This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.2643 2461229.7643 11.04 19:18:39.87 -29:11:35.5
8.87775 -18.33011 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia 1 0 1 11.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:18:39.87 -29:11:35.5: 14.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:18:39.87 -29:11:35.5: 14.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461229.7643,11.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260708.2643 11.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.2643 2461229.7643 11.23 19:50:23.04 -34:03:53.4
6.26140 -26.29245 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.455 Bruchsalia 1 0 1 11.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:50:23.04 -34:03:53.4: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:50:23.04 -34:03:53.4: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461229.7643,11.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260708.2643 11.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.2643 2461229.7643 12.41 20:22:38.41 -34:44:08.1
7.39822 -32.90476 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.139 Juewa 1 0 1 12.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:22:38.41 -34:44:08.1: 14.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:22:38.41 -34:44:08.1: 14.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461229.7643,12.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260708.2643 12.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.2643 2461229.7643 13.28 19:38:46.99 -33:11:19.5
6.40229 -23.72686 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1304 Arosa 1 1 1 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:38:46.99 -33:11:19.5: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:38:46.99 -33:11:19.5: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461229.7643,13.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260708.2643 13.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.2643 2461229.7643 7.03 19:55:56.29 -29:11:28.3
11.83771 -25.98800 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 8.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" RR Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
5.400 V 14.000 V 2456816.00000 334.100000000000 M4e-M9e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:55:56.29 -29:11:28.3: 8.83 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:55:56.29 -29:11:28.3: 8.83 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 8.83 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
RR Sgr,2461229.7643,7.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
RR Sgr 20260708.2643 7.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.92132706 12.05.2026 10:06:32.658 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
First image: 2461172.92132706 12.05.2026 10:06:32.658 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Last image: 2461229.76470079 08.07.2026 06:21:00.148 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 13
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.49
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5917
Objects passed selection criteria: 5917
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5500.5
Average stars matched: 5341.75 (97.1139 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111876 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 7 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-138-g473912fb
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 8 01:35:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.92132706 12.05.2026 10:06:32.658 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
First image: 2461172.92132706 12.05.2026 10:06:32.658 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Last image: 2461229.76470079 08.07.2026 06:21:00.148 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 96
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 23 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 47543
Objects passed selection criteria: 47466
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 42056.5
Average stars matched: 40476.8 (96.2437 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 148564 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 7 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-138-g473912fb
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 8 01:38:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461229.76394853
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits'
wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Image size: 937.4'x625.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:35.133 -34:00:44.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Image size: 941.0'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:47.799 -34:03:33.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:35.133 -34:00:44.38
Second-epoch image center 19:49:47.799 -34:03:33.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0641 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Image size: 941.0'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:50.420 -34:02:59.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:35.133 -34:00:44.38
Second-epoch image center 19:49:50.420 -34:02:59.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0648 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:49:47.799 -34:03:33.07
Second-epoch second image center 19:49:50.420 -34:02:59.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01292 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eY7Z6TbZUf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Xut9IXdu64
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ivlVQGr1Wy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sD1WBLvZTM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5975 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4893 to 307.3623 deg, Dec -39.2782 to -28.4969 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4893 to 307.3623 deg, Dec -39.2782 to -28.4969 deg
Loaded 9543 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4789 out of 4877 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4877 out of 5975 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.493600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.493600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.49
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.00
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.00
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5975 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4893 to 307.3623 deg, Dec -39.2782 to -28.4969 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4893 to 307.3623 deg, Dec -39.2782 to -28.4969 deg
Loaded 9543 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4789 out of 4877 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4877 out of 5975 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 5969 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4891 to 307.3630 deg, Dec -39.2652 to -28.4597 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4891 to 307.3630 deg, Dec -39.2652 to -28.4597 deg
Loaded 9574 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4757 out of 4857 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4857 out of 5969 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 12 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
2.4 pix Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
3.4 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
3.4 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.0 mag. Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
14.0 mag. Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.eY7Z6TbZUf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=390, bad_region=0, passed=5975
Got 5975 stars (including 5580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5975 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.775 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.654 n_q1=226 n_q2=210 n_q3=300 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.292
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Xut9IXdu64 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=400, bad_region=0, passed=5969
Got 5969 stars (including 5568 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5969 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.610 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.761 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.654 n_q1=227 n_q2=213 n_q3=296 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.248
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ivlVQGr1Wy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=233, bad_region=0, passed=5074
Got 5074 stars (including 4837 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5074 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.5 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.5 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4993 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4993 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.616 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.350 n_q1=217 n_q2=208 n_q3=298 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.433
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sD1WBLvZTM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=243, bad_region=1, passed=5118
Got 5118 stars (including 4870 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5118 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.5 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.5 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5017 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5017 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=220 n_q2=208 n_q3=300 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.382
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits sigma_overall=0.600 worst_q_ratio=1.292
ref2=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits sigma_overall=0.610 worst_q_ratio=1.248
new1=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits sigma_overall=0.430 worst_q_ratio=1.433
new2=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits sigma_overall=0.430 worst_q_ratio=1.382
reference average sigma_overall=0.605 worst_q_ratio=1.27
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.56 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.57 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216_astrometric_residuals.png (947 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217_astrometric_residuals.png (947 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:46:53.79 -32:10:25.8: 11.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:19:42.80 -30:42:41.2: 11.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:39:24.04 -32:14:34.4: 11.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:18:39.87 -29:11:35.5: 14.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:46:53.79 -32:10:25.8: 11.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:39:24.04 -32:14:34.4: 11.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:53.79 -32:10:25.8: ref_mag=11.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1816 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:19:42.80 -30:42:41.2: 11.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:18:39.87 -29:11:35.5: 14.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:24.04 -32:14:34.4: ref_mag=11.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0642 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:42.80 -30:42:41.2: ref_mag=11.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2144 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20502.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20451_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 20451_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:32:11.23 -31:32:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20456_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 20456_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:48.48 -29:46:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20479_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 20479_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:40.63 -38:52:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20499_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 20499_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:53.95 -31:22:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20502_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
Preparing report for the candidate 20502_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20505_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 20505_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20526_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 20526_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20531_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 20531_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:15.35 -30:57:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20537_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 20537_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03942_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 03942_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:52.41 -31:42:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05893_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 05893_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:56.29 -29:11:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01259_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 01259_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:15.55 -36:38:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:18:39.87 -29:11:35.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Image size: 937.4'x625.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:35.133 -34:00:44.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Image size: 941.0'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:47.799 -34:03:33.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:35.133 -34:00:44.38
Second-epoch image center 19:49:47.799 -34:03:33.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0641 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Image size: 941.0'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:50.420 -34:02:59.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:35.133 -34:00:44.38
Second-epoch image center 19:49:50.420 -34:02:59.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0648 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:49:47.799 -34:03:33.07
Second-epoch second image center 19:49:50.420 -34:02:59.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01292 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L8nDM3fbGZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kLBIsRJkYC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bp0dLSDxMG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits &> /tmp/tmp.j6nbxo4FRo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 50410 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.3814 to 307.3718 deg, Dec -39.2864 to -28.4649 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.3814 to 307.3718 deg, Dec -39.2864 to -28.4649 deg
Loaded 9661 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7406 out of 7913 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7913 out of 50410 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.300650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.300650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 50410 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.3814 to 307.3718 deg, Dec -39.2864 to -28.4649 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.3814 to 307.3718 deg, Dec -39.2864 to -28.4649 deg
Loaded 9661 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7406 out of 7913 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7913 out of 50410 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 50538 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.3840 to 307.3764 deg, Dec -39.2729 to -28.4534 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.3840 to 307.3764 deg, Dec -39.2729 to -28.4534 deg
Loaded 9665 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7408 out of 7932 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7932 out of 50538 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 81 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
3.1 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
3.1 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
14.1 mag. Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.L8nDM3fbGZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2222, bad_region=0, passed=50401
Got 50401 stars (including 48093 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50401 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.578 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.685 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.650 n_q1=227 n_q2=209 n_q3=288 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kLBIsRJkYC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=50533
Got 50533 stars (including 48151 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50533 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50089 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.772 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.655 n_q1=232 n_q2=210 n_q3=287 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.287
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bp0dLSDxMG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1283, bad_region=2, passed=34106
Got 34106 stars (including 32776 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34106 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.5 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.5 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=204 n_q2=208 n_q3=307 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.332
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.j6nbxo4FRo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1303, bad_region=2, passed=34492
Got 34492 stars (including 33135 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34492 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.5 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34071 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.5 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.606 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=208 n_q2=206 n_q3=305 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.428
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-19-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_012802_TTUQ1b1x1_2871729_P5XuHDDR/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:58:25.00 -31:43:54.1: 12.99 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:18:53.28 -38:19:50.5: 12.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:13:16.71 -35:43:56.6: 12.83 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:22:02.39 -31:32:42.9: 12.85 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:20:44.58 -29:26:52.8: 13.08 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:36:20.78 -30:47:18.0: 12.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:19:41.21 -38:36:42.1: 12.86 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:58:25.00 -31:43:54.1: 12.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:26:57.62 -33:11:49.9: 12.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:25.00 -31:43:54.1: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4429 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:18:53.28 -38:19:50.5: 12.42 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:13:16.71 -35:43:56.6: 12.89 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:16:30.22 -32:32:35.5: 12.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:18:53.28 -38:19:50.5: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5312 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:20:44.58 -29:26:52.8: 13.13 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:13:16.71 -35:43:56.6: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.8928 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:44.58 -29:26:52.8: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2735 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:19:41.21 -38:36:42.1: 12.71 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:41.21 -38:36:42.1: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.3884 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:36:20.78 -30:47:18.0: 12.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:36:20.78 -30:47:18.0: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7679 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:16:30.22 -32:32:35.5: 12.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:22:02.39 -31:32:42.9: 12.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:22:02.39 -31:32:42.9: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8749 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:16:30.22 -32:32:35.5: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5474 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:26:57.62 -33:11:49.9: 12.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:57.62 -33:11:49.9: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8247 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:23:04.84 -38:58:05.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:50:23.04 -34:03:53.4: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:23:38.53 -30:14:54.0: 11.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:24:24.20 -29:29:25.1: 12.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:23:04.84 -38:58:05.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:04.84 -38:58:05.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:50:23.04 -34:03:53.4: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:23:38.53 -30:14:54.0: 11.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:38.53 -30:14:54.0: ref_mag=11.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3240 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:22:38.41 -34:44:08.1: 14.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:25:20.32 -29:28:55.5: 12.88 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:01:38.46 -37:57:19.4: 12.88 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:26:11.12 -32:06:34.0: 13.15 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:24:24.20 -29:29:25.1: 12.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:24.20 -29:29:25.1: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.4156 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:25:46.09 -35:24:27.9: 13.27 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:26:31.52 -32:44:57.9: 13.54 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:22:38.41 -34:44:08.1: 14.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:25:20.32 -29:28:55.5: 13.01 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:20.32 -29:28:55.5: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.9646 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:01:38.46 -37:57:19.4: 12.75 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:38.46 -37:57:19.4: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.6452 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:26:11.12 -32:06:34.0: 13.16 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:11.12 -32:06:34.0: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.9897 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:25:46.09 -35:24:27.9: 13.32 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:46.09 -35:24:27.9: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.7852 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:24:45.82 -29:12:46.2: 13.46 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:26:31.52 -32:44:57.9: 13.48 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:31.52 -32:44:57.9: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.0148 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:18:28.46 -28:48:46.3: 13.21 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:24:34.21 -29:47:28.4: 13.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:24:45.82 -29:12:46.2: 13.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:45.82 -29:12:46.2: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.2143 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:24:26.09 -34:15:44.7: 13.46 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:25:13.71 -35:38:50.0: 13.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:25:48.11 -30:18:03.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:18:28.46 -28:48:46.3: 13.19 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:18:28.46 -28:48:46.3: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.1114 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:25:31.48 -30:14:15.2: 13.48 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:23:54.24 -29:38:24.0: 13.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:24:34.21 -29:47:28.4: 13.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:34.21 -29:47:28.4: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.2695 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:24:26.09 -34:15:44.7: 13.35 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:26.09 -34:15:44.7: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.0513 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:25:13.71 -35:38:50.0: 13.39 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:13.71 -35:38:50.0: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.9532 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:25:48.11 -30:18:03.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:48.11 -30:18:03.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:25:31.48 -30:14:15.2: 13.56 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:31.48 -30:14:15.2: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.1837 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:25:04.56 -32:37:33.5: 13.41 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:23:54.24 -29:38:24.0: 13.67 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:54.24 -29:38:24.0: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.1758 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:25:04.97 -29:56:36.1: 13.90 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:17:53.36 -28:37:31.6: 13.39 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:25:04.56 -32:37:33.5: 13.53 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:24:41.42 -29:22:13.6: 13.56 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:04.56 -32:37:33.5: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.9789 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:29:12.82 -29:08:49.8: 13.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:38:46.99 -33:11:19.5: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:25:04.97 -29:56:36.1: 13.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:04.97 -29:56:36.1: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3322 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:25:06.39 -30:53:58.3: 13.51 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:17:53.36 -28:37:31.6: 13.45 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:24:41.42 -29:22:13.6: 13.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:17:53.36 -28:37:31.6: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.1677 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:41.42 -29:22:13.6: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3572 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:29:12.82 -29:08:49.8: 13.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:29:12.82 -29:08:49.8: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3085 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:38:46.99 -33:11:19.5: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:25:06.39 -30:53:58.3: 13.51 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:06.39 -30:53:58.3: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2622 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:26:07.52 -32:24:00.4: 13.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:26:14.05 -32:46:11.6: 13.23 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:21:32.11 -29:12:42.8: 13.81 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:26:07.52 -32:24:00.4: 13.50 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:26:14.05 -32:46:11.6: 13.06 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:07.52 -32:24:00.4: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.0294 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:14.05 -32:46:11.6: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1260 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:21:05.49 -31:14:10.4: 13.50 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:21:23.08 -29:46:11.2: 13.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:21:32.11 -29:12:42.8: 13.78 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:32.11 -29:12:42.8: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3959 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:19:00.89 -29:04:14.9: 13.87 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:21:23.08 -29:46:11.2: 13.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:23.08 -29:46:11.2: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4498 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:21:05.49 -31:14:10.4: 13.65 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:05.49 -31:14:10.4: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.3597 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:19:00.89 -29:04:14.9: 13.87 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:00.89 -29:04:14.9: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.3411 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:23:52.09 -30:19:34.4: 13.49 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:35:49.38 -29:33:06.1: 13.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:24:38.03 -30:27:19.4: 14.05 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:25:34.99 -30:04:54.9: 13.79 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:23:52.09 -30:19:34.4: 13.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:25:32.74 -30:18:00.3: 13.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:52.09 -30:19:34.4: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5428 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:21:22.81 -29:30:52.5: 14.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:35:49.38 -29:33:06.1: 13.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:24:38.03 -30:27:19.4: 13.46 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:35:49.38 -29:33:06.1: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5026 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:38.03 -30:27:19.4: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4393 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:25:34.99 -30:04:54.9: 13.64 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:34.99 -30:04:54.9: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4775 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:22:01.47 -29:11:45.5: 13.61 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:25:32.74 -30:18:00.3: 13.61 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:21:22.81 -29:30:52.5: 14.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:32.74 -30:18:00.3: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5110 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:22:01.47 -29:11:45.5: 13.56 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:01.47 -29:11:45.5: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4297 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:23:21.00 -29:42:11.0: 13.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:16:10.86 -28:56:13.5: 13.93 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:24:38.44 -29:56:30.0: 13.91 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:31:56.81 -30:55:28.2: 14.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:23:21.00 -29:42:11.0: 13.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:21.00 -29:42:11.0: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5750 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:23:19.50 -29:38:37.2: 13.93 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:16:10.86 -28:56:13.5: 13.80 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:16:10.86 -28:56:13.5: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.4964 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:31:56.81 -30:55:28.2: 14.04 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:24:38.44 -29:56:30.0: 13.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:31:56.81 -30:55:28.2: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6161 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:38.44 -29:56:30.0: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7200 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:25:55.92 -31:46:44.9: 13.60 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:23:19.50 -29:38:37.2: 13.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:19.50 -29:38:37.2: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5977 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:21:10.84 -30:56:40.8: 13.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:25:55.92 -31:46:44.9: 13.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:55.92 -31:46:44.9: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2899 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:27:16.96 -35:25:02.9: 12.48 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:21:10.84 -30:56:40.8: 13.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:10.84 -30:56:40.8: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4533 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:27:16.96 -35:25:02.9: 12.63 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:16.96 -35:25:02.9: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.1169 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:24:58.54 -36:52:01.3: 12.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:26:17.74 -38:11:03.8: 12.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:55:56.29 -29:11:28.3: 8.83 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:24:58.54 -36:52:01.3: 12.43 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:58.54 -36:52:01.3: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.0804 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:26:17.74 -38:11:03.8: 12.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:17.74 -38:11:03.8: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.5750 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:55:56.29 -29:11:28.3: 8.83 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 8.83 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:55:56.29 -29:11:28.3: ref_mag=8.83 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=7.0270 delta=1.80 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out66243.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out28505.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65215.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65585.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66056.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64996_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 64996_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64999_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 64999_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65000_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65000_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65005_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65005_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65006_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65006_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65007_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65007_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:33:02.17 -28:53:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65009_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65009_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65011_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65011_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65013_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65013_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65014_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65014_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65154_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65154_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:39.87 -29:11:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65215_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
Preparing report for the candidate 65215_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65221_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65221_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65260_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65260_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65266_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65266_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:44.16 -29:54:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65321_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65321_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:23:44.21 -28:41:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65544_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65544_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65577_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65577_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:29:21.58 -29:41:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65585_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
Preparing report for the candidate 65585_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65640_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65640_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:36.19 -37:36:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65758_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65758_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65795_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65795_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65851_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65851_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65882_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65882_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65887_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65887_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65891_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65891_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:31:39.79 -34:55:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65900_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65900_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65917_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65917_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65933_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65933_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:10.93 -31:15:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65943_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65943_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65948_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65948_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65949_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65949_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65968_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65968_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65976_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 65976_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66013_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66013_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66024_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66024_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66026_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66026_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66036_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66036_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66045_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66045_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66054_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66054_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66056_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
Preparing report for the candidate 66056_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66071_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66071_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66088_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66088_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:23.47 -36:25:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66094_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66094_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66095_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66095_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66099_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66099_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66107_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66107_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66127_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66127_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66133_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66133_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:59.50 -31:14:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66139_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66139_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66145_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66145_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66150_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66150_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66158_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66158_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66172_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66172_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66198_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66198_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66243_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66243_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:22.81 -29:30:52.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.54)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.712 6758632555001555200 290.34480362583 -29.51415529405 12.2982 10.5520 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.712#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66249_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66249_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66253_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66253_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66256_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66256_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66262_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66262_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66264_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66264_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66268_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66268_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66278_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66278_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66287_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 66287_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18353_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 18353_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:42.42 -34:22:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60502_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 60502_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13313_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 13313_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:31:14.07 -35:18:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32431_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 32431_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:52.43 -31:42:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31259_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 31259_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:08.67 -29:49:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47830_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 47830_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:32:11.23 -31:32:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39916_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 39916_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:10.52 -32:36:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07977_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 07977_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:15.54 -36:38:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49791_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 49791_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:38:16.35 -32:16:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60699_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 60699_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:42.38 -32:44:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00680_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 00680_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:40.63 -38:52:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60510_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 60510_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48383_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 48383_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:35.32 -31:45:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01962_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 01962_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28505_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
Preparing report for the candidate 28505_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31421_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 31421_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:27.90 -30:14:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11909_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 11909_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-21-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks