10:15:09.27 +75:04:39.8   8739 4015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53651_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53651_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.11    10:55:01.08 +80:44:47.3   6515 1128   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  10:55:01.10 +80:44:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53658_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53658_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.00    10:51:03.47 +82:25:56.9   6374 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  10:51:03.50 +82:25:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53661_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53661_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    13.14    09:57:29.14 +80:45:42.0   7832 0645   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.32    09:57:29.27 +80:45:42.0   7833 0646   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53673_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53673_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.23    13:04:20.07 +81:22:26.2   3548 0586   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  13:04:20.05 +81:22:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53677_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53677_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    13.21    09:26:46.75 +80:53:54.6   8438 0192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.12    09:26:47.16 +80:53:53.8   8438 0192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53692_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53692_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    13.11    11:01:23.00 +74:26:01.4   7077 4902   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    12.99    11:01:23.19 +74:26:01.9   7077 4902   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53696_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53696_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.27    12:01:06.42 +78:13:26.1   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53717_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53717_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.16    12:39:44.32 +72:50:12.1   2904 5762   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53720_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53720_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    13.32    10:21:11.46 +77:00:15.3   8103 3007   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.32    10:21:12.19 +77:00:15.8   8103 3008   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53723_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53723_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.29    11:36:33.60 +75:06:54.2   5646 4649   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  11:36:33.55 +75:06:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53726_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53726_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.56    09:11:07.49 +79:09:23.4   9402 0802   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  09:11:07.48 +79:09:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53741_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53741_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    13.39    11:13:43.14 +77:37:27.2   6321 3074   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.52    11:13:43.31 +77:37:27.3   6322 3075   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53746_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53746_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.51    11:46:14.66 +80:40:01.4   5281 1312   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53748_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53748_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    13.32    12:32:00.49 +74:50:12.6   3480 4645   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.31    12:32:00.39 +74:50:10.8   3480 4646   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53749_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53749_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.46    12:01:18.76 +80:48:38.1   4919 1213   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53750_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53750_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.14    13:07:30.29 +71:20:42.7   1398 6272   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53754_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53754_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.54    10:57:15.51 +74:22:19.6   7250 4907   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  10:57:15.26 +74:22:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53755_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53755_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    13.34    11:03:13.42 +73:24:20.9   7116 5529   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.41    11:03:13.94 +73:24:21.7   7116 5529   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53757_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53757_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    13.38    12:33:29.41 +75:11:25.7   3466 4424   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.35    12:33:29.45 +75:11:25.5   3466 4425   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53758_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53758_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.55    13:06:46.80 +81:27:21.4   3513 0520   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53762_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53762_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    13.52    10:04:51.74 +78:40:32.4   8197 1873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.47    10:04:51.71 +78:40:30.9   8197 1873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53766_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53766_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.57    10:23:47.95 +78:20:02.7   7744 2283   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  10:23:47.94 +78:20:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53775_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53775_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.57    10:59:45.69 +79:39:34.8   6529 1796   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  10:59:45.74 +79:39:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53786_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53786_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.60    10:40:36.29 +74:53:00.6   7826 4448   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  10:40:36.48 +74:53:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53792_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53792_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.51    11:44:31.16 +73:50:51.1   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53794_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53794_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.71    08:57:53.83 +79:59:02.3   9367 0177   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53795_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53795_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.85    10:28:32.44 +81:12:23.0   7046 0687   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  10:28:32.63 +81:12:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53796_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53796_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.72    10:46:57.37 +78:56:24.8   6975 2139   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53799_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53799_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.63    12:50:21.54 +71:52:24.5   2283 6211   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53808_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53808_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.62    12:04:36.95 +80:22:15.1   4818 1472   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  12:04:36.99 +80:22:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53817_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53817_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.86    11:03:38.21 +82:14:25.6   6149 0279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53823_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53823_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.60    10:43:08.30 +76:52:22.7   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53830_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53830_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.69    11:39:17.82 +75:02:03.0   5542 4702   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  11:39:18.01 +75:02:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53838_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53838_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    13.76    11:01:30.66 +78:51:04.1   6573 2284   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.94    11:01:29.89 +78:51:03.0   6574 2285   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53844_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53844_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.81    12:49:00.44 +79:12:00.7   3530 1956   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  12:49:00.27 +79:12:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53848_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53848_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.81    09:51:16.30 +78:36:35.4   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53858_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53858_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.56    12:04:49.35 +81:25:18.0   4865 0838   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  12:04:48.94 +81:25:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53866_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53866_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    13.84    10:55:09.05 +80:28:15.0   6546 1291   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.73    10:55:09.26 +80:28:16.0   6547 1291   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53867_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53867_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.73    12:34:34.85 +76:02:08.5   3531 3918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  12:34:34.91 +76:02:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53868_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53868_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    13.87    11:10:34.33 +80:57:25.9   6124 1072   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.18    11:10:33.76 +80:57:28.2   6124 1072   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53871_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53871_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.93    12:03:13.52 +72:26:18.6   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53877_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53877_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.80    14:55:00.10 +79:11:54.5   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53880_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53880_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    13.90    14:48:38.99 +78:21:11.2   0241 0617   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.87    14:48:39.28 +78:21:10.6   0241 0617   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53895_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53895_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.97    13:42:06.61 +81:20:19.9   2754 0252   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  13:42:06.14 +81:20:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53909_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53909_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.08    14:01:14.78 +79:22:01.2   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53922_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53922_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.20    14:13:01.40 +79:31:13.3   1504 0761   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  14:13:01.42 +79:31:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53931_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53931_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.35    11:27:29.67 +82:37:14.0   5648 0113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53943_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 53943_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53952_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53952_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.07    10:25:52.90 +72:39:25.5   8840 5554   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53959_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53959_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.06    11:48:38.19 +82:19:32.7   5236 0307   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  11:48:37.84 +82:19:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53966_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 53966_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53968_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53968_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    14.20    10:37:12.10 +77:51:12.8   7436 2691   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.22    10:37:11.74 +77:51:12.0   7437 2691   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53971_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53971_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.59    10:28:28.81 +79:17:49.8   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53984_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53984_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    14.22    12:39:52.73 +78:58:30.6   3748 2152   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.22    12:39:53.00 +78:58:28.5   3749 2153   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53985_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53985_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.15    10:24:39.06 +79:38:37.7   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53990_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 53990_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.10    10:34:13.98 +73:55:28.9   8244 4933   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54028_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 54028_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    14.26    10:42:55.50 +76:51:51.5   7419 3317   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.21    10:42:54.89 +76:51:51.6   7420 3317   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54029_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 54029_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    13.98    12:21:49.14 +73:58:12.5   3795 5233   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54043_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 54043_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.60    12:13:40.21 +76:12:03.4   4292 3942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54048_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 54048_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.62    14:24:57.02 +78:35:27.4   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54050_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 54050_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54051_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 54051_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.10    11:29:08.96 +79:59:05.1   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54052_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 54052_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.43    11:34:03.58 +80:06:39.6   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54053_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 54053_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 08.29008    2461229.79008    14.28    13:57:14.62 +74:13:08.9   0145 3732   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-57-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.28    13:57:15.19 +74:13:10.5   0145 3732   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54054_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 54054_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.35    13:02:41.34 +72:36:37.0   1871 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54058_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 54058_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54070_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 54070_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.31    11:35:39.64 +81:16:44.9   5524 0936   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  11:35:38.89 +81:16:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54073_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 54073_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.53    10:04:34.99 +80:15:08.2   7805 1002   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54076_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 54076_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.63    12:40:25.01 +76:22:21.8   3371 3674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54080_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 54080_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.48    12:34:44.94 +73:07:56.3   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54086_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 54086_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.50    13:16:18.85 +80:55:50.4   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54092_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 54092_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.33    12:47:15.53 +73:58:04.2   2757 5018   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54104_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 54104_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.68    12:59:24.83 +78:56:19.9   3200 2021   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54105_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 54105_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.31    11:30:52.82 +74:45:45.2   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54114_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 54114_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.87    13:06:09.08 +81:57:53.4   3630 0234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54124_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 54124_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.46    13:08:36.82 +74:12:31.9   1956 4614   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54130_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 54130_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.71    11:26:43.99 +82:21:11.0   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54140_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 54140_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.70    12:29:26.89 +77:27:26.6   3873 3113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54163_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 54163_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 08.29057    2461229.79057    14.90    11:58:31.22 +77:43:56.9   4884 3069   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_020147_TTUQ1b1x1_1218891_VhcITNUW/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-58-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 4s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 49s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
13:26:13.71 +72:13:28.6
13:50:47.60 +75:21:41.1
10:56:36.24 +78:07:34.9
13:56:35.97 +77:06:26.7
########### Completed Cam-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
13:26:13.71 +72:13:28.6
13:50:47.60 +75:21:41.1
10:56:36.24 +78:07:34.9
13:56:35.97 +77:06:26.7
###################################################################################
13:26:13.71 +72:13:28.6  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:50:47.60 +75:21:41.1  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
10:56:36.24 +78:07:34.9  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
13:56:35.97 +77:06:26.7  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
10:56:36.24 +78:07:34.9  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:26:13.71 +72:13:28.6  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:50:47.60 +75:21:41.1  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
13:56:35.97 +77:06:26.7  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
10:56:36.24 +78:07:34.9  -- not a known variable star
13:26:13.71 +72:13:28.6  -- not a known variable star
13:50:47.60 +75:21:41.1  -- not a known variable star
13:56:35.97 +77:06:26.7  -- not a known variable star
Found 4 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
4 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO   ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
10:56:36.24 +78:07:34.9
13:26:13.71 +72:13:28.6
13:50:47.60 +75:21:41.1
13:56:35.97 +77:06:26.7
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461229.79008125 -observatory V36
07:37:32.33 +17:16:11.8 Mercury (4.4mag)
10:02:56.58 +13:34:31.8 Venus (-4.1mag)
04:18:03.82 +21:09:15.3 Mars (1.3mag)
08:14:48.40 +20:17:19.7 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:55:36.52 +03:19:35.7 Saturn (0.7mag)
04:06:50.06 +20:43:58.5 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:17:01.79 +00:20:50.2 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:31:06.19 -23:17:06.1 Pluto (14.4mag)
01:17:53.80 +11:43:44.6 Moon (-10.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul  8 02:04 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461229.79008125:
08:14:49.54 +20:17:17.7 Io (6.1mag)
08:14:53.05 +20:17:02.2 Europa (6.3mag)
08:14:42.35 +20:17:46.3 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:15:16.54 +20:15:40.8 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:13:25.74 +20:00:39.5 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:14:46.90 +20:17:26.3 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:12:47.79 +20:05:38.9 Elara (17.6mag)
08:18:16.63 +20:12:36.3 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:19:53.22 +20:22:07.6 Carme (19.0mag)
00:55:25.10 +03:19:50.4 Titan (8.5mag)
00:55:41.48 +03:19:33.9 Rhea (9.8mag)
00:55:08.78 +03:19:09.0 Iapetus (11.2mag)
00:55:51.08 +03:19:36.9 Hyperion (14.5mag)
00:55:40.00 +03:17:07.5 Phoebe (16.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul  8 02:04 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461229.79008125:
17:43:53.95 -33:25:15.8 JWST
17:34:31.18 +38:12:38.5 Chandra
22:16:04.15 +55:50:02.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul  8 02:04 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461229.79008125 -observatory V36
02:33:18.74 +14:10:42.0 17.9mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:19:33.44 -34:17:58.8 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:23:36.36 -68:06:36.4 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:00:04.92 +32:24:44.7 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:03:43.19 +16:03:21.1 18.0mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
01:35:26.27 +03:51:03.3 15.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:00:43.74 +32:16:58.7 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:10:01.85 +26:56:34.8 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:53:43.87 +29:52:20.7 16.8mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:08:24.76 +04:57:25.0 17.8mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:08:29.51 +21:22:02.2 17.9mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:11:49.45 -11:20:34.8 17.7mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:51:38.80 +67:37:26.3 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
16:35:03.53 -09:51:40.3 13.9mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
07:57:06.69 +65:35:59.7 17.9mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:30:05.28 +29:53:44.4 14.6mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:17:21.65 +15:16:06.5 17.5mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:43:53.35 +38:58:28.1 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:49:38.51 +45:41:07.0 17.9mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
04:47:40.79 -13:53:38.4 15.8mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:32:50.74 +29:24:47.8 18.0mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:12:51.32 -12:42:49.0 16.3mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:53:44.02 +22:31:19.6 17.7mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:43:57.90 +04:01:19.2 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:57:54.36 +79:03:31.1 17.4mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:44:00.15 +45:08:50.9 16.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:24:13.91 +04:09:50.2 16.9mag A/2026 E1
21:15:45.11 -14:22:20.0 7.3mag 10P/Tempel
11:12:30.57 -01:48:07.2 16.1mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:57:10.67 +29:19:33.3 17.8mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
10:03:45.51 +14:39:57.3 17.0mag 63P/Wild
00:47:24.62 -05:07:24.5 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
08:20:28.90 +34:18:19.7 17.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
04:22:23.78 +20:03:44.8 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
02:18:55.24 +10:18:54.6 16.2mag 88P/Howell
06:29:20.21 +30:38:35.7 15.6mag 93P/Lovas
04:14:20.14 +31:01:12.1 16.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
08:03:38.84 +30:55:28.2 15.3mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:44:17.89 +02:01:44.2 16.8mag 124P/Mrkos
04:48:24.01 +20:44:57.2 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
05:32:20.55 +19:43:26.9 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
00:00:56.08 +02:50:56.6 18.0mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
07:05:47.54 +17:27:25.4 15.3mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:15:55.37 -21:17:03.4 15.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
05:25:38.74 +33:28:53.2 15.3mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:09:15.78 +13:52:32.4 14.9mag 169P/NEAT
01:36:02.83 +07:21:15.8 17.7mag 220P/McNaught
16:36:20.24 -08:18:42.4 17.0mag 235P/LINEAR
08:40:54.71 +33:29:06.4 17.9mag 240P/NEAT
20:42:55.27 -49:05:54.2 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
01:53:33.20 +11:07:44.5 15.7mag 260P/McNaught
05:30:59.26 +36:39:51.1 17.4mag 295P/LINEAR
15:06:46.14 +06:14:09.1 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski
08:32:45.45 +19:45:32.2 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:48:30.77 +39:23:10.5 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jul  8 02:04 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.47 -16:06:07.00  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.24 16.32
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50    2026-07-5.01 16.82
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50    2026-07-5.01 16.82
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul  8 02:04 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8  PNV J09550289+6902138  2026-05-18.925  20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6  PNV J00430182+4118166  2026-05-21.8651  18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3  PNV J00423204+4110283  2026-06-26.059  16.6mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul  8 02:04 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
19:50:40.508 -14:03:39.20  AT 2026rxt  2026-06-27.29 22.3691
20:14:51.941 -19:47:37.14  AT 2026rxs  2026-06-27.32 22.6223
19:54:30.441 -12:20:05.25  AT 2026rxr  2026-06-27.29 22.943
19:50:06.276 -14:20:05.45  AT 2026rxq  2026-06-27.29 22.4223
20:24:15.115 -14:54:02.49  AT 2026rxp  2026-06-27.30 22.7076
20:13:27.191 -14:40:06.03  AT 2026rxo  2026-06-27.29 22.6691
19:56:05.430 -13:35:10.73  AT 2026rxn  2026-06-27.29 22.1413
19:56:17.743 -11:30:31.72  AT 2026rxm  2026-06-27.29 22.6872
20:03:19.450 -15:32:02.30  AT 2026rxl  2026-06-27.29 22.9391
20:05:21.459 -21:39:42.16  AT 2026rxk  2026-06-27.32 22.6852
20:07:46.657 -18:35:11.81  AT 2026rxj  2026-06-27.32 21.8981
20:09:49.736 -15:47:53.18  AT 2026rxi  2026-06-27.29 22.2265
20:01:44.888 -17:54:30.80  AT 2026rxh  2026-06-27.29 22.556
19:58:08.151 -12:48:11.48  AT 2026rxg  2026-06-27.29 22.1285
19:51:04.010 -16:21:44.03  AT 2026rxf  2026-06-27.29 21.6384
20:08:57.895 -15:42:27.37  AT 2026rxe  2026-06-27.29 22.4458
20:16:03.652 -18:08:57.19  AT 2026rxd  2026-06-27.29 21.8112
19:54:18.901 -13:18:08.81  AT 2026rxc  2026-06-27.29 22.5302
20:16:23.754 -18:41:15.76  AT 2026rxb  2026-06-27.29 22.5566
20:17:51.178 -15:34:39.75  AT 2026rxa  2026-06-27.30 22.2074
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jul  8 02:04 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Wed Jul  8 02:03:45 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 3 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 9s (0.15 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 46s (0.77 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 58s (0.97 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 119s (1.98 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 16 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 3 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 3 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 4 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 44s (0.73 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 154s (2.57 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 2s (0.03 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 5s (0.08 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 2s (0.03 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 8s (0.13 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 2s (0.03 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 49s (0.82 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 261s (4.35 min)
FIELD_Cam-05-Q1b1x1: 401s (6.68 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 404s (6.73 min)
Finished: Wed Jul  8 02:10:29 CDT 2026