This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2487 2461228.7487 13.16 20:08:53.59 -24:47:34.7
17.52928 -27.32924 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.66 Maja 1 -0 1 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:08:53.59 -24:47:34.7: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:08:53.59 -24:47:34.7: 15.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 07.2487* 20 08 53.59 -24 47 34.7 13.2 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7487,13.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2487 13.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2487 2461228.7487 13.70 20:08:28.27 -27:59:19.6
14.06572 -28.24237 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.949 Hel 1 0 1 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:08:28.27 -27:59:19.6: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:08:28.27 -27:59:19.6: 14.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7487,13.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2487 13.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2487 2461228.7487 12.46 19:42:31.47 -22:06:17.3
17.96748 -20.72434 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 9" V5551 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.200 V 15.000 V 2452513.00000 276.000000000000 Me
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:42:31.47 -22:06:17.3: 13.48 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:42:31.47 -22:06:17.3: 13.49 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V5551 Sgr,2461228.7487,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V5551 Sgr 20260707.2487 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461228.74891227 07.07.2026 05:58:16.020 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5292
Objects passed selection criteria: 5284
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5016.75
Average stars matched: 4980.25 (99.2724 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112104 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 6 21:07:40 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-130-g0d8e31cd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 7 02:09:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461228.74891227 07.07.2026 05:58:16.020 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 103
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 51 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 48074
Objects passed selection criteria: 47989
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 45811
Average stars matched: 44699.2 (97.5732 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 150680 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 6 21:07:40 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-130-g0d8e31cd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 7 02:13:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461228.74842054
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:36.593 -26:00:13.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:36.593 -26:00:13.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0118 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:33.476 -26:00:03.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:33.476 -26:00:03.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0213 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:36.593 -26:00:13.16
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:33.476 -26:00:03.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01195 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eTc1olI2t2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vqkue7VcCP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Gxa8Itr4bl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EXYospA9rS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Loaded 9410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5874 out of 6007 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6007 out of 7487 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.595150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.595150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Loaded 9410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5874 out of 6007 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6007 out of 7487 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 6777 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3531 to 311.4448 deg, Dec -31.2697 to -20.5709 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3531 to 311.4448 deg, Dec -31.2697 to -20.5709 deg
Loaded 9431 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5463 out of 5572 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5572 out of 6777 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
14.2 mag. Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.eTc1olI2t2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=461, bad_region=1497, passed=7487
Got 7487 stars (including 5600 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: vast.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_2058004.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.870000 --output scan_ucac5_2058004.output http://vast.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 969 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: tau.kirx.net
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_2058004.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.870000 --output scan_ucac5_2058004.output http://tau.kirx.net/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 968 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.497 n_q1=300 n_q2=147 n_q3=330 n_q4=191 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Vqkue7VcCP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=434, bad_region=1383, passed=6777
Got 6777 stars (including 5030 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6777 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: vast.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_2058013.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.870000 --output scan_ucac5_2058013.output http://vast.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 970 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: vast.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_2058013.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.870000 --output scan_ucac5_2058013.output http://vast.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 970 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.504 n_q1=297 n_q2=147 n_q3=340 n_q4=186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Gxa8Itr4bl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=373, bad_region=1245, passed=5670
Got 5670 stars (including 4128 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5670 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: vast.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_2058027.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.875000 --output scan_ucac5_2058027.output http://vast.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 967 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: vast.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_2058027.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.875000 --output scan_ucac5_2058027.output http://vast.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 967 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.477 n_q1=288 n_q2=149 n_q3=336 n_q4=194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EXYospA9rS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=379, bad_region=1251, passed=5652
Got 5652 stars (including 4095 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5652 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: vast.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_2058040.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.875000 --output scan_ucac5_2058040.output http://vast.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 968 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4508 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: vast.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_2058040.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.875000 --output scan_ucac5_2058040.output http://vast.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 969 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4509 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=295 n_q2=154 n_q3=330 n_q4=190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.253
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits sigma_overall=0.464 worst_q_ratio=1.094
ref2=Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits sigma_overall=0.442 worst_q_ratio=1.139
new1=fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits sigma_overall=0.469 worst_q_ratio=1.151
new2=fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits sigma_overall=0.432 worst_q_ratio=1.253
reference average sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.1165
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-57-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_012412_TTUQ2b1x1_2443209_pI42vh7g/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:06:56.34 -28:35:32.3: 11.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:09:09.33 -22:25:06.2: 12.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:09:09.33 -22:25:06.2: 12.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:06:56.34 -28:35:32.3: 11.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:09.33 -22:25:06.2: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3958 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:56.34 -28:35:32.3: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.0654 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20123_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 20123_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:04.27 -28:31:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20126_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 20126_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20129_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 20129_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01380_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 01380_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72721_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72721_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72733_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72733_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72735_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72735_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72742_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72742_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72744_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72744_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72748_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72748_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72749_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72749_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72750_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72750_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72753_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72753_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72755_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72755_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72756_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72756_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72760_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72760_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72761_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72761_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72763_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72763_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72765_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72765_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72767_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72767_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72774_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72774_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72777_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72777_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72778_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72778_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72787_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72787_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:09.02 -28:46:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72789_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72789_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:44.21 -29:54:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72790_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72790_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:17.08 -27:05:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72795_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72795_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72801_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72801_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:39.18 -24:13:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72806_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72806_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:58.02 -22:58:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72818_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72818_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:01.10 -22:19:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72819_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
Preparing report for the candidate 72819_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72825_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72825_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72839_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72839_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:13.33 -23:49:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72846_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72846_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72857_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72857_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72858_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72858_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72859_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72859_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72861_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
Preparing report for the candidate 72861_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72863_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72863_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72872_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72872_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72875_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72875_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72882_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72882_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72889_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72889_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72894_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72894_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72895_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72895_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72900_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72900_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72903_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72903_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72907_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72907_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72914_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72914_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72925_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72925_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72943_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72943_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72945_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72945_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72951_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72951_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72957_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72957_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72960_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72960_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72961_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72961_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72969_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72969_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72979_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72979_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72994_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 72994_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73009_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 73009_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73012_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 73012_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73021_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 73021_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73022_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 73022_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73037_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 73037_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73042_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 73042_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73097_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 73097_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73109_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 73109_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73120_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 73120_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73122_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 73122_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73159_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 73159_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:55.34 -22:18:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14951_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 14951_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:57.84 -27:55:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11495_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 11495_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:04.28 -28:31:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50115_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
Preparing report for the candidate 50115_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08080_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203
The candidate 08080_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-58-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0203 did not pass the final checks