This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.1265 2461229.6265 10.91 17:44:54.70 -06:41:17.9
19.15857 11.53041 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.51 Nemausa 1 -1 2 11.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:44:54.70 -06:41:17.9: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:44:54.70 -06:41:17.9: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461229.6265,10.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260708.1265 10.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.1265 2461229.6265 11.51 17:49:06.44 -06:53:43.1
19.49593 10.52143 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.216 Kleopatra 0 -1 1 11.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:49:06.44 -06:53:43.1: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:49:06.44 -06:53:43.1: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461229.6265,11.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260708.1265 11.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.1265 2461229.6265 13.73 18:29:11.07 -03:07:12.2
27.60976 3.51643 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.663 Gerlinde 2 -1 2 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:29:11.07 -03:07:12.2: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:29:11.07 -03:07:12.2: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 08.1265* 18 29 11.07 -03 07 12.2 13.7 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461229.6265,13.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260708.1265 13.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.1265 2461229.6265 13.97 18:04:23.86 +01:37:03.8
28.97026 11.19754 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.921 Jovita 2 -1 2 13.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:04:23.86 +01:37:03.8: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:04:23.86 +01:37:03.8: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461229.6265,13.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260708.1265 13.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.76690851 16.05.2026 06:24:10.895 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
First image: 2461176.76690851 16.05.2026 06:24:10.895 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Last image: 2461229.62683774 08.07.2026 03:02:28.781 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.95
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7650
Objects passed selection criteria: 7645
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6781.5
Average stars matched: 6606.75 (97.4231 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113436 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 7 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-138-g473912fb
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 7 22:06:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.76690851 16.05.2026 06:24:10.895 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
First image: 2461176.76690851 16.05.2026 06:24:10.895 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Last image: 2461229.62683774 08.07.2026 03:02:28.781 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 142
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 31 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 74560
Objects passed selection criteria: 74453
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 66705
Average stars matched: 63879.8 (95.7646 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1863576 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 7 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-138-g473912fb
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 7 22:09:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461229.62619084
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits'
wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:00.262 -02:00:11.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:43.617 -01:59:31.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:00.262 -02:00:11.96
Second-epoch image center 17:59:43.617 -01:59:31.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0702 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:45.166 -02:00:02.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:00.262 -02:00:11.96
Second-epoch image center 17:59:45.166 -02:00:02.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0629 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:59:43.617 -01:59:31.59
Second-epoch second image center 17:59:45.166 -02:00:02.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01069 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z7VPm27uwS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4M6GgEBc8q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6dL1493YEF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lUPfbpY8hg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7975 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.1369 to 277.8949 deg, Dec -7.2775 to +3.2761 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.1369 to 277.8949 deg, Dec -7.2775 to 3.2761 deg
Loaded 5313 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4214 out of 4368 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4368 out of 7975 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.621250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.621250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.95
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.67
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.67
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7975 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.1369 to 277.8949 deg, Dec -7.2775 to +3.2761 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.1369 to 277.8949 deg, Dec -7.2775 to 3.2761 deg
Loaded 5313 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4214 out of 4368 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4368 out of 7975 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7875 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.1541 to 277.8989 deg, Dec -7.2832 to +3.2727 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.1541 to 277.8989 deg, Dec -7.2832 to 3.2727 deg
Loaded 5309 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4205 out of 4363 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4363 out of 7875 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
2.2 pix Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
2.6 pix fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
2.6 pix fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
14.7 mag. Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.z7VPm27uwS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=521, bad_region=0, passed=7975
Got 7975 stars (including 7444 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7975 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 918 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits N_match=918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.630 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.815 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.772 n_q1=185 n_q2=158 n_q3=282 n_q4=293 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.293
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4M6GgEBc8q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=520, bad_region=0, passed=7875
Got 7875 stars (including 7348 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7875 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7675 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1008)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits N_match=917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.611 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.747 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.726 n_q1=181 n_q2=158 n_q3=279 n_q4=299 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.223
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6dL1493YEF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=385, bad_region=0, passed=5637
Got 5637 stars (including 5245 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5637 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits N_match=911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.423 n_q1=182 n_q2=153 n_q3=315 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lUPfbpY8hg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=9, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=384, bad_region=0, passed=5829
Got 5829 stars (including 5437 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5829 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits N_match=911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=182 n_q2=152 n_q3=313 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits sigma_overall=0.630 worst_q_ratio=1.293
ref2=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits sigma_overall=0.611 worst_q_ratio=1.223
new1=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits sigma_overall=0.429 worst_q_ratio=1.242
new2=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits sigma_overall=0.413 worst_q_ratio=1.188
reference average sigma_overall=0.6205 worst_q_ratio=1.258
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099_astrometric_residuals.png (918 matched stars from wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.55 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100_astrometric_residuals.png (917 matched stars from wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.55 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014_astrometric_residuals.png (911 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015_astrometric_residuals.png (911 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:44:54.70 -06:41:17.9: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:49:06.44 -06:53:43.1: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:44:54.70 -06:41:17.9: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:49:06.44 -06:53:43.1: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20530.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20603.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20430_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20430_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:55.01 +01:33:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20530_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 20530_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20540_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20540_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:10.14 -03:22:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20551_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20551_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:10.98 +02:02:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20558_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20558_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:59.93 +02:48:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20571_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20571_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:45.13 -01:31:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20590_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20590_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:16.71 -01:43:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20603_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 20603_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20607_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20607_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:08.00 -02:56:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20618_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20618_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:56.50 -01:13:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20654_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20654_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:22.05 +01:01:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
17:44:54.70 -06:41:17.9
17:49:06.44 -06:53:43.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:00.262 -02:00:11.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:43.617 -01:59:31.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:00.262 -02:00:11.96
Second-epoch image center 17:59:43.617 -01:59:31.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0702 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:45.166 -02:00:02.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:00.262 -02:00:11.96
Second-epoch image center 17:59:45.166 -02:00:02.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0629 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:59:43.617 -01:59:31.59
Second-epoch second image center 17:59:45.166 -02:00:02.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01069 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wy9YabjmcP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qUD7nKNziW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GAYzjkvTRu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SnZpHJYIXr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 80645 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.1354 to 277.8993 deg, Dec -7.2781 to +3.2791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.1354 to 277.8993 deg, Dec -7.2781 to 3.2791 deg
Loaded 5318 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4029 out of 4682 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4682 out of 80645 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.436000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.436000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.87
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.87
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 80645 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.1354 to 277.8993 deg, Dec -7.2781 to +3.2791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.1354 to 277.8993 deg, Dec -7.2781 to 3.2791 deg
Loaded 5318 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4029 out of 4682 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4682 out of 80645 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 80458 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.1446 to 277.9104 deg, Dec -7.2831 to +3.2730 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.1446 to 277.9104 deg, Dec -7.2831 to 3.2730 deg
Loaded 5316 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4025 out of 4686 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4686 out of 80458 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 132 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
2.0 pix Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
2.4 pix fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
2.4 pix fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
14.9 mag. Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.wy9YabjmcP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=5532, bad_region=2, passed=80633
Got 80633 stars (including 74977 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80633 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79275 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 1010)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits N_match=919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.699 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.698 n_q1=187 n_q2=159 n_q3=275 n_q4=298 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qUD7nKNziW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=5629, bad_region=0, passed=80444
Got 80444 stars (including 74689 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80444 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 918 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits N_match=918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.624 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.800 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.677 n_q1=185 n_q2=156 n_q3=270 n_q4=307 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.283
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GAYzjkvTRu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=2435, bad_region=10, passed=52993
Got 52993 stars (including 50455 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52993 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits N_match=912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.385 n_q1=177 n_q2=149 n_q3=316 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SnZpHJYIXr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2468, bad_region=6, passed=54939
Got 54939 stars (including 52379 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 54939 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.379 n_q1=176 n_q2=152 n_q3=314 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.179
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-01-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220436_TTUQ1b1x1_3891663_5Tds0vYg/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:11:37.23 +02:19:19.0: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:35:18.98 -04:20:34.1: 13.80 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:55:09.10 +02:54:38.7: 13.96 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:00:40.92 +00:55:34.5: 13.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:11:37.23 +02:19:19.0: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:35:18.98 -04:20:34.1: 13.93 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:00:40.92 +00:55:34.5: 13.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:55:09.10 +02:54:38.7: 13.98 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:11:37.23 +02:19:19.0: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7840 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:35:18.98 -04:20:34.1: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9637 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:00:40.92 +00:55:34.5: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6529 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:55:09.10 +02:54:38.7: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9473 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:55:40.73 +02:02:11.5: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:05:07.91 +02:45:34.9: 13.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:06:33.70 +01:34:30.6: 13.35 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:47:22.94 -01:15:52.8: 13.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:55:40.73 +02:02:11.5: 13.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:55:40.73 +02:02:11.5: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1927 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:40:56.77 +02:17:05.9: 13.49 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:06:33.70 +01:34:30.6: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:06:33.70 +01:34:30.6: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4430 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:05:07.91 +02:45:34.9: 13.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:47:22.94 -01:15:52.8: 13.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:05:07.91 +02:45:34.9: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5262 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:47:22.94 -01:15:52.8: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3632 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:46:24.75 +00:15:48.7: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:40:56.77 +02:17:05.9: 13.58 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:40:56.77 +02:17:05.9: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6216 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:46:24.75 +00:15:48.7: 13.28 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:46:24.75 +00:15:48.7: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5550 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:24:53.20 -04:25:48.6: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:46:25.82 +00:28:10.0: 13.47 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:30:51.39 +02:18:08.4: 14.21 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:29:11.07 -03:07:12.2: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:24:53.20 -04:25:48.6: 15.19 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:24:53.20 -04:25:48.6: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=13.7469 delta=1.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:46:25.82 +00:28:10.0: 13.51 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:46:25.82 +00:28:10.0: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6731 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:19:42.92 -03:33:05.9: 14.82 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:25:10.49 -06:38:24.1: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:30:51.39 +02:18:08.4: 14.08 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:29:11.07 -03:07:12.2: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:30:51.39 +02:18:08.4: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7824 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:04:23.86 +01:37:03.8: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:30:15.67 +02:35:57.0: 14.42 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:16:20.19 -05:30:51.5: 14.18 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:19:42.92 -03:33:05.9: 14.61 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:25:10.49 -06:38:24.1: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:19:42.92 -03:33:05.9: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8048 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:04:23.86 +01:37:03.8: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:30:15.67 +02:35:57.0: 14.63 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:30:15.67 +02:35:57.0: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7899 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:28:34.82 -04:40:25.5: 14.05 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:16:20.19 -05:30:51.5: 13.99 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:16:20.19 -05:30:51.5: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.8587 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:34:34.08 +02:30:40.9: 14.69 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:28:34.82 -04:40:25.5: 14.27 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:28:34.82 -04:40:25.5: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7472 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:31:41.26 +02:13:58.7: 14.50 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:34:34.08 +02:30:40.9: 14.16 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:34:34.08 +02:30:40.9: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1158 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:31:41.26 +02:13:58.7: 14.46 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:31:41.26 +02:13:58.7: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.1427 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:05:18.70 +01:10:42.3: 14.69 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:07:09.04 -00:20:24.1: 14.39 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:05:18.70 +01:10:42.3: 14.55 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:05:18.70 +01:10:42.3: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3359 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:29:58.05 -02:09:06.6: 14.31 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:07:09.04 -00:20:24.1: 14.32 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:07:09.04 -00:20:24.1: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2807 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:29:58.05 -02:09:06.6: 14.33 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:29:58.05 -02:09:06.6: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9599 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:43:18.29 -02:04:46.1: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:43:18.29 -02:04:46.1: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:43:18.29 -02:04:46.1: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0569 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out100684.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out100953.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out100699.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101039.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99147_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99147_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99151_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99151_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99161_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99161_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99164_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99164_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:37.75 -00:01:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99167_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99167_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99170_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99170_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:21.75 +02:26:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99172_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99172_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:54.95 +02:38:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99179_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99179_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:31.38 -02:20:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99180_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99180_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:14.41 -00:16:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99186_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99186_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:40:46.20 -00:46:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99189_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99189_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:40.93 -02:53:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99190_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99190_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:36.36 +02:52:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99191_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99191_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:47.74 -02:36:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99192_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99192_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:29.24 -05:40:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99300_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99300_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:54.68 -06:41:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99322_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99322_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:59.92 +02:48:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99325_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99325_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:17.79 +02:29:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99375_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99375_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:06.43 -06:53:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99440_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99440_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:33.42 +01:08:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99526_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99526_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:30.73 +02:46:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99538_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99538_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:32.81 +00:02:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99552_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99552_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:53.16 +02:14:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99562_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99562_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:50.02 -04:11:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99657_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99657_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:50.84 +01:29:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99660_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99660_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:26.54 -01:00:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99686_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99686_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:23.71 +02:39:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99728_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99728_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:47.48 -00:37:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99733_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99733_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:58.40 +00:10:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99752_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99752_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:22.61 +02:13:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99790_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99790_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:40.61 -02:44:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99816_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99816_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:31.96 -01:54:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99817_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99817_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:48.88 +03:11:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99819_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99819_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:34.68 -01:10:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99825_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99825_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:06.39 -02:32:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99830_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99830_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:19.33 +02:36:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99865_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99865_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:48.88 -01:46:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99869_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99869_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:41.31 -01:42:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99882_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99882_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:33.02 -01:52:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99893_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99893_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:32.87 +00:27:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99902_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99902_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:43.23 +02:25:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99906_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99906_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:25.13 +00:33:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99908_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99908_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:52.97 -05:54:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99944_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99944_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:48.55 -06:02:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99946_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99946_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:34.48 -06:50:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99968_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99968_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:44.68 +01:42:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100008_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100008_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:09.86 +01:07:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100010_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100010_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:26.83 -00:44:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100026_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100026_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:38.45 +00:52:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100058_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100058_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:05.80 -05:08:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100062_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100062_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:48.58 +02:26:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100064_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100064_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:42.39 +01:52:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100108_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100108_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:25.76 +01:44:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100110_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100110_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:36.24 -00:26:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100121_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100121_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:10.48 +00:04:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100148_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100148_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:41.36 -07:12:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100165_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100165_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:35.98 -06:31:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100178_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100178_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100216_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100216_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:02.82 +01:35:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100267_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100267_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:32.51 +01:16:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100311_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100311_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:14.38 -01:51:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100323_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100323_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:56.65 -02:46:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100337_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100337_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:13.80 -06:46:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100342_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100342_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:31.42 -07:03:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100363_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100363_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100366_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100366_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100393_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100393_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100401_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100401_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:50.71 -02:34:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100417_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100417_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:52.59 -05:27:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100473_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100473_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:16.43 -07:06:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100515_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100515_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:26.27 +03:06:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100516_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100516_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100536_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100536_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:07.35 -06:45:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100537_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100537_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:29.45 +01:44:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100539_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100539_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:56.90 +00:33:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100587_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100587_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100611_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100611_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:35.46 -06:52:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100628_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100628_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:27.32 -01:31:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100636_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100636_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:32.49 -01:19:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100658_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100658_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:05.54 -01:14:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100669_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100669_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:08.84 +00:29:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100681_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100681_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:56.96 -05:53:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100684_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100684_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:53.20 -04:25:48.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.742 4257436398615666688 276.22243049525 -04.43015650556 13.6087 11.3803 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.742#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100690_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100690_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100692_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100692_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:52.88 -06:12:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100699_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 100699_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100775_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100775_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:48.31 -07:01:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100776_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100776_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:55.00 -00:35:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100807_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100807_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:50.96 -06:30:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100861_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100861_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100896_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100896_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:59.16 -06:27:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100897_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100897_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:40.30 +03:09:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100953_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100953_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:10.49 -06:38:24.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.213 4160058769787911168 276.29472428706 -06.64062059121 13.1840 11.1486 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.213#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100983_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100983_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100998_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100998_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:58.18 -02:15:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101026_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 101026_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101039_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 101039_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101040_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 101040_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:41.31 -06:51:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101056_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 101056_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101087_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 101087_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101102_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 101102_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:17.94 -06:31:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101156_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 101156_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101157_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 101157_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101188_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 101188_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:37.81 +03:09:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101232_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 101232_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:28.48 -05:09:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101242_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 101242_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:12.05 -00:15:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101251_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 101251_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101258_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 101258_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:48.01 -00:52:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101268_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 101268_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:06.99 -00:27:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101273_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 101273_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101277_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 101277_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:41.96 +00:52:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101282_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 101282_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101313_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 101313_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:48.40 +03:04:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101353_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 101353_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:15.66 +02:30:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91552_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 91552_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04039_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 04039_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:46.52 -06:19:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17647_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 17647_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:10.15 -03:22:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20562_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20562_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:30.62 -02:47:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68553_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 68553_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:11.01 +02:02:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00833_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 00833_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:03.65 -06:55:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32479_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 32479_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:56.50 -01:13:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01483_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 01483_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:54.25 -06:48:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59749_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 59749_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:03.84 +02:18:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61315_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 61315_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:43.95 +01:59:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57977_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 57977_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:48.63 -00:43:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91004_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 91004_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:45.12 -01:31:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90863_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 90863_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:05.92 +00:10:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78403_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 78403_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:54.84 +00:00:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94566_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 94566_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:08.00 -02:56:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74906_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 74906_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:06.45 +00:46:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49176_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 49176_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:51.24 +00:56:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97645_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 97645_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:15.66 +00:43:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11462_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 11462_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_22-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks