This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.2738 2461229.7738 12.28 20:14:51.93 -13:34:11.4
29.71826 -24.51989 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.125 Liberatrix 0 -0 1 12.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits at 20:14:51.93 -13:34:11.4: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits at 20:14:51.93 -13:34:11.4: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 08.2738* 20 14 51.93 -13 34 11.4 12.3 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461229.7738,12.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260708.2738 12.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.2738 2461229.7738 13.87 20:35:43.42 -14:43:51.1
30.78999 -29.61917 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.479 Caprera 0 -1 1 13.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits at 20:35:43.42 -14:43:51.1: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits at 20:35:43.42 -14:43:51.1: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 08.2738* 20 35 43.42 -14 43 51.1 13.9 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461229.7738,13.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260708.2738 13.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.2738 2461229.7738 13.96 20:25:53.97 -15:23:50.0
29.03390 -27.69706 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1819 Laputa 0 -1 1 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits at 20:25:53.97 -15:23:50.0: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits at 20:25:53.97 -15:23:50.0: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 08.2738* 20 25 53.97 -15 23 50.0 14.0 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461229.7738,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260708.2738 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.2738 2461229.7738 13.96 20:09:35.25 -19:36:39.2
23.02420 -25.68411 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2379 Heiskanen -0 -2 2 14.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits at 20:09:35.25 -19:36:39.2: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits at 20:09:35.25 -19:36:39.2: 14.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 08.2738* 20 09 35.25 -19 36 39.2 14.0 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461229.7738,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260708.2738 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.91620807 12.05.2026 09:59:10.377 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits
First image: 2461172.91620807 12.05.2026 09:59:10.377 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits
Last image: 2461229.77416152 08.07.2026 06:34:37.555 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.14
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8507
Objects passed selection criteria: 8506
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8293.5
Average stars matched: 7958.25 (95.9577 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114248 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 7 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-138-g473912fb
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 8 02:34:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.91620807 12.05.2026 09:59:10.377 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits
First image: 2461172.91620807 12.05.2026 09:59:10.377 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits
Last image: 2461229.77416152 08.07.2026 06:34:37.555 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 108
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 31 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 53823
Objects passed selection criteria: 53755
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 52753.2
Average stars matched: 51515.2 (97.6532 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 157504 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 7 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-138-g473912fb
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 8 02:37:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461229.77349053
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits'
wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:40.218 -17:59:21.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:45.375 -18:02:12.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.218 -17:59:21.17
Second-epoch image center 20:26:45.375 -18:02:12.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0519 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:46.165 -18:02:53.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.218 -17:59:21.17
Second-epoch image center 20:26:46.165 -18:02:53.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0634 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:26:45.375 -18:02:12.92
Second-epoch second image center 20:26:46.165 -18:02:53.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01163 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits &> /tmp/tmp.j96kPYBpFk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3hL7XEjuN5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lrTmqqj9cj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9k3Y2tHVXc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8566 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2410 to 315.0792 deg, Dec -23.2559 to -12.6184 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2410 to 315.0792 deg, Dec -23.2559 to -12.6184 deg
Loaded 8313 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6104 out of 6268 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6268 out of 8566 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.659900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.659900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.14
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8566 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2410 to 315.0792 deg, Dec -23.2559 to -12.6184 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2410 to 315.0792 deg, Dec -23.2559 to -12.6184 deg
Loaded 8313 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6104 out of 6268 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6268 out of 8566 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 9188 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 297.8796 to 315.0015 deg, Dec -23.5148 to -12.1829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 297.8796 to 315.0015 deg, Dec -23.5148 to -12.1829 deg
Loaded 9065 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6297 out of 6415 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6415 out of 9188 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits (aperture=7.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits
3.3 pix Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
3.2 pix fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
3.2 pix fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits
3.3 pix wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits
14.4 mag. Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.j96kPYBpFk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=511, bad_region=0, passed=8566
Got 8566 stars (including 8048 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8566 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8413 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8414 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8414 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.618 n_q1=220 n_q2=273 n_q3=219 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.292
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3hL7XEjuN5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=362, bad_region=0, passed=9188
Got 9188 stars (including 8821 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9188 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=237 n_q2=227 n_q3=256 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lrTmqqj9cj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=314, bad_region=0, passed=7799
Got 7799 stars (including 7484 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7799 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7643 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=239 n_q2=239 n_q3=245 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9k3Y2tHVXc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=336, bad_region=0, passed=7803
Got 7803 stars (including 7461 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7803 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=237 n_q2=239 n_q3=246 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.179
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits sigma_overall=0.478 worst_q_ratio=1.292
ref2=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits sigma_overall=0.305 worst_q_ratio=1.176
new1=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits sigma_overall=0.328 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new2=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits sigma_overall=0.321 worst_q_ratio=1.179
reference average sigma_overall=0.3915 worst_q_ratio=1.234
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430_astrometric_residuals.png (949 matched stars from wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-33-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_014552_TTUQ1b1x1_127180_DwbuW3lE/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0440.fits at 20:58:09.45 -22:06:50.1: 11.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-05-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits at 20:58:09.45 -22:06:50.1: 11.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:09.45 -22:06:50.1: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6860 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21275_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 21275_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:09.38 -22:25:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21282_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 21282_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20679_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 20679_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78264_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78264_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78266_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78266_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78271_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78271_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78272_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78272_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78274_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78274_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78284_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78284_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78285_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78285_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78290_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78290_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:19.65 -22:11:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78291_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78291_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78297_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78297_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78352_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
Preparing report for the candidate 78352_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78406_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78406_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:56:11.48 -22:47:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78407_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78407_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78450_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78450_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78452_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78452_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78457_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78457_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78463_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78463_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78471_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78471_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78485_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78485_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78486_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78486_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78487_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78487_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78489_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78489_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78499_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78499_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78501_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78501_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78514_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78514_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78534_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78534_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78536_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78536_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78542_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78542_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78546_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78546_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78554_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78554_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78556_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78556_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78557_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78557_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78558_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78558_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78573_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
Preparing report for the candidate 78573_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78576_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78576_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78580_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78580_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78581_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78581_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78582_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78582_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78598_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78598_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78608_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78608_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78609_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78609_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78615_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78615_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78617_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78617_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78625_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78625_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78628_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78628_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78633_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78633_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78636_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78636_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78639_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78639_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78644_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78644_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78645_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78645_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78646_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78646_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78654_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78654_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:26:13.19 -13:47:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78655_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78655_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78658_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78658_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78676_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78676_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78678_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78678_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78680_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78680_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78683_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78683_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78690_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78690_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78691_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78691_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78698_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78698_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78702_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78702_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78704_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78704_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78729_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78729_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78730_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78730_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78733_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78733_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78736_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78736_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78738_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
Preparing report for the candidate 78738_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78739_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
Preparing report for the candidate 78739_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78741_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78741_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78763_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78763_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78777_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78777_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:59.49 -15:54:03.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.636 6874494696585250048 302.99786775137 -15.90054552897 15.1287 14.6009 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.636#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78783_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78783_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78788_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78788_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78792_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78792_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78802_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78802_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78833_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78833_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78838_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78838_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78856_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78856_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78858_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 78858_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-34-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks